A Conspiracy of Silence

©2010 drkate

Bridge to Independence (S. Cupp)

I find myself at another crossing: a stream of knowledge and information so valuable and deep that, regardless of where it leads, I must take the leap and advance to the other side. I have been brought to this point by asking, like so many, why is there silence from all who should be concerned about Obama’s lack of eligibility for the Presidency?

The legal cases against Obama contain the most precise detail of his ineligibility and failure to prove so; exhaustive research has proven his radical dossier (video scrubbed), CIA connections and Islamic ties, and many behaviors exist to show his nefarious intent for the United States. Extensive documentation exists of the caucus and election fraud that accompanied Obama’s placement in the White House, as well as illegal campaign funds.

What is it that Obama has on the republicans and democrats, and what do the republicans have on the democrats and Obama that causes their silence?

Remembering the Ascent of the Democrats

Back in 2005 and 2006, the country was ready to impeach George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and the republican brand was slowly disintegrating under the weight of 911, the Patriot Act, the Iraq war, torture, and the budget deficit.  The democrats were sounding the alarm of a needed investigation into 911, and Nancy Pelosi wanted subpoena power to investigate Bush officials misuses of the War Powers clause.

But suddenly, Pelosi took  impeachment  off the table because there was no ‘evidence that Bush committed any criminal acts’.  John Conyers, who had written Constitution in Crisis and had signaled his strong intent to pursue impeachment but also caved, saying in 2006:

“In this campaign, there was an orchestrated right-wing effort to distort my position on impeachment,” Conyers said in a statement released by his Judiciary Committee spokesman. “The incoming speaker (Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.) has said that impeachment is off the table. I am in total agreement with her on this issue: Impeachment is off the table.”

The democrats, with a new majority in the House, proceeded to act recklessly with taxpayer dollars, support outrageous funding proposed by the Bush administration, brought the housing and financial crisis to a head, and failed to exercise any oversight on the wars, the CIA, or their own conduct. The democratic leadership was either co-opted or complicit.

Things got worse under the democrats and by the time the 2008 election rolled along, the American public was weary and susceptible to a slogan-based, ‘feel good’,  campaign.  The republican brand was ‘toast’.

The Truth Seekers

911 Truth Seekers.From the onset of the 911 attack, to the passage of the Patriot Act, to the 911 Commission Report, and through the initiation and conduct of the Iraq War, American citizens have been continuing to pursue the truth that has been apparently hidden about all these events. These Americans, backed by considerable evidence, suspect that 911 was an ‘inside job’, and at the very least the government had advance notice and had participated in a cover-up operation through the 911 Commission report.

The questions that have been raised by the Truth Seekers touch upon the related issues of our government’s behavior, for example,  the convenient arrival of the Patriot Act just three weeks after 911–another blow to the Bill of Rights and our liberty. Other serious issues involve the government’s complicity in and cover-up of the mass murder of Americans, and its deliberate and continued departure  from the Constitution in pursuit of policy objectives  antithetical to our Constitutional Republic and leading to the continuous meddling in foreign affairs.

These Americans were labeled conspiracy theorists, ‘911 truthers’, wackos, ‘un-American’, and more derogatory names by politicians, the media, the judges through their rulings, and by their fellow Americans.

Those who were pursuing the Iraq war raised all the right issues: rationale (s), torture and rendition; authorization; oversight; funding; the CIA’s role, and many more concerns that pointed to a serious breakdown of  government.

Looking back at this time, it seems that diversions were invented by the government to give the appearance of working on these issues, complete with the ‘left-right’ discussion paradigm.  Consider, for example, the Valerie Plame investigation; torture, and rendition.  The democrats had a field day criticizing the republicans, threatening to hold investigations, and then never holding them.

An interesting facet of this discussion is that the democrats actually are complicit with the republicans in an overall ‘whitewash’ of these issues.  Remember how Pelosi was caught saying the CIA lied to her about torture?  Another distraction, but a transparent one in showing the democrats and republicans are in this together, and this was just a partisan game intended to deflect attention away from the truth.

Article II Eligibility Truth Seekers. Toward the election of and all during 2008 and continuing, another group of Truth Seekers sought and seeks desperately to alert the American public as to the ineligibility of Barack Obama for the Presidency and the danger of his ideologies to America. Like the other Truth Seekers, this group of Americans were labeled as “birthers”, racists, anti-Americans, and sore losers.

Despite the deafening silence from our elected leaders cowards–all of them–the excuses of the judiciary, these Americans have been every bit as tenacious and relentless in the pursuit of the truth regarding Obama’s eligibility.  The law and the facts are on the Birthers our side, and the issue will not go awaySeven states now have legislation pending that would require eligibility proof as a condition of appearing on the State’s election ballot for President and Vice-President.  The Continental Congress 2009 addressed recommended this very state action in Article 13 of the Articles of Freedom.

And…

Here we are in March 2010, and none of these issues are resolved: 911, the Iraq war, the torture, and the placement of a usurper in the White House.  Think about this–not a word, action, or concern.  Just a flurry of stuff to jam up and distract Americans. Crickets on these other issues as if they never happened.

?????  :???:

The Crossing:  The Truthseekers United

When I put this together, I realize that the silence is related to blackmail and cover-up of the some of the most heinous crimes against the American people committed by both republicans and democrats and across several administrations, subject to extreme manipulation by the large financiers.

I  am positing that the republicans know full well about Obama’s ineligibility, and that Obama and the democrats know something about the Bush-Cheney participation in the crime of 911.  Investigations were dropped by Pelosi in 2007, I believe,  to prepare the way for their person of choice in 2008.

Further, I assert that Obama knows about the Clinton administration FBI activities with respect to the first World Trade Center bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing, both of which could be seen as ‘false flag’ operations, completed by governments in order to cast blame on someone else, to initiate the passage of laws or to move in some policy direction.  Indeed, the first major anti-terror legislation was signed right after the first WTC bombing.

I further assert that Obama knows about the financial attack on America on September 18, 2008, which precipitated the massive and unchecked TARP bailout and secured the election of Obama.

There is compelling evidence emerging again on the truth of the 911 attack, this time advanced by the  association of Architects and Engineers, who have called for a Grand Jury investigation of the investigators of the site.  The linked article has a set of 6 videos, the first of which is included below, to describe the explosive evidence that the Twin Towers, and WTC Building 7 collapsed due to planted explosives within the building.

Billions in gold stored beneath WTC

This disturbing information suggests that 911 was also a ‘false flag’ operation with multiple objectives, including theft of gold,  the passage of the Patriot Act, the invasion of Iraq, the identification of an amorphous target and thus creation of permanent war, and the domestic spying on Americans–all of which Obama and the democrats have not stopped.

It is to all of their advantage to use this information as leverage to gain absolute power and permanence of position, at the obvious expense of the American people.  If that is not pure evil or of satanic influence, I don’t know what is.

Now this last piece of the 911 silence in the face of damning information is probably the most mind-blowing.  It is a 2-hour film called “9-11 missing links” (h/t d2i) and it will blow your socks off.  The film asserts that 911 was a false flag operation designed to cast dispersion against Muslims and to foment Americans’ desire for retribution.  The film is also over on the V-Pod in the sidebar for permanent reference.

Obama’s Ascent, America’s Demise

The audacity of Obama’s ascent to the White House, with the support of the entire government, can only be explained by a secret so large that the entire government falls with its revelation.  I believe that there are a few people in government who are aware of this who are Americans and realize what danger our country is in.  They are in the minority, and fear, bribery, intimidation, and blackmail undoubtedly prevail.

For this warrior Patriot, the bridge has been crossed and I have landed in this space.  I look forward to all of your comments on this post, and hope to heck my theory is wrong.

But the silence is so loud, it is deafening.

68 Responses to “A Conspiracy of Silence”


  1. 1 terminu March 2, 2010 at 11:27 pm

    I saw a nature film where two male gazelles were fighting eachother nearly to death over breeding rights…when stalking lionesses lept from out of nowhere and put them both out of their miseries, permanently.
    While the Dems and Reps finagle and compete for the spoils of domination over America, we must be like the lionesses and force a game-plan change. We are stalking them, and when we move it will be fast, furious, and overwhelming.
    They are 545, we are 320 Million; they will lose.

    • 2 drkate March 3, 2010 at 12:51 pm

      A good image, but so sad to see ‘politicians feasting over the spoils of America’–apt description.

  2. 3 Rick March 3, 2010 at 5:09 am

    I agree with terminu. I am 78 and have never seen the American people so riled up and at both political parties, which is a good sign.

    Also Americans are now, regardless of court decisions, determined to not let anyone take away our Second Amendment rights–which are a guarantee of preserving other rights. Before that happens, I believe a shooting war will erupt. And those on the wrong side need to beware. A sleeping giant has been awakened, and nothing will put it to sleep until our mounting problems are solved.

    After those elected officials have been voted out, charges need to be brought against those who have violated the basic principles of the Constitution.

    Those we now elect need to promise they will pass term limits and repeal the Seventeenth Amendment returning the loyalty of senators back to their respective states instead of their parties. Then the Sixteenth Amendment and the Fed also need to be repealed. Roe V Wade need to be overturned giving the decisions about abortion returned to the states.

    Otherwise, we do all else in vain.

    • 4 drkate March 3, 2010 at 10:49 pm

      An excellent agenda, agreed. Judicial Reform across the board as well, I want many existing judges removed, especially if they have convicted anyone on tax issues.

  3. 5 Papoose March 3, 2010 at 5:56 am

    Collusion has always been my theory.

    Hillary conceding in Denver and closing up shop when NY came to the floor while she was winning was the telltale for me.

    Though swept under the carpet, it doesn’t make sense that Osama Bin Laden is missing. Plus his family members were flown out of the country on 9/11.

    And that FBI woman shut up when she told us that she reported that Saudis were taking flying lessons for take off only.

    Chief Justice swearing in a half-blooded American with communistic leanings as Commander In Chief.

    The list is long.

    Whatever it is, its really big.

    We should have an independent audit of Fort Knox.

    • 6 drkate March 3, 2010 at 10:50 pm

      Agreed totally. I heard the Ft. Knox gold is gone, and where did the gold go beneath the WTC?

  4. 7 Ginger March 3, 2010 at 6:59 am

    Fear, threats upon them and their family. Of course most of them fear being exposed! I am sure that the evil ones are holding something on them that they do not want exposed. It doesn’t matter if our country is being torn down by the fraud and his little pi** ants. Oh and of course fear that Barry/Steve will pull his “race” card. He has the backing of corruption, money, and power. A lot of people can and are being bought.

  5. 8 No-nonsense-nancy March 3, 2010 at 8:15 am

    I read an article some time ago that claimed that all of the supposed Muslim pilots of the 911 planes are living in various countries and what they are doing, making livings, etc. The author claimed they are not dead! They never were on those planes.

    I think We the People need to get rid of ALL of congress, Justice and Supreme court, good or bad, and start over again; build the country again just like they did in the beginning. It took them a couple of years to fill all of the spots but we have time. And it probably wouldn’t take that much time to fill them.

    Thank you, Dr. Kate, you are a brave and courageous patriot!

  6. 9 d2i March 3, 2010 at 9:06 am

    Outstanding report, dk. You’ve nailed it so eloquently. Now that my eyes and mind are open they will never be closed again. Never! It all makes sense now. All of it. And it breaks my heart.

    Did you read Dr. Roberts recent article? Here’s a link. http://worldreports.org/news/272_paul_craig_roberts_sticks_it_to_the_911_criminals

  7. 10 tiger 7 March 3, 2010 at 9:09 am

    Dr. Kate, you have gone to the core of our problem—the issues you raise are valid. Your scenario also supports my theory that the majority of professional politicians are members of the “brotherhood” and are more loyal to fellow politicians than to party or the people they are supposed to represent. Country comes way down the line.
    The big question, of course, is what do we do about the mess. It must start on the local level and it will not happen over night. The first step is to remove the incumbents –whichever party–and establish term limits. Term limit will have to come from the state level, no national representative will ever vote for it.
    Also, the immediate need is to get BHO out before he does too much more damage. Again, unfortunately this probably will have to come from action by the states.
    Hang in there, the fun is yet to come!!!

    • 11 drkate March 3, 2010 at 10:54 pm

      A checklist

      Remove all incumbents
      Term limits
      –related–ending taxpayer subsidy of salaries for life
      Repeal patriot act
      Void 16th amendment and dismantle IRS
      repeal 17th amendment
      eliminate Dept Education
      End the FED
      delete homeland security department

  8. 12 JustMe2 March 3, 2010 at 9:36 am

    No-Nonsense-Nancy,

    Yes, that’s the consensus by many – several of them are living large in various countries working and/or going to school. Webster Tarpley has a number of excellent videos on youtube covering many details that are relatively unknown to the public. His book 9/11 Synthetic Terror is also an excellent read. Michael Ruppert has videos as well that are worth the watch.

    Thanks Dr. Kate for the excellent article and for giving this subject the attention it deserves. We must all continue to see the truth!

    • 13 drkate March 3, 2010 at 10:55 pm

      Thanks Justme…thanks for the info on the supposed death of the hijackers. One thing that never made sense…that they found the hijackers passports in the rubble of the WTC.

  9. 14 Michelle March 3, 2010 at 9:59 am

    This was one of your best articles, “the truth will set you free”. Our country will never be free until we learn the truth no matter how ugly it is. Blackmail, collusion, bribes every criminal endeavour so some one can look good/bad. Executive, Legislative and Judicial-if the truth is not told soon this cancer will only fester. I can understand if a person made a mistake Dem/Rep based on faulty or inaccurate intelligence-humans make mistakes. You have to admit that you made a mistake and try to correct it the best way you can-a conspiracy(s) is a cold blooded attack meaning you have some knowledge and use it in a nefarious fashion. Dem or Rep we have to find the truth and let the chips fall where they may. As opposed to the approximate 1,000 folks in our government-the three branches-paid by the citizens-who are suffering in the trenches our soldiers and the people who are suffering economic and other hardships and our government run like Rome at its worst. We can and will do much better.

    • 15 drkate March 3, 2010 at 10:57 pm

      Thank you for those kind words. It means a lot to me, as I went out on a limb as they say doing this.

      We will do much better.

  10. 16 Christinewjc March 3, 2010 at 10:00 am

    The 9-11 conspiracy theory doesn’t make sense to me. Popular Science magazine had a huge spread that debunked the claims that the “truthers” were spewing. Here is a post that includes a link to PS magazine’s article. Plus, here’s another paper that debunks one particular 9/11 conspiracy theorist’s claims.

    With that said, I DO think that the Dems are using such a theory (plus probably other things) to blackmail the Repubs into silence on the Obama ineligibility issue. Then again, if you read my latest post and what’s written at the links, it just might reveal that both Dem and Repub lawmakers don’t even care if Obama’s not a natural born citizen! Didn’t Obama say that “it’s a flawed document?” Didn’t Bush once say that [the Constitution] “is just a piece of paper?” I was horrified when I heard Bush say that!

    Progressivism is the disease that is infecting our government. No doubt about it! But there is only a fringe amount of people who believe the 9/11 truther conspiracy theories.

    Why would Obama have hired green jobs czar Van Jones – knowing (as Glenn Beck recently exposed on his TV show) that Jones was a 9/11 truther, and then boot him out (through telling him to resign) when the public became aware of it? Jones is still working for the administration – but in a different capacity. If Obama agreed with the truther theories, why wouldn’t he have convinced Jones to stay as the green jobs czar? Was it for political expediency that he let him resign – only to keep him on “behind the scenes” with that Marxist organization (the title escapes me at the moment) Jones is currently working for?

    In my opinion, the reason that 9/11 happened was because of what the Clinton administration (and that stupid Jamie Gorelick) DIDN’T do to prevent Bin Laden and his suicide/homicide terrorist crazies from carrying it out.

    There are progressive Republicans out there, but I don’t think that they would go along with the belief that 9/11 was an “inside job.” They may agree with some of the Dem legislation, but I don’t think that they want either a Marxist or Islamic takeover of our nation – even if they were bribed or threatened in some way.

    If what you are claiming (about the 9/11 truthers and the conspiracy surrounding it all) is true, then our nation is in even more devastatingly dire straits and deep, deep trouble than I could have ever imagined!

    The Defend Our Freedoms blogger, RepubX, had an excellent post about the fight that is going on between the Marxists and Radical Islamists for dominance in the world. THAT is the struggle that I think is currently going on here in America. Apparently (as of 3/3/10 at 7:27 a.m.PT) Repubx’s site is down. However, I was able to find some archived articles.

    The first one is about George Soros. He’s the Marxist mastermind who helped get Obama elected by attempting to take down America’s financial system.

    Here is a link to past articles regarding the The War on Terror at RepubX. Their intentions have been clearly made known – to take down America (the “great satan” as they called our nation) as will as Israel (the “little satan” as they have ignorantly labeled that nation.)

    I apologize. I cannot find the original article that I read which did a great job of pitting the fight between Marxists and Muslims for the takeover and control of America. I will keep looking and perhaps I can share that link later.

    Of course, this is only my opinion. But I think that the current “engagement” of the Marxists and Islamists, where they have agreed to coexist and do whatever they can to destroy America will eventually fall apart. They might be working in collusion with each other for now, but in the end only one of the two probably actually thinks that they are superior over the other. Thus, they think that they will be able to claim an ultimately victory (God FORBID!) against our country. I see it as similar to the struggle that went on between the Nazis and the Communists in World War II. They secretly worked together at first (as Glenn Beck’s excellent historical documentary showed us a few weeks ago); but eventually they ended up fighting against each other. I think that the same thing will happen between today’s Marxists (a.k.a. Communists) and Radical Islamists.

    • 17 drkate March 3, 2010 at 10:10 am

      Did you look at the post’s videos? I don’t think the popular mechanics article proved or disproved anything. But looking at these six videos will educate you tremendously.

      Of course there is the subplot of the communists, radical islam, that the bilderbergers, etc. The CIA is intimately involved.

      Look at the videos, and the 2 hour film, and then come back!

      • 18 terminu March 3, 2010 at 1:47 pm

        Medina sank her ship by even entertaining truthers, which means that their ridicule is efficacious even as it is wrong to attack honest intellectual inquiry, because what ‘they’ did is pure treason and murder, hang high from the gallows stuff.
        The slimy tentacles of their swamp monsters threaten all who enter the swamp. Truther information is really third rail stuff, the eligibility issue–not so much.
        For example, I’ve called Pelosi and Frank’s offices and insofar as the birther issue they will openly vilely abuse (phone slam)and are so drunk with power they don’t care that he is ineligible and dare anyone to do anything about it. “So? What are you going to do about it?” “Doesn’t matter, he’s not going anywhere.” That one, they figure they got in the bag, got away with, cuz they have the media and they figure Americans are too stupid to understand it. They’re wrong of course, as their future punishments will always ‘hang’ over their heads.
        But the 911 attacks are another matter, even the most somnolent American content with cheetos and a tv gameshow would go ballistic if they found absolutely that Pelosi, Clinton, Bush, Obama, et al…knew, were complicit. The truther issue must scare them far more.

        • 19 tdr March 3, 2010 at 7:31 pm

          I cannot agree with you that 911 was an inside job, at least I do not think Bush knew about it. Did someone? Maybe. I am facinated by the theory that our goverment is infiltrated by dual citizenship appointed members that can push an agenda. Herein lies a big problem. There is total credibility that the isreali’s could have infiltrated a radical islam group to assist 911 knowing that we would have to pursue the terrorists. Cheap money on isreali’s part. The issue is whether our leaders are in control at all not whether they are co-conspirators. It would be great to start a list of must have’s within the next 6 years like no dual citizenship appointments to any goverment position, term limits, no entitlements. If you want to serve, it is to serve the people.

          Audit the Fed!

          • 20 drkate March 3, 2010 at 11:00 pm

            It is indeed puzzling. Someone knew, and I do suspect Cheney.

            yes the infiltration angle is very interesting to me. I agree, no dual appointments in government in high positions, and I would eliminate Israel’s waiver.

  11. 21 Christinewjc March 3, 2010 at 10:06 am

    Update:

    RepubX’s blog is back online. Found this:

    Socialism-Communism, no US Sovereignty and Islamification. Obama’s big Three.

    Still looking for the original article I mentioned earlier.

    • 22 drkate March 3, 2010 at 10:10 am

      Thank you!

    • 23 drkate March 3, 2010 at 11:01 pm

      absolutely, those are obama’s characteristics and agenda for the US. It is outrageous that a foreign national would be allowed to change our government, and everyone cover for his ineligibility!

  12. 24 Christinewjc March 3, 2010 at 10:49 am

    I will look at the video as long as it is not Alex Jones’ work. Been there, done that. But it will have to wait until I have a two hour time slot to view the video.

    I know what it is like to be mocked for one’s beliefs. Being a Christian conservative who is highly concerned about Obama’s ineligibility has caused many people – even relatives – to label me as a crazy conspiracy theorist. But Dr. Kate, it is hard for me to believe that you (based on what I have read at your blog recently) would believe something that a radical Communist like Van Jones believes about 9/11/2001. Please know that I’m not trying to start a fight – just a discussion. If you go to Popular Mechanics article link in my first comment, you will see an argument that I had with a truther in the past.

    I have included a link to your post, my comment and links, and a word search link that includes the terms “Marxism and Islam” from the Defend Our Freedoms (RepubX) blog in my post today.

    I can certainly appreciate the rest of your article. But the 9/11 truther portion just doesn’t make sense to me. Sorry.

    Thanks for this civil discussion. I appreciate that you have been willing to post my comments.

    • 25 drkate March 3, 2010 at 11:06 am

      The editor of Popular Mechanics is a relative of Chertoff. Whoever did 911, it was a crime, and the crime scene evidence was removed.

      I started this post talking about a bridge that I had to cross. I frankly don’t care if people are ‘surprised’ that I could come to this conclusion. I had not intended to end up here. I try to be intellectually honest, as well as honest in my dealings. That sense will not allow me to ignore these issues.

      But tell me, what other reasons could there be for the silence on Obama and also 911?

      Please, please look at the videos, it doesn’t matter how much time it takes. But if you love your country as much as you say you do, look at the film and the A&E reports. Then ask yourself the question I did, is the silence around OBama’s lack of eligibility the ‘price’ paid for not revealing the 911 cover up?

      I am just as uncomfortable with this realization or linking as you are, as I am sure many are. So if you have another explanation, I am all ears!

    • 26 LisaGinNZ March 3, 2010 at 9:07 pm

      Thank you for all your sage comments on this post, Christinewjc

      I agree with you completely about the Alex Jones’ stuff.

      I’m a tad disappointed in this post Dr. Kate.

      My $.02 is: if (someone) repeats a lie AND gets more and more paid experts to agree with said theory/lie, this lie seems more and more believable.

      What if these architects are like climate scientists? Can’t be? Why not?

      The man-made global warming has been debunked for the past few months/years: but does the media or all Americans yet realize it yet? ummm… noooooo… there are still those (eg Al Gore) who believe at the temple of AGW and will NEVER be unconvinced…

      If a “group” can sell AGW, why not push the 9/11 was a huge government conspiracy theory?

      Just food for thought

      • 27 drkate March 3, 2010 at 9:20 pm

        Good points, all.

        Did you look at the videos? The difference between these scientists and the global warming scientists is quite different: in one you are dealing with the physical and chemical analysis of actual physical samples of material–whatever is left after the crime scene was destroyed– versus the climate scientists who are dealing with computer models of hypothetical situations, temperature readings from vastly different measuring devices and tools over time, and large uncertainties.

        Notice that the scientists did not put forth ANY theory. They just said that from the samples they analyzed, another look is warranted.

        The 2 hour film is what is most disturbing to me. The people who were caught celebrating and filming the fall of the twin towers in New York were Israelis. There mission was ‘to film the event’…their words exactly.

        My posts are not intended to be personality contests; and I expect people to disagree, or be ‘disappointed’ as you say. Respectfully, I am standing by this, as uncomfortable as it makes me and many others, I’m sure.

  13. 28 Christinewjc March 3, 2010 at 11:17 am

    Oh my gosh. I could not claim to have “the” explanation. I am searching for the truth just like so many others are.

    If Obama’s father was someone other than Obama Sr. (as it has been rumored to be Frank Marshall Davis), then we don’t have a usurper – just a very terrible, inexperienced, anti-Capitalism, pro-Marxist, pro-Islam treasonous person in office. But it is difficult to believe that Obama would spend 1.5 million to hide that. A Christian blogging friend of mine once suggested that maybe the birth certificate would reveal that his father was a Muslim – and that’s why they keep it hidden. Could be – but I think that turned out to be general knowledge even before the election.

    There have been many Congressmen deciding NOT to run again in 2010. Maybe they know what’s up and that it can’t be “cleaned up” while they are in office – where bribes, threats, and blackmail could be used to silence them.

    I sincerely hope that everything will break wide open after the 2010 election. Once Congress changes hands (and power), then maybe those who have the knowledge of what’s REALLY going on will then be able to speak freely again.

    • 29 drkate March 3, 2010 at 11:27 am

      Yes Christine, we are all searching, and it is useful to have a good dialogue, not accusatory. Thank you for raising those issues.

      Because all we know is that OBama’s father was Obama sr (his book of fiction, perhaps), and that knowledge makes him ineligible. But he had to dumb down the issue to the birth certificate, which he still won’t show. Most Americans have bought that one hook line and sinker.

      Now if his father was an american citizen, then we do have a problem–because of the lies and fraud. He would still be removed because of the deceit. He could not be ‘cleared’ legally as he would have lied to every state in the Union about who he is. This is a felony.

      Something smells fishy with all of this!

      • 30 d2i March 3, 2010 at 2:32 pm

        The issue regarding Obama’s ineligibility has everything to do with his adoption by Lolo Soetoro. He may very well have been born on American soil by two American’s but the moment his mother signed the adoption papers, Obama became a citizen of Indonesia. There is no reciprocity agreement of citizenship b/w the US and Indonesia. None. Therefore, his mother forfeited his natural born citizenship when she signed his adoption papers.

        The entire birth certificate scavenger hunt has served as an intentional and deliberate distraction by the likes of Orly, Berg, Leo to name a few.

        Why? Simple. All of his records were sealed when he went to Afghanistan as a CIA operative. He and everyone else knows this. Not a big secret. So he and devilish goons got us conspiracy neophytes to look in one direction when all along its always been about his adoption.

        jbjd has done amazing work and honed in on the culprit with her election fraud work. Being the legal eye that she is, thank God, she went to work to build a solid election fraud case. Now, ask yourself why the state Republican AsG have not persued an investigation? I’m certain you can entertain a variety of answers.

        What is most scary about Obama is this – he may never have gone through naturalization thereby even being a citizen. He may very well an illegal alien. Now if that doesn’t get your panties in a knot, then I don’t know what will.

    • 31 tdr March 3, 2010 at 7:40 pm

      The One’s past is so sorted that to unravel it would be a no win situation. The clear cut case is that BHO sr is his father and therefore it makes him ineligible. The more likely scenario is that either someone else is on the BC or no one is, now what? How can a politician start something without knowing where it will lead. This administration is the dirtiest I have seen yet. I like the Lame Cherry suggestion. We need someone that is willing to play the game by their rules. DK, I can barely sleep thinking of what is happening. Mostly because there is no good solution. The die is cast, we were kept in the dark. I do not see an easy way out. There is no hope at the polls other than to delay the inevitable. There is no other USA to preserve freedom. The only solution I see is state sovereignty and BHO knows it so he is working that angle also. God help us.

  14. 32 GORDO March 3, 2010 at 11:35 am

    At: “The Right Side of Life”

    (Near end of article.)

    “The Republican Party has a history of accommodating presidential candidates whose Constitutional eligibility is uncertain.

    * Chester Arthur — America’s first post-1787-born president whose parents were not both U.S. citizens — was a Republican.

    * George Romney ran for the Republican party nomination in 1968. He was born in Mexico.

    * Barry Goldwater was born (in 1909) in Phoenix, when Arizona was still territory, not yet a state.

    * Lowell Weicker entered the race for the Republican party nomination of 1980 but dropped out before voting in the primaries began. He was born in Paris, France.

    * John McCain was born in Panama, not the Panama Canal Zone as is widely believed. But regardless of whether he was born in the Panama Canal Zone or in Panama itself, he was, in either case, a Panamanian citizen at birth.

    * Bobby Jindal is a possible Republican presidential candidate in 2012. He was born in the United States, but at the time of his birth, his parents were not U.S. citizens. (In a Southern U.S. state, immigrants’ son takes over)

    Given its history of eligibility-questionable presidential candidates, the Republican Party would be accused of hypocrisy if it were to challenge President Obama’s eligibility.”

    http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2010/02/22/eligibility-hi-petition-launched-in-spite-of-introduced-bills/

    ========

    From: “Obama Presidential Eligibility – An Introductory Primer”

    http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

    • 33 drkate March 3, 2010 at 11:57 am

      More evidence of the republicans and democrats violating the constitution as a ‘gotcha’ game with each other.

  15. 34 Christinewjc March 3, 2010 at 12:09 pm

    Thanks for sharing that info and the links, Gordo. I have added the “Obama Presidential Eligibility – An Introductory Primer” to my blog sidebar under “Obama Comprehensive Information.”

    The fact that Republicans have been willing to ignore the eligibility problems of candidates in the past (and might try to elect Jindal???) is highly disturbing.

    When will we EVER get this beloved Nation of ours back in the hands of a Natural Born Citizen – who is a Constitution upholding Conservative Patriot – leading us as our POTUS?

  16. 36 susan h March 3, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    I really don’t care how many times these requirements have been overlooked, eligibility still matters. Especially in the instance of Obama, eligibility matters. His foreign upbringing, his anti-American sentiment make him uniquely unqualified and unacceptable to be our president at this time. Just because someone breaks the law and seems to get away with it, doesn’t make it right for you or me to do so too. It is no defense to say: Well, so and so didn’t pay their taxes, so I won’t either. So and so stole from a bank, so I guess I can too. None of that matters. The real problem was that the media failed to do its job of reporting and continues to do so. Without a modern day Woodward and Bernstein willing to risk everything to get this story exposed, and not just on FOX News, and some main stream newspaper or media outlet presenting it in a fashion that could not be ignored, Obama will get away with the biggest con in our history with the lies and deception he has perpetrated on the American people.

  17. 38 Quantum Leap March 3, 2010 at 3:38 pm

    I have a distinct feeling as always that nancy pelousy is the one heading all the threats along with flotus. I just saw another vid of her this morning talking about Rangel and she looked sacred to death. Every vid I see of her lately she looks like she saw a ghost. She’s going down with odickhead and the whole bunch.
    Anyone else notice how scared she looks lately? It a far cry from her phony confident botox self.
    Here’s a dibby on Rangel who been there since 1970! Let the games begin.

    He was encouraged to step aside before the House could vote on a Republican measure to strip him of his chairmanship, which could have happened as early as on Wednesday.

    House Republican leader John Boehner, who had pushed for Rangel to step down, mocked his statement that he was taking a leave of absence.

    “There is nothing in the rules of the House that refers to temporarily stepping aside,” Boehner said. “Either you’re the chairman or you’re not.”

    “He does not deserve to be a member of the Democrat leadership nor as chairman of his committee,” Boehner said.

    The controversy has been an embarrassment for the House Democratic leadership.

    And neither party is any different. Most all of them are theives and crooks. Rep of Kentucky trying to defeat the unemployment extension program. That’s a crock and it’s not an entitlement program. People pay into that and need it badly when they can’t find jobs.
    “How you going to pay for it” the Rep from KY says. My oh my the fund is broke? So pay it out of the TARP funds instead of saving it to use for odickhead’s campaign in 2011.

  18. 39 tiger 7 March 3, 2010 at 3:51 pm

    Yesterday is a cancelled check, tommorow is a promisary note, but today is cash in the hand—the problem of BHO is now. All the past is just that, past. We can learn from it, but that’s about all. FDR knew the Japs were attacking Pearl Harbor and that served his purpose, but that was then. Let us address the present danger.

  19. 41 swh March 3, 2010 at 8:18 pm

    Well, Doc, you shook the rafters again. Another uccinct and powerful assesment. I remember not too long ago when I first seriously entertained the idea these Truthers are playing with, I was stunned as if I were standing on the front porch watching the sidewalk pull away. I’d heard very briefly of it before but didn’t have a split second of course for such foolishness… but I had it put to me now by somebody I had great respect for and never guessed would esposse such off the chart perspective. The two hour video [911 Missing Links] drives it home pretty well I’d say. Thanks for the heads up.

  20. 42 swh March 3, 2010 at 8:20 pm

    succinct… espoused… I should have reread it before posting.

  21. 43 Rick March 3, 2010 at 8:27 pm

    The only way we can find out a lot of the secrets that are in the closet somewhere, or under the rug, is to make a complete clean sweep of both houses of congress, and to elect a president who is not a politician, but simply a patriot who is a true conservative, and has been living it all his or her life.

  22. 44 drkate March 3, 2010 at 9:11 pm

    Another link difficult to ignore: here Naps and the southern poverty law center say the Tea Party people are ‘just like timothy mcveigh”

    http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=5760

  23. 45 Quantum Leap March 3, 2010 at 10:00 pm

    This TAX Poem is too true to be funny.

    Tax his land, Tax his wages,
    Tax his bed in which he lays.
    Tax his tractor, Tax his mule,
    Teach him taxes are the rule.
    Tax his cow, Tax his goat,
    Tax his pants, Tax his coat.
    Tax his ties, Tax his shirt,
    Tax his work, Tax his dirt.
    Tax his booze. Tax his beers.
    If he cried, Tax his tears.
    Tax his bills. Tax his gas.
    Tax his notes. Tax his cash.
    Tax him good and let him know
    that after taxes,
    He has no dough.
    If he hollers, Tax him more.
    Tax him until he’s good and sore.
    Tax his coffin. Tax his grave.
    Tax the sod in which he lays.
    Put these words upon his tomb:
    “Taxes drove me to my doom!”
    And when he’s gone, we won’t relax,
    We’ll still be after the inheritance TAX!
    Kick the bums out-2010.

  24. 47 Leza March 4, 2010 at 5:19 am

    drkate,

    I am not a 9/11 truther, nor a Birther, both ideological phrases made up by our government to dispel, turn the table of sorts to reverse psychology. Goverments across the globe have used the same tatic to gain control of the people and dispel “common logic”. Another words “mind control” to keep from seeking any truths. I want to thank you and d2i for your research into the “common logic” of 9/11, and the possibilities of the governments involvement.

  25. 48 Miri March 4, 2010 at 8:15 am

    Love you, Dr. Kate. Thanks for this.

    I don’t know what I think, but I do know that some are complicit; there’s a huge secret; there’s a “gun” to someone’s head; and We the People are required to stand up.

    You raise an interesting question: Why did the Dems backed off impeachment?

    Were the Israelis involved? If so, then if Pelosi and company learned that for a fact, what would they do with the information? Would they reveal it for the good of the country and perhaps even the world OR would they use it to gain more political power? I would bet on “more power for us; more power now.”

    It’s beyond question that the ever-confident O’Bobblehead (as I call him, based upon his bouncing head, toggling back and forth between TOTUSes)–the ever-confident O’Bobblehead KNEW before the election that he would win. His in-your-face symbolism, his giving the finger to Hillary and others, his smug face–all indicated that he knew he would win, one way or another. By hook or by crook.

    Why no investigation into his clearly illegal fundraising? Case in point.

    What’s frightening is his recent comment about preferring to be a one-term president so long as things get done. It’s as if he KNOWS that he will not be a one-term president.

    We watched this develop together, over at TDs blog; and it’s shaping up to be a repeat. It’s frightening.

    The media are complicit, too. WHY? That’s the question.

    There are a lot of theories but none yet that answers every particular.

    In any case, thanks for your insights and analyses. You always help us to get our heads straight.

    • 50 drkate March 4, 2010 at 9:50 am

      THANK YOU! Confirmation!

      • 51 itooktheredpill March 4, 2010 at 10:51 am

        I don’t think President George W. Bush had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, but in my opinion it appears that he trusted people who shouldn’t have been trusted.

        If anyone in this country had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, I believe that Bill Ayers is the most likely suspect.

        And Ayers is certainly more than just “some guy in Obama’s neighborhood”.

        There have been Communists in our government for a long, long time, and I believe that 9/11 was not only an Islamic Jihadist attack but also a Communist attack against American capitalism.

        Why do you think the World Trade Centers were targeted?

        In my opinion, it is because they were arguably the most well-recognized symbols of American capitalism.

        And I do believe that there is a correlation between the planning of 9/11 and the passage of the Patriot Act.

        Like so many bills over the last 13 months, neither the President nor the Congress actually read the bill before it was voted on and signed into law. If the far left was so adamantly opposed to the Patriot Act, then why did Obama and the Democrats just renew it? The fact is that they like the power it gives the federal government. And that power can be abused.

        Have you ever thought about the fact that it takes longer to write a bill than it takes to read it? And if no one had the time to read it before voting on it, then how did anyone have the time to write it? It stands to reason that the Patriot Act has a lot in common with the “Stimulus” bill that was passed last year…

        We found out that the “Stimulus” bill was not written by Congress, but rather by the Apollo alliance, which is run by Communists. They had the bill ready to go, and were just waiting for the right “crisis” to exploit to pass it.

        I think the Patriot Act was written in advance, and its authors were waiting for the right “crisis” to exploit to pass it. They may have even played a role in creating that “crisis”.

        Without 9/11, there would have been no Patriot Act.

        I support Constitutional law enforcement, and I think some parts of the Patriot Act actually help that. But I think other parts facilitate unconstitutional actions, and could be used against us by a tyrannical government.

        • 52 drkate March 4, 2010 at 10:59 am

          I agree that Bush didn’t know ahead of time…he would not have been able to live with himself if he did.

          Not so with Cheney. And I agree with you about Ayers…that makes total sense. He should be arrested and interrogated.

        • 53 Renee March 4, 2010 at 6:30 pm

          Hummm.. good point RedPill..Great post DrKate.

  26. 54 d2i March 4, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    One of the posters in The T-Room, http://www.t-room.us, just posted this for our readers. I thought your readers would find it quite interesting, especially since many of us grappling with the issue of 9/11, eligibility, blackmail and more.

    (dk, note the 2000 election noted in this article)

    Journal of Am. Behavioral Scientist addresses SCADs – STATE CRIMES AGAINST DEMOCRACY

    This paper was mentioned by David Rae Griffin in the recent press conference tapes of Architects/Engineers for 911 truth.

    New research in the journal American Behavioral Scientist (Sage publications, February 2010) addresses the concept of “State Crimes Against Democracy” (SCAD). Professor Lance deHaven-Smith from Florida State University writes that SCADs involve highlevel government officials, often in combination with private interests, that engage in covert activities for political advantages and power.

    Proven SCADs since World War II include McCarthyism (fabrication of evidence of a communist infiltration), Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (President Johnson and Robert McNamara falsely claimed North Vietnam attacked a US ship), burglary of the office of Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist in effort to discredit Ellsberg, the Watergate break-in, Iran-Contra, Florida’s 2000 Election (felon disenfranchisement program), and fixed intelligence on WMDs to justify the Iraq War.1

    The term “conspiracy theory” is often used to denigrate and discredit inquiry into the veracity of suspected SCADs. Labeling SCAD research as “conspiracy theory” is an effective method of preventing ongoing investigations from being reported in the corporate media and keep them outside of broader public scrutiny.

    Psychologist Laurie Manwell, University of Guelph, addresses the psychological advantage that SCAD actors hold in the public sphere. Manwell, writing in American Behavioral Scientist (Sage 2010) states, “research shows that people are far less willing to examine information that disputes, rather than confirms, their beliefs . . . pre-existing beliefs can interfere with SCADs inquiry, especially in regards to September 11, 2001.”

    Professor Steven Hoffman… “Our data shows substantial support for a cognitive theory known as ‘motivated reasoning,’ which suggests that rather than search rationally for information that either confirms or disconfirms a particular belief, people actually seek out information that confirms what they already believe. In fact, for the most part people completely ignore contrary information.”

    Credible scientific evidence brings into question the possibility that some aspects of the events of 9/11 involved State Crimes Against Democracy. Psychologically this is a very hard concept for Americans to even consider.

    However, ignoring the issue in the context of multiple proven SCADs since World War II seems far more dangerous for democracy than the consequences of future scientific inquiry and transparent, fact-based investigative reporting. Anything short of complete, open discourse based on all the evidence about these critical issues in our society relating to the possible continuation of SCADs is simply a matter of censorship…

    Abstract snipped from:
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17922

    • 55 drkate March 4, 2010 at 2:28 pm

      Thank you d2i. This is very informative and a perfect description of what I am talking about here–state crimes against the American people played for political gain and power.

  27. 56 Pam March 4, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    As long as there are questions concerning these issues we will never be free. The answers are out there we just need to make them available for all to see, I am sure there are some Kool-Aid drinkers that still won’t call the kettle black, no pun intended. Please keep talking we are all looking for the answers and ways to share the info with others. I wish this had spell check my typing is terrible.

  28. 57 JJ March 5, 2010 at 7:42 am

    http://propagandamatrix.com/mother_of_all_lies_about_911.html

    ‘Mother of all Lies’ about 9/11, Barbara Olson’s “phone call” from Flight 77

    • 58 andyp March 5, 2010 at 9:40 am

      I saw Ted Olsen on Larry King Live – for one hour – speaking of this. He certainly seemed broken. The author doesn’t mention this. And where is Barbara and how did she so conveniently die at the right time?

  29. 59 drkate March 5, 2010 at 1:13 pm

    Thank you, Lame Cherry…this is a MUST read for confirmation of elements of this post…

    http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-creates-your-pain.html

  30. 60 JJ March 5, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    andyp
    March 5, 2010 at 9:40 am

    You must accept these facts Andy for this argument……
    1)try a cell above 10,000 feet..all techs will tell you it’s impossible due to the pinging off towers due to the speed and altitude of the plane…
    2)if she called ‘collect’ that means she didn’t have a credit card for charges; and if she didn’t have a credit card for charges, how did she initiate the plane phone in the first place to call collect??? No operator available until credit card scanned.

    He isn’t disrespecting his wife’s memory; he was just part of the cover-up probably for lots of money…….LOTS OF MONEY!!

  31. 61 JJ March 5, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    Have you ever thought about the fact that it takes longer to write a bill than it takes to read it? And if no one had the time to read it before voting on it, then how did anyone have the time to write it? It stands to reason that the Patriot Act has a lot in common with the “Stimulus” bill that was passed last year…

    The same must be true for the 2000+ page deathcare bill…ya think??

  32. 62 JJ March 5, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    I started this post talking about a bridge that I had to cross. I frankly don’t care if people are ’surprised’ that I could come to this conclusion. I had not intended to end up here. I try to be intellectually honest, as well as honest in my dealings. That sense will not allow me to ignore these issues.

    Dr. Kate, you crossed the bridge to the land of confusion, doubt, and betrayal, a land in which many of us made our homes the minute facts didn’t jive, the day common sense kicked in.

  33. 63 redhank March 5, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    I’m sorry, I have so much respect for you guys…but I worked in 7 World Trade Center….for several years before this happened and was displaced afterwards…It was let burn down…by choice…by Guiliani…It was smart…why divert rescue people to a building that was already evacuated (we did not lose anyone)..I was a senior person and was kept informed as to the status all day…The reason being that I was in Buenos Aires that day and thus able to speak to other senior management in touch with the authorities as local cell communication was cut off…Look…I think it is difficult to go down the line to major conspiracy across lines…

    • 64 drkate March 5, 2010 at 7:06 pm

      Thank you for that information. I would like to see that out there, it seems so many ‘used’ the tragedy for their own purposes.

    • 65 drkate March 5, 2010 at 9:35 pm

      Hank, are you telling me that the collapse of WT7 was by fire? set from within? No smoke, no flames, no plane in WT7. It collapsed just like the othr buildings into its foundation at 5:30 in the afternoon, more than 6 hours after the attack.

  34. 66 Pamela Gentry January 20, 2012 at 8:20 pm

    1. The St. Valentine’s Day Massacre
    Conclusion: Al Capone planned the hit

    2. The Death Of Thelma Todd
    Conclusion: Gangster Lucky Luciano had her murdered

    3. The Death Of George Reeves
    Conclusion: Eddie Mannix had him murdered

    4. The Death Of Marilyn Monroe
    Conclusion: The Kennedys had the Mafia silence her

    5. The John F. Kennedy Assassiantion
    Conclusion: The Mafia hired French assassins to kill JFK. The CIA covered it up. The Warren Commission had nothing to do with the conspiracy. They were just given wrong information. Lee Harvey Oswald was a CIA agent. He was framed.

    6. The Robert F. Kennedy Assassination
    RFK was killed in a hotel being run by the Mafia. The Mafia had the CIA kill RFK and the LAPD cover it up. Eugene Thane Cesar shot RFK from behind. Sirhan Sirhan was drugged by some CIA people.

    The Martin Luther King Assassination
    James Earl Ray was involved in a conspiracy to kill King. Ray was payed by unknown conspiractors to shoot King.


  1. 1 C/P drkatesview: A Conspiracy of Silence | T-Room Trackback on March 3, 2010 at 1:20 pm
  2. 2 Taking Stock « drkatesview Trackback on March 3, 2010 at 11:25 pm
Comments are currently closed.



March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,672,333 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 607 other followers

%d bloggers like this: