Removing Obama

©2010 drkate

[Update: Obama and Congress waive right to respond to petition for writ in Kerchner Case.]

Now that the Obama-socialist-democrat-dominated House and Senate has had a log thrown in its tracks, and is in disarray, it is an opportune moment to review and regroup in ferreting out the strategies to remove Obama based on his lack of eligibility. Having lost his first layer of protection, and potentially his NWO backing, Obama’s eligibility shield has cracks that can only get larger, if we widen them effectively.

Make no mistake, we are facing a corrupt judiciary, one which has scorned this constitutional question and laughed at avoiding it.  We understand that the entire Congress willfully ignored their oath of office while others actively committed fraud against the American people and the 50 states.  The fraud is deep and widespread, which means that we the people are going to have to enforce the constitution, and make them enforce it.

A variety of methods have been discussed to remove Obama, all of them Constitutional.  The major criteria for for evaluating any of these options should include:

  • which option provides for the invalidation of all of his actions, appointments and laws signed?
  • which option provides for immediate relief?
  • which option will provide for a definition of ‘natural born citizen’, or provide a pathway to a definition?
  • is there any option that would prevent prosecution of Obama for the numerous crimes committed during his candidacy and occupation of the White House?

The Supreme Court

The Kerchner versus Obama & Congress Case.  A petition for writ of certiorari has been docketed in the Supreme Court, and a decision on whether to accept, reject, or delay a decision based on the Justice Department’s request for more time was due on Wednesday, November 3.  Because the Supreme Court operates on paper for this type of proceeding, the decision either way should be known by Friday at the earliest.

Recall that Kerchner and Apuzzo have produced the most extensive historical record on the meaning of ‘natural born citizen’, and have articulated that material within their briefs as this case has moved through the court system.  In contrast, Obama has argued a straw man case on standing and court jurisdiction–a pattern, I might add, in most of the Justice department cases right now.  Obama has not submitted any substantive material to defend himself.  Obama’s and the Court’s silence is tacit admission that the facts presented are true.

Taking the case will allow for the definition of natural born citizen, and, in my opinion, would either directly result in the removal of Obama or indirectly through subsequent action of Congress, if directed by the Court to apply its definition and investigate.  This is also an option that could produce an immediate resignation by Obama for other reasons than the exposure of his background.  If he is removed pursuant to a Supreme Court decision, Congress would be obliged to review and rescind all executive actions and laws signed.

I doubt that the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ will be remanded back to the Federal Appeals court, or to Congress but the investigation may be.  Any appeals court or Congressional definition would of necessity be reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Thus, a Supreme Court review of the Kerchner case meets most of the criteria identified above:  it produces a definition of ‘natural born citizen’, it forces the removal of Obama and allows for the review and rescinding of his actions and laws signed. Is it immediate relief?  Not if the usurper is allowed to serve while the Supreme Court is reviewing his case.  Is the removal of Obama immediate in this option? It could be if it was taken seriously by the Court.

Prosecution after removal from office, including the crime of fraudulently holding the office of the President, remain unconstrained by the statute of limitations.  Even if he resigns to escape a Supreme Court review

Additional thoughts on the Supremes

The uncomfortable position of the Supremes right now make the Kerchner case THE test of how far the corruption/infiltration and takeover has gone.  Chief ‘Justice’ John Roberts did not flub the oath by accident, nor did Obama.  Like children, they couldn’t believe they were getting away with it.  Then what followed was at least one additional swearing in ceremony without a bible and out of the public view.

In addition, Obama compromised the Justices when he visited them on January 14, 2009; all but Justice Alito were in the room.

The decision of the Supreme Court to take the case or not, in my view, also involves Obama’s ‘protection’ –whether it is the diminished democrats, his financiers, the CIA, the european banksters, or some combination.  And where I make the leap with the Supreme Court is to assume that at least one if not several Justices are part of, serving, or bought by these NWO types.  In my opinion, if the agenda of the NWO is too exposed or in jeopardy by Obama’s incompetence, his protection is lost and the Supreme Court will take the case.

And, it is always possible that they will take the case because they understand their duty to uphold the constitution, and suddenly find their courage and honor.

But what if they don’t grant the petition?  How angry are millions of us going to be?  Is this why Obama is skedaddling out of the country?

Resignation

Several factors and more than a few rumors suggest that resignation is an immediate option for Obama. Any number of factors could produce a resignation:

  • Trying to avoid prosecution for high crimes and misdemeanors, eligibility, or impeachment;
  • A subpoena from the House requiring a birth certificate or resignation by a date certain
  • Forced by his handlers to resign for ‘personal’ or ‘health’ reasons
  • A move by his Cabinet or the Democrats to remove him
  • The Supreme Court takes the Kerchner case

Timing of any resignation is important to meeting the criterion of a solution which allows the repeal of every action he has taken.  For example if he resigns before the Supreme Court hears the Kerchner case, will the case still be heard and definition of NBC determined? And can or will  Congress review and repeal his actions? Resignation will not result in a definition of natural born citizen if all the cases are dropped.

Resignation for health or mental duress reasons could potentially complicate further investigations of Obama; but ‘insanity’ is ruled out by this author because of his narcissism; it is only a possibility if his handlers decide so or Obama’s underlying mental illness takes over from his controlled drugged state.

According this report, the chaos in the White House is even worse than reported by the ‘insider’ stories of the last few weeks.  It reports that

President Obama was urged by the few White House insiders from whom he still takes advice to leave the country on his ten-day Asian trip, his longest trip abroad since becoming president, in order to not inflict any more damage to the Democratic Party in the wake of one of the worst electoral defeats for the party of an incumbent president in recent history.

I’m not sure about that, but other statements in this report are interesting in that they point out an effort to get Obama to overreact in public so the ground is laid for removal of Obama.

The 25th Amendment

There has been much recent discussion of the use of the 25th Amendment to remove Obama.  Section 4 of the Amendment requires the Vice President and a majority of the cabinet to make the declaration to the President Pro-Tempore of the Senate  (Dan Inoyue, D-Hi) and Speaker of the House that the President is unable to discharge his duties.  The Vice President immediately acts as President.  What happens after the invoking of the 25th Amendment provides more insight into who, and how a decision would be made on the next President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

The fundamental disability which prevents Obama from discharging his duties, in my opinion,  is that he is illegally occupying the White House.  Using that disability to remove Obama under the 25th Amendment, however, exposes the entire Cabinet and all the succeeding officials to charges of fraud–they have all served under him and supported him for two years.

The public call by LaRouche to invoke the 25th Amendment under the rubric of  mental disability is enhanced by the ‘insider’ reports on the chaos in the White House and Obama’s instability. Most recently Wayne Madsen reports confirm the ‘insider’ information:

Top Democrats are still reeling from Obama’s bizarre behavior at a $7500-a-plate fundraiser at a stately mansion at Brown University in Rhode Island on October 25. The fundraiser, organized by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, was supposed to highlight Democratic Party unity…Obama briefly appeared at the fundraiser at Brown University, where Democratic loyalists paid $7500 to hear Obama speak, but departed after only twenty minutes, telling the assembled guests that he had to go back to the White House to “tuck in my daughters, walk the dog, and ‘scoop the poop.’” The Democratic faithful were appalled and shocked at Obama’s quick departure and one of the three reasons he gave for it: to scoop up dog turds as if the President of the United States actually performs such tasks with a phalanx of White House staff and Secret Service agents at his disposal.

Madsen reports that ex-CIA agents are scouring the globe for information and will release it selectively so as to provoke a response from Obama that would lay the foundation in American minds that Obama is not fit to serve. Madsen:

However, Biden and other Democratic and administration do believe that if Obama were to display some of the same reckless behavior publicly as many White House personnel have witnessed privately, there may be wide support for enactment of the provisions of the 25th Amendment. Such a public display by Obama that could trigger succession action might involve a public outburst, including the use of foul language or a statement that Obama believes there is a conspiracy against him.

The disability of the 25th Amendment was almost invoked in 1987 when President Reagan showed the first signs of Alzheimers.

Does the 25th Amendment Meet the Criteria?

Removing Obama through the 25th Amendment involves either using (a) his ineligibility for the office, or (b) his mental incapacity.  Certainly the eligibility issue, and perhaps a definition an affirmation of natural born citizen will be resolved, and all legislation, actions, and directions of Obama would be null and void after a full Congressional hearing and action. But hundreds of people go down if they all suddenly admit he is not eligible…no “I didn’t know” excuse will pass muster.

Do any of them have the courage to face their complicity?

If removed by the 25th Amendment by reason of mental disability, and absent any other pathway (e.g., the Supreme Court), Obama’s onerous acts would not necessarily be null and void…each would have to be steadily repealed by an increasingly American-dominated Congress.

Impeachment

A President can be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, including violating his duties like enforcing immigration laws, with impeachment proceedings initiated in the House, and then either convicted or acquitted in the Senate.  Clinton was impeached but not convicted; Nixon resigned before he could be impeached.

The trail of investigations on Obama would be bound to lead to impeachment, but, as we all have stated here, impeachment is for real presidents.  Obama is a usurper.  Congress would love to drag out investigations as ‘pay back’, and frankly to continue to keep their positions and posture for 2012, leaving Obama to squirm.  Congress should not be allowed to waste time, and should be cognizant that as long as the democrats still control the senate he will not be convicted.

Important research of Mario Apuzzo uncovered the Congressional Research Service ‘talking points’ delivered to Congress instructing how to respond to the public’s questions about eligibility.  Which ever member of Congress requested that paper should be identified, and we all need to let Congress know that we know.  Give them a copy of their own memo, and see how they respond.  They know Obama is ineligible, so don’t waste time on hearings that may or may not lead to impeachment.

Impeachment proceedings would meet none of the criteria above, especially identifying Obama as a usurper, the definition of natural born citizen, and the nullification of all his actions.

Impeachment proceedings could be applied to Supreme Court Justices, however, and leaders of Congress not only for their regular crimes, but for the crime of enabling Obama to seize the White House.

Removal by Arrest

There are several scenarios that I envision could lead to his arrest, which would remove him from office but not define natural born citizen nor necessarily nullify Obama’s actions while occupying the White House.  These include:

  • Espionage.  I can’t imagine the National Security Agency doesn’t also have his blackberry and other communications monitored; nor that a secret service agent hasn’t overheard something; or that another country is not aware of Obama’s foreign status.  He could be caught in the act and arrested on the spot.
  • The mail fraud, impersonation, social security/identity theft, and campaign cash fraud would result in his arrest, if it ever got to a court that would hear it, and if so, Obama would have left office to defend himself from the charges, paying for his own attorney.
  • Failure to follow a Supreme Court or Congressional order to vacate the office.  The ghost of Honduras bad-mouthing returns– Obama would have to be arrested and with military assistance.

A Must Do

The removal of Obama must be a top priority along with our efforts to rebuild a constitutional congress and to clean the house and senate of anti-American members.

The danger of not addressing eligibility is the precedent it sets, and with scoundrels like Orrin Hatch in the Senate, we would see Bobby Jindhal or Schwartzenegger as the 2012 republican nominee.  Allowing Obama to remain in office without a peep on eligibility is amending the Constitution by fiat.

Not on my watch.

134 Responses to “Removing Obama”


  1. 1 Jan November 5, 2010 at 9:08 pm

    Fantastic article, Dr. K, as usual. Great research!!!
    I had a thought, what if pelosi was arrested for falsely putting obat on the ballot, Hilary for knowing what was going on when she was removed from the race, McCain for not requesting that obama show his proof, since McCain was ordered to do so?
    Do you suppose they would then keep their mouths shut?

    There is not one single person in Congress/Senate that does not know what is going on. Each person was served with documents from American Grand Jury early 2010 and again by Neal Turner just recently.

    • 2 heather November 5, 2010 at 10:54 pm

      I think when 1 sings they bring others down with them, after all they aren’t going down alone.

    • 3 drkate November 5, 2010 at 11:41 pm

      I meant to put in the article that very thing Jan–Pelosi is really Obama’s Al Capone..arrest her for fraud and the story comes out big time.

      • 4 eddie h. November 5, 2010 at 11:56 pm

        that is exactly what i have believed and have said for almost 18 months. i do not get it why nancy pelosi is not being brought down. i totally agree if she was arrested and charged obama would crumble and then many many others would also crumble. i see her as the main key to break things open.

        • 5 drkate November 6, 2010 at 12:02 am

          Yes, she is caught dead to rights on election fraud, researched by jbjd (on blogroll) and summarized here:

          http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/nancy-pelosi-is-obamas-al-capone/

          • 6 MeJane November 10, 2010 at 4:28 pm

            I fully agree, lets hope and pray Pelosi does not remain the Democratic minority leader of the house and is replaced as by another. That would leave her extremely vulnerable to attack, which I presume is why she is still seeking that leadership role. I take heart in the fact that she is no longer in the line of Presidential sucession, which makes her the perfect one to go after. The 2010 elections have shifted the Presidential sucession, if Obama and complicit Company were removed I believe Boehnner, as speaker of the house, would be the next in line (who is not wildly complicit)and would be President temporarily.

  2. 7 tiger 7 November 5, 2010 at 10:02 pm

    A great summary—You do your country a tremendous service. The elements of removal are certainly present and now there are avenues for their pursuit. The WH kettle is indeed bubbling and the Supreme Court will have to address the Kerchner case one way or another. If they punt on it, they will have to answer to some angry citizens. There are enough new, unencumbered, members of Congress now that have few if any strings attached and will speak out.
    We’re not there yet, butthings are looking up big time!!

  3. 8 Jan November 5, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    Dr. K, I just heard that all the Bankers headed for Jekyl Island when obat left for India. Are Congress/Senate out of town also?

    Is the east coast empty?

    • 9 Quantum Leap November 5, 2010 at 10:22 pm

      :shock: Not surprised. Something is up. He took his kids out of school and even his M in L is going. They built a tunnel for him to travel through so he could visit the museum of Ghandi or whatever you call it. :?:

      • 10 heather November 5, 2010 at 11:00 pm

        QL–It’s a major Holiday for the Indians—like our Christmas. My neighbors are visiting family in India and thats the message I got today from them–I emailed them to ask what the tempo was over there and was told that it’s very quiet because it’s there holiday season, like our Christmas.

        Now why would Barry go to India during their holiday season?

    • 11 The Obama Timeline author November 5, 2010 at 10:26 pm

      The lame-duck session of Congress does not start until November 15. I assume that many members of Congress will take some time off before returning to Washington, D.C. I am not certain, but the Capitol Building may be quite empty right about now.

      I am a lifelong resident of Chicago and its suburbs until recently, and I am quite familiar with Obama’s background. I have spent over 3,000 hours researching his history. The Obama Timeline, at http://www.colony14.net, contains over 2,000 pages of evidence against the thug-in-chief and over 15,000 references. Volume I, which covers his birth through his first 100 days in office, is in print. Volume II picks up where Volume I left off, and is available online. It is updated on a daily basis. If you cannot find what you are looking for in the Timeline, let me know and I will make sure it is added.

      • 12 Ali November 6, 2010 at 4:46 am

        Have any of you read Volume I of obama timeline? I have not. What has this author written re o’s birth and childhood/family? Do any of you know?

        • 13 Bob F. in IL November 6, 2010 at 7:49 am

          In the interest of full disclosure, I will first say that I am one of the author’s brothers. I have read the book and can say that if you are interested in learning more about Obama, you will be amazed with how much information this book contains. The detail is incredible, there are literally thousands of references (most available online so that you can read the original material yourself), and yet it reads like a suspense thriller.

      • 14 drkate November 6, 2010 at 12:33 pm

        Thank you for commenting here, and for your terrific site. Thanks for the offer of assistance…and yes, I have a question about your perspective on Obama’s flotilla to Indonesia and India…is it to ‘get him out of the country’, or to achieve some big deal over there, or to distract from something here? If you have any insight it would be greatly appreciated!

        • 15 heather November 6, 2010 at 3:35 pm

          DRK–just heard from my neighbors who are in India visiting family–the husband wrote that most everything is quiet, but they are hearing that he is over there on arms deals, business deals between countries and nothing about war ships at all. Apparently everything is hush hush–oh and nothing about that tunnel that our military is building for him to visit the ghandi museum.

          My neighbors are highly educated here in America and their family is very well to do over there..so they would know something.

          Anyway just wanted to update the India trip as of today–doesn’t mean that something different won’t go down tomorrow!

    • 16 heather November 5, 2010 at 10:57 pm

      Heard that too–it’s time for the Bilderbergs to be brought down too and eliminate their poison placed on not only America but the entire world. After all they are the NWO……

  4. 17 Army D.A.V. November 5, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    No court has ruled he is eligible .

    Only hearsay evidence has been provided by his defense.

    If we could drag Apuzzo’s pending Supreme Court case over to the attention of lawyers on the Lakin’s case to use as a defense in the Courts-martial .

    How could they prosecute Lakin while eligibility issue is still on Supreme Court docket and hasn’t been ruled on yet ?.

    Just thinking out loud……….

  5. 19 Quantum Leap November 5, 2010 at 10:18 pm

    OT
    WASHINGTON – Self-proclaimed tea party leader Michele Bachmann’s bid for a top Republican post in the House received a cool reaction Thursday from Speaker-to-be John Boehner, an early test of how GOP leaders will treat the antiestablishment movement’s winners in Tuesday’s elections.

    “Constitutional conservatives deserve a loud and clear voice in leadership!” Bachmann, R-Minn., who founded the Tea Party Caucus, said in a one-paragraph Facebook announcement that she is running for GOP conference chairman.

    THEY BETTER GIVE THIS TO HER INSTEAD OF SOME UNKNOWN. SHE GAVE US A VOICE. TEA PARTY IS NOT JUST ALL REPUBLICANS. SHE GOT THE INDY SUPPORT AND UNAFFILIATED VOTER SUPPORT OR DISENFRANCHISED DEMS. WITHOUT HER THIS ELECTION WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN AS GOOD. THEY BETTER REMEMBER THAT THIS IS ABOUT AMERICA AND NOT ABOUT REPUBLICANS. VOTING THEM IN WAS JUST A STRATEGY. BOTH PARTIES ARE COLLECTIVISTS. IF BOEHNER FLIPS ON US HE’S NEXT TO GET THE BOOT IN 2012.

    • 20 heather November 5, 2010 at 11:04 pm

      QL-I wonder if Boehner got “a talking to” by Barry?? They all know that Michelle Bachmann is the one that should be speaker so why aren’t they giving it to her after all, she is clean from all of these criminals!

  6. 21 The Obama Timeline author November 5, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    Jeb Hensarling may get the leadership post Bachmann wants, but she would be a good number two. Hensarling is a solid conservative. He is certainly not as well known as Bachmann, but I would not be disappointed if he gets the spot. Don’t worry – she will remain an outspoken supporter of liberty.

  7. 22 Troy November 5, 2010 at 10:37 pm

    It seems to me that the SCOTUS no longer has the option of hearing the eligibility case on it’s merits.

    If they hear it then they have to rule on it…If they rule that Obama is a NBC and is therefore eligible, then they would have committed judicial fraud and trampled on the constitution out in broad daylight for the whole world to see…I think they would be very hesitant to do that.

    If they rule that Obama is indeed ineligible because he doesn’t meet the criteria of being an Article II NBC, then they are admitting that they have all committed and are guilty of treason for not hearing the Donofrio or Wrotnowski cases, which would have prevented the usurpation/crime from being committed – especially Chief Justice Roberts since he is the one that swore in Obama….Ruling on the case in Kerchner’s favor would be the equivalent of digging their own graves.

    The only real opportunity they had to settle the NBC eligibility issue was through Donofrio’s or Wrotnowski’s cases, since either would have been ruled on BEFORE Obama was sworn in…They reviewed both of those case briefs in conference and knew that Leo had the issue nailed down tight as a drum, but they didn’t have the balls to accept the case….They instead chose dereliction of duty resulting in treason.

    So, if they hear Kerchner’s case then they have to either admit that they intentionally committed treason or they will have to take a piss on the constitution in broad daylight for the entire world to see.

    They have only one option and that is to NOT hear the case.

    • 23 heather November 5, 2010 at 11:07 pm

      I would say that the SCOTUS has put themselves between a rock and a hard place all on their own — by themselves…now let them do the right thing and if we the people continue to push and prod they will have to remove him.

      • 24 Army D.A.V. November 6, 2010 at 12:33 am

        Possible opening for SCOTUS to cover their a$$, no cases were referred from lower courts or Congress .

        There are two ways in which a case can be referred to the Supreme Court. The first is a direct appeal from the lower federal courts if a constitutional issue is deemed to be involved.

        The second way is by petitioning for a writ of certiorari. This means that the records of a case in a lower federal court are sent to the Supreme Court for review. Such a writ can only be granted with the agreement of four justices of the Supreme Court.

        The first proper and only writ of certiorari filed and it’s on the docket.

        The last straw .

        Yea, I know it’s reaching ………

        • 25 drkate November 6, 2010 at 12:41 am

          Good point tho, it has to be a ‘properly presented’ case, and ‘ripe’…none of the other cases were. All were premature. so it is an opening for a$$-covering.

          • 26 Army D.A.V. November 6, 2010 at 1:14 am

            Also

            The Supreme Court does not have the power to initiate its own cases.

            The Supreme Court does not have the ability to enforce its rulings.

            So they could also spin some of this around and mix in some legal BS with a little shake and bake ,,,,

            Maybe throw Pelosi and Hawaii State Department of Health into the mix.

    • 28 drkate November 5, 2010 at 11:47 pm

      Agreed. As Papoose asked of Roberts: what is the penalty for a Justice who knowingly swore in an ineligible President?

      It is THE test.

      I think they would have to submit to impeachment proceedings after they ruled!

      • 29 tfb November 6, 2010 at 3:13 am

        They think by deliberately screwing up the oath, it didn’t “stick”, he probably swore an oath to the Kremlin and NWO.

        Also Dr. Kate, Arizona’s ARS 16-311 already on the books requires candidates prove they are qualified before balloting, and all Obama showed was an affidavit and the SoS admits he never fulfilled 16-311. Then Judy Burges came out with a bogus distraction bill requiring candidates to prove their citizenship, but that was already covered in 16-311 so it was just diversionary. Her bill was rejected, so it makes it look like there’s no requirement with Arizona to vet candidates, but there still is.
        The Attorney General office just gives the run around when asked who is supposed to enforce their laws. Brewer’s office defers to SoS and AG. Both Burges and Brewer are (R) and the SoS is (D).
        Now that Obama is suing Arizona it would be quite simple for Brewer to insist 16-311 was enforced but she won’t do it, which spells out she is working WITH Obama as more controlled opposition—as hard as that is to stomach, when the rubber meets the road she is not winning at all costs, she’s capitulating to fraud that she is clearly aware of.

      • 30 Ginger November 6, 2010 at 1:45 pm

        drkate

        Roberts swore in the so called Christan Obama and later under the darkness of night (wink) had to swear in the Muslim Obama with his hand on the koran instead of the Bible! They had to cover their rears! hahaha

        • 31 drkate November 6, 2010 at 2:01 pm

          I know, it was very interesting.

          Now Obama is rolling the dice–he waived his right to respond to the Kerchner petition…probably thinking it was not ripe for decision. We’ll see.

          • 32 Papoose November 7, 2010 at 7:49 am

            Is there any way we can access official records as respects the 2nd Oath? Was the pubic/ required Oath actually deemed invalid? Who initiated the second installation? Is it the historic content documented somewhere?

            If the official Oath administered on January 20, 2009 was faulty for some reason, then why was it not re-administered in pubic? Which Oath are we being governed under? Under which Oath are the Military carrying out orders?

            What was the purpose for the second oath and what were the specific circumstances causing the private remedy?

            Was the pubic “swearing in” deemed null and void?

            Why did they treat the private “swearing in” as a news blurb and not an historical event?

            In what annals will we find this official national event recorded?

            Who disputed the validity of the pubic Oath and who decided it would be best to “do it over” behind closed doors?

            What makes the second hidden Oath bear authority?

            which one is considered the Oath of Office for the installation of the 44th President of the United States?

            Transposing an adjective doesn’t fly as a reason, and if that is the case, how do we know the second one wasn’t faulty? Did the second oath replace the public vow?

            If it was one of the first acts of official business under the new administration who decided it would be moot matter, just a thingy “we” needed to do?

            Who is “we?”

            • 33 Ginger November 7, 2010 at 8:54 am

              Papoose

              Thank you…well stated! Maybe Issa should get his subpoena ready! Can we get it, by the way of “Freedom of Information Act” ???? What happened in that private swearing in?

              • 34 Papoose November 7, 2010 at 12:02 pm

                This is where I think things went astray at the get-go Heather. It didn’t smell right then — plus — it served to affirm SCOTUS’ acceptance by reinforcing the scam.

                It came across to me as Shut up and sit down, You The People of the United States of America.

                That second Oath was out of bounds. Sneaks.

  8. 35 bill November 6, 2010 at 3:13 am

    Just my opinion,but Democrat,Republican,Independent etc. has absolutely nothing to do,with the plight Americans find themselves in.First,Last and Foremost,Our Constitution is the only thing that can save America.All the rest is just an exercise in futility.cheers

  9. 36 Dora November 6, 2010 at 6:38 am

    We thought we would hear from the court by Friday. That was yesterday.
    Does anybody know if the SUPREMES took the case?
    Has the court mentioned what cases are coming up?
    I am frustrated and confused. Each time I think we are getting close, everything gets silent again.
    Nobody in the media seems to know anything!

  10. 39 no-nonsense-nancy November 6, 2010 at 9:53 am

    Dr. Kate, a great essay again. If they don’t take the case we need to go to DC IN FORCE and stand outside the Supreme Court building and demand that they hear it!! We the People simply cannot stand by and allow this to happen! I know this is a big country and traveling can be difficult for many but we need a very big force to show that we mean business.

    By the way, I love the way you put the picture of Alcatraz next to the section on arresting Omanure. Very cool.

    We need to all contact our repub congress critters and tell them in no uncertain terms that they are very lucky to have the majority now that they have and they need to address the ineligibility issue and get him arrested pronto!!

  11. 40 tiger 7 November 6, 2010 at 10:05 am

    The Pilosi angle is very interesting—I only hope she does try for the minority position in the House. She has caused enough Dem. angst to precipitate retaliation. She does not have the protection that bho has had and very likely will be exposed for at least a few of her misdeeds. And I agree, she won’t go down alone–there’s too much dirt on too many people.
    Also, I don’t think for a minute that we have heard the last of our buddy Blago.

  12. 41 Bob November 6, 2010 at 10:27 am

    Dr. Kate,

    This is important, the Congressional Research Service memo to Congress has been leaked. It is the document that Congress has apparently been using to reply to their constituents who inquire about Obama’s elgibility. It is why all the replies from various offices have been identical, or nearly so. It is 14 pages of BS with one page discussing, to paraphase, the fact that there is NO vetting of presidential candidates, and no federal laws requiring it be done, at least not according to this memo.

    It is featured on Mario Apuzzo’s website:

    Mario’s website with article on Congressional Memo, schroll down to article:

    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

    Direct link to scribd with 14 page Memo:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/Members-of-Congress-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-in-Answer-to-Obama-Eligibility-Questions

    • 42 drkate November 6, 2010 at 10:32 am

      I think we need to find out who requested the memo, and who wrote it, because this is clearly illegal. I am drafting a FOIA request this weekend.

    • 43 tfb November 6, 2010 at 11:59 am

      The 20th amendment requires vetting, which was not done, except for McCain. Legally he is not president at all without 20th amendment qualification.

  13. 44 tiger 7 November 6, 2010 at 11:13 am

    Truely, the memo is BS—It’s maddening to have to put up with such , but until the new Congress is sworn in,
    all we can do is what we are doing now. As we have said, until control of the House is achieved in January, we can’t raise the issue officialy.The social democrats would ignore the Constitution as they did on obamacare et al.
    It’s too bad the problem wasn’t addressed prior to Jan. ’08, but the whole scheme was somewhat beyond imagination then—now we know.

    • 45 eddie h. November 6, 2010 at 12:28 pm

      in my view we need to also pressure democrats now. they will not continue to support obama if he is pulling them down. the socialists will demand he put up eligibility proof or resign. if they can prevent it they will not let obama destroy the whole party. i do not believe we should just sit and wait until next january and rely solely on the republicans. many things can happen before next january.

  14. 47 Bob November 6, 2010 at 11:31 am

    From Mario’s website on who ordered the CRS memo on Obama’s eligibility:

    P.S. The Congressional Research Service is part of the Library of Congress. It theoretically works for the Congressional Committees which means IT WORKS FOR THE PARTY THAT CONTROLS CONGRESS (in this case the Progressive controlled Democratic Party). Every report they issue (on the request of COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN who want them), is slanted to the ideology of the committee in charge because lawyers are partisan. 90% of them on this project are liberal. They are the same lawyers the White House used to research their legal position in the fight to kill the Citizens United lawsuit when they fought McCain Feingold …
    L. Paige Whitaker, Legislative Attorney; Erika K. Lunder, Legislative Attorney;
    Kate M. Manuel, Legislative Attorney; Jack Maskell, Legislative Attorney; Michael V. Seitzinger, Legislative Attorney

    I added….

    The Congressional Research Service has been around for a long time. They write documents for Congress on many subjects, some are in the public domain, and some are not:

    Check this:

    http://www.loc.gov/crsinfo/

    http://opencrs.com/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Research_Service

    Bob

  15. 49 drkate November 6, 2010 at 11:45 am

    OT–sort of…Mind Control in America

    • 50 Ginger November 7, 2010 at 10:10 am

      The mind control like Pelosi, Reid, Burtha, Kennedy, Kerry, Shumer, MSM, that came out constantly before the camera BASHING everything that President Bush did do or didn’t do! I always said here there they go again trying to brain wash people against President Bush and I feel that I was right. Just like now look how hateful the media was and is towards Sarah Palin and others whom they fear! They have to brain wash people into believing they are not what they appear to be. They have brain washed a lot of people to make them believe that the republicans are evil and they are not!

      We must take down the media and their propaganda! Amen

      Wake up people!

      Do not fear evil.
      Recognize it.
      Confront it.
      Defeat it.

  16. 51 drkate November 6, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    OT, sort of again…

    Good Riddance:

  17. 54 no-nonsense-nancy November 6, 2010 at 12:20 pm

    Another reason to get hm out of office as soon as possible.

    Why did this president choose to ignore the victims of the Fort Hood massacre on the one-year anniversary of one of the worst mass shootings ever on an American military base.

    In Mumbai he memorialized the terrorist attacks there in 2009 but completely ignored that yesterday was the 1st anniversary of the attacks at Fort Hood. A very good article on this subject in Canada Free Press today.

    http://www.canadafreepress.com

    STOP THEM COLD!!
    ARREST THE CRIMINALS!!

  18. 55 Royal Hotel November 6, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Thank you been looking for this information.

  19. 56 drkate November 6, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    Live LaRouche audio–

    http://www.larouchepac.com/files/asx/webcast_live_en_lo.asx

    archive will be here
    http://www.larouchepac.com/webcasts/20101106.html

    (why, on his website, is he bragging about giving courses in Russia? Is he an agent… so many agents, so little time…)

    • 57 Renee November 7, 2010 at 10:12 pm

      drkate, Funny you mention this name. I was just working on it. Let me find it.

      • 58 Renee November 7, 2010 at 10:53 pm

        drkate, It starts here. Leza and I put together a list of the history of Chase Bank first, and you cannot believe how many names are in there that we have dug up even back to the TD days. Same names. I then went further in comments and did more digging on some of them. Leza is working this also. It looks unrelated but is. We have been working on all of this a long time. We believe these to be the more “factual” connections to our current situation.

        Please take the time to note all the names, as some of you have seen them all before. It is alot to comprehend unless you have been following the research, but is what it is. I am very sorry it is boring reading, and sorry also for posting the entire wiki links but I have had so much info disappear in almost 3 years that I post it all if I think it may be important later. Some is, some later is not. You just never know sometimes until later when something comes together.

        Let me know if you think this connects to your comment above.
        Sorry for the long comment.It begins here, but please read the entire, boring post of info, and comments as well. It is still in progress. It seems at a fast glance to be random information, but we believe it is much more.

        Spicy Stars or Sandcastles Powderpuffs and Stars 13 | We the People of the United States#comments#comments#comments#comments Renee | November 6, 2010 at 11:29 am | Reply
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Roche,_Baroness_Fermoy

        Renee | November 6, 2010 at 11:31 am | Reply
        Roach
        Rocha
        Ruth
        Can someone fill in Ruth pic and info here please ?

        Ruth Roche, Baroness Fermoy, DCVO, OBE, (2 October 1908 – 6 July 1993) was a friend and confidante of Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, and the maternal grandmother of Diana, Princess of Wales.

        [edit] Biography
        Lady Fermoy was born Ruth Sylvia Gill at her father’s house, Dalhebity, Bieldside, Aberdeenshire, the daughter of Colonel William Smith Gill and his wife, Ruth.[1] She showed early promise as a pianist and studied under Alfred Cortot at the Paris Conservatoire in the 1920s.[2]

        Her musical career was cut short when she met, and later married in 1931, the wealthy and much older Edmund Roche, 4th Baron Fermoy. Before he died in 1955, they had three children which included her middle child, Frances Ruth (the mother of Lady Diana Spencer). Lady Fermoy did play the piano in public occasionally after her marriage, most notably with Josef Krips at the Royal Albert Hall in 1950, and with Sir John Barbirolli and the Hallé Orchestra at King’s Lynn in 1966.[3] She founded the King’s Lynn Festival in 1951 and remained closely involved with the Festival for 25 years, persuading Queen Elizabeth to become its patron.[4]

        In 1956, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, appointed the Dowager Lady Fermoy an Extra Woman of the Bedchamber. The Queen Mother, being a widow herself, showed a preference for appointing widows to her household, and four years later Ruth, Lady Fermoy was promoted to Woman of the Bedchamber, a post she held for the next 33 years.[5]

        The Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy became confidantes and it was largely supposed that they engineered the match between Charles, Prince of Wales and Lady Fermoy’s granddaughter, Lady Diana Spencer. However, when asked about it, Lady Fermoy remarked, “You can say that if you like – but it simply wouldn’t be true”.[6] It was also said that she counselled her granddaughter against the marriage.[7]

        Lady Fermoy was a firm believer in the sanctity of marriage. In 1969, she testified against her own daughter’s fitness as a mother, thus allowing Edward Spencer, Viscount Althorp to retain custody of their children after the couple’s divorce.[2]

        Lady Fermoy died at her home, 36 Eaton Square, London,[8] aged 84. It was reported that she was not on speaking terms with Diana when she died.[2]

        [edit] References
        ^ Williamson, D The Ancestry of Lady Diana Spencer In: Genealogist’s Magazine, 1981; vol. 20 (no. 6) pp. 192-199 and vol. 20 (no. pp. 281-282
        ^ a b c The Times (London), Thursday, 8 July 1993; p. 4 col. D and p. 19 col. A
        ^ Vickers, Hugo (2006). Elizabeth: The Queen Mother. Arrow Books/Random House. p. 337. ISBN 9780099476627.
        ^ History of the King’s Lynn Festival
        ^ Mosley, C (ed.) Burke’s Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage, 107th edition (Burke’s Peerage and Gentry LLC, 2004) vol. I p. 1414
        ^ The Associated Press, 7 July 1993
        ^ Morton, Andrew, Diana: Her True Story (BCA, 1992) p. 55
        ^ Who’s Who, 1980 (Adam and Charles Black, London) p. 837
        Persondata
        Name Fermoy, Ruth Roche, Baroness
        Alternative names
        Short description
        Date of birth 2 October 1908
        Place of birth Bieldside, Aberdeenshire
        Date of death 6 July 1993
        Place of death 36 Eaton Square, London

        Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Roche,_Baroness_Fermoy”

  20. 63 Troy November 6, 2010 at 2:18 pm

    For the first time ever, a teleprompter will be used to address the Indian Parliment….They were amazed to find out that Obama was actually a stammering, blithering idiot without it…They were under the impression that he was a skilled orator, but soon found out that he was actually Porky Pig in disguise.

    ah-blee, ah-blee, ah-blee — That’s all folks!

    http://www.hindustantimes.com/Obama-to-use-teleprompter-for-Hindi-speech/H1-Article1-622605.aspx

  21. 66 Troy November 6, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    Ok, so Obama and Congress waive the right to respond to the petition for writ in Kerchner Case.

    Does this mean that they are just blowing it off because they feel/know that the SCOTUS will deny the petition and not hear the case?

    Is that what they’re thinking/knowing?

    • 67 drkate November 6, 2010 at 2:54 pm

      Options:

      –Arrogance
      –Rolling the dice–taking a risk, perhaps uninformed
      –they know something we don’t, expect a dismissal–i.e. sotomayor and kagan not recused
      –giving up, his protection is gone

      is this why he is out of the country, to protect himself from the millions that will go to DC and force the supremes to hear the case?

  22. 68 no-nonsense-nancy November 6, 2010 at 2:46 pm

    Parliament officials have had a busy week preparing for a red carpet welcome for Obama and his wife Michelle. Parliament House these days looks fresh with a new coat of paint, new carpeting and new green plants in mud vases decorating the corridors.

    Now isn’t that nice? All spiffed up for the imposter’s! Do they know that not only his speeches aren’t real but he himself isn’t?

    They should put THEM in a mud vase!

  23. 69 Bob November 6, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    What kind of website is the one below? I read some of the comments and it’s amazing how much hate those people have for someone who would dare to have the gall to ask for proof of Obama’s eligibility.

    Is it an Obot site or has Alinsky worked that well for the Obama regime?

    http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/11/unapologetic_birther_is_new_mo_house_of_representatives_majority_leader.php

  24. 72 Ted November 6, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    I have a suggestion:

    A group publicly announce that it definitely intends to file lawsuits in at least one, some, or all states, in the event BHO’s name were to appear on a 2012 POTUS general or primary election ballot, against the states’ Secretary of State or appropriate state official(s) challenging BHO being on said ballots, as not being a Natural Born Citizen.

    Just publicize the announcement.

    Obama is effectiviely finished.

    case closed

  25. 73 Ted November 6, 2010 at 5:56 pm

    What about announcing now that a number of states’ Secretary of States will be sued if someone who is not a Natural Born Citizen is listed on a 2012 POTUS primary or general election ballot.

    • 74 Troy November 6, 2010 at 6:19 pm

      Has already been done before he was elected…Every single court ruled that plaintiffs did not have “standing”

    • 75 Jan November 6, 2010 at 7:06 pm

      I researche state of Montana. The Sec. of State has no authority, they have to rely on what the Party presents and if the Party states the person is eligible then they have to put that person on the ballot.

      We are currently working with our state legislature to change the law for Montana. Next session is in January 2011.

  26. 76 Bob November 6, 2010 at 6:25 pm

    Maybe someone else knows more about this…but, I think there is a time frame in each state, prior to candidates being placed on the state ballot, when anyone can challenge the eligibility of any candidate. The time frame is, I believe, about 7-10 days. What we need to do is compile a list of the dates of this “window” in every state, and make sure there are challenges made in every state. Unless they are just going to say that Obama’s on-line COLB is proof he is an Article 2 Section 1 natural born citizen, then he will not be on the ballot in that state.

    If anyone has any additional information about this, please let us know.

    • 77 Jan November 6, 2010 at 7:46 pm

      It was proven by a court certified expert that the COLB posted by obat was a doctored document and not an original. Same with his Draft card.

  27. 78 Ted November 6, 2010 at 6:34 pm

    Troy, every state? all 50 states?

  28. 80 Ted November 6, 2010 at 6:49 pm

    Troy, I believe there certainly IS standing in at least some state courts, if done properly. Read this very recent law review article:

    http://www.michiganlawreview.org/articles/the-justiciability-of-eligibility-may-courts-decide-who-can-be-president

    • 81 Rosemary Woodhouse November 7, 2010 at 1:58 pm

      This” Standing” issue is a bunch of malarkey, and yet everyone says, oh, yes- “standing”! Are we not a government of the people, for the people and by the people? If so, each and everyone of us, as citizens of the Unites States of America has standing. This is like the Emperor who has no Clothes. Standing? I say bull!

  29. 82 Ted November 6, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    Troy and others, the below is an extract from the above law review article:

    “Although the possibility for state-court litigation of a presidential candidate’s eligibility may seem counterintuitive, there is a good reason for believing that this sort of dispute belongs in state court. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution provides: “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” In litigation surrounding the 2000 election, Bush’s legal team argued that the Florida Supreme Court violated this provision by failing to follow the Florida legislature’s instructions on post-election proceedings. Chief Justice Rehnquist’s concurring opinion in Bush v. Gore accepted this argument, concluding that the state supreme court’s construction of certain provisions of state election law went beyond the bounds of proper statutory interpretation. Yet none of the Justices disputed that state courts may hear cases alleging violations of state election statutes or that state courts generally possess the power to interpret and enforce those laws.

    “State-court litigation might proceed as a lawsuit seeking to keep a presidential candidate off the primary or general election ballot, on the ground that he or she does not satisfy the requisite qualifications. There exists some recent precedent for this type of case. In 2004, supporters of presidential candidate John Kerry brought a number of state-court actions seeking to deny Ralph Nader access to state ballots. In In re Nomination Papers of Nader, for example, registered voters in Pennsylvania filed suit in state court, seeking to have the names of independent candidate Nader and his running mate Peter Camejo excluded from the ballot. As in several other states, the objectors challenged the petition signatures submitted by the Nader-Camejo campaign. In addition, the Pennsylvania objectors argued that Nader and Camejo were not qualified to appear on the general election ballot by virtue of the state’s “sore loser” law, which prohibited candidates from running in a general election after running in state primaries. Although the Pennsylvania Supreme Court found that its statute did not in fact justify the exclusion of Nader and Camejo from the ballot, there was no doubt as to the state court’s ability to entertain a challenge to a presidential candidate’s qualifications in the course of determining whether to deny that candidate access to the state ballot.

    “It is conceivable that a comparable state-court lawsuit could be filed, in Pennsylvania or another swing state, to challenge a presidential candidate’s constitutional qualifications to serve. There is no requirement that a plaintiff in a state-court lawsuit meet the Article III or prudential requirements for standing. Further, the federal political question doctrine does not bar state-court litigation seeking to exclude a presidential candidate from the ballot on the ground that he or she is ineligible. It is also conceivable that a state-court case challenging a presidential candidate’s eligibility could be brought after an election. State law might allow a post-election contest of primary or general election results on the ground that the candidate who gained the most votes does not meet the qualifications for office. A losing presidential candidate could bring a contest petition in state court, seeking an order invalidating the election results if state law allows such a remedy.”

  30. 83 Ted November 6, 2010 at 6:56 pm

    Bottom line, only another candidate on the ballot would have standing AFTER the election; however, a state voter would have standing BEFORE the election.

    • 84 Troy November 6, 2010 at 7:38 pm

      Both scenarios were attempted and all efforts were dashed by the courts…They don’t care about any laws…They just make them up as they go.

      • 85 Troy November 6, 2010 at 7:51 pm

        When a presidential candidate, Alan Keyes, filed suit in the state of California, take a wild guess at what the court’s ruling was.

        The court ruled that Keyes had “no real chance” of winning the election and therefore his case was moot and because of that he suffered no real unique “injury” which meant that he didn’t have standing.

        What a load of crap they made up out of thin air…They do whatever they want.

        • 86 Debbie G November 6, 2010 at 8:25 pm

          Yah whatever..they said the demos would win this last election also….Hmmmm since when did they become fortune tellers or mind readers!

      • 87 heather November 6, 2010 at 8:13 pm

        Yes they do, Conyers said that himself on national TV last summer, “rules? what rules, we make them up as we go along!”

        So in essence these rules they are making are bogus and made against us and exempt for them–however our founding fathers thought way ahead and wrote the Constitution for this very reason—-just wish these criminals followed it and didn’t use it for their agendas.

  31. 88 Ted November 6, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    And (sorry for the long quote, but very very important), here is the great conclusion from the law review article:

    “Conclusion

    The current federal lawsuits challenging the presidential candidates’ eligibility to serve as president are not justiciable, and it is questionable whether any justiciable case could be brought in federal court as an initial matter. Fortunately, there are alternative means to adjudicate this matter that are consistent with the U.S. Constitution. The most promising is a pre-election state-court lawsuit seeking to keep an allegedly unqualified candidate off the ballot. In the event that a renegade state court rejects a candidate who is, in fact, eligible or that two or more state courts reach conflicting conclusions on a candidate’s eligibility, U.S. Supreme Court review should be available as a backstop. This avenue seems less fraught with peril than congressional resolution of the matter, given Congress’ dubious legal authority to not count electoral votes of a candidate it believes ineligible. Those who seek to challenge a presidential candidate’s eligibility would thus be well-advised to dust off their state election codes and head to state court.”

    • 89 drkate November 6, 2010 at 7:51 pm

      not justiciable? No, I can’t agree there at all. You must read the Mario Apuzzo site and get a handle on this. Congress cannot do this either.

    • 91 Jan November 6, 2010 at 7:44 pm

      Ted, I read on another blog this morning that the bill did not pass in AZ as there is already a law on AZ books that covers it. The blogger stated that Gov. Brewer knows this so why has she not brought it up?

      My assumption is that she is one of the 10-appointed governors for obat’s division of our country in to 10-parcels.

      Also, why didn’t Gov. Brewer just file a law suit in Superior Court for the government not protecting our borders?

      SMOKE SCREEN?????

      • 92 tfb November 6, 2010 at 8:02 pm

        I agree that Brewer is controlled opposition to protecting the border, just look she’s an offshoot of McCain and Napolitano, long line of open-border people. She’s playing both sides.

        Remember, Arizona did not enforce ARS 16-311, had it, Obama would not be POTUS. It’s still on the books, requiring PROOF of qualification for a candidate to get on the ballot.

        This is a critical point to address, preempt, with AZ Attorney General’s office which is NOT doing its job as required by citizens of Arizona. Perhaps we should blog this on some AZ sites?

  32. 94 no-nonsense-nancy November 6, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    Dr. Kate, that mind control video is very intriguing. So is the one embeded with it on TV programing and controling our thoughts. I’m very glad I don’t pay for TV any more.

  33. 95 ELmo November 6, 2010 at 8:18 pm

    Resignation (if the heat is on) is definitely what will happen.
    Biden will then “Pardon Obama” ala Gerald Ford / Nixon and Obama will skate free as a bird. Write it on the wall.
    ELmo

  34. 96 Ted November 6, 2010 at 8:54 pm

    Dr. Kates et al:–

    The point is that groups (voters) should now be mobilizing to file lawsuits against Secretaries of State in each and every state, prospectively before the next election challenging the ineligibility of Obama’s name to be on the ballot.

    AND IN FACT, SUITS SHOULD BE INITIATED MUCH EARLIER THAN THAT BASED UPON ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN SOLICITATION (by the current re-elect Obama 2012 campaign) FOR/BY SOMEONE INELIGIBLE TO BE ON THE BALLOT. That is, illegal/fraudulent campaign contribution solicitation. THAT can be done right now!

    The point is simply get a case to court, now, or as early as possible, and publicize, compelling a court to take a look at the natural born citizen eligibility issue. (You don’t need Gov Brewer, etc.)

    Dr. Kates, I’m not going to take issue with the validity of the federal cases, I wish they’d be successful — however, this is another avenue to get things going now!

  35. 101 Quantun Leap November 6, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    GIRD YOUR LIONS

  36. 102 Quantun Leap November 6, 2010 at 11:09 pm

    how to survive hyperinflation

  37. 103 Quantun Leap November 6, 2010 at 11:15 pm

    1 of 5

  38. 104 drkate November 6, 2010 at 11:34 pm

    Look who’s calling who a terrorist–LOL

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=224817

    From Commander Kerchner:

    “A perfect example of transference and projection of her own mindset and way of dealing with political issues in her mind, thinking and action onto others. She believes others will act violently because that is what she has done and what is her mindset. This is the classic example of accusing your political opponents of doing what they themselves are doing. Another example of this was accusing the Chamber of Commerce of using and funneling foreign money into U.S. political campaigns when it is was Obama and the Progressive candidates who do that all the time and are kings at doing it and hiding it. Classic transference and projection onto one’s opponents the thing they do. These Progressive Politicians do crooked things including foreign illegal money and voter registration fraud and are lying about what they themselves are doing so much that they believe everyone else is too.”

    • 105 drkate November 6, 2010 at 11:36 pm

      Are Dohrn and Ayers in India with barky?

      • 106 heather November 7, 2010 at 12:02 am

        Don’t know–my neighbors said it’s very quiet there, lots of grilock, people can’t get to where they need to go because of security.

        Since he took 3000 people I wouldn’t be a bit surprised who he took………maybe the monkeys and wild dogs will terrorize them …..lol

  39. 108 Quantum Leap November 7, 2010 at 12:24 am

    1 year ago…

  40. 109 Papoose November 7, 2010 at 7:59 am

    January 2013

    One sunny day in January, 2013, an old man approached the White House from across Pennsylvania Avenue , where he’d been sitting on a park bench. He spoke to the U.S. Marine standing guard and said, “I would like to go in and meet with President Obama.”

    The Marine looked at the man and said, “Sir, Mr. Obama is no longer president and no longer resides here.”

    The old man said, “Okay,” and walked away.

    The following day, the same man approached the White House and said to the same Marine, “I would like to go in and meet with President Obama.”

    The Marine again told the man, “Sir, as I said yesterday, Mr. Obama is no longer president and no longer resides here.”

    The man thanked him and, again, just walked away.

    The third day, the same man approached the White House and spoke to the very same U.S. Marine saying, “I would like to go in and meet with President Obama.”

    The Marine, understandably agitated at this point, looked at the man and said, “Sir, this is the third day in a row you have been here asking to speak to Mr. Obama. I’ve told you already that Mr. Obama is no longer the president and no longer resides here. Don’t you understand?”

    The old man looked at the Marine and said, “Oh, I understand. I just love hearing it.”

    The Marine snapped to attention, saluted, and said, “See you tomorrow, Sir.”

  41. 114 Quantum Leap November 7, 2010 at 10:56 am

    Don’t you for one minute think that keeping Pelouse is a nice political ploy. I can’t stress enough how imperative it is that she be rendered incapacitated. It is vital that she not be speaker or minority leader or any such thing. Heck, we want her out of congress all together.
    She is far left of obummer and is the reason we are in trouble. She has looted the country and hid money in foreign banks. All our money has been withdrawn and put in foreign SWISS banks since the day she took over as speaker. (Remember her trip to the swiss banks during the DNC convention?- she went to set up the accounts to funnel the treasury money because it’s backed by gold)

    Get rid of her. If it were not for her, obummer could never have stolen the primary. They are getting ready for part II of their agenda—> push to bankrupt the country and create a facist state. All is not well. Within this year the dollar is slated to collapse. Buy and stock up on your necessities now before prices go up and no one will be able to afford anything. (The price of $5.00/lb of beef chuck for stew NOW is an indicator)

    Pelouse is a cancer on this country and needs to go NOW! Boehner (he’s a boner alright :lol:)needs to be watched like a hawk. He’s a phoney and a Dem water bearer. He has been there toooo long.
    He pretends all this stuff like slamming the Health care bill down on the floor, but it is only planned theatrics to impress and fool the little people.

    The next order of business is to render the MSM more useless than we already have (since they did not run O’Donnells paid ads) and to watch that things don’t go back to business as usual.

    We need to take back the Tea Party. It’s a non partisan patriot group or at least it’s designed to be that. It’s supposed to be all inclusive. Repubs stole our Tea Party. It was comprised of disenfranchised Dems and the MSN meme was that it’s comprised of only Repubs so they could cover obummers embarrassment for stealing the election and disenfranchising the conservative Dems.

    Here’s what we do at next election…
    Make calls 24/7 the last 5 days before the election and pay them to do it. Paid volunteers. That is how to win. Watch the Dems do it this way. That’s how they squeaked by this time.
    But that’s a tall order. Conservatives are not willing to do what it takes to win elections. Fat and happy; they want to skate towards the finish line but it won’t happen without a fight.

    PELOUSE: YOU ARE FIRED.

    Now elect Tea Partiers. Repub and dem party is owned by the corporations and big banks. They are collectivists. We just changed seats on the titanic is all. Seems everyone is way too comfortable. Disenfranchised dems have seen this all before. Don’t get punked again. These career politicians know how to play the game and fool the little people. They are out for themselves. They robbed our piggy bank giving each other pork laden favors and huge cash money and don’t care about the people. They just want us all dead with the new health care rationing, chem-trails, tainted food, monsanto,virus shots and the like. They took the boomers money for SS and can’t pay it back so they want boomers to be gone. Rotten solutions eh?

    DOWN WITH A REPUB ONLY TEA PARTY. NON-PARTISAN PATRIOTS ONLY OR EAT YOUR SHORTS THE NEXT ELECTION. REPUBS CAN’T WIN BY THEMSELVES. THEY DO NOT KNOW HOW TO FIGHT.

    YES I AM MAD ABOUT TEA PARTY BEING STOLEN BUT SILENT NO MORE.

    Word on the street is the DHS is sending crates of emergency dried food to all states and cities and is trying to do it in a hurry.
    Wonder why? Dollar crash due to hyperinflation. $6.00/gal gas this winter? Will the Dollar stores go out of business? China goods will not be so cheap anymore. Why the f*k did they send all our manufacturing jobs to other countries? Since Carter, they have been slowly and steadily making us into a slave nation and strippig us of our American ingenuity.

  42. 115 Troy November 7, 2010 at 12:18 pm

    Why the f*k did they send all our manufacturing jobs to other countries? Since Carter, they have been slowly and steadily making us into a slave nation and strippig us of our American ingenuity.
    +++++++++++++++++++
    A New World Order: Global “share the wealth” / redistribution scheme….Global socialism governed by one ruling body.

    During the final implimentation you will constantly be hearing a new catch phrase being used by the MSM as well as Washington and international politicians.

    “The Dawn of a New Day”

    and

    “A New Day Dawning”

    Everywhere you look you will be hearing and seeing this…It will be accompanied by a new LOGO / SEAL…It will prominently display communist red and feature a rising sun.

    Do you remember how sick you got of hearing the catch phrase “Hope and Change” and the Obama logo?…This will be like that multiplied by ten fold.

    I have already, on several occasions, heard Obama and other high level DC elite politicians use this very phrase…I have also, more than once, heard TV pundits use the phrase…It is not a coincidence.

    They are going to seer it into people’s brains….You’ll become sick of seeing and hearing it.

    • 116 Papoose November 7, 2010 at 1:06 pm

      AND all clerical jobs? call centers abroad…

      green cards here should get bank jobs last in this Country.

      special want ads for green cards and a published data bank with stats across the Land as to industry positions having people hired on green cards…get in line!

  43. 117 Papoose November 7, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    I wish we could turn our attention to the Chicago crimes. There is so much there…soetero is in so thick and he stole so much money/ used his authority on non profit boards to steal and give it to his commie and received so many kickbacks.

    If only we could press on this and get as many people as possible to question and pound and pound and pound for the truth…we need to converse and set this thing ablaze.

    Rezko is scheduled for sentencing in January and blago is up again in April.

    we need to chip away at this crook:

    http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/star-us-attorneys-reputation-is-on-line-in-blagojevich-trial/19592806

    Why did he hold that mid-day no news press conference in December of 2008 when the eection was being certified.

    Why did he ignore the fact that barky and blago were in colusuin after the general election and in the very early days of December prior to the charade of “busting” blago.

    There is a CONFLICT of Interest here…

    I wish we could come full circle as Evelyn Pringle’s series in the Spring 2008 provided the goods and got the ball rolling with the Bloggers…

    Remember when RBO ——> was known as RW/ Rezko Watch?

    We need to watch again, intently. We need to get involved in this as it should be of National concern and not just a Chicago news story.

    busted, barky….and here we sit… that goon he’s married to and Valerie Jarret, his fairy godmother, are as guilty as sin.

    • 118 Lee M November 8, 2010 at 12:56 am

      When the FBI Directorship becomes open next year, and Obama appoints Fitzpatrick to the post, you will see why he acted so outlandishly in this prosecution. He was under advice to discredit Blago before Obama took over.

  44. 119 Papoose November 7, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    ^^^ used his authority sitting on non profit boards commie apparatus

    thugs scheming to infiltrate and fundamentally change America forever using taxpayer money to pay for the coup.

    if it was like that then…who is doing it now…. and what is there relationship to these creeps?

    who are the current board members doing the exact same thing and who is being paid off with our money?

    Chicago should be paved in gold by now with all the loot diverted to their own banks and bank accounts.

    Poverty should be non-existent in Chicago Illinois. Education should be state-of-the- art…

    Put barky under oath: discovery and deposition and testimony without a set of teleprompters…

    Michelle Obama needs to be put under oath, as well.

  45. 120 Troy November 7, 2010 at 2:43 pm

    Did y’all watch the You Tube video that I posted above?

    If not, then I highly recommend that you do.

    It starts off kind of slow, but don’t give up on it or else you’ll miss out….Watch all the way to the end!

    This is what we are all witnessing.

  46. 121 Stock November 7, 2010 at 2:48 pm

    Some thoughts, post election:
    First, encourage lawsuits to be initiated against Secs of State in all States (for Injuctive Relief) to keep Barky off the 2012 Ballot.
    Second, encourage Issa to initiate what should have been the second half of the “eligibility” investigation which was begun in Apr. 08 as to McCain by the Dems in the Senate, to now be completed in reciprocity as to Obama.
    There is going to have to be a constant campaign for the next two years. We will not be able to rest for many election cycles-if ever. Remember where we were just two years ago-in shock and getting letters from representatives and Senators with statements that: “he was duly elected” and “is a citizen” and with the stupidity of the letter I received from Senator Mel Martinez (12-1-08) in which he stated,”Presidential candidates are vetted by voters at least twice-first in the primary elections and again in the general elecction. And, he has now been duly elected by the majority of voters in the United States. The voters have made clear their view that Mr. Obama meets the qualifications to hold the office of President.”
    Never again trust these political monkeys to look after our interests or protect us-

  47. 123 Quantum Leap November 7, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    Silent John Kerry….ahem…obummer is carry out Kerry’s plan to the tee.

    • 124 drkate November 7, 2010 at 5:14 pm

      blech. but agreed, plan to a T. And no, he can’t bridge the gap. and no, there is no moderate islam.

    • 125 heather November 7, 2010 at 7:28 pm

      Bridge the divide–what divide–there wasn’t one until 2007 with these communists–and Kerry is a traitor–he needs to be sentenced for treason as well as the rest of them–the only way he got his money is through theresa……..user

  48. 126 Quantum Leap November 7, 2010 at 5:16 pm

    They all Lie!

  49. 127 Quantum Leap November 7, 2010 at 5:22 pm

    Headlines on the Sunday news says “Republicans at a loss of what to do next”
    Here…….——-> Let us disenfranchised Dems (now unaffiliated) school you on what’s next….
    But please..this time do not take the credit like you have with the Tea Party. If you bag the non-repub support AGAIN THEN YOU ARE TOAST in the form of tons of lost support. GUARANTEED.
    GOD SAVE AMERICA! God save the non-partisan Tea Party from repub theft.

  50. 128 Jan November 7, 2010 at 5:38 pm


    Every person in the U.S. needs to see these videos. Wish there was some way to force Congress/Senate to watch so they would know that we know and are not going to sit and watch this happen.

    From Joan Veon – this is a 9-video series on banking and the World Bank and who controls the U.S. and almost all other countries.
    Each video is around 10-minutes, be sure to watch all nine.

    We know in the depth of our souls that something bad is happening. We blame Bush, we blame obama, but these videos will put the blame where it belongs.

    Joan Veon passed away in October. You can Google her name and see many of the videos and lectures. She was a wealth of information.
    An investigative reporter. A Christian. God rest her soul. She has left us with more information than you can absorb all at one time, so take small bites. She knew what was happening to our country and was determined to let us know.

  51. 129 MeJane November 10, 2010 at 6:41 pm

    We must work on ways and means of neutralizing the possible legal precedent aspect that Obama’s usurpation allows before 2012 election brings another ineligible Candidate forward. In my mind the States must create an instrument by which the Constitutional natural born citizenship of a Presidential candidate is scrutinized and approved before their allowed on the ballot, like Arizona did. They would need to provide the long form birth certificates for themselves and their parents. If their parents were foreign born/naturalized citizens, they would need to show their parents naturalization papers as well. The newly elected Republican Governors would be a great place to start this ball rolling as well as our State legislatures. If our State legislators will not act to create this instrument, then, Governors (We just had a slew of Republican Anti Obamacare Governors elected into office happily) can create an “Executive order”, which states that their Secretary of State must supply documentation as proof of every Presidential candidates Constitutional eligibility and natural born citizenship or the Governor cannot not sign the Certificate of Ascertainment needed to get the candidate on the ballot. We should get going on this, time is a wasting.

    I may be wrong but I do believe that a legal precedent would only be allowed if we the people had “full knowledge” that BHO was ineligible, as in written literal legal proof of his ineligibility. We the American people would have needed to have had full knowledge of his ineligibility and had elected him anyway, thus agreeing to his usurpation through a relaxing of the Article II, NBC clause. Since BHO has refused to supply the American people with his L.F. birth certificate or any of his vetting documents and the lawsuits looking into the matter were not allowed to come to fruition, with the possible exception Appuzo’s case still pending, we never had full knowledge or have we had a right to discovery. Wouldn’t this stop a legal precedent dead in the water? Nothing has been legally decided upon to set a legal precedent on? Could this possibly be why the Supreme court does not want to touch this? Without a SC decision, Article II, NBC is still as intact as it ever was, just as it was after Arthur’s usurpation because the American people were lied to and deceived. You cannot amend the Constitution through deception or vague legal precedent. Not that this will stop the Progressives, or our political parties who’ll do anything when it comes to winning an election, who sadly have no need or respect for Constitutional law. We the people need to see that our State Representatives insure the eligibility of our Presidential candidates, let’s not continue to have the wolves in charge of the hen house.

  52. 130 deafy April 24, 2011 at 8:54 am

    One thing I truly dread, more than anything else …
    that the idiot Biden will issue a presidential pardon like one did for Nixon, and prevent us all from doing the complete clean up of this stinking mess.
    Besides this, what about the co-conspirators/traitors? I am talking about Pelosi and many others who obviously knew … are they going to be overlooked and walk away scot-free?

  53. 131 steve May 29, 2011 at 6:51 pm

    Mikhail Kryzhanovsky. KGB OPERATION “BARACK OBAMA”

    ===============================================

    Part 1. Bill Clinton.

    On December 31, 1969 Oxford student and anti-war activist Bill Clinton came to Moscow through Holland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland for 5-days vacation at expensive “National” Hotel. His autobiography says the only person he knew in Moscow was Anik “Nikki” Alexis, a daughter of a French diplomat who was now studying at the Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University. Clinton recalls, “One night I took a bus out to Lumumba University to have dinner with Nikki and some of her friends” On the bus back home, Clinton says, there was only one other passenger, Oleg Rakito, who “spoke better English than I did” and “asked me lots of questions and told me he worked for the government, virtually admitting he was assigned to keep an eye on me”.
    The story is all fake. First, foreigners who can afford “National” don’t use public transportation on January -30 C night. Second, KGB officer might reveal his identity to a foreigner only if he’s recruiting him. Third, Bill Clinton was recruited, otherwise he would have left Moscow immediately and in panic. Instead, he enjoyed the rest of his vacation and went to Chechoslovakia, another socialist country.
    Bill Clinton tried to move America towards socialism through health care reform plan. His effort ultimately died, though Obama finished the job successfully. Clinton helped Russians to save their secret source, CIA “mole” John Deutch.
    Deutch was born in Belgium to a Russian father and he was the only Russian CIA Director. He got some jobs with top secrets access : 1983 – President’s Commission on Strategic Forces, 1990-1993 – the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board member , 1993-1994 – Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, Deputy Defense Secretary, 1995-1996 Director of Central Intelligence Agency. Since 2000 – MIT Professor and Director for Citigroup.
    Deutch was appointed CIA Director by President Clinton and stayed in Langley in 1995- 1996. He is a Russian “mole,” and he’s safe because President Clinton obstructed the investigation and pardoned this enemy of state in 2001.
    John Deutch ordered my recruitment. In 1995 I, a former KGB intelligence officer and Ukrainian National Security illegal spy, came to USA where I hoped to work for the government as strategic intelligence analyst. I was recruited by CIA as “Filament” and had to work also for FBI National Security Division – it was CIA-FBI conspiracy.I had to spy on the U.S. Congress They wanted also to influence the White House and I wrote “The Professional” system special instructions for President Bill Clinton (now in use by Barack Obama). My “White House Special Handbook”, 2007 is based on “The Professional”.
    I state that political control over the White House and the U.S. Congress, not national security, was and is the CIA and FBI top priority. The also had “a very important job up to my high professional skills as a sniper”. I didn’t want to kill politicians. They’ve pressed me very hard in return. .Three months before 9/11 tragedy happened, in June 2001, I’ve warned American President George W. Bush and the U.S. Senate on CIA anti-American activity, national security collapse and my personal situation. My Senator Hillary Clinton refused to mess with CIA . In September 2002, White House sent a request to the Dept. of Justice, where FBI Director R. Mueller blocked it because I was a “joint” CIA-FBI project. Senator Chuck Schumer’s (D) Office explained to me that “American national security is not his business”.President Obama, Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security Secretary and Mark Kappelhof, Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division keep silence. In 2007, ALGORA, a small publishing company, released my “White House Special Handbook, or How to Rule the World in the 21st Century”, based on “The Professional”. 300 universities and colleges including Yale, Princeton, Harvard, Georgetown and Oxford, learn top political management in a right, KGB way .

    Three signs are enough to triangulate a “mole” and here they are for Mr. Deutch:

    1. Two days after Deutch retired from the CIA, on December 16, 1996, technical personnel discovered at his house highly classified information stored on his unclassified computer, loaded from his agency computer. He refused to explain why he violated strict security rules.
    First, Director of Central Intelligence doesn’t need highly classified data on his home computer, because he is a bureaucrat, not an analyst.
    Second, here we have a trick — the Internet-connected computer is accessible by anyone with some technical knowledge and you don’t have to send anything — the Russians will read secret information right from your home computer.
    2. In 1997 the CIA began a formal security investigation. It was determined that his computer was often connected to the Internet with no security, and that Deutch was known to leave memory cards with classified data lying in his car. Deutch used his influence to stop further any investigation and the CIA took no action until 1999, when it suspended his security clearances. He admitted finally the security breach and merely apologized.
    3. In 1999 the Defense Department started its own investigation, and it appeared that in 1993 Deutch, as Defense Undersecretary, used unsecured computers at home and his America Online (!) account to access classified defense information. As Deputy Defense Secretary, he declined departmental requests in 1994 to allow security systems to be installed in his residence.
    4. In 2000 Senator Charles Grassley asked the Justice Department to look into the case. There was no investigation.
    In 2001 President Clinton pardoned Deutch. There were no comments.

    ===================================

    Part 2. “Barack Obama”

    On November 4, 2008 “Barack Obama” won presidential election. He was born on August 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii.If there’s something very wrong with someone’s birth certificate and if there’s an indication that this someone used a birth certificate information of a newborn child (Virginia Sunahara) who died at birth or soon after birth, we have to talk about the methods Russian intelligence (SVR, a former KGB) and its illegal espionage department. We have to talk about one of the stages of the illegal spy “documentation process” – using “special” birth certificates to get legal documents in USA – SS#, driver license, passport.
    Hawaii law requires the registration of a death within 3 days and the registration of a birth within 7 days. With an Aug. 4, 1961, birthdate, Virginia Sunahara’s birth registration was filed as late as Aug. 11, 1961 – the same day the Nordyke twins’ birth certificates were filed by Kapi’olani hospital with the Hawaii Department of Health local registrar and registrar general. Susan Nordyke, the twin born first, received birth certificate number 10637; Gretchen Nordyke, the second, received number 10638. Barack Obama’s birth certificate was issued the number 10641, even though it was registered three days before the Nordykes’ certificates. However, if the birth certificate number 10641 was first assigned to Virginia Sunahara, the apparent conflict could be explained.

    Now, let’s reconstruct Obama’s biography as I see it with my 30 years of espionage experience.
    Illegal spy cover story works best if it’s a mix of actual and fake facts. “Obama” (let’s call him John Smith) was a child of a student from Kenya whop studied at the Peoples’ Friendship University in Moscow and who dated a Russian girl. Such kids in Russia were often unwanted by both partners and were raised and educated at a special school. Like Obama, John Smith was born in 1961 and like him graduated from high school in 1979. KGB paid attention to a very smart young man. Lieutenant Smith was Intelligence Institute student in 1979-1982 (it’s in Moscow, not far from “Cosmos” Hotel – there are couple of buildings in the area and I got intelligence education myself in one of them back in 1987).
    Then a decision was made to train him individually as illegal intelligence officer .The “dacha” (Russian for small villa) not far from Moscow, provides an ideally isolated territory for training. Two or three instructors also live there to immerse the candidate completely and supervise him all the time. The internal fittings of the dacha are prepared very thoroughly and carefully. From the first day the candidate becomes accustomed to the circumstances in which he will be living and working in USA for many years. He wears American clothes, eats the food, he’s thinking, acting and living like 100% American . From the first day of his training he is supplied with the majority of papers and magazines, he’s watching movies and TV shows. The instructors ask the candidate the most difficult questions imaginable with regard to what has been read and seen. After a number of years of such training, the future illegal knows everything about America, espionage technology and speaks perfect English.
    At the same time, in 1979-1981, Barack Obama studied at Occidental College in Los Angeles where he became a socialist ready to transform the nation by redistributing wealth. KGB station in Washington, DC which was constatntly looking for future secret sources at American universities and colleges, got information about young socialist. They sent his picture and some info to Moscow where strking resemblance was discovered between a college student from Los Angeles and a future illegal spy John Smith.
    In mid-1981, Obama travelled to Indonesia to visit his mother and sister Maya, and visited the families of college friends in India and Pakistan for 3 weeks. Then something happened in India, a good friend to Soviet Union and a perfect place to recruit foreigners. He was recruited and he disappeared – John Smith aka Barack Obama came back to the United States – change of agents, one of regular illegal espionage methods.
    In 1982 Obama’s father died in a car accident in Nairobi, his mother lived in Indonesia and might be just avoided or ignored by her “son” (Don Johnson, Dunham co-worker said “Obama was distancing himself from her”. Russians approached Ann Dunham under a “false flag” ( National Security Agency or CIA) and explained that her son had to stay abroad for a secret mission for some time. They told her that she had to be ready to accept another person as her own son. For operation like that, espionage agencies often recruit close relatives and allow them to meet their son(daughter) from time to time outside USA. Money talks, there’s nothing unusual, though for Dunham the pressure and depression was too big – she died in 1995 of cancer at 52.
    Time changes people, so “Obama” had to stay away from his friends and do not show up in public too much. In 1981 he transferred to Columbia University in New York City, where he majored in political science and where nobody could remember him, and graduated with a B.A. in 1983. In 1983-1985 he worked at the Business International Corporation and at the New York Public Interest Research Group. “Obama” had to function like a regular illegal spy, living a quite life , staying away from his mother and old friends, recruiting secret sources and sending information to Moscow. He worked in Chicago as community organizer in 1985-1988 and in mid-1988 travelled to Europe to meet his KGB handlers and get new instructions. He had a choice – a safe variant (to make a political career in one of African countries), and a risky one of staying in America – KGB wanted him to be Martin Luther King #2 or one of African leaders. But it appeared he get much more which is Oval Office. It was decided he could stay in USA longer and it was a success : Illinois state senator (1997-2004) and U.S. Senator (2005-2008).
    . In 2005 he visited Russia together with Senator R.Lugar and met his SVR handlers to discuss his prospectives for the U.S. presidency.
    In 2007, Obama announced his candidacy for President of the United States. In 2008 he won the race and became the first Russian illegal spy to be elected the U.S. President.The Congressional Research Service, a public policy arm of Congress, officially admits no one in the government ever vetted Obama’s constitutional eligibility.
    After his victory in November 2008. American President “Barack Obama”, the most powerful man in the world, lost sense of reality and ignored his Russian intelligence boss (Mikhail Fradkov) instructions – he had his own vision on how to rule and destroy America .Russians were not going to lose control over the White House and American President. They explained to Obama, that it’s OK, but he had to work together with Bill Clinton, a “big friend of Russia” and his people.. Bill Clinton was instructed what to do and in November 2008 Obama had to divide the power – he appointed Hillary Clinton the Secretary of State, Rahm Emanuel ( Clinton’s chief political adviser) – the White House Chief of Staff and Leon Panetta (Clinton’s Chief of Staff) – CIA Director. On October 2, 2010 he managed to fire Rahm Emanuel (I’ll tell you why) and after that Russians humiliated him one more time – in April 28, 2011, he was forced to nominate Panetta to replace Robert Gates as Secretary of Defense. If confirmed (in July , 2011), Panetta would end all operations and withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq – that’s another Russian intelligence order. Obama, actually, lost half of his power by giving two key Cabinet positions to Clintons team – that’s how Russians punished their illegal spy for his independence.
    Still, as a Russian illegal intelligence officer he’s good. He’s destroying America – its called “socialist intervention into the US economy”. Besides, while Bill Clinton saved one Russian “mole” John Deutch, Obama saved 10 (ten) Russian illegal spies sending them back to Russia in 2010 without any investigation – severe blow to American national security and priceless gift to SVR, Russian intelligence.
    In April, 2011 he announced his intention to seek re-election in 2012. Coming collapse of America is the KGB/SVR payback for what happened to the Soviet Union which disappeared from the globe.

    ==========================================

    Part 3. Hillary Clinton

    2012 is coming and there’s a player who’ll never give up and whom Russian intelligence service can’t stop. Hillary Clinton with a team of her own.
    In March , 2010 I’ve received an invitation for a dinner with President Barack Obama and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi from DCCC (Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee) signed by Ian Sugar, Director of Development. Sugar explained that I pay $15,999 (credit card) and on May 13, 2010, at 6.00 PM I can come to St. Regis hotel, New York . Now, guess who was the DCCC Chairman in 2005-2009 and who could advise Ian Sugar to send Kryzhanovsky, a former KGB sniper, an invitation to a dinner with Obama ? Rahm Emanuel. I didn’t go, instead I’ve put on YouTube my video to show vulnerability of Obama’s protection system.
    On October, 12 2010, I had a meeting with two Secret Service agents, John and Bratt (646-842-2107) – they were very nervous about the video We had a long discussion. I’ve asked them why they allow the White House press office to put Obama’s next day schedule on Internet with exact time and place of his trips – it gives a perfect possibility to kill him. They told me it was Rahm Emanuel’s order and they can do nothing though on October 2, 2010 Obama fired Emanuel and it was a small victory over Clintons. More interesting – they told me they wanted me to work for them too :” We know you as “Filament”, you work for CIA and we want you to work for us too under the same alias. We’ll pay you”. So, I’m still acting CIA agent and they’re still sure I’ll do political murders ? And who’s the target – Obama ? That’s why Secret service is nervous – they are in the game ?
    That’s not the end. On January, 20 2011 I talked to FBI agent Eric Perry. He said my video made “high authorities, people on the very top vextremely nervous”. He didn’t explain if it was FBI Director Robert Mueller, the White House Chief of Staff or Obama himself. He asked me to delete the video from YouTube. Why FBI is so nervous, they are in the game ?
    Like with JFK assassination, you don’t need huge conspiracy – it’s enough if CIA Director, FBI Director and Secret Service Director make a deal. Back in 1963 they made a deal not to touch Lee Oswald untill he finished the job – simple, right , Mrs Hillary Clinton ?

    ============================================

    Part 4. What’s next ?

    “Birth certificate” story made Obama very angry, but actually he’s in panic. Russians are in panic too – it was a 100% surprise for them. They didn’t initially that Obama might get the Oval Office and his enemies would put his fake biography and documents under microscope. Russians could ask Donald Trump to stop his own investigation (Trump met Russian leader Putin and stated that America needs a president like him), but he will run for president in 2012 and he has to press Obama (Trump says “no”, but polls say “yes”).
    Now “Obama” has to make a choice together with his Russian boss Mikhail Fradkov, SVR Director:
    1) resign or just disappear and go back to Russia
    2) commit suicide or wait until Hillary Clinton’s clan kills him with my help, though I can tell Robert Mueller, Leon Panetta and Mark Sullivan one more time – I’m not coming back, I will not kill “Barack Obama” or anybody else, stop calling me and sending agents to get me back
    3) continue his re-election campaign and presidential activity no matter what
    4) fight Hillary Clinton’s mafia, cut off any attempts to investigate his biography

    There’s also “one-way ticket” possibility, if Russian intelligence makes a decision to “neutralize” “Obama” (staged car accident, etc) to avoid huge international scandal.

    ==========================================

    Mikhail Kryzhanovsky
    .
    30 years of international espionage experience
    KGB Counterintelligence School
    KGB Intelligence Institute
    a former KGB intelligence officer
    a former KGB “Nabat” anti-terror group sniper
    a former SBU (Ukrainian Security Service) illegal intelligence officer
    a former CIA/FBI “Filament”
    the author of the White House Special Handbook, Algora,2007
    the author of the US National Security System, 2011
    unemployed, homeless

    prof7prof@yahoo.com

    “Barack Obama 2012 : KGB technology 2008″ YouTube Video

    “Mikhail Kryzhanovsky” YouTube Video


  1. 1 Removing Obama « drkatesview | Trackback on November 5, 2010 at 11:22 pm
  2. 2 Tweets that mention Removing Obama « drkatesview -- Topsy.com Trackback on November 6, 2010 at 12:31 am
  3. 3 MUST READ…WE MUST KEEP THE PRESSURE ON SCOTUS AND CONGRESS… | NwoDaily.com Trackback on November 6, 2010 at 10:22 am
Comments are currently closed.



November 2010
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Recent Comments

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,670,310 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 607 other followers

%d bloggers like this: