…and if it is, who was responsible for the usurpation of the Office of the President of the United States in 2008? And what is/are the framework or frameworks that enable immediate remedy?
In the post Acts of War a brief review of the many “acts of war” against the U.S. from within was presented, such as the 1913 federal reserve act and fraudulent ‘ratification’ of the Sixteenth Amendment by SOS Philander Knox, Woodrow Wilson and the rise of the ‘progressives’-turned-socialists-turned democrats, and the FDR, Truman & Eisenhower rise of the military-industrial complex with the CIA. All of these over the last 100 years contributed to the placement of Barack Obama, a constitutionally ineligible phony, into the highest office in the land.
Enabled Covered by the blind and uninformed support of millions–itself enabled by controlled media–an ‘advancement in race relations’–was cheapened by Obama and used instead to destroy them.
The placement of a usurper into the office of the Presidency of the United States is the most blatant act of war against America since the Federal Reserve Act and Sixteenth Amendments of 1913 and the establishment of the military-industrial-government (i.e. CIA) complex in the 1950′s.
Our framework for analysis and action on the breach of Article II has taken many forms, including executing all legal actions possible–focusing on forgery, definition of natural born citizen, violation of liberty interests, fraudulent social security and selective service, and election fraud. In addition we continue to exercise our unalienable rights to life and liberty and our First, Seventh, and Tenth Amendment rights, we have petitioned, held grand juries and submitted charges of treason, and proposed and passed legislation. There have been successes and drawbacks in each forum but we are quick on our feet. The greatest advantage is that we have exposed the workings, form, history, components, and agents of this network and how Obama was placed into the White House. We know how this regime is aided by cooperation of the judiciary and members of congress which turns a blind eye to the truth.
By everything we have seen and what we know, the usurpation of the presidency is an ‘act of war’ against the United States, which is classified as ‘domestic terrorism‘:
TITLE 18; PART I; CHAPTER 113B ; § 2331 defines “domestic terrorism” to mean activities that–(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;(B) appear to be intended—
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
By installing a usurper, the perpetrators essentially affected the conduct of government inside the United States with the intent of coercing a civilian population, controlling the policy of government by intimidation or coercion, and by intentionally manipulating a presidential election to ensure the unconstitutional occupancy of the presidency. Obama’s DHS is used to
coerce terrorize, not protect Americans.
Within this context, Obama’s lack of constitutionality is no longer a law enforcement matter, it has crossed the line into the arena of the United States military. The Officer’s Oath of Office mandates action:
“I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.”
There are those officers that have lived this oath by challenging the unconstitutional Obama. We know the names Lakin, Kerchner, Barnett, Moran, Turner, Fitzpatrick, MacInerny, Vallely, and others. But far too many, including the Joint Chiefs, have done nothing when it would appear that they would be obligated to act because the threat to national security is so great, and the usurpation, according to the definition above, is domestic terrorism.
The scope and depth of the threat to this Nation and the essential corruption of the government cannot be shouldered or called for by the people alone. National defense is the first priority of the government as stated in the Constitution–to provide for the common defense.
The time is now. We the people are calling and will support you. Give us a sign.
Have we done everything we can do to alert our military to our readiness?