Article 1 Section 8, clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution is known as the Commerce Clause and is the subject of this article with respect to the upcoming Obamacare ruling and possible false flags Obama could threaten this year and most certainly in the first year of his second term. The Commerce Clause:
gives Congress the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.”
It restricts the power of Congress to regulate commerce among the states, not within the states.
Nearly all of the New Deal involved regulation of commerce that was not only interstate commerce but also commerce within a state or even was not commerce at all. None of these regulations would survive as constitutional or could be implemented under the Supreme Court’s then-prevailing constitutional precedents. .~conservapedia
Obama and the democrats not-so veiled public threats against the Supreme Court should it rule against the new-deal style Obamacare in either a limited or comprehensive way certainly are reminiscent of the New Deal Era when this false flag was enacted to ensure the Supreme Court ruled on New Deal legislation:
Knowing that he could not implement his agenda without a change in the Supreme Court, on March, 1937, President Roosevelt…publicly threatened to expand the number of Justices on the Supreme Court from 9 to 15, and appoint 6 new Justices friendly to Roosevelt’s agenda, since the Constitution does not specify the number of Justices that must comprise the Court.
The false flag was successful and the SCOTUS began to rule in a string of cases that the Commerce Clause allows Congress to regulate all aspects of life in the U.S., with the high point of the trend in the Wickard v Fiburn case.
The progressive left government is using this precedent and government apparatus (read DHS, EPA, CIA, FBI…etc ) to do just that–to control every aspect of your life, your garden, the food you grow for yourself, what you eat, and now obamacare–which cannot even be defined as health care. At its core Obamacare purports to derive its authority from the commerce clause.
But Obamacare creates interstate commerce where it does not exist, regulates in-state health care, and imposes new taxation to subsidize its interstate infrastructure. So the additional regulations create an additional strain on government resources, causing them to fail, which is at the heart of the Cloward-Piven strategy to bring about the fall of capitalism in America.
One aspect of the challenge against Obamacare is Congress’ the abuse of the commerce clause. Apparently a recent book by Justice Scalia entitled “Beyond all Reason” hints that a much broader blow to Obamacare might be in the works than just voiding the mandate–it goes directly at the abuse of the Commerce Clause:
Justice Scalia writes, for instance, that he has little use for a central precedent the Obama administration has cited to justify the health care law under the Constitution’s commerce clause, Wickard v. Filburn.
In that 1942 decision, Justice Scalia writes, the Supreme Court “expanded the Commerce Clause beyond all reason” by ruling that “a farmer’s cultivation of wheat for his own consumption affected interstate commerce and thus could be regulated under the Commerce Clause.”…
Note that it was the farmer’s self-sufficiency that
would deprive the corporations of income and could possibly reduces tax revenue from negatively impact interstate commerce, so it had to be fixed to generate revenue for government be regulated.
Obamacare takes over the healthcare business under the commerce clause and claims that the ‘general welfare’ clause of the Constitution gives them the authority to provide healthcare to everyone at taxpayer’s expense. In New Deal terms, Obamacare is the next social promise, still linked to a larger program fundamentally undermining the constitutional republic and the wealth of the nation.
Will Obamacare Complete the Cloward-Piven Process?
As discussed in the novel Admit the Horse, the long term view on Obama with regard to the current economic meltdown is that he was in on it from the beginning…with Holder via motor-voter laws, and with ACORN in the mortgage meltdown brought about by risky loans made to assuage the charges of racism. These are the politically correct loans that brought America to the brink… and Obama, even given a short leash, will do as much as he can to push us over the edge. Like Obamacare.
Reviewing the chaos created specifically by Obama, the economic meltdown coupled by Obamacare is not coincidental. It is clearly a part of the broader strategy to help collapse America…economically, morally, and spiritually.
Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition 2 Th. 2:3 KJV
America needs to repent of its great falling away from God through many SCOTUS decisions and acts of Congress and the Executive if we have any prayer of mercy in this struggle.
Stacking the Eligibility Courts
A virtual stacking of the courts has already occurred regarding judges and the SCOTUS in any constitutional case regarding Obama’s lack of eligibility. The judiciary is hopelessly conflicted as they all vie for a seat on the high court and obviously misuse the judicial machinery to dismiss cases and deny any hearing on the merits. Their paycheck relies on the current administration.
In the case of SCOTUS, well the Chief Justice knowingly swore in the guy and are accessories to treason if not treason themselves. And what about Kagan who refuses to recuse herself in eligibility cases or Obamacare, where she has an obvious conflict of interest? And what does it say about the other justices who don’t insist on discipline in or the integrity of the Supreme Court?
Punishing SCOTUS and America
America’s rejection of Obama and the NWO agenda has ticked them off and Obama, being the spoiled foreign kid brat, customarily lashes out in some new regulation, Executive Order, public insult, lavish vacation, or take-down of a public figure. Obama/Jarrett will show their true face as they retaliate for any rejection of ‘their’ work. Stack the courts? Request the resignation of certain justices? Executive Orders? What other false flags do they have up their sleeve?