Null and Void

©2012 drkate

Wait a minute. { Shakes head.}

Everyone keeps playing the game of “fighting” Barack Obama’s “laws” when by law, nothing that the illegal Barack Obama signs is legal.   It is void, can’t be enforced, inapplicable. 

He cannot meet the test of natural born citizen, can’t prove he was born in Hawaii, and gets by with a stolen social security number and forged selective service registration.  And everyone knows it.  Proving again that they are complicit in the fraud committed on the American people of installing Barack Obama.

But they are all compromised like John Roberts and many more could be criminally indicted. So they will make the choice to betray their country to save themselves.

The failure to hear and properly address Obama’s lack of Article II eligibility results in the violation of  our civil rights  under Title II,  Section 1983  with the highest court in the land now a clear and present danger instead of a clarifying voice and protector of the Constitution’s separation of powers.  As it turns out, every single member of the judiciary is compromised as their jobs depend on the current regime being in place; that fact in itself is a violation of our civil rights.

As Ann Barnhardt said, the proper response is “junta” but that is not likely.

Short of the arrests that should happen by responsible military, FBI, or law enforcement, or the revolution itself beginning prematurely,  let’s propose a different scenario.

In walk the plaintiffs as themselves and file a Title 42 action against the latest federal judge to dismiss an eligibility case:

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

Invoking Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiffs demand a jury trial:

(a) Right Preserved. The right of trial by jury as declared by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution—or as provided by a federal statute—is preserved to the parties inviolate.

The evidence is finally heard by a jury of regular citizens who conclude the judiciary has conspired with the Obama administration to repel lawful citizen petitions, resulting in a violation of the civil rights of these plaintiffs and all Americans.

Assuming it is framed properly, what is the remedy requested by this hypothetical legal action? How is it enforced?