Archive for the 'Arizona' Category

Constitutional Heroes to Gather in Phoenix

©2012 drkate

The Greater Phoenix Tea Party Patriots will be hosting a gathering in Phoenix on September 22 with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, former Lt. Col. Dr. Terry Lakin, and singer/songwriter/Patriot Pat Boone.  Other speakers include Investigator Mike Zullo, filmaker Bettina Viviano, and author Tom Ballantyne.

The event will be held at the Celebrity Theater and tickets may be purchased directly from the Theater.  The event will be held from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

View the event at the Terry Lakin Action Fund, and please click here to download a printable flyer to pass around.

This post asks for your help in fundraising for this event by purchasing tickets whether or not you are able to come.  Several Tea Party Patriots have purchased tickets for the Arizona Congressional Delegation, including Senators John McCain and Kyle, as well as candidates running for office.  Many of you have heard these politicians’ less than honest answers regarding Obama’s constitutional eligibility, and well, McCain threw the election to Obama anyway.  But your Senators and Representatives should be aware of this event!

SUPPORT SHERIFF JOE AND HIS CALL FOR CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION OF FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS

By the way, Terry Lakin’s book “Officer’s Oath” is an extremely interesting personal story of the sacrifices made in defense of our Constitution by Dr. Terry Lakin.  It is a must read for every Patriot who wants to know how a real military Officer behaves.

 

Open Thread!

Arizona v. U.S.– Caption Contest

©2012 drkate

Read the SCOTUS decision in Arizona v. United States here.

Today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is a victory for the rule of law. It is also a victory for the 10th Amendment and all Americans who believe in the inherent right and responsibility of states to defend their citizens. After more than two years of legal challenges, the heart of SB 1070 can now be implemented in accordance with the U.S. Constitution.” ~ Arizona Governor Jan Brewer

Look at those red ears of  THE #1 illegal immigrant in the U.S.!  Will somebody please tell the Secret Service to speed when they are in Arizona, especially when in Maricopa County???  Multiple-occupant identity check, please.  :razz:

Caption Contest and Open Thread! :smile:

HAWAII VERIFIES OBAMA NOT QUALIFIED FOR PRESIDENCY: DUAL CITIZEN, FOREIGN FATHER

©2012 drkate

Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured … but not prove they are a citizen.”

***********

Hawaii verified two things that are fatal to Obama’s qualifications for the presidency: first, he has a foreign father who was never an American; second, Obama is a dual citizen.

Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s Milquetoast email request for Hawaii to confirm the ‘information on Obama’s birth in Hawaii, and to accept an email response, got him what he, the republicans, and Obama wanted: another false ‘official’ statement from Hawaii’s Department of Heath (HDOH) supposedly validating Obama’s birth in Hawaii.  Ah, more ‘stuff’ that they can hide behind, claiming ‘due diligence’ has been done.

Hoping to put an end to the story,those pesky ballot challenges and Sheriffs, Hawaii and the AZ SoS perpetuate the myth and meme of ‘born in the USA”, or “American citizen”–as the only qualifying factor for President– to deceive the voting public.  The Hawaii release did not authenticate Obama’s 2011 electronic version of the Birth Certificate, leaving Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation in tact and relevant.  Hawaii also did not verify anything about Obama’s adoption.

We told you.

What no one expected was to have Barack Obama’s dual citizenship confirmed, again, by listing the name and birthplace of the father Barack Obama Senior and Kenya, East Africa (lots of name changes there since the 2008 short form).  Barack Obama junior was born a dual citizen of Britain and the United States.  The failure for Mr. Obama is that once born a British citizen, one cannot lose that citizenship unless it is specifically renounced.  His Kenyan citizenship may have expired unless he claimed it in 1983-but not his original British bonafides.

Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution requires the president to be either in either one of two citizenship categories:

  1.  a ‘natural born citizen’, or
  2.  a ‘citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution’:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Solid Constitutional, legal, and historic information support the definition of natural born citizen that must be used until the United States Supreme Court says differently.  A natural born citizen is born in the United States of parents who are American citizens.  Not a single parent; not the mother or the father, but both parents.

Obama has a foreign father thus fails the two-citizen parent test.

The consistent mistakes made by all deniers of Article II include citing erroneous case law, the 14th Amendment, or stating Article II reads that ‘citizens’ are allowed to be President, ignoring the necessary phrase ‘at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution’ in context. Other mistakes are made in looking to English Common Law’s definitions of and rules for acquiring ‘citizenship’.  A British citizen-subject is not an American natural born citizen.

But even if these common mistakes that Obama supporters and attorneys make are allowed to stand in court, no one can say that Article II permits a dual citizen to be the president

You have to be ‘natural born’ or, a ‘citizen at the time of the adoption of this Constitution’.  The Constitution does not add that category dual citizen as eligible for the Presidency. Nothing in any further legislation or amendment makes the Presidency open to being filled by a ‘naturalized’ American citizen.

The bottom line is that even if you think there is ambiguity in the definition of ‘natural born citizen’, there is NO AMBIGUITY that a dual citizen cannot be president or vice president of the United States.

Bennett’s Mistake is an Opening

Bennett makes his first mistake by asking only if Obama was born in Hawaii.  In doing so, Bennett actually takes it upon himself to define natural born citizen as ‘born in the USA” in contrast to 200 years of Constitutional law and Supreme Court case law in the United States. Furthermore, by ignoring the citizenship of Barack Obama’s father and Obama’s resulting dual citizenship, Bennett is unlawfully expanding the definition of natural born citizen to include dual citizens. As the State’s top election official, he has no authority to change the definition of natural born citizen nor to expand the classes of citizens qualified to hold the office.

After informing Secretary Bennett of Mr. Obama’s statement admitting the British Nationality Act governs his citizenship, the next series of questions for Secretary Bennett could include:

  • Does the Constitution permit a dual citizen to hold the office of President?
  • Does the Constitution permit a ‘naturalized’ citizen to hold the office of President?
  • Has Barack Obama renounced his dual citizenship with Britain?
  • Does Barack Obama’s known adoption by an Indonesian affect his existing dual citizenship?
  • Has Barack Obama naturalized as an American citizen?

These are questions Secretary Bennett should forward to the Attorney General.  An honest investigation will find that unless the Constitution is formally amended or the Supreme Court rules on these questions, Mr. Obama cannot qualify for Arizona’s ballot.

(update) This information, coupled with his publicist’s printing of  his biography raises significant doubt as to the legal validity or wisdom of placing Barack Obama on the ballot.  After all is said and done, this is misprision of felony!

Let this be the due diligence Arizonan’s require and their public servants provide. Let this effort lock him out of our White House forever!

Information Special Update by Jerome Corsi

Start at 2 hours, 15 minutes till end  for news on the Obama investigation, and much more, from Jerome Corsi (h/t j2j2):

 

Amendment 12 and January 9, 2013: The Last Line of Defense

©2012 drkate

Collectively, these actions, questions, investigations and research militate for and require the representatives and senators in each state where these actions have been undertaken to raise objections to the electoral college vote count on January 9, 2013.

This post will look far off into the future, and assumes for the moment that none of the legal and proper efforts Constitutionalists have undertaken since 2008 to have Barrack Obama Soetoro investigated and removed from office based on his lack of constitutional eligibility will have worked. We have created letter-writing campaigns, demonstrations, multiple lawsuits, ballot challenges, treason charges and trials, and citizen grand jury investigations.  History will record the efforts of American patriots to fight this injustice done to our country, and the world already knows of our efforts and knows that Obama is a usurper.  Obama has used tax dollars, drugs, weapons, or CIA threats to bribe Kenya, Indonesia, Pakistan, the muslim community, individual states, and so many others to keep silent about his illegality.  He is a legend–in name only–and history and God will judge all of those complicit as traitorous individuals not worthy of the spit on a street corner.

While we have been able to fully expose Obama/Soetoro and the network of criminals inside and outside of government who have enabled this usurpation, our efforts to have action taken on behalf of our Country and American citizens have been thwarted by the media, the judiciary, the Congress, law enforcement, the military, and the legion of insaneobots paid to harass Americans.  Assuming Obama and the democrats/republicans, in concert with the media will rig the 2012 presidential election and put Obama in the office again,  our last line of defense will be the counting and certification of the electoral college votes by a joint session of Congress on January 9, 2013.

Amendment 12:  Choosing the President

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;

The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.

The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

Appointment of the Electors.  States appoint the electors and the number of electors is based on the number of house and Senate seats in each state.  48 States and the District of Columbia “appoint” their Electors on a winner-take-all basis (that is, the presidential/vice-presidential ticket with the plurality of the Statewide vote [= most votes from the State] is intended to get all that jurisdiction’s Electors). In each of the two remaining States, Maine and Nebraska, the presidential/vice-presidential ticket that receives the plurality of the vote in each Congressional District is intended to get the vote of the 1 “district” Elector from that CD, while the presidential/vice-presidential ticket receiving the most votes Statewide is intended to get the votes of 2 “at-large” Electors from the State. The candidate that wins the popular vote in the other 48 states receives all of that state’s electoral college votesThis site describes the number of electoral votes in each state.

In most states, electoral college members are required to vote for the person who won the popular vote in the state, and in some cases there are financial and other penalties involved if one doesn’t follow that rule.  In 2008 there were attempts to file lawsuits at that point in time to prevent the vote for Obama, but the courts ruled that ‘the process had to be completed’ before any lawsuit on the merits could be filed (cough, cough).

Challenging the Vote in the Joint Session of Congress

The next point in time that we have to challenge the vote for Obama is on January 9, 2013, during a joint session of Congress to count the electoral college votes as specified in the Twelveth Amendment.

A few times in history this electoral vote counting was challenged by members of the House and Senate.  In 2000, while then VP Gore was presiding over the joint session of Congress, the vote was challenged by democrats, the black congressional caucus, and a few Senators based on the Florida recount debacle, where the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bush by taking away the State’s presumed jurisdiction over the vote count.  The objection was based on a possible fraudulent vote count.

In 2008, there were several reasons why the vote could have been challenged, including:

  • Obama’s lack of constitutional eligibility
  • The Democrat’s Rules and Bylaws theft of votes from HRC
  • Voter intimidation and caucus fraud
  • Illegal foreign campaign contributions
  • The insufficiency of Obama’s ballot access (forged signatures, for which Indiana democrats have recently been punished)
  • Voter machine tampering
  • Shutting down the Democrat’s convention without fully voting
  • Suspicious deaths of key HRC supporters

Former Speaker of the House of Lies

But no one challenged the electoral college vote, in fact I heard Nancy Pelosi was so drunk with power that she rushed the vote improperly, aided and abetted by VP Dick Cheney, without the requisite analysis of citizenship status or calling for objections.  All those who could have challenged this vote were too afraid to do so, and yes that includes Ron Paul.  They made a calculation that their paychecks and perks were more important than defending the Constitution from all enemies, domestic and foreign.

Every member of Congress, and every Senator on January 8, 2009, violated their oath of office and failed to protect America.  They will be held accountable in this lifetime, or clearly when they stand before their maker and try to explain away their treason.

The 2013 Scenario

As of this date, there have been millions of letters written to Congress, no less than 100 lawsuits that have never been heard on the merits, a dozen ballot challenges, a law enforcement investigation, citizen petitions to investigate, proven fraudulent ballot access in 2008 by Obama, proven voter intimidation, and public opinion polls that continue to demonstrate that most Americans do not believe Obama and want his status investigated.

Collectively, these actions, questions, investigations and research militate for and require the representatives and senators in each state where these actions have been undertaken to raise objections to the electoral college vote count on January 9, 2013.

The scoundrels known as our Senators and Congressmen, including the so-called ‘tea party favorites’, have one last chance to meet their oath of office, and of course, they want ‘cover’ for doing the right thing.  So here is, and hear, your cover, boys and girls:
  • Each state in which there has been a ballot challenge, petition, grand jury investigation, lawsuit, and letter writing campaign regarding Obama’s lack of eligibility needs to assemble a packet for each of their Congressmen and Senators requiring that they raise an objection to the electoral college count on January 9, 2013.  This effort must begin now, and make it clear that they will either be recalled, boycotted, or publically shamed if they fail to do so.  For new ‘tea party’ or other candidates (like John Dennis in California, trying to defeat Pelosi), pledges that they will raise an objection–regardless of the effect on their political career–must be secured, and if not, do not support them financially.  They only need to listen to their constituents to have enough ‘cover‘ reason to do so–it is the right thing to do.  We are talking New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Arizona, California, Florida, North Carolina, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Georgia, New York…to name a few.
  • Any state that can demonstrate voter fraud in 2012, including the caucuses, should require its congressional delegation to challenge the electoral college vote for their state
  • The State legislatures should be petitioned to send a directive to their congressional delegate to challenge the vote, based on the request of the public
  • A scientifically-sound poll should be commissioned in each state asking the direct question to the public whether they would support a challenge to the electoral college vote in 2013 if Obama is ‘re-elected’ to office.
  • Plans should be made to shut the Congress down in January–preventing their leaving their offices–until this issue is addressed.  Similar plans should be made for each congressional and senatorial office in each state.
  • A national strike should be considered in lieu of the Congress taking any action.

Remember that the Twelveth Amendment provides a legal, constitutional procedure to select the President and Vice President should the presidential candidate fail to meet the qualifications of the office.

Lock him out, lock him up

What don’t they want us to see?

©2012 drkate

The race card is a distraction.  And it looks like they’ve succeeded, again.

Cruising the internet in the last few days there are hundreds of articles on Trayvon Martin case, interracial violence, the history of racial relations in the United States,and the general level of violence existing in America.  This blog also took the time to discuss black-on-black violence.

If there was one article that knocked me back out of this focus on race, it was American Thinker’s article on Obama and the End of the Progressive Era, spurring conversations with friends reminding me of the distractions the left always provides to hide their true agenda.  While everyone is talking about the race card failing, and it being worn out, it actually has successfully diverted our attention again.

So what don’t they want us to focus on?

  • Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation of the illegality of Obama…the first law enforcement investigation to prove what we’ve known for a long time–that everything about Obama is fake.  The Arizona legislature is still holding up the eligibility bill, and our attention has been taken away from existing Arizona law (A.R.S. 16 311(B)) which requires Obama to submit a notarized form swearing he meets the qualifications of the office for which he is running…to wit, on December 13, 2007, Obama signed a form which falsely swore he was a natural born citizen.  Governor Jan Brewer was then the AZ Secretary of State.  The citizen petition that will bypass Governor Brewer has been signed by more than 1,000 people, and is headed to the Secretary of State and the AG, but the AG is now under criminal investigation.
  • Related to Obama’s lack of eligibility, several Indiana democrats were charged with voter fraud that occurred in 2008, where they forged hundreds of signatures to get Obama on the ballot.  Yes, the forging was ‘equal’ in that they did this for Clinton and Edwards, but you know who the real forging was for–Obama.  Just like the passport case.
  • Again related to Obama’s lack of constitutional eligibility, the document proving he was born in Kenya and came to the United States as an infant in August 1961 was uncovered in the Boston Public Library by the Daily Pen.
  • The ‘FED’ bought 61% of the U.S. Debt, in otherwords, WE bought the debt created by the politicians.  This is Bernacke’s  ‘quantitative easing installment no 3′ (QE 3).  This guarantees that illegal income taxes and other taxes will have to rise, further enslaving Americans…i.e, gas prices, electricity, food–all inflation based because ‘we’ bought the debt created by the politicians.
  • The SCOTUS discussion of Obamacare, where it was fairly clear that the Justices have a problem with the lack of constitutionality of the entire bill, particularly the mandate.  Obama’s reversal of his attack on Clinton’s health care plan and Obama’s threatening the Supreme Court on ‘judicial activism’ or overturning a ‘democratically passed’ bill by the supermajority left in Congress–and against the will of the American people
  • Obama’s threat to the Supreme Court over Obamacare
  • The pressure on Syria and the now funding and arming of the Syrian muslim brotherhood rebels
  • The Muslim Brotherhood running its financier candidate for President in Egypt, despite promises not to run a candidate, and the ‘shock’ of the Obama administration which armed and trained them
  • The civil war in Libya and the US involvement in Kaddafi’s murder
  • Obama’s ‘hot mic’ treason confession to the Russian president, which further masks Obama’s intent to steal the 2012 election
  • The fact of Republicans once again making a deal so that they run a nobody who (a) has no chance to beat Obama, or is (b) exactly the same as Obama, still controlled by the FED and international financiers, giving Americans once again the choice between the ‘lesser of two evils’
  • Obama accusing the republicans of that which he is a proponent of–social darwinism (that was bold)

The Anti-Christ Exposed

Don’t forget that all of this is trying to hide the fact that ‘anti-christ’ thinking has been exposed–in the luciferian bankers and politicians, the ‘left’, the muslims, the ‘progressives’, and all those lying wonders we have been warned about.  It may not be one individual at all, but a whole way of being mastered by multiple entities and individuals.  Which means we are completely vulnerable to deception by great ‘lying wonders’ produced by all of them–earthquakes, storms, tornadoes, even UFO’s–a Nazi technology.

All roads still lead back to Rome, the Jesuits, and the luciferian army which is having a field day with our confusion.  It is intentional.

Keep your eyes and ears wide open lest we fall to the temptation of minutiae which means nothing in the larger scale of things.  We ARE in the end-times, keep your focus on the true God.

What else are we missing and not supposed to see?

Americans v. Usurper

©2012 drkate

Sheriff Arpaio answers audience questions March 31, 2012

I walked into the crowded room to find hundreds of people closely listening to the words of Mike Zullo, Cold Case Posse Investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona.  The listening was so intent you could hear a pin drop. I made the hours long drive in order to sign a petition, for Arizona residents, and to hear the latest report from the Cold Case Posse.

Petition Requesting a RESOLUTION as per ARS 41-121-1

For Arizona Residents Only.

To: The Arizona State Senate; The Arizona State House; Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett

Petition Requesting a RESOLUTION as per ARS 41-121-1. The Secretary of State shall: Receive bills and resolutions from the legislature, and perform such other duties as devolve upon the Secretary of State by resolution of the two houses or either of them.

Hundreds crowd Cold Case Posse meeting

We the undersigned Arizona citizens are requesting that the Arizona House, and / or the Arizona Senate pass a RESOLUTION directing Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett to send a certified letter to Democratic National Committee Chairperson, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, requesting that she produce certified source documents that are satisfactory to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office that positively identify the U.S. natural born citizenship and the Selective Service System Registration of Barack Hussein Obama II, With the recent findings of the MCSO Cold-Case Posse, there is probable cause to believe that Barack Hussein Obama II’s Selective Service System Registration Form and his State of Hawaii Certification of Live Birth Form are criminal forgeries, it is imperative to determine Barack Hussein Obama II’s status regarding his eligibility to be placed on the 2012 Arizona ballot.

Methodically, Mike Zullo briefed the audience on many of the facets of this now criminal investigation into the production of Obama’s false documentation, which he used to cheat and lie his way into the White House in 2008 with full democratic party cover.  They intend to cover for him again, that is, unless the Sheriff and American citizens have their say.

Zullo discussed several factors on the forged selective service registration form that have not been shared widely, including the necessary manipulation of the “8″ in “80″ in order for the upside down stamp from a ’2008′ official stamp to actually look like “80″ instead of an upside down ’8′.  This selective service registration form must have been one of those ‘forgotten’ forms to fill the record, because it had to use a 2008 stamp…meaning that this form was placed in the file in 2008, not 1980 as claimed.

Several long-time constitutional activists have been in Arizona for the last week, where Lord Monkton–who warned Americans of the global warming scam– and other individuals have visited with and been interviewed by Sheriff Arpaio.  While the criminal investigation is underway in the United States, the investigation will soon have international fronts opening up.  Other countries, who surely see the danger America is in from this criminal usurper, may be of assistance as they are threatened by the illegal actions of Obama as well. How can you sign treaties with a criminal usurper who can’t represent the United States?

Constitutional activists George Miller (Obama Ballot Challenge), Tony Dolz (CA candidate), Gary Wilmot (Article II Superpac) in Arizona

The audience was very concerned about the next steps, particularly in light of the petition being signed and our collective knowledge that the DNC will ignore this request even from a state legislature, or would sue in Federal Court to prevent states from controlling their own elections.  Several audience members suggested a grand jury be called to investigate–the Sheriff may have access to a sitting grand jury in Maricopa County. Since a Grand Jury indictment or presentment is required to charge anyone with a capital or infamous crime (felony), pursuing a Grand Jury presentment seems properAny seated Grand Jury should be able to consider the evidence as being probable cause for an official criminal charge within their respective jurisdiction. (h/t Tenacity)

Please continue to support the Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse.  By the way, the Sheriff told me that if he had won the recent megamillions lottery, he’d be running for President!   Now there is one candidate who would have the testicular fortitude to challenge Obama on his credentials to even run for the office! :smile:

The Investigators

Open thread!

Carnival Barky

©2012 drkate

The Chief Carnival Barker, Barrack Hussein Soetoro Soebarka Obama talks about what a distraction it is to focus on the fact that he has no legal identity in the United States.  So much of a distraction it prevents him from completely annihilating our country as quickly as he wants to.

This classic video was re-released by the White House on March 1, 2012, the day Sheriff Joe Arapio’s law enforcement investigation proved what Carnival Barky has been afraid of all along:

  • Obama cannot prove he was born in the United States because he can’t produce documents to prove it. Hence, we do not know his legal identity, nor can we say he ws born in the United States…

Hence, Obama’s nominating petition in each and every state is defective

  • Obama was not born to citizen parents

Hence, Obama has not proven he is an Article II ‘natural born citizen’ because he has not proven place of birth and citizen parents.

  • Obama is not eligible for the office of the president

Lock him out, lock him up

In each and every county, and in each and every state, the papers that the Democrats are putting forward–and Obama is signing–that proffer him as the candidate of the Party are defective.  The Democrats are committing fraud in each state right now. These are very simple points to hammer on, and now you have law enforcement to back you up.  What about the Sheriffs in your county…do they have the courage to stand up for the Constitution and to actually live their oath of office?

Head on down to your local democrat party office with a few signs letting them know you know they are committing fraud.  Write a few letters to the editor with these simple facts.  Put out a flyer or postcard, a poster or road sign: its time to challenge them on every single corner of every street in this nation.  If you can’t do that, support the Obama Ballot Challenge and the educational efforts of the Article II SuperPac. Yes, its been a long road, and yes, we’re asking again for your support.

Mouthpiece of 2012 democrat fraud

Create the record so that all of history and time, and our Creator will know, that we opposed the usurpation of the United States Constitution by the jackals, jackasses, and carnival barkers of the left wing sociopathic communist new world order odors of the 20th and 21st Centuries.

Update on Arizona Ballot Challenge

Plaintiff in the Pima County Ballot Challenge, Kenneth Allen, submitted a brief in opposition to the Arizona Democrat party’s motion to dismiss his challenge that is sure to make headlines and has already made the democrats steaming mad…so mad they have moved to strike the brief itself.  While it is expected that the judge in the case will dismiss it as all others before him, it is worth reviewing the standard democrat arguments and Plaintiff Allen’s challenges to them so as to ‘try your hand’ at using these arguments yourself.

Plaintiff Allen’s introduction to his argument opposing defendant AZDems motion to dismiss:

Comes now Plaintiff Kenneth L. Allen in opposition to Defendant Arizona Democratic Party (“the Party”) Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that Defendant cannot guarantee to the Plaintiff nor the citizens of Pima County that it will not commit fraud as it certifies that candidate Barack H. Obama is constitutionally eligible for the office of President of the United States. 

Typically, the democrats cite disparagingly the “49 cases that have been dismissed resolving forever the discussion the Obama’s eligibility:

Exhibit A (listing 49 federal cases and 3S state cases rejecting arguments made by “birthers” in one form or another. Motion to Dismiss, Az Democrats

Plaintiff Allen’s response:

VII. Defendants Erroneously Rely on Case Law that is Irrelevant to this Complaint.

Defendants, in a footnote (fn3 p 2), erroneously claim that candidate Obama’s eligibility for president has been addressed already by a series of cases across the country, cases which have never argued the merits of candidate Obama’s status as a natural born citizen, and cases which have never addressed specifically a ballot challenge. Defendants compare apples to oranges. Contrary to Defendants haughty claim, there is no legal authority or court in the country that has ruled on or definitively stated that candidate Obama meets the constitutional qualifications for the presidency

Defendants proffer Obama’s birth certificate released by the White House as proof positive of Obama’s birth in the United States, making it a central part of the case.   Plaintiff Allen’s response:

VIII. Defendants “Make Up” a Definition of Natural Born Citizen that Conflicts with Existing Case Law, cannot be supported by the facts and Cite No legal authority for their Definition.

While erroneously relying on case law that does not address the merits of the definition of natural born citizen, Defendants make up a definition by stating that candidate Obama is a ‘natural born citizen’ because he was born in the United States (Hawaii) to an American citizen mother, that is, a single citizen parent (Defendants at 2, 1-7). Defendants proffer Exhibit A, a purported copy of candidate Obama’s birth certificate, as proof of his birth in the United States.

Plaintiff asks this Court to take judicial notice of the March 1, 2012 findings of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio which state that there is probable cause that the Hawaii birth certificate proffered as evidence that candidate Obama was born in the United States to a U.S. citizen mother is a forgery and thus a fraudulent document . Defendants cannot definitively state that candidate Obama was born anywhere in the United States, which is just one of the characteristics of a natural born citizen.

Defendants also erroneously interpret Minor v Happersett and include the Fourteenth Amendment as necessary to the discussion of the term natural born citizen (fn6 p 5). The Fourteenth Amendment is not relevant to the discussion of natural born citizen as it concerns only the requirements to be a citizen of the United States; did not refer to or modify Article II; and never once mentions ‘natural born citizen’.

The purported Birth Certificate of candidate Obama (Exhibit (A) has been proven to be fraudulent through investigation of Sheriff Joe Arapaio. Because the defendants have brought the argument about the birth certificate here they should provide all documents for inspection and have made this issue relevant in this case.

The Arizona Democrats step in the pile big time…making up out of thin air their own definition of natural born citizen, and relying on fraudulent documents to do so.  They also erroneously try to use the case of Wong Kim Ark–long a standard bulwark of the flat-earth eligibility deniers–and the Fourteenth Amendment to argue for the illegitimate Carnival Barky:

XII.  Defendants Erroneously suggest the Fourteenth Amendment grants ‘natural born citizen’ status to candidate Obama.

 Defendant erroneously focuses on the case of Wong Kim Ark (69 U.S. 649 (1898)) and the term ‘citizen’, failing to recognize that the case is completely separate from and did not decide that Wong Kim Ark was a ‘natural born citizen’.  Wong Kim Ark became a citizen, not a  natural born citizen, of the United States.[1] Defendants also claim that candidate Obama is a natural born citizen based on his birth in the United States, a statement that is now without merit in light of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arapio’s report (id note 2). 


[1] Wong Kim Ark’s children would be natural born citizens of the United States if Wong Kim Ark married an American citizen.

Finishing the party off in grand style, Plaintiff Allen reasonably concludes:

Because Defendant cannot prove that candidate Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States as required by the Constitution, and cannot prove he was born in the United States,  this case should proceed on the merits of the questions initially asked of this Court. Absent this case, Defendant is likely to commit fraud on this Plaintiff, the citizens of Pima County, state and county officials of Arizona, and the citizens of Arizona by failing to conclusively validate the Party’s candidate for the president.

It is important to note for this case, as probably in others, the Democrats argue that they have exclusive privilege to select their candidate for president–irrespective of whether that candidate is eligible or not.  In this case, the Democrats argued that even with that right, the Plaintiff should bring in all other counties in Arizona to the dispute.  Challenging their authority, the Plaintiff retorts:

IX. Defendants claim a right to choose the Party’s candidate—irrespective of qualifications—to place on the Arizona ballot.

 Defendants ask this Court to dismiss this ballot challenge because it has the right to choose the Party’s candidate whether it has proof of the candidate’s eligibility or not. By stating this, the Party represents that it is representing candidate Obama’s efforts to secure a place on the Arizona ballot. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s motion to dismiss because Plaintiff does not believe that the Party has a right to defraud the citizens of Arizona by putting forth a candidate that does not meet the qualifications of the office sought.  Defendants have offered no proof of candidate Obama’s constitutional qualifications for the office, rely on patently fraudulent documentation (fn 5 p 5), and demonstrate disrespect of the Plaintiff and the voters of Arizona who have a right to vote for a constitutionally eligible candidate.  Defendants also demonstrate spurious disrespect for Constitution of the United States (fn 3, 4 p 2).

What the Plaintiff is pointing out to all of us is how much information we have already and that we don’t need to be lawyers to start taking them on.  This is a citizen complaint, written by ordinary citizens. Get copies of these documents from the Obama Ballot Challenge site, there is a lot of good material to use in your own letters and documents.  You will be well-versed in how the democrats use smoke and mirrors to deceive, and how to break them into so many shards of glass.

Rise America

Obama of Unknown Legal Identity

©2012 drkate

With thanks to the Surprise Arizona Tea Party Patriots, and to Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Humpty dumpty sat on a wall
Humpty dumpty had a great fall
All the king’ s horses, and all the king’s men
Couldn’t put Humpty Dumpty together again

While the professionalism of law enforcement was on display in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s March 1 press conference, the unprofessional lame stream media was painfully on display as they stamped their feet, whined, tried to divert attention from the topic at hand, and showed their biased juvenile anger that their messiah has been proven to be a complete unknown, most importantly of unknown legal identity.

  • Unknown birth place
  • Unknown citizenship
  • Unknown origin

The knowing liar

The entire obutt charade falls apart in an hour and twenty minutes on the now proven forgery and fraud–proven by the first law enforcement entity with the balls to take this on. The media asks itself the question as they try to get Sheriff Joe to say it for them–“is Obama living a lie?”  Whatever reporter asked that question is probably soon to be fired for being so obvious.  It was a trick that didn’t work, boys and girls of the so called ‘media’.  Fast forward if you’d like to the last 45 minutes or so for the question and answer session where the sheer idiocy of the flat-earth eligibility deniers is on display. Sheriff Arpaio’s report can be downloaded here.

What, no headlines in U.S. News, Faux, CNN, CBS, or ABC?  Perhaps they didn’t want to make their misprision of felony and covering for the Obutt so obvious.  Instead, we are treated to the murder death of Andrew Breitbart, the FED crashing silver and gold prices, coordinated with Rush Limbaugh calling someone a slut and Obutt’s meddling, voter fraud, and the Obutt’s plans to preemptively strike Iran–telegraphing his intentions through lecturing us against doing what he plans to do anyway.

From the video of the press conference, I’ve picked up several points:

  • Affadavits have been submitted stating Obama was introduced as a foreign student by Billy-the-cia-terrorrst-Ayers’ mother in Chicago in the 1980′s
  • Sheriff Joe knows the computer type and its location where the fraudulent BC was stored twenty minutes before it was uploaded to the White House computer system
  • The August 1-7 1961 INS records showing who came to Hawaii during that time period are missing from the National Archives with no explanation.  That is the only week in 1961 that is missing from the National Archives.
  • A person of interest has been identified in the forgery of the LFBC

The investigation is on-going, so while the kings men try to put Humpty Dumpty together again, or start a war, or wage tornado warfare on Americans, relentlessly Patriots make their march on they who would dare control us.

Criminal fraud and forgery have been committed. The press knows, the Congress knows, the people know.  The banksters know that we know.  GHW Bush, chief Nazi of them all, knows that we know.

What comes next? Pink undies? :razz:

Obama's Enablers

Looking for Balls

©2012 drkate

Well, the republicans don’t have any, and the democrats never had them. But these two can’t seem to stop looking for them…

did they really roll down the hill?

(h/t Jan)

If you’d like to add a caption, by all means be my guest! :lol:

In the meantime, here are some excellent interviews and events that took place this week:

  • Joe Bannister, retired IRS agent, along with Terry Dodd and Red Beckmann, discuss “The Law that Never Was”–the Sixteenth Amendment–on drkates Revolution Radio February 16, 2012. Pay attention to the questions that are asked, and answered, such as ‘what is income’? Check out these two websites for more information on one of the greatest hoaxes played on Americans since the founding of our country.  DON’T FORGET…that a free hard copy of Red Beckman’s “The Law that Never Was” will be given to the person with the 50,000th comment on DrKatesview! 
  • Obama ballot access challenges were filed in Arizona and Pennsylvania this week by two well-known patriots.  Please be sure to support these efforts at the legal fund established to defray costs of these suits as the Article II SuperPac, and check in on the efforts at the Obama Ballot Access Challenge site.
  • Georgia Superior Court asked to overrule the GA SOS and the judge-less Maliki’s erroneous decision

You see boys above, real Patriots do have balls, we don’t need to go looking for them.  The establishment will not have an easy time of it, as the Revolution will not be televised.

Have fun!

ARIZONA PASSES FIRST ELIGIBILITY BILL

BREAKING: REPORT FROM THE ARIZONA LEGISLATURE

ARIZONA IS FIRST STATE IN THE COUNTRY TO PASS AN ELIGIBILITY BILL !!!!!!!!!!

—-A report from Jeff Lichter

Yesterday in the Senate at 20-9 and Tonight By 40 – 16 – and 4 not voting in the House of Representatives.  I believe that every Republican on both sides of the aisle were YES votes.  Awesome.

It’s time now to start calling Governor Brewer’s office.  This may need verification and re-checking, but I believe she has 5 days (possibly as much as 10 but no more than that) to sign it.  If she doesn’t sign it at all, it becomes law.  The only way it does not is if she vetoes it.

WOW!!!!!   NOW COME ON OKLAHOMA, MISSOURI AND EVERYONE ELSE.  IF ANY OF YOU HAVE CONTACTS IN THESE STATES LET THEM KNOW RIGHT AWAY THAT ARIZONA DID IT AND TO USE THAT TO HELP THEM DO IT.   THANKS AND GOOD NIGHT.

And Give Us Liberty 1776 has a more direct message for Obama:

Continue reading ‘ARIZONA PASSES FIRST ELIGIBILITY BILL’

Attacking Arizona

©2011 drkate

Treason or sedition?

Continue reading ‘Attacking Arizona’

Judge John Roll: Target or Victim?

©drkate 2011

Judge John M. Roll

Federal Judge John Roll, the Chief Justice for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, was murdered in Tucson on January 8, 2011  in a shooting that killed five others and wounded several more including Congresswoman Gabriella Giffords. Judge Roll was certainly a victim of this tragedy, but was he also an intentional target?

Background

The EU Times reported a story on January 9 from a Russian intelligence report strongly suggesting that Judge Roll was the intended target:

A Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the top US Federal Judge for the State of Arizona was assassinated barely 72-hours after he made a critical ruling against the Obama administrations plan to begin the confiscation of their citizen’s private retirement and banking accounts in order to stave off their nations imminent economic collapse, and after having the US Marshals protecting him removed.

Continue reading ‘Judge John Roll: Target or Victim?’


November 2014
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,701,167 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 613 other followers