Archive for the 'Article II Superpac' Category

Obama Disabilities and the 25th Amendment

©2013 drkate

Gun Runner

Gun Runner

Long before the current manifestations of Obama’s incompetence, debauchery, and danger to America, this blog and a few others pointed out that under the 25th Amendment, Obama is disabled and therefore unable to serve in office.  His principle form of disability in the first instance was, and remains, his ineligibility to hold the office because he is not a natural born citizen.  Article II, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution requires that the President be born in the United States to two parents who are American citizens.

Obama set the stage for deceit by sponsoring a non-binding resolution (S.R. 535) that proclaimed John McCain eligible for the presidency even though McCain was not eligible because he was born off-base in a civilian hospital in Cologne, Panama.  McCain could not challenge Obama’s eligibility as he himself was ineligible.  And through voter fraud in 2008, the bought media, and the relentless use of race and gender to divide America, Obama coasted through the 12th Amendment procedure in the joint session of Congress to declare himself the pResident.  Not a whimper was heard from any of the so-called constitutionalists or conservatives, and every member of the Senate and House and every Secretary of State of the 50 States refused to do their duty and verify Obama’s eligibility.

Oh, yeah, I forgot…they all said “it wasn’t my job”…

We  all know that we were betrayed by the bench–the judiciary and the high powered attorneys–who twisted and made up reasons why the Constitution would not be followed.  American citizens spent thousands of dollars, risked their lives and livelihoods, were murdered, and were thrown in federal prison for daring to point out this most fundamental disability of the man who calls himself “Barack Hussein Obama”.

The failure of the judiciary and the unlawful lawmakers to follow the Constitution did not deter the investigations of Obama’s disability one iota.  Now we know that:

  • Obama’s birth certificate–produced on the White House website–is a 100% forgery
  • Obama’s Selective Service Registration is also 100% fraudulent
  • There is no evidence that he actually attended Columbia University
  • His real name is Barry Soetoro, and that he lost his law license because he failed to disclose his other names
  • Obama is a muslim and has lied about it consistently
  • Obama is at best a dual citizen (Britain, Indonesia) and never declared U.S. citizenship
  • ….

Yes it is possible to name more than a dozen characteristics of Obama that disable him from serving in any capacity of the federal government.  The penalty for selective service fraud alone is the inability to serve in the executive branch of government.  We know nothing about this guy who claims to be pResident…except that he is a tool of someone else.  He was the ultimate Trojan Candidate, and someone admitted the Trojan Horse.  His skin color and the enabling network became the condom shield through which he began immediately to screw America by fundamentally transforming the greatest country in the world.

Delusions, Narcissism, and Mental Illness

self-worship

self-worship

Never having worked a day in his life, the boy wonder began to fiddle while the world burned.  He has shown delight in an agenda that eviscerates our military and that degrades conservatives, and loves to participate in drone killing of women and children.  He has no problem invading other countries, threatening them, letting Americans die, and creating chaos at home and abroad.  He spends money recklessly to flaunt it in America’s face as we continue to spiral economically out of control.  Author John DeMayo notes:

Had a young Barry Soetoro been taught humility—instead of foolish pride—the boy who became King would have known better than to assume all his days would be full of accolades. Then again, maybe he is not capable of knowing the difference.
The serial lying and fraud goes beyond the observed diagnosis of narcissism, it is now bordering on the real possibility that Barack Obama is mentally ill.  Barack Obama is a failure, and now his signature death of America legislation–Obamacare just highlights his total incompetence and yes, continued disability to serve in the office he now occupies.  DeMayo again:
...Obama has never had to face failure in his life. Adversity perhaps, but not failure. President Obama has spent his life running away from his failures by seeking temporary and risky pleasures that fed his fragile ego and gratified his desire to be happy: Exotic travel, drugs, homosexual encounters, Islam. All collide with common man causes and a playboy appetite; all disturbing and conflicted excesses; all difficult for anyone to make sense of..
DeMayo believes Obama is a high-function mentally ill persona who is starting to show himself as all of his failures come forward:
…the high functioning mentally ill, live out on a constant limb, running between depression and excess to an occasional stop on a splintered branch called anxiety. A paramount fear of abandonment guides them to execute direct attacks against the things they wish to preserve and keep most. They are prolific liars and masterful agitators.
fuckerobamaNow, with democrats publicly turning on him, Obama is frightened and angry, and now more dangerous than ever.  He will seek to destroy anyone who disagrees with him before he can move on.  A good example is his purge of military leadership—over 200 officers who have counseled him to drop his war plans for Syria, to stop supporting terrorism and the Muslim Brotherhood, and who question everything from his rules of engagement (aka the tie one hand behind our soldiers back plan) to the betrayal at Benghazi.
The problem is, each day that goes on he becomes more dangerous:
Each day this man is allowed to continue to re-invent the laws designed to restrict his behavior, America becomes more dangerous; weaker and more divided. Each day Obama is disappointed becomes another day he attacks those that continue to hold our nation together, even if they are on his team.
Impeachment, Arrest, or the 25th Amendment?
Which brings me back to the 25th Amendment.  Because Congress has been incapacitated–with the National Security Agency probably having every one of them compromised–we can neither expect impeachment or arrest.  The conditions that invoke the 25th Amendment are no less challenging: either the President or a majority of his cabinet must move to replace him. Sections 3 and 4 of the 25th Amendment read:

Section 3.

Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

Section 4.

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

If the Vice President or any of Obama’s cabinet members expect to have any political future that does not include the gallows or a firing squad–for violating their oath of office and participating in treason against these United States– they might want to think about saving their own faces through this action.  If the republicans or democrats in Congress expect to have a future free of constant shame for having enabled this usurper to ruin America, they might want to save face by moving to remove Obama because he is unable to serve as President.
No, we constitutionalists, patriots and Americans are not going to forget what the political class has done to the once great America, but they can start correcting the error now.  Their final judgment is before God–whether they believe or not–and their destination is the eternal lake of fire.
7.21.08 Blitt Obama.indd

Consequences of Presidential Ineligibility

©2012 drkate

For all you flat earth ineligibility deniers, here are the consequences of your foolish behavior protecting this foreigner in the White House.  Got blood on your hands, boys and girls?

From the Article II Superpac


On election day, vote for the Constitutionally Eligible candidate!

Who’s Constitutionally Eligible?

Learning who is and is not constitutionally qualified to be a presidential candidate should be as easy as reciting the alphabet, counting to ten or learning to tie your shoe laces. There are only three job requirements

  1. Must be 35 years or older;
  2. Held residency in the US for 14 years prior to nomination; and
  3. Must be a natural born citizen.

We already know Republican candidate Mitt Romney meets Article II requirements (see http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/ancestry-ahnentafel-genealogy-chart-for-mitt-romney-by-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret/) and of course, four years later we still don’t know if Mr. Obama is a natural born Citizen. But what about the top four Third Party candidates?

We teamed up with Cmdr. Charles Kerchner (Ret.), a 25+ year geneaology expert, to learn if these other candidates met Article II requirements. We quickly learned that two out of four of these third party candidates are constitutionally qualified. The remaining two remain unknown.

Here is what we learned -

ROCKY ANDERSON – JUSTICE PARTY
35 years of age Yes, born September 9, 1951
14 year residency Yes, Prior to his serving as Mayor of Salt Lake City for two terms he was a practicing attorney for 21 years in the area.
Natural born citizen Yes, He was born in Logan, Utah to Roy and Grace Anderson both American citizens (see 1940 census)
VIRGIL GOODE – CONSTITUTIONAL PARTY
35 years of age Yes, born October 17, 1946
14 year residency Yes,He served in the Virginia State Legislature and then Congress between 1997 – 2009 and then practiced law in his hometown of Rocky Mount, Virginia.
Natural born citizen Yes. He was born in Richmond, Virginia to Alice Clara (nee Besecker) and Virgil Hamlin Goode both American citizens (see 1940 census)
GARY JOHNSON – LIBERTARIAN PARTY
35 years of age Yes. Johnson was born January 1, 1953
14 year residency Yes. Johnson served as Governor of New Mexico between 1995 – 2002 and in 2009 launched a non-profit titled “Our America Initiative”
Natural born citizen Unknown. Johnson was born in Minot, North Dakota to Lorraine B. (nee Bestow) and Earl W. Johnson. According to the 1920 census Earl Johnson was adopted therefore his son, Gary’s citizenship status is unknown (http://2012.presidential-candidates.org/Johnson/Parents-Grandparents.php)
Jill Stein – Green Party
35 years of age Yes. Stein was born May 14, 1951
14 year residency Yes. Stein launched her political career in 1998 by serving on  various health related nonprofit boards in Boston, Mass. Stein then began in earnest to build her political resume in 2002 by first running for Governor, then House of Representatives (2004) and finally the Secretary of the Commonwealth (2006) in Massachusetts. She won election to serve as a Town Representative on the Lexington, Massachusetts Town Board serving between 2005 -2008 before running for Governor again in 2010 and President in 2012.
Natural born citizen Unknown. Stein does not provide any information in any of her bio’s about who her parents are. She tells us she was born in Chicago, Illinois. The only biographical information found is from interviews conducted by Forbes magazine tax writer Peter J. Reilly who refers to her biographical details as “thin.” Click HERE to read Reilly’s interview and HERE to watch Stein tell his audience who her grandparents were but nothing about her own familial situation.

Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency

©2012 drkate

Abdul Karim Hassan is a naturalized citizen who wishes to run for the Presidency of the United States. This even though the Constitution says “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Hassan v Scott Gessler,  Colorado SoS

Business Insider reported on September 5, 2012, Abdul Karim Hassan’s series of lawsuits claiming his right to run for the Presidency have been denied in the Second, Third, and now Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.  A similar ruling was issued September 28, 2012 for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

The significance of these rulings cannot be underestimated as they affirm that the natural born citizen clause of Article II of the U.S. Constitution has not been trumped, abrogated, or implicitly repealed by the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment nor the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  These arguments are the same ones used by Obama’s lawyers in fending off the legitimate challenges to Barack Obama’s candidacy and presidency; by the secretaries of state to refute ballot challenges, and by the media, pundits, Congress and the academics to cover up the usurpation of the presidency by Obama/Soetoro.  Of course, the corrupt SCOTUS hears nothing, sees nothing, and says nothing.

Obama and his supporters, the Congressional eligibility deniers, and the media have been soundly defeated and Obama is still ineligible to hold or run for the office he seeks.  What is more interesting is that the legal rulings lend support to the charges of misprision of felony that all members of Congress, and all the secretaries of state face in contributing to the overthrow of the White House.

This article briefly reviews the history of this case and its rulings.

The FEC Filing 

Presidential Candidate Abdul Hassan ruled ineligible as he is not a natural born citizen

Hassan, a Guyana-born naturalized American citizen, filed papers with the Federal Election Commission to run for the presidency.  Astoundingly, the FEC ruled in September 2011 that Hassan could file papers and raise money to run for president of the United States:

But the agency also told the prospective candidate, Abdul Hassan, that his campaign may not receive federal matching funds because he was not born in America. However, the agency’s decision stopped short of addressing the constitutional issue of whether someone born outside the United States can be president.

Importantly, the FEC made clear that it was outside it’s jurisdiction to decide the constitutional merits of Mr. Hassan’s candidacy, saying that vetting was up to the States:

“This does not mean that he can go and say ‘look the FEC has said that I am a candidate, give me money, I’m official,’” said Republican Commissioner Donald McGahn. “That is not what we do here; we don’t certify you as a candidate. That’s what the states do.” (emphasis added)

Democratic FEC Commissioners had ‘trepidation’ in issuing this unanimous opinion because of how it might be perceived.  They attempted to qualify and explain their rationale:

“By saying that it is okay — it does give the impression that we don’t see a problem,” said Democratic Commissioner Steven Walther. “I think that we really need to be cognizant of how this could be misconstrued.”

To address this problem, one of the final sections added to approved opinion states:

“Notwithstanding this conclusion, the Commission expresses no opinion on Mr. Hassan’s potential liability arising out of his proposed activities under any other Federal or State law, including any laws concerning fraudulent misrepresentation. Any such issues are outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.”

“For us this is really all about what we are empowered to decide and what we are not empowered to decide,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “Nobody is saying that it is fine and nobody is saying it’s okay for this guy to be going out and raising funds.’

Ballot Access Denied in Colorado, New Hampshire

Hassan then proceeded to set up a website and attempted to get on the ballot in New Hampshire and Colorado.  When denied access by both Secretaries of State of each state, he sued.  He has filed five lawsuits which argued that:

… the Constitution’s natural-born-citizen requirement is a vestige of our less noble past, before we decided that discrimination based on national origin is a grievous wrong. (He points in his briefs to Dred Scott v. Sandford.)The lawsuits say the Constitution’s admonition that “[n]o person  except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Hassan’s lawsuits have already been denied in the First and Second U.S. court of appeals. And the Tenth Circuit rounded out the trio on Tuesday when it too shut down Hassan’s case.

Complaint Against the FEC’s Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act

Hassan initiated other lawsuits aimed at the natural born citizen requirement based on these assumptions, and filed against the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act  (26 U.S.C. §§ 9001-9013) which provides public funding to Presidential nominees of major or minor political parties after the FEC issued an advisory opinion that Hassan did not qualify for any matching funding because he was not a natural born citizen.  Hassan argues that the Presidential Campaign Fund Act is:

(1) unconstitutional and invalid, and (2) the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution1 is irreconcilable with, and has been“trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Now this is where it gets interesting.  The FEC as defendant submitted a motion to dismiss the case based on the same premises that have been used to try to defeat challenges to Obama’s eligibility.  That is,

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (emphasis added)

The FEC also argued that Defendant argued that this Court should deny Plaintiff’s Application because

the Complaint fails to present an Article III case or controversy, and alternatively, because it does not present a substantial constitutional question. (emphasis added)

The government moved to dismiss the case–using the same arguments it has used to dismiss other cases against Obama–(1) failure to present a claim upon which relief can be granted, (2) lack of jurisdiction, (3) failing to present an Article III case or controversy, and (4) failure to present a substantial constitutional question.

The one argument missing from the government’s defense?  STANDING.

American Jurisprudence and Constitutional Legal Thinking

The DC circuit court dismissed Abdul Hassan’s case. The judge’s ruling denying Abdul Hassans suit against the FEC is illustrative for the process the Judge followed in making its conclusions.  As opposed to ducking jurisdiction and ducking its Article III responsibility to hear cases involving constitutional questions, the court determined:

Because subject matter jurisdiction focuses on the court’s power to hear the claim, however, the court must give the plaintiff’s factual allegations closer scrutiny when resolving a Rule 12(b)(1) motion than would be required for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Thus, to determine whether it has jurisdiction over a claim, the court may consider materials outside the pleadings where necessary to resolve disputed jurisdictional facts. Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C. Cir. 1992). (emphasis added)

Regarding FRCP Rule 12 (b), the court determined:

A court need not, however, “accept inferences drawn by plaintiffs if such inferences are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint. Nor must the court accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.” Id. In addition,“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” (emphasis added)

In other words, the Court actually took on the issue, was legally entitled to review additional information, and ruled it did not have to accept inferences or ‘legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations’.  Every one of the Obama challenge cases was thrown out first, on standing, and second, using the measly excuses such as failure to present a case, lack of Article III jurisdiction, or the ‘political question’.

Article II Still Stands

I hope everyone who has been involved in the eligibility movement can appreciate the significance of these rulings for the Constitution, the requirements of the Presidency, and all the work we have accomplished over the last several years.  It is critical to inform your friends who are skeptical of the ‘birthers’ or disappointed in the perceived failure of the 100+ cases challenging Obama that several courts have affirmed the natural born citizen requirement of the presidency–that it still stands, and that we are right and always have been on this issue.

Significantly the FEC believes the States are responsible for the determination of eligibility, just as the Article II Superpac, the Obama Ballot Challenge, the extensive legal work of many scholars, and manymany others have indicated.  The 2009 Continental Congress recommended vetting laws at the state level were required, and the Article II Superpac will continue its efforts after this election and into 2013 to ensure a vetting process is in place at multiple levels, to make sure the usurpation of the White House by an unknown, unvetted foreign national never happens again.

Please donate to the Article II Superpac to ensure its efforts continue through and beyond the 2012 election.  The national security of our Nation is at stake.

Voices Without a Vote

h/t Article II Superpac, Obama Release Your Records 

Voices Without A Vote” is a short ad featuring the generation of kids who will be inheriting the Obama mess in years to come. It is very well done with a powerful message any and all should hear prior to November 6. It’s already been viewed by 300,785 people. Let’s help it get to a million by passing it onto our networks.

On January 5, 2012, Dean Haskins, Director of the former Birther Summit, wrote an article titled “Update on New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Virginia Sunahara’s Brother, Duncan Sunahara.” This week Article II Super PAC ran an ad in the Washington Times Weekly and Daily to draw people’s attention to Hawaii’s Deputy Attorney General, Jill Nagamine, using, some suggest abusing, her power by blocking the Sunahara family from securing baby Virginia’s original Hawai’ian long-form birth certificate and by extension ALL Hawai’an’s original birth records. Why the State of Hawaii is fighting this extremely simple request spending thousands of taxpayer’s funds is beyond our ability to even make a guess. Rather, we find it disturbing that the brother of a baby who died over 50 years ago can’t secure her original birth certificate. Think about that…hhhmmm….50 years ago.

If you missed Monday’s Tea Party Power Hour radio show be sure to check out the podcast by clicking http://www.art2superpac.com/radioshow.html . Monday’s guest was Paul Kengor, Ph.D. author of “The Communist – Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor”

FULL ARTICLE II SUPER PAC UPDATE HERE

**Help the Article II Superpac get these ads into newspapers in the swing states and in front of the electoral college**

Donate Donate Donate Donate

Obama Against America

©2012 drkate

Now that the fraudulent “Arab Spring” has turned into openly whipped up rage and hatred against America and the West, our liberals are still in denial. Their power, their privileges, their huge vanity is at stake. That is why they are desperately trying to fool millions of Americans for the next two months. Expect two solid months of Big Lies. ~Denial is Now National Suicide

The Racist-in-Chief

Obama’s hatred of America was so clear from the beginning that people like me began writing about him trying to understand why he hated the U.S., when for all intents and purposes, he has benefited greatly from all the United States has to offer–education, opportunity, scholarships, book offers…he and his Wookie beard wife both received law degrees from prestigious universities, only to give them up before being forced to lose them over lies and fraud.  His campaign was hateful then and is now, with racist, bigoted, elitist core themes, skullduggery, and thuggish tactics that bring to mind the Chicago Mob on cocaine and steroids.

He never was eligible for the presidency, he never won that election.  He stole his identity, money, forged his papers, and paid off the media with illegal foreign funds and then turned around and stole more money from Americans to pay his debt off and enslave us.  And here are his voters, his people, his media, trying to justify murder and mayhem around the world.  What kind of sick minds do these obots have to continue to lie about the child-demon calling himself Obama?  American Thinker is right:  their tender egos and huge vanity is at stake so much so that they would trade their children’s lives just to be around this thug-stooge.
And now we face Obama’s true self having come out as a gay, muslim psychopath intent upon ruining America.  It’s all out in the open now, as are his legion of useful idiots who continue to lie and cheat their way in academia, the media, Hollywood, and government, spewing a toxic brew of leftist ideology sprinkled with hatred, lust, lies, and deception.  They follow these blogs and spam them, take on fake identities,  and putting on the whole suit of satan, care not one whit for humanity and flaunt their Godlessness.
Igniting the World to Win an Election: False Flags from Here Until November
The recent flare-up in the middle east was predictable and planned.  From the so-called anti-islam film made by a government informant and Obama donor, spread by the lying national and international media, to the placement of a gay ambassador in a muslim country, to the fake demonstrations, to the failure of the State Department and Department of Defense to defend Americans and America is like a sick script against (a) America, (b) the First Amendment, (c) Christians, and even (d) gays.  Imagine the headlines in the Arab world as America enforces Sharia instead of defending its Embassies:
Obama compares his voters to the Ambassador killed in Libya; laughs or lies about Christians, doesn’t attend his national security briefings–why should he? Mommy Jarrett attends for him as he is not in charge…purposely enraging and insulting any normal American.  It is war on his grounds, and he digs it.
In the meantime, he covers for the FED enslaving Americans forever.
Pay attention.  This is an opening salvo to more false flags designed to intimidate and enrage Americans, and the only way we can counter this is to talk about it.  WARNING–no one is kidding here.  Lame Cherry didn’t speak about a nuke in New York for nothing.
In 2012, its Obama Against America. And he will blame you–America–for his woes.

Blaming others is what liberals do best. It is a sign of desperation, of the breakdown of an ideology that is no longer believed even by its own priesthood. Liberals live near panic because their beliefs are crumbling. Let’s give them a little push. The life you save may be your country’s.

DNC Takes Off Without Obama

©2012 drkate

As the DNC takes off without Obama, the empty chair

Article II activists are busy letting everyone know that the Democrats have a problem, and so will every secretary of state if they certify Obama as eligible to be placed on their state’s ballot. Misprision of Felony is in everyone’s future, notwithstanding the poor job the judiciary did in ‘protecting’ Obama by violating the law.

The Article II SuperPac sent its CPD letter out early this week, followed by another terrific full page ad in the Washington Times. Meanwhile, attorney Larry Klayman sent a letter to Bob Bauer–Obama’s forger in chief–warning him of certifying Obama as eligible when there is no proof that he is…suggesting that charges of election fraud are forthcoming. And the Patriot’s Union has a great initiative underway that everyone can participate in…

And while you’re at it letting everyone know about Obama’s Achilles Heel, take a moment to caption this photo!

Open thread!  :smile:

Article II Superpac Challenges Commission on Presidential Debates

©2012 drkate

In another bold move, the Article II Superpac challenged the Commission on Presidential Debates to live up to their charter and set forth their criteria for determining whether a presidential candidate is a natural born citizen.  Quietly working behind the scenes to place three full page ads in the Washington Times, and planning more critical advertisements at the Democrat National Convention in Charlotte next week, this is a powerful reminder to the Commission on Presidential Debates that one Barack Hussein Obama should not even be allowed to debate on the national stage, as he is not constitutionally eligible for the job.

Do we expect the CPD to do anything?  No.  But it is one more nail in the coffin where those who are anti-American and anti-Constitution are exposed for the public to really see.  We have seen Congress fail to vet Obama and wipe clean the Congressional Record through the Congressional Research Service; we’ve seen the judiciary time and time again refuse to follow the law, and we’ve seen the media turn into high-pitched desperate shillers for the penultimate failure known as Barack Obama.  Apparently the Supreme Court doesn’t have the intellectual capacity to deal with Obama’s usurpation of the Presidency.

Head on over to the Article II Superpac site…please take the survey/petition and if you can, donate $1 to the effort at the address listed on the site!

The Superpac is not done.  Key media buys will be made in the certain-swing states of Ohio, Florida and Virginia in the fall campaign to inform as many people as possible–including the electors–of the Constitutional crisis facing our Nation in form of Obama.  Send Obama and the wookie packing!!!

Article II Super PAC, Letter to Commission on Presidential Debates, 8-30-2012

RE: Commission on Presidential Debates: 2012 Nonpartisan Selection Criteria

Dear Mr. Fahrenkopf and Mr. McCurry:

As advocates for the Framers’ original intent, establishing in Article II, Section 1 that every President must be a “natural born Citizen,” the Article II Super PAC wishes to extend our sincere thanks to the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) for the proper priority you place on the faithful observation of this national security provision of the Constitution by citing it in the first of your 2012 Nonpartisan Selection Criteria.

It has come to our attention that CPD may not recognize or apply any specific definition for “natural born Citizen” in the process of qualifying candidates’ satisfaction of Presidential eligibility. If this is in error, we would appreciate any information on how you qualify Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates’ eligibility as natural born Citizens.

We are deeply concerned with the efficacy of our electoral process in general since we learned in recent years that no known state or federal government office, nor any agency or elected official makes any effort to authenticate Presidential or Vice Presidential candidates’ constitutional eligibility prior to their name appearing on the ballot. Instead, we are genuinely alarmed to find that stewardship of this keystone of our national security is deferred to the same biased, unelected and unaccountable political parties which advance their respective nominees. Furthermore, no official examination to substantiate any party’s claims of their candidate’s eligibility is ever conducted or even sought. For example, it is the FBI’s position that they do not presume to contravene the will of voters, so no background checks are conducted on candidates for any office.

As you are aware, a simple majority vote cannot overturn Constitutional requirements.

This utter failure of ballot security and blatant voter disenfranchisement, still unknown to most of the US electorate, represents a profound breach of public trust. Questions raised by the electorate in the 2008 presidential election cycle as to candidates’ true legal identity have exposed a lethal vulnerability in the Constitutional integrity of the Presidential election process. These unanswered questions remain an issue in the ongoing 2012 election cycle and must be addressed immediately.

Citizens pay for elections with their taxes and rely on elected officials, the media, and non-profit entities such as CPD to ensure the integrity of our election process. Voters harbor a very reasonable expectation that the true legal identity of all candidates be authenticated, that candidates are eligible for the office they seek, and that the elections, and the debates which precede and shape them, are incontrovertibly legitimate. In 2008, the media completely failed to meet its obligation in this process and, as we have already stated, our elected officials do not seem willing to accept the responsibility.

CPD performs a key leadership role as organizers of the Presidential debates and has a unique opportunity now to help mend this rift in our social fabric. Consequently, CPD’s working definition of “natural born Citizen” plays a central role in this unprecedented controversy.

Obviously, Presidential debates are, and have always been, an integral part of the election process. Because these iconic events have fallen under the direct control of the CPD since 1988, we urge you to take very seriously the ethical obligation established by your charter, your mission statement, and your candidate selection criteria to assertively act in the public interest to ensure that all Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible for office.

Toward that end, please be aware that, at this time, surveys consistently show that at least one-third of American voters either are suspicious of or completely reject representations of Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office of President. A considerably smaller number question whether or not Mitt Romney’s parents were US citizens when he was born, partly because his father was born in Mexico. That concern merits equal examination and resolution.

The point is that the issue of presidential constitutional eligibility persistently plagues the electoral process and aggravates the relationship between taxpayers/voters and their representative government.

Supreme Court precedent, recorded in Minor v. Happersett, recognizes a natural born Citizen as one who is “born in a country of parents who were its citizens.” This definition is a logical extension of the progressively restrictive citizenship requirements for House Representatives (seven years) and Senators (nine years). It is also the definition most in keeping with the underlying intent of the Framers to avoid, to the greatest possible extent within a free society, the insinuation of any foreign influence on the power vested in the Oval Office.

The idea that “citizen” and “natural born Citizen” are equivalent in status completely ignores the fact that the Constitution itself distinguishes between these two citizenship classes in the same paragraph of Article II Section 1 that establishes Presidential eligibility qualifications. It is important to bear in mind that the Constitution has never been amended to eliminate this distinction, and that the Fourteenth Amendment does not address natural born citizenship at all. (For more information, see: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html)

Some suggest that any “anchor baby” is a natural born Citizen, regardless of citizenship status of the child’s parents. However, Article II Super PAC absolutely rejects that any such interpretation could be reconciled with the Framers’ original intent. The Founding Fathers intended that a person who would be President after the founding generation had passed must be born with unity of citizenship and sole allegiance at birth. The President must have sole allegiance to the United States and natural born citizen status is the Constitution’s primary tool to secure that objective.

To say that every child born in America is a natural born Citizen is also to say that any foreign citizen whose child was born in the US could be allowed to raise that child abroad as an enemy of the US and return that child to this country in time to meet the Constitution’s 14-year residency requirement for President. By that reasoning, world class terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki, born in Las Cruces, NM to Yemeni parents, but raised and trained in the culture of Al Qaida, should have been eligible as a natural born Citizen at some point, assuming only that his tactics had remained law-abiding.

The assertion that mere place of birth or length of residency establishes natural born Citizen status flies in the face of repeated attempts over decades by numerous members of Congress – all failed – to modify the definition of “natural-born Citizen” to that very effect, or to abolish the requirement entirely. However, most recently, non-binding Senate Resolution 511, dated April 30, 2008 and ironically co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, recognizes Sen. John McCain as a natural born Citizen, partly on the basis that he “was born to American citizens” (plural) which would seem to contradict Obama’s claim to eligibility.

Despite his full knowledge of and participation in this controversy, and his avowed credentials as a Constitutional law professor, Barack Obama has never publicly claimed to be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. His eligibility has appropriately remained in question since he admits that he was born with dual citizenship by virtue of the fact that his father’s citizenship was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948. In addition, various corroborating evidence indicates that Obama may have become a citizen of Indonesia as a youth.

His repeated denials and ridicule for those who question his constitutional eligibility notwithstanding, Mr. Obama’s birthplace remains unknown since the “documentation” offered to authenticate his birthplace has been determined to be an outright forgery by the only duly-elected law enforcement officer in America who has ever conducted an official investigation into the matter, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, of Maricopa County, Arizona. Rather than an official certification, it is believed to be an electronic composite of selected data from his birth records and possibly from other sources. Sheriff Arpaio has pointedly asked Congress to investigate.

In summary, we ask that the CPD clarify its official position on this national security issue and explain how the CPD qualifies Presidential candidates’ constitutional eligibility as natural born Citizens of the United States.

We look forward to the opportunity to share your response with our membership and associated organizations.

Respectfully,
Helen Tansey, Executive Director
Article II Super PAC

Article II Super PAC Letter to Commission on Presidential Debates 8-30-2012

Crime of the Century

©2012 drkate

The crime of the century has been committed on our watch, though it has its roots in the 20th century scoundrels that destroyed the U.S. dollar, enslaved and dumb-downed citizens through ‘government schools, and terrorized generations with war, terrorist attacks, economic depressions, poverty, and disease.

The stunning end result of 20th Century madness is the usurpation of the White House by the foreigner Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro, in my view, a clear act of war against the United States.

From the Washington Times July 30 edition, the Article II SuperPac placed this stunning ad:

Congress’ fingerprints at the White House crime scene
The facts are in. We know, definitively, that the alleged Obama
birth certificate on the White House Website is fraudulent.
Congress must admit their culpability in this. They faced a
Presidential candidate with credentials based almost entirely
on two autobiographies full of composite characters, errors,
and outright fiction. Rather than step up and do their job, the
Democrat-controlled Congress failed to properly vet their
candidate’s fairytale narrative. Now the chickens have come
home to roost and Congress is desperately evading the issue
while trying to sustain the illusion of themselves as defenders
of the Constitution.

The shock of this usurpation turned to the finality of Congress’ participation in the cover up and to the useless, unconstitutional judiciary heeding instructions to ignore the constitution.  Yet the judiciary in particular is that crowd of  20th century lawyers who went to the ‘finest’ law schools that served only to undermine, avoid, diminish, and ridicule the constitution in favor of ‘case law’, made-up opinions with little or no founding in the principles of Constitutional law.  The death of Lady Liberty, brought to you by the politicians that scammed your vote while stabbing you in the back, all the time pretending to be defenders of the Constitution.

Representative Peter King shows us how:

And Commander Charles Kerchner reminds us how those two newspaper announcements prove absolutely nothing:

It is time for this charade to end, and for the pure truth to be revealed.  Do your constitutional duty and demand a full Congressional investigation…do not let them think we have ‘given up’.

Lock him out, lock him up

Open thread on the usurper, his crimes and cronies.

Null and Void

©2012 drkate

Wait a minute. { Shakes head.}

Everyone keeps playing the game of “fighting” Barack Obama’s “laws” when by law, nothing that the illegal Barack Obama signs is legal.   It is void, can’t be enforced, inapplicable. 

He cannot meet the test of natural born citizen, can’t prove he was born in Hawaii, and gets by with a stolen social security number and forged selective service registration.  And everyone knows it.  Proving again that they are complicit in the fraud committed on the American people of installing Barack Obama.

But they are all compromised like John Roberts and many more could be criminally indicted. So they will make the choice to betray their country to save themselves.

The failure to hear and properly address Obama’s lack of Article II eligibility results in the violation of  our civil rights  under Title II,  Section 1983  with the highest court in the land now a clear and present danger instead of a clarifying voice and protector of the Constitution’s separation of powers.  As it turns out, every single member of the judiciary is compromised as their jobs depend on the current regime being in place; that fact in itself is a violation of our civil rights.

As Ann Barnhardt said, the proper response is “junta” but that is not likely.

Short of the arrests that should happen by responsible military, FBI, or law enforcement, or the revolution itself beginning prematurely,  let’s propose a different scenario.

In walk the plaintiffs as themselves and file a Title 42 action against the latest federal judge to dismiss an eligibility case:

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

Invoking Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiffs demand a jury trial:

(a) Right Preserved. The right of trial by jury as declared by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution—or as provided by a federal statute—is preserved to the parties inviolate.

The evidence is finally heard by a jury of regular citizens who conclude the judiciary has conspired with the Obama administration to repel lawful citizen petitions, resulting in a violation of the civil rights of these plaintiffs and all Americans.

Assuming it is framed properly, what is the remedy requested by this hypothetical legal action? How is it enforced?

HAWAII VERIFIES OBAMA NOT QUALIFIED FOR PRESIDENCY: DUAL CITIZEN, FOREIGN FATHER

©2012 drkate

Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured … but not prove they are a citizen.”

***********

Hawaii verified two things that are fatal to Obama’s qualifications for the presidency: first, he has a foreign father who was never an American; second, Obama is a dual citizen.

Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s Milquetoast email request for Hawaii to confirm the ‘information on Obama’s birth in Hawaii, and to accept an email response, got him what he, the republicans, and Obama wanted: another false ‘official’ statement from Hawaii’s Department of Heath (HDOH) supposedly validating Obama’s birth in Hawaii.  Ah, more ‘stuff’ that they can hide behind, claiming ‘due diligence’ has been done.

Hoping to put an end to the story,those pesky ballot challenges and Sheriffs, Hawaii and the AZ SoS perpetuate the myth and meme of ‘born in the USA”, or “American citizen”–as the only qualifying factor for President– to deceive the voting public.  The Hawaii release did not authenticate Obama’s 2011 electronic version of the Birth Certificate, leaving Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation in tact and relevant.  Hawaii also did not verify anything about Obama’s adoption.

We told you.

What no one expected was to have Barack Obama’s dual citizenship confirmed, again, by listing the name and birthplace of the father Barack Obama Senior and Kenya, East Africa (lots of name changes there since the 2008 short form).  Barack Obama junior was born a dual citizen of Britain and the United States.  The failure for Mr. Obama is that once born a British citizen, one cannot lose that citizenship unless it is specifically renounced.  His Kenyan citizenship may have expired unless he claimed it in 1983-but not his original British bonafides.

Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution requires the president to be either in either one of two citizenship categories:

  1.  a ‘natural born citizen’, or
  2.  a ‘citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution’:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Solid Constitutional, legal, and historic information support the definition of natural born citizen that must be used until the United States Supreme Court says differently.  A natural born citizen is born in the United States of parents who are American citizens.  Not a single parent; not the mother or the father, but both parents.

Obama has a foreign father thus fails the two-citizen parent test.

The consistent mistakes made by all deniers of Article II include citing erroneous case law, the 14th Amendment, or stating Article II reads that ‘citizens’ are allowed to be President, ignoring the necessary phrase ‘at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution’ in context. Other mistakes are made in looking to English Common Law’s definitions of and rules for acquiring ‘citizenship’.  A British citizen-subject is not an American natural born citizen.

But even if these common mistakes that Obama supporters and attorneys make are allowed to stand in court, no one can say that Article II permits a dual citizen to be the president

You have to be ‘natural born’ or, a ‘citizen at the time of the adoption of this Constitution’.  The Constitution does not add that category dual citizen as eligible for the Presidency. Nothing in any further legislation or amendment makes the Presidency open to being filled by a ‘naturalized’ American citizen.

The bottom line is that even if you think there is ambiguity in the definition of ‘natural born citizen’, there is NO AMBIGUITY that a dual citizen cannot be president or vice president of the United States.

Bennett’s Mistake is an Opening

Bennett makes his first mistake by asking only if Obama was born in Hawaii.  In doing so, Bennett actually takes it upon himself to define natural born citizen as ‘born in the USA” in contrast to 200 years of Constitutional law and Supreme Court case law in the United States. Furthermore, by ignoring the citizenship of Barack Obama’s father and Obama’s resulting dual citizenship, Bennett is unlawfully expanding the definition of natural born citizen to include dual citizens. As the State’s top election official, he has no authority to change the definition of natural born citizen nor to expand the classes of citizens qualified to hold the office.

After informing Secretary Bennett of Mr. Obama’s statement admitting the British Nationality Act governs his citizenship, the next series of questions for Secretary Bennett could include:

  • Does the Constitution permit a dual citizen to hold the office of President?
  • Does the Constitution permit a ‘naturalized’ citizen to hold the office of President?
  • Has Barack Obama renounced his dual citizenship with Britain?
  • Does Barack Obama’s known adoption by an Indonesian affect his existing dual citizenship?
  • Has Barack Obama naturalized as an American citizen?

These are questions Secretary Bennett should forward to the Attorney General.  An honest investigation will find that unless the Constitution is formally amended or the Supreme Court rules on these questions, Mr. Obama cannot qualify for Arizona’s ballot.

(update) This information, coupled with his publicist’s printing of  his biography raises significant doubt as to the legal validity or wisdom of placing Barack Obama on the ballot.  After all is said and done, this is misprision of felony!

Let this be the due diligence Arizonan’s require and their public servants provide. Let this effort lock him out of our White House forever!

Information Special Update by Jerome Corsi

Start at 2 hours, 15 minutes till end  for news on the Obama investigation, and much more, from Jerome Corsi (h/t j2j2):

 

Americans v. Usurper

©2012 drkate

Sheriff Arpaio answers audience questions March 31, 2012

I walked into the crowded room to find hundreds of people closely listening to the words of Mike Zullo, Cold Case Posse Investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona.  The listening was so intent you could hear a pin drop. I made the hours long drive in order to sign a petition, for Arizona residents, and to hear the latest report from the Cold Case Posse.

Petition Requesting a RESOLUTION as per ARS 41-121-1

For Arizona Residents Only.

To: The Arizona State Senate; The Arizona State House; Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett

Petition Requesting a RESOLUTION as per ARS 41-121-1. The Secretary of State shall: Receive bills and resolutions from the legislature, and perform such other duties as devolve upon the Secretary of State by resolution of the two houses or either of them.

Hundreds crowd Cold Case Posse meeting

We the undersigned Arizona citizens are requesting that the Arizona House, and / or the Arizona Senate pass a RESOLUTION directing Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett to send a certified letter to Democratic National Committee Chairperson, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, requesting that she produce certified source documents that are satisfactory to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office that positively identify the U.S. natural born citizenship and the Selective Service System Registration of Barack Hussein Obama II, With the recent findings of the MCSO Cold-Case Posse, there is probable cause to believe that Barack Hussein Obama II’s Selective Service System Registration Form and his State of Hawaii Certification of Live Birth Form are criminal forgeries, it is imperative to determine Barack Hussein Obama II’s status regarding his eligibility to be placed on the 2012 Arizona ballot.

Methodically, Mike Zullo briefed the audience on many of the facets of this now criminal investigation into the production of Obama’s false documentation, which he used to cheat and lie his way into the White House in 2008 with full democratic party cover.  They intend to cover for him again, that is, unless the Sheriff and American citizens have their say.

Zullo discussed several factors on the forged selective service registration form that have not been shared widely, including the necessary manipulation of the “8″ in “80″ in order for the upside down stamp from a ’2008′ official stamp to actually look like “80″ instead of an upside down ’8′.  This selective service registration form must have been one of those ‘forgotten’ forms to fill the record, because it had to use a 2008 stamp…meaning that this form was placed in the file in 2008, not 1980 as claimed.

Several long-time constitutional activists have been in Arizona for the last week, where Lord Monkton–who warned Americans of the global warming scam– and other individuals have visited with and been interviewed by Sheriff Arpaio.  While the criminal investigation is underway in the United States, the investigation will soon have international fronts opening up.  Other countries, who surely see the danger America is in from this criminal usurper, may be of assistance as they are threatened by the illegal actions of Obama as well. How can you sign treaties with a criminal usurper who can’t represent the United States?

Constitutional activists George Miller (Obama Ballot Challenge), Tony Dolz (CA candidate), Gary Wilmot (Article II Superpac) in Arizona

The audience was very concerned about the next steps, particularly in light of the petition being signed and our collective knowledge that the DNC will ignore this request even from a state legislature, or would sue in Federal Court to prevent states from controlling their own elections.  Several audience members suggested a grand jury be called to investigate–the Sheriff may have access to a sitting grand jury in Maricopa County. Since a Grand Jury indictment or presentment is required to charge anyone with a capital or infamous crime (felony), pursuing a Grand Jury presentment seems properAny seated Grand Jury should be able to consider the evidence as being probable cause for an official criminal charge within their respective jurisdiction. (h/t Tenacity)

Please continue to support the Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse.  By the way, the Sheriff told me that if he had won the recent megamillions lottery, he’d be running for President!   Now there is one candidate who would have the testicular fortitude to challenge Obama on his credentials to even run for the office! :smile:

The Investigators

Open thread!

Carnival Barky

©2012 drkate

The Chief Carnival Barker, Barrack Hussein Soetoro Soebarka Obama talks about what a distraction it is to focus on the fact that he has no legal identity in the United States.  So much of a distraction it prevents him from completely annihilating our country as quickly as he wants to.

This classic video was re-released by the White House on March 1, 2012, the day Sheriff Joe Arapio’s law enforcement investigation proved what Carnival Barky has been afraid of all along:

  • Obama cannot prove he was born in the United States because he can’t produce documents to prove it. Hence, we do not know his legal identity, nor can we say he ws born in the United States…

Hence, Obama’s nominating petition in each and every state is defective

  • Obama was not born to citizen parents

Hence, Obama has not proven he is an Article II ‘natural born citizen’ because he has not proven place of birth and citizen parents.

  • Obama is not eligible for the office of the president

Lock him out, lock him up

In each and every county, and in each and every state, the papers that the Democrats are putting forward–and Obama is signing–that proffer him as the candidate of the Party are defective.  The Democrats are committing fraud in each state right now. These are very simple points to hammer on, and now you have law enforcement to back you up.  What about the Sheriffs in your county…do they have the courage to stand up for the Constitution and to actually live their oath of office?

Head on down to your local democrat party office with a few signs letting them know you know they are committing fraud.  Write a few letters to the editor with these simple facts.  Put out a flyer or postcard, a poster or road sign: its time to challenge them on every single corner of every street in this nation.  If you can’t do that, support the Obama Ballot Challenge and the educational efforts of the Article II SuperPac. Yes, its been a long road, and yes, we’re asking again for your support.

Mouthpiece of 2012 democrat fraud

Create the record so that all of history and time, and our Creator will know, that we opposed the usurpation of the United States Constitution by the jackals, jackasses, and carnival barkers of the left wing sociopathic communist new world order odors of the 20th and 21st Centuries.

Update on Arizona Ballot Challenge

Plaintiff in the Pima County Ballot Challenge, Kenneth Allen, submitted a brief in opposition to the Arizona Democrat party’s motion to dismiss his challenge that is sure to make headlines and has already made the democrats steaming mad…so mad they have moved to strike the brief itself.  While it is expected that the judge in the case will dismiss it as all others before him, it is worth reviewing the standard democrat arguments and Plaintiff Allen’s challenges to them so as to ‘try your hand’ at using these arguments yourself.

Plaintiff Allen’s introduction to his argument opposing defendant AZDems motion to dismiss:

Comes now Plaintiff Kenneth L. Allen in opposition to Defendant Arizona Democratic Party (“the Party”) Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that Defendant cannot guarantee to the Plaintiff nor the citizens of Pima County that it will not commit fraud as it certifies that candidate Barack H. Obama is constitutionally eligible for the office of President of the United States. 

Typically, the democrats cite disparagingly the “49 cases that have been dismissed resolving forever the discussion the Obama’s eligibility:

Exhibit A (listing 49 federal cases and 3S state cases rejecting arguments made by “birthers” in one form or another. Motion to Dismiss, Az Democrats

Plaintiff Allen’s response:

VII. Defendants Erroneously Rely on Case Law that is Irrelevant to this Complaint.

Defendants, in a footnote (fn3 p 2), erroneously claim that candidate Obama’s eligibility for president has been addressed already by a series of cases across the country, cases which have never argued the merits of candidate Obama’s status as a natural born citizen, and cases which have never addressed specifically a ballot challenge. Defendants compare apples to oranges. Contrary to Defendants haughty claim, there is no legal authority or court in the country that has ruled on or definitively stated that candidate Obama meets the constitutional qualifications for the presidency

Defendants proffer Obama’s birth certificate released by the White House as proof positive of Obama’s birth in the United States, making it a central part of the case.   Plaintiff Allen’s response:

VIII. Defendants “Make Up” a Definition of Natural Born Citizen that Conflicts with Existing Case Law, cannot be supported by the facts and Cite No legal authority for their Definition.

While erroneously relying on case law that does not address the merits of the definition of natural born citizen, Defendants make up a definition by stating that candidate Obama is a ‘natural born citizen’ because he was born in the United States (Hawaii) to an American citizen mother, that is, a single citizen parent (Defendants at 2, 1-7). Defendants proffer Exhibit A, a purported copy of candidate Obama’s birth certificate, as proof of his birth in the United States.

Plaintiff asks this Court to take judicial notice of the March 1, 2012 findings of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio which state that there is probable cause that the Hawaii birth certificate proffered as evidence that candidate Obama was born in the United States to a U.S. citizen mother is a forgery and thus a fraudulent document . Defendants cannot definitively state that candidate Obama was born anywhere in the United States, which is just one of the characteristics of a natural born citizen.

Defendants also erroneously interpret Minor v Happersett and include the Fourteenth Amendment as necessary to the discussion of the term natural born citizen (fn6 p 5). The Fourteenth Amendment is not relevant to the discussion of natural born citizen as it concerns only the requirements to be a citizen of the United States; did not refer to or modify Article II; and never once mentions ‘natural born citizen’.

The purported Birth Certificate of candidate Obama (Exhibit (A) has been proven to be fraudulent through investigation of Sheriff Joe Arapaio. Because the defendants have brought the argument about the birth certificate here they should provide all documents for inspection and have made this issue relevant in this case.

The Arizona Democrats step in the pile big time…making up out of thin air their own definition of natural born citizen, and relying on fraudulent documents to do so.  They also erroneously try to use the case of Wong Kim Ark–long a standard bulwark of the flat-earth eligibility deniers–and the Fourteenth Amendment to argue for the illegitimate Carnival Barky:

XII.  Defendants Erroneously suggest the Fourteenth Amendment grants ‘natural born citizen’ status to candidate Obama.

 Defendant erroneously focuses on the case of Wong Kim Ark (69 U.S. 649 (1898)) and the term ‘citizen’, failing to recognize that the case is completely separate from and did not decide that Wong Kim Ark was a ‘natural born citizen’.  Wong Kim Ark became a citizen, not a  natural born citizen, of the United States.[1] Defendants also claim that candidate Obama is a natural born citizen based on his birth in the United States, a statement that is now without merit in light of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arapio’s report (id note 2). 


[1] Wong Kim Ark’s children would be natural born citizens of the United States if Wong Kim Ark married an American citizen.

Finishing the party off in grand style, Plaintiff Allen reasonably concludes:

Because Defendant cannot prove that candidate Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States as required by the Constitution, and cannot prove he was born in the United States,  this case should proceed on the merits of the questions initially asked of this Court. Absent this case, Defendant is likely to commit fraud on this Plaintiff, the citizens of Pima County, state and county officials of Arizona, and the citizens of Arizona by failing to conclusively validate the Party’s candidate for the president.

It is important to note for this case, as probably in others, the Democrats argue that they have exclusive privilege to select their candidate for president–irrespective of whether that candidate is eligible or not.  In this case, the Democrats argued that even with that right, the Plaintiff should bring in all other counties in Arizona to the dispute.  Challenging their authority, the Plaintiff retorts:

IX. Defendants claim a right to choose the Party’s candidate—irrespective of qualifications—to place on the Arizona ballot.

 Defendants ask this Court to dismiss this ballot challenge because it has the right to choose the Party’s candidate whether it has proof of the candidate’s eligibility or not. By stating this, the Party represents that it is representing candidate Obama’s efforts to secure a place on the Arizona ballot. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s motion to dismiss because Plaintiff does not believe that the Party has a right to defraud the citizens of Arizona by putting forth a candidate that does not meet the qualifications of the office sought.  Defendants have offered no proof of candidate Obama’s constitutional qualifications for the office, rely on patently fraudulent documentation (fn 5 p 5), and demonstrate disrespect of the Plaintiff and the voters of Arizona who have a right to vote for a constitutionally eligible candidate.  Defendants also demonstrate spurious disrespect for Constitution of the United States (fn 3, 4 p 2).

What the Plaintiff is pointing out to all of us is how much information we have already and that we don’t need to be lawyers to start taking them on.  This is a citizen complaint, written by ordinary citizens. Get copies of these documents from the Obama Ballot Challenge site, there is a lot of good material to use in your own letters and documents.  You will be well-versed in how the democrats use smoke and mirrors to deceive, and how to break them into so many shards of glass.

Rise America

Eligibility Cold Case Posse Report-Open Thread

©2012 drkate

The long-awaited report by Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Obutt’s lack of eligibility will be broadcast live for your viewing on Thursday, March 1, 2012 beginning at 3 pm EST.  World Net Daily will be offering a free copy of the report, sign up below!

PRESS RELEASE

 ARTICLE II SUPER PAC AND THE WESTERN CENTER FOR JOURNALISM IS CO-SPONSORING WORLD NET DAILY’S (WND) LIVESTREAM OF MARICOPA COUNTY COLD CASE POSSE INVESTIGATION INTO BARACK H. OBAMA

Phoenix, Ariz – Article II Super PAC is joining World Net Daily (WND) and the Western Center for Journalism to live stream the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Investigative Report of Barack H. Obama initiated following a request from Tea Party members from Surprise, Arizona. The Maricopa County Cold Case Posse is made up of retired career law enforcement officials, legal professionals and skilled investigators.

The seven month long investigative report will be released to the public on March 1, 2012 and Vattelevision, Article II Super PAC’s multi-media team, will be working with WND to bring it “live” to the citizens throughout America and the world.

WND will be providing an Executive Summary of the report and to be certain to receive it we encourage people to go to WND and sign up.

Helen Tansey, Director of Article II Super PAC said “We are thrilled to be joining WND, America’s leading independent news source who has stayed on top of this story and kept all of us readers informed since the investigation first launched.”

Tansey went onto say “no official source ever vetted Obama prior to the 2008 election, but just a mere political party. Well, that’s not good enough. The people deserve to know those who are seeking access to our ballots meet the qualifications laid out under Article II of the US Constitution, and for the first time an official law enforcement entity is doing what should have been done long ago.”

 The time of the press conference on March 1, 2012 will be announced by WND when finalized.

The live-stream can be watched live online at WND, Western Center for Journalism and Article II Super PAC.

Live-stream can be accessed at the front-page and here,

SIGN UP NOW TO GET FREE COPY OF ARPAIO REPORT AS SOON AS IT IS DISTRIBUTED TO PRESS MARCH 1.

The WND TV live-streaming event is also made possible through the support of the Western Center for Journalism and Article II Super PAC.

Open thread!

Obama’s Libelous Punt Fails

©2012 drkate

…Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.~ Brian Kemp, GA Secretary of State, to Obama’s “attorney” Jablonski

Employing the arrogance and stupidity that is the hallmark of the Obama regime, Jablonski the attorney submitted a last minute libelous letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp which completely misrepresents the entire case history of the challenges to Obama’s constitutional eligibility to hold the office he now occupies.  Contrary to this so-called lawyer’s assertions, no court has even considered the facts of the case, preferring to arbitrarily rule that plaintiffs have ‘no standing’.

This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia – that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process. (emphasis added)

The ‘theory’ of Obama’s ineligibility has never been discredited.  In fact, by rule, because Obama’s attorneys  responded to each case by never submitting anything contrary to what all plaintiffs have presented, Obama has admitted he is ineligible to hold the office of the president.  By never challenging the facts, the facts must be accepted as true.

Here are Jablonski’s ‘legalpolitical desperate illegitimate ‘concerns’:

  1. It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. Um, what planet are you on? Did you too go to Harvard Law School?
  2. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there. No, they didn’t.
  3. [the pResident] made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. You mean those forged, photo-shopped, no raised embossed seal pieces of trash paper, made available only to one reporter?
  4. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011).  Oh, the discredited and blatant incompetent liar named Jack the constitutional ripper Maskell?
  5. The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued. You mean politically uncomfortable but legally correct hearing?
  6. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. So the political party is in charge of determining eligibility, and as has been proven, can lie about it to every state?
  7.  Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires. A state can most certainly decide if a political party has lied and enforce the Constitution’s requirements, as stipulated in Georgia’s statutes!
  8. …we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26… Go ahead and do so at your own peril.

Jablonski should be sanctioned. An Order to Show Cause Why Jablonski should not be held in contempt of Court and charged with undue influence on a public official would be appropriate.  In addition, a complaint should be filed with the Bar Association for blatant misrepresentation of facts and libel. (h/t Tenacity).

Remember that Occupy Wall Street began with Obama’s OCCUPY THE WHITE HOUSE.

Get out of Our White House, and our Country!

Put Up or Stand Down, Mr. Obama

Letter to the Editor reprinted with permission

January 23, 2012

Dear Editor,

The nation appears to be catching on to the fact that they were duped by the Democrat National Convention (DNC), through dissembling and deceit, nominating a candidate that was not eligible to be on the 2008 presidential ballot. The forces that worked to keep the fraud concealed are now using the entire power of all branches of the federal government to keep a never-vetted and unqualified putative president in office by whatever means necessary.

There are 9 types of citizen in the United States. “U.S. Citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” do not equate yet liberal propagandists “dumb-downed” Americans through the decades to believe both types of citizenships are the same. It has been a deliberate plan to marginalize and/or silence the Article II, Section 2.5 Constitutionalists by calling them “birthers” and “racists.” The majority of Americans believe one only needs to be born in the United States to run for president. This misconception is the handiwork of anti-American entities who have worked diligently to shred the Constitution and usher in a different form of government.

All eyes and ears will be focused on an Atlanta courtroom on January 26, 2012 to see if Barack Hussein Obama will appear as a private citizen and prove his eligibility to be on the state ballot as compelled by subpoenas issued by Administrative Judge Michael Malihi. Obama’s counsel in Atlanta, Michael Jablonski, filed a Motion to Dismiss attorney Orly Taitz’s challenge to Obama’s eligibility to be on the GA ballot and for the first time in three years a judge denied an Obama request/motion in a court of law and the case moved forward. Then Obama’s counsel filed a request to quash the subpoena compelling Obama to attend the hearing complaining that [His] duties as president of the United States would be interrupted and that the subpoena was, “on its face, unreasonable.” Ironically, the motion was filed the day after Obama sang a solo at a fundraiser at the Apollo Theatre in Harlem. Again, request DENIED.

Contrary to popular opinion Obama’s eligibility to be president has never been heard on merit in a court of law. Until now all lawsuits filed against Obama had been dismissed for “no standing” or “wrong jurisdiction.” The decisions came from federal judges under the auspices of Eric Holder’s Justice department and Elena Kagan, Obama’s pre-election counsel and now, of course, sitting Supreme Court Justice.

There are many of us ‘birthers’ living in fear because we never fell for what we knew was brainwashing and propaganda being fed to the American people for generations. But we ‘birthers’ never forgot the words of a letter dated 25 July 1787 from John Jay to General George Washington as the Constitution was being drafted: “Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

On January 26th, 2012, will Obama again defy the will of the American people and maintain his status quo of living above the law or will we, the Article II Constitutionalists, have our day in court? Judge Malihi will consider the Supreme Court ruling in Minor vs. Happersett establishing the definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ as born in the United States of parents who are themselves United States citizens. The ruling is binding precedent as to the Constitutional definition of a natural born Citizen. Constitutional attorney, Mario Apuzzo at puzo1.blogspot.com in my opinion has the most consistent and well-documented papers on the eligibility issue where I suggest is the place to go to for back up.

Obama is also compelled to produce his historic documents including but not limited to his birth certificate, adoption papers and Indonesian school records. Should he not comply with the subpoena to appear or present his papers he will lose anyway because his name will not be put on the GA State ballot and the plaintiffs in the three cases to be heard will submit evidence of Obama’s deception and fraud not the least of which is lying on his application to the Illinois Bar. In the space asking for other names used by the applicant Obama entered “none.” Add to this his use of a CT social security number that was never issued to him and fails the E-Verify check. Intriguingly, the social security number is shared by a Harrison J. Bounell from CT, long since deceased but at one time a roomer/tenant in a home owned by the Robinson family. Now that’s just too speculative, too coincidental to be Michelle Robinson Obama’s CT relatives.

But then there’s the selective service record that ties to the social security number but is so fraught with anomalies that taken with the recent problems of a suspicious “Frankenstein” document posted on the WhiteHouse.gov website on April 27, 2011, the whole business reeks of ineptitude or is it deliberate subversive activity.

I for one will be all eyes and ears on Jan. 26. A decision one way or another will help me in my plan to form a coalition of Oklahoma Ballot Challengers to take our case to the Oklahoma House of Representatives. We have been rebuffed by gatekeeper, “Fran” on the election board [who says we have to be a presidential candidate from Oklahoma to file a complaint] and by the Attorney General’s office who will only take cases from the FBI and the FBI that says, “Its beensettled” and by our own Sen. Tom Coburn who says “Its a non-issue” to Sen. James Inhofe who says “Its a non issue” but co-sponsored a bill to change the definition of natural born Citizen to mean born anywhere as long as one parent is a citizen. Thank God and the wisdom of our founding fathers the bill failed as did the other eight or so attempts in congress between 2004-2008 during Obama’s rise to political power.

Respectfully submitted,

Miki Booth
Former Congressional Candidate D2-OK


July 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,670,735 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS The Post & Email

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 608 other followers