Archive for the 'Articles of Freedom' Category

Community Security

©2013 drkate

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.~ Thomas Jefferson

As we approach the day when the tree of liberty shall be watered, we must work to make sure our families and communities are prepared.

Our revolutionary right is clearly articulated in the Declaration of Independence:

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Open thread.

Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency

©2012 drkate

Abdul Karim Hassan is a naturalized citizen who wishes to run for the Presidency of the United States. This even though the Constitution says “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Hassan v Scott Gessler,  Colorado SoS

Business Insider reported on September 5, 2012, Abdul Karim Hassan’s series of lawsuits claiming his right to run for the Presidency have been denied in the Second, Third, and now Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.  A similar ruling was issued September 28, 2012 for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

The significance of these rulings cannot be underestimated as they affirm that the natural born citizen clause of Article II of the U.S. Constitution has not been trumped, abrogated, or implicitly repealed by the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment nor the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  These arguments are the same ones used by Obama’s lawyers in fending off the legitimate challenges to Barack Obama’s candidacy and presidency; by the secretaries of state to refute ballot challenges, and by the media, pundits, Congress and the academics to cover up the usurpation of the presidency by Obama/Soetoro.  Of course, the corrupt SCOTUS hears nothing, sees nothing, and says nothing.

Obama and his supporters, the Congressional eligibility deniers, and the media have been soundly defeated and Obama is still ineligible to hold or run for the office he seeks.  What is more interesting is that the legal rulings lend support to the charges of misprision of felony that all members of Congress, and all the secretaries of state face in contributing to the overthrow of the White House.

This article briefly reviews the history of this case and its rulings.

The FEC Filing 

Presidential Candidate Abdul Hassan ruled ineligible as he is not a natural born citizen

Hassan, a Guyana-born naturalized American citizen, filed papers with the Federal Election Commission to run for the presidency.  Astoundingly, the FEC ruled in September 2011 that Hassan could file papers and raise money to run for president of the United States:

But the agency also told the prospective candidate, Abdul Hassan, that his campaign may not receive federal matching funds because he was not born in America. However, the agency’s decision stopped short of addressing the constitutional issue of whether someone born outside the United States can be president.

Importantly, the FEC made clear that it was outside it’s jurisdiction to decide the constitutional merits of Mr. Hassan’s candidacy, saying that vetting was up to the States:

“This does not mean that he can go and say ‘look the FEC has said that I am a candidate, give me money, I’m official,’” said Republican Commissioner Donald McGahn. “That is not what we do here; we don’t certify you as a candidate. That’s what the states do.” (emphasis added)

Democratic FEC Commissioners had ‘trepidation’ in issuing this unanimous opinion because of how it might be perceived.  They attempted to qualify and explain their rationale:

“By saying that it is okay — it does give the impression that we don’t see a problem,” said Democratic Commissioner Steven Walther. “I think that we really need to be cognizant of how this could be misconstrued.”

To address this problem, one of the final sections added to approved opinion states:

“Notwithstanding this conclusion, the Commission expresses no opinion on Mr. Hassan’s potential liability arising out of his proposed activities under any other Federal or State law, including any laws concerning fraudulent misrepresentation. Any such issues are outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.”

“For us this is really all about what we are empowered to decide and what we are not empowered to decide,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “Nobody is saying that it is fine and nobody is saying it’s okay for this guy to be going out and raising funds.’

Ballot Access Denied in Colorado, New Hampshire

Hassan then proceeded to set up a website and attempted to get on the ballot in New Hampshire and Colorado.  When denied access by both Secretaries of State of each state, he sued.  He has filed five lawsuits which argued that:

… the Constitution’s natural-born-citizen requirement is a vestige of our less noble past, before we decided that discrimination based on national origin is a grievous wrong. (He points in his briefs to Dred Scott v. Sandford.)The lawsuits say the Constitution’s admonition that “[n]o person  except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Hassan’s lawsuits have already been denied in the First and Second U.S. court of appeals. And the Tenth Circuit rounded out the trio on Tuesday when it too shut down Hassan’s case.

Complaint Against the FEC’s Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act

Hassan initiated other lawsuits aimed at the natural born citizen requirement based on these assumptions, and filed against the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act  (26 U.S.C. §§ 9001-9013) which provides public funding to Presidential nominees of major or minor political parties after the FEC issued an advisory opinion that Hassan did not qualify for any matching funding because he was not a natural born citizen.  Hassan argues that the Presidential Campaign Fund Act is:

(1) unconstitutional and invalid, and (2) the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution1 is irreconcilable with, and has been“trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Now this is where it gets interesting.  The FEC as defendant submitted a motion to dismiss the case based on the same premises that have been used to try to defeat challenges to Obama’s eligibility.  That is,

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (emphasis added)

The FEC also argued that Defendant argued that this Court should deny Plaintiff’s Application because

the Complaint fails to present an Article III case or controversy, and alternatively, because it does not present a substantial constitutional question. (emphasis added)

The government moved to dismiss the case–using the same arguments it has used to dismiss other cases against Obama–(1) failure to present a claim upon which relief can be granted, (2) lack of jurisdiction, (3) failing to present an Article III case or controversy, and (4) failure to present a substantial constitutional question.

The one argument missing from the government’s defense?  STANDING.

American Jurisprudence and Constitutional Legal Thinking

The DC circuit court dismissed Abdul Hassan’s case. The judge’s ruling denying Abdul Hassans suit against the FEC is illustrative for the process the Judge followed in making its conclusions.  As opposed to ducking jurisdiction and ducking its Article III responsibility to hear cases involving constitutional questions, the court determined:

Because subject matter jurisdiction focuses on the court’s power to hear the claim, however, the court must give the plaintiff’s factual allegations closer scrutiny when resolving a Rule 12(b)(1) motion than would be required for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Thus, to determine whether it has jurisdiction over a claim, the court may consider materials outside the pleadings where necessary to resolve disputed jurisdictional facts. Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C. Cir. 1992). (emphasis added)

Regarding FRCP Rule 12 (b), the court determined:

A court need not, however, “accept inferences drawn by plaintiffs if such inferences are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint. Nor must the court accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.” Id. In addition,“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” (emphasis added)

In other words, the Court actually took on the issue, was legally entitled to review additional information, and ruled it did not have to accept inferences or ‘legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations’.  Every one of the Obama challenge cases was thrown out first, on standing, and second, using the measly excuses such as failure to present a case, lack of Article III jurisdiction, or the ‘political question’.

Article II Still Stands

I hope everyone who has been involved in the eligibility movement can appreciate the significance of these rulings for the Constitution, the requirements of the Presidency, and all the work we have accomplished over the last several years.  It is critical to inform your friends who are skeptical of the ‘birthers’ or disappointed in the perceived failure of the 100+ cases challenging Obama that several courts have affirmed the natural born citizen requirement of the presidency–that it still stands, and that we are right and always have been on this issue.

Significantly the FEC believes the States are responsible for the determination of eligibility, just as the Article II Superpac, the Obama Ballot Challenge, the extensive legal work of many scholars, and manymany others have indicated.  The 2009 Continental Congress recommended vetting laws at the state level were required, and the Article II Superpac will continue its efforts after this election and into 2013 to ensure a vetting process is in place at multiple levels, to make sure the usurpation of the White House by an unknown, unvetted foreign national never happens again.

Please donate to the Article II Superpac to ensure its efforts continue through and beyond the 2012 election.  The national security of our Nation is at stake.

The Sixteenth Amendment and the Federal Reserve

©2012 drkate

It is no coincidence that the two major actions which have undermined the Constitution and taken control away from the people occurred during the same year, and that they are intricately related.  The Federal Reserve Act established a central banking system in the United States–not controlled by the federal government–but designed to control the federal government. The Act was passed by Congress on December 23, 1913 and  illegally granted authority to a banking cartel to issue Federal Reserve notes as legal tender.

This allowed the U.S. government to borrow these notes–money–to grow beyond the boundaries of the Constitution, and pay them back to the central banking cartel with interest.  Where would the money come from to pay back the banking cartel?

“Income taxes”, aka, the non-ratified Sixteenth Amendment.

Notice the burst of ‘federal spending’ outside the Constitutional limits–for example, creating agencies, expanding the military operations overseas, creating laws outside of the eighteen enumerated powers that expanded the government after 1913.  The government borrowed money from the FED, and earmarked Americans’ personal income to pay it back. Declaring bankruptcy in 1932, the ‘social security scheme tax’ was implemented–and promised to Americans as a safety net in their retired years. We’ve all paid into it but the politicians stole it…my mother until her last day paid taxes on that social security ‘income’ that was in fact derived from taxes on her income all the years she worked.

The book, “The Law that Never Was”, researched and written by Red Beckman and Bill Benson, provides the historic documentation that the Sixteenth Amendment was not legally ratified. This book is being offered free to the 50,000 commenter on drkatesview.

In a series of “letters to the IRS” taken from the book “Do Unto the IRS As They Would Do Unto You!”, the author advises a misdirected IRS agent attempting to collect illegal income taxes to do the research himself to verify the non-existence of the Sixteenth Amendment:

  • Read the Congressional Record to check the intent of Congress in 1909.  Who was to be taxed–the rich, the middle class, or th epoor?
  • Find the resolution passed by the Congress.  Try to find a bill passed by the Congress.
  • Get Senate Document 240 (Library of Congress 1931–Serial set 9346)
  • Look at the legislative journals for the 48 states.  Why did the 48 states suspend their rules in their consideration of the Sixteenth Amendment?
  • Did the state legislatures pass resolutions or did they pass bills?
  • Check to see if these resolutions are binding
  • Find out why the proclamation by the Secretary of State is labeled PRIVATE LAW
  • Where is the President’s signature?
  • Can a law be passed without the President’s signature?

The Freedom Law School is offering a $300,000 reward to anyone who can prove the Sixteenth Amendment was legally ratified.  If you are instead more concerned about how to deal with any current “IRS Problems” this site provides some excellent resources and guidance.

As advised by Joe Bannister on Revolution Radio’s “Walls in our Minds” recent broadcast, it is important to understand the realities of challenging this illegality thrust upon America in the last 99 years.  The awakening of the people to this fraud is why the ‘NWO’ and alien financiers are so hell-bent on controlling the world through destabilization and defeating America as we speak, as these words are written.  Notice the only candidate to mention the Sixteenth Amendment and the income tax is Dr. Ron Paul–who understands the sound money system which our country was built on, and to which our Republic must return.

When the word of the income tax fraud began to be spread via public meetings in the early 1980’s, IRS agents would show up at these public meeting places and record the license plates of attendees…with the inevitable IRS notice of audit sent along shortly thereafter.  How astounding to find in the ‘confidential’ IRS Tax Audit Guide for Special Agents the following notes:

“An individual taxpayer may refuse to exhibit his books and records for examination on the grounds that compelling him to do so might violate his right against self incrimination under the Fifth Amendment and constitute an illegal search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment”.

“…go from us in peace…”

©2011 drkate

If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!” ~ Sam Adams 1776

And its 1776 all over again. We the people are at our own government’s doorstep, and we want our Constitution back.

For more than fifteen (15) years, the American people have petitioned the government for redress of grievances only to be turned away time and again while they continue to do what they please.

The Supreme Court passed down a decision in 1984 that said,

“Nothing in the First Amendment or in this Court’s case law interpreting it suggests that the rights to speak, associate, and petition require government policymakers to listen or respond to communications of members of the public on public issues”.

A recent decision reaffirms this…

 The right to petition under the First Amendment does not impose an obligation on the federal government to respond to citizens, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has ruled.

In We the People Foundation, Inc. v. United States, decided May 8, the court relied on two Supreme Court cases, Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees, 441 U.S. 463 (1979) and Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271, 286 (1984). Both concerned public-employee grievances.

This case was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court but certiorari was denied.

Is it any wonder then, that the political class would take this decision as a green light to do whatever they want and laugh in our faces about it?  And the corruption since 1984 has certainly deepened and spread…and now they have all let a usurper into the White House and refuse to address it. This picture perfectly captures who they are.  We should have arrested them while they dared to show their faces to the public.

Criminal enablers of Obama

Continue reading ‘“…go from us in peace…”’

Third Continental Congress, United States of America

©2010 drkate*

The moment the gavel went down in St. Charles, Illinois, on November 11, 2009, the Continental Congress 2009 became the Third Continental Congress in United States history, thus taking it’s historical place in the on-going battle for freedom in America.

On Sunday, May 16, at 6 pm eastern, an election of new Officers will be held, historically strengthening the work of Patriots nation-wide in our common goal of restoring constitutional governance to the United States.

Organizing this election has kept me away from these pages, my apologies, but sharing with you how we are doing this will enlighten you as to what I have in mind with Stop them Cold and The Revolt Begins.  We are using the on-line, confidential meeting space that allows break-out sessions, voting, polling, ‘white board’ work, brainstorming, sharing documents, video…

Continue reading ‘Third Continental Congress, United States of America’

Arizona’s “Shots Heard ‘Round the World”

©2010 drkate

Thank you, Arizona.

Arizona fired two clear shots over the bow of the dinghy bowbama (h/t LC)  during its 2010 legislative session: expanding state enforcement of  its own and federal immigration laws, and requiring constitutional eligibility determinations as a condition of ballot access in 2012.  Obama is surely sweating over both of these actions, but can only show his anger at the illegal immigration action. He is caught flat-footed on the eligibility requirement in his attempt to gain a second term.

Obama is fuming. How dare Arizona pass a bill giving its law enforcement officers authority to deal with the invasion of illegal immigrants?  While he vows to review its ‘consistency with federal law’ :roll:, Obama is caught once again letting the Nation’s defenses down, and this provides a perfect opportunity for the Several States and Patriots to act in self-defense.

The self-defense tool?  The powers retained to the states under the Tenth Amendment.

Continue reading ‘Arizona’s “Shots Heard ‘Round the World”’

THE UNITED STATES, INC.

©2010 drkate

Bridge to Independence (S. Cupp)

It’s another crossing for this writer: Congress, the President, and all the agencies of the federal government work for the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES, whose jurisdiction encompasses solely the ten square mile area known as the District of Columbia.

The stunning deception was to have hoodwinked the public for 139 years into believing that the jurisdiction of THE UNITED STATES, INC., extends outside the District of Columbia.

This inquiry began with an excellent opinion piece posted by Helen at the T-Room, inquiring in much the same way I did…

In 1801, the Sixth Congress, 2nd Session, Chapter 15, An Act Concerning the District of Columbia (a) also known as The Act of 1801, was passed accepting land ceded by the state of Maryland and the Commonwealth of Virginia to permanently form the seat of the government for the United States. Yet, in 1871, the Forty-First Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, passed “The Act of 1871 forming a corporation [in the District of Columbia] called THE UNITED STATES. The corporation, OWNED by foreign interests, moved in and shoved the original Constitution into a dustbin.“  Do yourself the favor and read both Acts and then read the highlighted link telling us the Act of 1871 appears to have changed everything our Founding Fathers fought for.

Continue reading ‘THE UNITED STATES, INC.’

All WE Want is America

©2010 drkate

Let America rise with You this Easter Morning…

This early morning finds me hopeful as I rise to greet the sun.  While the video below is true, everybody wants to rule the world, I know that all  we want is America.  Rejoice, for our intentions are true, and the truth, like spring, is irreversible.

I am grateful for our growing awareness as Americans…no rock will be left unturned this time.  We have 100 years of tyranny to reverse, and we know where it is and who it is.  They’ve had their chance to rule the world, and nothing lasts forever.

The people are coming, and we’re not leaving!

Have a glorious day! :smile:

Fishing for the New World Order

©2010 drkate

On the heels of Interior Department’s notice that the federal government would take 15.5 million acres of land in several western states into federal ownership, along comes the Commerce Department’s plan to take over the nation’s coastal fishing and marine resources.  WTF?

From the Beaufort Observer Online Edition:

…Obama has appointed a group called the [Interagency] Ocean Policy Task Force. The original idea was to plan Federal policy related to ocean fishing. But on December 14, 2009 the Task Force issued its Interim Report entitled: Interim Framework for Effective Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning.

Under the guise of fisheries management, however, the real purpose of the CMSP activities is to enable the government to regulate all resources uses:

The ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes are home to and support myriad important human uses. CMSP provides an effective process to better manage a range of social, economic, and cultural uses…

Continue reading ‘Fishing for the New World Order’

“Paradigm Shift”

©2010 drkate

Picasso

Put in the simplest possible way a paradigm shift can be described as a step away from some collective folly, or a removal of a common misconception…

One major ‘collective folly’ that most Americans are stepping away from is the left-right paradigm, or the mirage that republicans and democrats are somehow fundamentally different.  The left-right viewpoint has diverted our attention away from more important things like constitutional governance.

Although the concept of ‘paradigm shift’ has been most commonly applied to the sciences, there are ample applications of  paradigm shifts in the arts, society, the view that produced the Constitution, and the current American viewpoint emerging about government.   The step away from the paradigm can only happen when three things are in place:

  1. there is a lack of direct knowledge about a particular thing X,
  2. everybody  thinks X is Y, and
  3. there are irrefutable but ignored indications that X cannot be Y.

Apply this to Obama; the democrats; the republicans; your senators and representatives; agency heads, advocacy organizations, ACORN….

Continue reading ‘“Paradigm Shift”’

Beware False Patriots

©2010 drkate

It is in the air.  We are now in the 2nd American Revolution, as the giant known as the American public has now awakened from its long slumber.  The constitutional crisis precipitated by placement of a usurper into the White House mushroomed into an awareness that our Country has been and is under attack from within,  and that this moment is pivotal for America.  And, it is not exactly ‘just like any other time’, and has its own set of very large risks if it is not addressed now, meaning our lifetimes.

Obama’s stupidity and arrogance in and audacity of forcing a radical left agenda down America’s throat within the first few months of taking office has backfired.  And he will not recover.  Americans do not approve of Obama by large margins, the latest Rasmussen approval index  is -13.  Sixty percent of Americans would like a new President now.

The Awakening-Seward Johnson-St. Louis, MO

And just in time, the people have arisen… and are mobilizing…and we know that the energy generated from this awareness is HUGE.

At the same time, dear Patriots, what politician can resist trying to co-op this energy?  What Alinsky-minded, left wing social moron can resist trying to infiltrate and disrupt, turning us against each other? What profit-motivated individual could resist leveraging liberty for financial gain?

These are the people who stand on the lawn in the picture above, just out of sight, waiting to shackle the American people before we even stand.

Continue reading ‘Beware False Patriots’

The People are Coming, and We’re Not Leaving

©2009 drkate

The Third Continental Congress (TCC) ratified the official Articles of Freedom tonight, January 31, 2010, in an official webinar which at one point had 61 participants representing 31 states.  Our votes were tallied by state, so each state delegation had to coordinate their vote.  The final official Articles of Freedom document will be available on Tuesday morning, as well as a brand new Third Continental Congress website.

As with all of the Continental Congress’ in our Nation’s history, many of those who began in November did leave, for various reasons including serious differences of opinion. The final vote was 26 in favor, 1 opposed, and 1 abstention.

The Articles of Freedom are for the American people.  Tonight we rest; tomorrow, our feet, hearts, and minds hit the ground running.

Openings

©2010 drkate

The ratification of the Articles of Freedom, and getting the right document to the people, has taken about forty days, and forty long nights.  As I write this in the early morning, I’ve just finished a nearly 12 hour webinar in preparation.  Exhausted, I peer into the early rocky mountain winter morning, returning once again to the task at hand for our Country…such a long, hard road ahead. And then, the moon rose to break the clouds…

I see the light of truth, of energy within the gathered storm, the shape, texture and details perfectly revealed when even a small amount of light passes through.

Continue reading ‘Openings’

Ratifying the Articles of Freedom

©2010 drkate

ARTICLES OF
FREEDOM

*** * ***
The Works of the
Continental Congress
2009

The Continental Congress 2009 is near ratification of the Articles of Freedom.  Delegates have worked tirelessly since November 21 to finalize a stylized version that reflects the will of the delegates.

Oh we all agonize over unfinished business, and making sure it is readable, not elitist; that it embraces and does not turn away.  Eleven days we had, compared to our Founders who endured a war, years of debate, and five months of finalizing that amazing document known as the Constitution for the United States of America.  Did I tell you how much respect  I have for our Founders, and how I regret the paucity of brilliance, selflessness, and timelessness in our society today?

Continue reading ‘Ratifying the Articles of Freedom’

Militias, Firearms, and the Second Amendment

©2010 drkate

Behind the scenes at the Continental Congress2009, a debate raged on the recommended civil action for the chapter that would eventually become Article 4 of the Articles of Freedom, Militias, Firearms, and the Second Amendment. The debate was between, I believe, the sunshine patriots- motivated by fear, lack of knowledge. or both–and the real patriots.  We are so fortunate indeed that liberty prevailed.

Delegate Jeff Williams, from Washington State, put this podcast together for the Gun Rights Radio Network, and provides various clips from the proceedings and commentary that is truly an excellent representation of the debate.  Please go here for the podcast.

Announcing the PATRIOT PAPERS

©2010 drkate

I am returning from giving my first live workshop in my state for liberty activists on the Articles of Freedom, and find the hunger for liberty palpable.  The Articles were clutched in people’s hands like a road map already dog-eared from use, confirming and articulating what everyone knew. The Articles are not partisan, they are principled.

“What is next?”  I replied in the only way I knew, “its up to you”.

This is a time where the affirmation of principles is going to be as important as a glass of water. Affirmation of who you are, who we are as a people, and as a nation. We must be able to carry these principles while we strategically move to protect our Nation through 2010 and beyond, as we are under assault from every direction.

Continue reading ‘Announcing the PATRIOT PAPERS’

Hitting the Ground Running

©2010 drkate

Give Me Liberty

Entering this year strikes me as a strategic opportunity to continue the national ‘push-back’  against  the obama/socialist politicians’  initiatives,  and also to advance on several other fronts essential to the defense of  self, family, community and state.

I believe we also have to practice and actively engage in developing a vision of what Constitutional Governance is, what it means at every level. All the ‘visions’ we have of the future are of collapse, and while unfortunately realistic, from a quantum perspective, there is an equal opportunity that a different vision can exist at the same time, one that would overcome what might seem inevitable now.

Let’s see what’s up:

Continue reading ‘Hitting the Ground Running’

Freedom Festivals

©2009 drkate

The Third Continental Congress (CC2009) delegates will be hard act work after the first of the year spreading these Articles of Freedom (AoF) far and wide.  The hope is that people will embrace them as a vehicle through which to express the  general ‘angst’ felt among the public.  For example,  the AoF can be used as a ‘constitutional checklist’ for your candidate, no matter at what level and across parties.

Here is a Freedom Festival in Washington State with Jeff Williams, CC2009 delegate.  There is a lot of activity on liberty springing out across the land! :smile:

Continue reading ‘Freedom Festivals’

The Accountability Clause

©2009 drkate

3dflags.com

The Third Continental Congress’ findings regarding the last ten words, or the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment,  from the Articles of Freedom:

Wherefore, We the People now find the three branches of government to be in violation of the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution; the public officials to be guilty of dereliction of duty in violation of their Oath of Office; and their actions, as listed in the aforementioned Petitions for Redress, to be outside the boundaries drawn around their power and, therefore, unconstitutional.

It is a known fact that the ratification of the Constitution by several states hinged upon the secure passage of a “Bill of Rights”  to protect the states from the newly created federal government.  The states feared the power of a central government–after all, they had just emerged from a war with one. Thus the first ten amendments to the Constitution for the United States can be considered the States’ mechanism for enforcement of the Constitution.

Continue reading ‘The Accountability Clause’


September 2014
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,685,050 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 604 other followers