Archive for the 'Citizenship' Category

American Twilight Zone

©2014 drkate

Who needs imagination?

 

rod sterling

 

Open thread on all things in the twilight zone!

The Long Road Home

©2014 drkate

Ah yes, we can age date ourselves…

Everything has changed since then, grateful that I’ve finally awakened to the truth of where we are now as humanity, as children of God, as responsible Americans.  How the powers that be tried, and failed, to squish us all.  A friend of mine remarks that “they should have waited another 2o years, then it would have been easier for them…”

Make no mistake, they have taken out the best of us, some never to return, others afraid to be seen or tracked, others drowning in debt, strife, the struggle of multiple jobs, and the stress that kills.  For many, whatever is left of a ‘career’ now eeks out lemonade from a pile of lemons left by their dust.

Me?  I am on the road again making another transition…collecting a new self and renewing an age-old struggle, with now my role perfectly clear.  I made myself available to Him and through His grace a new dawn.

I will post as I can…please keep us all up-to-date with this Open Thread!

(Of course, some feelings never change…)

 

Lock him out

Lock him out

Responses to Federal Aggression

©2014 drkate

libertyThe Constitution for the United States set limits on the federal government, which we the people created to safeguard our liberty interests and to provide for the nation’s defense.  The latest federal land grab in Nevada is just the tip of the iceberg and was most likely a test to see how Americans would respond to such blatant actions on the part of a federal agency—backed up by Blackwater Mercenaries, Homeland Security, and federal land agency personnel armed with weapons purchased by our tax dollars.

But wait.  We’ve already had more than 100 years of tax fraud, and an illegal debt that has been racked up by the equally illegal federal reserve, created  illegally through a non-ratified amendment to the Constitution.  And upheld by every Congress since that time–no on principle but because they benefit financially.  As a result of this system, politicians have amassed massive amounts of debt–without our permission but certainly without our scrutiny.  This is illegal debt, not ours, but the widely discredited government of the United States–including “both sides of the (same) isle” will use taxation and rural land grabs to satisfy the debt.

When you borrow money from a bank, and can’t pay the loan off, you give up your assets.  The government considers Indian reservations, natural resources on so called “public land”, national parks, forests and monuments, to be “its assets” —available to collateralize the debt.  The target: rural areas in the western United States.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance

As discussed in this article, each state admitted to the Union of the united States of America entered under the doctrine of ‘equal footing’, and in each state’s enabling legislation “public lands” are to be returned to the States.  A map of the western united States shows just how the government ‘honored’ its promises and each state’s enabling legislation—by keeping public lands instead.  Billions of dollars are collected each year from these public lands and are derived from mineral leases, grazing leases, sale of water, oil  and gas, and hydropower revenues.

 

Gov Land Map

Notice that the largest landowner is the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), whose agents and supporters at the Bundy Ranch claimed that the “constitution is on our side“.

With regard to the politician known as Harry Reid and the Clark County Commissioners, it appears that their personal and family  financial interests were useful to the attempted siege of the Bundy Ranch.  Under the guise of rural economic development, and providing economic assistance to Tribes, the (national debt has been collateralized on) lands of the Bundy Ranch have already been “sold” to a foreign firm for solar energy development.

Did the Constitution allow the Raid on the Bundy Ranch?

It may seem like an obvious answer “no” to most of us who read these pages.  But for those who still disagree that the Constitution is the law of the land, the emphatic answer is NO.  On the concept of jurisdiction alone, the federal government and especially the alphabet agencies does/do not have the authority inside any state  on private lands for the management or theft of natural resources.  If we understand that the so called “public lands” under federal management are to be returned to the state, it is even more striking.  The Constitution itself can be used to defend rural America.  It is worth revisiting the following video for further background on the very limited jurisdiction that the federal government has:

Constitutional Response to a Wayward Federal Government

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.  JFK

By way of stating what this blog considers the truth, the Constitution for the United States of America, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence were divinely inspired and are derived from God’s law, which is “natural law”.   We have from God the gift of self-governance and the ability to enact His laws here on earth in our everyday being, interactions, and in our society.  The correct pecking order for “law” is Gods Law, common law (our Constitution), and then human law.  Human law is judged by juries in relation to God’s law and common law.

No government, agency, or individual can make up authority that was not given to it by the Constitution.  The federal jurisdiction only extends to the federal zone—that is, the District of Columbia and other small areas.  See jurisdiction video below and the link here.

The most powerful tools we have include the following:

Our votes as petit and grand jurors.  Juries have the right to judge the law, not just the facts of the case.  If the federal government wants to seize the Bundy Ranch, it can only do so with permission and through proper compensation.  It cannot use any federal law, such as the endangered species act, as an excuse to seize property.

  • BLM agents and agency heads should be brought to court and be subject to a trial by jury, or grand jury, which will judge whether their actions were lawful. 
  • Senator Harry Reid should be recalled and individual financial transactions scrutinized  in a court of law by a jury
  • Clark County Commissioners should be recalled or impeached for breaking their oath of office
  • The Sheriff should be recalled and/or impeached for breaking his oath of office

Don’t be a rubber stamp people!  The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, which means knowing your responsibilities as a juror.  Because we have let this system go, and in part because our lawyers, judges, and government have ignored it, the government is now acting beyond its constitutional authority.

Tenth Amendment.  It is time to use this tool to nullify bad law, to eliminate land and water grabs by the alphabet agencies.  State legislatures should continue to nullify egregious laws and consider actions that restrict, inhibit, and condition federal agencies and their actions within states.  Bad law can be nullified and/or tried in a court of law.

First and Second Amendments.  These are our RIGHTS to petition the government and to protect our liberty.

American Responsibility.  Remember, it is our duty as Americans to rise up against tyranny.  The Declaration of Independence requires it and enshrines us with a revolutionary right; our obedience to God requires our resistance to tyranny

Taxation.  Our revolution in 1776 began with a tax revolt—no taxation without representation!  Today, its seems that our motto should be not only no taxation without representation, but no taxation without authority!  There is massive action needed in this arena as it is still too easy for the government to pick off individuals.  Do not be a rubber stamp on a jury, and do not let tyranny take over!

No, we don’t need a constitutional convention.  We need to exercise the God-given rights we already have!

 

 

Open thread!

 

 

Freedom, Wealth Creation, and Virtue

©2014 drkate

An excellent discussion by the Virtual Presidency of  Bill Whittle, on re-branding Conservatism.

Hint: its not pepsi.

Winning by not playing in their sandbox.

Open Thread!

Obama Disabilities and the 25th Amendment

©2013 drkate

Gun Runner

Gun Runner

Long before the current manifestations of Obama’s incompetence, debauchery, and danger to America, this blog and a few others pointed out that under the 25th Amendment, Obama is disabled and therefore unable to serve in office.  His principle form of disability in the first instance was, and remains, his ineligibility to hold the office because he is not a natural born citizen.  Article II, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution requires that the President be born in the United States to two parents who are American citizens.

Obama set the stage for deceit by sponsoring a non-binding resolution (S.R. 535) that proclaimed John McCain eligible for the presidency even though McCain was not eligible because he was born off-base in a civilian hospital in Cologne, Panama.  McCain could not challenge Obama’s eligibility as he himself was ineligible.  And through voter fraud in 2008, the bought media, and the relentless use of race and gender to divide America, Obama coasted through the 12th Amendment procedure in the joint session of Congress to declare himself the pResident.  Not a whimper was heard from any of the so-called constitutionalists or conservatives, and every member of the Senate and House and every Secretary of State of the 50 States refused to do their duty and verify Obama’s eligibility.

Oh, yeah, I forgot…they all said “it wasn’t my job”…

We  all know that we were betrayed by the bench–the judiciary and the high powered attorneys–who twisted and made up reasons why the Constitution would not be followed.  American citizens spent thousands of dollars, risked their lives and livelihoods, were murdered, and were thrown in federal prison for daring to point out this most fundamental disability of the man who calls himself “Barack Hussein Obama”.

The failure of the judiciary and the unlawful lawmakers to follow the Constitution did not deter the investigations of Obama’s disability one iota.  Now we know that:

  • Obama’s birth certificate–produced on the White House website–is a 100% forgery
  • Obama’s Selective Service Registration is also 100% fraudulent
  • There is no evidence that he actually attended Columbia University
  • His real name is Barry Soetoro, and that he lost his law license because he failed to disclose his other names
  • Obama is a muslim and has lied about it consistently
  • Obama is at best a dual citizen (Britain, Indonesia) and never declared U.S. citizenship
  • ….

Yes it is possible to name more than a dozen characteristics of Obama that disable him from serving in any capacity of the federal government.  The penalty for selective service fraud alone is the inability to serve in the executive branch of government.  We know nothing about this guy who claims to be pResident…except that he is a tool of someone else.  He was the ultimate Trojan Candidate, and someone admitted the Trojan Horse.  His skin color and the enabling network became the condom shield through which he began immediately to screw America by fundamentally transforming the greatest country in the world.

Delusions, Narcissism, and Mental Illness

self-worship

self-worship

Never having worked a day in his life, the boy wonder began to fiddle while the world burned.  He has shown delight in an agenda that eviscerates our military and that degrades conservatives, and loves to participate in drone killing of women and children.  He has no problem invading other countries, threatening them, letting Americans die, and creating chaos at home and abroad.  He spends money recklessly to flaunt it in America’s face as we continue to spiral economically out of control.  Author John DeMayo notes:

Had a young Barry Soetoro been taught humility—instead of foolish pride—the boy who became King would have known better than to assume all his days would be full of accolades. Then again, maybe he is not capable of knowing the difference.
The serial lying and fraud goes beyond the observed diagnosis of narcissism, it is now bordering on the real possibility that Barack Obama is mentally ill.  Barack Obama is a failure, and now his signature death of America legislation–Obamacare just highlights his total incompetence and yes, continued disability to serve in the office he now occupies.  DeMayo again:
...Obama has never had to face failure in his life. Adversity perhaps, but not failure. President Obama has spent his life running away from his failures by seeking temporary and risky pleasures that fed his fragile ego and gratified his desire to be happy: Exotic travel, drugs, homosexual encounters, Islam. All collide with common man causes and a playboy appetite; all disturbing and conflicted excesses; all difficult for anyone to make sense of..
DeMayo believes Obama is a high-function mentally ill persona who is starting to show himself as all of his failures come forward:
…the high functioning mentally ill, live out on a constant limb, running between depression and excess to an occasional stop on a splintered branch called anxiety. A paramount fear of abandonment guides them to execute direct attacks against the things they wish to preserve and keep most. They are prolific liars and masterful agitators.
fuckerobamaNow, with democrats publicly turning on him, Obama is frightened and angry, and now more dangerous than ever.  He will seek to destroy anyone who disagrees with him before he can move on.  A good example is his purge of military leadership—over 200 officers who have counseled him to drop his war plans for Syria, to stop supporting terrorism and the Muslim Brotherhood, and who question everything from his rules of engagement (aka the tie one hand behind our soldiers back plan) to the betrayal at Benghazi.
The problem is, each day that goes on he becomes more dangerous:
Each day this man is allowed to continue to re-invent the laws designed to restrict his behavior, America becomes more dangerous; weaker and more divided. Each day Obama is disappointed becomes another day he attacks those that continue to hold our nation together, even if they are on his team.
Impeachment, Arrest, or the 25th Amendment?
Which brings me back to the 25th Amendment.  Because Congress has been incapacitated–with the National Security Agency probably having every one of them compromised–we can neither expect impeachment or arrest.  The conditions that invoke the 25th Amendment are no less challenging: either the President or a majority of his cabinet must move to replace him. Sections 3 and 4 of the 25th Amendment read:

Section 3.

Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

Section 4.

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

If the Vice President or any of Obama’s cabinet members expect to have any political future that does not include the gallows or a firing squad–for violating their oath of office and participating in treason against these United States– they might want to think about saving their own faces through this action.  If the republicans or democrats in Congress expect to have a future free of constant shame for having enabled this usurper to ruin America, they might want to save face by moving to remove Obama because he is unable to serve as President.
No, we constitutionalists, patriots and Americans are not going to forget what the political class has done to the once great America, but they can start correcting the error now.  Their final judgment is before God–whether they believe or not–and their destination is the eternal lake of fire.
7.21.08 Blitt Obama.indd

Questions for a Constitutional Convention

©2013 drkate

Of all the so called ‘Patriot Actions’ the one that is most disturbing to me is the call for a Constitutional Convention.  Over the last several years many have proposed new amendments to the Constitution, including some of the major provisions such as the qualifications for the office of the president, and other amendments that require Congress to follow the same rules as citizens of the United States and a balanced budget amendment.

What we don’t hear, even from the patriots, is the need to eliminate illegal amendments–those not ratified properly by the states– such as the 14th, 16th, and 17th amendments.  Nor do we hear calls for the restoration of the original 13th Amendment, which would have prevented lawyers (titles of nobility such as ‘esquire) to serve in government.  And of course, nobody talks about enforcing the existing constitution, which for example would eliminate the need for a ‘balanced budget amendment’ because Congress would have to stay within its enumerated powers.

So the lawyers and lobbyists across the country are pushing for a Constitutional Convention, glaringly a ‘con’ as in ‘con con’.  Remember this is the same group of people who were barred from serving in government by the original 13th amendment, which ‘disappeared’ from the Constitution  after the war of 1812.  The British burned the White House and the effort was to eliminate the records, research, and proceedings that produced the Declaration of Independence and the first Constitutional Convention which produced the Constitution for the United States.

The lawyers and legal profession, and its gaggle of judges, would go on to essentially ‘gut’ the Constitution’s provisions by developing the Administrative Procedures Act  (APA) and other “legal tools” to prevent we the people from even knowing the strength of the Constitution’s provisions and the protection of our  God-given rights enshrined therein.   The APA essentially makes it impossible to gut excessive agency development, for example, the EPA, and allows a suit only on the grounds that it violates the APA, not the Constitution’s limits on executive power. If the lawyers were barred initially from serving in the government, what are they doing now rewriting the constitution?

What will Disappear in the New Constitution? 

Photo of Ayers taken on September 11, 2001

Photo of Ayers taken on September 11, 2001

You can believe that our founding on God’s law–common law–will be eliminated.  This is the dream of all the marxist dems and all the republicans, now clearly just one part of the cabal that dislikes the American people and disrespects our founding documents, calls our founding fathers ‘terrorists’, and claims that our constitution is fatally flawed.  This propaganda has been spread to the general population through government schools (Common Core, anyone?), and now through our churches which have completed the ‘falling away’ as  2 Thessalonians 2:3 predicted.  And here we have Pastors saying that the American people do not deserve liberty anymore.  We can point fingers at everyone else as to who is responsible for this debacle, but when you point one finger at anyone three point back at you.

If our founding principles disappear, then all we have is a counterfeit.  That suits satan’s purposes just fine.  As long as we don’t remember God, or Jesus the Christ, our the founding principles of common law within the ten commandments, then confusion and lies will reign.  That’s the plan.

Questions for a Constitutional Convention

Is a Constitutional Convention an appropriate tool to renew the foundations of liberty in America?  Here are some questions for consideration that will help you decide!

  1. What will a Constitutional Convention cover?  What rules will limit the scope and coverage of a Constitutional Convention?
  2. How are the delegates to the Constitutional Convention selected?  Who selects them?
  3. What choice do ‘we the people’ have in selecting Convention Delegates and what assurance do the people have that these delegates will be truly representative of the people?
  4. Why are Constitutional Convention proponents mostly lawyers?
  5. Do people know that a Constitutional Convention has as much power as a joint session of Congress?
  6. Will the Constitutional Convention rewrite the constitution?
  7. How can we prevent the Constitutional Convention from rewriting the Constitution?
  8. It is known that the Obama regime has already drafted a new Constitution, its ready to go.  What will prevent Obama’s constitution from replacing our constitution?
  9. The original 13th Amendment prohibited lawyers (anyone who took a title such as “Esquire”) from serving in government.  Why is it that mostly lawyers are promoting a Constitutional Convention, and shouldn’t they be barred from participating?
  10. What provisions, or where is the law, that provides for a state to rescind its call for a Constitutional Convention?
  11. Will a Constitutional Convention be able to rescind or remove the 14th, 16th, and 17th Amendments, which were not properly ratified by the States?
  12. The Constitution is based on Common Law.  The lawyers have corrupted this and believe the Constitution is ‘case law’.  Will the Constitutional Convention return us to Common Law?
  13. Most attorneys ignored Article II of the constitution  which confirms that Obama is not constitutionally eligible to serve as president, saying it was  ‘a matter of interpretation’.  Who are they to now rewrite the Constitution?
  14. How can a constitutional convention defeat the liberal agenda when the call to revise the constitution is a call from the left, liberal, lawyers???

What is going on in your part of the country on a Constitutional Convention?  Where do citizens, legislators, Pastors, and attorneys stand on this issue in your state?

Statesmen, Politicians, and Cowards

©2013 drkate

For we wrestle against not flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. ~Ephesians 6:12 KJV

A story of our day.

babylonThey love their paycheck more than their solemn duty to uphold either their State’s or the United States Constitution.  They covet playing with the ‘big boys and girls’…a position in the false federal government god, full-time employment, political appointments with no accountability.  They crave power over.

These are the 99% of the men and women who occupy the majority of our local, regional, state, and federal governments and all political parties…calling themselves ‘leaders’ and ‘lawmakers’ when they are neither.  Having no convictions, they have no courage.  It is the ultimate of cowardice to choose themselves and political party over those they are supposed to represent.

They are the tares that grow with the wheat, and they are sewn into the field by the enemy.  When the time comes, they will be harvested and bundled, and thrown into the lake of fire.  By their own actions, and through our discernment, these politicians and cowards continue to be exposed, so that none will be left standing or go untarnished in their day.

Woe to them that believe they have fooled the masses!  Every statement, back door deal, public comment, and public meeting now completely exposes their fig leafs; they are not man or woman enough to stand for the truth.  They are the fools.

It is easy now to separate the wheat from the tares:

  1. A Statesman loves the Constitution.
  2. A Statesman enforces the Constitution.
  3. A Statesman uses truth to keep power in the hands of the people.
  4. A Statesman‘s primary concern is to secure freedom for future generations.
  5. A Statesman will not play politics with the people’s money.
  6. A Statesman knows the people must control government.
  7. A Statesman knows the people must limit government’s power to tax.
  8. A Statesman gives his allegiance to the people and country.
  9. A Statesman will demand a balanced budget.
  10. A Statesman will cause peace.

The politicians and cowards believe and act in the opposite manner than statesmen.

Promises are nothing; action says all.

Open Thread!

Freeing Generations of Americans

©2013 drkate

The Virtual Inaugural Address, 2013

My first reaction of course is to ask Mr. Whittle if he would run for president.

And then I remember: they kill all our leaders. And why are we pretending that elections are going to make any difference?  With ‘friends’ like the two Johns Boehner and McCain, who needs any more enemies?

A first step for me is to withdraw my energies from this regime and all of its infected parts.  They will not occupy my brain or sap my energy.  Living well is your best revenge.  Part of that living is to practice freeing generations of Americans from this mental slavery.  It is an affirmative duty for all true Americans.

Now scoundrels, go from us in peace…before you are forced to leave in shame.

Open Thread.

What Difference did She Make?

©2013 drkate

Is the world a safer place?  Or are more American arms falling into the hands of terrorists?

Benghazi. Benghazi. Benghazi. Benghazi.

Name one thing this Secretary of State did for America…

Open Thread.

Consequences of Presidential Ineligibility

©2012 drkate

For all you flat earth ineligibility deniers, here are the consequences of your foolish behavior protecting this foreigner in the White House.  Got blood on your hands, boys and girls?

From the Article II Superpac


On election day, vote for the Constitutionally Eligible candidate!

Who’s Constitutionally Eligible?

Learning who is and is not constitutionally qualified to be a presidential candidate should be as easy as reciting the alphabet, counting to ten or learning to tie your shoe laces. There are only three job requirements

  1. Must be 35 years or older;
  2. Held residency in the US for 14 years prior to nomination; and
  3. Must be a natural born citizen.

We already know Republican candidate Mitt Romney meets Article II requirements (see http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/ancestry-ahnentafel-genealogy-chart-for-mitt-romney-by-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret/) and of course, four years later we still don’t know if Mr. Obama is a natural born Citizen. But what about the top four Third Party candidates?

We teamed up with Cmdr. Charles Kerchner (Ret.), a 25+ year geneaology expert, to learn if these other candidates met Article II requirements. We quickly learned that two out of four of these third party candidates are constitutionally qualified. The remaining two remain unknown.

Here is what we learned -

ROCKY ANDERSON – JUSTICE PARTY
35 years of age Yes, born September 9, 1951
14 year residency Yes, Prior to his serving as Mayor of Salt Lake City for two terms he was a practicing attorney for 21 years in the area.
Natural born citizen Yes, He was born in Logan, Utah to Roy and Grace Anderson both American citizens (see 1940 census)
VIRGIL GOODE – CONSTITUTIONAL PARTY
35 years of age Yes, born October 17, 1946
14 year residency Yes,He served in the Virginia State Legislature and then Congress between 1997 – 2009 and then practiced law in his hometown of Rocky Mount, Virginia.
Natural born citizen Yes. He was born in Richmond, Virginia to Alice Clara (nee Besecker) and Virgil Hamlin Goode both American citizens (see 1940 census)
GARY JOHNSON – LIBERTARIAN PARTY
35 years of age Yes. Johnson was born January 1, 1953
14 year residency Yes. Johnson served as Governor of New Mexico between 1995 – 2002 and in 2009 launched a non-profit titled “Our America Initiative”
Natural born citizen Unknown. Johnson was born in Minot, North Dakota to Lorraine B. (nee Bestow) and Earl W. Johnson. According to the 1920 census Earl Johnson was adopted therefore his son, Gary’s citizenship status is unknown (http://2012.presidential-candidates.org/Johnson/Parents-Grandparents.php)
Jill Stein – Green Party
35 years of age Yes. Stein was born May 14, 1951
14 year residency Yes. Stein launched her political career in 1998 by serving on  various health related nonprofit boards in Boston, Mass. Stein then began in earnest to build her political resume in 2002 by first running for Governor, then House of Representatives (2004) and finally the Secretary of the Commonwealth (2006) in Massachusetts. She won election to serve as a Town Representative on the Lexington, Massachusetts Town Board serving between 2005 -2008 before running for Governor again in 2010 and President in 2012.
Natural born citizen Unknown. Stein does not provide any information in any of her bio’s about who her parents are. She tells us she was born in Chicago, Illinois. The only biographical information found is from interviews conducted by Forbes magazine tax writer Peter J. Reilly who refers to her biographical details as “thin.” Click HERE to read Reilly’s interview and HERE to watch Stein tell his audience who her grandparents were but nothing about her own familial situation.

Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency

©2012 drkate

Abdul Karim Hassan is a naturalized citizen who wishes to run for the Presidency of the United States. This even though the Constitution says “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Hassan v Scott Gessler,  Colorado SoS

Business Insider reported on September 5, 2012, Abdul Karim Hassan’s series of lawsuits claiming his right to run for the Presidency have been denied in the Second, Third, and now Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.  A similar ruling was issued September 28, 2012 for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

The significance of these rulings cannot be underestimated as they affirm that the natural born citizen clause of Article II of the U.S. Constitution has not been trumped, abrogated, or implicitly repealed by the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment nor the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  These arguments are the same ones used by Obama’s lawyers in fending off the legitimate challenges to Barack Obama’s candidacy and presidency; by the secretaries of state to refute ballot challenges, and by the media, pundits, Congress and the academics to cover up the usurpation of the presidency by Obama/Soetoro.  Of course, the corrupt SCOTUS hears nothing, sees nothing, and says nothing.

Obama and his supporters, the Congressional eligibility deniers, and the media have been soundly defeated and Obama is still ineligible to hold or run for the office he seeks.  What is more interesting is that the legal rulings lend support to the charges of misprision of felony that all members of Congress, and all the secretaries of state face in contributing to the overthrow of the White House.

This article briefly reviews the history of this case and its rulings.

The FEC Filing 

Presidential Candidate Abdul Hassan ruled ineligible as he is not a natural born citizen

Hassan, a Guyana-born naturalized American citizen, filed papers with the Federal Election Commission to run for the presidency.  Astoundingly, the FEC ruled in September 2011 that Hassan could file papers and raise money to run for president of the United States:

But the agency also told the prospective candidate, Abdul Hassan, that his campaign may not receive federal matching funds because he was not born in America. However, the agency’s decision stopped short of addressing the constitutional issue of whether someone born outside the United States can be president.

Importantly, the FEC made clear that it was outside it’s jurisdiction to decide the constitutional merits of Mr. Hassan’s candidacy, saying that vetting was up to the States:

“This does not mean that he can go and say ‘look the FEC has said that I am a candidate, give me money, I’m official,’” said Republican Commissioner Donald McGahn. “That is not what we do here; we don’t certify you as a candidate. That’s what the states do.” (emphasis added)

Democratic FEC Commissioners had ‘trepidation’ in issuing this unanimous opinion because of how it might be perceived.  They attempted to qualify and explain their rationale:

“By saying that it is okay — it does give the impression that we don’t see a problem,” said Democratic Commissioner Steven Walther. “I think that we really need to be cognizant of how this could be misconstrued.”

To address this problem, one of the final sections added to approved opinion states:

“Notwithstanding this conclusion, the Commission expresses no opinion on Mr. Hassan’s potential liability arising out of his proposed activities under any other Federal or State law, including any laws concerning fraudulent misrepresentation. Any such issues are outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.”

“For us this is really all about what we are empowered to decide and what we are not empowered to decide,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “Nobody is saying that it is fine and nobody is saying it’s okay for this guy to be going out and raising funds.’

Ballot Access Denied in Colorado, New Hampshire

Hassan then proceeded to set up a website and attempted to get on the ballot in New Hampshire and Colorado.  When denied access by both Secretaries of State of each state, he sued.  He has filed five lawsuits which argued that:

… the Constitution’s natural-born-citizen requirement is a vestige of our less noble past, before we decided that discrimination based on national origin is a grievous wrong. (He points in his briefs to Dred Scott v. Sandford.)The lawsuits say the Constitution’s admonition that “[n]o person  except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Hassan’s lawsuits have already been denied in the First and Second U.S. court of appeals. And the Tenth Circuit rounded out the trio on Tuesday when it too shut down Hassan’s case.

Complaint Against the FEC’s Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act

Hassan initiated other lawsuits aimed at the natural born citizen requirement based on these assumptions, and filed against the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act  (26 U.S.C. §§ 9001-9013) which provides public funding to Presidential nominees of major or minor political parties after the FEC issued an advisory opinion that Hassan did not qualify for any matching funding because he was not a natural born citizen.  Hassan argues that the Presidential Campaign Fund Act is:

(1) unconstitutional and invalid, and (2) the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution1 is irreconcilable with, and has been“trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Now this is where it gets interesting.  The FEC as defendant submitted a motion to dismiss the case based on the same premises that have been used to try to defeat challenges to Obama’s eligibility.  That is,

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (emphasis added)

The FEC also argued that Defendant argued that this Court should deny Plaintiff’s Application because

the Complaint fails to present an Article III case or controversy, and alternatively, because it does not present a substantial constitutional question. (emphasis added)

The government moved to dismiss the case–using the same arguments it has used to dismiss other cases against Obama–(1) failure to present a claim upon which relief can be granted, (2) lack of jurisdiction, (3) failing to present an Article III case or controversy, and (4) failure to present a substantial constitutional question.

The one argument missing from the government’s defense?  STANDING.

American Jurisprudence and Constitutional Legal Thinking

The DC circuit court dismissed Abdul Hassan’s case. The judge’s ruling denying Abdul Hassans suit against the FEC is illustrative for the process the Judge followed in making its conclusions.  As opposed to ducking jurisdiction and ducking its Article III responsibility to hear cases involving constitutional questions, the court determined:

Because subject matter jurisdiction focuses on the court’s power to hear the claim, however, the court must give the plaintiff’s factual allegations closer scrutiny when resolving a Rule 12(b)(1) motion than would be required for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Thus, to determine whether it has jurisdiction over a claim, the court may consider materials outside the pleadings where necessary to resolve disputed jurisdictional facts. Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C. Cir. 1992). (emphasis added)

Regarding FRCP Rule 12 (b), the court determined:

A court need not, however, “accept inferences drawn by plaintiffs if such inferences are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint. Nor must the court accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.” Id. In addition,“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” (emphasis added)

In other words, the Court actually took on the issue, was legally entitled to review additional information, and ruled it did not have to accept inferences or ‘legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations’.  Every one of the Obama challenge cases was thrown out first, on standing, and second, using the measly excuses such as failure to present a case, lack of Article III jurisdiction, or the ‘political question’.

Article II Still Stands

I hope everyone who has been involved in the eligibility movement can appreciate the significance of these rulings for the Constitution, the requirements of the Presidency, and all the work we have accomplished over the last several years.  It is critical to inform your friends who are skeptical of the ‘birthers’ or disappointed in the perceived failure of the 100+ cases challenging Obama that several courts have affirmed the natural born citizen requirement of the presidency–that it still stands, and that we are right and always have been on this issue.

Significantly the FEC believes the States are responsible for the determination of eligibility, just as the Article II Superpac, the Obama Ballot Challenge, the extensive legal work of many scholars, and manymany others have indicated.  The 2009 Continental Congress recommended vetting laws at the state level were required, and the Article II Superpac will continue its efforts after this election and into 2013 to ensure a vetting process is in place at multiple levels, to make sure the usurpation of the White House by an unknown, unvetted foreign national never happens again.

Please donate to the Article II Superpac to ensure its efforts continue through and beyond the 2012 election.  The national security of our Nation is at stake.

Voices Without a Vote

h/t Article II Superpac, Obama Release Your Records 

Voices Without A Vote” is a short ad featuring the generation of kids who will be inheriting the Obama mess in years to come. It is very well done with a powerful message any and all should hear prior to November 6. It’s already been viewed by 300,785 people. Let’s help it get to a million by passing it onto our networks.

On January 5, 2012, Dean Haskins, Director of the former Birther Summit, wrote an article titled “Update on New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Virginia Sunahara’s Brother, Duncan Sunahara.” This week Article II Super PAC ran an ad in the Washington Times Weekly and Daily to draw people’s attention to Hawaii’s Deputy Attorney General, Jill Nagamine, using, some suggest abusing, her power by blocking the Sunahara family from securing baby Virginia’s original Hawai’ian long-form birth certificate and by extension ALL Hawai’an’s original birth records. Why the State of Hawaii is fighting this extremely simple request spending thousands of taxpayer’s funds is beyond our ability to even make a guess. Rather, we find it disturbing that the brother of a baby who died over 50 years ago can’t secure her original birth certificate. Think about that…hhhmmm….50 years ago.

If you missed Monday’s Tea Party Power Hour radio show be sure to check out the podcast by clicking http://www.art2superpac.com/radioshow.html . Monday’s guest was Paul Kengor, Ph.D. author of “The Communist – Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor”

FULL ARTICLE II SUPER PAC UPDATE HERE

**Help the Article II Superpac get these ads into newspapers in the swing states and in front of the electoral college**

Donate Donate Donate Donate

DNC Takes Off Without Obama

©2012 drkate

As the DNC takes off without Obama, the empty chair

Article II activists are busy letting everyone know that the Democrats have a problem, and so will every secretary of state if they certify Obama as eligible to be placed on their state’s ballot. Misprision of Felony is in everyone’s future, notwithstanding the poor job the judiciary did in ‘protecting’ Obama by violating the law.

The Article II SuperPac sent its CPD letter out early this week, followed by another terrific full page ad in the Washington Times. Meanwhile, attorney Larry Klayman sent a letter to Bob Bauer–Obama’s forger in chief–warning him of certifying Obama as eligible when there is no proof that he is…suggesting that charges of election fraud are forthcoming. And the Patriot’s Union has a great initiative underway that everyone can participate in…

And while you’re at it letting everyone know about Obama’s Achilles Heel, take a moment to caption this photo!

Open thread!  :smile:

Constitutional Heroes to Gather in Phoenix

©2012 drkate

The Greater Phoenix Tea Party Patriots will be hosting a gathering in Phoenix on September 22 with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, former Lt. Col. Dr. Terry Lakin, and singer/songwriter/Patriot Pat Boone.  Other speakers include Investigator Mike Zullo, filmaker Bettina Viviano, and author Tom Ballantyne.

The event will be held at the Celebrity Theater and tickets may be purchased directly from the Theater.  The event will be held from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

View the event at the Terry Lakin Action Fund, and please click here to download a printable flyer to pass around.

This post asks for your help in fundraising for this event by purchasing tickets whether or not you are able to come.  Several Tea Party Patriots have purchased tickets for the Arizona Congressional Delegation, including Senators John McCain and Kyle, as well as candidates running for office.  Many of you have heard these politicians’ less than honest answers regarding Obama’s constitutional eligibility, and well, McCain threw the election to Obama anyway.  But your Senators and Representatives should be aware of this event!

SUPPORT SHERIFF JOE AND HIS CALL FOR CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION OF FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS

By the way, Terry Lakin’s book “Officer’s Oath” is an extremely interesting personal story of the sacrifices made in defense of our Constitution by Dr. Terry Lakin.  It is a must read for every Patriot who wants to know how a real military Officer behaves.

 

Open Thread!

The Petty Tyrant

©2012 drkate

No wonder Obama is mad at middle America.  Everything we have was earned with hard work, taking risks, failing, and starting over again. On the contrary, Obama hasn’t earned anything; what he has is undeserved and he is not man enough to admit it.

Bill Whittle nails it:

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.~ T. Roosevelt, 1910

Obama was never in the arena, never in the ring.  For that he is jealous of Americans and America.  His petty tyrant games are designed to punish America for her successes.

Crime of the Century

©2012 drkate

The crime of the century has been committed on our watch, though it has its roots in the 20th century scoundrels that destroyed the U.S. dollar, enslaved and dumb-downed citizens through ‘government schools, and terrorized generations with war, terrorist attacks, economic depressions, poverty, and disease.

The stunning end result of 20th Century madness is the usurpation of the White House by the foreigner Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro, in my view, a clear act of war against the United States.

From the Washington Times July 30 edition, the Article II SuperPac placed this stunning ad:

Congress’ fingerprints at the White House crime scene
The facts are in. We know, definitively, that the alleged Obama
birth certificate on the White House Website is fraudulent.
Congress must admit their culpability in this. They faced a
Presidential candidate with credentials based almost entirely
on two autobiographies full of composite characters, errors,
and outright fiction. Rather than step up and do their job, the
Democrat-controlled Congress failed to properly vet their
candidate’s fairytale narrative. Now the chickens have come
home to roost and Congress is desperately evading the issue
while trying to sustain the illusion of themselves as defenders
of the Constitution.

The shock of this usurpation turned to the finality of Congress’ participation in the cover up and to the useless, unconstitutional judiciary heeding instructions to ignore the constitution.  Yet the judiciary in particular is that crowd of  20th century lawyers who went to the ‘finest’ law schools that served only to undermine, avoid, diminish, and ridicule the constitution in favor of ‘case law’, made-up opinions with little or no founding in the principles of Constitutional law.  The death of Lady Liberty, brought to you by the politicians that scammed your vote while stabbing you in the back, all the time pretending to be defenders of the Constitution.

Representative Peter King shows us how:

And Commander Charles Kerchner reminds us how those two newspaper announcements prove absolutely nothing:

It is time for this charade to end, and for the pure truth to be revealed.  Do your constitutional duty and demand a full Congressional investigation…do not let them think we have ‘given up’.

Lock him out, lock him up

Open thread on the usurper, his crimes and cronies.

Killing to Win–Update

©2012 drkate

Update:  Who is the Colorado shooter?

A government operation?

 

The only thing shocking in this, is Janet Napolitano and the host of Obama psycho creators expected more of these “too much reality” delusional orbs to be acting out, and they have not. Tavistock and flouride have kept the lid on, even if Obama was viewing the American Tea Party as this Joker group and why ABC and the media have been given talking points to point all in that Sarah Palin direction. The Tea Party people though have God as their anchor point, while the Obama voters drift with his messiah, and the filtered few James Holmes just prey on others in small quantity.~ Lame Cherry

The liar

There should be no doubt in anyone’s mind right now that the cabal-backed Obama regime will stop at nothing to win the 2012 election.  The deliberate murder of innocent Americans is just part of the plan and is only masked by the way in which it is accomplished.  Whether its from deliberately poisoning the Gulf of Mexico, “breitbarting” dozens of individuals, letting terrorists into the United States to bomb airplanes or Times Square, sending our soldiers into kill zones with bean bags as weapons, shooting up people in a grocery store parking lot or a theater,  or allowing guns to walk to Mexico and back.  This is a murderous regime that doesn’t even pretend to hide it any more.

Try to wrap your arms around this America:  Americans are expendable, collateral damage, useless chattel to be herded into a corner and enslaved, jailed, shot, poisoned, or blown up.  For the boys like Obama, Holder, Jarrett, and Naps Napolitano, the ends justify all means.  And the end they seek is the end of America—a fundamental change where hope and change masked the intent to bind us in rope and chains.

While not excusing previous administrations of their false flag events, Obama’s murder false flag record is growing:

  • The Gulf of Mexico oil disaster
  • Airplane crash that killed the entire Polish government
  • Ft. Hood shooting
  • Giffords shooting in Arizona
  • The Occupy Wall Street movement
  • Bin Ladin’s re-killing
  • Deliberate flooding of the Missouri River in 2011
  • Assassination of mideast leaders, including the recent assassination of top officials in Syria’s government
  • Assassination of Andrew Breitbart
  • Fast & Furious
  • Drone porn
  • The Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting
  • etc., etc., etc.–a chilling display of  murder

That Eric Holder is Obama’s right hand conspirator in this effort is in perfect sync with Holder’s  involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing, the first WTC bombing, Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the Elian Gonzales fiasco.  None of this is by accident.  Beginning with the usurpation of the Presidency, the foreigner in the White House is actively waging war against Americans.  Stepping on the bodies of Americans is the only way he can lift his sorry ass.

Invariably, each of these false flags is designed to divert attention from one of two things:  (1) the destruction of the Constitution (free markets, free speech, 2nd Amendment), or (2) his birth narrative and foreign origin.  Does anyone think it just coincidental that the shooting in Colorado happened four days after Sheriff Arpaio’s latest press conference, where Obama’s so-called birth certificate was exposed as a definite forgery  or just a few days after the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration of the U.S. Government was exposed?

Obama will make a personal inspection of the scene visit to Colorado to renew his call for destruction of the Second Amendment pay his respects to the victims.  This is like his drone porn–he has to go to the scene of a murder with blood dripping from his teeth and hands… something he is glad to see.  Watch his expression at the scene or when he speaks–it will be cold,calculating and without compassion.  Never let a good crisis go to waste.

The Colorado Shooting: Who Paid for the $20,000 in Military-Grade Equipment?

It is very likely that the Colorado shooting was a false flag event…and by discussing it as such does not diminish the tragedy of the losses suffered there.

While the cabal was expecting most Americans to go into a period of  grief counseling for those who lost their lives on July 20, some took a look at the suspicious reports immediately surfacing from the tragedy which indicates this was most likely a staged event.

  • First, we have the set-up or planting the idea.
  • Then, in an area usually crawling with police, there were none there in the area (h/t Tenacity)
  • Next we have the stories that he was a loner and this was ‘out of character’
  • But there was a witness, and it looks like he had accomplices
  • How did a poor Ph.D. student who had trouble finding work get $20,000 dollars of military-grade equipment, including guns, tear gas, gas masks, body armor, and sophisticated devices to booby-trap his apartment?
  • Was the shooter a part of the Black Bloc/Occupy Wall Street crowd?

“The Case for a Well-Armed Citizenry”

Why didn’t anyone go after the shooter in the theater?  Why didn’t anyone fight backAurora’s strict gun control laws  prevent the concealed carry of  weapons and provide strict registration requirements, but this did not prevent the shooter from legally buying guns and using them.

I cannot help but think, if one person in that audience was carrying a gun with them, that person could have saved lives. Unfortunately – despite what some of the Left have said – this tragedy is an example of the importance of our Second Amendment Rights.~CNS News

While Obama/Holder/Naps/Hillary will push for gun control, and the UN small arms treaty is up for HRC’s signature, the shooting in Colorado just reinforces the need for an armed citizenry.  History is replete with examples of the millions of people killed by their governments upon the confiscation of hand guns and passage of laws banning them.

Yes, concealed carry laws are about trust.  Law abiding citizens trust other law abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons responsibly.  And just as 71-year-old Samuel Williams did what he saw as his duty in the Ocala Internet Café, perhaps saving the lives and property of a dozen or more innocent victims, if he had been seated in the front row of the theater in Aurora, Colorado we might not be mourning so many deaths today.

Make no mistake–Obama will kill to win.

Lock him out, lock him up

The War on Conscience

©2012 drkate

Barack Obama knows that the way to defeat a people is to destroy their sense of right and wrong~Alan Keyes

Put on the whole armor of God–including the tool of discernment.  There are great  confusions and lying wonders about:

For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: (2 Thess 2: 7-12 KJV)

Open Thread

Open Letter to Joe Biden

©2012 drkate

Ever wonder who the real president  of the United States is right now?  Technically, its Joe Biden.

Obama is constitutionally unqualified for the presidency under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. At the end of the long process of voter fraud, voter intimidation, misinformation by the media, voting, vote theft, DNC fraud, and electoral college counts, the joint session of Congress assembled in early January 2009 to certify the electoral college votes.  Both the certification of the candidates and the call for objections to Obama’s eligibility that could have been raised on January 8, 2009 were not allowed/implemented/conducted  by then Vice President Cheney and/or Speaker Pelosi.

If Amendment Twelve would have been implemented– a legal, constitutional, and proper legislative action –Joe Biden would have been President and Sarah Palin Vice President.

Amendment Twelve says in part:

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be   counted…

In Kerchner v. Obama  et al –including Cheney and Pelosi, government lawyers argued that these duties under the 12th Amendment were ministerial and not ‘official'; yet they used the official status of Cheney and Pelosi as a shield to prevent legal action while performing ‘official duties’.

But the duties involving the constitutional certification of the President and Vice President are consequential, serious, and constitutional.  Thus, President of the Senate and VP Joe Biden, and Speaker John Boehner need to be reminded of their duties under their solemn oath of office and their Constitutional responsibilities when it comes to Amendment Twelve.

Open Letter to President Joe Biden:

Dear President Biden:

As you are undoubtedly aware by now, Mr. Obama is not constitutionally eligible to hold the presidency. This makes you the current legal president of the United States and Mr. Obama an unlawful occupant of your office.  Since no one has officially acknowledged this I will be the first to congratulate you, and probably the first to offer condolences for the lack of recognition of this fact.

Since you are operating as Vice President, you are simultaneously the President of the Senate.  In that role you have a number of awesome responsibilities, including the certification and counting of the Electoral College vote on January 9, 2013.  That task requires, historically and under Amendment Twelve, the certification that the president/vice president-elect meet the constitutional qualifications of the office.

You have always had it within your power to redress the situation of Congress’ failure to certify Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications.  Under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, you are able to recommend, with the majority of the cabinet, the removal of the President for a ‘disability‘ that makes him unable to fulfill the obligations of the office. As an officer of the United States, you should also know about Title 18 and the misprision of treason and felony statutes requiring the disclosure of activity that would be considered a crime under the laws of the United States.

During that day of January 2013, a number of objections to the certification of Barack Obama, if he is re-elected, are likely from several states, and will include representatives and senators. It is your constitutional duty to call for and hear those objections and ascertain the next steps. 

In 2009, your predecessor VP Dick Cheney refused to call for or hear any objections.  Speaker Pelosi ignored the requirement to certify constitutional eligibility contained in Amendment Twelve. 

However, unlike 2009, in 2013 millions of Americans are aware of the duty you have as President of the Senate, and as a sworn constitutional officer of the United States.  We will be watching and witnessing your actions that  significant day when your legacy, honor, office, and integrity will all be on the line.

Will history disdainfully conclude that you conspired to overthrow the United States by allowing and working with a constitutionally ineligible foreigner to usurp the office of the President?  Or will history glorify your action and integrity as the man who saved the Presidency?

Honor America, Mr. President. 

Well I am sure there are many improvements and better zingers possible with a letter to Biden. :lol:   I hope you use this one, or draft your own…we can work on many levels to exert influence on those who must be told what to do.

The next officials that I will target letters to are those senators and congressmen in each of the states where a ballot challenge or other legal actions have been undertaken.  In theory anyway, the Senators and Representatives are obligated to object on behalf of their constituents.

Ballot Challenges are Not Over

Remember the ballot challenges are not over;  some suggest that the precedent set by of all the cases trying to get at Obama’s eligibility led to specific legal timing of a challenge–which has to be after he’s nominated but before his name is placed on a ballot.  The window of time is very short and each state varies.  Find your state’s window for the challenge to the state’s General Election ballot.

Your thoughts?  After that, open thread! :smile:

A Warning to Republicans

©2012 drkate

There are more than enough factors to suggest that Republicans will lose handily to Obama in the upcoming presidential election.  Here are just a few:

  • Your choice of VP nominee.  You’ve got problems.  They are named Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Bobby Jindal.
  1. All signs point to the unconstitutional choice of Marco Rubio–once the darling of the tea party, now a traitor to the constitution for not immediately bowing out of the running due to his non-NBC status.  Marco’s parents were not US citizens when he was born.  If you nominate the ineligible Rubio, how different are you than the usurper Obama?  Rubio supports the NDAA, supports internet crackdowns aka privacy invasion and has been singularly unspectacular in his first two years as a senator. He needs experience and you republicans should stop trying to play the race card by putting in a cuban to get the hispanic vote or to take Florida.  We the people aren’t as stupid as you think.
  2. Jeb Bush.  You really want to ‘bush-whack’ the American people again? “W” lied about the war in Iraq, gave us TARP (the grand cover up of theft), and gave us torture, the Department of Homeland Security, and any number of nefarious and dubious Executive Orders expanding the powers of the president.  Daddy bush, the grand master behind it all, ushered in the NWO, the CIA (formerly the SS), was present at all the political assassinations in the last 30 years, and still controls the game.  Bush Sr and Romney are best buddies.  Who do you think chose Romney for 2012?
  3. Jindal.  His parents were not U.S. citizens when he was born, and he is not a natural born citizen.  What deal did he make with Obama on the Gulf BP oil spill?  How has he compromised his state to ‘get along’?
  • Sweeping Obama’s ineligibility and crimes under the rug.  Your spectacular, intentional failure to address Obama’s ineligibility makes you complicit in the crime.  I suppose you think that just by winning the office you can ‘make this go away’.  On the contrary, we the people will have every right to ignore and arrest you for violating your oath of office.  Any of you republican candidates who fail to address this issue are sealing your fate with millions of us…far better to continue our efforts against the usurper (and the rest of you) because he is fully and completely exposed.  With you chicken republicans, it will be swept under the rug and never be addressed.  Heck you will probably reach into the private sector and pardon Obama of his treason.  Which makes you treasonous.
  • Your position on the NDAA and Homeland Security.  How are we to believe anything you say about the constitution, small government, the rights of the people when you support draconian actions to gleefully kill Americans or detain them indefinately—are you listening John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Michelle Bachman, Mitt Romney?
  • Your failure to tell the truth about income taxes, the FED, and fiat currency. As we face the collapse of the dollar, you discuss play games with the democrats about who gets taxed and how much, swear the FED stabilizes the economy, and continue to deceive Americans who are now waking up, in large part due to Ron Paul’s truth telling.  Never will Gingrich, Santorum, Romney ever talk the truth.  They are willfully ignorant, in fact, taking great advantage of the system.
  • Your position on unconstitutional wars.  Yes, lets keep sending other people’s children to get their legs blown off, while you rape in the profits from the military-industrial complex, give America to the UN, and pound your fist in false righteousness.

How many actually believe Romney will win?  Clearly these guys don’t:

Better watch out. A Gideon strategy may come around and bite you in the butt.

Amendment 12 and January 9, 2013: The Last Line of Defense

©2012 drkate

Collectively, these actions, questions, investigations and research militate for and require the representatives and senators in each state where these actions have been undertaken to raise objections to the electoral college vote count on January 9, 2013.

This post will look far off into the future, and assumes for the moment that none of the legal and proper efforts Constitutionalists have undertaken since 2008 to have Barrack Obama Soetoro investigated and removed from office based on his lack of constitutional eligibility will have worked. We have created letter-writing campaigns, demonstrations, multiple lawsuits, ballot challenges, treason charges and trials, and citizen grand jury investigations.  History will record the efforts of American patriots to fight this injustice done to our country, and the world already knows of our efforts and knows that Obama is a usurper.  Obama has used tax dollars, drugs, weapons, or CIA threats to bribe Kenya, Indonesia, Pakistan, the muslim community, individual states, and so many others to keep silent about his illegality.  He is a legend–in name only–and history and God will judge all of those complicit as traitorous individuals not worthy of the spit on a street corner.

While we have been able to fully expose Obama/Soetoro and the network of criminals inside and outside of government who have enabled this usurpation, our efforts to have action taken on behalf of our Country and American citizens have been thwarted by the media, the judiciary, the Congress, law enforcement, the military, and the legion of insaneobots paid to harass Americans.  Assuming Obama and the democrats/republicans, in concert with the media will rig the 2012 presidential election and put Obama in the office again,  our last line of defense will be the counting and certification of the electoral college votes by a joint session of Congress on January 9, 2013.

Amendment 12:  Choosing the President

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;

The person having the greatest Number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.

The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

Appointment of the Electors.  States appoint the electors and the number of electors is based on the number of house and Senate seats in each state.  48 States and the District of Columbia “appoint” their Electors on a winner-take-all basis (that is, the presidential/vice-presidential ticket with the plurality of the Statewide vote [= most votes from the State] is intended to get all that jurisdiction’s Electors). In each of the two remaining States, Maine and Nebraska, the presidential/vice-presidential ticket that receives the plurality of the vote in each Congressional District is intended to get the vote of the 1 “district” Elector from that CD, while the presidential/vice-presidential ticket receiving the most votes Statewide is intended to get the votes of 2 “at-large” Electors from the State. The candidate that wins the popular vote in the other 48 states receives all of that state’s electoral college votesThis site describes the number of electoral votes in each state.

In most states, electoral college members are required to vote for the person who won the popular vote in the state, and in some cases there are financial and other penalties involved if one doesn’t follow that rule.  In 2008 there were attempts to file lawsuits at that point in time to prevent the vote for Obama, but the courts ruled that ‘the process had to be completed’ before any lawsuit on the merits could be filed (cough, cough).

Challenging the Vote in the Joint Session of Congress

The next point in time that we have to challenge the vote for Obama is on January 9, 2013, during a joint session of Congress to count the electoral college votes as specified in the Twelveth Amendment.

A few times in history this electoral vote counting was challenged by members of the House and Senate.  In 2000, while then VP Gore was presiding over the joint session of Congress, the vote was challenged by democrats, the black congressional caucus, and a few Senators based on the Florida recount debacle, where the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bush by taking away the State’s presumed jurisdiction over the vote count.  The objection was based on a possible fraudulent vote count.

In 2008, there were several reasons why the vote could have been challenged, including:

  • Obama’s lack of constitutional eligibility
  • The Democrat’s Rules and Bylaws theft of votes from HRC
  • Voter intimidation and caucus fraud
  • Illegal foreign campaign contributions
  • The insufficiency of Obama’s ballot access (forged signatures, for which Indiana democrats have recently been punished)
  • Voter machine tampering
  • Shutting down the Democrat’s convention without fully voting
  • Suspicious deaths of key HRC supporters

Former Speaker of the House of Lies

But no one challenged the electoral college vote, in fact I heard Nancy Pelosi was so drunk with power that she rushed the vote improperly, aided and abetted by VP Dick Cheney, without the requisite analysis of citizenship status or calling for objections.  All those who could have challenged this vote were too afraid to do so, and yes that includes Ron Paul.  They made a calculation that their paychecks and perks were more important than defending the Constitution from all enemies, domestic and foreign.

Every member of Congress, and every Senator on January 8, 2009, violated their oath of office and failed to protect America.  They will be held accountable in this lifetime, or clearly when they stand before their maker and try to explain away their treason.

The 2013 Scenario

As of this date, there have been millions of letters written to Congress, no less than 100 lawsuits that have never been heard on the merits, a dozen ballot challenges, a law enforcement investigation, citizen petitions to investigate, proven fraudulent ballot access in 2008 by Obama, proven voter intimidation, and public opinion polls that continue to demonstrate that most Americans do not believe Obama and want his status investigated.

Collectively, these actions, questions, investigations and research militate for and require the representatives and senators in each state where these actions have been undertaken to raise objections to the electoral college vote count on January 9, 2013.

The scoundrels known as our Senators and Congressmen, including the so-called ‘tea party favorites’, have one last chance to meet their oath of office, and of course, they want ‘cover’ for doing the right thing.  So here is, and hear, your cover, boys and girls:
  • Each state in which there has been a ballot challenge, petition, grand jury investigation, lawsuit, and letter writing campaign regarding Obama’s lack of eligibility needs to assemble a packet for each of their Congressmen and Senators requiring that they raise an objection to the electoral college count on January 9, 2013.  This effort must begin now, and make it clear that they will either be recalled, boycotted, or publically shamed if they fail to do so.  For new ‘tea party’ or other candidates (like John Dennis in California, trying to defeat Pelosi), pledges that they will raise an objection–regardless of the effect on their political career–must be secured, and if not, do not support them financially.  They only need to listen to their constituents to have enough ‘cover‘ reason to do so–it is the right thing to do.  We are talking New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Arizona, California, Florida, North Carolina, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Georgia, New York…to name a few.
  • Any state that can demonstrate voter fraud in 2012, including the caucuses, should require its congressional delegation to challenge the electoral college vote for their state
  • The State legislatures should be petitioned to send a directive to their congressional delegate to challenge the vote, based on the request of the public
  • A scientifically-sound poll should be commissioned in each state asking the direct question to the public whether they would support a challenge to the electoral college vote in 2013 if Obama is ‘re-elected’ to office.
  • Plans should be made to shut the Congress down in January–preventing their leaving their offices–until this issue is addressed.  Similar plans should be made for each congressional and senatorial office in each state.
  • A national strike should be considered in lieu of the Congress taking any action.

Remember that the Twelveth Amendment provides a legal, constitutional procedure to select the President and Vice President should the presidential candidate fail to meet the qualifications of the office.

Lock him out, lock him up

What don’t they want us to see?

©2012 drkate

The race card is a distraction.  And it looks like they’ve succeeded, again.

Cruising the internet in the last few days there are hundreds of articles on Trayvon Martin case, interracial violence, the history of racial relations in the United States,and the general level of violence existing in America.  This blog also took the time to discuss black-on-black violence.

If there was one article that knocked me back out of this focus on race, it was American Thinker’s article on Obama and the End of the Progressive Era, spurring conversations with friends reminding me of the distractions the left always provides to hide their true agenda.  While everyone is talking about the race card failing, and it being worn out, it actually has successfully diverted our attention again.

So what don’t they want us to focus on?

  • Sheriff Arpaio’s investigation of the illegality of Obama…the first law enforcement investigation to prove what we’ve known for a long time–that everything about Obama is fake.  The Arizona legislature is still holding up the eligibility bill, and our attention has been taken away from existing Arizona law (A.R.S. 16 311(B)) which requires Obama to submit a notarized form swearing he meets the qualifications of the office for which he is running…to wit, on December 13, 2007, Obama signed a form which falsely swore he was a natural born citizen.  Governor Jan Brewer was then the AZ Secretary of State.  The citizen petition that will bypass Governor Brewer has been signed by more than 1,000 people, and is headed to the Secretary of State and the AG, but the AG is now under criminal investigation.
  • Related to Obama’s lack of eligibility, several Indiana democrats were charged with voter fraud that occurred in 2008, where they forged hundreds of signatures to get Obama on the ballot.  Yes, the forging was ‘equal’ in that they did this for Clinton and Edwards, but you know who the real forging was for–Obama.  Just like the passport case.
  • Again related to Obama’s lack of constitutional eligibility, the document proving he was born in Kenya and came to the United States as an infant in August 1961 was uncovered in the Boston Public Library by the Daily Pen.
  • The ‘FED’ bought 61% of the U.S. Debt, in otherwords, WE bought the debt created by the politicians.  This is Bernacke’s  ‘quantitative easing installment no 3′ (QE 3).  This guarantees that illegal income taxes and other taxes will have to rise, further enslaving Americans…i.e, gas prices, electricity, food–all inflation based because ‘we’ bought the debt created by the politicians.
  • The SCOTUS discussion of Obamacare, where it was fairly clear that the Justices have a problem with the lack of constitutionality of the entire bill, particularly the mandate.  Obama’s reversal of his attack on Clinton’s health care plan and Obama’s threatening the Supreme Court on ‘judicial activism’ or overturning a ‘democratically passed’ bill by the supermajority left in Congress–and against the will of the American people
  • Obama’s threat to the Supreme Court over Obamacare
  • The pressure on Syria and the now funding and arming of the Syrian muslim brotherhood rebels
  • The Muslim Brotherhood running its financier candidate for President in Egypt, despite promises not to run a candidate, and the ‘shock’ of the Obama administration which armed and trained them
  • The civil war in Libya and the US involvement in Kaddafi’s murder
  • Obama’s ‘hot mic’ treason confession to the Russian president, which further masks Obama’s intent to steal the 2012 election
  • The fact of Republicans once again making a deal so that they run a nobody who (a) has no chance to beat Obama, or is (b) exactly the same as Obama, still controlled by the FED and international financiers, giving Americans once again the choice between the ‘lesser of two evils’
  • Obama accusing the republicans of that which he is a proponent of–social darwinism (that was bold)

The Anti-Christ Exposed

Don’t forget that all of this is trying to hide the fact that ‘anti-christ’ thinking has been exposed–in the luciferian bankers and politicians, the ‘left’, the muslims, the ‘progressives’, and all those lying wonders we have been warned about.  It may not be one individual at all, but a whole way of being mastered by multiple entities and individuals.  Which means we are completely vulnerable to deception by great ‘lying wonders’ produced by all of them–earthquakes, storms, tornadoes, even UFO’s–a Nazi technology.

All roads still lead back to Rome, the Jesuits, and the luciferian army which is having a field day with our confusion.  It is intentional.

Keep your eyes and ears wide open lest we fall to the temptation of minutiae which means nothing in the larger scale of things.  We ARE in the end-times, keep your focus on the true God.

What else are we missing and not supposed to see?

Obama Can’t Hide Anymore

©2012 drkate

The usurper thought he could hide his true intentions, identity, and idiocy from the American people, but he has failed miserably.  When one is so arrogant as to be transparent in his hatred of America, Americans and in particular, white people, one’s own shit eventually lands on one’s own head.  Obama could never have made it without assistance, and those who have enabled this treachery are also now exposed and subject to criminal charges due to their mistake in releasing this menace upon America.

Let’s make a list:

  • Obama was always a foreign student, took scholarship money and had his way paved for him…it is doubtful he wrote his own papers or got any grades for authentic work. By his own word, he was a foreign student. He told the postman.  We don’t need the Occidental records, his Columbia Records, or his Harvard records.  We know he is the worst kind of user.
  • Obama’s life has been a fiction of all the radical elements in America– the Weathermen Underground, aka Bill Ayers and the countless other jailed criminals who blew up federal buildings and killed policemen for fun,  counterfeited hundreds if not thousands of fraudulent identities, arranged marriages of convenience, and created false selective service registrations and birth certificates –the latter a particularly specialized known practice of the WU as they wandered around graveyards and hung out at vital statistics offices around the country in the 1970’s
  • Obama is very likely CIA sponsored, backed and covered for.
  • Obama is a muslim practicing taqiyya 
  • Obama is a foreigner and may never have been a U.S. citizen–by his own admittance his father was born british–and thus so was he–became Kenyan, and Obama was adopted by and became an Indonesian citizen.  He never had a U.S. passport–otherwise Lt. Quarles Harris would still be alive.  We don’t need to see the passport records, we already know.
  • Obama is betraying America through all of his actions–whether its giving secrets of our allies to his muslim brothers; killing our servicemen by illegally sending them into war and then disarming them; whispering on an open mic about his very obvious and treasonous plans to destabilize our own defenses
  • Obama is a serial liar who will stop at nothing to hide the truth about a gimmick meant to distract Americans from his fraudulent identity
  • Obama’s election strategy for 2012 will be to run against America–SCOTUS, Congress, Republicans, women, conservatives, white people, wall street–using the race card, false flags, and healthcare warfare, hoping to declare martial law when his thug supporters have caused enough flashmobs, murder and mayhem on American streets
  • Obama is loathed.  Americans want to see him on trial for his crimes; his handlers probably want him out of the picture in a dramatic way that ensures their control.

The establishment republicans, the democrats, and the Congress are entirely complicit in this attack on America and do not have my consent to continue.  They must all resign and be replaced starting now.  Start your recall proceedings in each state now, and don’t forget to include the judicial cowards.

Obama and his entire crowd are “merchants of despair”:

Who would you deport?  Who would you prosecute, fine, and jail?  Who should pay the ultimate price for the betrayal of America?

Why Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and Karl Rove want Romney: Because he Loses to Obama

©2012 drkate

(Author’s Note.  Update from reader Troy, h/t Katie:  Katie says:
January 18, 2012 at 11:28 am (Edit)

That video about Romney was put out by a Newt SuperPAC, and it’s name is based on the book Gingrich published “Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America” in May of 2006. I just verified it at Amazon, and remember when the WH came out with their WtF slogan, Hot Air was all over the stupidity of it, not least of which it plagiarized the Gingrich title.

Thanks to reader Troy, we have to consider that the whole republican field is another set-up and illusion of an election, where Romney will be the nominee and he will lose to Obama.  Please study the comments and this video, and think long-term.  The ‘surge’ of this republican or that one is just what it is: a mirage to make us think we have a choice.  While you may not like Ron Paul, I do not believe he is a part of this as are Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, and Huntsman.  Cain presented the illusion of a threat and had to be eliminated by innuendo.  Huntsman dropped out and endorsed Romney.  Will Bachman be the next traitor to show her part of this charade?  :mad: )

The notion that Mitt Romney routinely makes statements lacking a factual basis should not come as a surprise to anyone who has followed the campaign. On the left, Paul Krugman has marveled that no other candidate has ever “lied so freely, with so little compunction.” On the right, The American Conservative‘s Daniel Larison wondered about why he lies, concluding that the former Massachusetts governor is “so contemptuous of the people he tells lies to that he never thinks he will be found out.” 

Sounds just like Obama…so much contempt for America that he willingly lies.

Alarm bells should be ringing in everyone’s ears when Karl Rove, the establishment RINOs, GHW Bush, and democrats ‘praise’ Mitt Romney, or in the case of Nancy Piglosi, jeer at the republicans for their infighting over him.

Mitt Romney can’t climb above 25% in public opinion polls (to the extent that those are believable, it’s actually probably less than 25%), is endorsed by losers and NDAA sponsors like John McCain, and has been running for president for five years.  He’s playing it safe, trying to ‘look presidential’ and ‘grown-up’ and demonstrates his deception with every word he speaks.  His campaign slogan is deception pure and simple: ‘let’s fight for the America we love” (?)

While trying to run as a “CEO”, and ‘someone who has been in business’, and ‘knows how to create jobs’, let’s hear about Mitt Romney’s “creative destruction” of American business and jobs (h/t Bill):

Can you hear the guffaws as Romney lied in last night’s debate saying “get rid of Obamacare”?  Like the guffaws in the film above when he said that the money in corporations goes to the people?  Can you hear the democrats focusing on Romney’s corporate savagery as a convenient distraction from Obama’s savaging of America?

There are no degrees of separation between Obama and Romney.  They both think they are entitled to the presidency, and they both have the media doing everything in their power to enable the continued destruction of the Constitution.  The rinos, dinos, Rovians all want Romney to be the nominee because he will lose to Obama….and if by some miracle he wins, so that the continued theft of America and destruction of the Constitution will escalate.

By the way, did you notice that a questioner in the South Carolina debate asked Romney about his father being born outside the United States, and segued that into a discussion of immigration?  Do you notice they will never ask what a ‘natural born citizen’ is?  How many of us tweeted that question to be totally ignored?  The media and republicans are scared to death of that subject.

C H I C K E N S.

That's a lot of chicken sh** on the national stage!

Note to Candidates: Grow a Pair!

©2011 drkate

Who is best for AMERICA?

I must confess…I don’t believe that anyone in the Republican field really wants to win the 2012 election.  I also have a feeling that none of them want to defeat Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama.

This is a critical moment in our lifetimes, one in which the passionate constitutionalists are the awake voters who care deeply for our country, and the GOP is like warm vanilla ice cream.  They are the faux opposition to the NWO, pretending to be republicans, conservatives, and constitutionalists when they are up to their eyeballs in the corruption.

Thanks to the hard work of every Patriot, we have educated many…and millions of people have had a paradigm shift regarding the political elite’s mockingbird tune, the presence and tools of the New World Order (NWO), and the reality of the increasing theft of our liberties.

Its time for the GOP and all those candidates to grow a pair.  :mad:

Note to the republican candidates: Do you really want to win this thing or not? If not, get off the stage.

The candidates need to stop the gimmicks, snide remarks, threats, and posturing, and start talking about the things that really shape our future and the way Obama and Congress have misled Americans.  Oh, and the media outlets should all lose their licenses to operate–they are state-sponsored media paid to do a job on Americans.

End of rant.

***************

Name the candidates you would trust protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, and include all who are running.  Who in that position would most enable you to get a good night’s rest?  Why or why not?  Who should they include in their government?

There are rough waters ahead.

Antarctica

Christmas 2011

©2011 drkate

Angels we have heard on high…
Singing sweetly through the night…

And the mountains in reply
Echoing their great delight
 

Please enjoy these Christmas Stories!  With thanks to Kirk MacKenzie of Defend Rural America

Merry Christmas!  :smile:

Useless Idiots

©2011 The Birthers

Cross-posted with permission

Things for a Useless Idiot to do.

How to Make a Pawn


Meet the Useless Idiot Pawn Maker

Matt Lewis

watch him lose his pawn and the game!

The headline today at the pseudo-conservitive DailyCaller is a little misleading Coming soon: Rubio ‘birthers,’ it is misleading because we already been there.

Well over a month ago several leading Birthers, including my dear friend Dr Kate, and I were trading notes on this very subject. Much of what we discussed can be seen in her article Questions for Marco Rubio, released on July 27, 2011 almost a month before Matt dropped his pinky on the keyboard.

News Flash for Matt: We just don’t know the status of Marco Rubio as of yet. While the Supreme Court did define a natural born citizen as one being born in the United States of America to two US citizen parents, they left the question of those born in the US to alien parents unanswered.

The simple fact is the circumstances surrounding Rubio’s birth in Florida and Obama’s purported birth in Hawaii are the condition of the parents. Rubio’s alien parents were classified as Permanent Residents while Obama’s alien parent was never classified as an immigrant, he was only given a temporary visa, which makes Rubio clearly a 14th Amendment citizen.

The transfer of Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio is unclear because the Cuban Constitution he was born under was suspended well before his birth by both Batistia and Fidel Castro. It has been reported that his parents were defectors of the repressive regime of Fidel Castro, and may have caused them to loose their Cuban citizenship the moment they stepped foot on American soil, leaving them stateless. The fact is we simply cannot see what went on behind the “Communist Cuban Cana Curtain.” The truth is we looked at Rubio’s allegiance at birth, not only where he was born and his parents, and we simply can not say with absolute certainty Marco Rubio was born with only US citizenship, so that no other country could claim his allegiance. Obama, on the other hand, self-documents his birth was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 and in doing so admits he was born a dual citizen, having multiple claims to his natural allegiance.

So why is Matt Lewis making a pawn out of Marco Rubio? Why are you so willing to sacrifice Rubio? As a pawn is sacrificed for a greater piece or to force a retreat, the answer to Lewis’ strategy lies in the closing of his article, if we question Rubio then in Matt’s pea sized mind we are not partisan hacks, but instead we are “either consistent racists — or consistently misguided adherents to the Constitution.”

Racists?

Let me get this straight, if we question Rubio we are “consistent racists.” This means we don’t like blacks and we don’t like whites and since we are already on record questioning the natural born citizenship of Bobby Jindal, that must mean we don’t like Indians either. I guess we Birthers are either Chinese, or Eskimos.

The simple fact is when know-nothing, useless idiots cannot win the argument on the facts they resort to calling us racists.

consistently misguided adherents to the Constitution?

What does he mean by misguided adherents? Oh, yes, I forgot the Constitution of the United States is a “living document” that can change with the times and not a binding contract between We, the people and the government we created.

This is what we are to expect from useless idiots like Matt Lewis, as they try to make pawns out of others like Marco Rubio instead of honestly debating the issue of what qualities a natural born citizen has a birth and then examining those qualities to determine if a person is or is not a natural born citizen.

What we know to be fact is that these qualities a natural-born citizen are to “provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government.” John Jay. Could unalienable and undivided allegiance to the United States be the quality of a natural born citizen? And wouldn’t being born in the United States to parents who are citizens of the United States remove the possibility of a foreigner (dual citizen) gaining admission as a natural born citizen?

We also know that “At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875)

I guess we are pretty misguided alright. Tell me Matt how should we adhere to the US Constitution?

Checkmate

While you can position your pieces thinking you have an advantage, very often your opponent sees through your moves, and the pawn you set out to sacrifice for your advantage simply becomes lost, sacrificed for nothing.

In searching the circumstances of Marco Rubio birth we discovered that like Obama, and many other politicians, Rubio it seems has developed a tendency to creatively, create a biography suited to their particular needs. (i.e. That is stretching the facts.)

The official US records show that Rubio’s father came to the United States 999 days before Fidel Castro’s takeover!

Matt, you are a useless idiot and you just sacrificed a more or less decent man. Are you happy now?

Just so you know, here is how we plan on fighting the racism charges by you and the rest of the LameStream useless idiots. Here is our campaign slogan.

In 2008, you voted for Obama to prove you were not a racist.

In 2012, you will have a chance not to vote for Obama and prove you are NOT an IDIOT.

On Constitutional Authority

©2011 drkate

Building the 2nd American Republic

If we wish to think seriously about government there are certain basic questions we must ask. For example, we need to figure out how legitimate governments are established, or to put it in slightly different terms, we have to ask, “What is the foundation of legitimate political authority?” ~ Center for Civic Education

More than one hundred years before the Founders developed the Constitution for the united States, philosopher John Locke articulated the foundation for a government of, by and for the people.  By looking at the problem from the vantage of viewing what life  would be like without government, Locke called man in this state as being in a state of nature,

and argued that it “has a law of nature to govern it which obliges everyone, and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions….”

This state antedates any form of government, yet guides the purpose of government and the extent of its political authority. Fundamentally, it also provides the reason why a people would leave such a state of nature to form a government.

Locke held that the inalienable rights of individuals form the basis of all rightful governments. According to him, individuals possess these rights simply by virtue of their humanity… The authority exercised by governments is exercised on the basis of the consent of the governed and they consent to the exercise of that authority in order to acquire security for their natural rights to life, liberty and estate.

The rest is our history, you know. The thirteen independent sovereign states joined together to create our government whose purpose is to secure our natural rights. The law that empowered that government was the Constitution. They chose liberty and formed a government to secure it.

Government exists only with the consent of the governed and pursuant only to government officials’ lawful exercise of  their duties under the Constitution and their oath of office:

“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” (not ‘so help me Allah‘…)

In the context of the original design and foundation of the Constitution, every single act, decision, expenditure of funds, declaration of war, and economic policy by the Obama administration, the Federal Reserve, and the  111th and 112th Congress is  null and void. Obama is ineligible and the Congress has abrogated its responsibilities.

The only Constitutional authority held lawfully in the United States today is held by We the People in and of the States. 

We have not exercised our Constitutional authority in more than fifty years. We instead continue to talk about it while our nation burns to the ground and the world is allied against America.  We blame ourselves, each other, Obama, the Congress, the republicans, the democrats, our lack of faith, the system.  More divisions emerge for us to describe, counter, understand, ignore, or cast into intrigue. Just enough information to keep from taking action.

Well, the darkest hour has arrived, and the line in the sand is bright for all to see.  It will be even a longer time before the light of day if we don’t start taking action now.

We are all ‘Birthers’ now.

Questions for Marco Rubio

©2011 drkate

This essay is written to clarify the questions regarding Senator Marco Rubio’s constitutional eligibility for the office of Vice President or President.  During this study, it has become apparent how important the citizenship of the parents is to determining whether the child is a natural born citizen and why this remains a national security issue at its core.

Natural Born Citizen?

We understand that in the 235 years of our Nation’s history, the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ as used in our Constitution has not changed.  From this it is paramount that both parents must be citizens and have no foreign allegiance when the child is born in order for that child to be the Constitutional Article II natural born citizen.  On the surface then, Marco Rubio is not a natural born citizen because his parents were not American citizens at the time of his birth but naturalized four years later.

One would think this is the end of the story.  Not.

Rubio’s supporters, including republicans who don’t think about Article II, obots still trying to justify Obama’s existence, and the Tea Party, will want to bury Rubio’s natural born citizen issue first and foremost, perpetuating or covering up the constitutional crisis we are in with the usurper Obama. This will be done either for expediency to defeat Obama or continuing to cover for Obama, but it perpetuates a disservice to our Constitution.

For those who would like to take an analytical approach, examining the real questions of citizenship instead of glossing over them, this article is for you. The analysis reveals that in order for Marco Rubio to stand for either President or Vice President, he would need a SCOTUS ruling to determine if his citizenship at birth was undivided and unalienable.  Without this ruling, he would be another constitutionally ineligible candidate, no matter how much you like him.

Continue reading ‘Questions for Marco Rubio’


November 2014
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,695,746 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 604 other followers