Archive for the 'John McCain loser' Category

Footprints and Fig Leaves

@2014 drkate

So it was a video, eh?

Obama's Benghazi Flag

Obama’s Benghazi Flag

 

In a stunning, must read article called “The Benghazi Brief–The Entire Story of Operation Zero Footprint in Libya and Why Further Benghazi Committee Hearings are Futile…” author Sundance exposes the covert arms smuggling operations underway in Libya long before the disaster of 9/11/12 that resulted in the deaths of four Americans under the “watch” of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.  The operation was designed to transfer weapons, including missiles, to the Libyan rebels for the purpose of regime change murdering Ghaddafi and ushering in the jihadists as was the hallmark of Ms. “What difference does it make” Clinton’s so called “Arab Jihadi Spring.”  The operation was designed to leave no U.S. footprint…although the U.S. House and Senate “Gang of Eight” plus John McCain, as well as other key officials knew what the plan was.  Sometime after “Operation Zero Footprint” was underway, a second covert operation began to supply weapons to the Syrian rebels–ISIS–for the purpose of regime change in Syria with the planned use of the Libya operation as a model to transmit arms to Syrian rebels through Turkey.

obama-hillary-holding-hands-wh-photoOperation “Fig Leaf”  went into full gear after the murder of four Americans by Obama and Clinton’s foreign follies, with Ambassador Rice’s laughable and tragic attempt to blame the deaths of Americans on some stupid video,Clinton’s “concussion” and plane crash in Iran (as usual with pallets of money involved), making excuses for Obama’s absence while Viceroy Jarrett ordered the military to stand down, the firing of Paetreus, and the theft of the 2012 election following suit.  The fig leaf operation is still in effect…as the ISIS rebels that Obama and Clinton armed through operation zero footprint are now the same people the U.S. is bombing in Iraq, with Obama planning a long campaign.

The author of this article’s notes are telling…

The primary reason for outlining this brief is to deliver a greater understanding of why things happened the way they did in the post 9/11/12 attack media frenzy.

If you understand what took place from March 2011 through the night of the attack itself all of the contradictions reconcile, and most of the questions become answered.

~snip~

Ultimately the leadership within the State Department, The CIA, and the White House are responsible for the outcomes of policy.

~snip~

Ultimately the Trey Gowdy select committee will find there is no venue to discuss intelligence operations with public sunlight…. There is a matter of an unidentified State Dept $6 billion contractor fund missing from Hillary’s term as Secretary of State;  that might bear investigation.  However, beyond those smaller questions there is little if anything to gain.

As well as the questions posed in the comments to the post:

There is something that I don’t understand. You were able to get all of this information and put the puzzle together and publish this piece out into the universe for all to read. But somehow, Trey Gowdy’s investigation can’t dig into this because of the secret covert nature of the operation? “…no venue to discuss Intelligence operations in public sunlight.” But it is all right here. It already is public.

~snip~

Great question.. This is an incredible piece of information and makes clear to me so many unanswered questions. As you questioned, if Sundance knows this, why not Trey Gowdy or is Gowdy part of the scheme now?

operation-zero-footprint

Americans remember Benghazi, and all the other insults to and injuries of the American people brought on by this murderous regime.

figleaf obama

Open Thread.

 

 

 

Questions for a Constitutional Convention

©2013 drkate

Of all the so called ‘Patriot Actions’ the one that is most disturbing to me is the call for a Constitutional Convention.  Over the last several years many have proposed new amendments to the Constitution, including some of the major provisions such as the qualifications for the office of the president, and other amendments that require Congress to follow the same rules as citizens of the United States and a balanced budget amendment.

What we don’t hear, even from the patriots, is the need to eliminate illegal amendments–those not ratified properly by the states– such as the 14th, 16th, and 17th amendments.  Nor do we hear calls for the restoration of the original 13th Amendment, which would have prevented lawyers (titles of nobility such as ‘esquire) to serve in government.  And of course, nobody talks about enforcing the existing constitution, which for example would eliminate the need for a ‘balanced budget amendment’ because Congress would have to stay within its enumerated powers.

So the lawyers and lobbyists across the country are pushing for a Constitutional Convention, glaringly a ‘con’ as in ‘con con’.  Remember this is the same group of people who were barred from serving in government by the original 13th amendment, which ‘disappeared’ from the Constitution  after the war of 1812.  The British burned the White House and the effort was to eliminate the records, research, and proceedings that produced the Declaration of Independence and the first Constitutional Convention which produced the Constitution for the United States.

The lawyers and legal profession, and its gaggle of judges, would go on to essentially ‘gut’ the Constitution’s provisions by developing the Administrative Procedures Act  (APA) and other “legal tools” to prevent we the people from even knowing the strength of the Constitution’s provisions and the protection of our  God-given rights enshrined therein.   The APA essentially makes it impossible to gut excessive agency development, for example, the EPA, and allows a suit only on the grounds that it violates the APA, not the Constitution’s limits on executive power. If the lawyers were barred initially from serving in the government, what are they doing now rewriting the constitution?

What will Disappear in the New Constitution? 

Photo of Ayers taken on September 11, 2001

Photo of Ayers taken on September 11, 2001

You can believe that our founding on God’s law–common law–will be eliminated.  This is the dream of all the marxist dems and all the republicans, now clearly just one part of the cabal that dislikes the American people and disrespects our founding documents, calls our founding fathers ‘terrorists’, and claims that our constitution is fatally flawed.  This propaganda has been spread to the general population through government schools (Common Core, anyone?), and now through our churches which have completed the ‘falling away’ as  2 Thessalonians 2:3 predicted.  And here we have Pastors saying that the American people do not deserve liberty anymore.  We can point fingers at everyone else as to who is responsible for this debacle, but when you point one finger at anyone three point back at you.

If our founding principles disappear, then all we have is a counterfeit.  That suits satan’s purposes just fine.  As long as we don’t remember God, or Jesus the Christ, our the founding principles of common law within the ten commandments, then confusion and lies will reign.  That’s the plan.

Questions for a Constitutional Convention

Is a Constitutional Convention an appropriate tool to renew the foundations of liberty in America?  Here are some questions for consideration that will help you decide!

  1. What will a Constitutional Convention cover?  What rules will limit the scope and coverage of a Constitutional Convention?
  2. How are the delegates to the Constitutional Convention selected?  Who selects them?
  3. What choice do ‘we the people’ have in selecting Convention Delegates and what assurance do the people have that these delegates will be truly representative of the people?
  4. Why are Constitutional Convention proponents mostly lawyers?
  5. Do people know that a Constitutional Convention has as much power as a joint session of Congress?
  6. Will the Constitutional Convention rewrite the constitution?
  7. How can we prevent the Constitutional Convention from rewriting the Constitution?
  8. It is known that the Obama regime has already drafted a new Constitution, its ready to go.  What will prevent Obama’s constitution from replacing our constitution?
  9. The original 13th Amendment prohibited lawyers (anyone who took a title such as “Esquire”) from serving in government.  Why is it that mostly lawyers are promoting a Constitutional Convention, and shouldn’t they be barred from participating?
  10. What provisions, or where is the law, that provides for a state to rescind its call for a Constitutional Convention?
  11. Will a Constitutional Convention be able to rescind or remove the 14th, 16th, and 17th Amendments, which were not properly ratified by the States?
  12. The Constitution is based on Common Law.  The lawyers have corrupted this and believe the Constitution is ‘case law’.  Will the Constitutional Convention return us to Common Law?
  13. Most attorneys ignored Article II of the constitution  which confirms that Obama is not constitutionally eligible to serve as president, saying it was  ‘a matter of interpretation’.  Who are they to now rewrite the Constitution?
  14. How can a constitutional convention defeat the liberal agenda when the call to revise the constitution is a call from the left, liberal, lawyers???

What is going on in your part of the country on a Constitutional Convention?  Where do citizens, legislators, Pastors, and attorneys stand on this issue in your state?

You Really Should Go Home

©2013 drkate

Open Thread!

The Friends of John McBama

©2013 drkate

These are John McCain’s freedom fighters rebels.  His goal is regime change.

These are Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry’s “we have to bomb Syria to find out who the rebels are

These are Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian/Libyan/Turkish/Saudi operatives, his Al Queda friends, the ones who he will ‘draw a red line’ for.

These are the fighters against Christians.  Remember Kosovo?  Serbia?  “Paving the way for radical islamic jihad, one nation at a time.”

These are the people responsible for the use of chemical weapons.

These are the lies that experienced liars spout.  WMD’s?  What WMD’s?  Kerry is repeating Colin Powell’s lies to the world.

We all bleed the same color.  RED

American blood spilled for decidedly un-American causes.

American blood spilled in a war against Christianity…a war against our very foundation.

Here they are–the Syrian rebels posted this picture on their FACEBOOK page of how they feel about the U.S. Congress–vote for war or you will die.

From the Facebook page of the al-Aqsa Islamic Brigades:

firecongresssyria-550x412

h/t Weasel Zippers

Open Thread

The Gang of Apes

©2013 drkate

…err,  the Gang of Eight

Here we have the rino neanderthals undoing America on our dime.

Part One

Part Two

Your thoughts?

Open thread

John McCain’s Collusion with Barack Obama

©drkate 2012

The problem with John McCain’s campaign ‘against’ Obama in 2008–and all the republicans–was that he intended to lose all along.  When he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate, he almost won the election because of her popularity.  So he had to undermine her and his republican, luciferian, and banking cabal had to manufacture an economic crisis quickly, and engineer his poor response, to make sure Obama ‘won’ the election.  Not to mention that McCain lost more than 10 million republican votes because they simply stayed home and wouldn’t vote for him.  It will be just the same with Mitt Romney–we don’t want him as our candidate but the republicans have once again engineered their own defeat just to play games with the demon-crats.

Its time that John McCain was confronted and recalled. There are many of us in Arizona that will be initiating a recall campaign of John McCain very soon, and soon enough you will see our fundraising efforts posted everywhere.  We will need about a quarter of a million signatures–Maricopa County alone could provide most of them…considering McCain’s obvious treason involved in purposely losing to, failing to expose, and current collaboration with Obama.

Here is an open letter to McCain from Dr. David Earl-Graef LtCol USAFR, (h/t Jeff Lichter)

Open letter to: Sen. John Sydney McCain III:

Not so long ago in the military there were certain acts looked upon with such disdain that we seldom even spoke of them. In fact, we seldom actually encountered them, so there was no need. One is cowardice and another is worse, much worse –treason.

For the sake of others reading this letter, I point out that all service members enlisted and officer alike takes an Oath. While the Oaths are slightly different we are individually bound to them. What follows is the Oath taken by the Officers:

“I, (state your name), having been appointed a (rank) in the United States (branch of service), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the office upon which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

It is important for those seeing this for the first time to note, the Oath for officers specifically states that the Constitution will be supported and defended against all enemies and it acknowledges that the enemy may be found on foreign soil or in one’s own backyard. I would even say an enemy can arise in oneself if the desires of personal gain or power or sense of self importance are allowed to become greater than the desire to honor ones Oath. Perhaps indeed, this is the greatest enemy for none are immune to it and it is insidious in is appearance.

Would you not agree, Senator McCain, it is implicit that a United States Military Officer or Public servant who takes this oath and then conspires or is a party to an act or actions that seeks to undermine by purpose of evasion, the spirit and intent of the Constitution of the United States would fit the definition a traitor? Would you not also agree that those who take the Oath are not at liberty to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution they will defend while choosing to ignore others? One part is not separable from the others just as we, as a Nation, are not separable from the sovereignty of our creator from which our rights come.

Some time ago, I wrote you a personal letter pleading with you to honor your oath you took as a Military officer and then again as a United States Senator. The letter cover was clearly marked that the contents were personal and for you only. While it was initially returned unopened- the second mailing was not, so I must assume you received it.

In my letter I pleaded with you to once again display the courage you did as young Naval Aviator and then as a POW in Vietnam. I asked you to stop and consider if you had put your own ambitions and sense of self importance in front of your duty. I asked you to step forward and apologize to the Nation for not being honest with us. I assured you and I had full confidence that such an act of humility would be accepted and the American People would forgive you of your trespass, for your action would spare us from an ongoing injustice of such proportion our Nation has never seen before. I pleaded with you for the good of our Nation and even for your own redemption to come forward and expose the greatest fraud that has been and is being perpetrated on the American people; a fraud in which you yourself played a part. I acknowledged how difficult it would be and I also acknowledged the necessity of it just the same. I NEVER received an answer-nothing from you, not so much as single word. Not an explanation-nothing. The same silence you exhibited during the 2008 campaign.

So now I am given no choice but to write this for all to see. I cannot find the words to describe the extent of my disappointment but only state that it grieves me immensely as I trusted you and respected you as a fellow military officer. Before I discovered what I am about to tell the Citizens, I even gave you something that was precious to me, my vote for you to become the President of the United States. In this moment, I would rather have suffered total disenfranchisement from my right to vote, than to bear the shame and embarrassment that I gave my vote to you.

As a US Military officer, in keeping with my oath of office I demand that you, Sen. John Sydney McCain III, answer not to me but to the to the Citizens of the United States why you are not guilty of treason. Please show them that I am in error and that you did not betray your Oath as an Officer and as a Representative of the People. Explain to them why your name and that of Barrack Hussein Obama BOTH appear on Senate resolution 511 declaring you John Sydney McCain III a “Natural Born Citizen” by virtue that BOTH of your parents were US Citizens regardless you were not born on sovereign US soil.

I am not going to belabor myself explaining to you the basis for my assertion that neither you or Barack Hussein Obama meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of POTUS. I am certain you know what defines a “Natural Born Citizen “and America is leaning quickly. What I am clearly stating is that both you and Barak Obama had SERIOUS questions regarding your qualifications under Art. II section 1 of the United States Constitution. I am clearly stating that BOTH your names are in the Congressional record of SR 511. Tell me how this does not show that there was collusion between you and Barack Hussein Obama to undermine the Constitution of The United States. Why is Barack Hussein Obamas name on that document with yours? Is this what bought your silence during the campaign?

Many people believe that if Barack Obama was not qualified to hold the office YOU would have brought this up during the campaign. Those that are less informed and support Barack Obama use this claim as “proof” that Barack Obama is himself qualified. They use this to ridicule and demean the very citizens you represent and you do absolutely nothing except remain silent on the issue and let them bear the brunt of the insults. You stood by while Lt Col Terry Lakin was stripped of his honor, everything taken from him to include his freedom just as you were in Vietnam and you did NOTHING. Do you not think the People have a right to an explanation? Tell them plainly why YOU would not be BEHOLDING to Barack Obama on the very issue of eligibility?

It is not now nor ever was my intent to publically humiliate you, or in any way bring disrespect upon the office of the Senate that you occupy. I hope you see that you have given me no choice but to move this to the public arena. I will not remain silent while I see our Constitution shredded before my eyes by what appears to be an act of treason. You were elected to serve the people not yourself and you are not above them. I am certain that this letter will make you angry but I am not the one who betrayed my Oath, you are. Please, I am asking you again to step forward and do what is right for yourself and the country. We all have made mistakes and we all are entitled to forgiveness but only when we confess those mistakes and ask for it.

If I am wrong I will withdraw my demand and offer you a public apology and I will ask for forgiveness from you. If I am right however I remind you that Judas Iscariot had his price, the promise of 30 pieces of Silver. For him, in the end, he lost everything to include his soul. No price is worth that. Certainly not the Presidency, not your Senate seat – not even if one were to gain the entire world. Was a Quid pro Quo in the form of a promise of silence regarding the illegal candidacy of Barack Hussein Obama your price? Did you commit treason or were you duped? I still believe you have an opportunity to reconcile yourself to your Oath of office and to the American people and to God; but the open door to this opportunity will at some point close FOREVER and no amount of pleading to the people will redeem you. The cloak of darkness that has kept this from the American people is rapidly coming unraveled. This fraud WILL BE EXPOSED and your part in it will not be forgotten. You will be held accountable to the American people in a court of law or before the Congress. Do not miss the opportunity to step forward -the time is now not later.

Sincerely,

Dr. David Earl-Graef LtCol USAFR

For more information:

  • Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, skewered by his own attorney.  The attorney was provided to him by the so-called “Patriots Union”, JB Williams‘ outfit…who bragged about it but never showed up for the trial.
  • Those who escaped jail for asking the same question Lakin did.
  • Terrorists have more rights than our own soldiers.
  • Misprision of Treason for senators and congressmen for failing the American people and violating their oath of office

Why Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and Karl Rove want Romney: Because he Loses to Obama

©2012 drkate

(Author’s Note.  Update from reader Troy, h/t Katie:  Katie says:
January 18, 2012 at 11:28 am (Edit)

That video about Romney was put out by a Newt SuperPAC, and it’s name is based on the book Gingrich published “Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America” in May of 2006. I just verified it at Amazon, and remember when the WH came out with their WtF slogan, Hot Air was all over the stupidity of it, not least of which it plagiarized the Gingrich title.

Thanks to reader Troy, we have to consider that the whole republican field is another set-up and illusion of an election, where Romney will be the nominee and he will lose to Obama.  Please study the comments and this video, and think long-term.  The ‘surge’ of this republican or that one is just what it is: a mirage to make us think we have a choice.  While you may not like Ron Paul, I do not believe he is a part of this as are Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, and Huntsman.  Cain presented the illusion of a threat and had to be eliminated by innuendo.  Huntsman dropped out and endorsed Romney.  Will Bachman be the next traitor to show her part of this charade?  :mad: )

The notion that Mitt Romney routinely makes statements lacking a factual basis should not come as a surprise to anyone who has followed the campaign. On the left, Paul Krugman has marveled that no other candidate has ever “lied so freely, with so little compunction.” On the right, The American Conservative‘s Daniel Larison wondered about why he lies, concluding that the former Massachusetts governor is “so contemptuous of the people he tells lies to that he never thinks he will be found out.” 

Sounds just like Obama…so much contempt for America that he willingly lies.

Alarm bells should be ringing in everyone’s ears when Karl Rove, the establishment RINOs, GHW Bush, and democrats ‘praise’ Mitt Romney, or in the case of Nancy Piglosi, jeer at the republicans for their infighting over him.

Mitt Romney can’t climb above 25% in public opinion polls (to the extent that those are believable, it’s actually probably less than 25%), is endorsed by losers and NDAA sponsors like John McCain, and has been running for president for five years.  He’s playing it safe, trying to ‘look presidential’ and ‘grown-up’ and demonstrates his deception with every word he speaks.  His campaign slogan is deception pure and simple: ‘let’s fight for the America we love” (?)

While trying to run as a “CEO”, and ‘someone who has been in business’, and ‘knows how to create jobs’, let’s hear about Mitt Romney’s “creative destruction” of American business and jobs (h/t Bill):

Can you hear the guffaws as Romney lied in last night’s debate saying “get rid of Obamacare”?  Like the guffaws in the film above when he said that the money in corporations goes to the people?  Can you hear the democrats focusing on Romney’s corporate savagery as a convenient distraction from Obama’s savaging of America?

There are no degrees of separation between Obama and Romney.  They both think they are entitled to the presidency, and they both have the media doing everything in their power to enable the continued destruction of the Constitution.  The rinos, dinos, Rovians all want Romney to be the nominee because he will lose to Obama….and if by some miracle he wins, so that the continued theft of America and destruction of the Constitution will escalate.

By the way, did you notice that a questioner in the South Carolina debate asked Romney about his father being born outside the United States, and segued that into a discussion of immigration?  Do you notice they will never ask what a ‘natural born citizen’ is?  How many of us tweeted that question to be totally ignored?  The media and republicans are scared to death of that subject.

C H I C K E N S.

That's a lot of chicken sh** on the national stage!

Zero Degrees of Separation

©2012 drkate

The Oscar-winning film, Babel, is based on the concept of Six Degrees of Separation. The lives of all of the characters were intimately intertwined, although they did not know each other and lived thousands of miles from each other.

As we discussed in Birds of a Feather, there is no difference between Clinton, Bush I, Bush II, and Obama.

And we should all know by now that there is absolutely no difference between Romney, Perry, Gingrich, Santorum and Barack Obama.  Nada, zilch, zero degrees of separation.   They are all bildgerbergers, globalists, and big government types, and have never upheld their oath to protect and defend the constitution. We all know that Obama is not even eligible for the position, having criminally defrauded the entire Nation in 2008.  They are politicians who by definition are liars intent upon seizing control, power and money to further their own and the globalist’s agenda.

 
The American Spectator actually had the courage to publish an article describing Mitt Romney as the least electable of the candidates

Who is going to take seriously a Wall Street millionaire calling for tax cuts for millionaires? That is why he personally is not a good vessel for carrying the Republican standard this year. He is actually a perfect caricature for the neo-Marxist class warfare arguments of Obama and the Occupy Wall Street rabble. That is one reason why Romney, in fact, is the least electable.

~snip~

On monetary policy, Romney again thinks like an establishment, country club, Republican businessman.

~snip~

With Mitt Romney as the nominee, the Republican Washington Establishment will be back in charge, and the Reagan Revolution will be long forgotten history. That was the meaning of the endorsement of Romney by John McCain, embraced by Romney with such relish.

If you can find a difference, let me know:

  • What is the difference between Michelle and Barack Obama and a racist?
  • What is the difference between republicans and democrats? 
  • What’s the difference between Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, or Rick Santorum?
  • What’s the difference between JB Williams and Barack Obama?

Time for a real revolution!

The Man Who Couldn’t Beat Obama Endorses the Man Who Couldn’t Beat McCain

©2012 drkate

John McCain endorsed Mitt Romney.   Its the kiss of death, LOL!  ’nuff said.

Open thread.


September 2014
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,680,285 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 606 other followers