Who needs imagination?
Open thread on all things in the twilight zone!
Thoughts on Our Constitutional Republic
I was struck by these words describing our situation in America, with a foreign agent acting as president, and the full capitulation of the government:
So the issue of the Birther forgeries was literally an operation coming from the operatives inside the Obama camp in their hired contractors. Just as Mockingbird was active in the JFK conspiracies, the same back fire was lit in the Birther issue in those forgeries. Inflame an issue with enough ludicrous forgeries, rough up Lt. Col. Terry Lakin for having an Asian wife, and allow the psychotic to act out with full protection of the police state, and the masses will never gell to impeach Obama, as the fight will be turned to how deranged the Patriots are…
Notice how the fundamental constitutional issue of natural born citizenship, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 got marginalized by the intentional creation of the “Birther forgeries” and then ridicule “Birthers’, who were nothing more than Americans who know that the Constitution is supposed to rule. And we knew from the constitution and a few other places by doing our own research of the unconstitutionality of the man calling himself Obama without ever discussing the birth certificate. Elections had to be stolen, especially in 2012, and will be in 2016 for the same reason.
That basic violation of the Constitution throws a lot out the window, and perhaps that is the basic reason for the lawlessness of this administration and the
tumble trickle-down effect on federal, state, and local agencies of government. At one of the highest level in our government—the Executive–the laws of the United States are not implemented, whole branches of government are ignored or cut-out of decision-making, free speech is ignored or punished, and wholesale assaults on the freedoms which are guaranteed by our Constitution regularly occur with the very foundation of governance undermined and ultimately replaced.
Both the Judiciary and Congress have taken over control of certain areas, and left others alone, which benefit their financial and political interests. The common motivator is money and power–things of the human sphere–even if within their system there are fierce internal rivalries. They think they can buy a Stairway to Heaven, or rule the world, or even save themselves from certain change, wayyyyy beyond “global warming”.
The example set at the federal level is that you can violate the law and get away with it…thinking Lois Lerner, Eric Holder, that Congress won’t pay attention to it or will give it lip service, and that free speech is not respected nor is the public opinion. For the first time in history the federal government has outwardly declared war on the citizens, at least the ones who call themselves patriots, veterans, Christians, constitutionalists, and… (name your favorite traditional American Organization here…)
Use this thread to check out your state, county, and local level governments and their ability to follow the rule of law. How are they governed? Who are they actually governed by? How are our institutions changing?
How deep does it go?
Open thread, in addition to the request above!
Of all the so called ‘Patriot Actions’ the one that is most disturbing to me is the call for a Constitutional Convention. Over the last several years many have proposed new amendments to the Constitution, including some of the major provisions such as the qualifications for the office of the president, and other amendments that require Congress to follow the same rules as citizens of the United States and a balanced budget amendment.
What we don’t hear, even from the patriots, is the need to eliminate illegal amendments–those not ratified properly by the states– such as the 14th, 16th, and 17th amendments. Nor do we hear calls for the restoration of the original 13th Amendment, which would have prevented lawyers (titles of nobility such as ‘esquire) to serve in government. And of course, nobody talks about enforcing the existing constitution, which for example would eliminate the need for a ‘balanced budget amendment’ because Congress would have to stay within its enumerated powers.
So the lawyers and lobbyists across the country are pushing for a Constitutional Convention, glaringly a ‘con’ as in ‘con con’. Remember this is the same group of people who were barred from serving in government by the original 13th amendment, which ‘disappeared’ from the Constitution after the war of 1812. The British burned the White House and the effort was to eliminate the records, research, and proceedings that produced the Declaration of Independence and the first Constitutional Convention which produced the Constitution for the United States.
The lawyers and legal profession, and its gaggle of judges, would go on to essentially ‘gut’ the Constitution’s provisions by developing the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) and other “legal tools” to prevent we the people from even knowing the strength of the Constitution’s provisions and the protection of our God-given rights enshrined therein. The APA essentially makes it impossible to gut excessive agency development, for example, the EPA, and allows a suit only on the grounds that it violates the APA, not the Constitution’s limits on executive power. If the lawyers were barred initially from serving in the government, what are they doing now rewriting the constitution?
What will Disappear in the New Constitution?
You can believe that our founding on God’s law–common law–will be eliminated. This is the dream of all the marxist dems and all the republicans, now clearly just one part of the cabal that dislikes the American people and disrespects our founding documents, calls our founding fathers ‘terrorists’, and claims that our constitution is fatally flawed. This propaganda has been spread to the general population through government schools (Common Core, anyone?), and now through our churches which have completed the ‘falling away’ as 2 Thessalonians 2:3 predicted. And here we have Pastors saying that the American people do not deserve liberty anymore. We can point fingers at everyone else as to who is responsible for this debacle, but when you point one finger at anyone three point back at you.
If our founding principles disappear, then all we have is a counterfeit. That suits satan’s purposes just fine. As long as we don’t remember God, or Jesus the Christ, our the founding principles of common law within the ten commandments, then confusion and lies will reign. That’s the plan.
Questions for a Constitutional Convention
Is a Constitutional Convention an appropriate tool to renew the foundations of liberty in America? Here are some questions for consideration that will help you decide!
What is going on in your part of the country on a Constitutional Convention? Where do citizens, legislators, Pastors, and attorneys stand on this issue in your state?
Obama is so desperate to hang onto power that his false flags are openly broadcast and evident to all but the most obtuse. A cold-blooded killer, he has no worries about setting them up to murder Americans. You can bet when he’s involved, he will go to a ‘memorial service’ at the site. Think Gabby Giffords (Judge John Roll’s murder), Sandy Hook, Aurora, Boston. Think Andrew Breitbart, too, although Obama’s memorial would have been too obvious, and the dozens of people murdered during this regime’s reign.
The falseness of these events where Americans are murdered is shown by all the actors that show up to pretend they were gravely wounded–like the guy who faked losing his legs at the Boston Marathon, identified as a faker through videos of his actual loss of limbs in Afghanistan and his putting on a prosthetic at the site of the bombing in Boston. Do you actually think that a man with both his legs blown off would be conscious and holding a tourniquet on his own leg?
And like magic, the media go on a feeding frenzy pointing out the suspect who was never involved in the plot in the first place, pointing away from the obvious involvement of Obama’s hit squad–Eric Holder, Valerie Jarrett, Naps Napolitano, Blackwater security, and dozens of other ‘lessor players’. Of course, Obama is just using CIA assets who have been brainwashed in the MKUltra program, or hit with a drug like scopolomine.
An article posted here over a year ago identified the hallmarks of a false flag:
And we add to the list
Here is something possibly scheduled for April 28–a facebook posting on a nuclear event in Lost Angeles. Now that this is out the city will be changed or the event scheduled for another time:
Do some digging on this please! :shock:
What should our focus be on now?
…and the list goes on…
The mockingbird media–even the ones who are supposedly ‘exposing’ all of this, have their own agenda too. Is it to stifle revolt, or to incite premature revolt of the American people? Think carefully about who you trust right now.
The false flaggers will answer to God, and it won’t be pretty. Got your place in the lake of fire yet?
Spiritual wickedness in high places, indeed.
Abdul Karim Hassan is a naturalized citizen who wishes to run for the Presidency of the United States. This even though the Constitution says “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Hassan v Scott Gessler, Colorado SoS
Business Insider reported on September 5, 2012, Abdul Karim Hassan’s series of lawsuits claiming his right to run for the Presidency have been denied in the Second, Third, and now Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A similar ruling was issued September 28, 2012 for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
The significance of these rulings cannot be underestimated as they affirm that the natural born citizen clause of Article II of the U.S. Constitution has not been trumped, abrogated, or implicitly repealed by the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment nor the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. These arguments are the same ones used by Obama’s lawyers in fending off the legitimate challenges to Barack Obama’s candidacy and presidency; by the secretaries of state to refute ballot challenges, and by the media, pundits, Congress and the academics to cover up the usurpation of the presidency by Obama/Soetoro. Of course, the corrupt SCOTUS hears nothing, sees nothing, and says nothing.
Obama and his supporters, the Congressional eligibility deniers, and the media have been soundly defeated and Obama is still ineligible to hold or run for the office he seeks. What is more interesting is that the legal rulings lend support to the charges of misprision of felony that all members of Congress, and all the secretaries of state face in contributing to the overthrow of the White House.
This article briefly reviews the history of this case and its rulings.
The FEC Filing
Hassan, a Guyana-born naturalized American citizen, filed papers with the Federal Election Commission to run for the presidency. Astoundingly, the FEC ruled in September 2011 that Hassan could file papers and raise money to run for president of the United States:
But the agency also told the prospective candidate, Abdul Hassan, that his campaign may not receive federal matching funds because he was not born in America. However, the agency’s decision stopped short of addressing the constitutional issue of whether someone born outside the United States can be president.
Importantly, the FEC made clear that it was outside it’s jurisdiction to decide the constitutional merits of Mr. Hassan’s candidacy, saying that vetting was up to the States:
“This does not mean that he can go and say ‘look the FEC has said that I am a candidate, give me money, I’m official,’” said Republican Commissioner Donald McGahn. “That is not what we do here; we don’t certify you as a candidate. That’s what the states do.” (emphasis added)
Democratic FEC Commissioners had ‘trepidation’ in issuing this unanimous opinion because of how it might be perceived. They attempted to qualify and explain their rationale:
“By saying that it is okay — it does give the impression that we don’t see a problem,” said Democratic Commissioner Steven Walther. “I think that we really need to be cognizant of how this could be misconstrued.”
To address this problem, one of the final sections added to approved opinion states:
“Notwithstanding this conclusion, the Commission expresses no opinion on Mr. Hassan’s potential liability arising out of his proposed activities under any other Federal or State law, including any laws concerning fraudulent misrepresentation. Any such issues are outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.”
“For us this is really all about what we are empowered to decide and what we are not empowered to decide,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “Nobody is saying that it is fine and nobody is saying it’s okay for this guy to be going out and raising funds.’”
Ballot Access Denied in Colorado, New Hampshire
Hassan then proceeded to set up a website and attempted to get on the ballot in New Hampshire and Colorado. When denied access by both Secretaries of State of each state, he sued. He has filed five lawsuits which argued that:
… the Constitution’s natural-born-citizen requirement is a vestige of our less noble past, before we decided that discrimination based on national origin is a grievous wrong. (He points in his briefs to Dred Scott v. Sandford.)The lawsuits say the Constitution’s admonition that “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Hassan initiated other lawsuits aimed at the natural born citizen requirement based on these assumptions, and filed against the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act (26 U.S.C. §§ 9001-9013) which provides public funding to Presidential nominees of major or minor political parties after the FEC issued an advisory opinion that Hassan did not qualify for any matching funding because he was not a natural born citizen. Hassan argues that the Presidential Campaign Fund Act is:
(1) unconstitutional and invalid, and (2) the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution1 is irreconcilable with, and has been“trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Now this is where it gets interesting. The FEC as defendant submitted a motion to dismiss the case based on the same premises that have been used to try to defeat challenges to Obama’s eligibility. That is,
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (emphasis added)
The FEC also argued that Defendant argued that this Court should deny Plaintiff’s Application because
the Complaint fails to present an Article III case or controversy, and alternatively, because it does not present a substantial constitutional question. (emphasis added)
The government moved to dismiss the case–using the same arguments it has used to dismiss other cases against Obama–(1) failure to present a claim upon which relief can be granted, (2) lack of jurisdiction, (3) failing to present an Article III case or controversy, and (4) failure to present a substantial constitutional question.
The one argument missing from the government’s defense? STANDING.
American Jurisprudence and Constitutional Legal Thinking
The DC circuit court dismissed Abdul Hassan’s case. The judge’s ruling denying Abdul Hassans suit against the FEC is illustrative for the process the Judge followed in making its conclusions. As opposed to ducking jurisdiction and ducking its Article III responsibility to hear cases involving constitutional questions, the court determined:
Because subject matter jurisdiction focuses on the court’s power to hear the claim, however, the court must give the plaintiff’s factual allegations closer scrutiny when resolving a Rule 12(b)(1) motion than would be required for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Thus, to determine whether it has jurisdiction over a claim, the court may consider materials outside the pleadings where necessary to resolve disputed jurisdictional facts. Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C. Cir. 1992). (emphasis added)
Regarding FRCP Rule 12 (b), the court determined:
A court need not, however, “accept inferences drawn by plaintiffs if such inferences are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint. Nor must the court accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.” Id. In addition,“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” (emphasis added)
In other words, the Court actually took on the issue, was legally entitled to review additional information, and ruled it did not have to accept inferences or ‘legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations’. Every one of the Obama challenge cases was thrown out first, on standing, and second, using the measly excuses such as failure to present a case, lack of Article III jurisdiction, or the ‘political question’.
Article II Still Stands
I hope everyone who has been involved in the eligibility movement can appreciate the significance of these rulings for the Constitution, the requirements of the Presidency, and all the work we have accomplished over the last several years. It is critical to inform your friends who are skeptical of the ‘birthers’ or disappointed in the perceived failure of the 100+ cases challenging Obama that several courts have affirmed the natural born citizen requirement of the presidency–that it still stands, and that we are right and always have been on this issue.
Significantly the FEC believes the States are responsible for the determination of eligibility, just as the Article II Superpac, the Obama Ballot Challenge, the extensive legal work of many scholars, and many, many others have indicated. The 2009 Continental Congress recommended vetting laws at the state level were required, and the Article II Superpac will continue its efforts after this election and into 2013 to ensure a vetting process is in place at multiple levels, to make sure the usurpation of the White House by an unknown, unvetted foreign national never happens again.
Please donate to the Article II Superpac to ensure its efforts continue through and beyond the 2012 election. The national security of our Nation is at stake.
h/t Article II Superpac, Obama Release Your Records
“Voices Without A Vote” is a short ad featuring the generation of kids who will be inheriting the Obama mess in years to come. It is very well done with a powerful message any and all should hear prior to November 6. It’s already been viewed by 300,785 people. Let’s help it get to a million by passing it onto our networks.
On January 5, 2012, Dean Haskins, Director of the former Birther Summit, wrote an article titled “Update on New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Virginia Sunahara’s Brother, Duncan Sunahara.” This week Article II Super PAC ran an ad in the Washington Times Weekly and Daily to draw people’s attention to Hawaii’s Deputy Attorney General, Jill Nagamine, using, some suggest abusing, her power by blocking the Sunahara family from securing baby Virginia’s original Hawai’ian long-form birth certificate and by extension ALL Hawai’an’s original birth records. Why the State of Hawaii is fighting this extremely simple request spending thousands of taxpayer’s funds is beyond our ability to even make a guess. Rather, we find it disturbing that the brother of a baby who died over 50 years ago can’t secure her original birth certificate. Think about that…hhhmmm….50 years ago.
If you missed Monday’s Tea Party Power Hour radio show be sure to check out the podcast by clicking http://www.art2superpac.com/radioshow.html . Monday’s guest was Paul Kengor, Ph.D. author of “The Communist – Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor”
FULL ARTICLE II SUPER PAC UPDATE HERE.
**Help the Article II Superpac get these ads into newspapers in the swing states and in front of the electoral college**
Donate Donate Donate Donate
Now that the fraudulent “Arab Spring” has turned into openly whipped up rage and hatred against America and the West, our liberals are still in denial. Their power, their privileges, their huge vanity is at stake. That is why they are desperately trying to fool millions of Americans for the next two months. Expect two solid months of Big Lies. ~Denial is Now National Suicide
Obama’s hatred of America was so clear from the beginning that people like me began writing about him trying to understand why he hated the U.S., when for all intents and purposes, he has benefited greatly from all the United States has to offer–education, opportunity, scholarships, book offers…he and his Wookie
beard wife both received law degrees from prestigious universities, only to give them up before being forced to lose them over lies and fraud. His campaign was hateful then and is now, with racist, bigoted, elitist core themes, skullduggery, and thuggish tactics that bring to mind the Chicago Mob on cocaine and steroids.
Blaming others is what liberals do best. It is a sign of desperation, of the breakdown of an ideology that is no longer believed even by its own priesthood. Liberals live near panic because their beliefs are crumbling. Let’s give them a little push. The life you save may be your country’s.
As the DNC takes off without Obama, the empty chair…
Article II activists are busy letting everyone know that the Democrats have a problem, and so will every secretary of state if they certify Obama as eligible to be placed on their state’s ballot. Misprision of Felony is in everyone’s future, notwithstanding the poor job the judiciary did in ‘protecting’ Obama by violating the law.
The Article II SuperPac sent its CPD letter out early this week, followed by another terrific full page ad in the Washington Times. Meanwhile, attorney Larry Klayman sent a letter to Bob Bauer–Obama’s forger in chief–warning him of certifying Obama as eligible when there is no proof that he is…suggesting that charges of election fraud are forthcoming. And the Patriot’s Union has a great initiative underway that everyone can participate in…
And while you’re at it letting everyone know about Obama’s Achilles Heel, take a moment to caption this photo!
Open thread! :smile:
The fundamental election fraud committed by the Democratic Party and the Democratic National Convention in 2008 is documented in the nomination papers submitted to every Secretary of State. In 2008 Nancy Pelosi swore that Obama met the constitutional requirements for the Presidency when he did not. After the nomination convention, then-Chair of the DNC Pelosi certified to the States that Obama was duly nominated the office as specified by the Democratic Party with the exception of Hawaii, where Nancy Pelosi swore that that Obama was constitutionally eligible–i.e., a natural born citizen.
The Democrats will commit the same kind of fraud in 2012 after the nomination of Barack Obama when Debbie Wasserman-Schultz in her private capacity as Chair of the DNC, a private club, certifies to every state that Obama is constitutionally qualified for the Presidency. This will happen in early September, and at that point DWS commits the same fraud as Pelosi did in 2008 on the SoS of your state, which is a prosecutable crime. Follow the paperwork.
Next up in the Obama ballot challenges is Florida’s case Voeltz v. Obama set for hearings on June 18 on the defendants move to dismiss the case. Voeltz advances the ballot challenges on an important front challenging the authority of the Democratic Party to defraud the citizens of Florida by fraudulently advancing Obama’s name on the ballot. Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been subpoenaed to appear.
The Voeltz v Obama case is finally getting its first day in court Monday, June 18. Like all such cases, it challenges the right of the man who calls himself “Barack Hussein Obama” to be on the state ballot, because he hasn’t established that he is a natural born Citizen. The U.S. Constitution and Florida law require that, although they don’t specify how that is to be verified.
Florida is a must-win “swing state” for “Obama.” If he is not on the ballot, he simply cannot win. If he is successfully challenged here, or even nearly-successfully, it will create a host of problems in other states. Win or lose, millions will learn that they have been lied to– by the Democrats, Republicans, media, causing mass revulsion and rejection of Obama and any Democrats foolish enough to be closely identified with him.
Win or lose, these ballot challenges are important for the public education and the attention it provides. The more the courts ignore the issue and the media fail to cover Obama’s lack of Constitutional eligibility, the more they are exposed as complicit and demonstrate their unworthiness to hold any position of public trust. The more attention raised in key states the more each of those states’ Senators and Congressmen
have cover for are obligated to object to the certification of electoral votes come the joint session of Congress on January 9, 2013.
Of political parties or factions George Washington warned, citing in his farewell address :
However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.
Corruption is an equal opportunity player in today’s charade of the republicans v democrats. As the “old democratic party” witnessed its hijack in 2008 by the extreme left and other interests, so too are the GOP rank and file witnessing and challenging the republican establishment’s hijack of binding delegates to the establishment choice at the Republican Convention. How far will the establishment republicans go?
It will be a fatal blow to the republicans if they choose a constitutionally ineligible candidate for the Vice Presidency…both parties are then officially
dead adverse to the Constitution. None of the information or evidence on Obama is going away, and options for prosecuting Obama while he is in and after he is out of office still exist, with more information developed every day. There are no more rugs to sweep this under. That is why we can continue to expect many false flags this summer from the Obama regime.
The more Obama/Soetoro is exposed and his criminal activities revealed, the more desperate the diversion tactics will become. The murders already completed have already rather blatantly revealed their hand and identity; any more will just confirm the information and further expose the network.
“Set against the background of epic dislocation in the financial markets and a supine media, ADMIT THE HORSE is a political thriller about a dark-horse political candidate whose meteoric rise to the pinnacle of power is engineered amidst illegal campaign contributions, voter fraud, and murder –“
:shock: My eyes popped open when I read the jacket description of this recently published book written by Paula Abeles, a host of the popular Sins of Omission BTR show at No Quarter. Readers here know that the iniquity of the assault upon our beloved America would also make a great novel…that would unfortunately be based on the truth. :shock:
Based upon actual documented events during the 2008 presidential election, the author provides a riveting written documentary of key threads of what we witnessed in the ‘election’ of 2008, and what has since been confirmed as we move toward the 2012 election. The book makes good reading and is a page-turner. Revolution Radio recently hosted author Paula Abeles and the archive of the show is HERE.
This book gives me a sense of gratitude for the understanding of the thing we called it back then. Those of us who love liberty knew that one candidate had the protection and assistance of something far greater than the man himself, and these pages have certainly discussed what those powers might be. There was indeed a Trojan Horse at the door. In novel style, Abeles describes how the horse was admitted. The characters include:
…a detective, retired DEA Investigator, an idealistic venture capitalist, an African-American congresswoman, and a suburban mom volunteering for his opponent.
Join us on Revolution Radio for an exciting discussion and review of this book, and the implications of our tasks going forward in 2012. Please post any questions you might have for the author in comments! :smile:
This thread is dedicated to the remembrance of those events and people, and to the remedy which will make America renew and be anew in God’s eyes as we have answered that call. Then, Open Thread !
PSST Democrats…throw Obama under the bus now and get another candidate.
Now we find more obvious proof of Obama’s deception all along: ‘born in Kenya, raised in Indonesia and Hawaii”. In true Mockingbird fashion, this shifts the discussion again to place of birth. Lest you believe the White House denial that Obama never saw this, or that his agent was exaggerating to make his story look exotic, take a look at this interview with Jack Cashill (h/t Troy)
So, did he lie about being born in Kenya or being born in Hawaii? Will he pull a ‘gee, my mommy never told me’ trick? Did he simply forget to change his name? Will Hawaii produce anything available for forensic examination? And what about this theory?
What is a
self-respecting self-delusioned democrat to do?
The more perplexing question is, will this finally awaken Americans to alarm, thought or action?
Obama is the worst of those who take advantage of everything America has to offer–including scholarships to good schools, preferential placement in key positions due to affirmative action and not merit, walking inside the halls of political power…and turned around and bit the hand that fed him. He is shameless in his denigration of America.
Since most of the world knows that Osama Bin Ladin was already dead before Obama killed him again, and his death kept a secret for some ‘future use’ when needed by a politician, it behooves us to discuss the significance of his death and its use by the politicos who love sending other people’s children off to war to get their legs blown off. (h/t SLA)
Let’s revisit why we know Bin Ladin was already dead by the time Obama claimed to kill his corpse again. First, George W Bush gave it away in 2004 when he suddenly switched from “Wanted, Dead or Alive” to “I’m really not that concerned about Osama anymore”.
Notice his body language, the blinking eyes, the failure to make eye contact, and the twisted mouth…all indicators that he is lying. And, if Bush wasn’t that concerned about him anymore, why did he keep our soldiers in Afghanistan fighting and dying for nothing? Bin Ladin was used as a pretext for passing the Patriot Act, the war in Iraq, and the development of the Department of Homeland Security and expansion of the government’s spying powers. These wars were an excuse the drain the U.S. treasury of taxpayer dollars, too,necessitating more government borrowing and spending. All this time, Bush and Congress kept up the foreign aid to those who supported our enemies.
Since Al Queda was created by the CIA and was still useful as a bogeyman, remember in 2004 Bush had to release another fake tape of Bin Ladin threating America in order to ‘win’ the election against John Kerry–himself cheating against Bush while being outed as a totally false Vietnam medal-winner. I remember many suggesting the ‘American Al Queda’ actually looked like Karl Rove…certainly it was a Karl Rove scheme aided and abetted by Osama’s creators, the CIA. The new bogeyman was Saddam Hussein…as America moved money and soldiers to Iraq and forgot about Afghanistan.
Here are the coalition deaths by year in Afghanistan. Notice the number of deaths have increased dramatically since Bush said ‘he didn’t care about Osama’, and even more dramatically since Obama took office.
The number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq since 2003 is 4,480…in 2003 486 soldiers lost their lives and in 2007, 904 lost their lives. Bush and Cheney lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the United States spent billions and lost hundreds of millions of dollars there.
So much for the anti-war left.
2007 Bhutto Video
Before she was murdered, Benazir Bhutto also asserted that Bin Ladin was killed in 2003 and buried in an unmarked grave:
Is this one of the reasons she was murdered?
The Hoax, Again.
Flagging in the polls and forced to release a hastily forged birth certificate, Obama had no choice to play the Osama card. He probably needed permission from daddy Bush to do so, who was hoping to save it for use by Jebbie Bush as a ploy to steal the 2012 election. But the story, matched by an already-in-waiting ‘public demonstration’ of gleeful murder in front of the White House that evening, was another hoax. To wit:
Merely a week after
PresidentObama announced the death of Osama Bin Laden, there is literally a deluge of evidence that clearly indicates the whole episode has been manufactured for political gain and to return Americans to a state of post-9/11 intellectual castration so that they can be easily manipulated in the run up to the 2012 election. Here are ten facts that prove the Bin Laden fable is a contrived hoax….
1) Before last Sunday’s raid, every intelligence analyst, geopolitical commentator or head of state worth their salt was on record as stating that Osama Bin Laden was already dead, and that he probably died many years ago, from veteran CIA officer Robert Baer, to former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, to former FBI head of counterterrorism Dale Watson. In addition, back in 2002 Alex Jones was told directly by two separate high level sources that Bin Laden was already dead and that his death would be announced at the most politically opportune moment. Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under five different Presidents, serving as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under the Nixon, Ford and Carter, told the Alex Jones Show last week that Bin Laden died of marfan syndrome shortly after he was visited by CIA physicians at the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001.
2) The official narrative of how the raid unfolded completely collapsed within days of its announcement. First there had been a 40 minute shootout, then there was no shootout and just one man was armed, first Bin Laden was armed then he was not, first Bin Laden used his wife as a human shield and then he did not. First the compound was described as a “$1 million dollar mansion” then it turned out to be a rubbish-strewn dilapidated compound that was worth less than a quarter of that. Almost every single aspect of the official narrative has changed since Obama first described the raid last Sunday as the White House struggles to keep its story straight.
3) The alleged body of Bin Laden was hastily dumped in the sea to prevent any proper procedure of identification. The White House claimed this was in accordance with normal Islamic burial rituals, however numerous Muslim scholars all over the globe disputed this claim, pointing out that Muslims can only be buried at sea if they die at sea. While the White House claimed that Bin Laden’s death on May 1st was proven by DNA and facial recognition evidence, such proof was never released for public scrutiny and the Obama administration refused to release photos of Bin Laden’s dead body, suggesting a cover-up.
4) Despite the fact that the White House released “situation room” photos which purported to show Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and the rest of Obama’s security staff watching the raid which killed Bin Laden live, it was later admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that Obama could not have seen the raid because the live feed was cut off before the Navy SEALS entered the compound. The photos were described by many as having “historical significance,” forming a “captivating” record of Obama’s greatest success and being the “defining moment” of his Presidency. One image showed Hillary Clinton with her hand over her mouth as if witnessing an anxious or crucial moment in the raid. Media reports at the time claimed that the photos represented the moment when “The leader of the free world saw the terror chief shot in the left eye.” However, the photos were staged as a PR stunt for public consumption, nobody in the photos ever saw Bin Laden killed live, nor did they see the Navy SEALS even enter the compound.
5) As even mainstream journalists began to cast suspicion on the official narrative behind the raid, the media reported that Al-Qaeda itself had confirmed every detail of Obama’s address the the nation. However, the conduit for such a claim was in fact an organization called SITE, which is a notorious Pentagon propaganda front run by the daughter of an Israeli spy that has been caught on numerous occasions releasing fake cartoonish “Al-Qaeda” videos at the most politically expedient times for both the Bush and Obama administrations. The SITE organization is nothing more than a contractor for the U.S. government, receiving some $500,000 a year annually from Uncle Sam, and yet the corporate media instantly swallowed and regurgitated the claim that “Al-Qaeda” had confirmed the official story after SITE directed them to an anonymous posting on an Islamic website.
6) Almost every single neighbor that lived near the alleged Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad that was interviewed by news reporters said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there. Since the town is a staging ground for the Pakistani military, which has a training facility situated virtually a stone’s throw away from the alleged Bin Laden compound, residents were required to show ID when they moved into the area. Pakistani troops and anti-terror police in the town refused to confirm that Bin Laden had lived in the house. Barack Obama himself admitted to 60 Minutes that the White House was only 55/45 sure that Osama lived there before the raid and this uncertainty prompted concerns that the US Navy SEALS sent in could have targeted a “prince from Dubai” or some other individual that was not Bin Laden.
7) The videos released by the White House this past weekend which purport to show Osama Bin Laden making Al-Qaeda tapes in October-November 2010 are almost identical to footage first released by Pentagon front group SITE nearly four years ago. Remember, a May 2010 Washington Post story reported how the CIA had admitted to making fake Bin Laden videos. Despite the White House’s insistence that the footage of Bin Laden is recent, he looks younger and healthier than tapes released almost a decade ago, having apparently dyed his beard black. A separate video that purports to show Bin Laden in his compound flicking through satellite TV channels depicts a much older looking man with a gray beard. Analysts have pointed out that the man has different shaped ears to real Osama pictures from back in 2001. A doctor has also pointed out the fact that the man in the tapes released Saturday has no problem moving his left arm, whereas video from 2001 clearly illustrates how Bin Laden was unable to move his left upper extremity because of a permanent injury probably related to damage to the peripheral nerves. Why the cameraman would film the back of Bin Laden’s head as he watches television is also dubious. Residents in the town of Abbottabad claim the man in the “television” video is not Osama, with one individual claiming that the man labeled by the White House as being Bin Laden is actually his neighbor, a man named Akhbar Han.
The Navy Seals who accomplished the raid on someone in Pakistan were murdered to hide the evidence, just as the body was dropped into the ocean.
The Usurper’s Re-Election Strategy
After safely instigating black on white murderous rampages across the country, and his OWS spring assault, Obama sneaks into Afghanistan to both brag about Bin Ladin’s death and to announce an ‘end to the Afghanistan war’. Obama releases a commercial trying to reap the credit for whatever operation was used to kill Bin Ladin’s corpse..Romney crys ‘foul’–when they all know Osama was already dead. (note: Betcha Mitt wanted to use Osama for himself, or save it when he was in political trouble. Sorry mittens, that card has been played.) This after months of Obama trashing our soldiers, tying their hands behind their backs so they can’t win the war, and despising America in the usual fashion. Obama tries to claim credit as ‘the most important moment in my lifetime’ for killing Bin Ladin’s corpse.
Now Obama “pledges‘ (wink wink oink oink) to end the war in Afghanistan, already having promised that in 2008…he was against the war before he was for it.
Political Advantages of Keeping Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
There are many reasons Obama, Bush and Congress have betrayed and killed Americans in these so called ‘wars’, which were never legal wars. In fact, too many reasons to list here…but I can think of a few:
Well Mr. Usurper, we are not fooled and see right through your transparent effort to boost your flagging, failing self and your utter stupidity in blowing wide open the NWO plans for our demise. And Dick Morris, by the way, is trying to convince republicans to stay home and not vote because ‘obama will lose in a landslide’. Yeah right… we know you are covering because Obama has to flip 30-40 million votes to win, which when he does, you republicans can blame it on the people staying home and not voting. Yawn. :roll:
Obama’s hit list is a mile long and growing every day. He just wants to chalk up all of America in his column, and plans on a second term to do us in. We wait your next move, but you won’t know ours.
There are more than enough factors to suggest that Republicans will lose handily to Obama in the upcoming presidential election. Here are just a few:
How many actually believe Romney will win? Clearly these guys don’t:
Better watch out. A Gideon strategy may come around and bite you in the butt.
The race card is a distraction. And it looks like they’ve succeeded, again.
Cruising the internet in the last few days there are hundreds of articles on Trayvon Martin case, interracial violence, the history of racial relations in the United States,and the general level of violence existing in America. This blog also took the time to discuss black-on-black violence.
If there was one article that knocked me back out of this focus on race, it was American Thinker’s article on Obama and the End of the Progressive Era, spurring conversations with friends reminding me of the distractions the left always provides to hide their true agenda. While everyone is talking about the race card failing, and it being worn out, it actually has successfully diverted our attention again.
So what don’t they want us to focus on?
The Anti-Christ Exposed
Don’t forget that all of this is trying to hide the fact that ‘anti-christ’ thinking has been exposed–in the luciferian bankers and politicians, the ‘left’, the muslims, the ‘progressives’, and all those lying wonders we have been warned about. It may not be one individual at all, but a whole way of being mastered by multiple entities and individuals. Which means we are completely vulnerable to deception by great ‘lying wonders’ produced by all of them–earthquakes, storms, tornadoes, even UFO’s–a Nazi technology.
All roads still lead back to Rome, the Jesuits, and the luciferian army which is having a field day with our confusion. It is intentional.
What else are we missing and not supposed to see?
For many people, there are no coincidences, only patterns of actions that betray the larger picture. I must say that since beginning this blog in August 2009 I have come to see it all as a pattern, with no coincidence; the trouble has been deciphering the pattern, or which pattern is playing. And how they combine or are separate.
There is a much larger evil that has become evident in the usurpation of the presidency by Hussein-Obama-Soetoro-Soebarkha. It is not just a usurpation, but it is the culmination of centuries of world domination sought by the privileged few. And even that large pattern has its umbrella in the works of satan to pollute and destroy God’s children, God’s world. Confusion reigns as does darkness.
The tip of the spear which sparked my development was the anointment of Obama as pResident of the U.S. in 2009, and all the criminality that led up to it. As we peeled back the layers of this bad dog, we found the larger sinister forces at work conspiring for world control. We stumbled across the connections with the federal reserve; past assassinations, with the World Trade Center attacks in 1993 and 2001; with Carter, Brzezinski, Kissinger, Nixon, the Clintons, the Bush clan–all just investigating the usurpation of the presidency by Hussein-Obama.
As it turns out, the usurpation was planned long ago; the powers that be were just waiting for the moment when Americans would be so dumbed down and exhausted that we would vote for Obama ‘to prove we were not racist’. In my opinion, they waited too long to install ‘the black guy’, as America had moved past racism a long time ago. Oh yes the race card worked for a while, but it did not deter true Americans from seeking the truth about Obama-Hussein. For each time we get close to the full exposure of this agent of terror, something terrifying happens to Americans or America. To wit:
The luciferians behind this destruction never expected Americans to figure this out, and each murder, assassination, worldly diversion is designed to keep us from focusing on the illegality of Obama…the one place where removing the person would expose the whole conspiracy against America and the world. Our constitution specifies who can be in that office of the president, and we have no legitimate president right now. The millions in bribes, threats, the sacrificing of our entire worth…has followed his usurpation. That’s a lot of work, money, and blood invested in keeping the illusion alive.
Satan is the god of confusion and liars.
If any of us on this blog or others that focus on Obama’s destruction and identity are taken out, you know where to look.
The Chief Carnival Barker, Barrack Hussein Soetoro Soebarka Obama talks about what a distraction it is to focus on the fact that he has no legal identity in the United States. So much of a distraction it prevents him from completely annihilating our country as quickly as he wants to.
This classic video was re-released by the White House on March 1, 2012, the day Sheriff Joe Arapio’s law enforcement investigation proved what Carnival Barky has been afraid of all along:
Hence, Obama’s nominating petition in each and every state is defective
Hence, Obama has not proven he is an Article II ‘natural born citizen’ because he has not proven place of birth and citizen parents.
In each and every county, and in each and every state, the papers that the Democrats are putting forward–and Obama is signing–that proffer him as the candidate of the Party are defective. The Democrats are committing fraud in each state right now. These are very simple points to hammer on, and now you have law enforcement to back you up. What about the Sheriffs in your county…do they have the courage to stand up for the Constitution and to actually live their oath of office?
Head on down to your local democrat party office with a few signs letting them know you know they are committing fraud. Write a few letters to the editor with these simple facts. Put out a flyer or postcard, a poster or road sign: its time to challenge them on every single corner of every street in this nation. If you can’t do that, support the Obama Ballot Challenge and the educational efforts of the Article II SuperPac. Yes, its been a long road, and yes, we’re asking again for your support.
Create the record so that all of history and time, and our Creator will know, that we opposed the usurpation of the United States Constitution by the jackals, jackasses, and carnival barkers of the left wing sociopathic communist new world
order odors of the 20th and 21st Centuries.
Update on Arizona Ballot Challenge
Plaintiff in the Pima County Ballot Challenge, Kenneth Allen, submitted a brief in opposition to the Arizona Democrat party’s motion to dismiss his challenge that is sure to make headlines and has already made the democrats steaming mad…so mad they have moved to strike the brief itself. While it is expected that the judge in the case will dismiss it as all others before him, it is worth reviewing the standard democrat arguments and Plaintiff Allen’s challenges to them so as to ‘try your hand’ at using these arguments yourself.
Plaintiff Allen’s introduction to his argument opposing defendant AZDems motion to dismiss:
Comes now Plaintiff Kenneth L. Allen in opposition to Defendant Arizona Democratic Party (“the Party”) Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that Defendant cannot guarantee to the Plaintiff nor the citizens of Pima County that it will not commit fraud as it certifies that candidate Barack H. Obama is constitutionally eligible for the office of President of the United States.
Typically, the democrats cite disparagingly the “49 cases that have been dismissed resolving forever the discussion the Obama’s eligibility:
Exhibit A (listing 49 federal cases and 3S state cases rejecting arguments made by “birthers” in one form or another. Motion to Dismiss, Az Democrats
Plaintiff Allen’s response:
VII. Defendants Erroneously Rely on Case Law that is Irrelevant to this Complaint.
Defendants, in a footnote (fn3 p 2), erroneously claim that candidate Obama’s eligibility for president has been addressed already by a series of cases across the country, cases which have never argued the merits of candidate Obama’s status as a natural born citizen, and cases which have never addressed specifically a ballot challenge. Defendants compare apples to oranges. Contrary to Defendants haughty claim, there is no legal authority or court in the country that has ruled on or definitively stated that candidate Obama meets the constitutional qualifications for the presidency
Defendants proffer Obama’s birth certificate released by the White House as proof positive of Obama’s birth in the United States, making it a central part of the case. Plaintiff Allen’s response:
VIII. Defendants “Make Up” a Definition of Natural Born Citizen that Conflicts with Existing Case Law, cannot be supported by the facts and Cite No legal authority for their Definition.
While erroneously relying on case law that does not address the merits of the definition of natural born citizen, Defendants make up a definition by stating that candidate Obama is a ‘natural born citizen’ because he was born in the United States (Hawaii) to an American citizen mother, that is, a single citizen parent (Defendants at 2, 1-7). Defendants proffer Exhibit A, a purported copy of candidate Obama’s birth certificate, as proof of his birth in the United States.
Plaintiff asks this Court to take judicial notice of the March 1, 2012 findings of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio which state that there is probable cause that the Hawaii birth certificate proffered as evidence that candidate Obama was born in the United States to a U.S. citizen mother is a forgery and thus a fraudulent document . Defendants cannot definitively state that candidate Obama was born anywhere in the United States, which is just one of the characteristics of a natural born citizen.
Defendants also erroneously interpret Minor v Happersett and include the Fourteenth Amendment as necessary to the discussion of the term natural born citizen (fn6 p 5). The Fourteenth Amendment is not relevant to the discussion of natural born citizen as it concerns only the requirements to be a citizen of the United States; did not refer to or modify Article II; and never once mentions ‘natural born citizen’.
The purported Birth Certificate of candidate Obama (Exhibit (A) has been proven to be fraudulent through investigation of Sheriff Joe Arapaio. Because the defendants have brought the argument about the birth certificate here they should provide all documents for inspection and have made this issue relevant in this case.
The Arizona Democrats step in the pile big time…making up out of thin air their own definition of natural born citizen, and relying on fraudulent documents to do so. They also erroneously try to use the case of Wong Kim Ark–long a standard bulwark of the flat-earth eligibility deniers–and the Fourteenth Amendment to argue for the illegitimate Carnival Barky:
XII. Defendants Erroneously suggest the Fourteenth Amendment grants ‘natural born citizen’ status to candidate Obama.
Defendant erroneously focuses on the case of Wong Kim Ark (69 U.S. 649 (1898)) and the term ‘citizen’, failing to recognize that the case is completely separate from and did not decide that Wong Kim Ark was a ‘natural born citizen’. Wong Kim Ark became a citizen, not a natural born citizen, of the United States. Defendants also claim that candidate Obama is a natural born citizen based on his birth in the United States, a statement that is now without merit in light of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arapio’s report (id note 2).
 Wong Kim Ark’s children would be natural born citizens of the United States if Wong Kim Ark married an American citizen.
Finishing the party off in grand style, Plaintiff Allen reasonably concludes:
Because Defendant cannot prove that candidate Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States as required by the Constitution, and cannot prove he was born in the United States, this case should proceed on the merits of the questions initially asked of this Court. Absent this case, Defendant is likely to commit fraud on this Plaintiff, the citizens of Pima County, state and county officials of Arizona, and the citizens of Arizona by failing to conclusively validate the Party’s candidate for the president.
It is important to note for this case, as probably in others, the Democrats argue that they have exclusive privilege to select their candidate for president–irrespective of whether that candidate is eligible or not. In this case, the Democrats argued that even with that right, the Plaintiff should bring in all other counties in Arizona to the dispute. Challenging their authority, the Plaintiff retorts:
IX. Defendants claim a right to choose the Party’s candidate—irrespective of qualifications—to place on the Arizona ballot.
Defendants ask this Court to dismiss this ballot challenge because it has the right to choose the Party’s candidate whether it has proof of the candidate’s eligibility or not. By stating this, the Party represents that it is representing candidate Obama’s efforts to secure a place on the Arizona ballot. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s motion to dismiss because Plaintiff does not believe that the Party has a right to defraud the citizens of Arizona by putting forth a candidate that does not meet the qualifications of the office sought. Defendants have offered no proof of candidate Obama’s constitutional qualifications for the office, rely on patently fraudulent documentation (fn 5 p 5), and demonstrate disrespect of the Plaintiff and the voters of Arizona who have a right to vote for a constitutionally eligible candidate. Defendants also demonstrate spurious disrespect for Constitution of the United States (fn 3, 4 p 2).
What the Plaintiff is pointing out to all of us is how much information we have already and that we don’t need to be lawyers to start taking them on. This is a citizen complaint, written by ordinary citizens. Get copies of these documents from the Obama Ballot Challenge site, there is a lot of good material to use in your own letters and documents. You will be well-versed in how the democrats use smoke and mirrors to deceive, and how to break them into so many shards of glass.
The long-awaited report by Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Obutt’s lack of eligibility will be broadcast live for your viewing on Thursday, March 1, 2012 beginning at 3 pm EST. World Net Daily will be offering a free copy of the report, sign up below!
ARTICLE II SUPER PAC AND THE WESTERN CENTER FOR JOURNALISM IS CO-SPONSORING WORLD NET DAILY’S (WND) LIVESTREAM OF MARICOPA COUNTY COLD CASE POSSE INVESTIGATION INTO BARACK H. OBAMA
Phoenix, Ariz – Article II Super PAC is joining World Net Daily (WND) and the Western Center for Journalism to live stream the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Investigative Report of Barack H. Obama initiated following a request from Tea Party members from Surprise, Arizona. The Maricopa County Cold Case Posse is made up of retired career law enforcement officials, legal professionals and skilled investigators.
The seven month long investigative report will be released to the public on March 1, 2012 and Vattelevision, Article II Super PAC’s multi-media team, will be working with WND to bring it “live” to the citizens throughout America and the world.
WND will be providing an Executive Summary of the report and to be certain to receive it we encourage people to go to WND and sign up.
Helen Tansey, Director of Article II Super PAC said “We are thrilled to be joining WND, America’s leading independent news source who has stayed on top of this story and kept all of us readers informed since the investigation first launched.”
Tansey went onto say “no official source ever vetted Obama prior to the 2008 election, but just a mere political party. Well, that’s not good enough. The people deserve to know those who are seeking access to our ballots meet the qualifications laid out under Article II of the US Constitution, and for the first time an official law enforcement entity is doing what should have been done long ago.”
The WND TV live-streaming event is also made possible through the support of the Western Center for Journalism and Article II Super PAC.
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. Title 18 U.S.C. § 4
Reporting on the Obama Ballot Challenges across the nation and in Arizona specifically, in each and every instance the Democrat Party has been served with summons’ and complaints by the various elector-plaintiffs who have challenged Obama’s right to be on their state’s ballot. And in each and every state; in every town and city where the Democrats operate, they are actively perpetuating fraud upon the citizens of their state by falsely pushing Obama’s name onto the ballot.
For the record, Obama is not a natural born citizen due to his father’s citizenship and foreign allegiance, and is at best a dual citizen; Obama has also failed to prove conclusively that he was born in the United States. Finally, Obama has failed to provide evidence of his repatriation to the United States or evidence of a legal name change after his adoption by an Indonesian citizen. His legal identity as Barack Hussein Obama is what his hat-hangs on.
The state of Arizona accepted as true the false sworn statements by Obama and thereafter placed his name on the ballots. He was then elected President. The voters in Arizona were directly defrauded by Obama’s false affirmations.
When Obama swore he was eligible, he lied. He didn’t swear that he might be eligible or that there was a good chance he would be found eligible. He swore that he was – in fact – eligible. Obama’s certain affirmations under oath and penalty of perjury are false. He could not have been certain and he should not have sworn that he was. He’s guilty of false swearing despite whatever definition of natural-born citizen comes down the pike.
Current DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Shultz promises to do the same to the American people–knowingly falsely certify Obama as constitutionally qualified for the party’s nomination. Swimming in bribery money or drowning in threats to life and limb, all the democrats who work for Obama and place him on the ballot, produce and distribute literature on his behalf are committing a crime.
And they should be told about it. Send them all a copy of Title 18 Section 4. And advise them to quit their jobs before they are all finally ensnared in conspiracy to defraud along with the chief Obutt and his repulsive ‘wife’–herself no stranger to false ids and social security numbers…Guadelupe and Harrison Bonnel, anyone?
Oh how the Democrats scream and yell when they are served with legal papers summoning their presence in a lawsuit challenging their Obutt’s name on the ballot. They run away, block your car from exiting the parking lot, or throw the papers on the floor. But there is no way they–the Democrat party’s subdivisions, officers and employees– will be able to avoid criminal charges for their participation in one of the greatest thefts and scams in United States history, second only to the FED and the Sixteenth Amendment.
In Pima County, Arizona, plaintiff Ken Allen recently filed a ballot challenge pursuant to Arizona regulations. The Democrat party was served, along with county officials and a status conference held on February 23, 2011. The Judge in the case was ‘not certain’ he had jurisdiction but when presented with evidence that he had, quickly granted leave to the plaintiff to file an amended complaint by March 1, 2012. The Democrat party, Pima County Attorney, Barack Hussein Obama, and others will be served and trial strategy is being planned. Remember, Obama has already lied to Arizonans once before, and we know he will do it again if the Democrats are complicit in submitting fraudulent documentation to the Arizona Secretary of State.
In the meantime ballot challenges in Pennsylvania, Florida, California, Indiana, Alaska, Illinois, Georgia, and several other states are continuing. In Georgia, plaintiff’s attorney has submitted a motion to suspend the Georgia primary election based on the egregious, arbitrary and capricious actions of Georgia’s SoS and “Judge” Malihi. Don’t forget that Georgia got two nuclear plants in exchange for the Judge and State officials’ betrayal of their citizens.
After the Georgia court’s decision, why not the militia?
Malihi is a traitor and has blatantly violated his OATH OF OFFICE, if you ever signed one. I call for his resignation from the bench. You are unworthy sir and have betrayed our constitution, our republic and the PEOPLE who are your employers. You are a de facto government agent, incapable of making an impartial finding of fact or determination of law…a disgrace. When a man is incapable of putting his own personal interest, even under duress, beneath that of his oath of office, then he must recuse or resign. You fail to do the first and now it is time you did the latter. (~h/t reader Tenacity)
As reader Troy points out, however, Malihi left the door wide open for the case to go up to the U.S. Supreme Court, knowingly or not. When it gets before SCOTUS, we do expect them to rule in the Obutt’s favor, because to do otherwise would convict Chief Justice Roberts of treason for knowingly swearing in a usurper. That will be our signal.
In 1789, Thomas Jefferson warned that the judiciary, if given too much power, might ruin our Republic and destroy our rights:
“…the Federal Judiciary: an irresponsible body, working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one…it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we are separated…”
Like Judge Carter, Judge Malihi woke up one recent morning with a bloody horse’s head in his bed, and decided to save his life and his paycheck instead of uphold the law and rule properly in favor of the Constitution for the united States of America. The state and citizens of Georgia were unmercifully threatened…and promised nuclear power plants (aka union jobs)….if….
Waking up to corruption in America is nothing new, and after years of battling the most corrupt administration in our history, led by a usurper, we find the judiciary, and the 99% of attorneys and law schools in this country, are corrupt to the core…intent upon destroying our republic. Appeals of course are possible, and I suppose if the GA Secretary of State has not found a horse head yet in his bed, he could ignore Malihi’s administrative ruling…but this is the power of a usurper and his accomplices to ruin our country.
If the source of your wealth and power has been a gullible public, you will not want someone interfering with your racket. Politicians are criminals who use deceit and deception to separate great numbers of people from their money and power. Bureaucrats are people who trade in their conscience for the security of a paycheck and benefits Beneficiaries of government are those who trade their votes for goodies promised by the politicians. The major media are the communicators who lie for a living.
The Militia are a threat to Obama and all those who gave us this $14 trillion dollar debt, over one hundred thousand dead in no-win Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan wars, Ruby Ridge, Waco, and the terrorist IHS, DHS, Department of Justice and the attacks of 911. Thinking Americans know those who believe political propaganda are the most dangerous people in the world.
At various show times over the next few weeks, drkates Revolution Radio will be reading excerpts from Red Beckman’s “Why the Militia”. These shows will likely be recorded at odd hours–due to my schedule–but will be available as archived material for your review.
With Red Beckman’s permission, Drkatesview is also pleased to offer “Why the Militia” at special discounted rates. A reader suggested that each of us adopt our local sheriffs and give them a copy of this book. If you are interested in purchasing a copy, kindly let me know in the comments or email me at email@example.com. Purchase prices are based on the number of books you buy, and range from $4-$8 plus postage.
In the meantime, lets use this thread to discuss some pro-active actions we can take at our state levels to begin to start nullifying unlawful federal actions. Georgia’s ‘lack of courage is not enough to stop any of us in our tracks. We true Patriots love America too much to let her fall by the hands of tyrants. Think strategy!
Be strong and of good courage; be not frightened, neither be dismayed: for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go. ~Joshua 1:9
Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to cheat his way back into the pResidency.
The stunning victory of the Constitutionalists over Barack Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah in Georgia on January 26 was also a victory for the judicial system and the rule of law. No doubt the pressure on Georgia officials is significant so it is important to remind them of the support that exists for their courage.
Defiant Obama–nothing new, of course–blows it by not showing up, but when has he ever showed up even through his lawyers? He has dismissed all of us as just so much toilet paper, and his attack on the judiciary, the people, and the states will not stop with this positive ruling.
The Obama ballot challenge and the Article II SuperPac have had a considerable impact in beginning the process of outright removal of his name from the ballot and has the additional very important impact of raising awareness and doubt about Obama in the electorate. Rather demoralizing for the Obots, Congress, and the media to have spent their wad, ‘credibility‘, and resources defending a fake, fraud, liar, and criminal, don’t you agree? They will stay home, not vote, and ‘blame it on Bush’.
Its time now to go on the offense and cripple Obama in the states he needs to “win” the election. Some 130 electoral college votes are needed in the states of Pennsylvania, Florida, Texas, Ohio, and New York in order for Obama to
give the appearance of have(ing) a chance of winning the 2012 election. Given the Georgia ruling, our next step is…get prepared…use the Constitution: (h/t slcraignbc)
Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.
JUDGMENTS: EFFECT TO BE GIVEN IN FORUM STATE
Article IV, Sec. 1, has had its principal operation in relation to judgments. Embraced within the relevant discussions are two principal classes of judgments. First, those in which the judgment involved was offered as a basis of proceedings for its own enforcement outside the State where rendered, as for example, when an action for debt is brought in the courts of State B on a judgment for money damages rendered in State A; second, those in which the judgment involved was offered, in conformance with the principle of res judicata, in defense in a new or collateral proceeding growing out of the same facts as the original suit, as for example, when a decree of divorce granted in State A is offered as barring a suit for divorce by the other party to the marriage in the courts of State B.
The English courts and the different state courts in the United States, while recognizing “foreign judgments in personam” which were reducible to money terms as affording a basis for actions in debt, originally accorded them generally only the status of prima facie evidence in support thereof, so that the merits of the original controversy could always be opened. When offered in defense, on the other hand, “foreign judgments in personam” were regarded as conclusive upon everybody on the theory that, as stated by Chief Justice Marshall, “it is a proceeding in rem, to which all the world are parties.”
The Obama ballot challenge must move now to these states as a new State Challenge Campaign, and those readers here in those states I would hope would immediately contact the Obama Ballot Challenge and the Article II SuperPac to initiate proceedings:
A State District Court filing of a Show Cause Order asking why the State of (x) should not honor the State of Georgia’s determination under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, addressed to the State Gov., Atty Gen., SoS , and State Election Commission/Board/Agency as Respondents is a logical next step. (h/t slcraignbc).
Already ballot challenges in Illinois and Alabama are underway, for 30 more electoral votes. If we raise enough awareness and enough challenges to make our state officials pay attention, Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to win the election.
And don’t forget Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and the report due out in February. The justice department and individuals have threatened the Sheriff with removal and death, and are finally being held accountable. I doubt that Arizona will have an easy time of putting him back on the ballot, notwithstanding Governor Brewer’s lack of courage and membership in the usurper’s’ ‘council of governors‘.
We will not forget that everything Obama has signed as an illegal occupant of the White House has no effect in law. Think of the tens of thousands of people, including our soldiers, that have died under this illegality.
Section 2 of Article 4 states, in part:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
How correct it would be to have the charges against Obama in any state lead to the arrest and detainment of Obama? Would it stop his endless campaigning?
No Enthusiasm for the Usurper
Obama has already lost the youth vote to Ron Paul. There is no enthusiasm for the Obutt or Moose-hell anymore. Oh, and they’ll have to arrest the OWS people first before they declare martial law, as the Patriots will be at home keeping our power dry. And there is nothing more ugly than the left scorned. We told you Obots, you’re the first ones to be detained under martial law.
…Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.~ Brian Kemp, GA Secretary of State, to Obama’s “attorney” Jablonski
Employing the arrogance and stupidity that is the hallmark of the Obama regime, Jablonski the attorney submitted a last minute libelous letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp which completely misrepresents the entire case history of the challenges to Obama’s constitutional eligibility to hold the office he now occupies. Contrary to this so-called lawyer’s assertions, no court has even considered the facts of the case, preferring to arbitrarily rule that plaintiffs have ‘no standing’.
This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia – that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process. (emphasis added)
The ‘theory’ of Obama’s ineligibility has never been discredited. In fact, by rule, because Obama’s attorneys responded to each case by never submitting anything contrary to what all plaintiffs have presented, Obama has admitted he is ineligible to hold the office of the president. By never challenging the facts, the facts must be accepted as true.
Here are Jablonski’s ‘
legal‘ political desperate illegitimate ‘concerns':
Jablonski should be sanctioned. An Order to Show Cause Why Jablonski should not be held in contempt of Court and charged with undue influence on a public official would be appropriate. In addition, a complaint should be filed with the Bar Association for blatant misrepresentation of facts and libel. (h/t Tenacity).
Remember that Occupy Wall Street began with Obama’s OCCUPY THE WHITE HOUSE.
Letter to the Editor reprinted with permission
January 23, 2012
The nation appears to be catching on to the fact that they were duped by the Democrat National Convention (DNC), through dissembling and deceit, nominating a candidate that was not eligible to be on the 2008 presidential ballot. The forces that worked to keep the fraud concealed are now using the entire power of all branches of the federal government to keep a never-vetted and unqualified putative president in office by whatever means necessary.
There are 9 types of citizen in the United States. “U.S. Citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” do not equate yet liberal propagandists “dumb-downed” Americans through the decades to believe both types of citizenships are the same. It has been a deliberate plan to marginalize and/or silence the Article II, Section 2.5 Constitutionalists by calling them “birthers” and “racists.” The majority of Americans believe one only needs to be born in the United States to run for president. This misconception is the handiwork of anti-American entities who have worked diligently to shred the Constitution and usher in a different form of government.
All eyes and ears will be focused on an Atlanta courtroom on January 26, 2012 to see if Barack Hussein Obama will appear as a private citizen and prove his eligibility to be on the state ballot as compelled by subpoenas issued by Administrative Judge Michael Malihi. Obama’s counsel in Atlanta, Michael Jablonski, filed a Motion to Dismiss attorney Orly Taitz’s challenge to Obama’s eligibility to be on the GA ballot and for the first time in three years a judge denied an Obama request/motion in a court of law and the case moved forward. Then Obama’s counsel filed a request to quash the subpoena compelling Obama to attend the hearing complaining that [His] duties as president of the United States would be interrupted and that the subpoena was, “on its face, unreasonable.” Ironically, the motion was filed the day after Obama sang a solo at a fundraiser at the Apollo Theatre in Harlem. Again, request DENIED.
Contrary to popular opinion Obama’s eligibility to be president has never been heard on merit in a court of law. Until now all lawsuits filed against Obama had been dismissed for “no standing” or “wrong jurisdiction.” The decisions came from federal judges under the auspices of Eric Holder’s Justice department and Elena Kagan, Obama’s pre-election counsel and now, of course, sitting Supreme Court Justice.
There are many of us ‘birthers’ living in fear because we never fell for what we knew was brainwashing and propaganda being fed to the American people for generations. But we ‘birthers’ never forgot the words of a letter dated 25 July 1787 from John Jay to General George Washington as the Constitution was being drafted: “Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolved on, any but a natural born Citizen.”
On January 26th, 2012, will Obama again defy the will of the American people and maintain his status quo of living above the law or will we, the Article II Constitutionalists, have our day in court? Judge Malihi will consider the Supreme Court ruling in Minor vs. Happersett establishing the definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ as born in the United States of parents who are themselves United States citizens. The ruling is binding precedent as to the Constitutional definition of a natural born Citizen. Constitutional attorney, Mario Apuzzo at puzo1.blogspot.com in my opinion has the most consistent and well-documented papers on the eligibility issue where I suggest is the place to go to for back up.
Obama is also compelled to produce his historic documents including but not limited to his birth certificate, adoption papers and Indonesian school records. Should he not comply with the subpoena to appear or present his papers he will lose anyway because his name will not be put on the GA State ballot and the plaintiffs in the three cases to be heard will submit evidence of Obama’s deception and fraud not the least of which is lying on his application to the Illinois Bar. In the space asking for other names used by the applicant Obama entered “none.” Add to this his use of a CT social security number that was never issued to him and fails the E-Verify check. Intriguingly, the social security number is shared by a Harrison J. Bounell from CT, long since deceased but at one time a roomer/tenant in a home owned by the Robinson family. Now that’s just too speculative, too coincidental to be Michelle Robinson Obama’s CT relatives.
But then there’s the selective service record that ties to the social security number but is so fraught with anomalies that taken with the recent problems of a suspicious “Frankenstein” document posted on the WhiteHouse.gov website on April 27, 2011, the whole business reeks of ineptitude or is it deliberate subversive activity.
I for one will be all eyes and ears on Jan. 26. A decision one way or another will help me in my plan to form a coalition of Oklahoma Ballot Challengers to take our case to the Oklahoma House of Representatives. We have been rebuffed by gatekeeper, “Fran” on the election board [who says we have to be a presidential candidate from Oklahoma to file a complaint] and by the Attorney General’s office who will only take cases from the FBI and the FBI that says, “Its beensettled” and by our own Sen. Tom Coburn who says “Its a non-issue” to Sen. James Inhofe who says “Its a non issue” but co-sponsored a bill to change the definition of natural born Citizen to mean born anywhere as long as one parent is a citizen. Thank God and the wisdom of our founding fathers the bill failed as did the other eight or so attempts in congress between 2004-2008 during Obama’s rise to political power.
Former Congressional Candidate D2-OK
(Author’s Note. Update from reader Troy, h/t Katie: Katie says:
January 18, 2012 at 11:28 am (Edit)
That video about Romney was put out by a Newt SuperPAC, and it’s name is based on the book Gingrich published “Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America” in May of 2006. I just verified it at Amazon, and remember when the WH came out with their WtF slogan, Hot Air was all over the stupidity of it, not least of which it plagiarized the Gingrich title.
Thanks to reader Troy, we have to consider that the whole republican field is another set-up and illusion of an election, where Romney will be the nominee and he will lose to Obama. Please study the comments and this video, and think long-term. The ‘surge’ of this republican or that one is just what it is: a mirage to make us think we have a choice. While you may not like Ron Paul, I do not believe he is a part of this as are Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, and Huntsman. Cain presented the illusion of a threat and had to be eliminated by innuendo. Huntsman dropped out and endorsed Romney. Will Bachman be the next traitor to show her part of this charade? :mad: )
The notion that Mitt Romney routinely makes statements lacking a factual basis should not come as a surprise to anyone who has followed the campaign. On the left, Paul Krugman has marveled that no other candidate has ever “lied so freely, with so little compunction.” On the right, The American Conservative‘s Daniel Larison wondered about why he lies, concluding that the former Massachusetts governor is “so contemptuous of the people he tells lies to that he never thinks he will be found out.”
Alarm bells should be ringing in everyone’s ears when Karl Rove, the establishment RINOs, GHW Bush, and democrats ‘praise’ Mitt Romney, or in the case of Nancy Piglosi, jeer at the republicans for their infighting over him.
Mitt Romney can’t climb above 25% in public opinion polls (to the extent that those are believable, it’s actually probably less than 25%), is endorsed by losers and NDAA sponsors like John McCain, and has been running for president for five years. He’s playing it safe, trying to ‘look presidential’ and ‘grown-up’ and demonstrates his deception with every word he speaks. His campaign slogan is deception pure and simple: ‘let’s fight for the America we love” (?)
While trying to run as a “CEO”, and ‘someone who has been in business’, and ‘knows how to create jobs’, let’s hear about Mitt Romney’s “creative destruction” of American business and jobs (h/t Bill):
Can you hear the guffaws as Romney lied in last night’s debate saying “get rid of Obamacare”? Like the guffaws in the film above when he said that the money in corporations goes to the people? Can you hear the democrats focusing on Romney’s corporate savagery as a convenient distraction from Obama’s savaging of America?
There are no degrees of separation between Obama and Romney. They both think they are entitled to the presidency, and they both have the media doing everything in their power to enable the continued destruction of the Constitution. The rinos, dinos, Rovians all want Romney to be the nominee because he will lose to Obama….and if by some miracle he wins, so that the continued theft of America and destruction of the Constitution will escalate.
By the way, did you notice that a questioner in the South Carolina debate asked Romney about his father being born outside the United States, and segued that into a discussion of immigration? Do you notice they will never ask what a ‘natural born citizen’ is? How many of us tweeted that question to be totally ignored? The media and republicans are scared to death of that subject.
C H I C K E N S.
The Defendant states that the issue raised by the Plaintiff was “soundly rejected by 69,456,897 Americans in the 2008 elections.” See Def.’s Mtn. at 5. This statement reflects a complete lack of understanding regarding Constitutional protections.
How could the issue of Obama’s lack of Constitutional eligibility for the office he usurped have been ‘rejected’ when the media, congress, the secretaries of the states, and the judiciary conspired to never let the public know and to block every single effort to uncover the truth? This sounds a lot like the strategy of blaming the victim—says Obama, “its not my fault, the voters elected me”.
Just as the challenge to the placement of Obama’s name on the Georgia ballot began, Obama’s attorney responded against it with this ludicrous argument. Hoping to keep his unconstitutionality out of the news, at the same time his justice department accused Sheriff Joe of racism…effectively creating another diversion in his scam against the people of the United States of America.
This is how this man-child has operated in complete defiance of the Constitution, and his remark cited above shows exactly what the game plan was, and is. Reduce a Constitutional Republic down to mob rule, aka ‘democracy’, create massive diversions, create chaos, and create war to hide his foreign agenda and intent to bankrupt, divide, and destroy America.
Out of this wrecking-ball rubble the Constitutionalists have prevailed, and now challenge him at every step. Whether Obama succeeds in fraudulently placing his name on the ballot in each state, tens of millions of people know that there are serious questions of his origin, citizenship, and legality that remain. And the people have three years of experience with him spending America into oblivion, terrorizing Americans, sicking his justice department and the thugs at Homeland Security, and giving everyone but America consideration. The result is that Obama will have to flip more than 30 million votes to steal this election.
The republicans (aka democrats), desperate to save their power and continue the charade now want to force their candidates down America’s throat, aka Romney, Gingrich, Cain (before the fall)…and are willing to commit voter fraud to do so. In this context, and with the real prospect of losing all our liberties, the following initiatives are worth our time, attention and support. With many of us unable to financially contribute to these efforts, support can take many forms…
In the event that Obama steals the election again, the time is NOW to start working on your senators and representatives to ensure that Obama is challenged in the joint session of Congress held in early January 2013 to ‘confirm’ the results. All we need is one Senator, and one Congressman to issue the challenge, in writing in that forum. There is plenty of material to submit with the challenge.
Obama and his banksters will threaten Americans throughout 2012–they have already attacked us but watch for the warnings of attacks within the U.S. if we dare to step out of line and vote for the Constitution, not the NWO as brought to you by Romney, Gingrich, or Obama.
Oh, and please don’t forget all the people who have stood up against this regime, those who have died, lost their homes and savings, and soldiers sent into harms way without tools or support. Let not their sacrifices be in vain.
Patriots everywhere have gathered to form an Article II Super Political Action Committee whose main goal is to ensure:
“…that citizens and elected officials clearly understand Article II and the definitive meaning intended by the United States of America’s Founding Fathers of “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN,” thereby working to create a legally-binding vetting apparatus which will ensure all presidential and vice-presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible in 2012 and future elections….”
As Mario Apuzzo has written:
Our Constitution requires unity of U.S. citizenship and allegiance from birth only for the Office of President and Commander in Chief of the Military, given the unique nature of the position, a position that empowers one person to decide whether our national survival requires the destruction of or a nuclear attack on or some less military measure against another nation or group. It is required of the President because such a status gives the American people the best Constitutional chance that a would-be President will not have any foreign influences which because of conflict of conscience can most certainly taint his/her critical decisions made when leading the nation. Hence, the special status is a Constitutional eligibility requirement to be President and thereby to be vested with the sole power to decide the fate and survival of the American people. Of course, the status, being a minimum Constitutional requirement, does not guarantee that a would-be President will have love and fealty only for the United States. Therefore, the final informed and intelligent decision on who the President will be is left to the voters, the Electors, and Congress at the Joint Session, to whom hopefully responsible media and political institutions will have provided all the necessary vetting information concerning the candidate’s character and qualifications to be President.
Head on over to the new site and find out what you can do to help! In the meantime, learn more about the fraudulent Congressional Research Service’s obfuscation of the constitutional eligibility requirement:
The Tea Party is all for limited spending, small government, and supposedly states rights, and only mentions the Constitution in the context of a ‘balanced budget amendment’, which ignores the true danger of calling a Constitutional Convention, and ignores the fact that if Congress was acting according to its limited enumerated powers, we would not need to alter the Constitution to control members of Congress. And the Tea Party endorses everyone but the one who makes the Constitution a center-piece of his campaign, and refuses to address the usurpation of the Presidency by Obama and the democrats.
And we continue to allow Congress to determine what the Constitution means, and their unelected and irresponsible staffers, always
protecting covering their collective asses on allowing the criminal usurpation of our government. Commander Kerchner writes:
To attorney Jack Maskell, of the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the master of the false premise in his efforts to protect Obama in his writings for Congress:
Adjectives mean something. A “Citizen at Birth” is not logically identically equal to a “natural born Citizen at Birth”. Barack Obama may be a ‘Citizen of the United States’ but he is not a ‘natural born Citizen of the United States’ and does not meet the constitutional standards as to who can be the President and Commander in Chief of our military: The natural born Citizen clause in our Constitution is a national security clause inserted into our Constitution by John Jay and George Washington. The natural born Citizen clause is still important and worth protecting.
How is it possible to claim yourself to be a “Patriot”, and not be demanding a return to constitutional governance? Yes, of course we know there has been a concerted effort to destroy American principles and mis-educate, but even those of us who are awake seem paralyzed…between time, if you will, between the past and the future. Our present circumstances demand we take action at all levels, we look for leaders and it always ends up with the person you see in the mirror.
We need a plan and must be willing to take that long march back to the Constitution…as much as the progressives have shown their willingness to be patient in their quest to destroy America, we must show equal tenacity in our return to sanity and the sanctity of the Constitution. We all must lead.
TRUE PATRIOTS vs. FALSE PATRIOTS
(From Red Beckman, “Walls in our Mind”, Segment 5)
If you are an adult American; If you have been educated in a government school; If you are a member of an organized, IRS approved, corporate church; If you watch CBS, NBC, ABC television news and read a daily paper, you probably didn’t know there are two kinds of patriotism. The two distinct forms of patriotism are totally opposed to each other and can never peacefully coexist.
True patriotism is people giving their allegiance to their country. False patriotism is people giving their allegiance to a government. In the last segment, we addressed the fact that the junk heaps of history are the final resting place of many governments. Nations continue to exist even after many changes of government. The Romanian dictator, who was executed on Christmas Day 1989, was a very powerful man until the army switched allegiance. Politicians cannot control a government unless they have the allegiance of a nation’s people. This is why politicians try to convince people that nation and government are one and the same.
In an earlier segment you read that our present government is not our lawful government. Registered voters sitting on Grand Juries and Trial (Petit) Juries have given their allegiance to politician controlled government. Politician created laws, statutes, codes, regulations, opinions, acts and decisions not in the best interest of our country, are being enforced by voters on juries. Our lawful government was subverted and changed because jurors gave their allegiance to government, rather than their country.
A true patriot is one who is guided by truth and facts (knowledge). A false patriot is controlled by the lies which he has believed. In segment one, we defined the difference between believing and knowing. We have been taught, all our lives, that our government was to be controlled by majority vote. The true patriot knows that politicians can control majorities with false information. Politicians tell lies the majority want to believe. This is what party politics is all about. The party that promises the most goodies, from the public treasury, will usually find the most believers (voters). Remember, it was a majority vote that put Adolph Hitler into office as chancellor of Germany. Hitler was a powerful politician because there were far more false patriots than true patriots.
False patriotism is a source of power, for politicians, in the United States of America. Deficit spending, confiscatory taxation, inflation, deflation and no-win wars, is the price we pay for misdirected patriotism. Viet Nam and Korea were politicians’ wars, which would not have happened if our lawful government had been functioning. Over one hundred thousand of our best young men were denied their freedom to live, love, propagate, work, retire and die a natural death. Both Korea and Viet Nam wars were the result of false patriotism. Those two wars made false patriots rich but our country was damaged severely. Those politician caused wars were not in the best interests of the United States of America. We have Americans who believe they are free because politicians told them they are free. The dead and maimed, from Viet Nam and Korea, are the evidence that proves we are not free.
True patriots know the federal individual income tax is an unconstitutional tax which was created to control people. Fear is the weapon used by tax collectors, when you have a politician controlled government. Thousands of Americans have committed suicide because of IRS-psycho-terrorism. The KGB were famous for their activities and they murdered great numbers. The IRS is more scientific and subtle. If they can mentally damage an individual and cause an individual to take their own life, it becomes the perfect crime. It is for sure there will be no prosecution of the responsible IRS agents. A government judge, government prosecutor and twelve false patriots on a jury are not going to find an IRS agent guilty of anything. The psychological damage caused by fear can be more deadly than a bullet between the eyes. Fear on the backs of a nation’s creative and productive people is not in the best interests of the people and nation.
A true patriot will not be terrorized by the IRS. Many true patriots have been sent to prison by false patriots, sitting on juries in tax prosecutions. Most victims of such prosecutions, use jail time to become better educated and better Americans. It was false patriots in Nazi Germany and Communist Russia who arrested, and many times, executed true patriots. The Gestapo, KGB and the IRS were created, by politicians, to control people’s minds. People, who give their allegiance to government, will not protect themselves or their neighbor from the IRS because they believe the IRS is a necessary evil.
In a later segment, there will be more said about the unconstitutional income tax. Hopefully you have noticed how everything you have read to this point is focused on what we have stored in our minds. Minds that have become disabled by belief, of false information, may need shock treatments. Stay tuned, there is more to come.
For many, the journey to awareness began will Russo’s film, “From Freedom to Fascism”, also captured on this site’s video links.
One of the most obvious reasons the Supreme Court has refused to take any eligibility case is that it -the Supreme Court- has already decided the matter of Obama’s eligibility for office–in 1875. Reaffirmed several times since then and even by Congress in 2008, there is no need for a ‘clarified’ definition of ‘natural born citizen’, and Obama can be removed right now…not by impeachment, not by a
Congressional wimps ‘r us hearings, not by the 25th Amendment–but by his immediate arrest.
“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
“At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v Happersett 1875
“Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to the Presidency.” Luria v. U.S., 1913
The Fourteenth Amendment was definitively a statement about slaves becoming citizens of the United States; and the arguments from the flat-earth eligibility deniers have been thoroughly discredited. They have managed to distract the general public away from this dangerous threat to our national security…and those that continue to cover for him will one day have to tell their children–from their own jail cell– how they allowed this mess to go on.
Until Minor v. Happersett is overturned, the SCOTUS holding stands: Obama is not eligible to be president of the United States. He is only a usurper.
The Provost Marshal is nominated by the President and Defense Secretary…and the Defense Secretary would have to give the order to arrest…what to do when the usurper has control ?
Put on your big boy pants and arrest him or resign.
…and if it is, who was responsible for the usurpation of the Office of the President of the United States in 2008? And what is/are the framework or frameworks that enable immediate remedy?
In the post Acts of War a brief review of the many “acts of war” against the U.S. from within was presented, such as the 1913 federal reserve act and fraudulent ‘ratification’ of the Sixteenth Amendment by SOS Philander Knox, Woodrow Wilson and the rise of the ‘progressives’-turned-socialists-turned democrats, and the FDR, Truman & Eisenhower rise of the military-industrial complex with the CIA. All of these over the last 100 years contributed to the placement of Barack Obama, a constitutionally ineligible phony, into the highest office in the land.
Enabled Covered by the blind and uninformed support of millions–itself enabled by controlled media–an ‘advancement in race relations’–was cheapened by Obama and used instead to destroy them.
The placement of a usurper into the office of the Presidency of the United States is the most blatant act of war against America since the Federal Reserve Act and Sixteenth Amendments of 1913 and the establishment of the military-industrial-government (i.e. CIA) complex in the 1950’s.
Our framework for analysis and action on the breach of Article II has taken many forms, including executing all legal actions possible–focusing on forgery, definition of natural born citizen, violation of liberty interests, fraudulent social security and selective service, and election fraud. In addition we continue to exercise our unalienable rights to life and liberty and our First, Seventh, and Tenth Amendment rights, we have petitioned, held grand juries and submitted charges of treason, and proposed and passed legislation. There have been successes and drawbacks in each forum but we are quick on our feet. The greatest advantage is that we have exposed the workings, form, history, components, and agents of this network and how Obama was placed into the White House. We know how this regime is aided by cooperation of the judiciary and members of congress which turns a blind eye to the truth.
- Recognition that being born in America of parents who were citizens of and who had allegiance to another country would not be sufficient to ensure complete fidelity to the United States.
- Since no one in the U.S.A. was a natural born citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution–they were born British subjects and gained U.S. citizenship in April 1782 at the end of the Revolution– and since there would be no ‘natural born citizen’ that had obtained the age of 35, a provision was made to grandfather in those initial American citizens to be eligible citizens for President. Martin Van Buren was the first natural born citizen President of the United States as he was born Dec 1782 to two U.S. Citizens, who acquired their U.S. Citizenship at the end of the Revolution.
Just how are they going to get Obama on the ballot?
This essay is written to clarify the questions regarding Senator Marco Rubio’s constitutional eligibility for the office of Vice President or President. During this study, it has become apparent how important the citizenship of the parents is to determining whether the child is a natural born citizen and why this remains a national security issue at its core.
We understand that in the 235 years of our Nation’s history, the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ as used in our Constitution has not changed. From this it is paramount that both parents must be citizens and have no foreign allegiance when the child is born in order for that child to be the Constitutional Article II natural born citizen. On the surface then, Marco Rubio is not a natural born citizen because his parents were not American citizens at the time of his birth but naturalized four years later.
One would think this is the end of the story. Not.
Rubio’s supporters, including republicans who don’t think about Article II, obots still trying to justify Obama’s existence, and the Tea Party, will want to bury Rubio’s natural born citizen issue first and foremost, perpetuating or covering up the constitutional crisis we are in with the usurper Obama. This will be done either for expediency to defeat Obama or continuing to cover for Obama, but it perpetuates a disservice to our Constitution.
For those who would like to take an analytical approach, examining the real questions of citizenship instead of glossing over them, this article is for you. The analysis reveals that in order for Marco Rubio to stand for either President or Vice President, he would need a SCOTUS ruling to determine if his citizenship at birth was undivided and unalienable. Without this ruling, he would be another constitutionally ineligible candidate, no matter how much you like him.