Archive for the 'Politicians' Category

Liars

©2013 drkate

Satan is the father of lies. John 8:44

Check out this Oregon billboard…looks like every democrat in the country could have one of these put up in their neighborhood, on the major freeways… (h/t Socialism is not the Answer)

obamabillboard

And when you start smelling your own sh**, and get caught, this is how you look:

o smelling shit

Some relevant reading:

Obama care does not apply to 95% of Americans–read the Robert’s Decision.  So why is Congress continuing to play games?

Obamacare, ruled a ‘tax’ by the SCOTUS, originated in the Senate, not the House, where all tax bills have to originate.  Again, why is Congress continuing to play this charade?

Medicaid expansion is unconstitutional as it threatens states with the loss of existing funding if they don’t agree to expand medicaid.  See link pp 45-58 (h/t QL)

Speaking of lies told by this administration, Benghazi was an inside job..and US quietly offers as $10 million dollar bounty for the Benghazi attackers who murdered Ambassador Stevens.  So which member of Congress will claim the reward?

Open thread and caption contest for the Obama photo.

Questions for a Constitutional Convention

©2013 drkate

Of all the so called ‘Patriot Actions’ the one that is most disturbing to me is the call for a Constitutional Convention.  Over the last several years many have proposed new amendments to the Constitution, including some of the major provisions such as the qualifications for the office of the president, and other amendments that require Congress to follow the same rules as citizens of the United States and a balanced budget amendment.

What we don’t hear, even from the patriots, is the need to eliminate illegal amendments–those not ratified properly by the states– such as the 14th, 16th, and 17th amendments.  Nor do we hear calls for the restoration of the original 13th Amendment, which would have prevented lawyers (titles of nobility such as ‘esquire) to serve in government.  And of course, nobody talks about enforcing the existing constitution, which for example would eliminate the need for a ‘balanced budget amendment’ because Congress would have to stay within its enumerated powers.

So the lawyers and lobbyists across the country are pushing for a Constitutional Convention, glaringly a ‘con’ as in ‘con con’.  Remember this is the same group of people who were barred from serving in government by the original 13th amendment, which ‘disappeared’ from the Constitution  after the war of 1812.  The British burned the White House and the effort was to eliminate the records, research, and proceedings that produced the Declaration of Independence and the first Constitutional Convention which produced the Constitution for the United States.

The lawyers and legal profession, and its gaggle of judges, would go on to essentially ‘gut’ the Constitution’s provisions by developing the Administrative Procedures Act  (APA) and other “legal tools” to prevent we the people from even knowing the strength of the Constitution’s provisions and the protection of our  God-given rights enshrined therein.   The APA essentially makes it impossible to gut excessive agency development, for example, the EPA, and allows a suit only on the grounds that it violates the APA, not the Constitution’s limits on executive power. If the lawyers were barred initially from serving in the government, what are they doing now rewriting the constitution?

What will Disappear in the New Constitution? 

Photo of Ayers taken on September 11, 2001

Photo of Ayers taken on September 11, 2001

You can believe that our founding on God’s law–common law–will be eliminated.  This is the dream of all the marxist dems and all the republicans, now clearly just one part of the cabal that dislikes the American people and disrespects our founding documents, calls our founding fathers ‘terrorists’, and claims that our constitution is fatally flawed.  This propaganda has been spread to the general population through government schools (Common Core, anyone?), and now through our churches which have completed the ‘falling away’ as  2 Thessalonians 2:3 predicted.  And here we have Pastors saying that the American people do not deserve liberty anymore.  We can point fingers at everyone else as to who is responsible for this debacle, but when you point one finger at anyone three point back at you.

If our founding principles disappear, then all we have is a counterfeit.  That suits satan’s purposes just fine.  As long as we don’t remember God, or Jesus the Christ, our the founding principles of common law within the ten commandments, then confusion and lies will reign.  That’s the plan.

Questions for a Constitutional Convention

Is a Constitutional Convention an appropriate tool to renew the foundations of liberty in America?  Here are some questions for consideration that will help you decide!

  1. What will a Constitutional Convention cover?  What rules will limit the scope and coverage of a Constitutional Convention?
  2. How are the delegates to the Constitutional Convention selected?  Who selects them?
  3. What choice do ‘we the people’ have in selecting Convention Delegates and what assurance do the people have that these delegates will be truly representative of the people?
  4. Why are Constitutional Convention proponents mostly lawyers?
  5. Do people know that a Constitutional Convention has as much power as a joint session of Congress?
  6. Will the Constitutional Convention rewrite the constitution?
  7. How can we prevent the Constitutional Convention from rewriting the Constitution?
  8. It is known that the Obama regime has already drafted a new Constitution, its ready to go.  What will prevent Obama’s constitution from replacing our constitution?
  9. The original 13th Amendment prohibited lawyers (anyone who took a title such as “Esquire”) from serving in government.  Why is it that mostly lawyers are promoting a Constitutional Convention, and shouldn’t they be barred from participating?
  10. What provisions, or where is the law, that provides for a state to rescind its call for a Constitutional Convention?
  11. Will a Constitutional Convention be able to rescind or remove the 14th, 16th, and 17th Amendments, which were not properly ratified by the States?
  12. The Constitution is based on Common Law.  The lawyers have corrupted this and believe the Constitution is ‘case law’.  Will the Constitutional Convention return us to Common Law?
  13. Most attorneys ignored Article II of the constitution  which confirms that Obama is not constitutionally eligible to serve as president, saying it was  ‘a matter of interpretation’.  Who are they to now rewrite the Constitution?
  14. How can a constitutional convention defeat the liberal agenda when the call to revise the constitution is a call from the left, liberal, lawyers???

What is going on in your part of the country on a Constitutional Convention?  Where do citizens, legislators, Pastors, and attorneys stand on this issue in your state?

April Fools

©2013 drkate

Faker in Chief

Faker in Chief

Obama is so desperate to hang onto power that his false flags are openly broadcast and evident to all but the most obtuse.  A cold-blooded killer, he has no worries about setting them up to murder Americans.  You can bet when he’s involved, he will go to a ‘memorial service’ at the site.  Think Gabby Giffords (Judge John Roll’s murder), Sandy Hook, Aurora, Boston. Think Andrew Breitbart, too, although Obama’s memorial would have been too obvious, and the dozens of people murdered during this regime’s reign.

The falseness of these events where Americans are murdered is shown by all the actors that show up to pretend they were gravely wounded–like the guy who faked losing his legs at the Boston Marathon, identified as a faker through videos of his actual loss of limbs in Afghanistan and his putting on a prosthetic at the site of the bombing in Boston.  Do you actually think that a man with both his legs blown off would be conscious and holding a tourniquet on his own leg?

And like magic, the media go on a feeding frenzy pointing out the suspect who was never involved in the plot in the first place, pointing away from the obvious involvement of  Obama’s hit squad–Eric Holder, Valerie Jarrett, Naps Napolitano, Blackwater security, and dozens of other ‘lessor players’.  Of course, Obama is just using CIA assets who have been brainwashed in the MKUltra program, or hit with a drug like scopolomine.

An article posted here over a year ago identified the hallmarks of a false flag:

  • Staging events, or having staged against him—blamed on fake Tea Party, muslims, other candidate’s supporters, or others– that directly threaten or injure him or his family, solely to win a sympathy vote or ‘guilt’ vote.  Remember his trip to see his ‘dying grandmother’ in the fall of 2008.  Obama is willing to kill those around him or even injure himself in order to gain an edge on abject rejection in 2012.
  • Staging the “OWS” movement
  • Allowing/inviting/staging/provoking an attack against the American homeland
  • Creating new tensions in the middle east or other parts of the world
  • Causing agencies of the US (TSA, BATF, FBI, military, CIA) to become aggressive in limiting Americans’ movement, possessions, access to power, water or food
  • Price manipulation
  • Communications disruption
  • Creating a fake third party of democrats

And we add to the list

  • Broadcasting false flag events in advance, like Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombing
  • Lying about false flags that went awry, i.e. Benghazi

Here is something possibly scheduled for April 28–a facebook posting on a nuclear event in Lost Angeles.  Now that this is out the city will be changed or the event scheduled for another time:

Do some digging on this please!  :shock:

What should our focus be on now?

  • Benghazi cover up
  • 2012 Election theft
  • Obamacare failure–and the republicans’ continued funding of Obamacare despite their feigned outrage for it
  • Obama’s continued lack of eligibility
  • Treason
  • (what ever happened to) Gunrunner
  • new aid to the Syrian rebels as Assad accuses the US of backing Al Queda in Syria
  • Continued bankruptcy of America by the federal reserve

…and the list goes on…

The mockingbird media–even the ones who are supposedly ‘exposing’ all of this, have their own agenda too.  Is it to stifle revolt, or to incite premature revolt of the American people?  Think carefully about who you trust right now.

The false flaggers will answer to God, and it won’t be pretty.  Got your place in the lake of fire yet?

Spiritual wickedness in high places, indeed.

Open Thread.

American Affirmative Duty

©2013 drkate

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.

A prescient article in Canada Free Press by E.K. Robinson asks the fundamental question of our day as we look to what is next:

Why are we pretending? Pretending that elections in 2014 might change things, that elections in 2016 could too?

Indeed,why are we pretending that we need more research to ‘really’ know what is going on? Or who Obama ‘really is’? Or that the so-called republicans and so-called democrats are really the same party?  Or that the theft of our nation has been going on since at least 1871?

david-and-goliath-2With lightening speed those of us ‘behind’ in our learning caught up pretty quickly in the last five years, often learning about the ‘old timers’ who have been awake for many years longer than we have.  This is a good thing, and, there comes a time when all this learning must be put into action.  As I review my own learning it seems I have crossed new thresholds as an ‘innocent’ study of the Constitution in 2009 produced over 700 articles where the initial topic of Obama’s usurpation turned into a full-fledged ‘seeing the forest from the trees’.  In 2013 I am in a profoundly different place on many levels.

What now is my affirmative duty as an American? I think you would agree that it is almost impossible to ‘sit still’ with the information you now have…it is true that we must keep educating but have we run out of time for the willingly blind or fence sitters to ‘wake up’?  throwing pearls after swine..those who are not listening cannot or will not…they have been deceived sometimes willingly.

As we complete the second month of the new year,  I am inspired, as are perhaps you, to reflect, learn, and make a plan for my own work in doing my job as an American, exercising the revolutionary right we have as in our Declaration of Independence:

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

Why-The-MilitiaThe States right now might just as well be are colonies of the federal government, which has abandoned the restraints that We the People set out in our revolutionary founding. The Second Amendment was designed for this moment, when the government became tyrannical, stationed troops in the homeland, and taxed the without representation.  Is it any wonder that it is under attack, as the last bastion of our defense, and that they will kill to ensure it happens?

Americans who are alert have exercised restraint; it is those who are unaware that squander the moment.  While governments should not overturn for any light reason, the Declaration reminds us of our weaknesses:

… all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

As we deeply reflect on the status of our Nation and the government that has come to control it, its deep roots and multiple tools, does anyone have any question in their mind about what is our duty from hereon out?  Do we need any more debates, analyses, evidence about Obama and the entire government’s complicity in the takeover by a foreign ‘agent’? How about on the role of the banksters and international financiers, debt, government growth, taxes, or slavery of citizens?  How about the growth of the police state surrounding us?

We face a Constitutional Crisis unknown except at our founding. What is our Affirmative Duty as Americans  knowing what we do about our government?

Unfortunately we cannot count on the police or local law enforcement to help, they only have to enforce the law and don’t have an affirmative duty to protect an individual.

Time and history would assert that it is our Constitutional duty now to act in the affirmative defense of our Constitutional Republic through the dismantling the illegal government that exists right now and establishing new Guards for our future security.

Uncharted Territory

We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.~Albert Einstein

The_Thinker-webAs far as the problems confronting us as Americans, our advantage is we now know the ‘thinking that was used to create the kind of problems we face’. We have their names, organizations, connections, and what they control. We know what their tools are, including these horrific false flags involving the murder of Americans here and abroad. It is a sobering understanding in the context of what our duty is as Americans today.  Our enemies are ruthless and will stop at nothing to achieve their goals.

And we outnumber them. We are ‘armed’ with a lot more than a weapon in our own defense, and now suddenly, our offense. Think about and gather from that.  Each one of us that are awake has a gift to give to this struggle, and our affirmative duty individually is to find it and use it.  In our lifetimes this is uncharted territory that involves a combination of pushing back, nullifying on a personal, community and state-wide level, and creating new Guards for our future security.

But as we do step up, I believe we have a duty as Americans to do so with certain guidelines:

  • Check your ego at the door.  If you can’t lead without being acknowledged as ‘the leader’, then step down.  Your personal ego has nothing to do with rescuing our Nation.  This is not about you, it is about God, and Country, and Family…in that order.
  • Stop the scare-mongering.  Does fear mongering with all the ‘insiders’ get you new ratings?  Lots of visitors to your radio, TV show or blog?  Then stop it.  Think about how fear mongering stifles action, thought, reasoned dialogue, developing of plans, and creates confusion.  Satan is the father of lies, confusion, and fear.  Fear is what satan wants, because it paralyzes.  The opposite of fear is FAITH.
  • Stop the game-playing.  So you’re a politician and think you’ve got the upper hand because you are one?  So you think you’re smarter than the average bear?  Prove it.  Dare to show your humanity, be creative in solving problems, not creating new ones or new classes of victims.  Be creative, not destructive.  If you are creating destruction, you’ve only proven how stupid, obtuse, and uninformed you are.  Get over yourself.

All the laws, executive orders, bad legislation, ignorance, threats, and drones have no intrinsic value or worth except by those who want to control what they cannot.  The authors of these actions have no idea that they are cutting their own throats.  We have no obligation to follow them whatsoever: they have lost the consent of the people.  And they have no idea what judgment they will bring upon themselves.  All they know, like Satan, is that their time is short.

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.- King James Bible “Authorized Version”, Pure Cambridge Edition

Think small cells, neighborhoods, preparation; read, learn, understand; local action; be the Watchmen.  When we’ve had visible leaders, they* have killed them…

Ezekiel 33:6 – But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take [any] person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand.
Jeremiah 51:12 – Set up the standard upon the walls of Babylon, make the watch strong, set up the watchmen, prepare the ambushes: for the LORD hath both devised and done that which he spake against the inhabitants of Babylon.

Open Thread.

Talk to the Tail

©2012 drkate

Just a note to tell you what I think of the fraudulent election and the continued marxist administration…I offer you an earlier caption contest at drkatesview.  The winning slogan was “talk to the butt”  h/t Logistics Monster…

Talk to the Butt.

Never too late for more captions, however, so consider this a continued open thread in the spirit of the Gadsen Flag!

You Didn’t Win That Election, Obama

©2012 drkate

The ‘gift that keeps on giving‘…

Photo h/t Reality Zone Unfiltered News

Open Thread!

Run for the Roses

©2012 drkate

We’re in a race for our Country, for victory over the dark forces of Satan, of the dementia of our captured politicians.  Soon millions will descend on our nation’s capital, and simply escort the scoundrels to jail.  It will be like the Gideon moment.

Run for the Roses…in the winner’s circle…

What’s on your mind today?

Witness to the Protocols

©2012 drkate

…a lesson shared…

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.  Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. ” Ephesians 6: 12-13

I am sure that many of you that read these pages, having done your own research  from many other sources, agree that the true enemy is this spiritual wickedness.  We also know from our studies that deception is a major tool employed by spiritual wickedness…and lies, deception, and chaos are in the spiritual realm of Satan.

We should fully understand that its not that cute little devil  sitting on your shoulder as in ‘the devil made me do it’ that is the enemy, it is the real Satan standing right in front of you manifested  by many things, one of which is Agenda 21.  The Agenda 21 program is the mechanism that the NWO uses to spiritually, physically and institutionally implants itself on the land and in the people.

Remember Satan’s temptation of Jesus the Christ in the wilderness:

5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.
6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for what is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.
7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.

By exercising spiritual discernment Jesus was able to answer:

8 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. Luke 4:5-8 KJV

What we are witnessing today on the spiritual and in the physical realm is that many have taken Satan up on his offer and seek the control over and wealth of all the kingdoms, the power, and the glory. By mocking God’s kingdom, power, and glory,  Satan is counterfeiting God;  he is the father of lies.

When we don the ‘full armour of God’ to stand against this,  it includes opening  our eyes and ears, and discernment from our knowledge and spiritual senses to identify the truth of what is in fact going on right now in our country and on this earth.  It sometimes requires the direct confrontation of people with the truth by spoken or written word, so that as many may see as possible, and so that the sorting and screening is active every day as armour against the lies.

In this spirit of inquiry for truth, this blog begins to detail what we have witnessed together here on earth, where Satan has captured  this set of his chosen people and is using them to enslave, impoverish, and murder humankind.  If this sounds harsh, think of all you know: the large scale assault of chemtrails, pharmaceuticals, wars, false flag events, water treatment, flouride, agricultural chemicals, radiation poisoning, and genetically modified seeds as examples of the assault. Think of the current Agenda 21 as what this physical, food and environmental assault is intended to both mask and enable.

Its not going to surprise you that the capture of specific groups of people by Satan has been endemic from the beginning.  What will surprise you in this inquiry is the extent to which we are currently witnessing the manifestation of the ‘final plans’ for humanity crafted and implemented by that dark, spiritual wickedness long ago.  These are the things that bring His return.

And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.Matthew 24:22 KJV

The Khazars

If Jesus were alive today”, said a friend of mine, “he would be considered anti-semitic” for discerning Jews from Israelites:

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.  Revelation 2:9

In other words, those say they are ‘Jews” but are not Israelites,  who are God’s chosen people.  This means that not all ‘Jews’ are God’s chosen people.  I know you have been taught differently, and “God’s chosen” gets mixed up with the state of ‘Israel’, so even educating on the issue brings calls of ‘antisemitism’.  But I am obligated to share what I know in warning, as this is a rarefied spiritual battle, what we are here to witness.

Khazaria 800 AD

The Jews of the synagogue of Satan are descendents from the Khazars. Today’s descendants of the Khazars are the Ashkenaz Jews, although there is much debate underway.  In fact though, the Askenazim include the Rothschilds (translated ‘Red Shield), Rockefellers, and many other monied JKhazar Jews, who together form a cabal acting like a synagogue of Satan that is in full gear enforcing its agenda on America, including Agenda 21.  They are the Zionists.

The cabalist group I refer to is the Synagogue of Satan, an ancient, yet modern, elite so politically powerful and so fabulously wealthy that even past history has been twisted, reshaped, and revised to meet its preferred version of humanity’s gloomy, totalitarian future….Religious in nature, the Synagogue of Satan is, at its essence, a grotesque, satanic cult. It’s high council is composed of High Priests of Lucifer; these are men who literally worship death while practicing sexual magick and occult rituals of the blackest nature.

~snip~

The initiates of every secret society and internationalist organization, from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Jesuits to the Bilderbergers and the Order of Skull & Bones, obey the dictates of this sinister group and tremble when standing before its leaders.

These Jews are not the Israelites, God’s chosen people:

…the bulk of modern Jewry is not of Palestinian, but of Caucasian origin. The mainstream of Jewish migrations did not flow from the Mediterranean across France and Germany to the east and then back again. The stream moved in a consistently westerly direction, from the Caucasus through the Ukraine into Poland and thence into Central Europe. When that unprecedented mass settlement in Poland came into being, there were simply not enough Jews around in the west to account for it, while in the east a whole nation was on the move to new frontiers”`Arthur Koestler, “The Thirteenth Tribe”

Some additional history which shows why this information is important today:

The Protocols of  the Learned Elders of Zion

Searching for the truth of what is underlying the situation we find ourselves in now, and wanting to expose it, I believe that Satan is handily at work trying to destroy the world through his chosen: the Synagogue of Satan,  “those who say they are Jews but are not”.

What we find is that there are actually descriptions of protocols that show exactly how the Khazerian Jews–the Zionists– would take control over the world over the non-Jews.  Among those considered ‘non-Jews’ are the 12 Tribes of Israel.  The Protocols were written down in the 1920′s but created in the 1800′s, supposedly crafted as meeting notes from a gathering of the ‘learned Elders of Zion’, the elders of the Khazaerian-Ashkanazi Jews…the synagogue of satan.

Wikipedia describes the Protocols as an ‘anti-semitic hoax’ designed to disparage Jews and roundly dismisses any discussion of them.  However, when I look at the Protocols, I see the 20th Century completely described in terms of the squandered wealth, war, depressions, terrorism, the state of American culture, interracial strife, immigration…The names of the people involved go right back to Rothschild, Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie, Morgan, Warburg…that we have been studying here almost separately.  I submit these people are Satan’s chosen, and what they are backing we must resist at every level. They are the synagogue of Satan.

So I have read  the book ‘Synagogue of Satan‘, and will transmit here and in future posts excerpts as we trace the history and transformation of the Khazarian Jews.  Whatever your view of the Protocols, they describe the tactics that have been used by this cabal against the rest of humanity endlessly and pretty well describe the state of America and the world right now. The Synagogue will just give you confirmation in the form of names, dates, and events.

From the Protocols:

Protocol 1.3

It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorisation, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare.

The basic doctrine begins with a belief in man’s lowest instinct–the temptation in the wilderness–and makes the satanic lie that every man aims at power. Well, they only do if they worship Satan, ‘take him up on his offer’ of all the kingdoms.  Every measure uses violence and terror appealing to Darwin-sanctioned ‘survival of preferred races the fittest’.

Would you agree that the major tactics of the New World Order and their governments, and the spiritual energy behind our suffering is  almost total violence and terror? Combined with deception?  Then we have our enemy, and it is of Satan.

From the Synagogue of Satan…

The cabal’s basic tenet is  ‘by way of deception we shall do war’.

History shows that  war is accomplished by deception by a cabal of people who always fund both sides of the supposed conflict. The conflict itself is the deception.

…end of lesson shared…

Your thoughts?  And an open thread.

On the 11th Anniversary of Osama Bin Ladin’s Death, Obama vows to end the war in Afghanistan, again.

©2012 drkate

Since most of the world knows that Osama Bin Ladin was already dead before Obama killed him again, and his death kept a secret for some ‘future use’  when needed by a politician, it behooves us to discuss the significance of his death and its use by the politicos who love sending other people’s children off to war to get their legs blown off. (h/t SLA)

Let’s revisit why we know Bin Ladin was already dead by the time Obama claimed to kill his corpse again.  First, George W Bush gave it away in 2004 when he suddenly switched from “Wanted, Dead or Alive” to “I’m really not that concerned about Osama anymore”.

Zbig creating Osama Bin Ladin

Notice his body language, the blinking eyes, the failure to make eye contact, and the twisted mouth…all indicators that he is lying.  And, if Bush wasn’t that concerned about him anymore, why did he keep our soldiers in Afghanistan fighting and dying for nothing?  Bin Ladin was used as a pretext for passing the Patriot Act, the war in Iraq, and the development of the Department of Homeland Security and expansion of the government’s spying powers.  These wars were an excuse the drain the U.S. treasury of taxpayer dollars, too,necessitating more government borrowing and spending.    All this time, Bush and Congress kept up the foreign aid to those who supported our enemies.

Since Al Queda was created by the CIA and was still useful as a bogeyman,  remember in 2004 Bush had to release another fake tape of Bin Ladin threating America in order to ‘win’ the election against John Kerry–himself cheating against Bush while being outed as a totally false Vietnam medal-winner.  I remember many suggesting the ‘American Al Queda’ actually looked like Karl Rove…certainly it was a Karl Rove scheme aided and abetted by Osama’s creators, the CIA.  The new bogeyman was Saddam Hussein…as America moved money and soldiers to Iraq and forgot about Afghanistan.

Here are the coalition deaths by year in Afghanistan.  Notice the number of deaths have increased dramatically since Bush said ‘he didn’t care about Osama’, and even more dramatically since Obama took office.

Year US UK Other Total
2001 12 0 0 12
2002 49 3 18 70
2003 48 0 10 58
2004 52 1 7 60
2005 99 1 31 131
2006 98 39 54 191
2007 117 42 73 232
2008 155 51 89 295
2009 317 108 96 521
2010 499 103 109 711
2011 418 46 102 566
2012 93 16 31 140
Total 1957 410 620 2987

The number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq since 2003 is 4,480…in 2003 486 soldiers lost their lives and in 2007, 904 lost their lives. Bush and Cheney lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the United States spent billions and lost hundreds of millions of dollars there.

So much for the anti-war left.

2007 Bhutto Video

Before she was murdered, Benazir Bhutto also asserted that Bin Ladin was  killed in 2003 and buried in an unmarked grave:

Is this one of the reasons she was murdered?

The Hoax, Again.

Flagging in the polls and forced to release a hastily forged birth certificate, Obama had no choice to play the Osama card.  He probably needed permission from daddy Bush to do so, who was hoping to save it for use by Jebbie Bush as a ploy to steal the 2012 election.  But the story, matched by an already-in-waiting ‘public demonstration’ of gleeful murder in front of the White House that evening, was another hoax.  To wit:

Merely a week after President Obama announced the death of Osama Bin Laden, there is literally a deluge of evidence that clearly indicates the whole episode has been manufactured for political gain and to return Americans to a state of post-9/11 intellectual castration so that they can be easily manipulated in the run up to the 2012 election. Here are ten facts that prove the Bin Laden fable is a contrived hoax….

1) Before last Sunday’s raid, every intelligence analyst, geopolitical commentator or head of state worth their salt was on record as stating that Osama Bin Laden was already dead, and that he probably died many years ago, from veteran CIA officer Robert Baer, to former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, to former FBI head of counterterrorism Dale Watson. In addition, back in 2002 Alex Jones was told directly by two separate high level sources that Bin Laden was already dead and that his death would be announced at the most politically opportune moment. Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under five different Presidents, serving as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under the Nixon, Ford and Carter, told the Alex Jones Show last week that Bin Laden died of marfan syndrome shortly after he was visited by CIA physicians at the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001.

2) The official narrative of how the raid unfolded completely collapsed within days of its announcement. First there had been a 40 minute shootout, then there was no shootout and just one man was armed, first Bin Laden was armed then he was not, first Bin Laden used his wife as a human shield and then he did not. First the compound was described as a “$1 million dollar mansion” then it turned out to be a rubbish-strewn dilapidated compound that was worth less than a quarter of that. Almost every single aspect of the official narrative has changed since Obama first described the raid last Sunday as the White House struggles to keep its story straight.

3) The alleged body of Bin Laden was hastily dumped in the sea to prevent any proper procedure of identification. The White House claimed this was in accordance with normal Islamic burial rituals, however numerous Muslim scholars all over the globe disputed this claim, pointing out that Muslims can only be buried at sea if they die at sea. While the White House claimed that Bin Laden’s death on May 1st was proven by DNA and facial recognition evidence, such proof was never released for public scrutiny and the Obama administration refused to release photos of Bin Laden’s dead body, suggesting a cover-up.

4) Despite the fact that the White House released “situation room” photos which purported to show Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and the rest of Obama’s security staff watching the raid which killed Bin Laden live, it was later admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that Obama could not have seen the raid because the live feed was cut off before the Navy SEALS entered the compound. The photos were described by many as having “historical significance,” forming a “captivating” record of Obama’s greatest success and being the “defining moment” of his Presidency. One image showed Hillary Clinton with her hand over her mouth as if witnessing an anxious or crucial moment in the raid. Media reports at the time claimed that the photos represented the moment when “The leader of the free world saw the terror chief shot in the left eye.” However, the photos were staged as a PR stunt for public consumption, nobody in the photos ever saw Bin Laden killed live, nor did they see the Navy SEALS even enter the compound.

5) As even mainstream journalists began to cast suspicion on the official narrative behind the raid, the media reported that Al-Qaeda itself had confirmed every detail of Obama’s address the the nation. However, the conduit for such a claim was in fact an organization called SITE, which is a notorious Pentagon propaganda front run by the daughter of an Israeli spy that has been caught on numerous occasions releasing fake cartoonish “Al-Qaeda” videos at the most politically expedient times for both the Bush and Obama administrations. The SITE organization is nothing more than a contractor for the U.S. government, receiving some $500,000 a year annually from Uncle Sam, and yet the corporate media instantly swallowed and regurgitated the claim that “Al-Qaeda” had confirmed the official story after SITE directed them to an anonymous posting on an Islamic website.

6) Almost every single neighbor that lived near the alleged Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad that was interviewed by news reporters said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there. Since the town is a staging ground for the Pakistani military, which has a training facility situated virtually a stone’s throw away from the alleged Bin Laden compound, residents were required to show ID when they moved into the area. Pakistani troops and anti-terror police in the town refused to confirm that Bin Laden had lived in the house. Barack Obama himself admitted to 60 Minutes that the White House was only 55/45 sure that Osama lived there before the raid and this uncertainty prompted concerns that the US Navy SEALS sent in could have targeted a “prince from Dubai” or some other individual that was not Bin Laden.

7) The videos released by the White House this past weekend which purport to show Osama Bin Laden making Al-Qaeda tapes in October-November 2010 are almost identical to footage first released by Pentagon front group SITE nearly four years ago. Remember, a May 2010 Washington Post story reported how the CIA had admitted to making fake Bin Laden videos. Despite the White House’s insistence that the footage of Bin Laden is recent, he looks younger and healthier than tapes released almost a decade ago, having apparently dyed his beard black. A separate video that purports to show Bin Laden in his compound flicking through satellite TV channels depicts a much older looking man with a gray beard. Analysts have pointed out that the man has different shaped ears to real Osama pictures from back in 2001. A doctor has also pointed out the fact that the man in the tapes released Saturday has no problem moving his left arm, whereas video from 2001 clearly illustrates how Bin Laden was unable to move his left upper extremity because of a permanent injury probably related to damage to the peripheral nerves. Why the cameraman would film the back of Bin Laden’s head as he watches television is also dubious. Residents in the town of Abbottabad claim the man in the “television” video is not Osama, with one individual claiming that the man labeled by the White House as being Bin Laden is actually his neighbor, a man named Akhbar Han.

The Navy Seals who accomplished the raid on someone in Pakistan were murdered to hide the evidence, just as the body was dropped into the ocean.

The Usurper’s Re-Election Strategy

After safely instigating black on white murderous rampages across the country, and his OWS spring assault, Obama sneaks into Afghanistan to both brag about Bin Ladin’s death and to announce an ‘end to the Afghanistan war’.  Obama releases a commercial trying to reap the credit for whatever operation was used to kill Bin Ladin’s corpse..Romney crys ‘foul’–when they all know Osama was already dead.  (note: Betcha Mitt wanted to use Osama for himself, or save it when he was in political trouble.  Sorry mittens, that card has been played.)  This after months of Obama trashing our soldiers, tying their hands behind their backs so they can’t win the war, and despising America in the usual fashion.  Obama tries to claim credit as ‘the most important moment in my lifetime’ for killing Bin Ladin’s corpse.

Now Obama “pledges‘ (wink wink oink oink) to end the war in Afghanistan, already having promised that in 2008…he was against the war before he was for it.

Political Advantages of Keeping Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

There are many reasons Obama, Bush and Congress have betrayed and killed Americans in these so called ‘wars’, which were never legal wars.  In fact, too many reasons to list here…but I can think of a few:

  • Oil, oil, and oil, including pipelines
  • Drugs, guns, and smuggling of both
  • Killing American soldiers, wounding thousands, and killing the morale of the troops (remember the conviction of Lakin at Christmas-time 2010?)
  • Impoverishing America and wearing America’s spirit down
  • Distraction from the assault on the home front by Obama’s brownshirts (OWS, IRS, BATF, TSA, CIA, FBI)
  • The permanent ruination of the American economy and socialist take-over of industries
  • The geo-engineering attack on America, including floods, earthquakes, HAARP, chemtrails, and tornados
  • The development of the police state.
  • The NDAA–keep the wars going so all the provisions of NDAA, including the detention of Americans, are ‘in effect in time of war’
  • Military false-flag exercises with Chinese and Russian troops
  • Theft of the 2012 election and republican collaboration to that effect

Well Mr. Usurper, we are not fooled and see right through your transparent effort to boost your flagging, failing self and your utter stupidity in blowing wide open the NWO plans for our demise.  And Dick Morris, by the way, is trying to convince republicans to stay home and not vote because ‘obama will lose in a landslide’.  Yeah right… we know you are covering because Obama has to flip 30-40 million votes to win, which when he does, you republicans can blame it on the people staying home and not voting.  Yawn.  :roll:

Obama’s hit list is a mile long and growing every day.  He just wants to chalk up all of America in his column, and plans on a second term to do us in.  We wait your next move, but you won’t know ours.

A Warning to Republicans

©2012 drkate

There are more than enough factors to suggest that Republicans will lose handily to Obama in the upcoming presidential election.  Here are just a few:

  • Your choice of VP nominee.  You’ve got problems.  They are named Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, and Bobby Jindal.
  1. All signs point to the unconstitutional choice of Marco Rubio–once the darling of the tea party, now a traitor to the constitution for not immediately bowing out of the running due to his non-NBC status.  Marco’s parents were not US citizens when he was born.  If you nominate the ineligible Rubio, how different are you than the usurper Obama?  Rubio supports the NDAA, supports internet crackdowns aka privacy invasion and has been singularly unspectacular in his first two years as a senator. He needs experience and you republicans should stop trying to play the race card by putting in a cuban to get the hispanic vote or to take Florida.  We the people aren’t as stupid as you think.
  2. Jeb Bush.  You really want to ‘bush-whack’ the American people again? “W” lied about the war in Iraq, gave us TARP (the grand cover up of theft), and gave us torture, the Department of Homeland Security, and any number of nefarious and dubious Executive Orders expanding the powers of the president.  Daddy bush, the grand master behind it all, ushered in the NWO, the CIA (formerly the SS), was present at all the political assassinations in the last 30 years, and still controls the game.  Bush Sr and Romney are best buddies.  Who do you think chose Romney for 2012?
  3. Jindal.  His parents were not U.S. citizens when he was born, and he is not a natural born citizen.  What deal did he make with Obama on the Gulf BP oil spill?  How has he compromised his state to ‘get along’?
  • Sweeping Obama’s ineligibility and crimes under the rug.  Your spectacular, intentional failure to address Obama’s ineligibility makes you complicit in the crime.  I suppose you think that just by winning the office you can ‘make this go away’.  On the contrary, we the people will have every right to ignore and arrest you for violating your oath of office.  Any of you republican candidates who fail to address this issue are sealing your fate with millions of us…far better to continue our efforts against the usurper (and the rest of you) because he is fully and completely exposed.  With you chicken republicans, it will be swept under the rug and never be addressed.  Heck you will probably reach into the private sector and pardon Obama of his treason.  Which makes you treasonous.
  • Your position on the NDAA and Homeland Security.  How are we to believe anything you say about the constitution, small government, the rights of the people when you support draconian actions to gleefully kill Americans or detain them indefinately—are you listening John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Michelle Bachman, Mitt Romney?
  • Your failure to tell the truth about income taxes, the FED, and fiat currency. As we face the collapse of the dollar, you discuss play games with the democrats about who gets taxed and how much, swear the FED stabilizes the economy, and continue to deceive Americans who are now waking up, in large part due to Ron Paul’s truth telling.  Never will Gingrich, Santorum, Romney ever talk the truth.  They are willfully ignorant, in fact, taking great advantage of the system.
  • Your position on unconstitutional wars.  Yes, lets keep sending other people’s children to get their legs blown off, while you rape in the profits from the military-industrial complex, give America to the UN, and pound your fist in false righteousness.

How many actually believe Romney will win?  Clearly these guys don’t:

Better watch out. A Gideon strategy may come around and bite you in the butt.

John McCain’s Collusion with Barack Obama

©drkate 2012

The problem with John McCain’s campaign ‘against’ Obama in 2008–and all the republicans–was that he intended to lose all along.  When he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate, he almost won the election because of her popularity.  So he had to undermine her and his republican, luciferian, and banking cabal had to manufacture an economic crisis quickly, and engineer his poor response, to make sure Obama ‘won’ the election.  Not to mention that McCain lost more than 10 million republican votes because they simply stayed home and wouldn’t vote for him.  It will be just the same with Mitt Romney–we don’t want him as our candidate but the republicans have once again engineered their own defeat just to play games with the demon-crats.

Its time that John McCain was confronted and recalled. There are many of us in Arizona that will be initiating a recall campaign of John McCain very soon, and soon enough you will see our fundraising efforts posted everywhere.  We will need about a quarter of a million signatures–Maricopa County alone could provide most of them…considering McCain’s obvious treason involved in purposely losing to, failing to expose, and current collaboration with Obama.

Here is an open letter to McCain from Dr. David Earl-Graef LtCol USAFR, (h/t Jeff Lichter)

Open letter to: Sen. John Sydney McCain III:

Not so long ago in the military there were certain acts looked upon with such disdain that we seldom even spoke of them. In fact, we seldom actually encountered them, so there was no need. One is cowardice and another is worse, much worse –treason.

For the sake of others reading this letter, I point out that all service members enlisted and officer alike takes an Oath. While the Oaths are slightly different we are individually bound to them. What follows is the Oath taken by the Officers:

“I, (state your name), having been appointed a (rank) in the United States (branch of service), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the office upon which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

It is important for those seeing this for the first time to note, the Oath for officers specifically states that the Constitution will be supported and defended against all enemies and it acknowledges that the enemy may be found on foreign soil or in one’s own backyard. I would even say an enemy can arise in oneself if the desires of personal gain or power or sense of self importance are allowed to become greater than the desire to honor ones Oath. Perhaps indeed, this is the greatest enemy for none are immune to it and it is insidious in is appearance.

Would you not agree, Senator McCain, it is implicit that a United States Military Officer or Public servant who takes this oath and then conspires or is a party to an act or actions that seeks to undermine by purpose of evasion, the spirit and intent of the Constitution of the United States would fit the definition a traitor? Would you not also agree that those who take the Oath are not at liberty to pick and choose which parts of the Constitution they will defend while choosing to ignore others? One part is not separable from the others just as we, as a Nation, are not separable from the sovereignty of our creator from which our rights come.

Some time ago, I wrote you a personal letter pleading with you to honor your oath you took as a Military officer and then again as a United States Senator. The letter cover was clearly marked that the contents were personal and for you only. While it was initially returned unopened- the second mailing was not, so I must assume you received it.

In my letter I pleaded with you to once again display the courage you did as young Naval Aviator and then as a POW in Vietnam. I asked you to stop and consider if you had put your own ambitions and sense of self importance in front of your duty. I asked you to step forward and apologize to the Nation for not being honest with us. I assured you and I had full confidence that such an act of humility would be accepted and the American People would forgive you of your trespass, for your action would spare us from an ongoing injustice of such proportion our Nation has never seen before. I pleaded with you for the good of our Nation and even for your own redemption to come forward and expose the greatest fraud that has been and is being perpetrated on the American people; a fraud in which you yourself played a part. I acknowledged how difficult it would be and I also acknowledged the necessity of it just the same. I NEVER received an answer-nothing from you, not so much as single word. Not an explanation-nothing. The same silence you exhibited during the 2008 campaign.

So now I am given no choice but to write this for all to see. I cannot find the words to describe the extent of my disappointment but only state that it grieves me immensely as I trusted you and respected you as a fellow military officer. Before I discovered what I am about to tell the Citizens, I even gave you something that was precious to me, my vote for you to become the President of the United States. In this moment, I would rather have suffered total disenfranchisement from my right to vote, than to bear the shame and embarrassment that I gave my vote to you.

As a US Military officer, in keeping with my oath of office I demand that you, Sen. John Sydney McCain III, answer not to me but to the to the Citizens of the United States why you are not guilty of treason. Please show them that I am in error and that you did not betray your Oath as an Officer and as a Representative of the People. Explain to them why your name and that of Barrack Hussein Obama BOTH appear on Senate resolution 511 declaring you John Sydney McCain III a “Natural Born Citizen” by virtue that BOTH of your parents were US Citizens regardless you were not born on sovereign US soil.

I am not going to belabor myself explaining to you the basis for my assertion that neither you or Barack Hussein Obama meet the Constitutional requirements to hold the office of POTUS. I am certain you know what defines a “Natural Born Citizen “and America is leaning quickly. What I am clearly stating is that both you and Barak Obama had SERIOUS questions regarding your qualifications under Art. II section 1 of the United States Constitution. I am clearly stating that BOTH your names are in the Congressional record of SR 511. Tell me how this does not show that there was collusion between you and Barack Hussein Obama to undermine the Constitution of The United States. Why is Barack Hussein Obamas name on that document with yours? Is this what bought your silence during the campaign?

Many people believe that if Barack Obama was not qualified to hold the office YOU would have brought this up during the campaign. Those that are less informed and support Barack Obama use this claim as “proof” that Barack Obama is himself qualified. They use this to ridicule and demean the very citizens you represent and you do absolutely nothing except remain silent on the issue and let them bear the brunt of the insults. You stood by while Lt Col Terry Lakin was stripped of his honor, everything taken from him to include his freedom just as you were in Vietnam and you did NOTHING. Do you not think the People have a right to an explanation? Tell them plainly why YOU would not be BEHOLDING to Barack Obama on the very issue of eligibility?

It is not now nor ever was my intent to publically humiliate you, or in any way bring disrespect upon the office of the Senate that you occupy. I hope you see that you have given me no choice but to move this to the public arena. I will not remain silent while I see our Constitution shredded before my eyes by what appears to be an act of treason. You were elected to serve the people not yourself and you are not above them. I am certain that this letter will make you angry but I am not the one who betrayed my Oath, you are. Please, I am asking you again to step forward and do what is right for yourself and the country. We all have made mistakes and we all are entitled to forgiveness but only when we confess those mistakes and ask for it.

If I am wrong I will withdraw my demand and offer you a public apology and I will ask for forgiveness from you. If I am right however I remind you that Judas Iscariot had his price, the promise of 30 pieces of Silver. For him, in the end, he lost everything to include his soul. No price is worth that. Certainly not the Presidency, not your Senate seat – not even if one were to gain the entire world. Was a Quid pro Quo in the form of a promise of silence regarding the illegal candidacy of Barack Hussein Obama your price? Did you commit treason or were you duped? I still believe you have an opportunity to reconcile yourself to your Oath of office and to the American people and to God; but the open door to this opportunity will at some point close FOREVER and no amount of pleading to the people will redeem you. The cloak of darkness that has kept this from the American people is rapidly coming unraveled. This fraud WILL BE EXPOSED and your part in it will not be forgotten. You will be held accountable to the American people in a court of law or before the Congress. Do not miss the opportunity to step forward -the time is now not later.

Sincerely,

Dr. David Earl-Graef LtCol USAFR

For more information:

  • Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, skewered by his own attorney.  The attorney was provided to him by the so-called “Patriots Union”, JB Williams‘ outfit…who bragged about it but never showed up for the trial.
  • Those who escaped jail for asking the same question Lakin did.
  • Terrorists have more rights than our own soldiers.
  • Misprision of Treason for senators and congressmen for failing the American people and violating their oath of office

The Sixteenth Amendment and the Federal Reserve

©2012 drkate

It is no coincidence that the two major actions which have undermined the Constitution and taken control away from the people occurred during the same year, and that they are intricately related.  The Federal Reserve Act established a central banking system in the United States–not controlled by the federal government–but designed to control the federal government. The Act was passed by Congress on December 23, 1913 and  illegally granted authority to a banking cartel to issue Federal Reserve notes as legal tender.

This allowed the U.S. government to borrow these notes–money–to grow beyond the boundaries of the Constitution, and pay them back to the central banking cartel with interest.  Where would the money come from to pay back the banking cartel?

“Income taxes”, aka, the non-ratified Sixteenth Amendment.

Notice the burst of ‘federal spending’ outside the Constitutional limits–for example, creating agencies, expanding the military operations overseas, creating laws outside of the eighteen enumerated powers that expanded the government after 1913.  The government borrowed money from the FED, and earmarked Americans’ personal income to pay it back. Declaring bankruptcy in 1932, the ‘social security scheme tax’ was implemented–and promised to Americans as a safety net in their retired years. We’ve all paid into it but the politicians stole it…my mother until her last day paid taxes on that social security ‘income’ that was in fact derived from taxes on her income all the years she worked.

The book, “The Law that Never Was”, researched and written by Red Beckman and Bill Benson, provides the historic documentation that the Sixteenth Amendment was not legally ratified. This book is being offered free to the 50,000 commenter on drkatesview.

In a series of “letters to the IRS” taken from the book “Do Unto the IRS As They Would Do Unto You!”, the author advises a misdirected IRS agent attempting to collect illegal income taxes to do the research himself to verify the non-existence of the Sixteenth Amendment:

  • Read the Congressional Record to check the intent of Congress in 1909.  Who was to be taxed–the rich, the middle class, or th epoor?
  • Find the resolution passed by the Congress.  Try to find a bill passed by the Congress.
  • Get Senate Document 240 (Library of Congress 1931–Serial set 9346)
  • Look at the legislative journals for the 48 states.  Why did the 48 states suspend their rules in their consideration of the Sixteenth Amendment?
  • Did the state legislatures pass resolutions or did they pass bills?
  • Check to see if these resolutions are binding
  • Find out why the proclamation by the Secretary of State is labeled PRIVATE LAW
  • Where is the President’s signature?
  • Can a law be passed without the President’s signature?

The Freedom Law School is offering a $300,000 reward to anyone who can prove the Sixteenth Amendment was legally ratified.  If you are instead more concerned about how to deal with any current “IRS Problems” this site provides some excellent resources and guidance.

As advised by Joe Bannister on Revolution Radio’s “Walls in our Minds” recent broadcast, it is important to understand the realities of challenging this illegality thrust upon America in the last 99 years.  The awakening of the people to this fraud is why the ‘NWO’ and alien financiers are so hell-bent on controlling the world through destabilization and defeating America as we speak, as these words are written.  Notice the only candidate to mention the Sixteenth Amendment and the income tax is Dr. Ron Paul–who understands the sound money system which our country was built on, and to which our Republic must return.

When the word of the income tax fraud began to be spread via public meetings in the early 1980′s, IRS agents would show up at these public meeting places and record the license plates of attendees…with the inevitable IRS notice of audit sent along shortly thereafter.  How astounding to find in the ‘confidential’ IRS Tax Audit Guide for Special Agents the following notes:

“An individual taxpayer may refuse to exhibit his books and records for examination on the grounds that compelling him to do so might violate his right against self incrimination under the Fifth Amendment and constitute an illegal search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment”.

Looking for Balls

©2012 drkate

Well, the republicans don’t have any, and the democrats never had them. But these two can’t seem to stop looking for them…

did they really roll down the hill?

(h/t Jan)

If you’d like to add a caption, by all means be my guest! :lol:

In the meantime, here are some excellent interviews and events that took place this week:

  • Joe Bannister, retired IRS agent, along with Terry Dodd and Red Beckmann, discuss “The Law that Never Was”–the Sixteenth Amendment–on drkates Revolution Radio February 16, 2012. Pay attention to the questions that are asked, and answered, such as ‘what is income’? Check out these two websites for more information on one of the greatest hoaxes played on Americans since the founding of our country.  DON’T FORGET…that a free hard copy of Red Beckman’s “The Law that Never Was” will be given to the person with the 50,000th comment on DrKatesview! 
  • Obama ballot access challenges were filed in Arizona and Pennsylvania this week by two well-known patriots.  Please be sure to support these efforts at the legal fund established to defray costs of these suits as the Article II SuperPac, and check in on the efforts at the Obama Ballot Access Challenge site.
  • Georgia Superior Court asked to overrule the GA SOS and the judge-less Maliki’s erroneous decision

You see boys above, real Patriots do have balls, we don’t need to go looking for them.  The establishment will not have an easy time of it, as the Revolution will not be televised.

Have fun!

Romney, Rubio, and Rove Busted!

©2012 drkate

First, let us remind ourselves why Romney will lose to Obama (h/t Troy):

Romney, through his hairball Karl Rove, has been coughing at threatening everyone that Romney will win and he will choose the constitutionally ineligible Marco Rubio as his Vice President.  This is the same Karl Rove who helped elect the constitutionally ineligible Obama by conspiring with Donna Brat-zille in 2008.  These elitists care nothing about America, the Constitution, or liberty so to hell with running anyone that is constitutionally fit for the job.

But the ‘tea party darling‘ Marco Rubio has stepped in it BIG TIME, for his co-sponsorship along with the demoncrats of the two internet-killing acts, the Protect IP Act (PIPA) and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)…oh, but now backtracks as if he was a champion of the internet:

I have decided to withdraw my support for the Protect IP Act. Furthermore, I encourage Senator Reid to abandon his plan to rush the bill to the floor,” Rubio posted on his Facebook page.

Rubio’s change of heart comes as a bit of surprise as he was co-sponsor of the bill.

:roll: :lol:
To make matters even clearer, Rubio favors the indefinite detention of American Citizens by defending his vote for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).  Rubio, along with Romney, vigorously defend giving the president the authority to both kill and detain American citizens with much fanfare.
But no amount of ‘sweet-talking’ or ‘elite-speak’ can defend either of these two politicians, so eager to betray America they can hardly wait. Salivating, even.  The RNC and GOP have some ‘splaining to do–as they fall into the trash bin of history just like the other liars, clowns, rubes, and wannabe kings.
The GOP wants Obama to win, which means they want America to lose.
Whose side are you on?

False Patriots, Ron Paul, and the Constitution

©2012 drkate

America would be in better shape if we had more statesmen discussing the issues in light of constitutional argument and not through political labels used to dumb-down the thought process of choosing a candidate.~Timothy N. Baldwin, J.D.

The virulence with which the so-called ‘Patriots’, ‘Conservatives’, and ‘Constitutionlists’ dismiss Ron Paul is a fine measure of their utter lack of knowledge  of and respect for the Constitution, liberty, and history; it is also an indicator of their moral collapse and intellectual bankruptcy.  Unable to mount any critique Ron Paul’s positions, his record, or ideas, they search for the false promise of an idea that Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, or Huntsman could ‘beat’ the disaster known as Obama/Soetoro–why vote for any of them when their ideas are just like Obama’s?  Do you think any of these ridiculous RINOs would, if elected, eliminate Obamacare, stop the spending, return power to the states, or make Congress follow their oath of office?  Do you think any of them would not pardon Obama for his crimes against Americans and crimes against humanity for using our weapons to overthrow governments that are of no threat to the United States?

I was stunned when listening to a blog talk radio show which claims to be about the constitution to hear the speakers totally eviscerate the Constitution’s provisions on who is to declare war…“drkate says that the Constitution says only Congress can declare war–that is absolutely wrong!!!”  So I had to ask them if they thought Libya, Egypt, Iraq, Vietnam, and Granada, and El Salvador actions were ‘cool’ with them.

Equally stunning is the absolute silence when mentioning the reality of the Federal Reserve and the related Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments; while agreeing an audit of the federal reserve is necessary, and that both amendments were unconstitutional–there is no application of that constitutional thinking to the selection of candidates for the White House.  Stating that there was no difference between the republicans and democrats brought jeering responses like “that sounds like a Ron Paul line”.  Who are these people who claim to love America?

It is hard work to right the ship of state known as America, and to finally and permanently eliminate the forces that want to destroy us.  It is outside of most people’s comfort zone, and when faced squarely with themselves, people do not want to admit they have been duped or that their own studies tell them that a one Dr. Ron Paul has been right all along.  So they resort to name-calling and outright lies, all the while claiming to be Patriots…even leading so-called Patriot’s organizations.

Here’s an answer:

A RESPONSE TO JB WILLIAMS’ ARTICLE ON RON PAUL

By Timothy N. Baldwin, JD.
January 10, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

(Posted with permission)

J.B. William’s article attacking Ron Paul, released on December 30, 2011 on NewsWithViews.com, perhaps deserves (I use the word loosely) a response. Williams’ assumes a lot and qualifies virtually nothing. He takes for granted the meaning and understanding of words like “conservative” and “liberal” and uses them to pigeon hole politics and pit people against Ron Paul. It is this kind of miniscule attention to detail that spreads misinformation and disinformation masqueraded as “fact.”

Let us consider Williams’ attacks on Ron Paul in order, and I will offer a critique for the sake of integrity in journalism and truth in politics.

1. Williams says, “Ron Paul remains totally MIA (Missing In Action) on Obama’s Article II ineligibility, which disqualifies Obama for office and every member of congress, including Ron Paul!”

This is a useless tool against Ron Paul and benefits no voters. There is not one Republican candidate taking on this issue. One has to ask, what difference does it make that Ron Paul is not leading the charge in this regard? If no one is taking on this issue as a part of their campaign, then everyone’s score is “zero to zero.” Williams’ use of “fact” is a tongue-in-cheek, sarcastic jab at Ron Paul as a “constitutionalist.” But this jab can be made universally to all the candidates; thus, this information is useless and irrelevant to persuade the voters and distinguish the candidates.

2. Williams says, “Mr. Constitution would know the primary function of the Federal Government is to protect and defend the United States against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic. – To do that in a 21st Century world, you better have one hell of a standing Military, which Mr. Constitution also opposes.”

Williams obviously mocks Ron Paul as “Mr. Constitution.” Williams steps outside of the objective and enters into the subjective and emotional. Williams’ credibility as an objective journalist diminishes significantly. We need less emotion in politics and more statesmanship. This mockery fails in that attempt.

As to Paul’s stance on defending the United States (while also supporting and defending the United States Constitution), Williams’ offers no support of his insinuation that Paul will fail at protecting the United States, and he offers no references as to what Paul’s plan is for the military and our entanglement in foreign affairs.

It is difficult to take journalism like this seriously when there is not one reference to a reliable source about Paul’s plan. Nor does Williams generate a comparative analysis of Paul’s plan versus the other candidate’s plan and how those plans conform to the constitution and to good policy as it relates to all of the factors affecting America right now (i.e. depressed economy, over-taxation, federal bureaucracies, unemployment, etc.). It amounts to, “ok, children, the sky is green because I say it’s green,” tautology.

3. Williams says, “Obama likes running unopposed. He has won every political race by eliminating his opponents, leaving him unopposed in the general election.”

What Obama likes has nothing to do with Ron Paul’s positions and his viability as an opponent.

4. William says, “Hillary Clinton was a lock for the DNC nomination in the 2008 primaries. Then the nobody from nowhere with a blank résumé and no birth certificate, stole the show. In the end analysis, the left always marches forward in lockstep, despite their many internal disputes. But the political right is more divided and scattered than ever in U.S. history, and they are no match for the unified international left that has already eliminated any real opposition for Obama in 2012.”

Williams makes an observation (“the political right is more divided and scattered than ever in U.S. history”) that offers a reality check about our political condition. Perhaps the reason for this so-called division is because the Democrat-Republican monopoly is finally starting to crumble and the people are getting sick of the same ol’ politics as usual.

Indeed, competition of ideas and real policy critique are resulting because of people like Ron Paul who are willing to think and act independently of political party. The spirit of independence was seen as a good thing in America, and political parties were seen as a potential hazard to that independence of thought. Attacking Ron Paul on these “divisive” grounds does little to convince the American who sees a problem with Democrat-Republican elitism corrupting what we want in leaders.

To Williams, marching in “lockstep” with the political party of choice is more important than one’s responsibility to the Supreme Law of the Land. Yet, for many people, Ron Paul’s breakup of the party monopoly is a long-awaited answer to prayer.

5. Williams says, “Ron Paul will not rule out a third-party run.”

So what? This has nothing to do with Ron Paul’s positions as a constitution-protector and nothing to do with his current candidacy as a Republican. Williams does not develop this thought at all but just throws it out there and presumably hopes that it will stick on the wall for people to draw their own (sinister) conclusions.

6. Williams says, “The Ron Paul campaign is built on a foundation of social liberals, chronic anti-war misfits, modern day peaceniks seeking legalized drugs, atheists, and Democrats and Independents with libertarian leanings. Nowhere in there is ‘conservatives…’ who oppose Paul as much as they oppose Obama. If Ron Paul were a constitutionalist, he would attract the conservative vote.”

Williams demonstrates the epitome of prejudice and incredibility on a political level. The tone of his statement rings of personal offense. Williams’ mis- and over-characterization of Ron Paul’s “foundation” should warn any person (who cares about logical argument) reading his article to be cautious about his premises and conclusions.

Williams uses only key-word titles as “proof” of his arguments against Ron Paul; terms like, “liberal,” “misfits,” “peaceniks,” “atheists,” “conservatives.” Perhaps Williams should have included a glossary of terms in his article, because these words have very little relationship in understanding and applying the Supreme Law of the Land.

America would be in better shape if we had more statesmen discussing the issues in light of constitutional argument and not through political labels used to dumb-down the thought process of choosing a candidate. Williams’ argument using this description amounts to a fifteen second commercial of a candidate explaining why you should “vote for me: I’m a conservative republican!”

And by induction of Williams’ random comments, the word “conservative” only includes those who would use the federal government to force “morality” on the people even though the U.S. Constitution leaves the matters of morality, health, property, contracts, marriage, etc., to the States. Williams’ attack on Ron Paul in this regard is as much an attack on the United States Constitution.

7. William says, “Ron Paul is at odds with conservatives on numerous key issues.

1. Paul supports same-sex marriage
2. Paul opposes the death penalty for violent criminals
3. Paul opposes mandatory sentencing for three-time losers
4. Paul supports legalizing illicit drugs
5. Paul opposes firm enforcement of immigration laws
6. Paul opposes free trade
7. Paul opposes a strong U.S. Military and National Defense
8. Paul opposes foreign diplomacy and prefers isolationism
9. Paul opposes stricter limits on criminal campaign finance
10. Paul opposes the Patriot Act, but also insists on letting terrorist live amongst us
11. Paul supported the arbitrary withdrawal from Iraq that resulted in deadly terror attacks hours later.”

Williams presupposes an “opposition” between Ron Paul and “conservatives”, even though he does not define the terms he uses repeatedly to try to prove Ron Paul is not “conservative.” And should Williams decide to define the term “conservative,” it would do America well to compare the term “conservative” with the original textualism and intention of the constitution.

When the President swears the oath of office, it is to protect the constitution, not someone’s subjective understanding of “conservative” or “liberal.” Are we not past the years when these terms are used as a basis for any understanding deeper than a Hallmark card?

Williams’ analogy of what Paul “supports” and “opposes” reminds me of the arguments made against the ratification of the United States Constitution. The argument went like this, “since the constitution specifically named items outside the jurisdiction of Congress to regulate (i.e. Bill of Rights), then all items not included in that list are subject to federal control.” That is, since item A through E was specifically excluded from their jurisdiction, the remaining items F through Z are included by implication. The Federalist Paper writers, of course, smashed that argument.

Williams’ illogical argument is similar against Ron Paul: since Paul will not use the federal government to create and enforce laws regarding marriage, drugs, and other domestic issues, he therefore supports gay-marriage, high crimes, stoned druggies, etc. If one is a supporter of the constitution, this should excite us—putting power back where it belongs, allowing the democratic process to reflect the will of the people in a more localized, controlled manner.

In reality, Ron Paul’s position mirrors what the Federalist Paper writers said concerning the powers to regulate the general welfare of the people: the States will retain “a very extensive portion of active sovereignty…[whose powers] are numerous and indefinite”; and the “powers delegated…to the federal government are few and defined” (James Madison, Federalist Paper 45). Apparently, to Williams, this is not acceptable.

Additionally, Williams mischaracterizes Ron Paul’s positions. Williams references no credible sources and gives the reader nothing to hang his hat on. He expects people to rely on his word alone. I would hope that people reading Williams’ article would do their own homework and find that his descriptions are inaccurate and distorting at best.

7. Williams says, “As a result, he cannot muster the conservative vote in November 2012, without which, he cannot defeat Barack Obama.”

This statement is based upon Williams’ own definition of “conservative,” whatever that is supposed to mean. Undoubtedly, these terms “conservative” and “liberal,” which describe people in a one-dimensional image, are not accurate to describe the true multi-dimensional makeup of America. Williams ignores the nationally-known cases where people see Ron Paul as the only true conservative. The pigeon-holing simply will not work in 2012. America needs more substance. Williams’ conclusion lacks any analysis based upon any facts.

8. Williams says, “Most of Paul’s ‘social conservative’ congressional votes are actually Tenth Amendment votes, which sidestep the actual issue at hand and redirect the discussion to states right. While conservatives are strong on Tenth Amendment states right, they are also strong on founding principles and values grounded in the moral laws of nature, at the foundation of our Constitutional Representative Republic. Paul is actually a liberal leaning populist candidate, rather than a Jeffersonian libertarian.”

I seriously question Williams’ understanding of or appreciation for the U.S. Constitution at this point. Williams tries to make Paul appear antithetical to the “founding principles and values grounded in the moral laws of nature…of our Constitutional Representative Republic”; however, it was that very generation that left matters of morality, police power, and domestic regulation to the States—the same matters Ron Paul says are the States to govern.

Williams also attempts to separate Paul’s political ideology from Thomas Jefferson’s. He does so in the attempt to disenfranchise those who would support Paul for his support of States’ rights. Yet, Williams does nothing to support his statement.

To Williams, it is not enough that the President of the United States would leave these matters to the States to regulate, as the constitution requires; he would rather use the President to enforce laws of morality even though that exercise of unconstitutional power goes against the “principles and values [which founded] our Constitutional Representative Republic.” Williams is more concerned about enforcing (federal) laws he likes as a “social conservative” than getting the country on the right track of constitutional governance.

Williams’ logic and conclusions are irreconcilable.

9. Williams says, “He has little in common with American conservatives and that presents a serious problem for him when conservative voters are looking to reverse course in America. Paul has been MIA on far too many constitutional issues to call himself a constitutionalist with a straight face.”

How Williams can make such a broad statement as to claim to know the characteristics of the “common American conservative” demonstrates a less-than-statesman approach. Williams displays the “he is not on our team” fallacy. Furthermore, Williams fails to acknowledge the Americans who would not place themselves into the two small pigeon holes used to control political outcomes.

10. Williams says, “Beyond lower taxes and less government, he has literally nothing in common with conservatives and even his smaller government leanings can’t work in a socially and morally bankrupt society.”

Within this statement Williams demonstrates Neo-Con ideology, wittingly or not. Williams says that Paul’s “smaller government leanings can’t work in a socially and morally bankrupt society.” This should warn every reader of a dangerous political philosophy.
Williams says that since “America is socially and morally bankrupt,” the federal government must be big and strong enough to police the United States because without it, America would decay into anarchy and chaos.

Williams’ suggested constitutional model was rejected in 1787 at the constitutional convention and follows the argument advanced by advocates of a monarchy: that is, people of large populations are incapable of adequately governing themselves and require an executive to rule over every aspect of their lives.

It is for this reason that Ron Paul is doing so well throughout the country. Americans want a President who is willing to put power back into the hands of the people. It is called self-government.

11. Williams says, “Then we have the issue of white supremacists and anti-Semites in his past. Remember, Obama must run unopposed… and the U.S. press will tear Paul from limb to limb long before next November.”

Again, William acts as a “drive-by” media and throws out a loaded statement with no evidence or credible references to support his statement.

12. Williams’ says, “Voters who grasp the reality that the nation is on the brink of total collapse and the world is on the verge of WWIII, are looking for who can defeat Obama and who might have the backbone to protect the nation from eminent danger on several fronts. I’m not sure such a candidate exists in the 2012 election, but I am certain that Ron Paul isn’t it. Facts don’t have any friends, but so far, Paul fans don’t seem too impressed by facts. Paul is unqualified for the job he seeks on this single issue alone! His anti-Semitism and poor-pitiful misunderstood jihadists, blame America first and often rhetoric should be enough to end his campaign… but do the facts matter anymore?”

Williams recognizes that the United States is in serious trouble, but he ironically fails to recognize that much of our troubles derive from a corrupted monetary system and the only candidate calling this fact out is Ron Paul. If there is a premier problem, it is in the area of economics and finance—a fruit of a bitter root most politicians are not willing to address.

Above all, Ron Paul is a proven statesman in this area and has identified the root of the counterfeiters and the evils within economic and financial institutions of the United States and World banks. Paul knows what it will take to rid us of these wrongs and to put America back on the path of social and financial-economic prosperity. It will take Ron Paul as President and governors in the States who recognize these matters to restore America to where it should and must be for a successful future.

If Williams does not recognize the seriousness of our monetary problems and Ron Paul’s obvious and fitting statesmanship and accuracy in this area, then it is no wonder he does not like Ron Paul.

Williams needs to know that Ron Paul only started what will continue until remedy is made in the matters of corrupted economics and finance, unjust foreign entanglement, and unconstitutional governance. Talk all you want about “social conservatism” and “military strength,” the United States will not be able to adequately solve and resolve any of major problems on any level without an economy to fund it.

Upon Williams’ conclusion, he makes a reference to “facts,” yet he barely refers to one fact in his entire article, which is based upon presumptions, presuppositions, mischaracterizations, and generalizations—without even a hyperlink to direct the reader to learn more about what Ron Paul would do as President.

I ask Williams the same question he asks, “do the facts matter anymore?,” with an additional question, “does the United States Constitution matter anymore?”

Please see more of Mr. Baldwin’s work and his latest book– Romans 13: The True Meaning of Submission

Tim Baldwin will be a guest on Revolution Radio, Thursday evening January 12, 2012, starting at 9 pm eastern

*****

And, what if the powers that be are lying to you about Ron Paul?

Sick Rantorum

©2012 drkate

Our government

We are in the most serious Constitutional Crisis of our lifetimes, and the so-called conservatives keep leaping from one politician to another until those politicians are also exposed as betraying the Constitution.  No principles, only politics.

The latest to ‘vault’ to an ‘overwhelming media lead’ is Rick Santorum who has the dubious distinction of being just one of the most corrupt politicians in America, and one of the most corrupt senators in his brief so-called ‘representation’ of Pennsylvania–when he didn’t even live there.  Here’s another hard-hitting Ron Paul ad, exposing him along with Gingrich:

From a great patriot, David LaRoque, as quoted by The Steady Drip:

When we have an ineligible president, an unconstitutional monetary system, unconstitutional czars, unresponsive elected representatives, a thoroughly corrupt federal court system, undeclared wars in violation of the Constitution, an unconstitutional tax system, numerous federal agencies and departments that undertake roles far exceeding the limitations of the Constitution, serious and growing abridgement of specific constitutional rights originating from our Creator and guaranteed by the Constitution, unconstitutional infringement of the rights and prerogatives of the states on a massive scale, unconstitutional land grabs by an out-of-control federal government, outrageous abuses of governmental powers in a wide variety of areas (including the infamous TSA operation, the EPA, the IRS, the DHS, the ATF, the DEA, the CIA, the FBI, the Forest Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service as examples), a socialist welfare scheme that is both unconstitutional and is bankrupting the country, no federal budget for three years running, a “First Lady” who desires to be addressed as “Your Excellency” and has a personal staff paid for by the taxpayers as large as some small agencies, an administration overrun with individuals committed by their Marxist political philosophy to the overthrow of the Constitution and the rule of law, a so-called “Congressional Research Service” which manufactures lies intended to deceive the American people, a Department of Justice that is so corrupt that it defies comprehension and acts as if it is above the law, a corrupt Congress whose members openly exploit their positions of trust for personal financial and political gain, a Supreme Court with members who brazenly defy the obligation of recusal in the face of outrageous conflicts of interest, a Speaker of the House who proclaims that a bill must be passed before we can find out what is in it, unconstitutional “government sponsored enterprises” (including FNMA and Freddie Mac) which have incurred huge losses arising from politically-motivated policies and which losses were borne by the taxpayers while virtually destroying large sectors of the national economy, the passage of a plainly unconstitutional health care bill which will almost certainly destroy what is left of the economic vitality of the nation and insure the descent of the nation into a fiscal abyss from which there can be no recovery, election fraud on a massive scale, and on and on – well we just don’t have much of a Constitution left, in my opinion.

I would add that this administration is loaded with Muslims who intend on destroying America–the U.S. Military, the Department of Homeland Security, the White House, the Justice Department, and the Energy Department.

We have a spineless military command that wrings its hands instead of taking action as Obama shares our most precious military hardware with our enemies, conducts unlawful activities every single day, and destroys our economy.

Another liberal idiot in Robert Reich demonstrates how anti-God and morally bankrupt he and his communist-by-proxy comrades truly are:

“The great conflict of the 21st century will not be between the West and terrorism. Terrorism is a tactic, not a belief. The true battle will be between modern civilization and anti-modernists; between those who believe in the primacy of the individual and those who believe that human beings owe their allegiance and identity to a higher authority; between those who give priority to life in this world and those who believe that human life is mere preparation for an existence beyond life; between those who believe in science, reason, logic and those who believe that truth revealed through Scripture and religious dogma. Terrorism will disrupt and destroy lives. But terrorism itself is not the greatest danger we face.”

We are at the point where the only ‘candidates’ that Americans can trust are the write-ins, or soon to be write-ins, like Ron Paul, Montgomery Blair Sibley, John Dummet, Sarah Palin, and others.  We have every reason to throw them all out, but wring our hands or fight over political position, as the false patriots continue to paint themselves as saviors.
This is the turning point, and its not looking favorable for America.  We cannot expect anyone to save us from this disaster, it is in part of our own making, although there are some fine efforts right now to make Obama stumble.  Get right with your Creator-God as soon as you can, you need Him in more ways than you can imagine.

The Politicians’ Betrayal of America

©2012 drkate

They are about to find out that ignorance is not bliss, it is instead the betrayal of America. 

Vote for America, not a Politician

The true intention of the GOP, their candidates, their minions, and their so-called “Tea Party”–yes, Tea Party, the GOP now owns you– have become so clear in the last two years–they all want the current corrupt system to remain the same.  Aside from the corruption, the blindness, and the ignorance, I conclude they’ve forgotten entirely what this Country is supposed to be about, and who makes a true leader.  Its like rearranging the chairs on the deck of the Titanic.

Here is a reminder of the kind of person a true Constitutionalist, a true Conservative  and a true American should vote for.

A Statesman loves the Constitution
A Politician hates (or is afraid of) the Constitution
 
A Statesman enforces the Constitution.
A Politician violates the Constitution.
 
A Statesman uses truth to keep power in the hands of the people.
A Politician uses lies to gain power over the people.
 
A Statesman‘s primary concern is to secure freedom for future generations.
A Politician’s primary concern is to get elected or re-elected.
 
A Statesman will not play politics with the people’s money.
A Politician will buy votes with tax money.
 
A Statesman knows the people must control government.
A Politician believes that government should control people.
 
A Statesman knows the people must limit government’s power to tax.
A Politician believes government should have unlimited power to tax.
 
A Statesman gives his allegiance to the people and country.
A Politician gives his allegiance to government.
 
A Statesman will demand a balanced budget.
A Politician will spend money stolen from future generations(deficit spending).
 
A Statesman will cause peace.
A Politician will cause wars.

Do NOT tell me you are a ‘constitutional conservative’ and vote for Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Huntsman, or Bachman.  They are wolves in elephant’s clothing.  Ah yes, Miss Tea Party Bachman voted for the NDAA…so I guess you’ll have your Tea Party organization inside the FEMA camps?

The conservatives who have found themselves in intentional ignorance are about to find out that their actions betray their children, the future, and America.


April 2014
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,643,999 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 605 other followers