Introduction by drkate
In the long battle to determine the eligibility of Barack Obama under Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution, there are many unsung heroes whose work has articulated, in great detail, the basis for constitutional eligibility, the proven the forgeries of documents, and the fraudulent methods Obama has used to avoid proving himself.
One of these heroes is jbjd, who has spent months researching and articulating various legal strategies to get at the issue of eligibility. While several high profile cases and authors have used jbjd’s work, few have actually applied the information correctly; some cases have been dismissed as a result, and some authors have missed entirely that key recommendations are state-specific, type of client- specific and not applicable on a nation-wide basis.
After many months of arduous research, and several key related articles, jbjd has zeroed in on a viable strategy for citizens of specific states to implement. I am pleased to present this must read article, in the hopes that a reader out there will pick this up and run with it!
© 2009 jbjd
Just because none of us knows whether Barack Obama is a Natural Born Citizen does not mean, he is not a Natural Born Citizen; but if a state Attorney General supports charges of election fraud against the Democratic Party for swearing he is a Natural Born Citizen without ascertaining whether this is true, this does mean, he should be facing Articles of Impeachment.
Question: In states that require the candidate for POTUS whose name is printed on the general election ballot to be Constitutionally eligible for the job, if a state Attorney General finds that a member of the Democratic Party committed election fraud by signing and submitting to state election officials a Certification of Nomination for Barack Obama as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States without first ascertaining whether he was Constitutionally eligible for the job; does this mean, he is not Constitutionally eligible for the job?
Answer: No. It means the U.S. House of Representatives must send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for prosecution.
Let me explain.
As spelled out with particularity in the complaints of election fraud filed with state A’sG in applicable states, between June 2008, when Mr. Obama admitted in Fight the Smears (”FTS”) that questions existed as to his citizenship status; and August 2008, when NP or the state D party Chairs signed the Certification delivered to state elections officials to put his name on the general election ballot, the only basis in the public record for authenticating he was even born in the U.S.A. was provided by Annenberg Political Fact Check (”APFC”). Therefore, a finding of election fraud means, if NP et al. relied on these representations provided by APFC to base their sworn Certifications BO is Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS, such evidence is insufficient to prove he is a NBC.
Let me say that another way. Since only APFC appears in the public record to support BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS at the time party officials Certified such qualification to the states; and since state A’sG found no basis for such Certification then, APFC authentication fails to establish BO is a NBC.
It is this implicit finding that APFC fails to establish BO is a NBC, which triggers Articles of Impeachment.
Question: Why does eliminating APFC as a credible source to authenticate BO’s Constitutional eligibility to be POTUS trigger Articles of Impeachment?
Answer: Because when petitioned by Constituents to forestall ratification of the Electoral College vote for Barack Obama for President based on questions as to his Constitutional eligibility for the job, members of the U.S. House of Representatives (as well as the U.S. Senate) admitted they believed such concerns for authenticity were unfounded based solely on the reassurances they had obtained from APFC.
Thus, at least for these several members of Congress who corresponded to their Constituents, eliminating this dubious source for such authentication means, no basis exists in fact to determine they ratified a vote for a POTUS who is a NBC. But since they did ratify the EC vote and, BO swore the Constitutionally required Oath of Office then, the Constitution provides he can now be removed from office by means of the Articles of Impeachment.