THE END GAME

©2009 jbjd

Introduction by drkate

In the long battle to determine the eligibility of Barack Obama under Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution, there are many unsung heroes whose work has articulated, in great detail, the basis for constitutional eligibility, the proven the forgeries of documents, and the fraudulent methods Obama has used to avoid proving himself.

One of these heroes is jbjd, who has spent months researching and articulating various legal strategies to get at the issue of eligibility.  While several high profile cases and authors have used jbjd’s work, few have actually applied the information correctly; some cases have been dismissed as a result, and some authors have missed entirely that key recommendations are  state-specific, type of client- specific and not applicable on a nation-wide basis.

After many months of arduous research, and several key related articles,  jbjd has zeroed in on a viable strategy for citizens of specific states to implement.   I am pleased to present this must read article, in the hopes that a reader out there will pick this up and run with it!

THE END GAME

© 2009 jbjd

Just because none of us knows whether Barack Obama is a Natural Born Citizen does not mean, he is not a Natural Born Citizen; but if a state Attorney General supports charges of election fraud against the Democratic Party for swearing he is a Natural Born Citizen without ascertaining whether this is true, this does mean, he should be facing Articles of Impeachment.

Question: In states that require the candidate for POTUS whose name is printed on the general election ballot to be Constitutionally eligible for the job, if a state Attorney General finds that a member of the Democratic Party committed election fraud by signing and submitting to state election officials a Certification of Nomination for Barack Obama as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States without first ascertaining whether he was Constitutionally eligible for the job; does this mean, he is not Constitutionally eligible for the job?

Answer: No. It means the U.S. House of Representatives must send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for prosecution.

Let me explain.

As spelled out with particularity in the complaints of election fraud filed with state A’sG in applicable states, between June 2008, when Mr. Obama admitted in Fight the Smears (”FTS”) that questions existed as to his citizenship status; and August 2008, when NP or the state D party Chairs signed the Certification delivered to state elections officials to put his name on the general election ballot, the only basis in the public record for authenticating he was even born in the U.S.A. was provided by Annenberg Political Fact Check (”APFC”). Therefore, a finding of election fraud means, if NP et al. relied on these representations provided by APFC to base their sworn Certifications BO is Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS, such evidence is insufficient to prove he is a NBC.

Let me say that another way. Since only APFC appears in the public record to support BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS at the time party officials Certified such qualification to the states; and since state A’sG found no basis for such Certification then, APFC authentication fails to establish BO is a NBC.

It is this implicit finding that APFC fails to establish BO is a NBC, which triggers Articles of Impeachment.

Question: Why does eliminating APFC as a credible source to authenticate BO’s Constitutional eligibility to be POTUS trigger Articles of Impeachment?

Answer: Because when petitioned by Constituents to forestall ratification of the Electoral College vote for Barack Obama for President based on questions as to his Constitutional eligibility for the job, members of the U.S. House of Representatives (as well as the U.S. Senate) admitted they believed such concerns for authenticity were unfounded based solely on the reassurances they had obtained from APFC.

Thus, at least for these several members of Congress who corresponded to their Constituents, eliminating this dubious source for such authentication means, no basis exists in fact to determine they ratified a vote for a POTUS who is a NBC. But since they did ratify the EC vote and, BO swore the Constitutionally required Oath of Office then, the Constitution provides he can now be removed from office by means of the Articles of Impeachment.

38 Responses to “THE END GAME”


  1. 1 drkate September 27, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    Wow. I can appreciate all the work you did to get to this point, and thank you for letting me cross-post.

    For the readers, it is critical to look at jbjd’s articles, linked in the site, “Nothing less than a treason”, parts 1 & 2.

    Here are two questions:

    1. Is there a statute of limitations on this, have we missed the boat?
    2. Given that McCain was probably not an NBC either, we had an election where the 2 candidates were not NBCs. Could we ever nullify that based on successful concerns raised at the state AG level?

    • 2 jbjd September 27, 2009 at 3:47 pm

      First, the answer to question 2). No; it really did not matter whose name was on the general election ballot. Remember, the purpose of the general election is for the states to “appoint” Electors, as required by the Constitution. Only, most state ballots are set up to print the name of the nominee and not the names of the Electors proposed by the political party. 1) The concept of a statute of limitations would apply more routinely to a challenge that a candidate should not have had his or name printed on the ballot. This is a criminal charge of election fraud. The statute of limitations is more than 13 (thirteen) months, which is the time between the submission of the faulty Certification of Nomination to state officials; and the investigation by the AG and, hopefully, the filing of charges against the suspect parties. (Of course, if people then want to file civil charges against the wrongdoers – I will be addressing this issue, especially with regard to pledged delegates in vote binding states – they usually have 2 (two) years to file a civil complaint. Plenty of time.)

      • 3 drkate September 27, 2009 at 3:51 pm

        Excellent, thank you. That’s right, thanks for the reminder, and someone will write that book that discusses the election of 2008 in america in which 2 non-NBCs ran for president!

        I missed this was a criminal complaint, and good to know the sol is 13 months. Still, time is flying. Hope someone really gets on this. I would, but I don’t live in any of the key states.

        • 4 jbjd September 27, 2009 at 6:13 pm

          I do not stress the fact, the AG would be conducting a criminal investigation because it does not concern my analysis of the resulting Impeachment. Also, I just want to clarify, I did not say, the statute of limitations on election fraud is 13 months; I said, it is more than 13 months, which is the time that has passed since the Certifications were delivered to the states and, these citizen complaints were filed with state A’sG.

    • 5 susan h September 29, 2009 at 12:34 pm

      Why was McCain not a “natural born citizen”? I understood him to be the child of two American citizens of a military family born on a naval base outside of the U.S. Obama and McCain have totally different issues, and McCain’s citizenship is not an issue.

  2. 6 alforhill50 September 27, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    drkate. Maybe I am just paranoid or too distrustful of this administration, but with the arrests of these “so called terrorist” this past week or so something just appears to me unseemly about the whole thing. I can’t put my finger on why. It’s as though, it is a timely distraction from what we should really be focused on. The fellow the FBI tricked in Texas and allowed him to plant a fake car bomb. Is this not the same FBI that has been so complacent in BO’s crimes and misdemeanors in Chicago and pay to play schemes and all the other ones in high places. Where have they been, they, the CIA, Patrick Fizzledout after capturing the all alone guilty Gov of IL, Blagoavich with a “sting” operation.

    What good are our efforts if noone is willing to take the ball and carry it across the finish line and get him out of the Office of the President before he destroys our beautiful country with his “words, just words.” Everytime he opens his mouth, he trashes America the beautiful. How can you impeach someone when everyone is covering his a– and spewing if you say that or do this you are a racist. Now Bill Clinton has joined the fray.

  3. 8 Quantum Leap September 27, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    Let Bill flap his lips about the “vast right-wing conspiracy” against Obama. He was part of the election fraud set-up. He and his wife collected money, time and support from me and 18 million others who were punked. Clintons were called racists by the obamas but the fix was in and they were in on it. They know Oblowhard is not a natural born citizen and the violation of the constitution. Bill is being used by FraudO. Bill LIES too.
    Without our recent past support Bill would still be primarily remembered as the old man slob who got his ‘nut’ in the whitehouse by a college girl.
    Everytime people look at him they have an image of an aged adult getting ‘serviced’ by a college girl and him getting on TV and telling Americans he didn’t get it on with her. The Clintons hate Republicans and are the most partisan of anyone who’s ever come down the pike. And his wife selling us out at the Denver convention was sickening. Don’t get me started. Done! Now why isn’t congress taking care of business and is still allowing a usurper to be in the whitehouse?
    What is wrong with these people?

  4. 11 Quantum Leap September 27, 2009 at 11:14 pm

    Again….what is wrong with this administration and minions? Are they all mentally ill?

    (At least Chancellor Merkel won again.She slapped the socialst dems of her country in the face)

  5. 14 Quantum Leap September 27, 2009 at 11:25 pm

    Oh, I didn’t want to miss mentioning that Acorn is busted. The indictment is in. Let’s see for how long..the chickens are coming home to roost for Pelosi, Reid, obama and Acorn.

    Go to Free Republic to catch the skinny on todays news about this indictment.

    And TD, and a handful of others who started this Acorn probe with the eggin’ on by displaced democrats have succeeded……It’s viral. All the hard work paid off. Too bad one of them didn’t get to see this outcome since she passed over recently.

  6. 21 Walt1 September 28, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    Hat tip JBJD. You are a great American!

    • 22 jbjd September 28, 2009 at 6:20 pm

      Thank you. I do my best. Now, I hate to look a gift horse in the mouth, but, please, my initials are small, “jbjd.” JB Williams from the neo-Nazi rag, CFP, steals my work; and even though people who have followed my work for over a year have said, they would know my work in a blindfold test, I want to minimize the chances, my posts are ever confused with his (plagiarized versions of my posts).

  7. 23 NewEnglandPatriot September 28, 2009 at 10:32 pm

    Nancy Pelosi signed two different forms of the party certification document. One had the “constitutional eligibility” wording on it and went to the state of Hawaii; the other lacked that wording and was sent to the other 49 states, according to WorldNetDaily via J.B. Williams.

    It would therefore seem that Hawaii is the only state wherein charges could be brought to the attorney general and prosecuted, although certainly by now, the attorneys general in the other 49 states must realize that they were either duped or complicit in this enormous deception of the American people.

    • 24 drkate September 28, 2009 at 10:37 pm

      NE Patriot, JB Williams got his work from jbjd…and there are only 4 states I believe wherein a complaint of election fraud would be valid, given each state’s different proceedings. The background material at jbjd’s site will give you the information that only the original author of the idea has.

      this is what i meant by using the information properly in my introductory note. It is essential that people realize this is state-specific, and HI is not the only state.

    • 25 jbjd September 29, 2009 at 8:15 am

      If you conclude HI is the only state in which a member of the DNC or a D state party Chair can be charged with election fraud, you fail to understand the work. Any one of the complaints I already drafted and posted is viable: TX, GA, SC, VA, and HI. There are other states in which such complaints can be filed, with laws similar to those found in these 5 (five) states. The fraud cannot be found in swearing someone is Constitutionally eligible for POTUS when he is not. Indeed, the front of the complaint explicitly disclaims, these complaints take no position on whether BO is a NBC. Rather, the complaints are based on the fact that, in these applicable states, the law says the candidate must be eligible; and the party operatives swore he was, without first ascertaining whether this was true. (Take a look at the TX complaint; in that state, the D party Chair also signed 2 (two) Certifications.)

      Democracy is not a spectator sport. You have to do the leg work to preserve this Constitutional Republic.

  8. 26 Kay September 28, 2009 at 10:43 pm

    Dr. Kate,
    I looked for your lik on Jd…he/she’s page and you weren’t there
    Get your credit! I absolutely Luv ya!
    But you give credit…How’s bout you get some????

    • 27 drkate September 28, 2009 at 10:51 pm

      awwww…shucks, thank you! 😳

    • 28 jbjd September 29, 2009 at 8:04 am

      I read posts from the bottom up, so I already corrected your misinformation, in your comment below. The link to drkate’s blog has been there since she began her blog. And it still works.

    • 29 jbjd September 29, 2009 at 8:08 am

      Now, I get it. You refuse to use my real screen name, “jbjd.” For some reason, it would appear you are intentionally ‘confusing’ my identity with “JB Williams,” who plagiarized my work and posted it in diluted form for CFP, founded by neo-Nazi Douglas Hagmann. They, as well as you, miss the nuances of the work, because you failed to put in the time to understand it. Or, you just never read the original but only the stolen copy.

  9. 30 Kay September 28, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    Dr. Kate
    What can we do NOW to start campaigning for 20010?
    I think we need to get ahead of the Bullshit?
    If I am correct on this, they already have a plan for a fraudulent election?
    I want to get on board to protect 2010!
    I want them OUT!!!!

    • 31 drkate September 28, 2009 at 11:54 pm

      That is THE question! continental congress 2009, there is more, still wading through. we have to keep up the good fight!

  10. 33 Kay September 28, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    jb…jd? w/e you really should have a link for Dr. Kate on your page…I visited yours and was surprised every link you have id back to your OWN page….what say you?

    • 34 jbjd September 29, 2009 at 8:01 am

      You left this same note on my blog and, now that I understand what you are talking about, I will delete the message. I just tried the link I had posted to drkate’s blog; and I wound up here.

  11. 35 Kay September 28, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    GOD BLESS the peoples who are trying to get USA back to OUR HOME..
    Dr. Kate, you are such a patriot and for this I give you major Kudos’s ….Thank You!
    BTW….You are an AWESOME writer but sooo Humble…I applaud you!

  12. 38 drkate September 29, 2009 at 8:37 am

    jbjd—now I am thinking about Nancy Pelosi–as speaker, could she be removed as well for this fraud? And, if the house has to present articles of impeachment, would NP be barred from controlling the debate or getting those articles filed?


Comments are currently closed.



September 2009
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,853,736 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS The Post & Email

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

%d bloggers like this: