©2009 drkate

The_Thinker-webMuch of the writing on who Obama is and what his agenda entails has defined  Obama’s actions within various revolutionary frameworks:  Marxism, socialism, fascism, black liberation theology, and radical Islam.

To a large extent, Obama embodies elements of each of these ideologies: his economic policies are decidedly socialist; his focus on himself as the savior and his draconian threats  is fascist; and his apologies for America are central to black liberation theology and to radical Islam.

In my view, what all of these revolutionary ideologies have in common is that they are at their core anti-American, and following close behind, anti-American capitalism.

Reflecting on the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize and what actions Obama has taken, it strikes me that the NPP Committee was rewarding Obama’s anti-Americanism and his socialist policies. And knowing Obama’s ego would not permit him to decline an award for diplomacy (after all, that implies actual leadership 🙄 ) the NPP Committee ties the hands of the President of the United States on military matters.

chess_board2cBut as Logistics Monster points out, when something like this comes out of left field, it can be a gift: it illuminates the kinds of forces we are up against, both internally and internationally.

The purpose of this post is to look at what’s playing on the board of anti-Americanism internally, and how an international event such as the NPP award is intended to move the sleepers pawns  and the Messiahs knights, Bishops and Kings on this board.

Some Definitions

By moving to describe ‘anti-Americanism’ is in no way intended to diminish the validity of the analysis and application of revolutionary ideology to Obama and the importance of continuing this research.  Importantly, the thread of anti-Americanism offers a useful ‘platform’ that may enhance these discussions and help identify useful strategies.

The essential character of anti-Americanism is to view America as

..some sort of collective entity, not a nation of individuals, and the qualities of the governing class must be attributed to the people at large…

Here is the  starting point for anti-Americanism: to denigrate the concept of individual liberties, and a government serving the people.  The actions of the ‘governing class’

Those who genuinely hate America, and all it stands for, good or bad, suffer a collectivist mentality of hatred for a country, its traditions and its people, that can be just as obnoxious and insidious as racism or any other such collectivism

Gregory continues on anti-Americanism with the example of Ward Churchill, former professor at the University of Colorado:

The very few extremists who thought that the victims of 9/11 deserved what they got were voicing anti-Americanism.  Ward Churchill stood as a paragon of this rare breed of malcontents when he compared the innocent businessmen who died in the World Trade Center to ‘little Eichmanns”. Those who believe that every American is directly responsible for the real and perceived sins of his government, and for the ravishing of the earth at the maw of what they view as predatory global capitalism, are also usually anti-American.

The film presented in an earlier article is an example of this blaming of America for all the ravaging of the earth.

In discussing both the extreme left and the extreme right, the author notes that both have their inherent anti-Americanism:

Both nationalist warmongers and anti-American agitators agree that the U.S. government exists as a symbol and representation of the people and the economy of the country it dominates…the anti-Americans agree with the nationalists that the essential character of American cannot be separated from the ruling regime’s foreign policy.

And the ruling regime’s foreign policy is most often associated with the United States Armed Forces.

Where did this Originate?

I notice that both the extreme left and the extreme right call each-other ‘anti-American’, and this has served to somewhat ‘neutralize’ the true danger and insidious nature of this ideology. Where did this come from?

As background, we know that there has been a deliberate attempt by the KGB to infiltrate and disrupt the American thought system, and that a few ‘sleepers’ have emerged as leading this chaos.  Within that context, there has been America’s own evolution, unsuspecting for the most part(?), of its own essential self-doubt.

An interesting article by Daniel Pipes, of the Jerusalem Post, attributes this internal anti-Americanism to the assassination of John F. Kennedy.  First it involved ‘deleting Oswald from the narrative’, by

ignoring his communist outlook by characterizing him as an extreme rightist. Thus, New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison asserted that “Oswald would have been more at home with Mein Kampf than Das Kapital.

Citing a book written by James Piereson,

With Oswald nearly deleted from the narrative, or even turned into a scapegoat, the ruling establishment…proceeded to take a second, astonishing step. They blamed the assassination not on Oswald the communist but on the American people, and the radical right in particular, accusing them of killing Kennedy for his being too soft in the cold war or too accommodating to civil rights for American blacks.

Blame it on the American people! 😯  Piereson cites four examples of that wild distortion:

  • Chief Justice Earl Warren decried the supposed “hatred and bitterness that has been injected into the life of our nation by bigots.”
  • Senate majority leader Mike Mansfield raged against “the bigotry, the hatred, prejudice and the arrogance which converged in that moment of horror to strike him down.”
  • Congressman Adam Clayton Powell advised, “Weep not for Jack Kennedy, but weep for America.”
  • A New York Times editorial lamented “The shame all America must bear for the spirit of madness and hate that struck down President John F. Kennedy.”

A very turbulent 1960’s ensued, along with Vietnam and social revolution.  At this time period, the Cloward-Piven strategy was also being used as the anti-war movement grew and the ‘welfare state’ expanded.  Makes you wonder who the ‘sleepers’ really were and who they are now.

And doesn’t this distortion sound familiar to you today, as American citizens are labeled racists, bigots, and un-American?

American Self-Doubt

There are several essays on anti-Americanism in Victor Davis Hanson’s Between War and Peace that are well worth the read, and a few excerpts are presented here.

On the theme of anti-Americanism, Hanson notes–as do researchers above– that the association of individuals in a country with the actions of its government is the basis of anti-Americanism, and conversely, allows our government to do things cause us self-doubt.  The ‘hatred of a country’ permitted (and permits) the large scale bombing of civilian populations, which became a major reason for American self-doubt and hatred.

Hanson strongly criticizes that liberals are more concerned about what Muslims think about us, and that their rights are protected in prisons, than the needs of our soldiers and the regions the military has stabilized (successes).

“Rather than creating new programs to teach others about America, I would prefer that our government instruct Americans about the exceptional history of America, reinvigorate civic education in the schools, explain that racism, sexism and prejudice are endemic in the human species–but under the American system of government can be identified discussed, and then ameliorated.  If we could instill in our citizens a tragic rather than therapeutic sense of the world, they would understand that utopia is not possible on this earth but that the Constitution and institutions of the Untied States are man’s best hope for eradicating the evil and ignorance that plague us all…”

On the Nobel Peace Prize and Anti-Americanism

I started this article before the NPP was awarded because I wanted to get at the persistent but pernicious theme of anti-Americanism that does plague the left, generally, Congress, our schools and universities, and the media.  Then my first reaction to the 2009 NPP award was that it rewarded anti-Americanism.  If I was biased in my first reaction, I think the research here bears it out.

From a 2007 article in the UK times on line:

There’s another, more important aspect to the world’s affection for those in America who are most critical of it. The Americans who win global approbation in Oslo or at the UN are not simply critics of current American policy. They want to construct an international system that will for ever prevent the US from pursuing its own objectives, a system designed to dilute, counterbalance and constrain America’s ability to govern itself. They prefer a world in which American democracy is subordinated to a kind of global government, rule by a global elite, tasked to make decisions on everyone’s behalf in the name of multilateralism.

In other words, the New World Order types, European socialists, and UN global governance.

Hanson sums it up nicely:

More seriously, the Obama Prize represents two recent larger Nobel trends: 1) an effort to curtail American foreign policy in favor of international deference (as in the case of rewarding Carter and Gore for their defamation of Bush in their opposition to Iraq); 2) a general disconnect from accomplishment in favor of leftist intentions, as in the case of Elbaradei or Rogaberta Menchu who accomplished essentially nothing (and spoke or wrote about that nothing in suspect fashion), but were a hit among international Western elites as authentically anti-Western non-Westerns.

Think of the tiny Norway’s Machiavellianism: A utopian American President is now supported for his rhetoric—and yet also sent a signal that brave new Nobel Prize laureates simply don’t support Israel, pressure Iran, stay in Afghanistan or Iraq, or keep open Guantanamo. It is as if that Oslo is saying ‘our man in Washington’ is, well, now really ‘our man in Washington.’

18 Responses to “Anti-Americanism”

  1. 1 susan h October 12, 2009 at 9:34 am

    Dear Dr. Kate: Thank you for explaining to us just what Obama’s anti-Americanism is all about. It all makes perfect sense given his Indonesian upbringing, his foreign heritage, his training in black liberation theology under the infamous Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his internal struggle of black vs. white, and being mentored by the likes of Bill Ayers, Rashid Khalidi and others who hate America, hate Israel, and hate whites.

    Obama winning the Nobel peace prize has highlighted his lack of qualifications to so many people who probably voted for him as president. Did they not realize he lacked qualifications when they voted him in, that they were just voting for him due to his color and not because he had actually done anything? These same people did not seem to care when he was running for president, yet are outraged that he received a nobel prize so early in his career. Yet he received the presidency way too early in his career and the lack of experience, understanding of issues is painfully apparent every day, but everyone is afraid to point that out, yet not afraid to point out that he is not ready to receive the Nobel peace prize. Why the double standard? I wonder: Those people who are admitting that giving Obama the peace prize lowered its standard, are they ready to admit that giving Obama the U.S. Presidency has lowered its standard as well?

    • 2 drkate October 12, 2009 at 10:05 am

      Excellent point Susan. The double standards, and yes, I feel like they are unwilling to admit the stupidity of their own vote, so they take it out on Europe. It seems like the intellectually bankrupt left is in a quandry.

    • 3 d2i October 12, 2009 at 11:01 am

      Try Papua, New Guinea. Indonesia, Kenya and Hawaii are all myths perpetrated to distract us. Do yourself a favor and don’t fall for it anymore. Once you allow yourself not to think in that direction, you’ll begin to clearly see the rues and how we’ve all been played.

    • 5 Renee October 12, 2009 at 7:46 pm

      Good point Susan. Very good point.

  2. 6 d2i October 12, 2009 at 10:56 am

    These words say it all “Much of the writing on who Obama is and what his agenda entails has defined Obama’s actions within various revolutionary frameworks: Marxism, socialism, fascism, black liberation theology, and radical Islam.

    To a large extent, Obama embodies elements of each of these ideologies: his economic policies are decidedly socialist; his focus on himself as the savior and his draconian threats is fascist; and his apologies for America are central to black liberation theology and to radical Islam.”

    You’ve nailed it. This fraud and his puppet masters have every intention to rule over “We the People” and they will fail. Miserably, I might add.

    The sheer chutzpah and hubris these dirty thugs display will be the very thing that will pummel them. When they fall and they will. We must do everything necessary to stomp out and cleanse this country of their evil doings. Clean all of the Party’s and their masters out from top to bottom. I don’t care about their wealth. I don’t care about their vision. I don’t care about their politics.

    I want ALL of them locked up for life at Alcatraz and NO I do not want to spend the first dollar to rehab the structure either. Let them live their days in squalor as they wished for We the People to do. Especially those involved with the Chicago Olympic debacle. Let these all knowing yahoo’s live under the slum conditions they forced on the poor in Southside Chicago. And let them have to see photo’s everyday all day of each soul they stole from their mother’s clutches.

    I am a proud American. And I stand with all of those who love this country and refuse to accept the farcical nonsense emanating from the land now known as Oz.

  3. 7 bho boo October 12, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Wonderful succinct distillation of what makes Obama tick. NPP fed the ego that Copenhagen had started top put on a diet. Norway, Soros, Pelosi, media, others are narcissism enablers who need to keep that ego morbidly obese and bed-bound bed-panned and away from real mirrors. At the National Press Club Obama admitted he knew which side his bread was buttered on. He’ll never hit bottom because they just keep digging our well deeper for him.
    This guy…

    is controlled via his obsessive narcissim and addiction to accolades by this guy…

    I can just see the dynamic in the last photo, Obama is so full of himself he’s way high on endorphins and Soros knows this is how to control him. They all know. Obama being a sociopath utterly lacks any conscience, he flies from high to high, whether it be drugs, sex, or accolades, and he only knows to use his hate-based upbringing to get him to the next high.

  4. 8 mtngoat61 October 12, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    Did you all see this?


    The Federal Courts Are Committing Treason to the Constitution per Chief Justice John Marshall.

    The federal courts and judges are committing treason to the Constitution by not taking jurisdiction and getting to the merits in the various cases before them regarding the Article II eligibility clause question for Obama.

    It is worth keeping in mind the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall when he wrote in Cohens v. Virginia 19 US 264 (1821):

    “It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.”

    Link to the treason quote:

    Link to Summary:

    Link to Full Case:

    The Judge in the Kerchner v Obama & Congress lawsuit and the Judges in the other cases should simply read the words of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall from the past and take jurisdiction of the constitutional question of the Article II eligibility clause in the Constitution and proceed to a fact finding hearing and trial on the merits to see if Obama is Constitutionally eligible or not. I say Obama is NOT eligible. But we need the federal courts to take the cases and get a SCOTUS ruling to settle this.

    Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
    CDR USNR (Ret)
    Lead Plaintiff
    Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al

    • 9 drkate October 12, 2009 at 1:58 pm

      thank you MG. I am working on an article on Judicial Tyranny, and this fits right in. Thank you again.

  5. 10 kay October 12, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Misstickly aka terrik on in just minutes!
    Hope to see ya there!

  6. 11 Troy October 12, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    Dr. Kate, I would like to offer an early congrats on Saturday’s election…Way to go!

  1. 1 Tigers Twins Game « The Buzz Trackback on October 12, 2009 at 6:44 am
  2. 2 Obama Votes “Present” on Afghanistan « drkatesview Trackback on October 30, 2009 at 12:03 am
  3. 3 Nancy Pelosi is Obama’s “Al Capone” « drkatesview Trackback on December 2, 2009 at 10:42 am
  4. 4 Taking Stock « drkatesview Trackback on March 3, 2010 at 10:47 pm
  5. 5 OBAMA’S FALSE FLAG OCTOBER « drkatesview Trackback on October 3, 2010 at 10:49 pm
  6. 6 Obama Can’t Prove He’s American « drkatesview Trackback on December 28, 2010 at 1:27 am
  7. 7 Acts of War « drkatesview Trackback on July 5, 2011 at 10:45 pm
Comments are currently closed.

October 2009
« Sep   Nov »

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: