Madame Speaker, I Want an Answer

©2009 drkate

3dflags_usa0001-0002aNow that The Birthers busted wide-open the newspaper articles from the African press confirming Obama’s Kenyan citizenship, notice the deafening silence from the MSM, the delay and stall tactics of the courts, and Congress running off with the American pie.  (flag h/t

It is absolutely up to us Patriots to keep this going, to keep the pressure on.  Every day that Obama makes decisions is an attack on our Constitution, security, identity, and economy; the longer he stays in, the more the damage and the more we will have to undo.

Keep in mind that while the removal of Obama would certainly be disruptive, there are avenues for the peaceful removal of  Obama and maintenance of order in the country.

I have decided to try to put some pressure on public officials, and my own congressional delegation. As readers know, I have a special affiliation for Speaker Pelosi.  While I don’t want to tip her off, I want to start raising some serious questions about her leadership.

This post is the first of two that will both address the Speaker and the House and Senate Republican and democratic leadership.  I will be sending these directly, and also to my Congressional representatives asking them to get them to the leadership.


Subject:  Explanation Requested

Dear Madame Speaker:

Respectfully, it has been well over one year that I, and many other American citizens, have been asking you to document the proof you used to legally verify that Barack Hussein Obama satisfies the legal requirements for the Presidency as stated in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

To date, you have dismissed our requests as if your oath to the Constitution,  your duties as Speaker of the House, and your responsibilities as Co-Chair of the Democratic National Convention mean nothing.  Respectfully, I can no longer tolerate your silence, or mine.

I have enclosed, for your viewing pleasure,  one article from 2004 and several articles from 2008 that confirm Barack Obama was born in Kenya.  The African press, and recently an MSNBC reporter discussing Mr. Obama’s trip to Ghana, confirm that Mr. Obama was born in Kenya.  Here is a summary of the headlines of each story in case your schedule does not permit full review of the articles:

  • Kenya Sunday Standard headline — “Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”
  • The Nigerian Observer — “Americans will today go to the polls to elect their next President with Democratic Party candidate, Senator Barack Obama largely favoured to win.  The Kenyan-born Senator will…”
  • USAfrica — “Kenyan-born OBAMA makes history…wins presidential nomination of U. S. Democratic party; eyes on White House…”
  • — ” Little wonder then why Kenyan-born Barack Obama, America’s first Black President…”
  • — “For Ghana, Obama’s visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth.” The same article, with the same quote, appeared in
  • The Ghana Times — “So far, the odds favour the once underdog in American politics, Obama, the African-American Senator from Illinois state. A Congressional Quarterly (CQ) politics monitored on BBC put the Kenyan born American ahead of his rivel, John McCain.”

I do not understand how you, your staff, or the DNC could have missed these articles. Not being born on U.S. soil is clearly a disqualifying factor for the Presidency according to Article II. Surely you must know this as Speaker of the House, and as an American citizen yourself.

Instead, you and the DNC have relied upon “”, a ‘non-partisan’ organization funded by the Annenburg Fund–affiliated with Mr. Obama–and ‘twitter’ as your ‘vetting’ process.  A picture of a copy of a certification of live birth–not even a birth certificate–on the internet satisfied you that Mr. Obama was Constitutionally eligible?  Respectfully, Madame Speaker, that lacks any credibility at all, especially in light of other readily information that was available to you and your staff, and that is available today.

I have seen  you, other members of Congress from both parties, the media, and Mr. Obama himself try to ‘dumb down’ the issue of ‘natural born citizenship’ only to the issue of a birth certificate.  Hence your reliance on questionable internet documents,  and the almost willful ignorance of Mr. Obama’s stated admission of British citizenship at birth.

Mr. Obama’s adoption by an Indonesian citizen and his travel to Pakistan in 1981 when Americans were not permitted suggests multiple citizenship, which at least raises a question of his eligibility.  This should have been investigated by you and the DNC, but was not.  You never responded to inquiries from the American public, so we must assume you did nothing to investigate these issues.

Respectfully Madame Speaker, the American people have awakened and understand the danger to our national security resulting from an ineligible Commander-in-Chief.  We are shocked that you have demonstrated such callous disregard for the Constitution, your responsibilities, and the American people.  We are equally as shocked at the democratic enablers of this disregard in Congress.

I request an explanation of all the information you used to legally verify that Barack Hussein Obama was constitutionally eligible for the Presidency.  I also want to know why you have refused to disclose this information after more than a year of citizen requests, and after citizen research has shown Mr. Obama does not meet the eligibility requirements.

I have copied this letter to the House and Senate Republican and Democratic leadership with an additional request for an investigation into this matter.  I have also made this letter and additional correspondence available to the national press.

For me, this is the second shot over the bow of the good ship tugboat Pelosi. This furthers my goal of increasing  pressure on the Speaker to resign. Please help me sharpen this letter!

I plan to also write to the Judges in the case, enclosing these articles, and encourage readers to do so as well.  Please head on over to The Birthers,  find the addresses of the Judges in each of the cases, print out the articles  from the African press, and send them to the Judges.  If you would like to include with your letter any of the essays in this blog, drop me a line in the comment section.

34 Responses to “Madame Speaker, I Want an Answer”

  1. 1 Catherine Toornman October 20, 2009 at 12:56 am

    drkate – I came across a Kenyan parliament session from Nov 2008 while trying to find something out about this usurper – I copied it as a PDF and I think you might be interested in seeing it – as it sure raised my eyebrows – but I don’t know how to post a PDF for anyone to see. If you are interested in this, can you email me so that I may send it to you? I really think someone ought to see this thing as I’ve not seen anyone post anything like this yet but feel they would have if they’d have come across it – I just don’t know who to send it to or how to post a PDF –
    Thank you for your time

  2. 2 terminu October 20, 2009 at 5:41 am

    “Kenya born” or “Kenyan born” , both are ineligible.
    The Civil Rights Act of 1866 has never been overturned. US v Wong Kim Ark says no native born child of an alien can be a natural born citizen. Minor v Happersett says no 14th amendment citizen can be a natural born citizen. Minor also defines a natural born citizen as jus soli jus sanguinis (both parents). Barack Obama cosponsored SR511 which defines NBC requiring both parents being US citizens. John Bingham, the architect of the 14th amendment in the Congressional Record defined NBC as jus soli jus sanguinis (both parents). Craig v US says nobody can be assigned natural born citizen status it is a birthright of natural law, of no divided allegiances AT BIRTH to a particular nation.

  3. 3 jbjd October 20, 2009 at 7:23 am

    Nice work, drkate. People need to keep asking this same question of both NP and anyone else who signed Certifications of Nomination. I keep telling people, NP’s refusal to respond to voters’ requests for this information; along with the fact that requests sent to Alice Germond, Secretary of the DNC – she also signed those Official DNC Certifications of Nominations – were referred to then DNC General Counsel Sandler, who told voters, ‘We don’t have to tell you what documents we used to determine BO is Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS because we are not a public agency; points to the fraud. Election fraud. Because even if BO is a NBC, the D party could not legally swear this is so, without evidence of the truth of such statement. Not having this evidence means, in all of those states whose laws require the candidate whose name appears on the ballot, to be eligible for the job, they committed ballot fraud. Simple as that.

    • 4 drkate October 20, 2009 at 10:26 am

      I think Sandler’s response to requests for information is critical, as it does point to a reason why they would have to hide it. I think it would be good to work this into the letter to Pelosi, but especially in the letter to the house and senate leadership. Any ideas?

  4. 5 Loren October 20, 2009 at 8:13 am


    I’m working on a book about the Obama eligibility controversy, and I’d like to interview you for it. Please shoot me an e-mail to let me know if you’re interested, and we’ll go from there.


  5. 6 No-nonsense-nancy October 20, 2009 at 8:14 am

    Thanks, Dr. Kate, this is very important. I’ll send some letters also.

    I’ve been trying to find out the final results of the voting for delegates to Continental Congress 2009. They haven’t had them posted but they were supposed to have them on Sunday. All I can find are the preliminary votes from the voting centers, not the final vote with the mail-ins. Are the final votes in yet?

    • 7 drkate October 20, 2009 at 10:27 am

      Nancy, I’ve been checking every day, too. Apparently they are going to wait until the end of the week, to deal with snail mail, etc.

  6. 8 Rosemary Woodhouse October 20, 2009 at 9:00 am

    “Respectfully Madame Speaker, the American people have awaken and understand the danger to our national security resulting from an ”

    Should read have AWAKENED.

  7. 10 Miri October 20, 2009 at 10:29 am

    Dr. Kate: My personal favorite is the one from NPR:

    • 11 drkate October 20, 2009 at 10:31 am


    • 12 cbro October 20, 2009 at 5:41 pm

      the npr “listen” only has intro then quits. Anyone know a link to an embedded recording?

      • 13 Jan October 21, 2009 at 8:12 am

        There is a transcript button to the side of the player. I got to listen to the whole interview and the transcript is exact.

        Here is the pertinent part: (Martin is the show host)

        MARTIN: Yes. Finally, I wanted to ask you on a son of Africa, Barack Obama, is a poised to – at least have the opportunity to become the next president of the United States. How does this campaign look overseas?

        QUIST-ARCTON: You know, it has absolutely fired the imagination, not only of the American people, but people in Africa. The fact that, for starters, Barack Obama’s father is from Kenya, people were very excited. And because they had had a failed election in Kenya, and the opposition leading Kenya, Raila Odinga, comes from the same tribe as Barack Obama’s father, the Luo, the joke was going around Kenya that America is going to have a Luo president before Kenya does.

        Now, there’s huge interest, not just in Kenya, all over the continent. Nobody for a moment, I think, believes that he is anything but a – would be anything but an American president if he is elected. The fact that a black man and one with African blood has managed to get this far, you know, I think it has made young people sit up and listen and watch and follow the campaign. It has made the older generations who lived through the colonialism and independence sit down and say, well, well, well, so it can happen in America, too. Huge interest.

        It is discussed at almost the end of the interview.

  8. 14 drkate October 20, 2009 at 10:49 am

    Obama the manchurian candidate, a great read:

  9. 16 susan h October 20, 2009 at 10:54 am

    No doubt, Obama is calling everyone and getting everything redacted, changed, expunged, stories changed, corrected, modified, and new versions spun even as we speak. Many palms were no doubt greased in Hawaii and he can do the same in Kenya. There is an abundance of our stimulus money to spend wherever and whatever it takes.

    Thanks Dr. Kate, for staying on this story.

    When George Bush was president, and he lied us into war, I wanted him impeached. I did not care what the consequences were. Even if we had to be stuck with Dick Cheney, it didn’t matter to me. Of course that never happened.

    If it can be proven that Obama is not eligible, well if the shoe fits…not sure if someone who was not eligible can be impeached, but he should immediately leave the White House, collect his $200 and Pass Go.

    • 17 JJ October 20, 2009 at 2:08 pm

      No doubt, Obama is calling everyone and getting everything redacted, changed, expunged, stories changed, corrected, modified, and new versions spun even as we speak.

      “The past is whatever the records and the memories agree upon.
      And since the party is in full control of all records, and in
      equally full control of the minds of it’s members, it follows
      that the past is whatever the party chooses to make it. Six
      means eighteen, two plus two equals five, war is peace,
      freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.”
      …. George Orwell

  10. 18 d2i October 20, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    drkate – well done. Once you feel the letter is ready for your readers to use, could you please post it scribd so we can download and our address information.

    You said this – “Mr. Obama’s adoption by an Indonesian citizen and his travel to Pakistan in 1981 when Americans were not permitted suggests multiple citizenship, which at least raises a question of his eligibility. This should have been investigated by you and the DNC, but was not.” How do you know it was not investigated, or maybe a better way of saying this is, how do you know they didn’t intentionally put up and ineligible candidate?

    My assumption has always been that they did know and purposely covered it up. The Cert’s Pelosi signed lack eligibility language w/one exception, Hawaii. A second Cert had to be signed that included eligibility language in it but was signed by the Dem Chair of HI’s State Party.

    As well, all of the shenanigans the 0 team pulled prior to the RBC meeting and then the convention. Pelosi constantly changed her language when referring to pledged delegates and how they should vote. Pelosi, for the first time in DNC Convention history, chose not to hold an open roll-call vote. To this day, we haven’t any idea how the delegates voted or even if their votes were tallied accordingly. And then lets not forget the May 31, 2008 RBC meeting. Taken in totality, without question she and all of the other leaders knew exactly what they were doing and how to get 0’s name on the general election ballot. jbjd always stresses this – her/their entire goal was to get his name on the general election ballot and the steps they took to get him there are painfully obvious IMHO.

    These leaders knew what they were doing and the ones leading today know as well. Therefore, I might suggest changing that latter part, that is if you concur, to something a bit stronger and transparent.

  11. 19 susan h October 20, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Another theory of Obama’s birth, etc., below. This person thinks Obama may have been adopted by Stanley Ann Dunham. While it may or may not be true, very interesting theory.

    • 20 Quantum Leap October 20, 2009 at 9:41 pm

      As an artist, I am certain that she is his mother. He has many of her features that cannot be duplicated otherwise. However, I am not certain of the Kenya born mime. I think it’s a made up distraction. I think Lolo is his dad and that makes his birthday and age a sham. Lolo’s features mixed with Stanley’s produce obama. An artist sees like no one else sees. If you look close you may see Lolo in obama. He has stanley’s chin though. But I don’t expect anyone to understand. It’s not a thought but a knowing a seeing. Of course I could be wrong.

  12. 21 Michelle October 20, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    Dear Dr. Kate-this is a link to the Kenyan parliament session Nov 2008 that Catherine referred to.

    • 22 d2i October 20, 2009 at 5:40 pm

      This information is fascinating. Did I read correctly that this individual who hosts the blog has a hard copy of the record?

  13. 23 Jed October 20, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    I would like to see Pelosi put on trial for what she has done, not just Obama.

    Even if the trial does not work out because of some technicality, it might distract her from the damage she is doing in her current role for a while.

    It is too bad her home district is too Democrat to hold her accountable next election. Harry Reid, on the other hand, will soon be gone.

  14. 24 Jed October 20, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    Politicians who have no fear of losing office quickly become a menace to America.

    Pelosi is our #1 example.

  15. 25 William Blaine October 20, 2009 at 2:37 pm

    I have some informtion for you. Where can I send it?

  16. 26 William Blaine October 20, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    Sorry, I gave you the wrong email address. Please use this one. I have a pdf to send you.

    • 27 gmiller October 20, 2009 at 6:07 pm

      Having the letter focus on some articles run in Mickey Mouse publications to “prove” Obama was born in Kenya proves very little, except that some people thought so then. How did THEY establish that?

      The main proof is that Barack Hussein Sr, if he’s the real father, was born in Kenya and was not a U.S. citizen. that might close the case by itself.

      The grandmother’s testimony of birth witnessing might carry some weight.

      One of the multiple Kenyan alleged birth certificates floating around may be validated.

      Then we have his mother’s age and U.S. residency years to look at, then the dual citizenship issue, possible citizenship renunciation, etc.

      But unless I’m mistaken, it would seem that the burden of proof should be on Obama to prove his eligibility, not for opponents to prove his ineligibility. It is quite clear that he has failed to do that.

      The fact that Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro, or whoever he is, has produced no meaningful proof of natural born citizenship, should be immediate cause for nullification of his election, which never should have taken place, but for the utter corruption and malfeasance of our Congress, electoral college, state and U.S. Justice Depts., political parties, courts and of course, the compliant ‘media.”

      It seems like Obama should produce a pile of requested documentation to corroborate his claims. It seems that that request will meed to be turned into an order to produce it, with severe consequences he fails to do that. Losing a case will likely make him a felon and maybe an illegal, jobless immigrant, as well.

      • 28 drkate October 20, 2009 at 6:14 pm

        I agree with everything you say. The public smells something but doesn’t seem to totally understand that the concept of NBC does not just include born in the usa.

        Being born out of the USA is something that many will see immediately, and if they are already questioning Obama, should begin to understand what is going on. Now with the added testimony of the Kenyan grandmother, the kenyan BC that Taitz has(whether authentic or not), and the foreign press articles, should at least send ripples through the pond.

        • 29 gmiller October 20, 2009 at 6:56 pm

          Dr. Kate:

          Yes, we have to guard against the possibility of proof of U.S.birth somehow coming up and people thinking that’s the end of the story. Although I can’t understand why he wouldn’t have already produced it. Something very embarrassing in the records?

          Could it be even more embarrassing than being bodily ejected from the White House? More likely, it doesn’t exist. This is probably the biggest U.S. political scandal in history, but even bigger is the power structure– both parties, for that matter and the media- trying to keep a lid on it, while the courts parry attempst to get at the truth. Faith in “our” institutions will never be be the same.

          Yes, we need to make people aware that natural born citizenship is a higher hurdle than just citizenship. We also need to better explain why it is so important.

          I hope that you and your readers will donate generously to Orly Taitz ( ) and the other attorneys working so hard for justice. Thanks for your efforts to educate the public.

          • 30 drkate October 20, 2009 at 6:59 pm

            Agreed. gmiller. I put up a post not long ago on ‘the tyranny of multiple allegiances’ that looks at the citizenship piece. Obama is the posterchild for why ARticle II, Section 1 exists! 😡

  17. 31 gmiller October 20, 2009 at 9:49 pm

    (mailed)19 October, 2009


    Judge David O. Carter
    U.S. District Court
    411 West 4th Street- #1-053
    Santa Ana, CA 92701

    Dear Judge Carter:

    I have watched the Barnett v Obama case progress, or lack thereof. I cannot conceive of why citizens would lack “standing” to sue Obama for harm suffered as a result of his fraudulent ascendancy to the “Presidency,” let alone national candidates for office, such As Alan Keyes, or military people whose very lives are on the line, due to decisions made up a chain of command ending in the White House. I have been personally harmed by some of the financial, social, and political moves made by the Obama administration since January 20 and by the impact of fraud on the electoral process before that.

    Judge Carter, please do your duty and have this case heard, discovery performed and the truth brought out. Anything less than that would be, at a minimum, dereliction of your sworn duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. While it isn’t your fault that the Congress, Electoral College, political parties, “news” media and other courts have all failed us, you have a historical opportunity to help right this. It is amazing that it has come down to a Soviet emigrant dentist/attorney and an obscure Conservative lawyer, representing 48 plaintiffs seeking redress. I hope that our descendents will read historical accounts describing how the Obama usurpation was stopped cold by a former U.S. Marine Federal Judge. My father was also a U.S. Marine, 4th Div, veteran of Iwo Jima, in WWII. If you are anywhere near the man he was, you will step up to the challenge.

    You must be under enormous pressure, to put it mildly. Please also consider that we have been getting almost daily proof of the wisdom of the eligibility provisions in Article II, Section I, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution and the urgency of doing something about it.

    I thought that I was reading a satirical article, when I saw the incredible revelations about the appointment of Siddharth Velamoor as clerk to your court, given his close connections as an associate with Perkins Coie, LLP’s office in Seattle, Washington, to Robert Bauer, of the Obama legal defense team, who just happens to be married to none other than the infamous Anita Dunn, known Marxist radical and Director of Communications for our own defendant, Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro. Truth really IS stranger than fiction. It is not clear if Mr. Velamoor has
    broken his relations with the firm. Maybe you can also help us clear up the mystery of someone who appeared to be Lindsay Lutz in the courtroom on October 5. Hopefully, all of that will be quickly rectified.

    May God be with you,


  1. 1 Twitter Trackbacks for Madame Speaker, I Want an Answer « drkatesview [] on Trackback on October 20, 2009 at 10:18 am
  2. 2 GROW A SPINE! « drkatesview Trackback on October 29, 2009 at 12:53 am
  3. 3 Nancy Pelosi is Obama’s “Al Capone” « drkatesview Trackback on December 3, 2009 at 12:10 am
Comments are currently closed.

October 2009

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: