Article II: The Tyranny of Multiple Allegiances

©2009 drkate  (originally published October 6, 2009)

[Author’s note 1.  I am reposting this article to reinforce the peril we face by not having a Natural Born Citizen in the White House, and why the Founders required this provision as the criterion for being eligible for the Presidency.  The obots think the dismissals mean this is over.  It is not.  Thank you.]

[Author’s note 2.  This article continues the discussion of Tyranny in America and focuses squarely on a threshold constitutional issue: the CIC’s required qualifications for the job.  Please note that the Andrea Shea King Show will be hosting “Birthers Week” , and I submit this post in support of that effort!]

Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.” –Letter from John Jay to George Washington, July 25, 1787

Anyone who has been seriously following the Natural Born Citizenship issue in this last year and a half is by now familiar with the influence of John Jay on the requirements of the President as stated in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.  Use of the term in 1787 implies some knowledge of its meaning, indeed, see the Law of Nations by Vattel.


There are many fine blogs which have researched and defined the term and significance of  ‘NBC’, and the consensus among all of them is that the concept of natural born citizenship is about allegiance. The Commander in Chief must have only one allegiance–to the United States–to prevent foreign influence on and within the highest office in the land.

Thus the President must be born on American soil to two U.S. citizens.  A dual or naturalized U.S. citizen cannot be a Natural Born Citizen under the U.S. Constitution.

The Founders imposed this criterion on the office of the Presidency to avoid  the following possible outcomes:

  • hesitancy on military matters effecting the national security
  • the lack of timely, strategic decision making,
  • the disarming or weakening of the defenses of America,
  • weakening of foreign policy, and
  • the presence of a ‘foreign agenda’ that is evident in daily actions of the Executive.

This is the kind and manifestation of the tyranny that would result from  multiple allegiances.


The Founders recognized that the threat of foreign influence in the Office of the President would exist forever.  They sought to safeguard the country through the ‘Natural Born Citizen’ clause of Article II, Section 1.


The purpose of this article is to discuss how the concept of “natural born citizen” was degraded, attacked, and ignored by Obama and the democrats and the consequences to the safeguards intended by Article II, Section 1.

The “Natural Born Citizen”

The definition of “natural born citizen”, and the reason why America should continue to be protected by that clause in Article II, are described and detailed  eloquently in several blog sites.   The Birthers website, in particular the article entitled Logic of a Natural Born Citizen presents an extremely cogent analysis of how one obtains citizenship, and what three conditions lead to being a natural born citizen:


To add the weight of scholarly research to the definition of ‘natural born citizen is The Natural Born Citizen Book, written by He’s Not My President, on the blogroll.  From the text of this fine book, and regarding allegiance:

The founding fathers were learned men.  They had read and were versed in many subjects and literate in the writings and teachings of the political thinkers that came before them.  One such political thinker whom the founding fathers were profoundly familiar was Cicero.  In reading Cicero’s works on natural law, the founders concluded that:

The Law of Nature or Nature’s God is eternal in its basic goodness; it is universal in its application.  It is a code of “right reason” from the Creator himself.  It cannot be altered.  It cannot be repealed.  It cannot be abandoned by legislators or the people themselves, even though they may pretend to do so.  In Natural Law we are dealing with factors of absolute reality.  It is basic in its principles, comprehensible to the human mind, and totally correct and morally right in its general operation.[iv]

They created the Supreme Law of Land when they wrote the Constitution based on this idea of natural law.  Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations is a treatise on natural law as indicated by the full title of his treatise:  The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law.[v] The Natural Born Citizen Book, 2009.

Other excellent legal analyses of NBC can be found at Mario Apuzzo’s website as well as that of Leo Donofrio.

The Attack on Article II

indonesia-flagSince the issue of eligibility first surfaced in the spring of 2008, Obama, the socialist democrats, and the media tried to diminish the concept of ‘natural born citizen’ as an issue of a birth certificate, in other words, ‘born in the USA’.  The effort was to marginalize, mock, and diminish the concept embodied in Article II, and those who would raise this issue were called racists by friends, family, and strangers alike.

I don’t know about you, but I believe I understood by the time I was in 3rd or 4th grade what a ‘natural born citizen’ meant.  I knew enough to know that I am an American citizen, but not a natural born one.  So when the denigration of the concept of NBC arose, I–like others–knew it was a sham.

Obama specifically acknowledged in  Dreams of My Father, that his father was a British citizen (later Kenyan), which is according to the Constitution,  a disqualifying factor for the Presidency and at the very least raises questions about his eligibility.

In June 2008 Obama specifically bowed to the questions being raised about his citizenship by posting, on his Annenberg Political Fact Check  “Fight the Smears” website, a “Certification of Live Birth”, which raises more questions than it answers.  The FTS website states that Obama was a British citizen at birth due to his father’s citizenship.  The website then, and to this day, continues to establish Mr. Obama as a ‘native born’ citizen, not a ‘natural born’ citizen.


The blatant tyranny of this attack is as follows:

  • Use all media and political forces to bury the subject or ridicule, mock, isolate, destroy, or marginalize anyone who raises it.
  • Use of media resources to misinform the public–pass off ‘native citizen’ and ‘American citizen’ as ‘natural born citizen’
  • Using sheer political force to violate regulations within the DNC and the U.S. Constitution by deliberately placing an ineligible, possible foreign national, in the White House
  • Using campaign contributions, and then taxpayer dollars, to prevent the disclosure of essential records relating to Obama’ citizenship
  • Usurpation of the power of government, and use of government officials, to block access to records and to eliminate other records (i.e., Indonesia, passport files)

The Patriots’ Actions

The best thing the Patriots have done is to hold the ground and begin to advance.  The ground has been held through lawsuits, through the 912 march where hundreds of signs spoke of natural born citizenship, to the questions still being asked, to the relentless authors of blogs who keep at the truth, and to the daily advancements we make in our understanding.  The questions are not going away.

In the search for justice on this matter there has been great recent progress in finding an indirect way to get at the eligibility issue…just like Al Capone was finally nailed on income tax charges.

We are helped remarkably by Obama’s own slip-ups, often brought on by his arrogance and hubris.  In a fit of bragging about foreign experience, Obama let it slip that he had been to Pakistan in 1981.  Oops.

Of course, we researched this. Now, the one question that could unravel the whole mystery and catch him  off guard or completely in a lie is,

“what passport did you use in 1981 when  you went to Pakistan?

If he says a “U.S. passport” we know he is lying…Americans were not permitted in Pakistan then.  If he says ‘British’ or ‘Indonesian’, then, well, sorry buddy, the jig is up.  Somewhere along the line he lost his American citizenship, if he ever had it.

In the end, it matters not who finally breaks this wide open.  It DOES matter that we continue to press this threshold issue of Article II eligibility.

Article II.  Appointment Authority

Although the issue of eligibility seems the most critical to me,  it is worth mentioning again that Obama has, once in office, exceeded his Article II appointment authority.  Already 34 ‘czars’ have been assembled and research on these individuals reveal and confirm Obama’s radical, left, communist agenda.

This usurpation of power and authority is rooted in the fundamental disregard for the Constitution, and is being used to advance a foreign agenda. The agenda includes the economy, military, the populace, our foreign policy, and our national defense.


‘All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent’.–Jefferson


53 Responses to “Article II: The Tyranny of Multiple Allegiances”

  1. 1 itooktheredpill October 6, 2009 at 3:31 am

    Excellent post, Dr. Kate.

    Anyone who has been seriously following the Natural Born Citizenship issue in this last year and a half is by now familiar with the influence of John Jay on the requirements of the President as stated in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

    For those who want to learn more about John Jay, I received permission from the publisher to reproduce text about him from pages 182-187 (out of over 1,000 pages) of the book Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States. See my post from April of last year, First Chief Justice John Jay.

  2. 3 kj October 6, 2009 at 7:43 am

    If Miss Tickly is right

    Mr. Obama would have never had a “clear title” birth certificate.

    1) Can the State Department issue a US passport to an individual that does not have a State Registrar Approved BC?

    2) Would a person without a State Registrar approved BC be considered a citizen or even a national of the US? A national would be able to obtain a US passport. Is there any difference between a citizen’s and a national’s passport?

    There have been rumors that Mr. Obama didn’t have a US passport until he entered the Senate. These rumors may be true. He had to have a passport for his international travel which would mean he acknowledged multiple allegiances after the age of majority, a situation which I find even more unsettling than multiple allegiances at birth.

    • 4 drkate October 6, 2009 at 10:27 am

      I read Ms Tickly’s report, which is very disturbing. I think it is entirely possible Obama married Michelle for a green card. Then, he didn’t have to show anything when he ran for senate, but once there, he got a diplomatic passport.

      Remember he was stopped in Russia with Lugar, detained at the airport for several hours. It probably had something to do with the diplomatic passport and no background whatsoever.

      Remember also the passport office break in, and the dead cooperating witness shortly thereafter.

      It is precisely the work of Ms Tickly, TD, Leo, Mario, jbjd, and so many others that prevents this issue from going away. One way or another, we will remove Obama.

  3. 7 susan h October 6, 2009 at 7:56 am

    If that is true, those who covered up for The Chosen One are totally invested in keeping that cover up and will continue to do so at all costs. The old question: What did they know, and when did they know it, applies? What did Howard Dean, Donna Brazile, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, know about all of this and when did they know it? If Obama had foreign passports, he must have filled out applications (college, law school) either saying he was not born in the U.S., or else he lied and said he was. What about petitions to run for office? I am sure one of the very first questions on that petition for congress, senate, president is: Are you a U.S. citizen? Were you born in the United States? If not, where were you born? Obama’s sealing up all his records and getting away with it is one of the ways the fraud was perpetrated on the American people. Since the newspapers and journalists failed to do their jobs and push for a release of all the sealed records (they certainly managed to get to Alaska in two minutes to investigate Sarah Palin when they wanted), every major news outlet is complicit in Obama’s deception.

    • 8 drkate October 6, 2009 at 10:30 am

      I agree. At first I could hardly believe it. Now I know. The entire first layer of government is complicit–the cabinet, Pelosi, Reid, Dean…all of them. When this is the case, what does succession look like? Looks to me like they find a way to get to Robert Gates as acting president.

  4. 11 susan h October 6, 2009 at 8:12 am

    Dr. Kate: This article is fantastic. In my opinion, it is the most important issue we have to discuss.

    However, I would like to change the subject slightly and report what I heard on Fox News last night. I hope that is okay. Dick Morris (cannot stand him since he bashes the Clintons) was on and said that Obama’s aim is to break our Constitution. He plans on a “One World Government” where the U.S. is no longer a sovereign nation, but we are part of a European congolmerate. We will be under the rule/law/sanctions economically speaking of a European socialism, if you were, and have to answer to others in terms of how we do things and spend our money, etc.
    Just listening to this sent chills down my spine (and not in a good way).

    • 12 drkate October 6, 2009 at 10:33 am

      Yes this is scary, and I do believe it is the plan. To destroy our national sovereignty (pls see archived articles on the right, “National sovereignty and the Obama administration”…

      That is why we get up every day and struggle to expose him and derail his plans.

      I do think that Obama has underestimated Americans…and he made the mistake of awakening the sleeping giant. He will not prevail as long as there are those of us who are awake.

      • 13 Quantum Leap October 6, 2009 at 2:12 pm

        Absolutely. I read an article in Feb 2008 where obama was saying that his plans were to make this nation a nation of black panthers..but he won’t do it right away. He’d follow normal protocol until his second term (sic) and then take america down..point was that making blacks the majority rule or something…wish I’d saved it but so much info was pouring out minute by minute at the time. Once he took office I guess he saw he couldn’t wait. I do remember that even during the primary he obviously thought Americans are dumb and not paying attention…I wrote to Hillary and told her we were not paying attention and were too busy with our lives but now we are paying attention and we have much work to do.

  5. 14 susan h October 6, 2009 at 9:33 am

    Dr. Kate and All: Forgive me for posting so many items today. The link below is VERY interesting in light of what we are discussing. It is an editorial from John Charlton and is right on topic today. I am not sure who this organization is that he writes for, The Post & Email, a new web-site of what they call American Patriots, who are trying to “run the blockade on the Main Stream Media blackout, which began in the last election cycle” and report news accurately which the MSM refuses or fails to do.

    • 15 drkate October 6, 2009 at 10:40 am

      Thank you Susan h for this article. It is inspiring and I surely hope this is what is in HRC’s mind. “Use it or lose it”, indeed. This is a great read!

  6. 16 Curi0us0nefromthe60s October 6, 2009 at 9:38 am

    Dr. Kate,

    Terrific article, and thank you for including a portion of my book in the article.

    Another item that I think is of great significance, I first found in one of jbjd’s articles where she had an image posted in her blog of an older Fight The Smears post regarding Obama being a 14th Amendment citizen. As we all know the Fight the Smears site Birth Certificate debunk no longer talks about Obama being a 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, but I think this is a very signficant point because we know 14th Amendment U.S. citizens are not natural born citizens.

    I have a new website that I put together (not a blog, but a full website) called I’ve dedicated this site to the dual citizenship issue. Right now I have the site focused on Leo Donofrio’s work.

    I went to the Wayback machine of archived web material and found the Fight the Smears page that jbjd referenced in her post. I have uploaded a PDF of this page to my new site You can find the Fight the Smears page with the 14th Amendment language here:

    It seems incredible to me that originally they were arguing that he was a 14th Amendment citizen and then they erase that reference for the current reference of a native born citizen.

    • 17 drkate October 6, 2009 at 10:42 am

      Thank you for capturing that. I remember being stunned when I read on his website that Obama ‘is a native born American citizen under the 14th amendment. Hello? And those of us who screamed were ignored.

      Having that screen shot is critical!

      Are we closing in on him? I think so.

  7. 18 smrstrauss October 6, 2009 at 12:14 pm

    This is what the Wall Street Journal comments: “Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning.”

    In other words, Natural Born simply means born in the country. If the writers of the Constitution had wanted to bar the children of foreigners from being eligible, they would have said it. If they had wanted to bar persons with dual nationality or who had ever had dual nationality from being president, they would have said it. But they didn’t say anything like that.

    They barred foreigners and naturalized citizens from being president, but they did not bar the children of foreigners. Why not? Probably because they believed that the children of foreigners born in American would be as loyal as the children of US citizens. After all, Madison wrote that the place of birth is the criterion of allegiance under our law:

    In a speech before the House of Representatives in May of 1789, James Madison said:

    “It is an established maxim, that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth, however, derives its force sometimes from place, and sometimes from parentage; but, in general, place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States.”

    Most importantly, the term Natural Born was MOST commonly used in the citizenship laws of the colonies and states, and it also was in British common law, and it simply meant “born in the country” (except for the children of foreign diplomats).

    • 19 drkate October 6, 2009 at 12:36 pm

      Oh the Wall STreet Journal is trying mightily to dispose of this issue, even calling the term ‘eccentric’. Obviously the author of this article hasn’t done much research. Otherwise this issue would have been disposed of pretty quickly.

      Too bad obama has to be assisted by a lying, unresponsive, irresponsible press.

      Doesn’t matter what they think, this issue is in the courts now, and, most importantly, millions of Americans are aware of it.

      By the time 2010 rolls around, each state is going to have a requirement that candidates prove themselves. By that time, Pelosi will have been removed, hopefully in jail, for her role in defrauding Americans in 2008.

  8. 20 Curi0us0nefromthe60s October 6, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    Smrstrauss likes to quote Taranto of the Wall Street Journal. Taranto is a known propagandist who inserts words into laws that are not there. Smrstrauss, you would think that you could by now have found a legitimate source to quote, but you continue to promote the propagandist Taranto.

  9. 21 Quantum Leap October 6, 2009 at 2:36 pm

    I don’t know about you, but I believe I understood by the time I was in 3rd or 4th grade what a ‘natural born citizen’ meant. I knew enough to know that I am an American citizen, but not a natural born one. So when the denigration of the concept of NBC arose, I–like others–knew it was a sham

    Indeed. We’d all be outside ‘playng’ and talking about what is a citizen when we were just kids. Many of us had foreign born grand parents so it was an issue and something you learned early on.

  10. 22 Miri October 6, 2009 at 2:40 pm

    Remember how Obama lived in Bali for 6 months, with MO, while supposedly writing his ghost-written, fictional “auto”biography? I wonder how he was allowed to stay there for so long. Where did he live? With whom? Under what passport did he travel?

    • 23 drkate October 6, 2009 at 2:51 pm

      Exactly, Miri. I think his mother had a house in Java? And yes, what passport? If it was after his mother died, he probably has property there or it still is in the dunham or soetoro name.

      Also, he has those high level connections in the government through his stepfather…

  11. 24 Walt1 October 6, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Brilliant! Is it possibel to get the Supreme Court to pass down a ruling on the definition of “Natural Born” without mentioning BHO. This should be a cut and dry issue and any American Citizen should be able to do a Citezens Arrest of BHO.

    If a citizen placed BHO under citizens arrest would it not have to go to trial?

  12. 25 Katie October 6, 2009 at 4:17 pm

    Please take the time to read this very important information.

    Below is an overview of the Continental Congress (CC) with links to do your own research.

    The first Continental Congress was called in the early 1770’s which ultimately resulted in the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and the birth of this great nation. This CC is being called to RESTORE the Constitution and the Republic. (It’s a common misunderstanding to think it’s a Constitutional Convention, which could be used to amend the Constitution. It is the complete opposite – it is to DEFEND the Constitution) The decision to convene CC2009 comes after fourteen years of filing Petitions for Redress with the federal government for repeated violations of the Constitution by We The People Foundation for Constitutional Education, a national 501 c3 non-profit with headquarters in New York. It is not rooted in any political party – all parties have been equally ignoring The People.

    This is YOUR opportunity to vote – with a paper ballot that you KNOW will be counted – for your state’s delegates to represent YOU. Please spread the word about this election – the mainstream media isn’t doing it, that’s for sure. If you are not able to vote on Saturday, please look at their website and donate if you choose. This event will be broadcast live for all the world to see, and it takes a lot to pull it together. Just as those courageous Founding Fathers did over 200 years ago, Citizens of the United States are making this happen.


    Citizens Rising in Defense of the Constitution

    States prepare for coming Continental Congress

    National Election Day October 10th

    Colorado, October 5, 2009 – Citizens fed up with constitutional violations causing devastation to the economy and the Nation, are stepping up to join constitutional activist across this great country to prepare for a modern-day Continental Congress to take place November 9-22, 2009 in St. Charles, Illinois. Continental Congress 2009 is not political or partisan and seeks to defend, not amend, the current Constitution.

    Many have asked, “What is the next appropriate step for the free people of America?” The constitutional answer is to hold this historic national assembly to inspire the critical mass necessary to restore constitutional governance. 153 citizen-nominated-and-elected Delegates – three from each state and Washington, D.C. — will convene for two weeks to methodically and factually document constitutional abuses which have taken place over many years, across many administrations, every branch of government and both parties. Delegates will consider specific non-violent, legal civic actions to stop the wrong doings.

    All nominees have a “proven passion for the Constitution.” You can view the delegates’ profiles by visiting and clicking on your state. Delegates will make their own way to Illinois, but room and board will be covered by donations contributed by We The People Foundation members.

    Election Centers have been secured and Election Day will be held October 10, 2009. The election will be constitutionally valid using visible and transparent vote counting; an effort planner’s hope will eliminate the constitutionally invalid general electoral procedures currently in use. Where polling places are not available, a mail-in ballot process is being offered.

    The decision to convene CC2009 comes after fourteen years of filing Petitions for Redress with the federal government for repeated violations of the Constitution by We The People Foundation for Constitutional Education, a national 501 c3 non-profit with headquarters in New York. The Right to petition was put in the First Amendment by the Founding Fathers, who did not want Americans to ever again experience a situation where their individual rights or civil liberties were threatened. To date, this Right has never been recognized by the government nor defined in any court of law. Robert L. Schulz, Chairman of We The People Foundation says it must now be used to hold elected officials accountable to the rest of the Constitution “which will shift the power from the government back to The People where it belongs.”

    “Americans are waking up to the urgent need to stand strong for the Founding Principles and our Constitution, as every violation further devastates our economy and our way of life,” says Schulz. “We all desire the same outcome: restoration of our Nation. Continental Congress 2009 is the only strategy we see that is not political or partisan, does not rely on the electoral process, and can bring peaceful and legal solutions to our current situation.” We The People expect this effort to be the catalyst that brings the freedom-loving people of America together at this critical time.

    Readers can learn more about We The People Congress and the Continental Congress 2009 by going to or calling 877-225-6059 ext 9.

  13. 26 Search the Web on October 6, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    I just got word that MSM is givin Obam heck!!
    Anyone hear about it?

  14. 27 kay October 6, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    I have no idea why my name was changed to 23 Search the Web on

    • 28 drkate October 6, 2009 at 6:25 pm

      ??? me neither. let me do some looking around at ips.

      And yes, there may be a turning point happening, especially with SNL spoofing his lack of accomplishments: “jack” “squat”

    • 29 drkate October 6, 2009 at 6:27 pm

      Kay—the two have the same ip address and email. so no idea, must be a wordpress burp.

  15. 30 kay October 6, 2009 at 7:27 pm

    Thanks drkate….I thought is was wierd!
    maybe new c zar

  16. 31 Rick A Hyatt October 6, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    As a life-long espionage operative, the illegetamate son of former MFS Stasi General Markus Wolf, having been turned by the CIA early in my life to lure him to the West, I feel very qualified to make the following statement:
    In the Duesseldorf Consulate in 1977 the Director of CIA Ops, GHWB wanted me to remember the following. Markus Wolf and their Communist agenda to take over the US at the top had already been “Turned.”
    “So how do you lure out all the moles from the woodwork, then?” He wanted me to remember.
    He laughed, and said, “Just hoist a Barry Soretono up the flagpole and see who salutes.”
    And the Bushes have been preempting every Coup D’Edat terrorist mechanism since, taking all the wind out of what should have been a 2009 9/11… Think on it…
    The Stimulus… Health Care to invite mass terrorism & invasion… The use of homosexual blackmail to muzzle the Conservatives… Heck, The Great 0 has been the best salesman for gun rights the NRA could ever have wished for.
    A CIA PLANT!!!! Nah….
    Think on it.

  17. 32 Quantum Leap October 6, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    A new Czar just like the old Czars?

    He is a pervert who shouldn’t be around children and he is in charge of the whole shooting match.
    obama associates with questionable people. Preying on children is a crime. Or so I thought.
    man boy love…multiple partners love..
    No I’m no homophobe in the least. Men are weird..sorry guys.

  18. 33 Rosemary Woodhouse October 6, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    drkate posted, “I agree. At first I could hardly believe it. Now I know. The entire first layer of government is complicit–the cabinet, Pelosi, Reid, Dean…all of them. When this is the case, what does succession look like?…”

    Yes, ergo the choice of my screen name oh so many months ago at TDs blog. I knew, as the character, Rosemary, posited in the film, all of them were “in on it; all of them”. There was no other way this could have been pulled off so flawlessly.

    An interesting subplot was – were all of the events Rosemary was experiencing borne of truth or paranoia? The conclusion of the film spoke to the fact that she was not delusional. Neither are we.

    In light of the Roman Polanski situation(director, Rosemary’s Baby, 1968) I offer a diversionary read.

  19. 34 RICHARD October 6, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    at the top of this article is a picture of the UNION JACK–sorry but its upside down–the broad white stripe should be at the top.
    i know we lost -but–
    the issue with jennings makes sence if you accept the fact that barry is Gay– it was only a matter of time before he needed a close mail friend in the white house, also note his sudden interest in the Gay community by holding meetings with them this week.
    I have always thought his marriage was a sham and came about far to quickly whilst he was clarking at an ACORN defending law firm. also at the same firm was Bernardine Dohrn wife of William Ayers,
    it was she who ‘introduced’ the loving couple and had them married in just a few weeks.
    then we learned that three young Gay men disapeared from Trinity Church, one is known to have been murdered; hm’ still under investigation (not)
    This article is excellent because it keeps the presure up as well as our spirits which is important as we collectivly pursue our ultimate goal of removing this fake from office.

    • 35 drkate October 6, 2009 at 11:41 pm

      Thank you for the tip on the flag, I will replace it. Thanks for your comments, and yes, an intent of mine is to keep the pressure up, sort of to ‘lob’ a cannonball over the fence every day! 😛

  20. 36 Delle October 7, 2009 at 8:20 am

    I wouldn’t really care that obama is gay, except that it means he has been deceiving all of us.

    He promotes himself as a family man with a glamorous wife – the woman with the beautiful arms – and two cute daughters.

    Here is another article questioning his past:

    It includes a photo of obama, which I didn’t first recognize as being him.

    Nothing about this man is real.

    We are in a heap of trouble.

    Thanks to Dr. Kate and others like her, we may finally see our way out of this mess.

  21. 37 Miri October 7, 2009 at 2:26 pm

    This is way out of left field, but does anybody know if Russ Feingold has ever weighed in on the eligibility issue? He held a hearing on czars recently. He invited the WH to send someone to testify, but they declined. (No surprise there.) He might hold another hearing. It concerned the WH overstepping its bounds by creating an unconfirmed “shadow government” (my words) to usurp the powers of the Cabinet, like how two or more men usurp Hillary’s role as SoS. The reporter said that Feingold is VERY concerned with the Constitution. If so, then he ought to be similarly concerned about Constitutional eligibility. I think this was on Greta Van Susteran’s show. She was interviewing a Republican about the czars. He basically said that their hands are tied because Congress is in the hands of the Dems. What do you all think about Feingold? Any hope there?

  22. 38 Miri October 7, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    Don’t be discouraged by the lying last-legs media. They reported today that Obama’s going up in the polls. Approval now at 56%. Not.

    Rasmussen has him at 49 approve/50 DISapprove; Gallup 51/42. Only AP and CBS/NYT have him at 56% approval. Rasmussen uses the best scientific methods. We can guess what methods the last-legs media use (whatever gives the results they want in service to Dear Leader):

  23. 41 Quantum Leap November 4, 2009 at 11:45 am

    Thus the President must be born on American soil to two U.S. citizens. A dual or naturalized U.S. citizen cannot be a Natural Born Citizen under the U.S. Constitution.

    The Founders imposed this criterion on the office of the Presidency to avoid the following possible outcomes:

    •hesitancy on military matters effecting the national security
    •the lack of timely, strategic decision making,
    •the disarming or weakening of the defenses of America,
    •weakening of foreign policy, and
    •the presence of a ‘foreign agenda’ that is evident in daily actions of the Executive.
    This is the kind and manifestation of the tyranny that would result from multiple allegiances.

    We are witnessing this already by the uspurper. His a*s is showing.

  24. 42 kay November 4, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    Dr. Kate and ALL Readers..
    Does anyone know how to get in touch with Sara Palin?
    Leo at
    read comments…
    interested person” under 3503 Sara would qualify!!!
    Oct. 30, 2009 9:31 A.M.
    Oct. 31 2:36 pm

  25. 43 kay November 4, 2009 at 5:44 pm

    Got this from Leo’s blog..

    Hi Leo!

    You are doing the Country a great service. I read all the above comments and noticed that no one asked how exactly does one become, or be defined as, an interested party, in order to file a Quo Warranto case, so I have reproduced the information here:

    § 16-3501. Persons against whom issued; civil action.
    § 16-3502. Parties who may institute; ex rel. proceedings.
    § 16-3503. Refusal of Attorney General or United States attorney to act; procedure.
    § 16-3501. Persons against whom issued; civil action.

    A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.

    (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 602, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 562, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 145(n); 1973 Ed., § 16-3501; 1981 Ed., § 16-3501.)

    § 16-3502. Parties who may institute; ex rel. proceedings.

    The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person. The writ may not be issued on the relation of a third person except by leave of the court, to be applied for by the relator, by a petition duly verified setting forth the grounds of the application, or until the relator files a bond with sufficient surety, to be approved by the clerk of the court, in such penalty as the court prescribes, conditioned on the payment by him of all costs incurred in the prosecution of the writ if costs are not recovered from and paid by the defendant.

    (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 602, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 562, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 145(n); 1973 Ed., § 16-3502; 1981 Ed., § 16-3502.)

    § 16-3503. Refusal of Attorney General or United States attorney to act; procedure.

    If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs.

    (Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 602, Pub. L. 88-241, § 1; July 29, 1970, 84 Stat. 562, Pub. L. 91-358, title I, § 145(n); 1973 Ed., § 16-3503; 1981 Ed., § 16-3503.)

  26. 44 ILBlue November 4, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    Hi Dr.Kate,

    I posted this story for you on twitter…!!!

    Wow, very interesting indeed,hmmm hmmm hmm. 🙂

  27. 45 Ladysforest November 7, 2009 at 10:25 am

    Hello Dr. Kate and everyone.

    Yesterday MissT’s blog was “deleted by Author” and the folks on my forum were wondering if anyone has heard what or why this happened?

    Dr.Kate, I also wanted to thank you for this reposting and to let you know that I “borrowed” it to post under the “About” page on my forum:

    I’d like to extend an invitation to you and the folks who post on your blog to visit the forum and join. It is not intended to act as a blog, but instead it is an internet “rally” location to bring together as many groups, organizations and individuals under one umbrella as we can to have some numbers ready for Leo when he needs us. It is dedicated also to providing research and reference materials to those who are interested.

  1. 1 Choose Liberty! « drkatesview Trackback on October 7, 2009 at 12:02 am
  2. 2 Tyranny in America: The Judiciary « drkatesview Trackback on October 14, 2009 at 12:56 pm
  3. 3 Article II: The Tyranny of Multiple Allegiances « drkatesview | Obama Snafu Trackback on November 5, 2009 at 6:54 am
  4. 4 Relentless « drkatesview Trackback on December 15, 2009 at 12:02 am
  5. 5 The Usurper and the Courts « drkatesview Trackback on February 23, 2010 at 12:05 am
  6. 6 Dual Citizenship and the Presidency « drkatesview Trackback on September 26, 2010 at 11:00 pm
  7. 7 A Congressional Test for the Usurper « drkatesview Trackback on March 17, 2011 at 10:33 pm
  8. 8 Memo to American Thinker: Four Facts on the Breach of Article II « drkatesview Trackback on April 3, 2011 at 10:09 pm
Comments are currently closed.

November 2009
« Oct   Dec »

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: