The Accountability Clause

©2009 drkate

The Third Continental Congress’ findings regarding the last ten words, or the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment,  from the Articles of Freedom:

Wherefore, We the People now find the three branches of government to be in violation of the Accountability Clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution; the public officials to be guilty of dereliction of duty in violation of their Oath of Office; and their actions, as listed in the aforementioned Petitions for Redress, to be outside the boundaries drawn around their power and, therefore, unconstitutional.

It is a known fact that the ratification of the Constitution by several states hinged upon the secure passage of a “Bill of Rights”  to protect the states from the newly created federal government.  The states feared the power of a central government–after all, they had just emerged from a war with one. Thus the first ten amendments to the Constitution for the United States can be considered the States’ mechanism for enforcement of the Constitution.

Before the Revolutionary War, the Colonists had formally petitioned King George –as was their right–for more than fifteen years.  The petitions sought redress of grievances of the Crown.  In most instances these petitions were met with silence, but then the imposition of onerous laws, taxes, and outright hostility and imprisonment ensued.

For more than fifteen years, the We the People Foundation along with many others have also been petitioning for redress of  numerous grievances, to wit:

1. Meddling in the internal affairs of other countries without any constitutional authority;
2. Undeclared wars in violation of the War Powers Clauses of Articles I and II;
3. The gifting and lending of public money and credit to private corporations for decidedly private purposes – bailouts – without any constitutional authority whatsoever;
4. A debt-based, fiat currency controlled by the Federal Reserve System, a cartel of private banks, all in violation of the Money Clauses of Article I;
5. Direct, un-apportioned taxes on labor in violation of the Tax Clauses of Article I;
6. Invasion of privacy and a developing police state in violation of the Privacy Clauses of the 4th Amendment;
7. Un-enforced immigration laws in violation of that mandate, plainly worded in Article II of the Constitution, that requires the president to faithfully execute the laws;
8. A President who refuses every request to provide evidence that he is a Natural Born Citizen, as Article II requires.
9. The counting of votes in secret, as all machines do, in violation of the constitutional Right not only to vote, but to know that all votes are being accurately counted;
10. The absence of well-regulated State Militias, and the presence of federal gun control laws that violate the 2nd Amendment; and
11. The government’s attempt to merge the governments of the United States, Mexico, and Canada into a “North American Union.”

These Petitions for Redress of Constitutional violations have been answered only with repeated injury.

The Third Continental Congress also found that the judiciary is violating the First Amendment rights of the citizenry by dismissing properly constructed petitions for ‘lack of standing’.  To dismiss for lack of standing because a plaintiff cannot prove his injury is not suffered by everyone is directly counter to the intent of the First Amendment.

Remedial Instruction # 1 to Congress:

Because the federal judiciary dismisses for “lack of standing” or “lack of jurisdiction” those Petitions by citizens who seek to remedy violations of the Constitution by public officials, the Congress of the United States shall adopt legislation to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure:

1. affirming the jurisdiction of all federal courts to hear challenges to the Constitutionality of any action by any state or federal public official, elected or appointed, or agency or department; and
2. to prohibit any and all federal courts from denying standing to any individual to challenge the Constitutionality of any action by any state or federal public officials, elected or appointed; and
3. to assure that any state or federal judge who violates the Rule related to paragraph “1” or “2” above shall be deemed to have violated his or her Oath of Office and shall be removed from office in accordance with existing Rules and disqualified from holding public office thereafter, and
4. defining the meaning of the word “proper,” within the context of the first paragraph above, as follows:
The term “Petition” is not defined in the Constitution. To be sure, a communication, to be protected as a Petition to the Government for Redress of Grievances would have to embody certain components to ensure that the document was a Petition and not a “pretended petition.” Not all communications, nor just any document, can be regarded as a Constitutionally protected Petition for Redress of Grievances. Petitions for Redress that qualify for protection by the First Amendment include Petitions to remedy violations of the Constitution which:

  • are serious and documented, not frivolous;
  • contain no falsehoods;
  • are not absent probable cause;
  • have the quality of a dispute;
  • come from a person outside of the formal political culture;
  • contain both a “direction” and a “demand” for relief;
  • have been punctilious (meaning, it follows formatting conventions);
  • address public, collective grievances;
  • involve Constitutional Principles;
  • have been signed only or primarily by citizens;
  • have been dignified (meaning authenticated);
  • have widespread participation and consequences;
  • are instruments of deliberation not agitation;
  • prove new information;

Given the revelations in the post on Lying, what we are dealing with are basically ruthless people who don’t care about following the law.  We will need an entirely new Congress to accomplish the proper redress of any grievances.  This means both 2010 and 2012 are critically important to stopping the ‘momentum’ of this threat we face in the ‘democrats’ and “Obama”.

The Articles of Freedom offer documentation in hand–the entire government is out of compliance.  As the preamble states, we DEMAND the government immediately restore constitutional governance, lest the people be forced to do so themselves.

Congress voting Independence

12 Responses to “The Accountability Clause”

  1. 1 Quantum Leap December 28, 2009 at 2:37 am

    It’s great to see the articles of freedom.

    Our next President Sarah Palin and her in AK.

    • 2 Katie December 28, 2009 at 12:16 pm

      I just spent the weekend reading “Going Rogue”, a Christmas gift from my parents.

      I HIGHLY recommend this book – it’s a refreshing story of a proud American woman with strong family values who has already walked the walk and talked the talk of what needs to happen in America.

      I never knew how corrupt Alaska’s state government was, and what one woman can do to lead the charge to reverse it.

      She is EXACTLY what America needs if it is to survive, and thrive.

  2. 3 Quantum Leap December 28, 2009 at 2:43 am

    Also thought you all may enjoy this site.
    They are working hard on a petiton to save our sovereignty.

    Here is a bill they are seeking to pass. Please sign the petition.
    H.R. 1146: American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009

    The United States of America has been a member-state of the United Nations since its inception as a supranational entity in 1945.

    Since the 1990s, amidst the high unpopularity of the UN within the United States, there has been a growing movement for United States withdrawal from the United Nations.

    Notable proponents of withdrawal claim that the United Nations subverts American sovereignty. Others including claim that many programs by the supranational entity have violated the Constitution.

    What many may not know is that there has been an ongoing legislative attempt in the House of Representatives by Rep Ron Paul to have the US withdrawal from the UN there is a bill in Congress right now towards that end.

    H.R. 1146: American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009

    There is only one way to achieve the US withdrawal from the UN and that is through Congressional Legislation. Here is your chance to help support the movement to have the US Withdrawal from the UN by showing your support for H.R.1146

    H.R.1146 is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. Most bills never make it pass this step but if you take action now we can let Congress know the Time Has Come for the US to Withdrawal from the UN!

    Let your voice be heard… visit and petition your representative directly in support of H.R. 1146.

  3. 4 ann December 28, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    Obama has posted the official birth certificate of Hawaii, which is the only one that Hawaii sends out. It no longer sends copies of the original document.

    The Wall Street Journal commented: “Obama has already provided a legal birth certificate demonstrating that he was born in Hawaii. No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary. Absent such evidence, it is unreasonable to deny that Obama has met the burden of proof. We know that he was born in Honolulu as surely as we know that Bill Clinton was born in Hope, Ark., or George W. Bush in New Haven, Conn.

    The release of the obsolete birth certificate would not “resolve the issue” to those for whom it is not already resolved. They claim without basis that today’s birth certificate is a fake; there is nothing to stop them from claiming without basis that yesterday’s is as well.”

    • 5 Katie December 28, 2009 at 2:35 pm

      Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints — none! There is no Obama documentation — no records — no paper trail — none.

      Original, vault copy birth certificate — Not released
      Certificate of Live Birth — Released — Counterfeit
      Obama/Dunham marriage license — Not released
      Soetoro/Dunham marriage license — Not released
      Soetoro adoption records — Not released
      Fransiskus Assisi School School application — Released
      Punahou School records — Not released
      Selective Service Registration — Released — Counterfeit
      Occidental College records — Not released
      Passport (Pakistan) — Not released
      Columbia College records — Not released
      Columbia thesis — Not released
      Harvard College records — Not released
      Harvard Law Review articles — None (maybe 1, unsigned?)
      Baptism certificate — None
      Medical records — Not released
      Illinois State Senate records — None
      Illinois State Senate schedule — Lost
      Law practice client list — Not released
      University of Chicago scholarly articles — None

      On the other hand, we can look at the bright side. There will be no need to raise money for his library. Since all we have is a digital forgery of a copy of a copy of something somewhere, then his “library” need be nothing more than a cubicle with a laptop.

      And as a bonus, it’ll be virtual so think of the carbon footprint reduction.

      Give me a break.

    • 6 Katie December 28, 2009 at 2:38 pm

      Try educating yourself before you try to indoctrinate others. Facts can be a freeing thing.

      “We have seen that Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because when he was born, regardless of what place that may be, he was not born to a United States citizen father and mother. The “natural born Citizen” clause of our U.S. Constitution requires that both of the child’s parents be U.S. Citizens at the time of birth. Rather, if Obama was born in Hawaii as he claims, then under the liberalized and questionable meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” he can be a born Fourteenth Amendment “citizen of the United States” and a “citizen of the United States at birth” under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401 (a). Again, that citizenship status does not make him an Article II “natural born Citizen.” But what would Obama’s citizenship status be if he was not born in the United States? First, let us examine why there is still existing doubts as to whether Obama was born in Hawaii. Second, let us examine what law would apply to determine Obama’s citizenship status should he not be born in Hawaii or any other part of the United States and what his citizenship status would be under that law.

      These are the reasons for the existing doubts regarding Obama’s place of birth:”

      • 7 tminu December 28, 2009 at 5:42 pm

        It has always been the bots who’ve overly focused on the BC, as if that would resolve his eligibility.


        But if he suddenly divulges another parent, he is just guilty of overt document fraud.

    • 8 drkate December 28, 2009 at 10:09 pm

      Wrong Ann. thanks for stopping by. The continued obfuscation by the obots shows how terrified they are about this issue.

      We don’t need the Birth Certificate, we already know he is ineligible as a result of his father’s citizenship

      I have to admit your comment is laughable and lame.

  4. 9 Quantum Leap December 28, 2009 at 9:00 pm

    He’s only in it for the perks by his own admission. We are free falling and have no leader. The “obama administration” is s big fat joke just like oprah is. “obama gonna do this obama gonna do that, obama said this and obama said that” the news says. Obama is swimming and golfing and doesn’t do or say anything about anything like the terrorism we are experiencing now or anything else for that matter. The news makes shit up. Hell I can’t even be sure he’s in Hawaii on vacation. It’s all a pack of lies. He is one big fat lie. He’s one big fat assed lazy bastard.

    • 10 tminu December 28, 2009 at 10:59 pm

      He can’t even be more blatantly disdainful; I mean what does he have to do give America the literal finger? Oh wait, he already did that!!
      He held up traffic racing to look into the son of his buddy who ostensibly got hurt in a surfing accident, but did not…yet he took 4 days to mention the Umar Panty Bomber and he had to give a shout out before mentioning the Hasan Ft. Hood terror incident…That’s TWELVE DOMESTIC TERROR HITS just since his unauguration and you’d think there were no “man-caused booboos” at all by his actions.


  5. 11 Bobby G December 30, 2009 at 3:52 pm


    A friend sent this along to me. I can’t think of a reason to disagree.

    I am sending this to virtually everybody on my e-mail list and that includes conservatives, liberals, and everybody in between. Even though we disagree on a number of issues, I count all of you as friends. My friend and neighbor wants to promote a “Congressional Reform Act of 2009”. It would contain eight provisions, all of which would probably be strongly endorsed by those who drafted the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Friends, please send me your recommendations on how this bill can be improved.

    I know many of you will say, “this is impossible”. Let me remind you, Congress has the lowest approval of any entity in Government, now is the time when Americans will join together to reform Congress – the entity that represents us.

    We need to get a Senator to introduce this bill in the US Senate and a Representative to introduce a similar bill in the US House. These people will become American hero’s.. Please send any ideas on how to get this done.


    A Fellow American


    Congressional Reform Act of 2010

    1. Term Limits: 12 years only, one of the possible options below.

    A. Two Six year Senate terms
    B. Six Two year House terms
    C. One Six year Senate term and three Two Year House terms

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

    2. No Tenure / No Pension:

    A congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

    3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security:

    All funds in the Congressional retirement fund moves to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, Congress participates with the American people.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, server your term(s), then go home and back to work.

    4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan just as all Americans.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

    5. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%..

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

    6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

    7. Congress must equally abide in all laws they impose on the American people.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.

    8. All contracts with past and present congressmen are void effective 1/1/11.

    The American people did not make this contract with congressmen, congressmen made all these contracts for themselves.

    Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, serve your term(s), then go home and back to work.
    If you agree with the above, pass it on to all in your address list. If not, just delete.

  1. 1 The United States Agricultural & Food Law and Policy Blog: Animal … | Food Health Wisdom Trackback on December 29, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Comments are currently closed.

December 2009
« Nov   Jan »

Recent Comments

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: