National Sovereignty Takes Another Hit

©2010 drkate

As reported here, here, and here, Obama has no problem ceding the sovereignty of the United States to the international community…he has no loyalty to America and it is so disgustingly obvious.  According to Big Government,

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan issued an Executive Order which gave permission to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) to operate within the boundaries of the United States.  Reagan’s EO put INTERPOL under the same basic guidelines as the CIA, FBI, ATF and other Federal law enforcement agencies.

Here is Obama’s late-year assault, another ‘quietly issued’ Executive Order in which he cedes yet more American sovereignty and jets off to a Hawaiian vacation:

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release
December 17, 2009

– – – – – – –

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.

INTERPOL is given diplomatic immunity for any property–including citizens–it may seize anywhere in the world, including the United States.

this international law enforcement body now operates – now operates – on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the FBI, and is immune from Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

According to ThreatsWatch,

In light of what we know and can observe, it is our logical conclusion that President Obama’s Executive Order amending President Ronald Reagans’ 1983 EO 12425 and placing INTERPOL above the United States Constitution and beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement is a precursor to more damaging moves.

And the National Review asks, “Why does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law?”, predicting that this is a likely  precursor to Obama allowing American citizens to be tried in the International Court at the Hague.

Interpol works closely with international tribunals such as the International Criminal Court (ICC)… and with foreign courts and law-enforcement authorities such as those in Europe that are investigating former Bush administration officials…

Bush had resisted any cooperation with the ICC on the premise it would expose U.S. troops to prosecution for war crimes.  In one sense, this also allows international access to not only U.S. soldiers, but to Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, and others…so this fits into Obama’s continued threat to prosecute CIA agents and initial sabre-rattling regarding prosecuting Bush administration officials.

Some Possible Explanations?

There are many angles here, certain to raise more questions than not.  At first view, it is of course unconstitutional, violating the right to privacy, exceeding the President’s Article II authority, and the Congress is abrogating its responsibility.

Everyone is looking the other way while America is being attacked, and now American civilians and military personnel are  the cannon fodder for someone elses policies.  The problem, in my view, is that any one or combination of these is plausible.

  • Timing. A critical look at the timing of Obama’s executive order is required.  Quietly signs the E.O.; jets off to Hawaii; a Christmas eve health care vote; Flight 253 and suspicious response; bombing of CIA employees in Afghanistan (what are they doing there?); continued financial transactions by the U.S. Treasury; and ACORN’s continued involvement in financial oversight. At the same time Obama’s poll numbers are tanking, this is (at least) the second major terrorist event inside the United States to happen on his watch in less than a year of office.
  • Blackmail?  Given that international agencies and governments probably know more about Obama than Americans, is this an exchange?  That is, quiet on Obama’s citizenship in exchange for access to Americans?
  • Ushering in the NWO?  Along with the blackmail above, is this the another way to invade and monitor Americans’ electronic, phone, communications, travel, or financial transactions?
  • Something bigger? Is Interpol onto something else, like this, this, or this? Lame Cherry, Political Pistachio Radio Revolution, Logistics Monster, and Atlas Shrugs are definitely sketching out a much broader picture. The ten most liberal cities in the U.S. ranked in order are:  Detroit, Gary, Berkeley, Washington, D.C., Oakland, Inglewood California, Newark,  Cambridge, Massachusetts, San Francisco  and Flint,Michigan. Chicago is no. 17 and New York, NY, is no. 21.

I’d be very interested in your thoughts.

37 Responses to “National Sovereignty Takes Another Hit”

  1. 1 terminu January 4, 2010 at 8:42 am

    His deliberate gestures of subservience and weakness are meant to bring on more violence to America.
    If you dressed up nicely and went to the rough ghetto in your nicest car, got out and started bowing to everyone you would be left for dead in no time.
    Obama brings out the bloodlust in our enemies.

  2. 2 Katie January 4, 2010 at 9:43 am

    And it’s not being mentioned in the lamestream media, much like the NBC issue. Which tells you how serious it is.

  3. 3 no-nonsence-nancy January 4, 2010 at 10:45 am

    I heard about this last week. It’s really scary. He is destroying us very rapidly. I think he is answering to so many people who he owes his job to and also they may be blackmailing him. I think the rest of world knows a lot more about him than most Americans do. What a coup they managed to accomplish! This tops anything ever tried in the world before. I say we have to get him out of our Oval Office very, very soon! We can’t wait until the next election. There probably won’t be one, anyway.

    Dr. Kate, do you know if the Articles of Freedom have been given to the White House, congress, the supremes,etc. yet?

    • 4 drkate January 4, 2010 at 10:54 am

      Nancy, we are planning a big roll out soon, probably all of us will go to DC. Each individual state delegate is going to hand deliver these to their state legislatures.

      We are still working on the document, and also planning the big event. I will keep you apprised! IN the meantime, there is no reason to delay getting the document out. Will be doing so here in Wyoming, and am as we speak.

  4. 5 Katie January 4, 2010 at 2:07 pm

    Here’s another view of this EO which ties in with yours, Dr. Kate.


    by Doug Cook

    (Jan. 4, 2010) — In a pattern of assault on liberties perpetrated by Barrack Hussein Obama, an executive order has been issued which effectively eliminates the centuries-old instrument of liberty, habeas corpus, from our charters of freedom.

    Obama has committed a long line of transgressions pertaining to liberties and freedoms in the United States, a pattern that in all cases removes or diminishes, but never promotes or increases, liberties and/or self-determination.

    Habeas corpus is an extremely crucial writ and most important governing tenet written into the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights and Declaration of Independence.

    At the time the original 13 American Colonies’ declared independence and became a constitutional republic in which the people were sovereign, any person, in the name of the people, could acquire the authority to initiate such writs. To this day, habeas corpus has remained an inviolate writ of law.

    By this act, Executive Order 13524, enacted by presidential writ, the singular bulwark protecting people from tyranny, which requires due process, and places the burden of proof pertaining to legal search and seizure, detention and prosecution squarely on the federal and state governments has been circumvented.

    By executive order from the White House, the heinous act of amending a sentence in President Ronald Reagan’s 1983 original Executive Order 12425, has resulted in removing a vital safeguard against tyranny and police state.

    The result of this executive order 13524 allows for arrest, detention, search and seizure and a slew of other acts of authoritarian and arbitrary action against persons at any time and any place for any reason without just cause or burden of proof. A most suspicious aspect portrayed as reason for executive order 13524 is to permit a foreign police organization to function and operate within US sovereign borders and territory, free of oversight and justification. It is in the most simple terms a complete breakdown and usurpation of natural and constitutional law.

    Barry Soreoto, also known as Barrack Hussien Obama the foreign born illegally elected President of The United States of America, has fundamentally undermined arguably the single most important protective law of our land. He has stated on numerous occasions publicly that the US Constitution is what is wrong with the Amerika he knows.


    Habeas Corpus is a century’s old law instrumental in the 12th century English creation of the Magna Carter; the predecessor to the US Constitution.

    Habeas corpus is of English origin, has profound historical importance as an instrument used for the safeguarding of individual freedom against arbitrary state action. (Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press. pg. 849.)

    Note that this executive order 13524 originates from the one person in the United States of America that has the sole singular duty of protecting the people from all enemies both foreign and domestic. Removing this instrument of Liberty is contradictory to every tenet, natural and governing law guaranteeing our most cherished freedoms and securing our way of life.

    The United States Constitution specifically included the English common law procedure in the Suspension Clause, Article 1, Section 9. It states:

    The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it.

    Note again the intent in Article 1, Section 9; “habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion”, if public safety is in danger.
    What cases of rebellion or invasion?

    If one takes the possiblility for suspending habeas corpus to another level, one could reason with logical results that a person who holds the power to change such laws has ulterior motives to do such. If there is no justifiable, evident cause for suspension as per constitutional and natural law, it gives reason to assume that Barrack Hussein Obama plans on instituting either marshal law, a police state, or establishing a dictatorship.

    There can be no other lawful reason for suspension; why should there be? The United States of America is a free law abiding God fearing nation full of decent hard working caring folks who have no ill will or ulterior motives against any body, entity or other nation.

    It is from others who originate from outside our borders who bear ill will and malice against us. Singular enemies have invaded our borders, but this does not constitute an invasion. We have the finest law enforcement organizations in the world that if required is more than capable of protecting public safety. It is performed by brave steadfast people in uniform gallantly 24/7.

    We have the finest fighting force in our military the world has ever known; what could possibly motivate a sitting President of The United States to by-pass these aforementioned protectors of the people?

    There are a few who originate within our borders who wish for usurpation of our Republic, who are known to be working towards these goals. Our governing articles of law and freedom safeguard us from overthrow from within. The very same laws that allow for freedoms of speech, thought, religion and right to seek redress of wrongs against these tenets of Liberty.

    Any person who violates these governing tenets of liberty and law by clandestine methods, without due and proper process of open clear intent and amendment is guilty of treason.

    No more, no less.

    • 6 drkate January 4, 2010 at 2:20 pm

      Thank you, THIS is the crux of the issue, which I really didn’t capture above. I will update with this post and link, thank you.

  5. 7 No-nonsense-nancy January 4, 2010 at 3:54 pm

    Thanks, Dr. Kate, for the info on the Articles of Freedom.

    And thanks, Katie, for the article you posted. I’ll try again to get through to my grown kids about this. I’ll send them the links to these posts. They have to get their heads out of the sand.

  6. 8 Katie January 4, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    YW. Nancy, send them this email as well. It’s a long post so I don’t want to fill up Dr. Kate’s comment section, but I urge EVERYONE reading this section to go to this link, read the post, and spread it around.


  7. 9 d2i January 4, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    dk – it’s great to see you covering this EO. My take on it is similar to the “Something Bigger” working theory.

    Back in September 2008 our markets tanked due to underhanded and fraudulent financial dealings perpetuated by Banks, Wall Street Hedge Funds, and our own government. This market collapse reverberated throughout the world resulting in country’s such as Iceland to go bankrupt. This by no means was a small matter. It had a global reach never seen before until that day.

    Our government has not held the first inquiry into what truly happened on that fateful day. No hearings by either body of the legislative branch has been held. The POTUS has demanded no accountability and instead gave Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac a big pile of money at the same time he signed this EO.

    IMHO, many decent, honest, hardworking people across the globe were robbed of their treasure on that day. I believed then as I do today this was an intentional and premeditated act.

    Therefore, I have to believe that the only body that can prosecute these thugs is the ICC. Interpol is their investigative arm. I’ve learned that on Dec. 2, 2009 nearly 600 forensic accountants, investigators and other personnel from Interpol descended on Washington, DC.

    In order to learn what transpired on that day Interpol must have carte blanche access to the Federal Reserve, Banking, US Treasury, Fannie and Freddie books. This is ground zero. They must be able to re construct what precipitated this grossest of fraudulent acts on the people of the world.

    Parochial thinking is of no use. Thinking the POTUS is demonstrating his NWO powers isn’t of use. Scare mongering by the right or the left is of no use. Interpol must have search and siezure powers as well as arresting powers to right this incredible wrong.

    I’ve also come to learn that Geithner and Kissinger have been tagged. Kissinger is under house arrest and Geithner is wearing an ankle monitor according to my sources. Paulson is now being held under arrest by the Brits.

    This is HUGE HUGE HUGE HUGE!!! I cannot emphasize this enough. Whether POTUS was forced to expand these powers under duress is a story I’m certain we will be learning about in the near future.

    • 10 terminu January 4, 2010 at 5:34 pm

      I think you need to use a speculum, for such speculation.

      • 11 d2i January 4, 2010 at 6:12 pm

        would that be a vaginal or anal speculum?

        moreover, why do you doubt. what source do you have to offer differing opinion? that is other than your own. my mind remains open and would welcome factually rather scare mongering sourced info coming from the right.

        • 12 Quantum Leap January 4, 2010 at 8:55 pm

          I do not doubt anything this thug-a-lug and his partners in crime do. I know better. Something is up because he looks like he swallowed a frog these days when he should look all rested and refreshed from a long exotic vacation. Somthing is definitely up. His poor kids. Whoever owns him will do him in after he does their bidding. That plan has been known for over a year and Nancy is the leader of it along with the London Brits. He should resign so they do not do him in. Nancy is two-faced.

    • 14 drkate January 4, 2010 at 6:16 pm

      This is an interesting link…and certainly this is part of the story. No wonder no one is covering it. I had been reading about bank arrests in London. I wonder where Geithner is…and Kissinger?

      • 15 d2i January 4, 2010 at 7:01 pm

        dk – Geithner is wearing an ankle monitor according to two sources from two different country’s. Both are financial investigative reporters. Apparently, he was arrested prior to 0 signing the EO.

        Kissinger, on the other hand, has disappeared from public view. But the same two sources independently verified his house arrest.

        That’s what I know. At some point I will post links to the reports. Both are subscription but one does post reports for the public, but more detail in the subscription reports. And yes, I trust both sources.

        • 16 drkate January 4, 2010 at 7:20 pm


          Do you think Obama knows what is up? And wouldn’t he be a target? And in a twisted way, would he be relying on his ineligibility in order to eventually have it overturned?

          Keep it up, d2i, and keep me apprised!! 😯

          • 17 d2i January 4, 2010 at 9:19 pm

            I had a long response prepared as a reply to your questions, dk, but my cat, who loves to lay on my keyboard, deleted it. He loathes my computer b/c it takes away attention from him. ugh.

            That said, yes, Obama knows. He knew in Sept 08. Recall his rather cavalier attitude when it happened. Contrast that w/McCain’s reaction clearly 0 knew then what the thugs were up to. Also recall, McCain lost all zeal, energy and fight to go on. Remember, many of us were commenting on it at that time. That man was shaken and he showed it. Sarah, on the other hand, I do not believe learned the details until long after she returned to Alaska.

            Now the twisted part…hhhhmmmm…never thought about it that way…I’ll get back with you on that…it’s a helluva thought.

            Goodnight and look forward to picking this conversation back up in the morning.

  8. 18 Kathy January 4, 2010 at 8:11 pm

    Great article. I posted a link at

    Please pass the following information on to as many people as possible. We need many, many petitioners in order to draw attention to the issue. Thanks

    Hawaii Petition Campaign Launched!

  9. 19 laura January 4, 2010 at 8:16 pm

    Sounds to me like INTERPOL is a foreign invader. Who cares what the Executive Order states. This is America – land of the free and home of the brave. An Executive Order is hogwash, unconstitutional, and we the people rule.

  10. 20 terminu January 4, 2010 at 8:52 pm

    “U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is now under house arrest and wearing an ankle bracelet with a tracker and a voice monitor. The United States is currently owned by virtue of $64 trillion debt to foreign powers. Paulson is in U.K. custody in Bermuda. The whole shoddy “Box Gang” aint getting paid.
    With all my LOVE.
    Lucian Coulson.”
    But where does this come from? Is it a rumor plant? I don’t see a source.

    • 21 terminu January 4, 2010 at 9:01 pm
      “Mr. Charlton replies: There is a fictional writer out there who is writing a fictional account of present history. Unfortunately a lot of folks think he is writing history. If Kissinger was under house arrest, I assure you it would be on every front page in the world. Its not, because he is not. Nor is Geithner, for the same reason.

      Folks, always check sources; you can trace these back to a novelist…not a journalist…not even a citizen-journalist…and the originator gives no sources other than his own fancies…”

      • 22 d2i January 4, 2010 at 9:08 pm

        Unfortunately, there are two independent sources stating similar facts. I didn’t necessarily trust the first source. Indeed, it took me nearly 18 months, but then, I stumbled on a second source totally independent and on an entirely different continent who was stating similar facts. Honestly, I was shocked. But there it was and he had even more details.

        Who btw is the blogger Charlton is referring to? I’d like to know. Triangulating does no one any good. Who is Charlton referring too?

    • 23 d2i January 4, 2010 at 9:03 pm

      aha! You are seeking. You go girl or guy!!!

      I’ve turned folks on to my sources and have been dismissed too many times. Not ridiculed, thankfully, just dismissed. I’ve been trying to get folks to understand that what happened in 2008 was criminal.

      If you’re nice to me and don’t tell me to use a speculum again I might consider sharing the newest report tomorrow when I see it.

  11. 24 Quantum Leap January 4, 2010 at 9:02 pm

    For one I can vouch that the debt amount is correct, only I thought it was more like 57 trillion. You won’t hear this on lame stream media. If part of it is true then is it safe to agree that the remainder is true too even without a source?

  12. 26 Leza January 4, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    I’m trying not to get involed with this, but this seems to be round two of the jbjd attack. What is her problem? Why does she not come out and talk with you about this rather than attack you. My blood is boiling right now. Please by all means remove this post after you read it, I just wanted to make you aware of it.


    The commenter questioned my motivation and intention for not enveloping wholesale the work of the CC2009. Here, in large part, is my reply.

    I just thought of a specific example that illustrates the results of assigning the task of interpreting a legal document – the U.S. Constitution – to a person lacking the requisite legal training.

    Article I of the Constitution creates the Legislative branch of government. Section 8, which enumerates the specific powers of Congress, includes this provision: “To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;”

    The Ph.D. heading the eligibility committee wrote this on her blog (all mistakes are in original):

    The “Law of Nations” is a body of law that the Founders respected and understood to be a guiding body of law for all nations. Thus, the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ must also be found in that body of law called ‘the law of nations’.

    Then, in constructing the Resolution of the CC2009 on the issue of eligibility, she wrote:

    WHEREAS, the CC2009 finds that until the Supreme Court rules on the natural born citizen eligibility clause, or the Congress amends the Constitution, the acceptable definition of ‘natural born citizen’ is derived from that body of law referred to as the ‘Law of Nations’, referenced in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution; and

    WHEREAS, the reference to the Law of Nations in Article I is a direct recognition that the Founders respected this body of law; and

    WHEREAS, in writing about that body of law, Emmich Vattel defined a natural born citizen[i]:

    To be a natural born citizen means one must be born on the soil of parents who themselves are citizens.

    A legal analysis of the Constitution would not only not yield this result but in fact would conclude persuasively just the opposite. That is, in interpreting the intention of the drafters of a legal text, judges will find that, where the drafters included specific qualifying language in one section of the text; their failure to include this language in another section of the text was intentional. In other words, if the Drafters of the Constitution had intended for us to rely on “the law of nations” to define who is eligible to be POTUS in Article II; they knew how to do that, given their use of those words in Article I to define the power of Congress to regulate crime between and among other countries on the high seas.

    Plus, the Ph.D. provided no basis given for interpreting the phrase “law of nations” as specifically referencing the text assembled by Vattel versus a generally accepted ‘law of nations’ as applied to conflicts on the high seas.

    • 27 drkate January 5, 2010 at 12:20 am

      Well, I conclude she is an angry woman. And ‘sticks and stones’ and all that. She is a victim and is acting just exactly as a well-trained lawyer who does not understand the constitution.

      Thanks for the heads up, but I will move on.


    • 29 drkate January 5, 2010 at 1:29 am

      sheesh! 🙄

      • 30 d2i January 5, 2010 at 6:52 am

        ok – here’s my take on Beck. This man hasn’t uttered a word about the birthers in over a year and a half. if he has, which I’m unaware, it would have been minimal.

        so, ask yourself why now? and why not on the Glenn Beck hour last night? not a peep.

        what has he been preaching about for what seems like forever now? if you thought the Constitution you’d be correct. now, why would he all of a sudden dismiss Article II? and it’s importance to our national security and troops w/all of the jihadist activity we are dealing with?

        my take is he is playing bad cop to who knows yet good cop. if you were to extract just his comments from yesterday’s show you might be surprised by what i believe he is really saying. just a hunch. but for someone who has never chided the birthers before now, i found his behavior way out of the norm we see. so, if my hunch is right, who might be the good cop?

        • 31 drkate January 5, 2010 at 11:14 am

          Would it be Rush?

          • 32 d2i January 5, 2010 at 12:16 pm

            Glenn threw out red meat yesterday and today everyone is reporting on his dismissive remarks and I mean everyone. Thus, it elevates the issue and gives the story legs. My hunch is Rush. He’s the #1 talk show host in the country AND Clear Channel, one of the radio conglomerates Haggmann and CFP referred to in their recent radio interview, has cancelled Rush’s show in the Triad area in NC. I’m sure there are other’s doing the same thing.

  13. 33 lman January 5, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    As you may know, Google censors for this admin as it has for China .. promoting propaganda to top of searches and either blocking or suppressing the rest several pages deep.

    Try IntelliFetch at .. every bit as good and without the censorship or tracking your search history. Give it a try, think you’ll like it.

  1. 1 Blackmailing Obama « drkatesview Trackback on January 5, 2010 at 1:28 am
  2. 2 Blackmailing Obama « drkatesview Trackback on January 10, 2010 at 10:55 pm
  3. 3 uberVU - social comments Trackback on January 25, 2010 at 1:39 am
Comments are currently closed.

January 2010

Recent Comments

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: