The Unconstitutional Obama

©2010 drkate

(Update:  Links to articles describing the Kerchner appeal brief are provided at the end of the article.  Plus, only 51% percent of Americans believe Obama is eligible)

On the one- year anniversary of the filing of the Kerchner v. Obama case, Revolution Radio is pleased welcome plaintiff Charles Kerchner and attorney Mario Apuzzo to tonight’s blog talk radio show, beginning at 7:30 pm MST.

From Kerchner’s press release:

Attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed the Appellant’s Opening Brief in the Kerchner et al v Obama et al lawsuit Appeal. The Brief was filed with the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia PA on 19 Jan 2010.  See this link to download a copy and read it.

We look forward to the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing this matter and ordering a trial on the merits as to the Article II Constitutional eligibility of Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the military.

We say Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” of the USA and thus is not eligible to serve in the Oval Office. Obama is a Usurper and must be removed to preserve the integrity and fundamental law of our Constitution and our Republic.

“We the People” will be heard on this matter! As the People in Massachusetts have demonstrated, “We the People” are the Sovereigns in this country and the Constitution is the fundamental law of our nation, not Obama or Congress. We will not be silenced.  The chair Obama sits in in the Oval Office is not his throne. It is the People’s seat too.  And Obama despite all his obfuscations to date must prove to Constitutional standards that he is eligible to sit in that seat.

This is not going to go away until Obama stops hiding ALL his hidden and sealed early life documents and provides original copies of them to a controlling legal authority and reveals his true legal identity from the time he was born until the time he ran for President. Obama at birth was born British and a dual-citizen. He holds and has held multiple citizenships during his life-time.

He’s a Citizenship chameleon as the moment and time in his life suited him and he is not a “natural born Citizen” with singular and sole allegiance and Citizenship at birth to the USA as is required per the Constitution per the intent of our founders and the meaning of the term “natural born Citizen” to Constitutional standards.

The Coward-in-Chief®  has succeeded in hiding his background from the American people for two years now, but the question of his eligibility to serve won’t EVER go away until he provides some modicum of respect to Americans and America and comes clean.

Please join us tonight for a lively discussion!

Defend our Liberties

Updates: Court told Obama is a security risk.

Only 51% of Americans believe Obama is eligible.

22 Responses to “The Unconstitutional Obama”


  1. 1 KJ Kaufman January 20, 2010 at 2:13 pm

    I am really excited for tonight’s show. Thanks so much for lining them both up to speak on your program tonight.

  2. 2 jtx January 20, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    It should be VERY informative if you’ve ever listened to them in the past – a real pair to draw to!!!

    And here’s a couple of informative links on the subject (along with a bit of fun):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsX5DzZHkIU Three Little Words

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNGG8tIJNMY Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!

  3. 3 d2i January 20, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Looking forward to tonights show dk. I’ll definitely be tuning in.

  4. 4 Katie January 20, 2010 at 4:46 pm

    Dr. Kate – have you seen or heard anything about this???

    Supreme Court announces a special session for tomorrow.

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/court-sets-unusual-special-session-for-thursday/

  5. 6 Papoose January 20, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    The guy is not 100%
    American. There’s nothing to debate.

    He loses. He pujured himself. His Self.

    The Chief Justice deliberately broke the law. This is debatable. Why?

    Monkey see. Monkey do, or else, ever since.

    Thugs. AntiAmerican Sneaks.

  6. 7 Quantum Leap January 20, 2010 at 6:10 pm

    Basking in the glow. See how Coakley’s own volunteers didn’t want her. This is her phone bank on Monday Jan 18, 2010.

  7. 8 Papoose January 20, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    Perjury. Hmmm,
    Purple lips flapping.

    Isn’t there a law about lying under oath? Probably why there’s all those failed Law Suits due to jurisdiction and lack of standing.

    I think even Vital Statics in Hawaii may have a few complaints to answer.

    Was thrilled to see Mario A update today!

    If we could only get to discovery and deposition.

    Something to look forward to, I hope.

  8. 9 Right Now January 21, 2010 at 9:43 am

    I am listening to the broadcast again today and I still am confused as to how we require people to swear that they meet the requirements for potus if nbc is not defined.

    • 10 drkate January 21, 2010 at 10:24 am

      NBC is defined tho, in the Constitution and the laws that were recognized by the founders.

      What is happening is people are taking advantage of this and defining it as they like, i,e, ‘born in the usa’.

      But perhaps the biggest obfuscation is to be discussing the concept and arguing about it, while even the most basic of documents has not been provided by Obama.

      So we argue over NBC while Obama skates, never having to show any identification to be swept into the Presidency

      It is outrageous, and Obama will be scorned forever.

      • 11 Right Now January 21, 2010 at 11:20 am

        Exactly my thoughts. You can ignore the definition if you choose because you can say it has never been to the supreme court. I say the founding father’s never even meant for the supreme court to define it. It is what it is, no explanation required.

        • 12 drkate January 21, 2010 at 11:26 am

          “I say the founding father’s never even meant for the supreme court to define it.”

          Very well said. My sentiments exactly.

          • 13 terminu January 21, 2010 at 4:27 pm

            It is “natural born citizen” because there’s NO other allegiances involved.

            Really! What other nationality could a baby possibly have if both its parents are US citizens and it was born on US soil? None!
            No other nation can lay claim, and that’s the entire point of being a “natural born citizen”!
            To me, this is so “duh”. They need to make a mountain out of molehill on this to keep people confused, when really it’s so utterly simple. The president should have unpolluted allegiance to only America. Period.

            Also, look at it this way…

            Obama, having one US citizen parents, is by definition a statutory citizen per US Code 1401/14th amendment.

            Therefore, per Article II, he thus cannot possibly be a natural born citizen, since no statutory citizen can ever be a natural born citizen. Ever.

            Statutory citizens all require laws because there’s always some other nation-claim involved. Natural born citizens, are pure as the driven snow organic natural born citizens, no other country has any interest in that baby by citizenship or allegiance, and this is the high standard for national security required for the presidency.

            • 14 drkate January 21, 2010 at 4:54 pm

              also, natural born also means that one is born into a state of citizenship, a citizenship that is not determined by any act of law, like ‘naturalization’.

        • 16 ksdb January 21, 2010 at 4:05 pm

          You make an interesting point. The founders may not have meant it to go the Supreme Court as they would have felt it was a commonly understood concept. Certainly they wouldn’t foresee future laws and amendements to the Constitution and subsequent SCOTUS interpretations that would later work to alter the understanding of the concept. It is no longer perceived as it was by the founders and I believe that it’s going to take a lot of work to change people’s minds that it means anything other than native born.

          • 17 Right Now January 21, 2010 at 5:37 pm

            That is the insidious way that the constitution is attacked. I do not like the idea of going to SCOTUS although I am not too concerned since there is precedence. The videos of all those in congress who nonchalantly refer to his COLB on the internet sickens me and I believe fain ingorance is not excusable for those in Washington. I think the new billboard should be “quo warranto”. Who would stop it? No one knows what it means.

  9. 18 d2i January 21, 2010 at 11:29 am

    dk – send this to Mario and Kerchner, this says it all. love this guy!!!

    • 19 drkate January 21, 2010 at 12:23 pm

      Done, d2i!! And also captured here on vpod. Thank you very much.

      I also wanted to thank you for calling in last night to the show. You raised excellent points and suggestions.

      Way cool! How’s your website coming?

      Thank you again.

      • 20 d2i January 22, 2010 at 2:25 pm

        Thanks dk. You know me, I always love to share my thoughts and opinions. Which is the chief reason why I’m starting my own blog. That said, the programmer is still working on it but all of the design elements are done. You’re on my first launch list. I have four of them now.

  10. 21 boggartblog February 5, 2010 at 1:06 pm

    i Dr Kate,
    Off topic but nice to see you and where is Texas Darlin’ I miss her lively blog.

    The Obama problem may yet be resolved by the Democrats. Like our Labour Party in Britain they believe in power at any price in order to push “the agenda” and once they see Barry is a surefire loser in 2012 he might just be pushed under a truck (metaphorically speaking of course – his suppoerters are such literalists) before then.

    http://www.greenteethmm.com/dailystirrer.shtml#change_cant_believe


  1. 1 Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate – Wed, 20 Jan 2010, 9:30 p.m. EST « CDR Kerchner's Blog Trackback on March 4, 2010 at 10:21 am
Comments are currently closed.



January 2010
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,836,661 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS The Post & Email

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

%d bloggers like this: