The Usurper and the Courts

©2010 drkate

Obama is running out of tricks, and running out of room to derail the legal cases against his usurpation of the Presidency of the United States. His distaste for Americans  is even more evident now: taxpayers are footing the bill while Obama uses the Justice Department  against Americans, and against the Constitution.

But every day, he is exposed even more, and it is only fitting that whatever past he has catches up to him in real time.  He will crack with the increasing pressure, so let’s keep it up.  Narcissists cannot stand to be proven wrong, but once the little humpty dumpty falls off the wall, no one will even want to put him back together again.

Hoping to derail the Kerchner v. Obama and Congress case by employing technicalities of law,  specifically, the length of the brief submitted by Kerchner, the “Justice” Department lost.  By order dated February 22, 2010, the Honorable Circuit Judge Michael A. Chagares on behalf of the Motion’s Panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file the overlength brief.

From Attorney Apuzzo’s press release:

This is great news because the case will now continue forward as scheduled. Obama’s and Congress’s opposition brief was initially due on February 22, 2010. The Department of Justice obtained a 14-day extension to file that brief, making the new due date March 8, 2010. After they file their opposition brief, I will then have 14 days within which to file a reply to that brief. All briefs will be posted at this blog and it is my hope that the public will read these briefs so as to stay fully informed on this issue that is critically important not only to my clients but also to our Constitutional Republic.

The technicalities of law used by Obama’s legal team include the following:

The Kechner v Obama and Congress case is one of the most meticulously written and researched cases on the subject of Obama’s lack of eligibility.  Revolution Radio interviewed Kerchner and Apuzzo on January 20 and the interview can be found here. Read the brief, you will learn immensely.

All of the black-robed justices to date have run for cover of technicality to avoid addressing the case facts. Whether or not the three-judge panel will actually hear the evidence, and allow oral arguments, is a matter of courage.  Think about that.

How dare they think about their careers when the national security of the United States is at risk!

"The price of liberty is eternal vigilance"

15 Responses to “The Usurper and the Courts”

  1. 1 terminu February 23, 2010 at 6:01 am

    Given that “Obama” is a fictionalized person, one wonders what or who was so amateurish to not give him solid vitals and to meet constitutional eligibility standards, since his family is made-up anyway. And why are his fake documents so poorly done? This was enough to fool “enough” Americans, who vastly now see him for the fake he is, but given the “importance” of their crime, you’d think they’d do a bang-up job about it. Now they have to scurry and cover their tracks and fight off lawsuits, and eventually one will penetrate and expose everything about the fraud Obama. Maybe his handlers are stupider and more inept than we originally even thought.

  2. 2 d2i February 23, 2010 at 7:03 am

    I remain convinced that the D’s are blackmailing the R’s and the R’s are blackmailing the D’s. Or maybe it’s 0 who is blackmailing both. Who knows?

    Back during the 2006 mid-term election, the D’s pounced on and drove home the need to thoroughly investigate the Bush administration for the invasion into Iraq. Why were really there etc. Some D’s even whispered impeachment. Once they got elected, we D’s were alarmed by Pelosi’s decision to not investigate. What happened? Why no investigation?

    It was b/w 2006 – 2008 that the shenanigans in Congress began regarding eligibility for both men. Yeah, I know we tend to focus on SR511 BUT Senate heard testimony from Frank and I believe Dodd on their definition of NBC. This is circumstantial but why would Frank & Dodd advocate one definition while Lindsey Graham argued another? Something stinks to high heaven here.

    The D’s have the goods on Bush and Company which explains why Cheney didn’t open the floor for nays when it came time for congress to vote 0 in.

    The R’s, on the other hand, have the goods on 0 and his lack of eligibility which is why I believe Rove pretended to help Brazille behind the scenes to get 0 elected. She may have been played or her acts were intentional. Who knows? But there is no one on earth that could convince me that Bush and Company didn’t do opposition research on 0; especially after the break in at State. The R’s have a file probably a foot thick on him, his family, his friends, his associates, pictures, birth cert and more.

    They are playing this juvenile game at the expense of the people and restoring the vitality of the Republic. I’m damned sick of it. All of them need to go – R and D and the entire administration!

    • 3 Beckwith February 23, 2010 at 3:48 pm

      The Republican Party is complicit in Obama’s coup d’état.  They became a party to the conspiracy, and the Democrats compromised the Republican candidate when Leahy and company “resolved” that John McCain was/is a “natural born” citizen.  He isn’t, and was/is equally ineligible to serve as CiC.

      The Democrats neutered McCain who never said a word about Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Alice Palmer, and the rest of the communists, socialists, black nationalists, and other assorted dirtbags that form Obama’s closest and longest lasting relationships and associations.

      Most members of Congress are attorneys.  The judges too.  They all studied the Constitution.  They know the law (at least enough to pass the bar).  They know Obama is ineligible, but they made a deal with the devil and now have to live with it.

  3. 4 No-nonsense-nancy February 23, 2010 at 8:03 am

    I say, do away with the party system. George Washington advised against having a party system. Elect candidates according to their personal qualifications, policies and beliefs. Make sure that they are going to live up to their campaign promises before voting for them. It would eliminate a lot of problems.

  4. 5 tiger 7 February 23, 2010 at 8:47 am

    Yes, I believe the RNC as well as the Clinton machine have a big file on BHO but won’t use it. Why, I don’t know unless they don’t want to take on the backlash they would incur. Truely a sad state of affairs for the country.
    Or, maybe the One World group (Soros, World Bank, et al) hold such a threat over both parties that no one dares to make a wave—regardless of the cost to the USA.
    Who knows, but like most of you folfs, I don’t trust a single one of those who are supposed to represent we the people!!

  5. 7 jtx February 23, 2010 at 11:18 am

    Actually, Obama’s whole life seems to be nothing but a work of fiction. The man has never shown himself to be Constitutionally eligible to hold the office he now occupies.

    If you’d like to see something from a different point of view, watch the two short videos below which, even though they start slowly and have a bit of fun, contain a wealth of factual data – more than we’ve seen from Obama.

    In fact in the second video a famous senator is quoted speaking about someone that sounds for all the world like “Our Boy” and really strikes a chord.

    Only thing is the senator was the Roman named Cicero speaking in 42 BC – but the message is still very directed and pertinent for all of us:

    Three Little Words

    Merry Christmas OmeriKa!!

    If you go to the Mario Apuzzo website and actually read the Initial Appeals Brief of Jan 19, 2010, you’re in for a real eye-opener (as are the DOJ attorneys “defending” Obama using our tax money).

    That’s doubly ironic since these attorneys – and their bosses – took an oath to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign AND domestic but they are now in the position of actually attacking that very document rather than defending it and are trying to get an obviously ineligible man to remain in an office he has never shown himself to be eligible to hold.

    The wonderful Apuzzo Brief is a primer on both Constitutional law, the meaning of it, the Founders’ intent vis-a-vis Article II of the Constitution and a forceful put-down of the lies and misinformation put forth by the Obama Flying Monkeys such as “smrstrauss” and others.

    I’d urge everyone to read the Initial Appeals Brief from Attorney Apuzzo’s website along with the many essays by both Mario Apuzzo AND his Lead Plaintiff, Charles F. Kerchner. While there, it would really help to donate even a small amount to the publicity/education fund presently used only for full-page newspaper ads in the Washington Times National Weekly Edition.

    The Brief gives a very good overview of the original action AND it puts the lie to the many false arguments by the Obot Flying Monkeys about why BHO is either (their words) eligible to hold the office he now occupies OR that it (their words) doesn’t matter that he is not eligible. Your understanding of the relation of the U. S. Constitution to We The People will be forever enlightened.

  6. 8 Quantum Leap February 23, 2010 at 2:02 pm

    Orly ran to the UN for protection as they are using thuggery tactics on her like vandalism, death threats, and more on her.
    The mutt in chief literally makes me sick to my stomach. Everyone is blackmailing everyone including foreigners blackmailing the self-proclaimed mutt.
    He thinks lies and cheating go without any consequences. Well Karma is alive and well.
    Look at this recent lie of his: Obama Calls for Increasing Payroll Taxes on ‘Households’ Earning Less Than $250,000 Per Year
    Tuesday, February 23, 2010

    Obama new health care plan calls for raising the Medicare payroll tax on some households earning less than $250,000, an apparent breach of his campaign pledge not to raise taxes on families earning less than that amount. The president’s plan also calls for increasing taxes on interest, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents.

    and these: Obama’s Proposal Includes Individual Health Insurance Mandate
    ( – The health care plan proposed by Obama on Monday includes an individual mandate requiring every American to have health insurance, despite concerns from Republican lawmakers and legal experts that the provision is not constitutional. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told that he is not aware of any legal review of this question by the White House.

    Obama Administration Sinking Millions Into Government-Run Health Care for Children
    ( – While Democrats and Republicans disagree on establishing a government-run health insurance plan as part of health care reform, such programs already exist – and are thriving. On Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced that 10 states will share $100 million in federal grants to improve health care quality and delivery systems for children enrolled in Medicaid and in the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)

  7. 9 Kiltie February 23, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    Obama is a trojan horse, and from the belly of that Trojan Horse pour out the enemy, his cronies and traitors, with appointment after appointment. Praying for his downfall, and soon.

  8. 10 Quantum Leap February 23, 2010 at 2:16 pm

    Oh did you guys read he’s trying to get his repartions through before he’s kicked out of office? His orginal plan was to start this in his second term. LOL If only 22% approve of him now think of what it’ll be in a couple years.
    Black farmers – possibly over 70,000 of them – will get cash payments and debt relief from the federal government totaling $1.25 billion, in reparation for alleged racial discrimination suffered under the Department of Agriculture’s loan programs, the Obama Administration has agreed.

  9. 11 susan h February 23, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    When Obama ran for Senator here in Illinois, I saw him on a local television station speaking to school children. Obama was very unknown as the time, yet he somehow got special privileges, like his own television appearance on local news. One of the school children asked him if he was in favor of reparations for slavery. He answered that he was not, that he was going to be senator for ALL the people and could not single out one group to favor them with special compensation. At the time, I believed what he said and thought he meant it. Several years later, it is clear Obama does not mean anything he ever said. He is always saying what some want to hear, or not saying what others do not want to hear. I wonder if he even remembers anything he has ever promised to anyone, or if he cares.

  10. 12 GM February 23, 2010 at 9:45 pm

    They say that people get the government that they deserve. Only 53% of voters were stupid enough to ignore the screaming evidence and vote for Obamageddon, either because they trusted the lying left-wing media, or wanted to get rid of Bush/McCain regardless of consequences, or because they were actually left wing “progressive” Liberals and wanted what is happening now.

    We have an unparalleled disaster, with Obama/Pelosi/Reid and co., along with Marxist Czars and Geithener/Bernanke. We MUST get control of Congress this year and I don’t mean with RINO’s. That should be THE overriding priority.

    If the left rams through Obamacare: The Sequel with reconcilaiation, it will only increase our margin of victory. I actually hope taht tyhe eliminate the filibuster rule, so taht we can unwind their entire agenda with a simpole majority next year.

    If we can get Obama declareed ineligible, everything he did and said since 1/20/09 will be null and void. There’s a GOAL, huh?

  11. 13 Quantum Leap February 24, 2010 at 12:54 am

    Has anyone listened to the “Biggest Game in Town” video? It’s quite interesting. This is big. It’s about how states and gov are not really broke etc.

  12. 14 Noto February 26, 2010 at 4:43 am

    Interesting and informative. I wait for the next article.

  1. 1 uberVU - social comments Trackback on February 25, 2010 at 2:49 am
Comments are currently closed.

February 2010
« Jan   Mar »

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: