Lies that Bind

©2010 drkate

Starting nearly from scratch to uncover the truth of the Constitution, and constructing a pathway forward through the constitutional crises we face, author Martin Babitz begins with a basic question, and an answer:

“if our federal government can do whatever it deems proper, controlled only by our mere right to elect or re-elect certain officials every few years, what makes our system different, providing greater liberty than all the others that have free elections but are dominated by a supreme national government?  Nothing.”

We have been taught to believe that federal power is limited only by ‘checks and balances’ among branches of government against each other, and the authority of the people to elect officials in those branches every few years.  Indeed, judicial decision-making regarding standing in the constitutional case of Obama’s usurpation confirms this view: this critical issue is relegated to the ballot box (via the political question) or dismissed due to some fictional standing argument about the branches of government.

The problem for the government and the justices is that the people are waking up.  We get it now, so no amount of bamboozling is going to put us back to sleep.

The Big Lies that Control

Lie No. 2.  Federal Supremacy: think Obama v. Arizona, again using our tax dollars and his usurped power to attack us.

At the heart of the lies that control the people is the one that states the federal government has supremacy over state government and its right to absolutely invalidate state laws in its sole discretion.  This is known as the ‘federal supremacy clause’, though I know of no such ‘clause’ in the Constitution and now know its a lawyer’s invention.

The testing of this principle is in full view right now as the Obama (mal)administration prepares to sue Arizona over its immigration law.  Every other aggressive action, including the health care bill, industrial limitations, drilling bans, economic hardship, and forced income taxes, can also be seen as the ‘institutionalization’ of federal supremacy while they have the crop of judges in place to do so.

With specific respect to Arizona, it is imperative that every state in the Union join Arizona as against the federal government.  Each state governor, attorney general, and state legislator needs to be pressured to join Arizona.

While democrats and republicans will voice concerns over the lawsuit, it is only because it could jeopardize their political chances in upcoming elections.

Don’t forget Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution:

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

This includes protecting the states from invasion and aggressive action from the federal government.  This would also prohibit, in my opinion, the wholesale conversion of state economies to socialism, or the invasion of ‘world policies’ into state governments.

Make no mistake:  Obama, the democrats, and the republican enablers are all in the midst of a wholesale assault on every aspect of American society and our Constitutional Republic.  For what?  Control, money and power.  Crass, obtuse, in-humane.

Lie No. 3:  The Supreme Court Reigns

A lie that goes hand in hand with the lie of ‘federal supremacy’, according to Babitz , is the one that suggests that

the United States Supreme Court has unilateral authority over the meaning of the Constitution, including the power to construct’ it beyond recognition and usurp reserved sovereign powers from the states and their people.

The famous case of Marbury v. Madison is often cited as the “rationale’ for this lie…the case is often referred to the seminal case in which the Supreme Court exercised its right to review actions of Congress for consistency with the Constitution.

But that was when the constitution actually meant something, in 1803.  One wonders if this case triggered the original Thirteenth Amendment, which would have prevented lawyers from serving in government.  Certainly the Supreme Court and case law has had a dramatic effect on the people’s understanding of the Constitution.  Think of  whole generations of lawyers in the United State trained to undermine the Constitution!  No wonder only a handful stand right now.

Should the Supreme Court rule on the NBC definition, in light of their definite role in allowing this constitutional crisis to unfold? Especially with the effort to plant decidedly anti-American and unconstitutional people to the court by the unconstitutional Obama?

Babitz notes that words must “have fixed meanings in order to convey definite concepts”, such as that of ‘natural born citizen’.  As Attorney Mario Apuzzo has pointed out, the words “natural born citizen”, which convey a concept to ensure a national security safeguard in the Commander in Chief position, had and continues to have definite, discernible meaning.  That we all defer to the Supreme Court to decide this meaning, in such a dangerous time as today, just shows how deep this lie has penetrated our entire paradigm.

I know the Founders did not write those specific words with the intent that 233 years later, we would all of a sudden claim ignorance and need a battery of lawyers to figure that term out.  The Courts have behaved in a manner that invents a problem in interpretation and standing to avoid the constitution’s clear meaning.

Lie No. 4:  Government can take and redistribute your property at will.

At the heart of the socialist direction of the demo-communists and usurper Obama is the lie that our

property can be taken and redistributed at will by the federal government , either by direct means of taxation and expenditures, or through control and manipulation of the economy and money supply.

The serious market manipulation began it seems with Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the illegal 16th Amendment.  When the people and the states became too prosperous, the government invaded. I should really say that the corporations and the money men, who bought the politicians in government to do their bidding, used their power to invade.

State governments, including governors, attorneys general, legislatures, mayors, county commissioners, all must begin to advise their constituents that participation in the income tax program is voluntary…it says so right on the form.  Individuals must begin to grapple with the decisions necessary and preparations required to literally starve the federal beast to the best of their ability and circumstances.

With this much power amassed over decades, the federal government is an entity unto itself, accountable to no one.  It has lost any authority it ever had as it has refused to be governed by its constituents.

Lie No. 5.  The First Amendment and Bill of Rights only applies to State Governments, not the federal government.

The First Amendment lie is a big one, which asserts that the First Amendment and the Bill of Rights serve only to protect individuals from the state government, not the federal government.  Although I don’t think this lie is as ingrained as it could be, in that most people recognize the Bill of Rights as our rights vis a vis the federal government, there are a ‘long train of abuses’ that suggest the politicians have been undermining our rights for a very long period of time.  To wit:

  • Over 15 years of consistent petitioning of the Government to respond to grievances regarding the war powers, taxation, spending,foreign policy, and the illegally instituted amendments to the Constitution without any response.  Such a response leads to basically the understanding that government does not care, and does not respond.  Rather than being funny anymore, it is at the heart of our rights to have a responsive government, indeed, to govern our government!
  • The creeping police state, and political correctness, the race card and outright racism, alinsky tactics, and the media used to ridicule, diminish, and eliminate dissent.  Michelle Obama, the hateful spouse of the hateful usurper, recently made it clear that the role of black people is to use race and get more aggressive, aka, in your face, about…hmm, lets see, communism?  Hate against white people?  Anything other than the failure that is the Obamas in doing one single thing for black people in this country.  Voicing dissent against obama is now the new ‘hate speech’.
  • The absolute tyranny shown by Obama in every facet of American life since he took office, and the compliance of all three branches of government.

Knowing the Lies is the First Step

The first step in restoring our constitutional republic is acknowledging the lies, and coming to grips with how these have affected our lives.  Be prepared, because,

The truth will set you free–but first it will piss you off (gloria steinhem)

Red Beckman’s Walls in Our Minds also focused on the lies we have been told, with an emphasis on how they have created barriers to the truth about who we are, our government, our responsibilities, and the yoke of slavery we all inhabit right now.

The test of this truth is not how we compare to others–being ‘more fortunate’.  The test is truly whether we have liberty, and whether we even know what that truly is.

The out of control federal government has brought this to our doorsteps.  It is time to bring it to theirs.  There is only one way we can talk with the government, and that is when they put their violence away and start being Constitutionalists.  To the federal government, reboottherepublic emphasizes:

Put down the gun, then we’ll talk.”

54 Responses to “Lies that Bind”

  1. 1 no-nonsense-nancy July 14, 2010 at 4:40 pm

    Dr Kate, very good article. George Carlin was so right. They don’t care about Americans, they just want to control us. We need to act now to reverse this terrible blow to our republic. We can’t take it any longer.

    BTW, are you having your show on Revolution Radio tonight? It doesn’t show up on BTR. Only Politics 101 does. I missed it last week because I didn’t think you were on and then I saw it in the archives and listened to it.

    • 2 Chance July 17, 2010 at 3:24 pm

      what happened to the planning of the velvet revolution Rep King recently talked about. this was talked about way back in March and before. It is time to get serious about this. We cannot wait until elections in Nov. Even that is way too far away.

      We need velvet revolution ASAP. THE DOJ is now known to be corrupt. We have no laws therefore no Constitution in their eyes. We must take care of this problem NOW!

  2. 3 tiger 7 July 14, 2010 at 5:07 pm

    This is weighty stuff and well worth serious thought by everyone
    truely concerned about the future of our America—and our individual well being as citizens. The federal government has become an “us versus them” entity over the years and the original groundrules for its operation have been drastically violated. It will take a long time for the problem to be rectified, but we can and must take on the task if we want to survive as a viable nation.
    The first, and immediate, task is to rid our country of the blight that currently occupies the White House and to get fresh blood,conservative thinkers in the Congress. Regardless of their affiliation, anyone who has been in Congress more than six or eight years is suspect of being a member of the “brotherhood” as far as I am concerned.
    The political talking heads are discussing bho’s political future and his chances in 2012—the country cannot possibly allow him to even be on the political scene in 2012. He should be in Federal prison by then.
    First things first—this November we begin the clean-up process in Congress and when the Socialist Democrats are taken care of, we can expose and prosecute the illegal alien. Let the games begin !!!

  3. 4 RJ July 14, 2010 at 6:01 pm

    Obama says …

    Kenya My Country, Tussker My Beer !

  4. 6 Papoose July 14, 2010 at 7:38 pm

    Here’s another lie:

    White people are racists. NAACP condemns Tea Party Americans as dangerous bigots and racists. FLOTUS takes the stage bemoaning the Black People’s plight…blah, blah, blah. Hypocrite. Liar.

    Okay, if we agree that white people are racist bigots, explain to me how Barry Soetero became the unpresident of the Unites States of America. Unless, of course, you know stuff we don’t know. We are aware of all the massive election fraud tactics, but 82% worth?

    Yea, barky got voted into office all by hisself.

    Who do they think they are fooling? White people who pulled the lever for this maniac should turn their backs now.

    oh, and Black People, what did barky ever do for you? Do tell.

  5. 10 Papoose July 14, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    Here’s the face of a true segregationalist:


    Yep, a Nation within a Nation. Slavery revisited. The Masters.

  6. 11 Papoose July 14, 2010 at 8:41 pm

    CoFounder of the NAACP

    Julius Rosenwald. Please be sure to read Philanthropy

  7. 12 Papoose July 14, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    And another lie: Campaign 2008


  8. 13 Stock July 14, 2010 at 8:52 pm

    By the way, Ms. Virginia Thomas (the wife of Justice Thomas) operates a “Conservative” website “Liberty Central” which purports to uphold adherence to the Constitution, but appears to be ignoring the Constitutional ineligibility and daily violation of the Constitution by Mr. Obama. Im sure that Mr. Thomas would support adherence to all of the Articles of the Constitution unless amended-but maybe they just dont communicate.

    • 16 drkate July 14, 2010 at 11:32 pm

      Agreed, and readers, I have corrected the statement above, “First put down the Gun, and then we’ll talk” for its proper attribution to that wonderful blog, reboot the republic.

      thanks, Jericho.

  9. 17 Quantum Leap July 15, 2010 at 1:32 am

    This guy hit the nail on the head. I couldn’t have said it better myself. PUMA!

  10. 19 bill July 15, 2010 at 6:31 am

    I haven’t filled out a government form in some time,but I recall in the past that every government form always had a block that inquired to
    “race” . If the government were truly interested in stamping out discrimination,can anyone explain the necessity for this “race” block ? I can understand a “citizenship” block and a “male/female” block to discern the needs of the applicants .I suggest the government needs help in discerning what a “American Citizen” is and here is but
    a small section:

  11. 20 no-nonsense-nancy July 15, 2010 at 9:31 am

    From Yahoo news nine states have promised support of Arizona and my state, Pennsylvania is one of them! Yea!!!

    Bill, I never really gave it much thought before about asking the race of a person on applications,etc, but I can certainly see your point. On the recent census form I refused to enter my race on it. I saw no reason why they needed to know that. I only filled out the first question, how many live in my household. That’s all they need to know. I had already had a visitor, from Acorn probably, several months earlier with a hand held GPS presumably “painting” my house number as they were doing there for awhile to potential “domestic terrorists”.

    • 21 susan h July 15, 2010 at 10:42 am

      I was at the small post office near my office and suddenly realized that none of the employees were white. Not that I haven’t noticed this before, but something made me think about it in more detail than usual. Now that you are telling us you have to put “race” on government applications, it seems they might purposely not hire white people or only in small minority. Someone might say, Oh, that is a job no white person would want (not true I believe), like they say about jobs going to illegals, they are jobs no U.S. citizen would want (not necessarily true). The “race” box is a way to filter out applications of anyone but the Chosen Race for these jobs (government civil service jobs are plum jobs with good pensions and other benefits). Yet I am sure there is a “disproportionately high amount of african-americans in these jobs” than other groups. There seems to be some kind of entitlement that they should have these jobs. Now I know how and why.

      • 22 Rich T July 15, 2010 at 12:30 pm

        I worked for Defense Contracting for 4 years and saw just this example going on. if it wasn’t based on race then it was a good ole boy hook up. Never a fair & unbiased promotion. Then with a sprinkle of couldn’t fire anyone for not doing their job w/o an act of Congress….HAHA they won’t even do their job.

  12. 24 tdr July 15, 2010 at 10:40 am

    copying a blogger commented which was reposted at AGJ website:

    Clinton impeachment worked because we had majority in house. In case you are not aware, impeachment alone is not much. It a Congressional equivalent of (judicial) indictment. This can can happen with merely 51% votes in the House. Then real “trial” happens in Senate, where the ‘jury’ is the whole Senate, and it takes 2/3 majority votes to ‘convict’ the President. If that happens, he is automatically fired.

    Now currently we have a MINORITY in senate. In Nov, maximum number of seats we can logically win [still only] gives 12 less than 2/3 majority. So unless you can convince 13 democrats to convict their prodigal President, it is a lost cause. BacnMail’s idea of treason, although sounds far fetched, is MORE do-able. But military has to take action. They are the only ones, as far as I know, who can arrest and try the Commander-in-Chief for treasonous mischief. In case of conviction during wartime, there is also a provision for summarily shooting a convicted traitor.

    Those of us on the Right who are waiting for November, and 2012, it is useless. [We still need a] 2/3 rd’s majority in Senate to overturn Presidential vetoes. Can’t have it in NOV. Even if you win all the seats in play. So, no, you can’t even undo the damage, let alone stop him from doing more. He will just enact agenda through agencies, and Executive orders — and SCOTUS be damned. Who is going to enforce their decisions? The Justice Department? Look at what they did about the Court’s repeated decisions about their drilling ban. There is only one way I can see that can stop this menace — 10 million Americans flood the streets of DC, and not leave until Government meets all our demands. We don’t even need to bear arms for that. And it is perfectly Constitutional. Constitution expressly gives that right to the people.

    • 25 Helen July 15, 2010 at 11:57 am

      The last thing I want to do is get into a debate on this BUT I just need to say it.

      Back in 2005, the Dem Party played the same game on us. That is this, we Dem’s wanted impeachment hearings on the Bush cabal. Many of us followed every second of what that evil administration did to this countries entire being. We loathed, and still do, any Bush and anyone related to that administration.

      Our Party leaders fired up the base and got us to work to pounce in 2006 by winning majorities in both the House and the Senate.

      We Dem’s elected a majority b/c we wanted these criminals to go to jail, but what did the D’s do, by george, pun intended, they took impeachment off of the table b/c Bush was a lame duck Prez anyways and that the majority would be there to control him.

      Beware! The Dem’s were played in 2005, let’s make sure the R’s aren’t played in November.

      All I can say, is you have b/w now and November to get the R leadership to sign in blood and in front of the worldstage that they will impeach IF you vote for them. Do not give this opportunity away by being shortsighted or trusting. Trust with these hooligans will get none of us anywhere.

      • 26 Quantum Leap July 15, 2010 at 7:17 pm

        Oh Helen, they intend to do more than impeach if they can take control of the house.

        Just think patriots, Piglosi will be gone if R’s win the house this NOV. I can dream can’t I?

  13. 27 Rich T July 15, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    It will be interesting (or not) if this developes. I would not put it past Barry to use this to implement more of his masters plans. One last desperate grasp for Nov 2012.

    ……Just sayn’

    Just as the three days befor 9/11 there was unusual amounts of trading going on with American Airlines (goldmansucks)

    We are seeing the same type of action this time with power companies. This as Obama suporters say an act of terrorism is the only thing that will save him.

  14. 28 no-nonsense-nancy July 15, 2010 at 7:36 pm

    tdr, I agree with you wholeheartedly. We have to go to DC in the millions and refuse to leave until they are out. And we have to do it VERY soon! The only way to “fix’ this government is to turn it upside down.

    Susan, I applied for a job at our local Post Office a number of yeaars ago and was told that I didn’t get the job because they needed to give it to a hispanic woman. Even though I was a woman they needed a hispanic one.

  15. 29 Rosemary Woodhouse July 15, 2010 at 8:19 pm

    QL- Controlling the House is certainly viable.

  16. 30 Heather July 15, 2010 at 8:56 pm

    I just wonder what would happen if everyone filled that block in as either hispanic or black!

    Nothing anyone could do, who’s to say you don’t have latin or black blood in your history–no one.

    Next time I have to fill it our I will check one of those boxes just to see what they will do!

    Then I will have the goods on them for racial discrimination—and then I will just tell them that I am going to the NAACP, ACLU, RAZA and anyother racial organization I can find.

    Anybody know if there is an organization specially for white people?

    • 31 Papoose July 15, 2010 at 10:33 pm

      Anybody know if there is an organization specially for white people?

      IRS, heather. lol!

      I predict preschoolers will soon be told their is no such thing as Santa and that their parents lie to them about such things. Christmas will be scheduled for the 4th Monday in December with triple time pay for illegals delivering goods.

      Rumor has it the YMCA/ YWCA will be called “the Y”, because the word Christian is offensive to many “members”.

      FEMA awaits crackers everywhere.

  17. 32 Heather July 15, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    Papoose——-IRS LOL!! you must have read my mind!!

  18. 35 no-nonsense-nancy July 16, 2010 at 1:45 am

    You guys are too funny. That must be why I keep coming back here!

  19. 38 no-nonsense-nancy July 16, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    The EPA has now labeled milk as oil? Because it contains some animal fat which is a non-petroleum based oil! How absurd! Now there are new restrictions on dairy farmers to have leak proof milk containers. Will the price of milk go up? More control of our lives, folks.


  20. 39 no-nonsense-nancy July 16, 2010 at 3:53 pm

    Why have blacks notoriously voted democrat? this is a very good video.

  21. 40 no-nonsense-nancy July 16, 2010 at 6:28 pm

    Washington DC area hit my earthquake today measuring 3.6 on Rictor scale. Think it knocked any sense into our “legislators”?

  22. 42 Quantum Leap July 16, 2010 at 7:36 pm

    We are finding out the dirt of what’s going on. Is this why cancer has increased greatly from when I was a kid? It was practically non existent as far as I know.

    Mauro Oliveira, webmaster of said that aluminum became a concern to many after the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting when independent journalists sent shockwaves around the world after breaking the story of scientists discussing the plausibility of spraying 10 to 20 mega-tons of aluminum into the sky in SAG campaigns. Francis Mangels, a retired USDA/USFS Biologist commented on the use of aluminum by saying, “although aluminum is an abundant element, it does not exist naturally in the environment in free form. Dispersing massive amounts of ultra-fine aluminum particulates as proposed by geo-engineers into the stratosphere would have unquantifiable human health and environmental impacts”. When scientists were asked about the risks associated with the use of aluminum sprayed as an aerosol in SAG programs, they admitted that they have only begun to research aluminum and have published nothing. They also admitted that something terrible could be found in the future that they don’t know about. Also, when asked about deployment of current programs, scientists denied that any SAG programs have been deployed. This contradicted the findings of many who claim that SAG programs are well under-way and that high amounts of aluminum and other harmful substances from these programs are being found resulting in the devastation of eco-systems and the health of people around the world.

    Read More Here >

  23. 43 Quantum Leap July 16, 2010 at 7:48 pm

    I mean for the life of me, how is it that they are acting as if this is pre-civil rights? How is it that they keep scape-goating Caucasians for thier self-made personal problems. Weren’t we progressing before this bunch of loons came on the scene? They live in an altered reality that is false.

    • 44 jane July 16, 2010 at 9:48 pm

      especially since Whites are the true true victims of racial discrimination in the USA

      Black on White violence is 1,000+ times the reverse!!

  24. 46 no-nonsense-nancy July 16, 2010 at 8:30 pm

    Didn’t mean “my” earthquake, meant “mild” one. Although the thought of causing an earthquale to knock some sense into them isn’t all that bad of an idea!

  25. 47 jane July 16, 2010 at 9:45 pm

    Donald Young’s Mom has vindicated Larry Sinclair’s testimony that Donald Young was murdered because he was Obama’s lover.

  26. 48 jane July 16, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    Obama proven 82% more efficient at getting US troops killed than was Bush in Afnamistan.

  27. 49 jane July 16, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    Lenin’s Little Potatoes

  28. 52 Michelle July 18, 2010 at 8:53 am
    Each member of the House of Representatives will constructively forfeit the privilege of reelection by failing to introduce a Resolution of Impeachment before the November 2010 election. That is the only mechanism through which we can examine Mr. Obama’s role in the criminal conspiracy of fraud that got state election officials to print on the ballot the name of the candidate who overwhelming circumstantial evidence establishes is Constitutionally unqualified for the job. And, assuming the focused investigation and trial by the Senate validates our findings then, under the Constitution, Impeachment is the only way to remove him from office.
    Including Madam Speaker, who refuses to respond to voters’ questions as to what was the documentary basis for swearing in that signed Certification of his Nomination that he is a natural born citizen.

  1. 1 Truth and Consequences « drkatesview Trackback on July 30, 2010 at 1:56 am
  2. 2 Nullification « drkatesview Trackback on August 22, 2010 at 2:38 am
Comments are currently closed.

July 2010
« Jun   Aug »

Recent Comments

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: