Poster from TheBirtherReport.com
The effort to bring attention to a legitimate constitutional question of Presidential eligibility has been fraught with unbelievable distractions, ridiculous denials even from so-called ‘patriots’, and cold stone silence from the judicary, Congress, our friends and family. The intent is to make us feel like we are isolated and crazy. We see the sheet of rain that engulfs us; no one else apparently can. We are told to move on, as there is nothing to see there.
It has almost worked. Almost.
Like a child asking to be caught, Obama has raised the issue once again by whining of the ‘lies’ about his background. Asked about his faith, he responded with complaints about his birth certificate. Surely this is a ploy to foster the image of a beleaguered pResident, but again refocuses the concern to the ‘birth certificate’, not his actual citizenship. He is trying, through his own reverse pressure, to get the general public to accept the forged certification of live birth as ‘proof’ of his citizenship.
In a twisted way, his lying both about his faith and his background are diversions that work off each other. When we question his citizenship, he turns it into a question of his faith. He deflects questions about his muslim faith to the birth certificate. There is no surprise here….except, that he is running out of plausible deniability.
This kind of distraction will do him more harm than good, as even the most “eligibility” unaware and uninterested people will say, “huh? I asked you about your faith, not your birth certificate…” :shock: 😀
Turning the Tables on Distraction
It is interesting that the intentional distraction of and focus on the ‘birth certificate’ was used to “dumb down” the concept of natural born citizen to that of ‘born in the USA’. This was forced on the public by ignoring the issue, then constant ridicule, and then the name calling and race baiting.
If we look in another direction, we can realize that Obama is a dual citizen, has admitted so, and now the State Department has confirmed it. With this admission, it becomes possible to ask this question:
Can a dual citizen be President?
Rather than this one:
Where is your birth certificate?
Now the only reason we need the birth certificate is to ascertain whether he has any American citizenship in him at all. If he was born abroad, he has no American citizenship because his mother was too young to pass it on. If he was born in the United States, then at least we know the ‘other’ part of his dual citizenship is American.
Asking this question instead of the Birth Certificate question makes all the difference in the world, as it removes the distraction of arguing over a COLB, an electronic image, the forgery, and whether a COLB is ‘sufficient’. It provides a question that anyone can ask without immediately being labeled a birther. And we still need the BC to ascertain whether Obama is American or simply a foreigner hiding in the White House.
With regard to dual citizenship and the Presidency, the only information written on that subject is contained in the superb documentation of the Kerchner v. Obama case. That historic information indicates clearly that divided loyalties are not accepted for the position of President. If the courts or Congress are to look for guidance, this is where they will land. Thank you, Commander Kerchner and Attorney Apuzzo.
We know he is British, Kenyan, and most likely Indonesian. Now he’d better show his papers as we don’t know if he is American.
We are at a crossroads, and everyone is telling us what to think. For me, this is THE defining issue of this moment–nothing else can be done to right the wrong direction of this country without outing and removing the usurper.
I am not backing down.