The advance scouting for the Usurpathon–the marathon to remove the usurper and his enablers from the White House–truly was a success on many fronts. Our major advance is learning how to speak with people about the issue of Obama’s dual citizenship and his lack of eligibility for office. A surprise for all engaged was that a large crowd is not necessary to make an effective point. As our very own No Nonsense Nancy states so succinctly:
We were never trying to get a big number of participants. That would have made our accomplishment impossible. We were able to convey our message and reach people just fine with the number we had. You should all do what we did, if in your own cities or towns. WE were able to figure out the best approach and the right response to the passers by. We reached an awful lot of people in just 3 days. Large crowds are good at times but we proved that you can accomplish more by having a small group. They can be organized quickly anywhere. The signage and the message is the key. Make your goals and stick to them. Don’t be afraid to take a little bit of ridicule or name calling. You would be surprised how many people support you and agree with you. Education is the main goal.So many people are not aware of his dual citizenship or the dangers of that. Once they are educated they will want to act on it. How do you think the word was spread on issues before we had our modern means of communication?
The deal with permits for demonstrating in D.C. is courtesy to law enforcement. Any more than three people and a permit should be requested. So we planned for many, but intended our crew to be small. As a result, we had many people come right up, take photographs, and ask, “what is this about”? One Japanese family was shocked, took photos, and the older gentleman accompanying them walked away clapping, signifying approval.
Others walked by shaking their heads with disgust, or laughing, or saying ‘get over it’, or ‘he was born in Hawaii’. That just proves what the intended effect of Obama’s strategy was: to make it about “sore losers” (democracy, or mob rule) and ‘born in the USA’…all the while lowering the standard for acceptance of a President: an electronic COLB; celebrity status; oratory/hypnotism and promises of change. Those who came to engage were genuinely interested, and, were drawn into conversation. Ever taken the tact of ‘full blooded American’?
The name callers were few; and the youth seem to me 100% unengaged. Our gathering spot was a great big tree, to which many were attracted to rest in the shade…it averaged in the mid-90’s while we were there. Location. Location. Location. Think about a non-threatening small group of people, with signage that draws you in because it begs some kind of question, standing under a tree, offering respite. Discussions, not yelling, are possible.
We also are finding how much the obots are scared of this effort, as while we were performing dedicated works, they were posing as tourists (lol, but obvious, I mean, what IS it with the business shoes and shorts? :razz:), taking pictures. But imagine having to stoop to a strategy of photographs and mockery…it shows how desperate they are. Remember that, they have no arguments, they have to yell and mock. Yawn. Classic Alinsky.
The space provided by our presence at the Capitol also allowed our visits to specific Congressman, once again in pursuit of our mission. From a hand-delivered letter to and discussion with members,
As I am not a constituent of your district, I am writing to you in your capacity as both Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee and as a member of the House Judiciary Committee. Your committee memberships, coupled with your strong support of the Constitution, compel me to bring certain information before your eyes.
…two years ago, I would not have imagined writing any letters to any congressmen. What began as standard investigation of candidates for the 2008 election unearthed information so alarming that I have spent the last two years trying to bring the light of investigation on the people and events that were involved. I believe the traditional remedies have been exhausted and now appeal to your duty to the Constitution, and the committees you sit upon…
I am sure you are familiar with the adage, ‘all that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing’. For the benefit of the people in, and the States of our Republic, I implore you to review this matter and the attached materials, and take action in whatever way you can on behalf of our Country. I am attaching documents as I believe that most elected representatives may not have the entire evidence trail laid out in front of them.
Condensing two years of research, I have settled upon two questions that capture the essence of the concern I bring to you today:
- Does the Constitution permit a dual citizen to serve as President of the United States?
- Was election fraud committed in 2008 to avoid any true investigation of this question?
It appeared to me to be genuine surprise at and interest in “dual citizenship”…followed up quickly by our platoon reminding that the State Department had already confirmed Obama was a dual citizen. I remember one staffer bursting out saying, “Obama is a Brit??!!!” Correct, I said, in all seriousness, he is not legit.
Dang, left that bumper sticker in the cab… 😀
Regrettably, the controversy over Mr. Obama’s ‘birth certificate’ has obscured the very real, constitutional question as to whether a dual citizen is permitted to be President of the United States. In Dreams of My Father, and on his 2008 campaign website, Mr. Obama freely admits that his father was Kenyan and never a U.S. citizen. He explains that his citizenship at birth was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948, therefore, at best, Mr. Obama is British/Kenyan and American, a dual citizen. I learned in my research that while Kenyan citizenship has to be affirmatively declared by the age of 21, the British citizenship does not expire. Thus it would appear that Mr. Obama is British.
The only reason to see a Birth Certificate is to ascertain whether Mr. Obama has any American citizenship; he either inherited his mother’s U.S. citizenship (if born in US), or he did not (if born outside US) because of his mother’s age. Unfortunately it is not possible to assess his American citizenship as Mr. Obama has failed to prove conclusively that he was born in the United States.
Reaffirming my understanding of the term ‘natural born citizen’, used only once in the Constitution and with reference to the President only, I learned that those words were chosen with specificity and intent by the Founders to assure the President’s singular allegiance to the United States.
“The natives, or natural born citizens, are born of the country to parents who are citizens.”
At once then I had to find out whether the Constitution had been amended or case law had altered this meaning as I have understood it for nearly 50 years. Aided by many others who were researching the same question, neither the Fourteenth Amendment, nor Supreme Court case law, nor amendment of the Constitution, has changed the definition of ‘natural born citizen’. An Article II “natural born citizen” is not the same thing as a Fourteenth Amendment “citizen of the United States”.
Thus I return to my original question: does the Constitution permit a dual citizen to serve as President? My rudimentary research suggests no, however, I believe that this question could be answered by Congress, with guidance from the Court on definitions, in order to assure Americans, and the world, that our government is led by a constitutionally eligible individual.
The Supreme Court
The Constitutional heroes celebrated here stand for the rule of law and the Constitution to the point of getting to this Court. Soon they will be asked to address this head-on rather than laughing about avoiding a constitutional issue that puts our nation at great risk. And how interesting that Obama has his two spies inside the Supreme Court –with no authority to do this whatsoever–in Kagan and Sotomayor.
The infiltration is deep, and courage is in short supply.
We are tethered to our jobs facing assaults against all of the institutions in our society that have culminated in the usurpation by Obama.
It is long past time for our works to begin.
The White House
You also must know the satisfaction of standing in front of the White House, on the steps of the usurper, with the charge to arrest the criminals. Securing a permit for the sidewalk, like everyone else the National Park Service officers were there to secure everyone’s safety. Once again, respectfully passing through crowds and not interfering with pictures, I saw some mouths drop open, begging the question, who are the criminals, and then the discussion and opportunity to educate.
Its hard to miss the point here. We have no idea who this foreigner is in the White House, who has never conclusively proven if he was born in the United States. And then to complain about having to wear his so-called birth certificate on his forehead is just ludicrous. Dude: did you read the stuff on the bottom part of the document? Or do you have one? Hey, put it on your forehead then, prove us wrong, prove us the fools. Some of us are willing to wear theirs on their forehead in public, how about you?
Getting the American public to accept a forged, electronic certification of live birth as a standard for the Commander in Chief of our Armed forces has put our entire country at risk. The most hostile people told us ‘he was born in Hawaii, so shut up!!’ No one is safe with Obama in the White House, who stood today and outright lied (practiced Taqiyya) about the “mask” at ground zero. He masks his true intent in the language of our constitution, openly mocking us every day. And the press corps says nothing which is the worst part of it. And Biden, the idiot, telling the troops that in the Constitution, he has two roles: breaking the tie in the Senate, and serving hot dogs to Wounded Warriors. Check out the direct mockery of the Constitution and we laugh? The Wounded Warriors in this picture did not laugh at that statement. Arrest the criminals.
Meanwhile, back at the house:
Was Election Fraud Committed in 2008 to Prevent Consideration of this Question?
During the summer of 2008, inquiries regarding Mr. Obama’s citizenship went unanswered or ridiculed, and no one addressed either the question of his dual citizenship nor birth location. There was neither an affirmation that a dual citizen could serve as President, nor a denial. Yet, Mr. Obama’s name appeared on the ballot in all 50 states, having been ‘officially nominated’ at the Democratic National Convention.
In Arizona, Mr. Obama himself had to certify that he was a ‘natural born citizen’ and constitutionally qualified to have his name put on the ballot. In four other States, the signing official—Nancy Pelosi—had to certify under oath that the nominee met the Constitutional qualifications for the office. The official nomination document of the Democratic Party also had to certify that the candidate met the constitutional qualifications to serve as President. As Chair of the Democratic National Convention, Nancy Pelosi was the certifying official.
In August 2008, when Mr. Obama was nominated, the only information that existed about him was that he was a dual citizen—of British/Kenyan and American descent— and that he had also been adopted by an Indonesian national. Because the question of dual citizenship and the Presidency had not been resolved, I fail to see how Nancy Pelosi could legally certify, under penalty of perjury, that Mr. Obama was constitutionally qualified for the Presidency. What was the documented proof? Unfortunately, she has denied every request for that information.
Mr. Obama’s name went on the ballot, and he was confirmed by the Electoral College. Questions regarding Mr. Obama’s dual citizenship continued to be ignored during this time. On January 8, 2009, Congress—under the leadership of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi—had an opportunity to address the question of dual citizenship through objections on the floor of the Joint Session prior to confirming the Electoral College Vote. Speaker Pelosi disallowed any questions, orchestrating the swift confirmation of Mr. Obama without any scrutiny.
Nancy Pelosi’s position as both Speaker of the House and Chair of the Democratic National Convention virtually assured that the legitimate constitutional question of dual citizenship and the Presidency would not be addressed by Congress, Mr. Obama, the Democratic National Committee, members of Congress, and the Democrat Party. As a result, Americans were deprived of critical information in the 2008 election, and the states may have been deprived of a constitutionally legitimate candidate.
My alarm is that for the first time in our history, we have allowed a dual citizen to serve as President without a clear constitutional rationale, mandate, or amendment to do so. Obfuscation and obstruction of information seems to prevail rather than shine a light on this imperative constitutional question.
I believe that men and women of good faith and character, who are true to their oath to uphold the Constitution, will recognize the danger in not resolving these questions, and seize this moment to assure the integrity of the United States of America. I trust that you are one of those men who will find a way to answer these questions.
Lt. Colonel Terry Lakin
WE began our mission with the intent of honoring Constitutional heroes, the ones who are standing for Americans in their absolute oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic…and the names are rolling off our lips as they will forever now over the dinner table. Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, Commander Charles Kerchner, Commander Walter Fitzpatrick, in the presence of all who have served in all the wars.
We learned that no one knows about LTC–not at Walter Reed, not in Congress, not on the street. He is being isolated by the military, Obama, and the media with intent. No one knows that on September 3, 2010, a man with 17 years of service was denied his right to defend himself with evidence because it would be embarrassing to the pResident. Even in intentional actions to create a mistrial and not deal with it (the taser remark; Judge Lind’s decision), and attempt to claim that the Pentagon and not Obama were the originator of the deployment orders which LTC has refused, Obama is attempting to break the military chain of command, which would allow Lind to issue such a non-sensible, unconstitutional, and likely illegal ruling. Her ruling clearly creates reversible error, a sloppy, intentional violation of her oath to protect and defend the Constitution, and LTC Lakin’s defense.
The military wants Congress to deal with it; Congress wants the judiciary to deal with it; and the judiciary either doesn’t care or wants anyone but them to have to deal with it. We are talking not only about one man’s life, but our lives, and if he goes down, it will be because no one knows about this.
It is imperative that Patriots act now to write their Senators and Congressmen with one question: how is it that an LTC can be denied his defense in the case of Obama’s eligibility? Make them know about this case before Obama is able to escape this direct challenge to his status as CIC.
A gift to the Platoon was breaking bread with Lt. Col. Lakin himself. An informal meeting that was not about legal strategy, afforded us the opportunity to thank him for ourselves and the many who came with us in intention and prayer. What I can tell you is that this man is not a risk-taker, and would not undertake this action lightly. He is putting his life and family on the line directly on behalf of our Nation, and our families. He has our backs.
Should we not have his?
Lessons from the First Phase of the Usurpathon
We face the invasion and take over of our country by forces that have long-sought to enslave us. And it is now…no event is unconnected to this very plan. It is not ‘coming’, the invasion is here. The longer we allow this to stand the longer this will become acceptable.
Start now, do not stop. This IS a marathon.
It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.