A Test for the Supremes

©2010 drkate

This case is about whether our nation should allow a precedent created by a popular vote to stand that makes it possible for an individual who is born with dual and conflicting foreign allegiance to become President and Commander-in-Chief of the Military.  This case is about whether we should allow a critical question such as the meaning of a ‘natural born Citizen’ to be answered by the political parties and the people through their act of voting at the polls, or by the judicial branch of government…

On September 30 2010, a petition to the Supreme Court asking them to grant a Writ of Certiorari in the Kerchner v. Obama and Congress lawsuit was filed by Attorney Apuzzo for Commander Kerchner.  Painstakingly shepherding this case through the proper legal procedures for more than twenty (20) months, without legal error or misstep,  Commander Kerchner’s  case is finally ripe for judicial review.

The petition delineates in considerable detail the reasons why the Supreme Court should take the case, offering a slightly different perspective on the excellent pleadings that have characterized Kerchner’s effort since January 2009.

Kerchner argues that because the lower courts have dismissed the case without ever considering the underlying merits and facts,  they have in fact decided important matters of federal and constitutional law that can only be settled by the Supreme Court.

Noting that the facts in Kerchner’s filings  have never been disputed throughout the proceedings,  Attorney Apuzzo points out that by law Kerchner’s  arguments  legally must be accepted as true.  Recall that the only ‘defense’ Obama put up was to invent a strawman case to argue about standing and jurisdiction–thus there is no substantive legal argument refute any of the allegations made in the Kerchner lawsuit.  The Obama ‘defense’ is an empty suit, just like the man-child himself.

National Security of the United States

Of the many fine arguments in this petition, I will focus on the national security argument for Attorney Apuzzo has deftly linked the case of LTC Terrence Lakin to the necessity of the Supreme Court’s review.

Petitioners’ claims involve the national security of the United States which is now vitally at risk.  Because both the District Court and the Court of Appeals found that petitioners do not have Article III standing, those courts never decided the underlying merits of petitioners case.

Citing the lower Courts’ refusal to address the merits of the case, and its frivolous recommendation that Kerchner seek a legislative or political solution, the filings delineate that the case is

about whether we should allow a critical question such as the meaning of a ‘natural born Citizen’ to be answered by the political parties and the people through their act of voting at the polls, or by the judicial branch of government

and that

The answer to this question has direct implication not only for the protection of life, liberty, and property…but also for the national security of the United States…for who is allowed to wield the all and singular powers of the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Military is of vital importance to the preservation and survival of the constitutional republic…

Delineating once again the Framers intent, and citing John Jay and other historic information, the petition asserts that the reason for a ‘natural born Citizen’ as President was to provide a ‘strong check” on foreign influence making its way into our government and specifically in the Office of the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Military.

If the President and Commander-in-Chief is ineligible for those offices, both our civilian and military sectors need to know that as soon as possible. Whether he is legitimate is also vital in maintaining the proper chain of command in our military and in giving legality to all military orders that emanate from him.

Kerchner asks the Court

to take judicial notice of an affidavit filed by Lt. General Thomas G. McInerney in the court-martial proceeding of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin who is currently in court-martial proceedings for his refusal to obey orders …on the grounds that Obama has yet to show that he is a ‘natural born Citizen’.

I am grateful to Commander Kerchner for inclusion of the Terry Lakin case in these filings, as it will help bring high level attention to this case of a soldier simply trying to honor his oath to protect and defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Some Final Surprises

The filings contain some additional reasons for the Supreme Court to grant the writ of certiorari, underscoring the extremely important and urgent need to address the issue of Obama’s eligibility:

  • The impact of an ineligible President on the legitimacy and integrity of U.S. foreign policy;
  • The need for the Court to take the case to maintain the proper balance of power among the branches of government;
  • The need to protect the rule of law
  • In the context of non-citizen permanent residence in the U.S., the number of illegal aliens, and the number of children in the United States born to alien (one or two) parents, the Nation needs a definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ for future presidential and vice presidential elections.

And the best surprise of all?  Try this:

We respectfully request that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 455 (a) and (b), Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan should recuse themselves from having any involvement or deciding any issues in petitioners’ petition to the Supreme Court in which they are challenging the legitimacy of the putative President Obama, the government official who appointed them to their offices.  The validity of their appointments can be questioned should Mr. Obama be found not eligible to be President which could cause them to lose their appointment in which they have a financial interest.

😆

Stay tuned.  This is the hour we have been waiting for, as all of our other efforts are beginning to culminate in a massive push to expose and remove the usurper.  The outcome of this case, and the LTC Lakin court-martial, will be signals for our next steps.

75 Responses to “A Test for the Supremes”


  1. 1 Jan October 1, 2010 at 2:22 am

    Let’s pray that the Supremes will do what is right and just.
    I’m so glad they included LTC Lakin and the part about reclusing Kagan and Sotomayer.
    Wonder how long it will take the Court to arrive at a decision?
    The fate of our Country hangs by a thread.

  2. 2 o Berg October 1, 2010 at 2:36 am

    Soldier on Commander, the people of the United States Republic are with you–God Speed.

    o. Berg

  3. 3 The Arizona Patriot October 1, 2010 at 2:45 am

    When this goes nowhere like the other 400 cases, this is why:

    Congress established the Superior Court of the District of Columbia as the trial court of general jurisdiction for the District of Columbia in 1970. The court consists of a chief judge and 61 associate judges. The court is assisted by the service of 24 magistrate judges as well as retired judges who have been recommended and approved as senior judges.

    The Superior Court handles all local trial matters, including civil, criminal, family court, probate, tax, landlord-tenant, small claims, and traffic. The Superior Court is here to serve the community, and several initiatives and collaborative projects are underway to improve service to the public in our Nation’s Capital.

    • 4 drkate October 1, 2010 at 10:11 am

      Respectfully disagree. Article III jurisdiction places this firmly in the supreme court’s court…

      this is a constitutional issue, not covered by the Superior court.

  4. 5 no-nonsense-nancy October 1, 2010 at 8:56 am

    i think we have to stay positive and not give up hope. Thank you, Dr. Kate for posting this and for your fine commentary as usual. My thanks go out to all of those who are working so hard to save our country ffom this terrible usurpation.

    GOD BLESS AMERICA.

    STOP THEM COLD!!

  5. 7 Noway2no October 1, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    I believe in God’s ultimate control so the (really) big picture is looking good.

    However the charade that Roberts colluded in during the alleged swearing in and the unprecedented meeting with Barry by the Supremes before the inauguration gives me big pause regarding the court’s honor and commitment to our republic over political zeitgeist.

    Prayer. Prayer.

    • 9 Noway2no October 1, 2010 at 4:21 pm

      I have read that all before. I understand the mechanics of the usurpation. We are looking at a conspiracy of a worldwide magnitude.

      But, where was the birth of this scheme. Who knew enough to put it all together? A few people must have been orchestrating it. I realize that many people who actively enabled this crime, even maybe Hillary, were just swept up by events and may have felt that (or have been threatened into compliance) they were powerless to stop this “historic event”.

      We are going to need generations to clean up this mess.

    • 10 Quantum Leap October 1, 2010 at 9:55 pm

      No worries. The rats are jumping ship to avoid the lawsuits coming.
      30 days to a new congress.

  6. 11 Colony14Author October 1, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    Few would disagree that Kerchner v. Obama is one of the most significant cases ever to be hear by the Supreme Court—assuming the Court has the courage to accept it and issue a ruling. Interpreting what the Founding Fathers meant by the term “natural born citizen” clearly makes Kerchner v Obama the type of case that Supreme Court Justices “live for.” It will be the most significant ruling of their careers and be of monumental importance—in no small part because of the growing population of immigrants in the United States. As Mr. Apuzzo notes, it is important for future elections that all citizens understand the requirements of the presidency.

    Obama was elected because the vast majority of voters do not understand the term “natural born citizen” and because they assumed that the politicians know, understand, and follow the U.S. Constitution. They were wrong—and the error should be corrected.

    There can be no doubt that the Supreme Court Justices fully understand the consequences of ruling against Obama. They know that declaring him an illegal president who must be removed from office will, at the very least, create mountains of legal issues relating to every official document he signed since being sworn in on January 20, 2009. A ruling against Obama could easily leave to social unrest and nationwide riots in which hundreds—or even thousands—are killed. The Justices will certainly be aware of that possibility.

    Nevertheless, they must rule according to the law, the arguably clear intentions of the men who drafted the Constitution, and the historical documents upon which they relied when creating the law of the land. I believes that the Court will have no choice but to rule against Obama.

    The alternative—either ruling in favor of Obama or simply refusing to review the case—would be to render the U.S. Constitution meaningless and irrelevant.

    My prayers are with Commander Kerchner, Mr. Apuzzo, and the United States of America.

    Don Fredrick
    Author, The Obama Timeline
    http://www.colony14.net

    • 12 Quantum Leap October 1, 2010 at 9:29 pm

      scuse me.

      “A ruling against Obama could easily leave to social unrest and nationwide riots in which hundreds—or even thousands—are killed.”

      This statement is just more of the same progressive/fascist meme. It won’t happen. Not only does everyone KNOW he is an illegal usurper BUT they will act like kids caught with thier fingers in a cookie jar and more. 30% of the blacks now belong to the Tea Party.

  7. 13 Myron October 1, 2010 at 5:58 pm

    Aside from losing badly at every level and nearly getting sanctioned, Apuzzo was flawless in his handling of this case. Well done, sir.

  8. 15 workingclass artist October 1, 2010 at 7:12 pm

    THE TRUTH Will Out….

  9. 16 song October 1, 2010 at 7:41 pm

    No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

    Hi Dr. Kate.
    Mario doesn’t need natural born defined because the founders clarified that Citizen(anything other than natural born) could only be President if they were a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. They were quite clear about this actually. A dual citizen is what those who qualified at that time were. So Obama missed that deadline by over 200 years. It is quite clear actually. Obama is a perfect textbook example of who wouldn’t qualify–

    No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;

  10. 17 Quantum Leap October 1, 2010 at 9:09 pm

    This is the midnight hour indeed in many ways drkate.

    Rahm’s gone: New day, new tone for the White House
    Considered the most consuming and influential staff job in American politics, the chief of staff shapes nearly everything at the White House — how the president spends his time, how he pursues his strategies on foreign and domestic policy, how he deals with a politically deadlocked Congress and a skeptical electorate.
    Buh Bye creep 😐
    Check out the closets cases in loving man to man embrace with eyes shut and excstacy on thier faces.😀 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_chief_of_staff;_ylt=AjfDg3sE.VO4wcfVMrSA6PBH2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTM1NTBkZ3R0BGFzc2V0Ay9zL2FwL3VzX29iYW1hX2NoaWVmX29mX3N0YWZmBGNjb2RlA21wX2VjXzhfMTAEY3BvcwMyBHBvcwMyBHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbGsDcmFobXNnb25lbmV3

    Feds try to save law punishing military phonies
    DENVER – The U.S. Justice Department will appeal two court decisions that said a federal law making it illegal to lie about being a war hero is unconstitutional.
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101001/ap_on_re_us/us_military_medals_impostors
    Now if they’d only create similiar laws like claiming you are a grower/rancher/farmer when you are not and making claims for USDA FSA Funds.

    And..drum roll
    Hillary had the awful honors of apologizing to Guatemalans for secret STD experiments that occured from 1946 to 1948.
    “Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research could have occurred under the guise of public health,” said Clinton and Sebelius in a joint statement. “We deeply regret that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were affected by such abhorrent research practices.”
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20101001/hl_yblog_upshot/u-s-apologizes-to-guatemalans-for-secret-std-experiments

    Soon to be released news—>Kerchner wins over the Mack Daddy😆

  11. 18 Quantum Leap October 1, 2010 at 9:58 pm

    Is anything being done to get rid of DOJ Eric Holder? He is as crooked as they come and is not upholding the law. He is intentionally incompetent and purposefully not doing his job. HE NEEDS TO GO NOW!

    • 19 drkate October 1, 2010 at 10:02 pm

      I think the New Black Panther case, and republican investigations even before January will make it necessary for him to quit.

      Good riddance…terrorist sympathizer! 😡

  12. 20 Quantum Leap October 1, 2010 at 10:26 pm

    Good. I was feeling left hanging with all the rats scattering to avoid prosecution except him. Now if Elizabeth Warren is allowed to do her freakin job and turn on the lights the roaches will scatter too.➡

  13. 21 Troy October 1, 2010 at 10:45 pm

    Here is proof that Great Britian is completely gone….There is nothing left to save….If you are a normal human being and you live in England – get the hell out – get out as fast as you can….Your country has been taken over by a bunch of imbeciles.

    Run!…Run Forrest, run!!!

  14. 22 Troy October 1, 2010 at 10:46 pm

    Enviro-film depicts exploding children
    ‘Eco-crazy’ warns: Cut your carbon or die
    ——————————————————————————–
    Posted: October 01, 2010
    9:30 pm Eastern

    By Drew Zahn
    © 2010 WorldNetDaily

    An environmental group based in the United Kingdom has taken global climate change crusader Al Gore’s name literally, creating a short film that has shocked and offended viewers with exorbitant levels of blood and, well, … gore.

    The mini-movie, produced by the 10:10 campaign, is called “No Pressure.” But as the video clearly shows, children and coworkers who don’t subscribe to the organization’s plan to cut carbon emissions are subjected to the fiercest form of peer pressure: death by bombing.

    “Those of you planning [a carbon-cutting measure] here or at home should probably get working on it,” the video says.

    “Those of you who aren’t …” the film intones meaningfully, right before blowing the climate-change skeptics to smithereens.

    Editor’s note: The following video contains gruesome levels of violence and gore, including schoolchildren exploding:

    (Story continues below)
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=210617

    • 24 drkate October 2, 2010 at 9:03 am

      This is the proper thing for the military vets and others to do, demand a fair trial and put the focus on the military, not Lakin’s defense.

      Glad also to read that he agrees that the supreme court is the place to determine the meaning of ‘nbc’…

      We need prayers that the Supreme Court will take this case. If they do not, all bets are off as we the people have taken every possible legal route to resolving this issue.

  15. 28 Papoose October 2, 2010 at 1:41 am

    (LTC) Dr.Terry Lakin * has taken a stand to say, What? Really? Show me.

    He is solely laying in the middle of the tracks for our needless worry of Confidence. ?Why? The mack truck is coming. (Yo barky!)

    He’s our personal National Security Guard. On Duty for Old Glory. You and me.

    Americans of all stripes and stars should get in touch with this American Patriot Hero. No matter who you are or where you are from…your Nation and your future liberty and well being depend on it.

    – It, being the Constitution, for posterity, forever.

    The WORLD money changers wouldn’t want a bunch of a lot of Little Americas all THROUGHOUT the World. Now would they?

    Thank you, * TL, my friend and defender.
    You are the Best.

  16. 29 Quantum Leap October 2, 2010 at 3:19 am

    Skookum’s got it going on over at flopping aces. What a read.
    Another Friday packed with sequals to this nightmare.

    America’s Half-White President Plays His Race Card
    The Dream Has Turned Into A Nightmare

    http://www.floppingaces.net/2010/10/01/americas-half-white-president-plays-his-race-card/

    • 30 Paula October 2, 2010 at 8:19 am

      A quote from Obama in the above-linked article:

      “it pained me to have to make the decision I did. Having said that, he showed bad judgment. When I put somebody in charge of the lives of 100,000 young men and women in a very hazardous situation, they’ve got to conduct themselves at the highest standards, and he (Gen. McCrystal) didn’t meet those standards.”

      Well, I thought, according to Judge Lind, that the Pentagon gives the orders, but Obama just said that he put (gave the order) McCrystal in charge. I don’t know how all of that works with the CIC, Pentagon, military, etc., so my question is does the President handpick Generals, as he said in the above quote? Does the CIC hire and fire Generals, and the Pentagon gives orders that do not originate from the CIC? I’m having trouble understanding Judge Lind’s ruling on LTC Lakin missing orders given by the Pentagon. Do they not ultimately have to come from the CIC?

      • 31 drkate October 2, 2010 at 9:08 am

        They do, Paula. Judge lind is so far off base in her ruling it makes me think that they are trying to throw the case intentionally.

        But the goal of obama is to break the chain of command…

  17. 32 Rich T October 2, 2010 at 7:35 am

    OT- Don’t know if anyone has seen this on the new global-alarmism out sharia kingdom (UK).

    It’s their 10:10 program and they eliminate the 10% of people who don’t want to “get on board”, including school children.

    Be warned that this vieo is fraphic and disurbing, but shows their true colors.

    • 33 Rich T October 2, 2010 at 8:53 am

      while reading on another blog that had a posting of this video, he came up with these points that are the truefeelings of the producer.

      1. This is what the left really thinks of you and your children.
      2. You could replace environmentalism with any golden calf that the left worships and the sentiment and their reaction would be the same.
      3. Due process is clearly irrelevant.
      4. Discussion is not allowed.
      5. Debate is not allowed.
      6. Dissent is not allowed.
      7. Disagreement is not allowed.
      8. Since those who disagreed were instantly blown away, they clearly have no rights according to the filmmaker.
      9. Those who are left standing have no rights either. The difference is that those others died free.
      10. Submission is the only “option” acceptable to liberals. Kind of like the religion of peace-no wonder they’re so closely wrapped.
      11. This video expresses the fondest wish of the left, to instantly and permanently put their boot on the neck of humanity-forever.
      12. Note that the remains of those exploded are splattered all over the “innocent” who chose correctly. This is also part of the message. Kill dissent, terrorize the rest to maintain obedience through fear.

      Can anyone name any other group, organization, religion, etc that fits these points…..

      You guessed correctly——islam

  18. 34 Rich T October 2, 2010 at 7:56 am

    For your viewing pleasure.

  19. 35 Rich T October 2, 2010 at 7:59 am

    Picked this up at WPOTUS.

    It seems that an Indonesian newspaper in 2007 called Barry by his REAL name. Once the english translation was done on the article, 10 min later it was gone. More tax $ at work there in Barry’s legal defense.

    http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/09/30/headline-u-s-presidential-candidate-barry-soetoro-%e2%80%93%c2%a02007/#more-5332

    This is a screen shot of the article in an Indonesian newspaper. It was originally written in Indonesian, and was translated into English. It was an interesting headline, so I had a desire to read and share it with our readers. I finished entering the translated information as a comment on our blog, and was checking the link to the article. Upon clicking the link, Surprise, surprise the article was gone! This happened within perhaps 10 minutes! Why would Google bots be watching Indonesian websites? Or did the author scrub it? Following is the translation; it isn’t a real exciting read.

    The important part of this is that Indonesians acknowledge that Obama’s name was Barry Soetoro and his name was changed to Barack Obama!

  20. 37 Rich T October 2, 2010 at 8:21 am

    http://www.kerodin.com/

    American Revolution III
    by Hellesponte & Kerodin
    October 1, 2010
    There have been two American Revolutionary Wars.

    In the first, Liberty won the field and our Constitution was set in place. Innate Liberties of Man were recognized as inviolate. In the second, Mr. Lincoln and Slavery won the field, dismissing the Constitution as the true framework for governance in the republic. Subjugation of the entire population was now the operating principle of Government.

    Of course, the Constitutional ideals as set forth by Jefferson and Madison were under assault before the ink was dry. Just eleven years after Rhode Island signed off, Marbury vs. Madison was ground taken by those who would be our Masters in their unending war to be rid of the limits imposed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

    Today the republic is well into our third genuine revolution. At this moment it is a Cold War, though the temperature is at that place just a single moment before the pot boils.

    The forces at odds today in America lead one to the conclusion that the American Revolution III will, through the lens of historical review, place Lincoln’s war upon the States in the league of a lively debate at a ladies social. In the history of wars that have seen Countrymen fighting one another, American Revolution III is destined to be epic.

    The lines of conflict are starkly evident: Those who believe that personal Liberty is the natural right of Man, and those who believe that the individual must yield to the power of the Collective. For convenience, we label the sides as Left and Right.

    Americans at either end of the political spectrum have self-identified to which philosophy they ascribe. There are still masses in the middle who have yet to consciously take a side. Many remain confused, though all have their pre-dispositions. Many avoid taking any decisive position, hoping it will all just go away and that Nirvana will befall us all. Every day, more and more Americans are forced to abandon the uncertainty of the middle and take their place in one group or another.

    The economy is the driving force that will lead America to blows. The final economic bubble is being inflated as the Fed pumps useless paper to those forces who buy stocks, leading to the oxymoron of an expanding stock market while most other economic indicators fall or remain suppressed. When this final bubble bursts, a spiraling economic crash will be unavoidable, and global.

    Economic reality will likely be the trigger that leads to First Blood. The American Revolution III will go hot as soon as the first minions of the Left don’t get their monthly hand-out from the Political Class. Government will wield a heavy hand, Patriots will cut the hand off, and it’s on…

    These will be the most vulnerable moments in the history of the republic. Our foreign enemies may sense the time has come to strike. Our current Political Class will have no incentive to pull the nuclear trigger to keep our enemies at bay, as they are philosophically aligned with the Leftists of the world who would come to conquer us. One can only hope that there are Warriors in our military who will act for the benefit of the republic in such circumstances, when our Leaders will not…

    On the ground across the nation, in cities and suburbs and out to our farms and ranches, it is reasonable to conclude that the battle between Patriots and the Left will be a fight to the death. Unlike our prior revolutions, where in the first we had a foreign enemy and in the second the forces for Liberty did not have a reasonable understanding of just how bad a life of Collectivism truly would become and were loathe to kill their Countrymen in a manner consistent with the realities of Total War, today the forces of Liberty will have few moral hindrances.

    Patriots today understand clearly what the Left intends for our lives. Many have also concluded that, whether you were born in America or not, if you seek to impose Collectivism upon the nation, you are not truly American, and you are a justifiable target. Collectivism has brought the republic to the ruinous state that we have today, and Collectivism is the enemy to be destroyed.

    The moral considerations are simple: If Collectivists retain power, individual Liberty will be lost for generations. If you believe that Liberty is of such value that Collectivism is not an option, then the rules of war become secondary to victory. While most Americans have an innate moral compass that would preclude atrocities as seen in most wars, absolute victory will be the order of the day.

    But the ugly truth is simple: If you are in a fight for your life, there are no rules. Win, or die.

    These are not my rules. Mother Nature wrote these rules.

    Hate the game, not the player…

    It is the Left that has brought us to this point, through their arrogant insistence that we conform to their rules of life. It is the policies of Collectivists (Liberals, Democrats and Republicans) that have ruined our economy and brought poverty roaring back to life in the most productive nation on the planet. It is the Left and their allies in the Political Class who send armed men to enforce their diktats.

    A deathfight will likely determine how the next chapter in the Story of America will read.

    None of these realities permit the Patriot to draw First Blood. The moral high ground belongs to he who strikes in self defense. Nor do these realities justify any Patriot who abdicates the responsibility to go to the polls and vote. These realities do not give the Patriot license to withdraw from the civics of life in America.

    Just because you conclude that a hot war is inevitable, there is no moral justification to lay aside the tools of society that were set in place as an alternate means to violence. If you quote Jefferson and the tree of liberty as you clean your tricked black rifle, while turning your back on the mechanisms of peaceful governance, such as voting, you cede every moral right to justifiable revolution.

    If you do not vote and you advocate violence in the name of Liberty, you are not a Patriot, you are a thug. Right wing thugs aspire to fascism. Left wing thugs aspire to the stations of Mao & Stalin. Real Patriots have little use for thugs…thugs are simply one more target on the list.

    Real Patriots pay more than lip service to the Constitution.

    While generations of Leftist creep can not be rolled back in a single election, there is a very real case to be made that the tools of the Constitution remain viable. Voting is a tool of the Constitution, and it appears that across the nation a significant portion of our Countrymen intend to use this tool to be rid of those who would be Masters.

    While Scott Brown is no Jefferson, neither is he another Ted Kennedy! This election cycle even Barney Frank is watching his rear as he rarely bothers…

    The point is this: Vote for your principles. If your candidates do not reflect your principles, then you run. Exercise your First Amendment rights in more places than the comment rolls of blogs. Go to your City, County and State political events and rattle cages. Anyone who objectively considers the state of the republic today must conclude that it is because Patriots have not fully exercised the Rights and tools of the Constitution that we are at this crossroads. The Left has used the tools, and perverted a few, but Patriots have not bothered to stop them at the ballot box!

    If these tools of the Constitution fail to prevent a conquest by Collectivists, then you still have the tool of the Second Amendment at your disposal. But the Second Amendment must not be the first recourse…under most circumstances.

    If an economic collapse short-circuits many of the philosophical considerations put forth above and negates the need for several election cycles to eradicate the Collectivists from elected office, would you not rather be a Patriot in the twilight of his years who is able to look at the youngest members of the family and honestly say that you voted and used the system right up until the very last moment, when you had no choice remaining but to pick up your rifle?

    Consider this my Get out the Vote moment…even if American Revolution III starts tomorrow.

    Sam
    II

  21. 38 foxyladi14 October 2, 2010 at 3:09 pm

    I already voted

  22. 39 ARMY D.A.V. October 2, 2010 at 6:19 pm

    Dr.Kate

    This is LTC Lakin’s defense Lawyers answer to Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely and the Patriots Union , stay the course .

    Lakin is refusing the help and advice of the Patriots Union , his defense team is only interested in the BC , paper work not the NBC issue…..etc.

    This is the point I was trying to make the other day and you replied , no he didn’t deny the help .

    Read all the White papers let me know what you think.

    http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2734278%3ABlogPost%3A197893&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post

    • 40 drkate October 3, 2010 at 9:54 am

      Army DAV, just got word that Lakin has hired a new defense team…and, it is true they have not refused help…the white paper folks had to get beyond criticizing and to the point of actually offering legal assistance. None of the people who wrote the white papers are lawyers, nor could they provide the help Lakin needed.

  23. 41 A Crazy Old Coot October 3, 2010 at 12:05 am

    As a retired enlisted military person living on a very limited fixed income, what can I do to help LC Lakin and this country? I have written to pelosi, boxer and feinstine with no responses. What else can I do? I can’t affort to travel or send money.

    May God bless this once great country!

    • 42 drkate October 3, 2010 at 10:20 am

      Hi there! Thank you for coming by. And thank you for your service to our Nation.

      Apparently LTC Lakin has hired a new legal defense team that specializes in military law…check this site, which then redirects to the American Patriots Foundation where there are things I know you can do to help!

      http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/10/developing-story-it-appears-ltc-lakin.html

      • 43 Papoose October 3, 2010 at 12:14 pm

        small miracles are just as awesome and joyous when they are small.

        Hope is a feeling. Action is in the doing…

        there is no such thing as a miracle that should be wasted.

        if the Military joins this venture, we shall win, as always.

        There is no greater American Army than We The People. Our sons and daughters will protect us. They need our relentless support.
        There has been no time in History that a People needed their armed forces than We The People today.

        we need to let them know, we know.

        Terry Lakin, my friend and defender, may you and your precious love, your children and your advocates walk in the Light and have a great week. We thank you!

      • 44 Paula October 3, 2010 at 1:06 pm

        Continuing in prayer for LTC Lakin and the United States of America! Thank you Dr. Kate, and all the Patriots of this country who are fightiing for what is right and lawful in this land.

  24. 45 Papoose October 3, 2010 at 9:56 am

    How could a Supreme Court Justice swear in a person as POTUS who admits not to being a Natural Born Citizen?

    What part of my father was a Kenyan who attended college in America and thereafter
    disappeared does Justice John Roberts not understand about the requirements to command our military?

    What part of the 14th Amendment states its intent to amend Article II of the Constitution’s requirements of eligibility for POTUS and VPOTUS?

    Who initiated the suggestion of a private second oath on January 21st, 2009?

    Who suggested it would be delivered behind the backs of the American people?

    When and where and via what commuinque did this suggestion take place? In what annals is this suggestion recorded?

    What does Clarence Thomas know in sneering about the evasion of the eligibility issue?
    When did he know it?
    His statement is live on tape, can he be deposed to explain his remarks?

    Who suggested to barky the pretense of sealing his personal records once sworn in under an Executive Order?

    When was this advice given? What is the purpose? Is it even legal under the rules of what personal information can be sealed?

    What would Chief Justice John Roberts remedy be for an individual who usurped the Office of POTUS under his watch? What would his remedy be for the person who installed the usurper?

    What does Chief Justice Roberts think about having two people take the Bench when they both committed perjury during their hearings and stifled the paperwork and records of their past works?

    What does the term Oath mean to Chief Justice John Roberts?

    Has the term Oath been redefined while we were busy working to pay for the fortunate unfortunate’s luxuries?

    When Clarence Thomas declared “we are evading that issue”, did he admit the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS committed treason? Did Clarence Thomas admit that he is a party to misprison of a felony? Is Clarence Thomas a traitor to the United States of America?

    What was the purpose of the Soetero/Biden meeting with SCOTUS prior to the 2009 inauguration? Was it an official visit? Where are the minutes? Or Was it just an impromtu friendly visit to chit chat about which way the wind was blowing?

    Should SCOTUS be deposed? By whom? Should perjury be waived since an Oath to them is a mere formality of pomp and circumstance?

    Who is the person who wrote two ficticious autobiographies and why was he not certified as constitutionally eligible in The State of Hawaii where no original birth certificate exists for his claim he was born there?

    SC0TUS knows.

    “You lie”. “Not true” just words made in public…

  25. 50 Papoose October 3, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Yo Bill Clinton! Where’s barky’s blue stained dress? Why did you have it dry-cleaned?

    Did you make a lot of money? Or were saved from life in prison?

  26. 51 A Crazy Old Coot October 3, 2010 at 11:48 am

    I have a question.
    Since it appears that we cannot enforce the Constitution now, whrn a real President is elected in 2012, can the sealed records be unsealed and nobama shown to not be NBC, will all his actions (laws he signed) be declared null and void? Will he be tried for fraud, at the minimum?

    • 52 drkate October 3, 2010 at 11:51 am

      Yes…i think that is the plan, but, we have to keep hammering on the ineligibility now so it doesnt become precedent.

    • 53 Papoose October 3, 2010 at 12:40 pm

      They are setting Precedent as to whom can receive FEC $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and sit in the Oval Office as an empty, drugged out, video playing, unamerican gizzard from abroad.

      NOW. NO> is the no in November. Now is the time for all good people to come to the aid of it’s Country.

      Now. They are restructuring. They are bringing in an a new layer of unknowns. Destruction from within.

      WTPOTUS————————–> WORKSHOPS ON HOW TO STEAL YOUR EARNINGS…

      Glenn Beck has his work cut out for him on this new set of infidels coming on board. He might be losing his eyesight which is a real shame since we all know he already lost his hearing.

      They are moving as we await November.

      The “United States under the Threat of Islamic Brutality of America” is here. Check out DC and Chicago. Its the syndicate.
      The Secret Society, thanks to Chief Justice John Roberts.

      We are under slavery by Executive Order.

      R E D I S T R I B U T I O N of every single iota of a thing that is our birthright. That we built. That we earn.

  27. 55 A Crazy Old Coot October 3, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    I have another question.
    Which of his many names does nobama use to sign these bills into law???
    Is it his legal name and if not, are the laws that he signs legal?

  28. 56 aprilnovember811 October 3, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    Guess Who Obama’s Lawyer is for Eligibility Cases
    Elena Kagan
    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/10/guess-who-obamas-lawyer-is-for.html

    • 57 Papoose October 3, 2010 at 1:18 pm

      ~
      I had a daughter born on 8 November. I buried a Daughter named April.

      ~

      There is no Greater Friend than he who would lay down his Life.

      Peace.

      The Time Is Ripe. Harvest.

  29. 59 Papoose October 3, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    His name isn’t barak hussein obama ii.

    Just ask Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Whateversheis Denise Lind. They know. Since an Oath is just a formality, they can lie.

    Its just plain ole embarrassing. We must prevent race riots.

    We know. barky is a liar.

    Hey, and How about that is now okay to lie about your resume under the first Amendment? That’s cool. I can now tell my future employer that I am a decorated Vietnam Vet and was awarded the best penmanship medal for entertaining the troops whilst I doodled all day long?

    Lie about who you are. Claim your African-American and black because Eve, the mummified remains from Africa, shares your mitrochondria. Mama a Mia! Papa pee ya we’s all wee-weed up!

    Lie. Its your right.

    Yeah, lie. That’s the ticket.

    yo, barky. Peekaboo.

  30. 61 Rich T October 3, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    Letter written to Wayne LaPierre, NRA President by Ret Gen Stanley regarding his resignationof membership.

    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/10/02/letter-of-resignation-to-the-nra/

    October 2, 2010

    Reference NRA Membership 00142925369

    Subject: Resignation
    To: Wayne LaPierre NRA

    Wayne:

    After much thought and deliberation, I have decided to resign from the NRA. I realize you are a one issue organization, the support of the 2d Amendment. And you have a general policy of supporting incumbents who support the NRA. I applaud your efforts in not supporting and endorsing Harry Reid.

    However, times have changed and the NRA and the people of America must place the best interests of the country first and be good citizens first above all else. And, yes, we must be Constitutionalists and Patriots first and above all. The Democratic Party today is a party that has gone astray from our Constitution and is one of the biggest threats to the stability of the United States. The NRA is continuing to endorse members of the Democratic Party. I cannot stand by and support the NRA because of this position.

    You must rise above just supporting the 2d Amendment and articulate that you are an organization that supports America first and do not support organizations like the Democratic Party or its members that have become Progressive Socialists. A Democrat who vows to the NRA that they are a Constitutionalist first and not a Progressive Socialist that supports the Democratic platform certainly may be acceptable. The Democrats for the most part will pay lip service to the NRA but then vote a Democratic Socialist agenda that has been proven out in the past eighteen months. Just look at the voting records.

    I have had concern of your endorsement policy for years but now understand fully understand the error of your policy.

    Sincerely,

    Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.)
    Chairman – Stand Up America

  31. 63 jtx October 3, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    At the very least we will now find out what 7 Supreme Court Justii are made of. The lower courts have already shown us … and it ain’t pretty!!

    If the highest court in the land says “piss on the Constitution” by refusing to hear the case or by hearing it on merit and ruling against its precepts, we’ll know that we may as well all move elsewhere … I’m for NZ since at least Trevor Louden knows a COmmunist when he hear/sees/rouches/smells one. Anyone else???

  32. 65 Rich T October 3, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    Just got this in from a friend. Local patriot hero was killed in Afghistan this week.

    Keep the family in prayers.

    COLDSPRING, Texas — The family of a soldier from Coldspring in San Jacinto County, 65 miles north of Houston, says they are the latest to receive heart-breaking news all the way from Afghanistan.

    Betty Harrison said Army messengers visited her home on Wednesday to say her son Calvin Bernard Harrison, 31, an Army medic in the special forces, died in an insurgent attack.

    Coldspring, with a population of less than 1,000, has just one flashing red light at the intersection in front of the historic San Jacinto Courthouse. Thursday the flags at the war memorial in front of the courthouse flew at half staff along with a massive American flag at the intersection of Highways 150 and 156. –An honor for a native son, Betty Harrison’s only son.

    “He was a devoted soldier, a loving father, and a great son,” Harrison said. “He always told us not to worry, that he always was going to come back.”

    • 66 jane October 3, 2010 at 4:42 pm

      I soldier per day is dying under the suicidal rules of engagement from the usurper.
      How can a soldier fight with one hand tied behind their backs?

      The families need to stand with Apuzzo.

  33. 67 Rich T October 3, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    This scool distric is between Houston & Galveston TX. Look at how closely they are monitoring:

    “At that Shell Station, they can see exactly where I am,” Mann said. “I know that because the school cops came up there and said, ‘Hey, you need to get back to school. We tracked you over here.’”

    http://www.khou.com/news/Student-badges-equipped-with-tracking-devices-in-Santa-Fe-104181329.html

    by Tiffany Craig/11 News
    khou.com
    Posted on October 1, 2010 at 6:39 PM

    Updated Friday, Oct 1 at 6:50 PM

    SANTA FE— Students in Santa Fe have to wear ID badges to class, complete with a built-in tracking device.

    The Smart Badge program started this school year, and is getting mixed reviews from parents and students.

    Patrick Mann is a senior and said he feels like he’s in prison.

    “Normally, the one people you would track are say prisoners or somebody that’s done something very wrong,” Mann said.

    All students at Santa Fe Junior High and Santa Fe High School have to wear the radio frequency IDs.

    The sensors are in the ceiling on campus, but Mann said they keep tabs of you off campus too.

    He said he got busted a few days ago.

    “At that Shell Station, they can see exactly where I am,” Mann said. “I know that because the school cops came up there and said,
    ‘Hey, you need to get back to school. We tracked you over here.’”

    The Santa Fe Independent School District got the idea from Spring ISD.

    Spokesperson Patti Hanssard said the bottom line is safety and security.

    “I don’t understand the concern piece there because basically that is our responsibility, to make sure that we have a safe and secure environment,” Hanssard said.

    If students forget their badge, a temporary ID is $1 a day.

    Replacement cards are $15 and the money goes back into the program, Hanssard said.

    One parent said she just doesn’t like the school tracking her son’s every move.

    Letters were sent home about the new badges and an update was printed in the district’s newsletter.

  34. 68 no-nonsense-nancy October 3, 2010 at 6:29 pm

    Rich T, that is fascism through and through. How much more can the citizens of this country take? They have taken our rights away in the name of security. One of the founding fathers, I beleive, said that if we want security we lose liberty. He was right.

  35. 69 Heather October 3, 2010 at 8:27 pm

    Pappose–I just love you–you have a way with all of your words and they ring so true!


  1. 1 | NwoDaily.com Trackback on October 1, 2010 at 11:00 pm
  2. 2 OBAMA’S FALSE FLAG OCTOBER « drkatesview Trackback on October 3, 2010 at 10:49 pm
  3. 3 The Usurpathon’s October Surprise « drkatesview Trackback on October 6, 2010 at 3:48 pm
  4. 4 Unleashed « drkatesview Trackback on October 10, 2010 at 5:51 pm
  5. 5 | NwoDaily.com Trackback on October 12, 2010 at 2:02 am
  6. 6 Removing Obama « drkatesview Trackback on November 5, 2010 at 11:55 pm
Comments are currently closed.



October 2010
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,854,137 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS The Post & Email

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

%d bloggers like this: