Kerchner and Apuzzo Interview on Revolution Radio

©2010 drkate

In case you missed it, the Revolution Radio interview with Commander Charles Kerchner and Attorney Mario Apuzzo is available here for your listening pleasure.The interview focused on the Petition for Writ of Certioriari filed in the Kerchner v. Obama & Congress case.  As the last interview before the November 23 Supreme Court conference on the case, it was a rare opportunity to talk with these two defenders of our Constitution.

Why we need to have a definition of ‘natural born Citizen‘:

  • Having a person sit as President and Commander in Chief of the Military who is not a ‘natural born Citizen’ puts the national security of the United States at risk
  • The rule of law needs to be protected
  • The Supreme Court should grant review so as to maintain the proper balance of power between the three branches of government in our constitutional republic
  • Whether or not the President and Commander in Chief is legitimately sitting in those offices impacts the nation’s foreign policy
  • The nation needs a definition of “natural born Citizen” for future presidential and vice presidential elections

  • September 2009

20 Responses to “Kerchner and Apuzzo Interview on Revolution Radio”

  1. 1 Ted November 18, 2010 at 8:10 pm

    Dr Kate:–

    If you can isolate and link just a recording of the questioner “Jack” and the Commander and Mario’s response, running from the 80 minute mark to the 92 minute mark — and hopefully others can have that spread throughout the blogosphere and to all members of Congress — that would be fantastic.

    The Commander and Mario really get said, beautifully and powerfully, what is at stake were the Supreme Court to fail to find standing on November 23. In other words, that part of the discussion precisely hits the political ramifications, which need to be emphasized to the American people and the Court itself.


  2. 3 Ted November 18, 2010 at 8:17 pm

    …and Dr. Kate, perhaps tied in to the below posting recently made (and feel free to use it without crediting “Ted”):

    “November 23, 2010 marks a fork in the road for the future of America of more than historic proportions — perhaps on par with events leading to the Civil War. To date, virtually all federal and state courts where actions have been brought seeking decision on the meaning of the Constitution’s Article 2 “natural born citizen” clause as a prerequisite for Barack Obama to be a lawful President and Commander in Chief of the United States (Mr. Obama having been born to a father of British/Kenyan nationality and father not a citizen of the United States), have been shut down, never getting beyond the issue of standing.

    To date, courts have very strategically (narrowly if not artfully) characterized and applied law and legal procedure steadfastly to prevent the question from ever rising to the merits — this on a host of different types and classes of plaintiffs, causes and defendants — admittedly under the most intensely implicit (if not more) pressure to do the same.

    The national media (some say our 4th branch of government) has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing this as a “Hawaii birth” a/k/a “birther” issue which is nothing more than a “red herring” in that the issue for Article 2 “natural born citizen” is Mr. Obama’s father. Moreover, the legal community has aided and abetted the avoidance by mischaracterizing the 1898 Supreme Court Case, Wong Kim Arc, which dealt with the meaning of “citizenship”, not the meaning of “natural born citizen” under Article 2.

    November 23, 2010 may very well be the last chance for the Judicial Branch realistically to take up the issue, this on a case of legal standing solidly presented by Attorney Apuzzo and Commander Kerchener. If the Court finds no standing here, by a narrow interpretation of the same or otherwise, coming after all the rest of the “no standing” cases, it is doubtfull this important Constitutional issue can and will be resolved in any court of law. The question will nevertheless continue to fester, at tremendous national cost, never to abate, potentially to reach crisis stage, and in any event to undermine the structure of our Constitutional Republic.

    It is more than chilling and says volumes that NOT ONE member of Congress will publicly speak on this or, better yet, since the Congress of the United States has more than a vested interest, opine if not as a “friend of the court” at the Supreme Court, in the court of public opinion — BEFORE the Supreme Court convenes on November 23, 2010.

    The world is (should be) watching!

    • 4 tfb November 19, 2010 at 1:13 am

      This is a profound “come to Jesus” moment for SCOTUS. Their actions Nov 23, 2010 will be an open admission of utter defiance of the Constitution, disclosing to all their abhorring of it, not its upholding.

      We have nothing whatsoever left to hold on to, nor to lose, if they shred this very last hope.

  3. 5 Ted November 18, 2010 at 8:25 pm

    … or feel free to revise the posting

  4. 7 Ted November 18, 2010 at 10:38 pm

    Perhaps Attorney Apuzzo could have the Court take judicial notice of all these state legislative actions because in crafting thesse laws it would be more than relevant and instructive for the legislatures to know the constitutional meaning and application of Article 2 “natural born citizen” — as interpreted by the Supreme Court.

    As a corollary, each and eveRy such state should immediately publicly direct inqury to the US Dept. of Justice, Attorney General or other appropriatde federal office for exact advice!!!

    How’s that!!!

  5. 8 Ted November 18, 2010 at 10:41 pm

    Bottom line, if any one state passes such law, Obama is finished; so we can safely say, at the very least he’s a one termer, if not removed or resigns before then.

  6. 11 Quantum Leap November 18, 2010 at 11:52 pm

    Good. I get a chance to listen to the archive.

    Challenging this vile and evil man is no easy task. He has no conscience.

    It is now believed that he is punishing the people with illegal strip searches as punishment for the Nov 2 vote blow-out.

    Watch what he says because the truth is opposite of what he says. He does the opposite of what he says ALWAYS.

    ‘Thank President Obama’

    “So we can thank President Obama for this frontal assault on our Fourth Amendment rights. Mind you, this is the same man who insisted that ‘we will not succumb to a siege mentality that sacrifices the open society and liberties and values that we cherish as Americans,'” Whitehead said.

    He said the Fourth Amendment’s provisions make clear the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

    “It’s a huge civil liberties issue,” he told WND. “In the United States, we’ve never before strip-searched – full-body strip searches – unless there’s reasonable suspicion of some kind of criminal activity.”

    The case explains since the constitutional violations are preventing Roberts and Poe from earning a living, they need to be compensated and given “all other measures of damages legally allowed.”

    At, there was a report that the Electronic Privacy Information Center has pursued in court efforts to obtain information about the TSA’s use of scanners.

    WND H/T

  7. 14 tfb November 19, 2010 at 1:27 am

    The fact not one member of congress has whispered a word about the real issue, that it is barky’s father that is the crux of this matter…

    along with a steady stream of “must show birth certificate” bills coming out…

    and the msm giving up on obama as a loony incompetent…

    says that the powers that be DO NOT WANT NBC DEFINED AND THEY WANT BOBBY JINDAL (who is not a NBC–his office will not respond to this statement) AND OTHER FOREIGNERS TO RUN IN THE FUTURE

    CDR Kerchner…I thing SCOTUS will try to throw you an interim bone, don’t know how exactly but what they will allow is Obama OUT because he wasn’t born in Hawaii and they will refuse to define NBC…

  8. 15 Quantum Leap November 19, 2010 at 2:50 am


    TSA violations of the 4th amendment
    One hundred percent of all terrorists to date have been radical muslims – extremists; thus, the ONLY sensible thing to do is screenb ALL radical muslim estremists. Nothing other than thbat is necessary at this time.

    Remember: the current TSA violations of our 4th Amendment rights may be designed to stop air travel as a contribution of the Obama regime effort to destroy the domestic American capitalistic economy hoping, of course, their plans for a socialist state will be more acceptable.

    Remember: Capitalism works; socialism does not work.

    Respectfully submitted,

    Thomas J. Coyne, Ph.D.,
    (Financial Economist)

    • 16 Paula November 19, 2010 at 10:22 am

      My thougthts, exactly. I said to my husband last night that they’re probably trying to wipe out the airlines by implementing these grotesque searches on innocent people, then the government bails them out, and we have more socialism in place; we Americans have to determine: “not on my watch!” It’s all in their plans, but I’m praying their evil plans will backfire here in America, and that Americans will push back and let these cowards know that we aren’t going to stand for this nonsense. Our Congress truly needs prayer that they can do what is right for Americans, and body searches and radiation pictures aren’t good! What evil preveils in this country all because the Constitution is being trampled by the very ones we’ve put in office to uphold it!

  9. 17 no-nonsense-nancy November 19, 2010 at 7:47 am

    QL, that is an angle I didn’t think of. Coyne is right. It is a strain sometimes to attempt to figure out their strategy. They are so devious. But we are smarter than they are because we are always one step ahead of them.


  1. 1 WELL WORTH THE TWO HOURS… | Trackback on November 19, 2010 at 8:00 am
  2. 2 Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner will be on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate – Wed, 17 Nov 2010, 9:00 p.m. EST « CDR Kerchner's Blog Trackback on January 8, 2011 at 3:24 pm
Comments are currently closed.

November 2010

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: