Almost 100 years later, the destructive events of 1913 have come to fruition as the excruciating moment we are living in the united States, and in the form of the direct usurpation of the White House by foreigner Obama.
That a usurpation has happened in our Country, given the protections outlined in the Constitution, means that fundamental components of the republic have been severely damaged and are broken–the monetary system, the proper role of a federal government, state sovereignty, national security, and individual responsibility. A perfect storm.
A great deal of that destruction began during the year 1913, when the progressive era ushered in by Teddy Roosevelt became ‘reality’ with the arrival of Woodrow Wilson in March 1913. Legislation and two Constitutional Amendments were rushed through in 1913 that would set the stage for the erosion of fundamental cornerstones and institutions of our Republic.
The three events are:
- Federal Reserve Act of 1913
- 16th Amendment
- 17th Amendment
This essay discusses how each of these historic actions enabled the disruption of the checks and balances in the Constitution and how they have directly contributed to usurpation of the White House in 2008. Importantly, in order to prevent a usurpation from happening again, each of these three 1913 actions must be undone. In other words, it will never be enough to just remove Obama; to prevent an obama from ever taking over our government again, things must be changed.
Federal Reserve Act: The New World Order
The Federal Reserve Act: December 23, 1913
An Act to provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of re-discounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes. (emphasis added)
The underlined words and phrases in the text above outline the two fundamental violations of the Constitution and the Framers’ intent. The first is the development of an ‘elastic currency’ and ‘commercial paper'; the second is the thinly disguised central control over the nation’s money supply.
The true purposes of the Federal Reserve Act, however, were to counter certain trends in the American economy that favored thrift over debt. In a word, Americans were getting too independent. It was introduced in 1909.
First, the productivity of Americans was enabling the accumulation of wealth among citizens, who were then investing their own profits for capitalization of new industries instead of using borrowed money. In addition new, non-national banks were springing up all over the country, which caused the New York banks to suffer a steady decline of market share. From Griffin:
As early as 1896 the number of non-national banks had grown to sixty-one percent , and they already held 54% of the nation’s banking deposits. By 1913, that number had grown to 71% non-national banks holding 57% of the nation’s deposits.
A direct result of this growth in the Nation’s economy was the development of free market interest rates which set a realistic balance between debt and thrift. That balance was a result of a limited money supply–ultimately depending upon how much gold that particular bank held.
The reason this subject ends up in an article about 2010 in the United States is that the same people who manipulated the system then are the same who now are the champions of the New World Order, and who installed Obama. The devotion to centralizing and controlling the money supply of the United States was championed during this time by Aldrich (grandfather of Rockefeller), Rothschild, Warburg, Morgan, and Khun-Loeb, who quickly
found their allies in congress swallowed congress. A steady march to centralization ensued, ensnaring many a political figure.
The election of 1912 would have surely been won by Howard Taft, save the decision of the Jekyll Island bankers and associates to run Woodrow Wilson and Teddy Roosevelt, supporting them both. Wilson won the presidency with only 42% of the vote, and would have been a footnote in history had Roosevelt not run.
Having successfully installed their first President, the banking cartel quickly moved to pass the Federal Reserve Act (FRA) with Wilson’s full support. Over much opposition the FRA was passed on the evening of December 23, 1913. Louis McFadden would write in 1932 of the FRA:
“When the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that… the United States were to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has nothing but raw materials and heavy goods for export; that Russia [China, India…] was destined to supply the man power and that this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate — a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.”
But additional work had to be done to implement this arrangement and further entangle America in its grips. Two unconstitutional Amendments were illegally ratified during 1913 that did indeed do the trick: the 16th and 17th amendments. The first allowed Congress to step outside its taxing authority, giving it more money to spend than the states, and the second cut the states out of decisions at the federal level, undermining state sovereignty–the ultimate ‘check’ on the federal government.
Pushing Spending and Borrowing: The 16th Amendment
The Federal Reserve now needed a major client to borrow money–the United States–so it could earn money on interest. The shift from thrift to debt service was the goal. But Congress was limited to spending for the purposes enumerated in the Constitution, so even if money were borrowed from this source, how could the government pay it back?
The unconstitutional amendment to tax the income on Americans was illegally ratified by outgoing Taft administration Secretary of State Philander Knox in February 1913. Knox had previously been an attorney for the individuals who pushed the Federal Reserve Act, and appears to have been a deliberate placement in the Taft Administration.
Philander Knox had for many years been the primary attorney for the richest men in America, including Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, the Vanderbilts,the Mellons, and others. He had created for them the largest cartel in the world, then was appointed, at their request, as the Attorney General in the McKinley/Roosevelt administrations, where he refused to enforce the Sherman anti-trust laws against the cartel he had just created. The income tax amendment was pushed through Congress in 1909 by Sen Nelson Aldrich, father-in-law of John D Rockefeller Jr, and grandfather and namesake of Nelson A Rockefeller, and would not have been ratified if Knox had not fraudulently proclaimed it so.
Proof of the failure to ratify the 16th Amendment is discussed in the book “The Law the Never Was” and also here. Arguing over whether it is a direct or indirect tax, which has constitutional specifications for apportionment, Congress has finally decided it is an ‘excise tax’. In explaining the nature of this ‘excise tax’…
According to the Congressional Research Service, the federal income tax is not a tax on income. It is a privilege tax measured by income. In other words, Congress is taxing some government-defined privilege and income is merely the measuring stick to determine the value of the privilege. Nowhere in this report does CRS identify the so-called privilege that is the basis for the tax.
Unalienable rights to enjoy the fruits of ones labor are given by God, not governments. But you can see why government grew–it had to create those government privileges to justify tax hikes.
The ‘for other purposes’ phrase in the Federal Reserve Act soon became synonymous with the Congress borrowing the money from the Federal Reserve, repaying the principle plus interest. Congress borrows on anticipated income from taxes, using the taxes to service the debt. Or so it was supposed to work.
It also had the practical result of forcing the citizenry to pay taxes on income, thus driving the savings rate down and forcing the use of borrowed money to capitalize business ventures and infrastructure.
The vast new spending allowed by the 16th Amendment, coupled with a Woodrow Wilson presidency inclined to foreign entanglements, which we were warned against, easily allowed the Rothschild formula to be used in the United States to lend it money to war against Germany, which it was also funding. So the United States entered WWI and the cycle that had already ravaged Europe began in America. Boom, bust, social security, WWII. Gradually shifting the country from thrift to debt:
The Federal Reserve Act and the 16th Amendment combined have dealt nearly a fatal blow to the Republic…and have come roaring back to promote a merciless exploitation of the American people once again. Trillions of dollars printed, devaluing any worth to the dollar; the current regime uses the Tax Code and thugocracy IRS to enforce yet more taxes on income to pay “for other purposes”…health care, government bailouts, foreign enterprises, government bloat.
The Federal reserve is still controlled by the monied interests who formed it in 1913. Increased influence over the U.S. government was enabled through the immense accumulation of wealth by only a very few individuals, who used their enormous wealth to further their influence. This facilitated the placement of Presidents, secretaries of state and defense, and advisers in key positions all advancing a new world order agenda. Any ‘movement’ can be ‘let in’ to this game–Muslim jihadists, communists, the left, etc., as long as it does not disrupt this cartel and its business of
policy making war, drugs, and arms in the new world order.
This cartel boldly usurped the Presidency of the United States when they paid for the installation of Obama into the White House.
Gutting State Sovereignty–The 17thAmendment
The Senate is the most powerful body in the U.S. Government. Any new federal law, treaty, or declaration of war requires the Senate’s majority or super majority. The Senate confirms all federal judges and officers in the Executive Branch, and two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict an impeached federal official (67 senators).
The original design of the Constitution was that each state’s two senators were selected by the state legislature, so as to ensure the State’s voice in the Congress. They were accountable to the state legislatures, and were therefore duty bound to protect our reserved sovereign powers against federal encroachment. The Founders did not intend that the only check on government was at the ballot box; the state legislatures, represented by its Senators, would serve as a powerful check because they would act to prevent the invalid expansion of the federal government at the expense of the state and its people.
The progressives–ever wanting to break down this original design of the Republic, argued for the 17th amendment as a means of ‘giving a voice to the people’. It was a
The cartel saw the 17th amendment as a way to eliminate any barriers to the placement of cartel-friendly judges and other individuals in key appointments. There was, as well, an increased opportunity to pass treaties that might be favorable to the international new world order cartel.
The true problem with the initial design was a procedural issue that the state legislatures were deadlocking in choosing Senators, resulting in the loss of representation in Congress for months at a time. The amendment could have fixed the procedural problem without changing the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
Responding to a question about changes he would like to see in the Constitution, Scalia was quoted as saying,
“There’s very little that I would change….I would change it back to what they wrote, in some respects. The 17th Amendment has changed things enormously.” Scalia added, according to news accounts, “We changed that in a burst of progressivism in 1913, and you can trace the decline of so-called states’ rights throughout the rest of the 20th century. So, don’t mess with the Constitution.”
Scholars have proven that the 17th amendment was not legally ratified, although was declared on May 31, 1913 by Wilson’s Secretary of State William J. Bryan, who had long sought to “free the Senate from the control of the corrupt state legislatures.”
The deliberate failure of the republican elite to take back the Senate in 2010 by undermining its most conservative candidates just shows how valuable to the ruling elite the 17th amendment is. This assures that the Senate will continue to go along with the dangerous Obama agenda and will not convict Obama on impeachment.
At this moment in our history, we could definitely have used the layer of protection offered by state legislature-selected Senators, who would be bound to halt the federal encroachment on the states, not support it.
Obama’s Three-Legged Stool
We face an unacceptable risk with Obama in the White House, and for any usurper there…to our national security, the integrity of our nation, and our sovereignty. The seeds for this usurpation were placed long ago, and the mechanics of the institutions…the infiltration of all three branches of the government, education, and societal institutions, have taken about seventy years. Somebody in the NWO cartel called the usurpation event for now… and it is also happening elsewhere.
We know that Obama’s Achilles heel is his ineligibility…something I do believe his handlers hoped to dispose of early on but have not been able to. His support is derived from the three items discussed in this article, what I am calling his three-legged stool:
- The NWO-banking cartel: money, including money laundering, infrastructure, advisory personnel in legal, policy, military affairs; ‘allowed’ to add czars and appoint communists for vanity and payoff reasons
- Authority of government, in particular, the use of agencies such as the IRS to enforce unconstitutional legislation; predicated on the illegal 16th amendment and resulting infrastructure; packing legislation; using executive orders..this control extends to the judiciary and the military
- Control of the Senate, in particular, the ability to manipulate elections, buy off or destroy the opposition, and circumvent the states
It is not coincidental that the first known usurper in history uses only unconstitutional tools to get him into office and to advance his agenda. That tells us our weak points, and maps out our recovery at the same time.
Removing Obama & Preventing Usurpation
Nearly one hundred years later, there is an enlightened group of Patriots who now have the chance to reverse these abominations to our Constitution. The usurpation of Obama has illuminated this scope and web of issues.
Removing Obama based on his ineligibility, or even for other constitutional violations, is the first step in assert the Constitution as the governing law in the United States. Removal base on eligibility is the only tool that can be used that will result in the nullification of all of Obama’s legislation and acts; removal by impeachment or ‘mental disability’ under the 25th Amendment will not.
The apples that fall from Obama’s tree will further expose the corruption that allowed the usurpation, and that includes various senators, congressman, party officials, and people such as Rove, Brazille, and Dean. Certainly other corruption will be exposed as the first insult is investigated.
The Federal Reserve, Campaign Finance, Bailouts and Congress will be another useful avenue of investigation. The trillions of dollars wasted and lost will be an impetus for the elimination of the Fed and its influence within government. Perhaps laws will be passed to prevent Federal Reserve officials from serving in any capacity, such as treasury secretary, in the government. FEC investigation of financial transactions, the Obama campaign, federal bailout funds, and the Fed could add to the pressure to eliminate the Fed.
The 17th Amendment can be addressed via its repeal, by 2/3 of the state legislatures. Alternatively, each state could declare it null and void. Remember the progressive ‘spin’ on this: it is a ‘popular vote’, and returning to the Constitution’s representative system and its advantages will not be understood without a good education program. Senators are accountable to the states; representatives are accountable to the people. And state is also accountable to the people.
More importantly with respect to Obama and the usurpation, an intense focus on republican rino senators, the democrat senators known to have cheated in 2010 will not only undermine their authority but will also expose their connections to the cartel, the fed, and the obama usurpation. Rove and Brazille may be caught in this web.
Preventing a usurpation in the future will depend on regaining the strength we had before the year 1913 and the events that set the stage for Obama’s usurpation. In addition to strengthening our institutions there will be a need to have structural changes based on criteria that prevent financiers, secret society members, and foreign citizens from serving in positions essential to the protection and advancement of the United States.
Focus on the usurper–Obama; prepare for taking a giant leap for our Republic by asserting that the past will not control the future of our Republic.