©2010 drkate
(Author’s note, 12/22). This post was published at 10 pm last night and by early this morning, the key portion on the Lakin trial had been deleted. I have recreated that section to the best of my recollection.)
- the advocacy of a position known to be false.
- An argument which is misused to advance an agenda or to reinforce one’s deeply held beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
The intellectual dishonesty of the eligibility deniers, including chief Obama, the left, the 111th Congress, the so-called ‘media’, the Courts, the attorneys, and now the military, has been completely and cleanly exposed by their strenuous efforts to defend Obama’s lack of Article II eligibility against all evidence to the contrary. While their petty goal is to ruin and ridicule anyone who raises the issue, their feigned superiority betrays a significant moral decay and fundamental anti-Americanism.
Unfortunately for America, in knowingly defending the breach of the ‘natural born citizen’ clause of Article II, these entities commit ‘treason to the constitution‘. And so appropriately for the deniers, they face easily documented misprision of felony and misprision of treason charges. For this kind of fundamental intellectual dishonesty is endangering the Nation.
Continue reading ‘The Intellectual Dishonesty of the Eligibility-Deniers’
Recent Comments