Amending the Constitution by Fiat

©2011 drkate

As the cover story for the so-called ‘bin-ladin’ kill begins to unravel and the BBC actually asks, in a headline now removed, “why isn’t there more Muslim reaction to the death of bin ladin?”, America is coming to grips with its first clear view of a false flag operation designed to draw attention away from Obama’s illegitimacy as President.  It mirrors his life.

Pam Geller has an outstanding article at WND discussing the release of Obama’s electronic LFCOLB in the context of BHO Sr.’s immigration files, Corsi’s new book, and the relentless pressure from Donald Trump.  Obama had to release whatever he could to cover up the fact of his father’s citizenship, but also that at the time of Obama jr’s birth,  he was already married  and the marriage to Ann Dunham may have been a sham to extend his visa stay in the U.S., which expired in August 1961.  Her bottom line from her analysis:

That would make the president illegitimate. In 1787, illegitimate children had different rights. There is no way the founders of this great nation intended for an illegitimate child of a foreign bigamist to attain the highest, most powerful position in the new land.

caught in a lie

If this is true, is it an attempt to drop his father from the equation trying to play on the ‘single unwed mother’ theme? The requirements for President in 2011 are the same as  in 1787… born of two citizen parents  in the United States.  Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen, whether he is an illegitimate child or not.

How to account for the statements of Michelle Obama about Obama’s mother being single…or is this disinformation planted three years ago? and from the latest electronic image of Barky’s LFCOLB which bears no seal and no signature of the father.

Michelle Obama in 2008

Michelle Obama made remarks in Kansas City, MO in July of 2008, describing Obama’s sharia law plans working for women’s rights…

He understands them because he was raised by strong women. He is the product of two great women in his life. His mother and his grandmother. Barack saw his mother, who was very young and very single when she had him

See, he only dreamed of his father! But kept the British citizenship.

Since we have not found the Dunham-Obama marriage license, but only the divorce papers, it would appear that Michelle has once again blown Obama’s cover  planted another lie about who he is, or perhaps told the truth.  And that BHO Sr. married Stanley Ann Dunham and had a child only to keep his visa…a practice more common than not.

But hold on–let’s look at this for what it is, another attempt to let Barky slide into the white house:

The most important element is not that his father was a bigamist or his parents were unmarried. What is important is that his father recognized him as his son. If his father did not recognize him then BHO Jr.’ citizenship would not have been under the control of BNA of 1948. However, since his father did recognize him as his son, proven by several acts and statements by BHOSr. and this gave the BNA of 1948 the legitimacy embraced BHOJr. as British subject. It does not matter one wife or ten, married or unmarried, BHOSr. accepted BHOJr. as his legitimate son and thus his (BHOJr.) inheritance was to be afford the title of a subject of Her Britannic Majesty. ~ The Birthers

Amending the Constitution by Fiat

It appears that Obama, in order to get around his foreign father, is trying to secure his American citizenship through his mother.   And possibly hiding a birth in Kenya, which would ruin his claim to American citizenship because of his mother’s age and the laws at the time. Where is the father’s signature on the LFCOLB? Can he continue to hide the fact of his Indonesian adoption and citizenship?

This is the scenario he would like to get to the Supreme Court, and have his agents amend the constitution by letting him slide with a foreign father and underage citizen mother, without ever having to disclose any records.

If it is the will of the American people to amend Article II to permit dual allegiance, there is a process where the entire nation gets to decide this, not nine purchased judges on the Supreme Court or a handful of jackasses in Congress.

No amending by fiat

ps: no seal, no deal.

110 Responses to “Amending the Constitution by Fiat”

  1. 1 drkate May 5, 2011 at 4:11 pm

    And don’t forget this kind of fraud shown below by Susan Daniels. Who uses stolen ssns? Illegal aliens.

    • 3 JanH May 6, 2011 at 8:51 am

      Time to pressure Donald Trump to stay on track

      Unfortunately, the question must be asked, why should we have to pressure him?

  2. 4 eddie h. May 5, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    i went out to eat dinner. the waiter working my table was an obot. he brought up the reported killing of bin laden. i informed him it was a hoax and that george bush knew it and that was why he did not attend the circus in new york. he continued to go back and forth about democrats and republicans the rich and poor and the same old bullshit that has gone on since fdr. finally another obot called him over and agreed with him so when he came back to me i left it at that with one last statement expressing how ignorant stupid and dumb so many americans are to believe anything the usurpur and the media put out. the obot waiter was totally ignorant on the constitution and natural born citizen and im sure the other one is also. the obot waiter kept saying obama had assured himself of a second term . i informed him it is not over yet. as the great baseball player stated it is not over until it is over meaning in baseball the last out has to be gotten before a ball game is over. that was yankee great yogi berra.

    • 5 sky May 5, 2011 at 10:41 pm

      It isnt a hoax,dont click on any obama pictures,if they come out because this is what the terrorist wants you to do.Got info from the people who know.This is no time for things to be said if not fact.Why wasnt clinton there?He had a chance to get him when he was president.

    • 6 heather May 6, 2011 at 6:57 am

      Did you leave him a tip? I wouldn’t have. Oddly enough there are times when I am in the presence of an obot and barry comes up–I have just taught myself to say, “REALLY”? And continue using the word everytime they open their mouth. Eventually it gets their attention and you win!

  3. 7 no-nonsense-nancy May 5, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    Thanks, Dr. Kate, for this essay and fro the very good radio show featuring Susan Daniels. Our country is so lucky to have patriots like her and like you. We win this battle.

    Eddie, good for you speaking your mind in the restaurant. We need to all talk to the public like that and inform them.

    And we all do need to put pressure on Trump to take the next steps. He should have been really pi***d at BO at that dinner.

  4. 8 Pamela Barnett May 5, 2011 at 6:39 pm

    Dr. Kate you forgot to mention the first oral arguments in appeals court the next morning as yet another reason for this wag the dog stunt by obama. Here they are –

    BTW, Pamela Geller’s analysis is wrong regarding obama being illegitimate.

    We have to look at the only legal document we do have – a Hawaii divorce decree for Obama Sr. and SAD. This proves they were married when obama was born.

    If you look at the rest of documents released on Sr., you will see that their marriage was uncontested.. and now they are both dead along with the judge.. you can’t change that.

    the release of obama’s father’s records was a ploy to cast doubt on the legality of their marriage. If obama was a bastard child in the U.S. he would not have been born with British citizenship. Obama got nervous about our lawsuit Barnett, Keyes v. Bowen. Obaama knows he is not natural born if he was born a Britsh citizen.. so he’s trying to back track now.

    • 9 drkate May 5, 2011 at 8:35 pm

      Pamela, thank you, I will revise the post

      • 10 anonymouse May 5, 2011 at 10:18 pm

        Geller is not gung ho enough about JSJS2P NBC (jus soli jus sanguinis both parents), she never brings the subject up on FOX, I always wondered if she was strongarmed about it too. And then this article, she doesn’t question BHO Sr’s file’s content enough.

        • 11 heather May 6, 2011 at 7:03 am

          Pam’s last appearance on fox was a panel last week, with Monic Crowley and 2 other men (forget who they were)– they had enlarged the bc the size of a chalk board (becks)and Pam or Monica never mentioned his father–with this humongous thing right in their faces. Not a word – so yes I am guessing that fox stifled her as well.

    • 12 Alex May 6, 2011 at 7:14 am

      Captain Barnett, you are an American hero. Thank you for your great service!

      Some info for those who are interested in knowing more about what Captain Barnett has done for our country:

      It’s so inspiring when people like you, Dr. Kate, and others stand up for our Constitution in such a fearless way!

  5. 13 Papoose May 5, 2011 at 6:51 pm

    You know I love this.

    This is Great!


    Coup d’etat. in living color… working on the language. take note.
    changing terms… we need a new Webster.

  6. 14 Philo-Publius May 5, 2011 at 7:33 pm

    BREAKING: CBS News obtains document linking asst. AG to ‘Gunrunner’

    One document indicates a Holder Asst. Attorney General, Lanny Breuer, authorized a wiretap in the controversial gun trafficking case headquartered in Phoenix. In that case, called “Fast and Furious,” multiple sources say ATF allowed thousands of guns to hit the streets, destined for Mexican drug cartels.

  7. 15 Papoose May 5, 2011 at 7:41 pm

    Philo, thank you for bringing my Auntie Upps to the forum upstairs.

    I am so blessed in that she is someone who loves me. I love her.

    She’s a vivid rainbow striking through the most huge darkening manmade clouds. She is so deliciously logical. She is springtime.

    Its not always about barky. Uppity Woman brings you to a halt.

    Always On time. With the patience of Job.

    A bouquet of white roses. And greetings, dear Philos-Publius.


  8. 16 Philo-Publius May 5, 2011 at 7:55 pm

    Just watched the Repub debate from SC.

    Herman Cain stood out like I thought he would….he certainly made an impression with the Frank Luntz audience all overwhelming said he won.

    • 17 heather May 6, 2011 at 7:12 am

      Yes he did–his answers were short, brief and to the point and he never used his hands for talking points–he impressed them all including fox. Oh but, Cain is Neal Boortz’s pick and some of his answers were based on Boortz’s own desires.

      I find Boortz to be very self serving and arrogant and one way, like an obot! I hope Cain doesn’t get GROOMED by Boortz.

      • 18 drkate May 6, 2011 at 9:15 am

        Cain is a NWO hack

        • 19 heather May 6, 2011 at 9:30 am

          If thats the case-this means every candidate past, present and future are buy offs of the NWO! Cain is not my candidate-at all but fox report that cain got 48% last night an ron paul just behind him. Although cnn says that ron paul is the only one who can beat barry. No I think Trump without a doubt–and he’s been very quiet for a week whats up with him?

  9. 20 Philo-Publius May 5, 2011 at 7:58 pm

    You’re welcome Papoose

  10. 21 eddie h. May 5, 2011 at 8:20 pm

    it worries me that the usurpur may be playing a game with us. he puts out a birth document that is an obvious fake and later at the appropiate time he puts out a more perfect forgery that will be prepared by professional forgers. we have to be very careful and not fall into a trap. we must continue to stress his dual citizenship but also stay on the questions about the so called b. c. he provided. either the usurpur may be playing a game or somebody could have set him up.

    • 22 Papoose May 5, 2011 at 8:35 pm

      we’re living in a coup, eddie.

      milage tax? what more do we need to know? what’s next? breath meters strapped to our cell phones?

  11. 24 Papoose May 5, 2011 at 8:38 pm

    will we be mandated to be in possession of a cell phone at all times? will we get fined if we do not have a bank of info to hand over upon demand?

    Coup, Chicagonista. no ifs ands or buts about it.

  12. 26 Paxson May 5, 2011 at 8:43 pm

    Miss Tickly aka TerryK is closing her blog tomorrow night. She has worked her bottom off on behalf of our country and I give her my personal thank you.

    • 27 Quantum Leap May 5, 2011 at 11:38 pm

      Thanks You Ms Tickly. Don’t stay away too long. I hope you guest post at various blogs. {{hint}} 😉

      • 28 Quantum Leap May 5, 2011 at 11:48 pm

        mispelled my email.

        Thank You Ms Tickly. Don’t stay away too long. I hope you guest post at various blogs. {{hint}} 😉

    • 29 Alex May 6, 2011 at 7:40 am

      Wow, thanks for letting us know. I wonder what the story is there?

      • 30 Bones May 6, 2011 at 8:04 am

        Thank you, thank you, for all of your spot-on work Miss Tickly!

        • 31 drkate May 6, 2011 at 9:21 am

          Thank you Miss Tickly for all your work. It is superb and you have contributed so immensely. Your last work, “The Odds are Racist” was terrific, a piece of work that will stand the test of time. I wish you the best, and I look forward to hearing from you again. If you ever want to post anything here, you are welcome to. God Speed.

  13. 32 Drew May 5, 2011 at 8:45 pm

    Re: – “…from the latest electronic image of Barky’s LFCOLB which bears no seal and no signature from the father.”

    Well, I don’t see any space for the father to sign the LF-COLB — that is, in a case where the mother did sign.. There’s only about enough room for one parent (or “other informant”) to sign.

    The missing seal in the PDF copy is glaring problem… Although there are odd traces of a “hidden” seal that has been crudely deleted, as if done by amateurs — like the rest of the LF-COLB image appears to have been done by amateurs.

    ( The center of the hidden seal is directly below the number ’21’ in box 21.. The top of the circle isn’t clear, but should be just below the number ’21’.. The right and left edges are the clearest, and the exact center is just below the lower-most black line.. This is best seen (in Adobe Reader) at about 300 or 400% magnification.. The left edge of the circular seal is below the ‘- 8’ of the stamped date in box 20, while the right edge is below the ‘U K’ of ‘U K L Lee’ signature.. Traces of the round seal appear as if covered over with the digital equivalent of ‘whiteout’ correction fluid, leaving a round pattern of small white dots, blending into the green-and-white patterned background. )

    Why would they delete the seal? .. The seal has no unique data; it’s just a standard seal..

    It looks like the LF-COLB ‘template’ was a scratch-pad, used by amateurs or children, for practice…

    Home made… in the Whitehouse?

    • 33 heather May 6, 2011 at 7:23 am

      I see the white dots of the outline of the seal and yes it has to magnified at 400. If they used the Nordyke twins BC as a template their seal would show as an impression/etching. So therefore the seal is traceable to the notary and if this paper was a template the notary is on notice. Does that make sense? Kind of hard to explain in a short verse.

      And btw–a true bc always has 2 lines for both mother and father to sign — not just 1. All of my families all have 2 lines.

  14. 34 Papoose May 5, 2011 at 8:54 pm

    No seal. No deal.

  15. 36 tiger 7 May 5, 2011 at 9:08 pm

    May is going to be an interesting month, kids—the bin Laden deal, the Corsi book, the Blago retrial, the end of the Trump TV deal, the release of L/C Lakin, the rumblings in the military, the disention in the WH(?), the second fake BC , the Gun Runner fiasco, and who knows what else.
    It’s getting close to the time when the Fat Lady sings !!

    • 37 RacerJim May 6, 2011 at 9:11 am

      Where is Kate Smith when “We the people…” need to hear her never-bettered rendition of “God Bless America” most?

  16. 38 thinkwell May 5, 2011 at 9:12 pm

    I can tell from the reaction I get to my “commuter message boards” that the tide of public opinion seems to be turning on the eligibility issue of the criminal fraud in the White House.

    For about the past year I have placed 11″ x 17″ cardboard message boards about the usurper propped up against the headrests inside of the rear window of my car, one on the right side, one on the left. The signs go up during my daily commute to work and on other long drives. When I park in an unsecured public area, they go down until I get back to my car. The actual messages are printed on 11″ x 17″ sheets of paper that I paperclip to the cardboard. I use push pins stuck into the back window deck as stops to keep the bottom of the signs from slipping out of place. For a long time there was a photo of my car that many of you may have seen at the bottom of The Post & Email homepage.

    A year or more ago I used to get almost as many negative reactions as positive (one idiot even tailgated me very close at speed with his brights on for about 15 minutes – too bad I didn’t think to dial 911 and sic the cops on him). Now, almost all the reactions are positive (lots of thumbs ups).

    I have a variety of messages that I rotate onto the sign boards. These include:

    Born a Brit? NOT Legit
    Honk to
    BOOT Obama Now!
    NOT a “natural born Citizen”

    Free Lt. Col. Lakin! (large picture of him in uniform)
    Jail Obama! (smaller picture of the usurper looking very shifty)

    Who is
    Barry Soetoro?

    Another sign simply states in large easy-to-read letters:

    Usurper OUT

    I believe it is important for everyone to get our message out so other supporters of the Constitution know that they are not alone and become emboldened in turn to bring our message to even more Americans and to let the weakling politicians know how many of us there are and how riled up we are. I suggest that everyone start placing similar signs in the rear window of their cars. I think this simple act can really overcome the propaganda of the regime-stream media and can grow and strengthen the public meme about the criminal fraud currently squatting in The People’s White House.

    Dr. Kate,

    Please email me and, if you wish, I will send you PDFs of these 17″x11″ signs which you can post and make available for download. Displaying such signs is something everyone can do. Everyone can make their own signs, too(I made mine in Word), but people may use my PDFs if they want. If you don’t have access to a large format printer, you can go to Kinkos to print them out for pennies (about 4 signs to the dollar, even in color).

    PS: Just in the last week I have received way more than the usual middle finger salutes from frightened obots. I just smile and laugh at them in return, but, IMO, this change in response must mean that obots are really starting to feel the heat.

  17. 39 anonymouse May 5, 2011 at 10:38 pm

    from the post and email

    “Jon Carlson says:
    Thursday, May 5, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    This article statement brings up the problem with Birth certificates not being the be all and end all of the natural born question of a US President:

    It is well-known that George W. Bush was born in New Haven, CT, and no HIPAA law seems to have prevented its discussion. The law was passed in 1996 and Bush was elected president in 2000.

    With GHW Bush (German name George Scherf, Jr.) and Barbara Bush being foreigners from Germany with their Broken spoken English and with his claim to be a son of Prescott Bush (German Name George Scherf) whose name was forged into the 1900 Census in place of a actual son of Samuel Bush, the George W Bush birth certificate lacks credibility for his claimed natural born status. In essence, his parents and grandparents are foreign born and never naturalized and thus illegal aliens. George W Bush is an illegal alien.

    The full research is here:
    1900 Census Kills Fake Bush Genealogy

  18. 41 anonymouse May 5, 2011 at 10:39 pm
    Jon Carlson says:
    Thursday, May 5, 2011 at 9:24 PM

    This article statement brings up the problem with Birth certificates not being the be all and end all of the natural born question of a US President:

    It is well-known that George W. Bush was born in New Haven, CT, and no HIPAA law seems to have prevented its discussion. The law was passed in 1996 and Bush was elected president in 2000.

    With GHW Bush (German name George Scherf, Jr.) and Barbara Bush being foreigners from Germany with their Broken spoken English and with his claim to be a son of Prescott Bush (German Name George Scherf) whose name was forged into the 1900 Census in place of a actual son of Samuel Bush, the George W Bush birth certificate lacks credibility for his claimed natural born status. In essence, his parents and grandparents are foreign born and never naturalized and thus illegal aliens. George W Bush is an illegal alien.

    The full research is here:
    1900 Census Kills Fake Bush Genealogy

  19. 42 anonymouse May 5, 2011 at 10:40 pm

    my posts didn’t post??

  20. 44 sky May 5, 2011 at 11:24 pm

    beforeitsnews the global economy’s corporate crime wave

  21. 45 charlesmountain May 6, 2011 at 4:06 am

    Is miss tickly moving on to better things or is something else happening here?

    • 46 Bones May 6, 2011 at 8:15 am

      I suspect we have not seen the last of Miss Tickly. Her last article was so well-written, objective (read: absent of the all-too-common speculation), and conclusively damning at the same time. All of her articles are that way. That takes a fine-tuned skill that is rare, and she has bucketfuls of it… She should be receiving all kinds of offers.

  22. 47 Jane May 6, 2011 at 5:36 am

    Just read that Odrama is “giving” illegals social security.

    Ah, what a guy huh?!

  23. 48 bill May 6, 2011 at 5:45 am

    For anyone wishing to see the True story of the alleged Bin Laden
    killing,go here: WARNING GRAPHIC !

  24. 49 Jane May 6, 2011 at 6:09 am

    Bill, those photos have been out for days.

    It still doesn’t mean anything regarding Osama.

    • 50 bill May 6, 2011 at 6:56 am

      Yes Jane,You are absolutely right ! There are some who believe
      this was a “search and destroy mission” for a secret DOD spy toy
      that went haywire and the government wanted to keep it from falling into the wrong hands.Without pictures of Osama,I believe this scenario is a total lie,just like everything else,that comes
      out of DC . cheers

      • 51 heather May 6, 2011 at 7:51 am

        Except that today the media is saying Al Qaeda now believes bin laden is dead. Now how would the media know this? Is Al Qaeda IN TOUCH WITH BARRY AND CO?

        The cia created al qaeda-and bin laden. Let’s hope that bin laden in dead and doesn’t POP UP at another convenient time in the future because this time the world knows that barry killed him dead!

        • 52 drkate May 6, 2011 at 9:18 am

          So Bin Ladin was a CIA asset…and ‘al queda’, I mean the CIA is announcing that they believe bin ladin is dead.

          Now, when there is another deadly event, guess who the culprits will be? The CIA/NWO/Zbig. Lets see them try to stage another terrorist event.

          • 53 heather May 6, 2011 at 9:22 am

            agree-but listening to the video from Dr P/he is warning on AJ that they better stop before the american people start a full blown 2nd revolution that we would win.

            but sure–they will try….matter a fact they are all in on it together.

            • 54 heather May 6, 2011 at 9:27 am

              I do believe that bin laden was a CIA agent and was taught by the CIA yrs ago….after all remember Bush Sr was the head of the CIA during jfk–and JFK was killed because he planned to end the fed and the cia—now bind laden was in the US the prior to 911 and the bushes got him out that morning remember? his plane was the only one allowed to leave!

        • 55 sky May 6, 2011 at 1:41 pm

          Barry didnt have it done,He is one of them.Whether cia or mobor spy, The most important thing is follow the money this is the real battle.Rothschilds,big banks,FED,WTO,IMF,UN.Do not click on any usama pictures,this is what alqueda wants you to do,this can be a virus.GOD BLESS AMERICA,they dont like that either.

    • 56 Alex May 6, 2011 at 3:05 pm

      True dat! But did you hear why the neighbors never saw Osama? Because, says the Weather Channel News (?), he was *very* self-disciplined and never left his room and/or compound (don’t remember which)!

      These people are buffoons.

  25. 57 Alex May 6, 2011 at 6:44 am

    There is no way, shape, or form in which Obama could be a natural born citizen, ergo, he is ineligible to be president.

    If you would like to support one of our biggest and strongest fighters for Soetoro to be exposed for the fraud he is, please call in to KABC-LA at 7:30 a.m. PST for Dr. Orly Taitz. Her website says she will be interviewed at that time!

    The number is 800.222.KABC. Hopefully, this is a link that will let you listen:

    Thank you, and good morning :-)!

  26. 58 no-nonsense-nancy May 6, 2011 at 7:04 am

    This is so terrible. Many of us in our area were looking forward to this event practically at my door step.

    Thu, May 5, 2011 7:36:24 PMRe: [Chesco912] pamela geller event cancelled. church threatened by leftist groups
    From: Albert Bryson Add to Contacts


    This is a tragedy. We need to stage a protest at the Avondale Presbyterian Church denouncing them for violating our freedom of speech. We need to make people of Chester County know what has happened and make it clear that our rights have been violated because they are scared of Shariah loving leftist. We need to make it clear that Shariah law is unconstitutional.

    Albert Bryson

    On 5 May 2011 22:22, Linda Jam <lindajam50@ya

    As you know- since Feburary, I have been sending invites to everyone to come to the Pamela Geller event on May 14. everything was progressing smoothly until I received a phone call today, from Pastor Meute of the Avondale Presbyterian Church. Pastor Muete told me that the event was cancelled. Of course I was never asked to give my input about this decision!!
    The pastor never once offered an apology or a opportunity to discuss.
    It seems that the Pastor and his elder members are too cowardly to take a stand against the Shariah loving leftists who threatened to protest when Pamela Geller came to the hall to give a talk about Shariah law. What a bunch of cowards!! is this what this country has morphed in to- MARIPOSAS! &n bsp;
    Here it is- evidence that our country has lost its right to freedom of speech unless you talk trash about Bush or dunk a crucifix in a bottle of urine. This a shameful. How much longer are the good people of this country going to take before all is lost. this is not about us its about our kids. when do we take a stand!!!
    The pastor called Pamela Geller and the American Sheepdogs racists and bigots. I asked the Pastor does he know anyone who is a sheepdog; does he know Pamela Geller. He admitted that he did not. I told the Pastor, "for your information, Pamela Geller and the members of the Sheepdogs are patriots who working hard to keep us free. they are good, decent people unlike the people who threatened you. For a moment, Pastor Meute was silent and then he whinned that I was judging him when I told him he's not a Christian or a Patriot. Judging him?? Is he not judging me and Pamela Geller for trying to teach about a very dangerous enemy? Oh, the hyprocrisy never ends!

    this is the beginning of how we loss our rights. a little chip here and a little chip there. I guess I knew it all along but I kept denying what was the inevitable. its a lot deeper than even I realized

    • 59 heather May 6, 2011 at 7:29 am

      Too bad–seems that everything Geller stands for she would have attended anyway.

      And sorry to say, it’s pastors and ministers like him that have made me not attend church.

      Pastors should not be afraid to preach the word of God regardless of who is in their presence.

  27. 60 no-nonsense-nancy May 6, 2011 at 8:10 am

    PC is going to get many more Americans killed. I intend to send a letter to that Pastor and let him know how I feel. Something similar happened a few weeks ago concerning someone who was going to speak on Sharia Law and were banned from the facility the day of the event which had been planned for months. I can’t remember where i

  28. 61 no-nonsense-nancy May 6, 2011 at 8:14 am

    Sorry, my last comment got sent through before I was finished. Weird things are happening.

    • 63 Alex May 6, 2011 at 10:11 am

      Thank you for posting that, Heather. I just saw it over at FR. I hope you don’t mind if I post a couple of paragraphs here. We need all the encouragement we can get! 😉

      “[Obama’s] birth certificate has yet to be validated,” Scott said Tuesday. “If they can counterfeit $100 bills, I think it’s a million times easier to counterfeit a birth certificate, if you ask me. So, all it is, let’s just see if it’s real. Anybody can produce a document, so let’s check it out.”

      Scott told Mellinger that it is his duty as an American to speak his mind while taking advantage of the platform given to him as a professional athlete.

      “We all have that responsibility as Americans,” Scott said. “Whatever platform you have, large or small, fight for what’s right. Fight for what’s right and fight for the principles of honor, integrity, accountability, being a person. Responsible. Hard work. Discipline. Honesty. Things like that, try and pass those principles on to the next generation. Be a voice for that. Maybe being a baseball player and having a little bigger platform than the next [person], then my responsibility should be to stand up for those principles. If I was in construction or working in an office I should stand up for those principles as well.”

  29. 65 Teo Bear May 6, 2011 at 9:33 am


    The most important element is not that his father was a bigamist or his parents were unmarried. What is important is that his father recognized him as his son. If his father did not recognize him then BHO Jr.’ citizenship would not have been under the control of BNA of 1948. However, since his father did recognize him as his son, proven by several acts and statements by BHOSr. and this gave the BNA of 1948 the legitimacy embraced BHOJr. as British subject. It does not matter one wife or ten, married or unmarried, BHOSr. accepted BHOJr. as his legitimate son and thus his (BHOJr.) inheritance was to be afford the title of a subject of Her Britannic Majesty.

    All I can say is that this new twist is pathetic, I wish the OWH and Obots would use critical thinking instead of politically correct thinking, then it might be a challenge.

    • 66 drkate May 6, 2011 at 9:46 am

      Teo, thank you. I updated my post to include your entire comment. This is extremely treacherous right now and our path must be clear and principled.

    • 67 Alex May 6, 2011 at 3:52 pm

      Thanks for posting that, Teo. My husband keeps saying that he thought there was some British law that made BO ineligible, but I couldn’t remember it off the top of my pointy little head :-).

      So, in my estimation, Barry is NOT a dual citizen, since he was born in Kenya AND his mom couldn’t convey U. S. citizenship to Soebarkah because of his age. So he is just a British citizen.

      Cheerio, pip pip, we have a Brit running the country, what? I’m sure this is what our founding fathers and mothers intended, what they fought so hard for, and what our soldiers die for every day.

  30. 68 sky May 6, 2011 at 9:50 am

    robbing the bank too many times thepost&email

  31. 69 anonymouse May 6, 2011 at 9:53 am

    Oh I SEE…

    first the misdirection was on the birth certificate (place of birth), and so ‘WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE’ was BOGUS

    next was misdirection on parent’s birthplace (so they could argue lots of POTUS-s had parents not born in the USA)…no, it’s parental citizenship that is the crux, and so attacking Trump whose mom was born in Scotland was BOGUS (because she became a naturalized US Citizen prior to his birth)…

    next the misdirection was on acquired citizenship at birth (whether BHO was legitimate or not), and so ‘BORN A BRIT NOT LEGIT’ IS BOGUS because again, it’s a strawman, the crux is and only is whether his father was a US Citizen prior to Obama’s birth…

    well whoop dee frickin doo, we are being led to the STRAWMAN SLAUGHTER yet again

    Those who promote “born a brit not legit’ are setting up a strawman which ironically Geller is helping to shoot down.

    The Law of Nations does not say anything except


    and that is supported by Wong, Minor, Elg, Bingham and OBAMA!!

    Don’t fall for the Brit trick!

    • 70 drkate May 6, 2011 at 10:07 am

      No, the Born a Brit is NOT a trick

      No matter where Obama was born, no matter whether his father was absent or not, he was born with british citizenship.

      • 71 anonymouse May 6, 2011 at 10:15 am

        Well not so fast there, because the BNA 1948 does not confer British citizenship to illegitimate children.

        That would be why they sent out this JUICY yet clearly doctored (Ann went to UW not WSU) immigration report on BHO, Sr. Give us something to feast on which ultimately doesn’t do anything but help their strawman case. Certainly if BHO had British citizenship, as he states, that counters the founders intent…but The Law of Nations is clear

        born in-country of parents who are its citizens

        and makes no mention as to the acquired citizenship of the offspring, etc.

        I think Pamela Barnett’s point resonates because of BNA and circumstances and again, to keep the eyes off the tiger which is Article II’s real definition.

        • 72 drkate May 6, 2011 at 10:19 am

          And not so fast yourself either.

          We have no proof that obama was illegitimate…so I wouldn’t go there. Pam Geller believes this that he is illegitimate. I do not.

          And the discussion of illegitimacy or not is a red herring and a distraction. Obama created his story and he will have to live with it. Born in US to a foreign father.

          Not a natural born citizen.

          • 73 anonymouse May 6, 2011 at 11:17 am

            I agree, if there’s a divorce decree, he was married, and in Kenya (then UKC) it would have been legitimate since polygamy was allowed by the British government in areas where it was practiced.

            However, they’re trying to disarm this by purporting illegitimacy and sympathy over Obama not being able to “help” that.

  32. 75 Tenacity May 6, 2011 at 10:17 am

    Edgar Steele found guilty on all 4 counts in Boise. Sad day when a jury of your peers are so brain-soiled or stacked with gov agents that they enforce a lie against a patriot. Another political prisoner…when are people ever going to wake up? The alleged victim was the best witness for the defense and Steele is still found guilty. In the mean time, the thief and bomb-making FBI informant is still on the street. Very sad day indeed!

  33. 76 Jane May 6, 2011 at 10:36 am

    Bottom Line:

    WE still do NOT know Who are his TRUE biological parents.

    It could be anyone at this point.

    He could be DNA spliced and diced.

    • 77 drkate May 6, 2011 at 10:37 am

      And, Obama is going to have to live with the story he told. If his true parents are different than what he says, sorry Charlie, game is still up!

    • 78 heather May 6, 2011 at 11:59 am

      Doesn’t matter like Dr Kate says he told the story and it’s his cross to bear now!

      At this point his has admitted that his father was a kenyan which make barry an illegal alien unless he naturalized which I doubt he did. He said it himself–he is a citizen of the world! (what a stupid thing to say)

  34. 80 thinkwell May 6, 2011 at 10:46 am

    The eligibility requirement is “born in-country of parents who are its citizens,” which is perfectly compatible with the disqualifier “born a Brit, not legit.” You seem to be claiming that those who use the second phrase are inadvertently implying that its logical converse would qualify Obama, i.e., “NOT born a Brit, thus legit.” This is a logical fallacy and a false fear on your part.

    However, although the “born a Brit, not legit” statement is true, your statement is more precise and complete. You also bring up an interesting point regarding the (presidential) legitimacy of a bastard. If a person is born without a legal father would that de facto disqualify them as nbC because of a lack of being born to citizen parents? (Obama had a legal putative father, so this question doesn’t apply to him.)

    Note that if the parents were legally married and were citizens, then even if the father died during the pregnancy, the child still is considered born to citizen parents, so an actual living father (or mother, for that matter, who may die just before birth) need not exist. However, if a child is born to no legal putative father at all, then perhaps you are right that that child should be considered ineligible. Hmmm…

    • 81 anonymouse May 6, 2011 at 11:23 am

      interesting points
      I’m just so jaded I consider everything a set up by now

      • 82 drkate May 6, 2011 at 11:26 am

        lol. You aren’t the only one! I am suspicious of everything and everyone!!! 😯

      • 83 heather May 6, 2011 at 11:55 am

        I thought I was the only one who thought that way–glad to know I am not alone.

        We can tell though–just listen to their words very carefully and you will hear exactly what they are saying and planning on doing to us.

        the key is LISTEN VS HEAR!

  35. 84 Noway2no May 6, 2011 at 11:19 am

    I am reminded of the most basic first aid axiom: stop the bleeding, start the breathing then treat for shock. We have now barely, just barely, the chance to stop the bleeding.

    None of the policy issues (or repealing anything) will matter if a usurper remains in the people’s house. Repealing any “law” (they are not law since they were signed by a usurper) or stopping his efforts will be made superfluous if the poser-in-chief’s true history is made public. The depth and breath of this crime is staggering and we all must not rest until the truth is known. I don’t care if careers (read Rush Limbaugh or all of the other supposed patriots) are ruined or what the mooching class does. I personally will participate in the razing of this country rather than compromise on the issue of eligibility and election fraud!

    If we do not see this through this country will cease to exist anyway. The fraud will continue and our enemies will be even more brazen and brutal. As a matter of fact I am sure that it is already happening. Exhibit A: Harry Reid’s “reelection”, that election was stolen in broad daylight. If we want more of the same all we need to do is compromise with evil.

    There is no other path; we must stop the bleeding then we can start the breathing.

    If it takes 50 years we must get the truth out so that we write an accurate history of this time to serve as a warning to future generations.

    That warning: Be ever vigilant, freedom is not free and there are always people willing to steal it from you.

  36. 85 Constitution_matters May 6, 2011 at 11:24 am

    This is a very informative website; so many people with so much knowledge of the law and Constitution. I only heard about after the release of this so called long form thing.

  37. 87 usapatriots-shout May 6, 2011 at 11:46 am

    Obama’s Ineligibility Is America’s #1 Crisis

    The following information was emailed to me May 5, 2011. It is the argument Dr. Orly Taitz and Attorney Gary Kreep presented to the California 9th ciruit court regarding the concept of “standing” and the fact that Barry Sotoero is not eligible to be president and must be removed.

    This issue is the number one crisis of America. Until this issue is resolved once and for all, no other vital American problem can be resolved. I am publishing this in full in the spirit that some readers will follow the suggestions of this letter.

    Citizen Demand Letters – Package for
    Week # 1 (Target = 9th Circuit, in CA):

    This single Instructions page + a five page Letter attached.
    (A weekly series of citizen letters demanding strict federal laws are obeyed in removing Obama)
    Visit for another Week’s package to download/use.
    Cost involved: Free to $1 Est. time to completion: 5-15 minutes, depending upon skill level


    1 – Large numbers of citizens, like you, [mail/fax/email] this to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals with recent May 2nd oral arguments held in its own Obama eligibility case.

    2 – The Plaintiffs’ attorneys, Taitz and Kreep, are copied with this case-busting ammo.

    3 – Obama, who lacks ‘natural born’ status, is actually removed from office, and soon.


    (A) Choose ONE of the following to send your Letter to the three Court officers listed:
    – Preferred method: Print one (1) copy of the five-page Letter, sign and date it, and send it in any regular-sized business envelope, with one regular postage stamp upon it, addressed to:

    Cathy A. Catterson, Alex Kozinski, and Molly Dwyer
    U.S. Courts and Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    P.O. Box 193939
    San Francisco, CA 94119-3939

    – Alternate method: Fax a copy of the five-page Letter, with your signature and date upon it already, to only ONE of the following fax numbers, please:

    Fax to Ms. Catterson and Mr. Kozinski at: (415) 355-8901 (San Francisco)
    Fax to Ms. Dwyer at: (415) 355-8551 (San Francisco)
    Fax to the Clerk’s Office at Pasadena: (626) 229-7462 (Pasadena)
    – Alternate method: Compose a new email/webmail message, please give it an exact subject line of “Regarding case 09-56827” (no quotes), address it to, and then, starting at “Dear Officials, Judges, and Staff of the Ninth Circuit:”, simply copy and paste the rest of the Letter’s complete text into your message body, and send your message.

    (B) Send a copy to Dr. Orly Taitz, via email (, OR by fax: (949) 766-7603

    (C) Send a copy to Gary G. Kreep, via email (, OR by fax: (760) 788-6414

    (D) Send a copy to the DOJ Attorneys, (, OR fax: (213) 894-7819

    (E) Tell everyone else you want to tell… friends, patriots, other officials, media, etc., etc.
    To: Cathy A. Catterson, Circuit & Court of Appeals Executive
    Office of the Circuit Executive U.S. Courts for the Ninth Circuit Molly Dwyer, Clerk of Court
    P.O. Box 193939 Office of the Clerk
    San Francisco, CA 94119-3939 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    (415) 355-8800 fax: (415) 355-8901 P.O. Box 193939
    San Francisco, CA 94119-3939
    Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge (415) 355-8000 fax: (415) 355-8551
    Office of the Circuit Executive
    U.S. Courts for the Ninth Circuit Clerk’s Office, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
    P.O. Box 193939 125 South Grand Avenue
    San Francisco, CA 94119-3939 Pasadena, CA 91105
    (415) 355-8800 fax: (415) 355-8901 (626) 229-7250 fax: (626) 229-7462
    Cc: Dr. Orly Taitz and Mr. Gary Kreep, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs;
    Mr. David DeJute and Mr. Roger West, Attorneys for the Defendants;
    Other interested citizens, groups, and entities, both public and private.
    Re: Express mandates of the United States Code *require* a forced conclusion in this case

    Dear Officials, Judges, and Staff of the Ninth Circuit:

    We, as American citizens, know you will duly provide complete notice of the contents herein to the panel of judges who were assigned to hear the oral arguments on May 2nd in Pasadena within the constitutional-crisis case of Wiley Drake, et al v. Barack Obama, et al, Docket No. 09-56827.

    Because mandates of express federal law *absolutely require* the Plaintiffs to win their primary objective (regardless of any arguments raised), your panel’s sole remaining duties are: to rule in their favor accordingly; and to grant all relief that is necessarily essential and subsequent thereto.

    If the panel’s ruling does not comply with these mandates of law, then you could be called into constitutional ethics questions, for failing, ignoring, or otherwise neglecting to relay these same commanding authorities to your own fellow employees, within such an historic judiciary issue as this one – wherein several federal judges have already revealed their treasonous contempt and utter disdain for our Constitution, and for the People’s clear right to assure a lawful Presidency. So, then, the following are amongst the absolutely mandatory requirements of law in play herein: Title 44, Chapter 22, of the United States Code, entitled as “Presidential Records”, clarifies and mandates, inter alia, that:

    [1] each of the sought records from Mr. Obama aka Soetoro having probative value as evidence to determine his constitutional eligibility, or not.., to the Office of President is declared by express federal law as a “Presidential record”;
    [2] all such “Presidential records” are now entirely and wholly owned by the United States, and not by Mr. Obama aka Soetoro anymore; [3] no such “Presidential records” may ever be concealed under any form of privacy whatsoever; and [4] the same records are required to be freely available, public domain.

    2 This is because the repeated statutory key phrase – “the carrying out of constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President” – obviously includes the duty of Mr. Obama aka Soetoro to qualify himself AS the ostensibly-eligible President. Indeed, it is actually a mandated legal duty of Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, AS “President”, to personally make sure that his real birth certificate, and other such constitutional eligibility documentation, were put into the freely available public domain upon his very first day in assuming the Office of the Presidency.

    Rephrasing the question against Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, it is mere child’s play to point out the obvious statutory mandates of the United States Code in control of the entire matter, e.g.:

    [1] that all of Barack’s same such records of constitutional-eligibility importance are expressly not protected to any privacy, whatsoever, 44 U.S.C. § 2204(c); further, that
    [2] Barack does not even own those records, anymore, because, as ‘President’, they are now owned solely by the United States, 44 U.S.C. § 2202; and even further, that [3] Barack’s duty under law, mandated, has always been to ensure those same records are made public domain and freely available for the daily reviewing by any citizen, see 44 U.S.C. §§ 2203(a) and 2204(c), then 5 U.S.C. § 552.

    Ironically also, by the very operation and direct effect of these statutes, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro therefore necessarily has no legal bases or claims or interests or rights, whatsoever, to continue concealing “Presidential records” which now belong only to ‘We The People’, until he would first prove his own authentic U.S. citizenship of any level, thereby establishing a citizen portion of legal ownership to such records – by first revealing the same records as proof of citizenship…This is a classic “Catch-22”, of course, but, in fact, the entire worldwide topic of *where* Mr. Obama aka Soetoro was born becomes instantly and legally irrelevant and moot in the face of the indisputable fact that he simply can never be constitutionally eligible as a valid “President” under
    the “natural born” clause, because one parent (his daddy) never had U.S. citizenship of any level.

    To act as a federal judge with enough legal knowledge to obtain one of the higher positions upon any Circuit Court of Appeals, yet behave as if without understanding regarding the ‘natural born’ clause as it relates to requiring two (2) citizen parents, is to also conclusively reveal far too much incompetence and disdain for the law, to remain in such an important position of the public trust.

    The three (3) different levels of U.S. citizenship are established. They include “natural born”, “native born”, and “naturalized” citizens. For example, Stanley Ann(e) Dunham/Soetoro, the mother of Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, was originally a full “natural born” citizen, herself, being conceived by two existing U.S. citizens (her parents) who were also both still U.S. citizens at her birth. In full contrast, the father of Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, Barack Sr., was never a U.S. citizen of any level, whatsoever, as the world knows. As a direct consequence, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, himself, i.e., the currently-sitting “President”, can never be “natural born” as is constitutionally required for Presidency, but only “native born” or “naturalized”, as second or third best levels of U.S. itizenship. The secondary level, “native born”, is what the birth certificate issue is all about, as if born in Hawaii, Obama would be at least “native born” on U.S. soil (if mommy had been back on U.S. soil for at least 6 months prior to birth, which she apparently had not been..), but still never “natural born”, again, because daddy was not *also* a U.S. citizen before Barry’s birth, and never was, as is admitted by everyone. Even “native born”, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro would have still automatically lost his any (doubtful) citizenship with the U.S., when his mommy took him to foreign lands that were on our State Department’s no-no lists, and enrolled little Barry as a new *citizen* there in order to attend their schools, such as when they lived in Indonesia. Returning to the U.S. later, his mommy *might* have tried to get them both “naturalized” as immigrants or returning ex-citizens obtaining/re-obtaining their U.S. citizenship, but did she do that each time they left for foreign lands and later came back? This is problematic at best. Furthermore, later in life as a young adult, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro himself took up his own residencies in the same manner, against our State Department’s rules in effect at the time,
    like when he lived in Pakistan, etc. Once again, having automatically had his any existing (doubtful) citizenship cancelled each time, any return back to living in the United States again would necessitate re-initializing the “naturalization” or “re-naturalization” level of citizenship, because his any true “native born” level of U.S. citizenship (the “Hawaii birth or not” issue) was
    long gone lost, anyway, when Barry and mommy kept moving back and forth around the world to bad places. It is seriously doubtful that Mr. Obama aka Soetoro has any *valid* naturalization status, which is the ONLY possible citizenship level he COULD have left now (the 3rd level), since his any native born (2nd level) is automatically long gone lost, and – to the simplest point -he never even had the required 1st level of citizenship, “natural born”, to be lawful President, in the first place, because daddy was never *also* a U.S. citizen, and also a U.S. citizen before little Barry was born… wherever Obama was born. Mr. Obama aka Soetoro is *not* a lawful U.S. President, and never was. There is absolutely no possible way he ever could be legally valid.

    The law on this critical subject is far too well established, for literally hundreds of years now, and in multiple formats all applying directly to the ultimate and inevitable conclusion – without having both of his parents as U.S. citizens (of any citizenship level), and that as prior to his birth, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro simply is not, and never was, lawfully eligible for the U.S. Presidency,and must be removed from Office, as expediently as possible by at least one of the legal methods available under the Constitution, and replaced with the most properly-eligible person under law.

    Heck, even your own online Ninth Circuit website “Vacancy Announcements” for employment of court personnel include these standard conditions of all employment roles (emphasis added):


    Must be a U.S. citizen or a citizen of a country with a defense treaty with the U.S. who is eligible to work in the U.S. Positions with the U.S. Courts are excepted service appointments. Excepted service appointments are at
    will and can be terminated with or without cause by the Court. Employees will be hired provisionally pending the results of a background investigation and fingerprinting, and are subject to a probationary period.

    Direct deposit of pay required.

    It doesn’t matter that “President” Chester A. Arthur got away with this exact same fraud over a hundred years ago, when his own father was still not a U.S. citizen at the time of Chester’s birth. (Chester’s father got “naturalized” after Chester’s birth, and Chester also allowed and/or helped his own “birther” issue to distract from the true issue – lack of “natural born” status.) The only matter of importance relevant to that prior experience, now, is that, obviously, the entire Federal Government has miserably failed the American people again, and should probably be held liable. Moreover, knowledgeable American citizens are tired of the treasonous fraud being committed by the U.S. Department of Justice attorneys defending Mr. Obama aka Soetoro in all these cases.

    4 Pursuant to further expressly-written mandates of federal statutes, neither Mr. Eric Holder, the current United States Attorney General, nor any of his US/DOJ staff attorneys (“U.S. Attorneys” and/or “U.S. Assistant Attorneys”) are ever allowed to even consider defending Mr. Obama aka Soetoro in these situations. It is an absolutely preposterous and outrageously criminal conflict of interest for any of these people to actually try to defend him in these matters, at any time, ever.

    Under all the relevant statutes of the United States Code pertaining to any of the possible terms involved, i.e., “oath”, “naturalization”, “loyalty”, “eligibility”, “citizenship”, “nationality”, and etc., the U.S. Attorney General and his U.S. DOJ staff of attorneys must avoid representation in defense for any government official or employee who is embroiled by legal issues falling under one of those similar terms, precisely because they are required by law to *investigate* and *prosecute* against any such people on U.S. soil with raised issues of potential alien nationality or illegal immigration. See, many individual federal statutes like 8 U.S.C. § 1103 and etc., but generally the whole of Chapters 12 (“Immigration and Nationality”) and 13 (“Immigration and Naturalization Service”) under Title 8 of the U.S. Code, remembering that this entire INS agency is a sub-component of the U.S. Department of Justice, a law enforcement agency. See, 8 § 1551. In particular, Mr. Eric Holder and his US/DOJ staff have *always* been – ever since the various “eligibility” cases had first originated – absolutely duty bound to start a criminal investigation against “President” Obama regarding these issues, pursuant to express mandate of 28 USC § 591, because not only is the US/DOJ in charge of, and responsible for, these immigration/foreigner issues within America and its various political offices, but, in having multitudes of direct legal documentation/evidence served upon them – multiple times, by multiple “birther” attorneys, in the direct due course of multiple legal proceedings – Mr. Eric Holder, along with “the usual suspects” (a small group of the same US Attorneys who have been routinely defending Obama over and over in these different eligibility cases), are also each already and intimately familiar with the sheer mountain of fraud involved by Obama, i.e., they know that Mr. Obama aka Soetoro is currently engaged in multiple forms of Obstruction of Justice – well more than enough to trigger the express mandate of 28 USC § 591 to criminally investigate him… NOT defend him!

    Not only should the panel of this Court sua sponte strike all pleadings and other filings made by the US/DOJ attorneys from the record on appeal, and give Summary Judgment to the Plaintiffs at both levels of proceedings, it also appears, that from committing such onerous conflicts of interest and also affirmatively assisting Mr. Obama aka Soetoro in continuing to defraud all of America, that either Attorney General Eric Holder, himself, and/or also these same Government attorneys herein, are now also subject to immediate removal from their offices, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 528, 530B and 547. They were *required* to prosecute, not defend!! Next, any “mere” citizen has expressly-provided jurisdiction AND standing to directly sue over these matters, under variety of statutory authority, e.g., 2 U.S.C. § 437h, 5 U.S.C. §§ 702 & 706, 26 U.S.C. § 9011, 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg-9 and etc. Jurisdiction and “mere” citizen standing can be *also* achieved through foundational Constitutional authority, e.g., using Art. IV, Sec. 2, Clause

    1 (equal privileges and immunities of citizens), and/or Art. IV, Sec. 4 (guaranteed form of government), and/or Art. VI, Clause 3 (President required to support Constitution by oath or affirmation), Amend. I (petition for redress), Amend. IX (no denying rights of people), Amend. X (powers reserved to people), and/or Amend. XIV, Sec. 1 (no denying equal protection of law).

    5 In reverse summary, therefore, these are among the mandated results of expressly-written federal statutes in ANY and ALL of the eligibility cases out there filed against Mr. Obama aka Soetoro: Any “mere” citizen has not just one, but, in fact, multiple statutory authorities to provide him or her with clear jurisdiction and standing over these issues, in one way or another;

    From the very first “eligibility” case filed into the federal court system, Attorney General Eric Holder and his crew of US/DOJ Attorneys were *required* to prosecute Mr. Obama aka Soetoro, and *never* allowed to defend him, ever – All of their pleadings in all of these many cases are *required* to be stricken from the records, but we can skip that, if
    they will just DO their mandated jobs, now, and initiate the criminal prosecution(s); The Plaintiffs are absolutely entitled, as a matter of law, to obtain the various records that they seek for disclosure from Mr. Obama aka Soetoro to either prove or disprove his any eligibility for the Presidency – Not only are they entitled to an outstanding, “landslide” Summary Judgment in their favor, anyway, but these “Presidential Records” are required to be public domain, regardless, already, and it was/is Obama’s job to ensure that is done;
    Even though Plaintiffs are absolutely entitled to one of their primary objectives, which is obtaining all those records to finally prove the actual place of birth, ALL of that is STILL totally irrelevant, in the end, because of higher, clear-cut “natural born” requirements; Because Mr. Obama aka Soetoro never had BOTH of his parents as (any level of) U.S. citizens, he cannot legally have ever been, and certainly is not, a *valid* President; and, Accordingly, Mr. Obama aka Soetoro absolutely must, by law, be removed from Office.

    We, as American citizens, are nauseated by seeing all three Branches of our Federal Government actually “running cover” in the largest conspiracy of modern times, to defraud the entire world by treasonous, syndicate protections of an obviously-ineligible Impostor inside our White House. However, we also understand that there may be undue influences involved. Regardless, though, it is high time for the Judiciary Branch to show a little backbone against the other Branches, and stand up for the obvious truth of things, that much of America also sees painfully well. It is time for the Judiciary Branch to regain a healthy amount of energizing respect it has lost in past years, and it is time for Members of the Judiciary Branch to give the Constitution back to their children. Removing the aux ‘President’ should present no fear when the replacement solutions are guided by law, itself. Because the language of the 12th Amendment necessarily provides actual separate election campaigns by Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates, or else the various ‘distinct’ phrases become pointless and meritless (for there would never be any need for “counting rules” to distinguish between vote totals that were always the same for both “running mates”), it is most reasonably likely that Sarah Palin would have, in fact, won the Vice-Presidency on her own over Biden’s any competing campaign, and that she would now be the currently sitting Vice-President alongside Mr. Obama aka Soetoro. Whether Palin or Biden should “best” be there now, Speaker Boehner advances behind as new Vice-President. In the only alternative, the 12th Amendment should be struck down for perverting the original, profitable re-blending of two parties into our White House, every four years, into the pendulum system swinging our Nation even further and further apart, every four years. In that solution, the original selection process yields McCain and Nader, as next top vote-getters, who become President and Vice-President. Choose one solution.
    Sign Date

    • 88 sky May 6, 2011 at 1:16 pm

      the constitution has been chipped away at,things added,some taken away,income tax never ratified,the corrupt FED,It is the federalist papers that are important.

  38. 89 Jan E. May 6, 2011 at 11:47 am

    I am sort of new here but thought you all
    would like to read a board called
    Expose Obama, which has these fascinating
    articles today:

    One is about Obama’s secret “Transgenders” meeting
    in the White House. It mentions that one of his
    appointees is a man turned into a woman.

    The other is about the 475 Taliban prisoners
    that escaped through a tunnel in Afghanistan

    • 90 heather May 6, 2011 at 12:57 pm

      Oh what a slap in our faces–one more right taken from us and given to the fakes–first afirmative action forever with the reparations included forever for blacks and Am Indians, then the gays dont ask dont tell–now this one, which caters directly to transgenders and my gosh, we better watch our tongue–one single word out of place and we are in court being slammed. And of course he allows his czars to write this law–this is unconstitutional as hell. Get those fat a$$ congress men and women off their fat butts and demand the arrest of this basta$D.

  39. 92 Bones May 6, 2011 at 11:58 am

    OT I wonder if any of the people mentioned at the bottom of this article would be interested in Susan Daniels’ findings:

    • 93 Alex May 6, 2011 at 6:09 pm

      I like this part:

      “…charged with making a false statement in their passport application; making a false claim of U.S. citizenship; and using a fraudulent social security number.”

      If only it said “Obama/Soetoro/Whatever was…”!

  40. 95 anonymouse May 6, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    from a posting on CFP
    “Some Simple Questions and Answers
    Based on the person in questions own testimony and documentation provided, such as it is:
    Could the person in question legally have lived in London England had they so chosen too? – YES
    Could the person in question legally voted in British elections? – YES
    Could the person in question served in the British armed forces? – YES
    Could the person in question legally stand for election to the British Parliament? – YES
    Can anyone who legally meets all of the above challenges in the affirmative serve as President or Vice President of the United States?
    Ha, ha, ha – NOT A CHANCE”

  41. 96 Jane May 6, 2011 at 1:56 pm

    Heather, you could be my close relative….LOL…we think alike!

    • 99 Alex May 6, 2011 at 6:33 pm

      So maybe from now on we should show emphasis on the word “born” in teh phrase “natural *born* citizen”! 😉

      I think Obama gave the Churchhill bust back in a misguided, idiotic attempt to distance himself from what he knew was a deal-breaker: his British citizenship. But such a weak, rude gesture would only make a difference in his addled mind.

      Those nesting dolls at the bottom that are labeled with his allegiances are actually mislabeled. They should say “Me, me, me, me, me”!

      • 100 drkate May 6, 2011 at 6:42 pm

        There is a trap on “born”… the phrase must always be ‘natural born citizen’, which is different than a ‘born citizen’, and ‘citizen’. See Apuzzo’s site for that very topic, nbc does not equal born citizen! 🙂

        • 101 Alex May 7, 2011 at 4:15 am

          Oh, I was just referring to John Jay’s letter to Washington in your link. But you’re absolutely right – they should never be broken up:


          Hey, a new bumper sticker campaign:

          Got Natural Born Citizen?

          I don’t see that anywhere else on the nets!

  42. 102 Born in Texas May 6, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    The defacto BHO policy regarding his illegitimacy is to confuse and delay, muddy the water and then distract with a false flag. He is counting on his opposition being spread out, weak, and not highly organized. He is counting on repubs being their usual wishy washy middle of the road, pull-their-punches weak politicians. So far, his strategy seems to be working.

    What is needed is an “organization” that is 100% dedicated to exposing BHO as a fraud and documenting the complicity of the LMS and politicians. Someone needs to be taking names and aligning up charges for the time when there is a political will to do something. This organization would need the backing of several high profile politicians. There should be several spokespersons that can go on TV shows, the internet, etc. and present the information clearly and without emotion. This organization would need financial support and would be the target of all kinds of disinformation and treachery. This organization could also target other elected officials and vet them as being citizens, and fit for office. I think it is time the public is given more accurate information about those running for office. I really think this type of organization is viable, any takers?

    • 103 anonymouse May 6, 2011 at 2:35 pm

      Sure, there’s a bunch of patriot orgs that need to consolidate. Why don’t we hire a community organizer? LOL That’s what’s needed here!

  43. 104 charlesmountain May 6, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    Trump will be with Steve Malzberg on Monday, WOR NY at 4pm.
    I think that’s when the fireworks will start, leading up to the Corsi’s book release. It will be surreal.

  44. 105 heather May 6, 2011 at 7:17 pm

    OT-let’s hope this isn’t the beginning of their haarp madrid EQ.

  45. 107 sky May 6, 2011 at 7:34 pm

    obama’s union drops the mask & goes full commie

    • 108 Troy May 6, 2011 at 8:33 pm

      On the night that Obama was sElected, I told all of my friends and family that we had just officially fallen under communist rule….They all thought I was overreacting….Now they all know!

      Why can some, seemingly intelligent, people see things so clearly while others are completely blind?

  46. 109 heather May 6, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    Alex Jones is saying they are planning a huge false flag soon very soon. I’m thinking since they blew the levees in MO and allowed the Ms River to flood everywhere, now is the time for the New Madrid EQ. Just a heads up to keep your eyes and ears open–election time coming up and barry will refuse to lose.

  47. 110 Starla May 7, 2011 at 2:27 pm




    ©2011 WorldNetDaily
    May 06, 2011


    “It may have been “Morning in America” during Ronald Reagan’s presidency, but under Barack Obama life is becoming a blinding fog. What is real and what is not? One week, polls show most Americans think Obama is a liar, his popularity reaching an all-time low. The next week, his ratings skyrocket on news that terror kingpin Osama bin Laden has been killed.

    But as the modern entertainment medium called “news” switches gears from week to week, lurching from story to story, what is really going on underneath it all?

    For tens of millions of Americans, what is going on is the destruction of the greatest nation in history, whose morals and money are both in freefall and whose politics have been steered maniacally leftward under Obama. They see their legendary liberty, prosperity and sovereignty evaporating into the mist of an advancing new global order where America and Americans are being intentionally diminished in every conceivable way.

    Realizing they’re being deceived and misled constantly by both their government and the elite media, they’re doing two things simultaneously: Preparing themselves and their families for hard times, and organizing and working as diligently as possible to save their troubled country.”


    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Comments are currently closed.

May 2011

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: