Contempt for Civilization

©2011 drkate

What initially stunned me about Obama was his contempt for America.  And through these years, it is evident how much the left disdains America…and then we find that this is the strategy to get us to hate ourselves.

The war for America’s culture is on.

Open thread!

66 Responses to “Contempt for Civilization”


  1. 1 drkate July 2, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    This is the most insidious part of what has happened to our country by the left, used by the bankers. Notice he calls the tea party a ‘holding action’, I think this is true.

    But we are at that point where it is time to walk into Mordor. No more conferences, no more lawsuits. The time for pitchforks and other tools draws near.

    • 2 deafy2 July 2, 2011 at 6:29 pm

      Is there anything written, a transcript, maybe? I am deaf, and a patriot … I’m lost here … whatever is said here is completely lost on me

      all I know is that Obama is an usurper, an enemy agent out for our destruction, and there is a plenty of people helping him do it.

      http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=317693 … pay attention in particular the actions of Congress and others in the years before Obama moved into the White House.

      What does that indicate to you?

      Personally, I think Obama is very happy that our attention is diverted on those “side issues” so that he can damage us even worse … like with Clinton’s ongoing anti-gun actions at UN, Democrat’s recent cry for further gun laws, actions against Israel, private chats with Muslim Brotherhood, and so on and on.

      Go for Obama and all those traitors, and the rest of them will behave!

      • 3 drkate July 2, 2011 at 6:33 pm

        If you go to youtube and view it (double click on the youtube insignia), there might be a link for a transcript…or you could comment on the video and see if they will provide one. the gist of this is that “Mordor” (usgovernment) is pouring poison cultural gas on us, and we must walk into Mordor and stop it.

        The second video I posted…try the same thing. This is a series of how the banksters took over, and then discusses an act passed in the early 80’s that may pave the way back for our country (part 3 of the series).

        • 4 deafy2 July 2, 2011 at 6:49 pm

          OK, appreciate the feedback …
          can you just give me the url for the one at youtube? … I am using Linux, and there is nothing except for a black box staring at me, a problem with the SWF 9 & 10 that I am trying to fix … (I do fine at Youtube, but not here and lots of articles online gave me that same blankity blank that frustrates me …
          needless to say, Obama frustrates me a heck a lot more. thanks for helping … now the url? anyone?

    • 7 anonymouse July 2, 2011 at 7:21 pm

      Well I’m for leafleting, or graffiti…what war zone doesn’t have a good share of graffiti? They are at war against Americans.

    • 8 Starla July 3, 2011 at 11:38 am

      An Very Excellent Comment that I agree with.

      From:
      http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=23383#comments

      “Carl Manning
      July 1st, 2011 @ 8:38 pm

      With so much corruption in the federal courts, I have to wonder why it appears that no lawyers have tried to sue Obama in the State courts for perjury when he signed State records, which is precisely what happened when Obama signed State documents stating he was qualified to be on the State ballots. Obama didn’t just violate federal laws; he, Pelosi, and the Democrat National Committee committed perjury to all 50 Secretaries of State. The most problematic of these perjuries for Obama with the best chance of passing “technical legalese” muster in State court would be the statements he signed for the States of Arizona and, of course, Hawaii.

      The federal government at all levels and in all departments is so hopelessly corrupt and devoid of statesmen that I honestly believe it is a waste of time to expect any justice from any of them. The federal government, at this juncture with so much systemic corruption, being the criminal cabal that it is of leviathan proportions, can only be redeemed or dissolved by the States through hardball tactics of nullification, establishment of State militias per the Constitutional prerogative – answerable to only the Governor of the State, a clandestine “unannounced” Constitutional Convention for the express purpose of the formation of a new federal government and dissolution of the current one by Conservative Governors and/or State legislatures.

      Nullification is useless if a State allows the federal courts to strike down any law it passes to nullify nullification, which is always the case. Nullification needs to be followed with threats of State prosecution of federal officials trying to enforce anything not within the federal government’s Constitutional authority. The way so many States have been handling nullification lately only shows they haven’t the spine for putting any teeth into it.

      State militias of the Constitutional variety (NOT THE NATIONAL GUARDS) send a clear message to DC that the States will enforce their sovereign border security if the federal government refuses to do so. States have a sovereign right to protect their own citizens from all enemies foreign and doemstic as well. In fact, I would like to see non-border States who have been overrun with illegal immigration work in conjunction with their sister border States sending supplementary State militia troops to the border to relieve other State troops and provide added firepower if needed. The State militias can work in conjunction with each other without the federal government if that federal government is a danger to their security. This will send a clear message to DC that the States mean business.

      To follow proper protocol, the clandestine Constitutional Convention of Conservative States ONLY should be preceded, at first, by a letter jointly signed by all State Governors, State House Speakers, and State Representatives listing the usurpations of the federal government just as our forefathers pleaded with the Crown. It should demand a plan of action by the federal government to address the numerous usurpations. It should demand a response within one week to the charges. When no such reply or an inadequate response is received, a 2nd Declaration of Independence (COMPLETE NULLIFICATION)should be jointly signed by all parties previously mentioned. After these formalities of protocol, the clandestine Constitutional Convention of Conservative States should be held at which time a new federal government is to be planned with concomitant Articles of Secession from the existing dysfunctional Union that has only served to threaten the survival of the Sovereign States; that has outlived its usefulness by threatening the economic solvency of the American People; and that apparently no longer intends to honor the Compact it made with the Several States many years ago known as the Constitution.”

  2. 9 drkate July 2, 2011 at 5:54 pm

    Long but very good video, h/t sky

    • 10 Jan July 4, 2011 at 3:51 pm

      Great videos, thanks Sky. I’m amazed that some things are still kind of far out there, like the clones, but we have talked several times about obat the clone.
      These should be mandatory for 8th and 12th graders in order to graduate and required for each year of college so they don’t forget.

  3. 11 anonymouse July 2, 2011 at 7:19 pm

    They admit they needed to INSTALL marxism, it did not fall into place after capitalism peaked, as Karl had predicted…so they decided it was Western civilization that needed to be torn down.

    They would throw everything at it, even if it came from illogical tangents, such as using homosexual rights to destabilize the family while pushing islam which (though all muslim men are gay and pedophiles but with STRICT RULES) punishes gays who don’t do it right…etc.

    Hate on christianity, hate on family, hate on pro-GENDER, hate against gender, hate on houses, on cars, on energy, on flags, on patriotism, on rule of law hate on constitution hate on founders hate on whites hate on blacks who are conservatives hate on MEXICANS who are conservatives, hate on anything western…hate loathe disdain contempt, whine bitch complain…

    they actually think that by tearing down what is good, they can prop up their disgusting (170 million dead in past 100 years from socialism) evil and most of all ROBUSTLY STUPID AND PROVEN FAIL system of socialism/marxism….

    The Solution: DISH IT RIGHT BACK AND EXPOSE THEIR AGENDA.

    They want to kill christians? Calll them out on it! They want to impose sharia on homosexuals in the USA? Call them out on it! They want to abolish womens rights with sharia? Call them out on it!

  4. 14 Ann July 2, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    OT but WOW

    Tea Party Takes On Eligilibity Issue! This is HUGE!!!!

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/07/breaking-big-deal-news-tea-party-nation.html

  5. 16 charlesmountain July 3, 2011 at 5:11 am

    Complete Full WND Presser

  6. 17 Hotlanta Mike July 3, 2011 at 6:00 am

    Clarice in good form today:

    The Community Organizer Who Would be King

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/the_community_organizer_who_would_be_king.html

  7. 18 Alex July 3, 2011 at 6:27 am

    I’m just going to start by commenting on your opening line, Kate.

    I was a Yellow Dog Democrat when all this started (2008). For those who don’t know what that means, well, I’d vote for a yellow dog before I’d vote for anyone but a Democrat.

    But when I got through researching Obama, and seeing what he was all about, and it came down to brass tacks, I actually voted for McCain! Here’s what started me on that path.

    Because of Obama’s 2004 Democratic Convention speech, I thought he was possibly a good guy, and a good future candidate. He talked about there being a coming together of blue states and red states, and that was very appealing.

    When 2008 rolled around, I considered Obama. If he was as good as everyone else, it was past time for an African American to get a chance run this country. That could also be said of a woman, but I thought that Hillary would be horribly, unfairly harrassed to no end if she won, and throughout her term.

    But in the first debate I saw, it was very evident that there was something wrong with Barry. He had this weird, imperious way of tilting his head back to a ridiculous angle and looking at Hillary Clinton with actual hate. I eliminated him quickly. After that came John Edwards. Then I supported Hillary. Obama’s team did every underhanded, illegal thing to throw her from the race. She should have rightly won. But Barry’s team used violence, cheating, lying, bribery, and threats to take the election from her.

    So, relating to the title of your thread, it was his contempt that made me drop support for Obama like the proverbial hot potato. He has contempt for America, Americans, and, the genesis of it all, contempt for himself, because of how he is. He hates himself, and projects that hate onto US!

    The reason I voted for McCain is because (1) he fought for America, and was a hero. And even though I think he’s also beholden to TPTB, McCain loves America, in my opinion. (2) I believed that you should vote, and I knew that Barry “Barack Obama” Soetoro is not even from this country. Period. Everything else aside, why would I vote for a non-American to be president? That’s idiotic and ridiculous, and obviously against this country’s best interests.

    • 19 heather July 3, 2011 at 11:48 am

      I knew barry was evil JUST by his eyes–the eyes are windows to your soul and his eyes tell the story of hatred and evil. No shining light around him what so ever–just pure hate and evil.

      While just listening to his speaking, I was impressed by his verbage, as it sounded right, but when I got my look at him and saw the darkness around him I knew immediately how evil he was.

      That is when I stared my research and investigating of him and knew at that moment he was not a NBC. That is something no one could have come up with–kind of like something right out of a hollywood horror film.

      At that point I told everyone I knew and came in contact with, by email, phone, oral speach, any way I could communicate. Yep–got lots of negative feedback against myself but I knew I was right–100%—no doubt at all.

      Of course I voted McCain/Palin because I am a republican—-and live in a red state and would do it again.

      Remember, one can change the color of their hair, their clothes, their verbage–BUT THE THE WINDOWS TO THEIR SOUL—ALWAYS THE EYES. Listen to your heart and your instincts because they will never fail you.

      • 20 Alex July 4, 2011 at 4:37 am

        How well I remember that feedback, Heather. For a Democrat, it was very bad, as people would imply you were a traitor!

        But here’s what we called ourselves: PUMAs! That stands for “Party Unity My A$$.”🙂

    • 21 attilasdaughter July 3, 2011 at 12:39 pm

      plus the DNC gave the votes of two states to Obama, even though he did not earn them. Highly corrupt and disgusting.
      Hillary actually had more votes than Obama. How democratic to make him the nominee.
      Obama deserves to lose in a landslide, a really historic one!

  8. 23 RacerJim July 3, 2011 at 7:35 am

    Very astute description of Soetoro/Obama/Soebarkah, Alex. In my 68 years on this earth I have never known anyone with anywhere near as much inherant contempt for anyone/anything he disagrees with as Soetoro/Obama/Soebarkah has.

    Taking the 2008 nomination from Hillary Clinton in the manner you described has been his campaign modus-operandis from day one of his political life.

    Even if Soetoro/Obama/Soebarkah is from this country he damn sure is not of, much less for, this country and, as a Vietnam Veteran who voluntarily put my life in harm’s way for this country I have just as much inherant contempt for him as he has for America, Americans and the genesis of it all.

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY AMERICA!

    • 24 Alex July 3, 2011 at 8:56 am

      Thanks so much, Jim, and thank you especially for your service! I respect that more than I can express. Without actions such as yours and John McCain’s, we would not have the freedoms and advantages we have today.

      Soetoro works extremely hard every day to try and tear down this great country, even though it gives him every advantage – that’s what an idiot he is. He does this against his wife, his children, his relatives, his friends, if he has any. Why does Barry work even against his own best interests? Because he is not too bright. And this is the kind of tool that The Powers That Be like.

      And not being a natural born citizen adds another attractive characteristic to TPTB. This man can be blackmailed at every turn to do their bidding.

      Luckily, the rest of us aren’t as mentally challenged. That is why our numbers have swelled and swelled until, I believe, that Birthers number in the millions. And our numbers will continue to grow, as the facts continue to come out. And I would like to pass along an idea to add even more. I’ll be posting about that in a little bit.🙂

  9. 25 drkate July 3, 2011 at 8:06 am

    The racist, hating “pastor”

  10. 26 drkate July 3, 2011 at 8:32 am

    Fourth of July Message from Terry Lakin

    http://www.terrylakinactionfund.com/july4

  11. 27 Katie July 3, 2011 at 9:51 am

    This year, I have made it a personal mission to STOP celebrating the “4th of July” and start celebrating “INDEPENDENCE DAY”. The holiday has been hijacked – as so many important days for America have (Merry Christmas is now Happy Holidays, for example) – and we’ve become accustomed to referring to it as the 4th of July. We don’t have a celebration and national holiday simply because it is July 4th.

    We acknowledge and celebrate INDEPENDENCE Day on the 4th of July. I have spent the last few days sharing this with others, and watching the light bulb go on in their mind.

  12. 30 Katie July 3, 2011 at 9:54 am

    Speaking of contempt for civilization, Greg Goss finds another important video about chemtrails.

    http://gwgjlg.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/chemtrails-are-authorized-by-congress/

    Yesterday, the water service company that delivers water to a huge part of the Denver metro population just sent a letter to their customers warning that high levels of lead have been discovered in testing. But we shouldn’t be alarmed…SAY WHHHAAAATT???

  13. 32 Alex July 3, 2011 at 10:11 am

    I hope I’m not posting too much here, Kate. Please feel free to edit it, if you wish.

    O. k., this is probably one of the most patriotic things you or I could do today! I saw this at Obama Release Your Records Birther Report site. It comes from a poster who calls himself “ProGraphics,” and these words are at his website [http://www.obamafake.bravehost.com/you_can_help.html]:

    (All the following is a quote from the Obamafake website.)

    MONEY TALKS! STAMP – OR WRITE – YOUR OBAMA FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE MESSAGE ON MONEY! IT’S LEGAL! (SEE BELOW)

    BUT IS THIS LEGAL? THE ANSWER IS YES!

    AND, OF COURSE, IT GETS AROUND THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, BECAUSE TO DESTROY THE MESSAGE, YOU HAVE TO DESTROY THE MONEY, WHICH WOULD BE ILLEGAL!

    THE HEAVILY MEDIA COVERED WHERESGEORGE.COM HAS BEEN OPERATING AN ONLINE “GAME” INVOLVING STAMPING MONEY FOR 12 YEARS. IT WAS INVESTIGATED BY THE GOVERNMENT AND NO CHARGES WERE FILED.

    By stamping ‘OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS FAKE,’ you are doing the same thing according to the letter of the law, except what you are doing is even more legal because you are in no way advertising a game or business.

    You must also distribute the money as you would normally – buying things with it – no “bulk distribution.” Where’s George gets no special Gov exemption – this is simply legal on the face of it, as described at Where’s George [http://www.wheresgeorge.com/faq.php].

    So in other words, stamp it so it remains usable and spend it! It’s that simple!

    IN A WEEK HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE WILL SEE EACH MESSAGE!

    IS IT WORTH YOUR TIME?

    Where’s George, The center For Disease Control and others have distribution models that all point to the same thing: a single one dollar bill with OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS FAKE on it will reach hundreds of thousands of people in less than a year! Even a modest effort will make the message seen BILLIONS (WITH A “B”!) OF TIMES BETWEEN NOW AND THE ELECTION OF 2012. That must be worth a few minutes of your time!

    Make your own!

    Staples and Cosco have make-your-owns for under $30.00 (that’s thirty Where’s George’s).

    STAPLES STAMP KIT HERE: http://www.staples.com/2000-PLUS-Custom-Stamp-Kit-with-Wood-Handle/product_614107

    OFFICE MAX STAMP KIT HERE: http://www.officemax.com/office-supplies/stamps-supplies/specialty-stamps/product-prod1730024?sp=true

    Or simply write it by hand. But DO IT!

    Here’s what the Law says, word for word – IT’S LEGAL!

    Basically, it’s only illegal to deface currency with the intention to make it unusable! But we want people to read our message, so it must remain usable! The law as written says, quote, FROM THE US GOV WEBSITE:

    “Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. Under this provision, currency defacement is generally defined as follows: Whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued,”

    It is this qualifier – with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued – that allows Where’s George to continue to operate successful and why the guy running it isn’t doing a lifetime of community service. It’s a little, non-commercial message. So don’t be nervous. It may seem outrageous, but it’s legal! BE A PATRIOT AND DO THE WORK THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REFUSES TO! GET THE WORD OUT (before Obama and his people really do make it illegal!!

    http://www.obamafake.bravehost.com/you_can_help.html

  14. 33 Starla July 3, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    Two Excellent Comments From:

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/30/the-express-lane-to-natural-born-clarity/#comments

    “naturalborncitizen Says:

    July 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM

    ed. There is an argument I’ve been asked about which claims that the Supreme Court in Minor v Happersett condoned Presidential eligibility for those born abroad to US citizen parents by the Court’s discussion of the “Act To Establish A Uniform Rule of Naturalization” in 1790, the nation’s first naturalization act. The contention is false.

    Justice Waite cited Article 2 Section 1, affirming the clear language that none but a natural-born citizen may be President. Waite pointed to that clause as well as the Naturalization clause empowering Congress as evidence that new citizens may be created by birth or naturalization. Clearly, persons who gain their citizenship from a naturalization statute are thereby NATURALIZED.

    At the time of their birth, naturalized persons under the Naturalization Act of 1790 were entitled to US citizenship BECAUSE they were simultaneously naturalized by the statute at the time of their birth.

    Hence, they are not natural born. They require a statute to grant them citizenship.

    see it here

    http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=001/llsl001.db&recNum=227

    In 1795, Congress repealed the words “natural born” from that statute and those words never returned. So, in 1875 when Minor was decided, the current naturalization act did not contain the words “natural born”, which had been previously repealed in 1795. It simply made those born abroad “citizens”.

    Justice Waite also stated:

    “These provisions thus enacted have, in substance, been retained in all the naturalization laws adopted since.”

    The key words here are, “in substance”. While the words, “natural born” were repealed in 1795, the following naturalization statutes granted “citizenship”, and “citizenship” is the “substance” of all naturalization acts of the US, not Presidential eligibility.

    That was the only time in our national history where a federal statute contained the words “natural born citizen”.

    On this issue, the current Foreign Affairs Manual at 7 FAM 1131.6-2 states:
    “c. The Constitution does not define “natural born”. The ―Act to establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization‖, enacted March 26, 1790, (1 Stat. 103,104) provided that, ―…the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born … out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

    d. This statute is no longer operative, however, and its formula is not included in modern nationality statutes. In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.”

    http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/86757.pdf

    Even the Obama administration State Department recognizes that there is a big difference between statutory citizens and Constitutional citizens. Recognizing that difference is not a new concept created by those who understand Obama is not eligible.

    Also note that the Obama administration has altered other passages of the Foreign Affairs Manual, but not this one: see for example, my previous report, entitled: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION QUIETLY SCRUBBED THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS MANUAL IN AUGUST 2009 TO EXPAND THE HOLDING OF WONG KIM ARK.

    Congress does not have the power to amend the Constitution or to define any term therein by statute. This may only be done by an Amendment, and, as the official US Constitution indicates, the natural-born citizen clause has never been amended, modified or repealed.

    Justice Waite stated that citizens may be born, citing Article 2 Section 1 for that authority. Chief Justice Waite also noted that new citizens may be naturalized by federal statute. Persons, who at their birth, require a naturalization statute are not natural born, but they are “born citizens” due to their naturalization at birth. Therefore, while there are only two paths to citizenship, birth or naturalization… some persons who are not “natural-born citizens” are “born citizens” due to having received their citizenship by virtue of a statute such as the naturalization statute of 1790, 1795, etc.

    So, under the 1790 act, while those persons might be “considered as” natural born citizens, such consideration derives via statue, not from the Constitution. Hence, regardless of the statutory terminology, those persons are naturalized and therefore do not meet the qualifications to be President. Justice Waite did not say that naturalized persons were eligible to be President. He noted that the Constitution provided citizenship to natural-born citizens and to naturalized citizens, but in his opinion he states directly that only natural-born citizens may be President.

    This is a very important point we take from Minor v. Happersett, that some “born citizens” are not “natural born”.

    I have seen an even more ridiculous argument on this point where it is claimed, “Just because the statute states in the title that it is a naturalization statute doesn’t mean the title has any effect.”

    I don’t need to explain that one to you. It’s a classic example of Seussian hooplah, the native tongue of desperation. Seriously, folks, be prepared for all sorts of Seussian hooplah (a form of argument which makes absolutely no sense by entangling the reader in semantical physiognominious correlative conjunctifisionography) by the other side now that the fact of US Supreme Court precedent stating Obama (and McCain) are not eligible for POTUS has been clearly identifed.

    Justice Waite made it clear, by recognizing the naturalization statute – that even though citizens may only be born or naturalized, not all born citizens are natural born. Some born citizens, like those who received their citizenship from naturalization statutes, are not natural born.

    Naturalization is a process by which those who would not otherwise be US citizens, may become US citizens by an act of Congress.

    Leo”

    * * * *

    “itooktheredpill Says:

    June 30, 2011 at 2:14 PM

    Great job, Leo.

    If Obama had been born a natural born Citizen of the United States, under Article II Section 1, then he never would have needed the 14th Amendment to claim U.S. citizenship.

    … And yet he did claim his citizenship was based on the 14th Amendment!

    The Obama campaign initially claimed Obama:
    “became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment”:

    The truth about Barack’s birth certificate

    Lie:
    Obama Is Not a Natural Born Citizen

    Truth:
    Senator Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, after it became a state on August 21st, 1959. Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment

    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

    http://web.archive.org/web/20080614132523/my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

    But then they scrubbed that text and replaced it with this:

    The Truth About Barack’s Birth Certificate

    Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.

    The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.

    Next time someone talks about Barack’s birth certificate, make sure they see this page.

    http://www.fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

    Why did the Obama campaign take a “14th Amendment” defense, but then scrub all references to the 14th Amendment?

    Perhaps because they realized that claiming “Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment” OUTED HIM AS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!

    ed. Their scrubbing is very telling. At the very least, you have to take notice that so called “Factcheck” seems to change their facts quite a bit. – Leo

    I quote the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v. Happersett:

    “The Fourteenth Amendment did not affect the citizenship of women any more than it did of men. In this particular, therefore, the rights of Mrs. Minor do not depend upon the amendment. She has always been a citizen from her birth and entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizenship. The amendment prohibited the state, of which she is a citizen, from abridging any of her privileges and immunities as a citizen of the United States, but it did not confer citizenship on her. That she had before its adoption.”

    Someone who is a “natural born citizen” does not need the 14th amendment to claim U.S. citizenship.

    The only reason for the Obama campaign to claim that “Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment” is because he was not, and is not, a natural born citizen.”

    * * * *

    “loren Says:

    July 1, 2011 at 7:00 PM

    Have you located any books that clearly say the President must have two citizen parents?

    Because here are three that say otherwise, with no mention of a parental citizenship requirement:



    ed. There are various references in publications, but they don’t really matter when there is US Supreme Court precedent stating the definition of nbc to include two citizen parents, as was stated in Minor. That is national law. The books aren’t. – Leo”

    * * * *

  15. 34 Quantum Leap July 3, 2011 at 12:34 pm

    The lazy Jackass usurper SOBama and his Islamo fascist Democrats added AT LEAST One Trillion Dollars to the Federal Budget in the last 4 years.

    That’s at least a 30% increase in federal spending in just 3 years.

    White House admitted this week that the bogus stimulus cost $278,000 per job.
    The lazy jackass, SOBama’s economic “stimulus” did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy, and a whole lot to stimulate the debt.

    • 35 Alex July 4, 2011 at 1:04 pm

      Made me cry – in a good way🙂. Thanks, Quantum!

    • 36 RacerJim July 5, 2011 at 8:52 am

      If anyone did that in the food court of the nearest shopping mall to me, White Flint Mall in Bethesda Md, the mall police would immediately respond en masse, arrest them and haul them away.

  16. 37 bill July 3, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    Here is a video I believe EVERY American citizen should view.

    • 38 Quantum Leap July 3, 2011 at 2:05 pm

      This is the third posting of this vid on this blog.

      • 39 Alex July 3, 2011 at 3:09 pm

        It’s very popular everywhere. What I think is most important from it is that people from both sides of the aisle have been trying to slimily slip Obama into office at least since 2003. That’s HUGE! That means every one of these &%^$#%^& knew that Barry was INELIGIBLE from the get go!

        But my question is still: Why? Why? Why? I’m sure there are plenty of ELIGIBLE corporate puppets of every race that would have been happy to do The Powers That Be’s bidding. What is sooooo very special about this particular foreign freakazoid, that all these Congress critters have known about since 2003??

        It’s a riddle in a mystery in an enigma in a pile of doody.

        • 40 Rosemary Woodhouse July 3, 2011 at 3:54 pm

          No, it’s not actually. He’s been groomed.

          • 41 Alex July 4, 2011 at 1:07 pm

            Yes, that’s obvious, but why him?

            • 42 Noway2no July 5, 2011 at 11:36 am

              I too have wondered, Why him? Why Now?

              If I could objectively just watch this play out it would be fascinating. Tom Clancy in collaboration with Charles Dickens could not have come up with a more intriguing plot.

              The usurpation of the US presidency by a numb-skull poser with a dark past who moves rapidly to destroy the last vestiges of liberty from the USA, and thereby the globe.

              All of this on the heals of an orchestrated financial meltdown of global proportions after making half of the western world feel guilty for even existing via the global warming hoax. Add in the global threat of Islamo-fascisim that the self-loathing-metrosexual people of the west think they can appease in true Neville Chamberlain
              fashion.

              Of course there is the arch villain, who happens to look and act like an arch villain, George Soros, the puppet master of the man-child usurper. The hundred years machinations of the global leftists aligned with the religion of death personified in the poser-in-chief. To round out the plot the government-media-complex is either in on it or silent in fear.

              Fascinating.

              Allowing it to continue is very dangerous though. For evil not to triumph we, those that have read history and have learned from it, need to be resourceful and unpredictable. We need to write the ending to this story so we can write an accurate history for future generations to learn from.

  17. 43 Alex July 3, 2011 at 1:33 pm

    On “Walking into Mordor” video:

    So, now I know what Obama is: An “oikaphobe”! He hates hisself, and is taking that out on the rest of us.

    I liked a previous production of this “Firewall” guy, but this one is disturbing. From what I can see, he’s defending The Powers That Be, and is asking for money to make a movie about how wonderful they are.

    I really don’t like it when people take advantage of others’ ideals. They throw inflammatory phrases around, try to push our buttons, then ask for money to push their own agenda.

    For example, with all the nuclear disasters happening lately, does anyone really want to give this guy money for a movie that glorifies this extremely dangerous, poisonous type of energy? He may sincerely believe that nuclear power is safe, but thinking people now know that is a myth.

    Are oil companies our friends? Anyone who has checked out their profit margins knows the answer to that. They are draining our wallets dry, and I think it’s because they know that we will run out of oil at some point, and they want to make sure they get every last dollar out of us before that happens.

    So, I appreciate the idea that we want to return to a simpler time, one where morals and ethics were an important part of one’s life, and where we held ourselves to a higher standard of living and behaving.

    But we know that this can only be achieved through taking a long, hard look at who our real friends are, and I can assure you, they are not the people who don’t have our best interests at heart, and that would definitely include the nuclear industry and the oil companies. I’m sure you can think of others.

    I’m not anti-capitalism or anti-business. I think our American way of life is key to the freedoms we enjoy. But some giants take advantage of their size, and they manipulate our government to get away with murder and mayhem, at our expense. They need to be reined in, not glorified.

    • 45 aj July 3, 2011 at 5:13 pm

      I am beginning to like Thad more and more. He was elected to the house 5 times so someone in MI like his leadership.

      • 46 heather July 3, 2011 at 9:55 pm

        Thad is announcing his candidacy tomorrow for 2012 POTUS!

        • 47 Quantum Leap July 3, 2011 at 10:11 pm

          cool. I think his nickname is TED/ Thaddeus or Tedzues is a Polish name isn’t it?

          • 48 heather July 4, 2011 at 8:55 am

            Not sure-QL–but McCotter is Scottish. This guy speaks so well and with passion for our country and people–not the hopies changie yelling screaming moving oceans and rivers thingy we got from barry.

            Listen to him again!

  18. 49 Rosemary Woodhouse July 3, 2011 at 3:57 pm

    • 50 attilasdaughter July 3, 2011 at 5:01 pm

      he forgot one adjective:

      They’re illegal.

      (as a legal immigrant myself I am really tired to hear this propaganda, for example “A day without an immigrant”, when what they really mean is “A day without an illegal”. It is not the same.)

    • 54 Alex July 4, 2011 at 1:31 pm

      Nice! Thanks for bringing that over – now that the Post and Email doesn’t have comments, I sometimes forget to go there :-J:

      An excerpt:

      [snip]

      “The Post & Email asked Connerat why he thinks that Obama is ineligible, and his response was, ‘It is not a question of thought; it is a question of fact. He admitted it, yet did not state why. We must take him at his word, regarding the confession which was filed in Connerat v. Obama II, as well as in this case. To better answer your question, I think he is ineligible because he admitted such ineligibility, in a court of law. This is documentary evidence. The usurper needs to set the Record straight, or the Court can order him to stop his ‘posing.’

      “Recently a U.S. Supreme Court ruling held that an individual has the right to challenge federal law which deprives the states or individuals of their Tenth Amendment rights under the Bill of Rights to the U.S. Constitution. Connerat has spent money in requesting that Obama prove his eligibility.

      “We asked Connerat if anyone helped him to prepare the Writ of Mandamus, to which he replied, ‘My father’s a retired attorney, so he helped me with some concepts and protocol (too many rules!), but I wrote the words.’”

  19. 55 sky July 3, 2011 at 6:56 pm

    boycott the hyatt,and any corp.donating to obama,your donating to Soros.

  20. 58 Quantum Leap July 3, 2011 at 11:10 pm

    (Reuters) – Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer on Sunday questioned Exxon Mobil Corp’s contention that its oil pipeline spill into the Yellowstone River was concentrated within a 10-mile area.

    Exxon said the spill, which occurred early Saturday near Billings, Montana, released into the river between 750 and 1,000 barrels of oil, which equals up to 42,000 gallons.

    The company also has said the spill appeared to be concentrated within a 10-mile stretch of the river between Billings and the nearby town of Laurel.

    But Schweitzer said the oil’s spread in the Yellowstone — which is the longest undammed river in the United States — could be more extensive.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/03/us-oil-leak-montana-idUSTRE7622H720110703

  21. 59 Troy July 4, 2011 at 9:17 am

    American Constitution faces ‘progressive’ threat
    Look what Obama’s buddies plan for founding document
    ——————————————————————————–
    Posted: July 03, 2011
    5:37 pm Eastern

    By Aaron Klein
    © 2011 WND

    Still more White House officials, including Attorney General Eric Holder, have ties to an effort funded by billionaire George Soros to push for a new, “progressive” U.S. Constitution.

    WND previously reported how President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, maintained extensive ties to Soros’ funding, particularly with regard to a movement that openly seeks to create a “progressive” consensus on what the U.S. Constitution should provide by the year 2020.

    Now, it has emerged that Lisa Brown, Obama’s staff secretary, served as executive director of the Soros-funded American Constitution Society, ACS, a progressive legal organization that was behind the Constitution scheme.

    Autographed! Get the book that finally exposes Obama and his team of anti-American radicals: Aaron Klein’s “The Manchurian President” at WND’s Superstore

    Brown’s White House responsibilities include managing the flow of information, advice and decision-making between staff members and Obama.

    Also, Holder has been closely tied to the ACS, serving on the group’s board of directors and even keynoting their 10th anniversary national convention earlier this month.

    In 2008, Holder also keynoted their convention. At that event, he reportedly urged young lawyers to get involved in the liberal legal network, saying America would soon be “run by progressives.”

    “The pendulum is starting to swing. America run by progressives. Really. It’s about to happen. So we’re going to be looking for people who share our values,” he stated, as captured in a YouTube video.

    (Story continues below)
    Read more: American Constitution faces ‘progressive’ threat http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=316621#ixzz1R9b0mYn0

  22. 62 Drew July 4, 2011 at 11:00 am

    Prediction:

    Obama’s “humanitarian” project for starving Muslims around the world, hopes to relocate over 50 million Muslims to America in the next five years… After they are given free homes (America has millions of empty homes!), they will need JOBS… Obama will recruit them into his Civilian Defense Forces, and task them with taking the UN-declared “illegal guns” away from “renegade Americans” … which naturally excludes all left-wing Americans, Hispanics and Muslims……

    from – http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2011/07/what-kind-of-name-is-barack-hussein.html#main

    What Kind of Name is Barack Hussein Obama? – A Muslim Name

    “According to Arabic language broadcasts intercepted and interpreted by Lipkin and his team, “The Moslem world is saying that President Obama wants amnesty for the current Hispanic 12 million illegal immigrants in the US in order to pave the way for the next wave of tens of millions of illegals from the Middle East to the United States, leading to 50 to 100 million Muslims living in the US before the end of Obama’s second term, which will be brought forth by these new US citizens voting for their savior, Obama.”

    Posted by Sam Sewell at 11:13 AM – Saturday, July 2, 2011

  23. 63 sky July 4, 2011 at 11:16 am

    soros tells obama to overthrow us patriotactionnetwork

  24. 64 sky July 4, 2011 at 11:38 am

    federalist blog on this site,right side column

  25. 65 susan h July 5, 2011 at 8:24 am

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/06/the_un-american_american_president.html

    In keeping with the theme of this article, the above from American Thinker is very good. Obama hates America and Americans and doesn’t mind showing it. His disdain has made me all that much more patriotic and appreciative of all that America stands for and is.

  26. 66 vichern July 5, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    Starla
    July 3, 2011 at 11:38 am
    & Carol Manning if you are watching.

    It’s all good what you say, and WE all
    agree.
    Where is the LEADER with the ideas and
    resources coming from to get us followers
    to sign up by the millions.
    WE thought we had such a leader in
    Donald Trump, but alas……………


Comments are currently closed.



July 2011
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,836,536 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS The Post & Email

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

%d bloggers like this: