©2011 The Birthers
Cross-posted with permission
Things for a Useless Idiot to do.
How to Make a Pawn
Meet the Useless Idiot Pawn Maker
watch him lose his pawn and the game!
The headline today at the pseudo-conservitive DailyCaller is a little misleading “Coming soon: Rubio ‘birthers,’ it is misleading because we already been there.
Well over a month ago several leading Birthers, including my dear friend Dr Kate, and I were trading notes on this very subject. Much of what we discussed can be seen in her article Questions for Marco Rubio, released on July 27, 2011 almost a month before Matt dropped his pinky on the keyboard.
News Flash for Matt: We just don’t know the status of Marco Rubio as of yet. While the Supreme Court did define a natural born citizen as one being born in the United States of America to two US citizen parents, they left the question of those born in the US to alien parents unanswered.
The simple fact is the circumstances surrounding Rubio’s birth in Florida and Obama’s purported birth in Hawaii are the condition of the parents. Rubio’s alien parents were classified as Permanent Residents while Obama’s alien parent was never classified as an immigrant, he was only given a temporary visa, which makes Rubio clearly a 14th Amendment citizen.
The transfer of Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio is unclear because the Cuban Constitution he was born under was suspended well before his birth by both Batistia and Fidel Castro. It has been reported that his parents were defectors of the repressive regime of Fidel Castro, and may have caused them to loose their Cuban citizenship the moment they stepped foot on American soil, leaving them stateless. The fact is we simply cannot see what went on behind the “Communist Cuban Cana Curtain.” The truth is we looked at Rubio’s allegiance at birth, not only where he was born and his parents, and we simply can not say with absolute certainty Marco Rubio was born with only US citizenship, so that no other country could claim his allegiance. Obama, on the other hand, self-documents his birth was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 and in doing so admits he was born a dual citizen, having multiple claims to his natural allegiance.
So why is Matt Lewis making a pawn out of Marco Rubio? Why are you so willing to sacrifice Rubio? As a pawn is sacrificed for a greater piece or to force a retreat, the answer to Lewis’ strategy lies in the closing of his article, if we question Rubio then in Matt’s pea sized mind we are not partisan hacks, but instead we are “either consistent racists — or consistently misguided adherents to the Constitution.”
Let me get this straight, if we question Rubio we are “consistent racists.” This means we don’t like blacks and we don’t like whites and since we are already on record questioning the natural born citizenship of Bobby Jindal, that must mean we don’t like Indians either. I guess we Birthers are either Chinese, or Eskimos.
The simple fact is when know-nothing, useless idiots cannot win the argument on the facts they resort to calling us racists.
consistently misguided adherents to the Constitution?
What does he mean by misguided adherents? Oh, yes, I forgot the Constitution of the United States is a “living document” that can change with the times and not a binding contract between We, the people and the government we created.
This is what we are to expect from useless idiots like Matt Lewis, as they try to make pawns out of others like Marco Rubio instead of honestly debating the issue of what qualities a natural born citizen has a birth and then examining those qualities to determine if a person is or is not a natural born citizen.
What we know to be fact is that these qualities a natural-born citizen are to “provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government.” John Jay. Could unalienable and undivided allegiance to the United States be the quality of a natural born citizen? And wouldn’t being born in the United States to parents who are citizens of the United States remove the possibility of a foreigner (dual citizen) gaining admission as a natural born citizen?
We also know that “At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875)
I guess we are pretty misguided alright. Tell me Matt how should we adhere to the US Constitution?
While you can position your pieces thinking you have an advantage, very often your opponent sees through your moves, and the pawn you set out to sacrifice for your advantage simply becomes lost, sacrificed for nothing.
In searching the circumstances of Marco Rubio birth we discovered that like Obama, and many other politicians, Rubio it seems has developed a tendency to creatively, create a biography suited to their particular needs. (i.e. That is stretching the facts.)
The official US records show that Rubio’s father came to the United States 999 days before Fidel Castro’s takeover!
Matt, you are a useless idiot and you just sacrificed a more or less decent man. Are you happy now?
Just so you know, here is how we plan on fighting the racism charges by you and the rest of the LameStream useless idiots. Here is our campaign slogan.
In 2008, you voted for Obama to prove you were not a racist.
In 2012, you will have a chance not to vote for Obama and prove you are NOT an IDIOT.