Archive for September, 2011

About that Memo…

©2011 drkate

SOMEBODY has a memo that will cause the humpty dumpty obama and his pieces of work to implode in a not-so-controlled demolition sometime soon.  And the pieces of this indecent descent will never be put together again as they take their place in various cell blocks across the United States.   It involves the following:

  • The joke is on you, bud.

    Gun running operation to Mexico in Operation Fast and Furious,  linked to

  • Murders that were expected to happen in the United States and Mexico using those weapons, which has infuriated the families of the murdered,the American people and the Attorney General of Mexico, linked to
  • Ready-made legislation to take away the Second Amendment rights of Americans prepared by a handful of Senators and Congressmen, linked to
  • Personal visits of Obama to gun control advocates promising that work is going on ‘under the radar’, linked to
  • The stated refusal to enforce immigration law, suing the State of Arizona,and encouraging other countries to sue a state in the United States, linked to
  • The State Department, among others, simultaneously running missiles and guns to Mexican drug cartels and involving…

…Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Valerie Jarett, Michelle Obama, Janet Napolitano and Hillary Clinton, among many more agents in seditious actions against the United States.

The memo is a direct link between the program and the gun control issue….it implicates the administration at an entirely new level of corruption here.

Pass the popcorn. And the tissues for our Country, people, and the trail of blood they have blazed.

SOMEBODY also seems to have a tape of a conversation to set up the GOP with the birth certificate, again ignoring Obama’s basic constitutional disqualification inherited from his claimed British-Kenyan father.  Obama has been set up by his handlers to lose this cover, but his insiders don’t seem to know that yet. They continue to aid and abet criminal activity anywhere there is an issue to expose is achilles heel.

As Obama loses his cover, he becomes an even more dangerous man.  Perdue was floating a trial balloon on postponing the 2012 elections and the idea is to scare or force people to give Obama cover for a martial law declaration.  He is deliberately creating chaos.

The only declaration I would accept is a firm declaration that this man is a criminal imposter, constitutionally ineligible for the presidency, unfit for service, and mentally insane. Time to revisit the Twenty-Fifth Amendment.

The Sheriff and the Tea Party

©2011 drkate

A Sheriff is a constitutional officer as he is sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution as well as the Constitution of the state he is in.  He is a law enforcement officer. As stated in this post and related to the Sheriff’s important role in reporting the crime of misprision of felony,

The Sheriff … should be one of the recipients of your letter alerting officials of the crime committed by Obama on April 27, 2011.  The Sheriff is one of the last lines of defense against constitutional incursions, be they by a usurper or by the U.N.’s Agenda 21.

The Sheriff has the authority to execute the laws of the state, and most recently has been featured as a critical constitutional authority enforcing the Second Amendment through several states’ Firearms Freedom Protection Act.  In most cases the Sheriff has the right to arrest any federal agent attempting to enforce federal firearms rules on its citizens.

On August 21, 2011 the Surprise, AZ Tea Party sent a letter to Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio asking him to investigate Obama’s April 27, 2011 birth certificate, ‘having exhausted all remedies‘ for its examination.  Less than one month later, THIS Sheriff responded with a “Posse Certificatus” (h/t WND) consisting of seasoned investigators. He easily defends his actions (h/t ORYR):

There are reports that two other Sheriff’s have been contacted to conduct an investigation.

Keeping Obama Off the 2012 Ballot

In combination with the 10th Amendment legislation passed by the states much can be done to prevent the fraudulent Obama from even being on any state ballot, even without such state-passed eligibility legislation.

Breaking her oath of office

There are fraud statutes that prevent the defrauding of public officials such as the Secretary of State.  We know that Pelosi submitted a fraudulent document to 49 of the 30 states verifying Obama was eligible under democrat party rules, and one additional fraudulent document to Hawaii stating Obama was constitutionally eligible.

What is Debbie Wasserman-Shultz going to do?  Lie to every state that Obama is constitutionally eligible and get thrown in jail for fraud because she can’t prove it?  A complaint of fraud would need to be filed immediately with the SOS office and the Sheriff in each state, calling for an investigation.  Don’t forget the excellent work of jbjd during and after the 2008 election, which were highlighted in Jerome Corsi’s book, and tools she prepared to spot the fraud.  These are useful today as you follow the paperwork in progress.

Candidate Challenges

Since none of the Republican presidential candidates have bothered to raise the issue of eligibility of Obama, the least thing they can do is to challenge the FEC ruling allowing a foreign-born person eligible to run for office.  A legal challenge should be immediately filed by one of the candidates.  The FEC cannot decide this nor can Congress.

Besides, we already have a definition that has been established for 235 years.

Click to Register for the Birther Summit. Today.

“Fighting the Firemen”

©2011 drkate

There are fires burning all over the country.  The peoples savings, opportunities, relationships, lives all in danger.

Instead of helping put out the fire, our government is spending all its time fighting the firemen…the American patriots!

…or alternately pouring gasoline on it.

Ezra Benson Taft in his own words, still relevant and helpful today.

“Fighting the Firefighters”

Continue reading ‘“Fighting the Firemen”’

Watching the Attacks

©2011 drkate

Paul Revere on "Big Brown"

My last post on the nature of the attack on and extreme threat to the United States posed by the constitutionally ineligible imposter named Obama suggests that this event is now more than just a law enforcement issue, it may also be a military matter.  The politicians have all the weapons in their hands and our money, the FED continues to wreak additional havoc…and the line has been crossed where ordinary citizens cannot carry the burden alone… although we will if we have to because we are Americans who love our Country.  The call has been placed and the alarm sounded to begin this process of removing Obama.

All signs that others are working are welcome…so let’s start with the delicious ridicule  Obama, his minions, and the media deserve for the 24/7 terrorizing of Americans.

  • Hillarious…Obama’s newest Orwellian attack on America is the laughing stock of the internet. 

Remember that narcissists hate being laughed at and all their ideas trivialized.

Here’s an interesting sign, h/t to NoNonsenseNancy:

where's her foot?


Open thread.

Is Usurpation of the Presidency an Act of War?

©2011 drkate

…and if it is, who was responsible for the usurpation of the Office of the President of the United States in 2008? And what is/are the framework or frameworks that enable immediate remedy?

In the post Acts of War a brief review of the many “acts of war” against the U.S. from within was presented, such as the 1913  federal reserve act and  fraudulent ‘ratification’ of the Sixteenth Amendment by SOS Philander Knox, Woodrow Wilson and the rise of the ‘progressives’-turned-socialists-turned democrats, and the  FDR, Truman & Eisenhower rise of the military-industrial complex with the CIA.  All of these over the last 100 years contributed to the placement of Barack Obama, a constitutionally ineligible phony, into the highest office in the land. Enabled Covered by the blind and uninformed support of millions–itself enabled by controlled media–an ‘advancement in race relations’–was cheapened by Obama and used instead to destroy them.

The placement of a usurper into the office of the Presidency of the United States is the most blatant act of war against America since the Federal Reserve Act and Sixteenth Amendments of 1913 and the establishment of the military-industrial-government (i.e. CIA) complex in the 1950’s.

Our framework for analysis and action on the breach of Article II has taken many forms, including executing all legal actions possible–focusing on forgery, definition of natural born citizen, violation of liberty interests, fraudulent social security and selective service, and election fraud.  In addition we continue to exercise our unalienable rights to life and liberty and our First, Seventh, and Tenth Amendment rights, we have petitioned, held grand juries and submitted charges of treason, and proposed and passed legislation.  There have been successes and drawbacks in each forum but we are quick on our feet.  The greatest advantage is that we have exposed the workings, form, history, components, and agents of this network and how Obama was placed into the White House.  We know how this regime is aided by cooperation of the judiciary and members of congress which turns a blind eye to the truth.

Continue reading ‘Is Usurpation of the Presidency an Act of War?’

Obama’s Falling Apart

©2011 drkate

Both Barack[/Barry/Soebarkah/Harrison/Steve] and Michelle Obama are falling apart at the seams in appearance, dress, and behavior by the minute.  And the regime itself is under fire from within its ranks, its flanks, and from direct opposition. The exposure of the true ‘Obamas’ evokes an unpleasant visceral reaction. Like bile.

Just look at the coverage of Obama:

Oh, and gunrunner, missile runner, money laundering, influencing testimony of federal witnesses, corruption at the DOJ.  Are his handlers abandoning or unleashing him?

And for Michelle…?

Michelle Obama never had any respect for America in the first place, scowling recently at the Ground Zero 911 memorial service. It shows in her facial expressions, demeanor, dress habits, and attitude.

No better site exists to chronicle  this ‘first’ lady than Michelle’s MirrorPhotos impeccably tailored to the subject of the post, it is interesting to see the archive that chronicles what appears to me to be consistently bad behavior…stemming, imho, from hatred, racism, and ignorance.

Here’s Michelle being her truly disrespectful and despicable self:


Shameful, disrespectful, clueless

Mocking is part of the Operation-update

©2011 drkate

Update. The post has been updated to include a video series about the CIA operation which led to the creation of “Al Qaeda”.


The CIA is the President’s secret army, who have been and continue to be conveniently above the law with unlimited power and authority, to conduct a reign of terror around the globe. The “old boy network” of socializing, talking shop, and tapping each other for favors outside the halls of government made it inevitable that the CIA and Corporate America would become allies, thus the systematic infiltration and takeover of the media. ~Mary Louise, Operation Mockingbird ,Prison Planet Analysis

Several times I have posted articles or links to the stories surrounding the tragedy of the events of 9-11-01 and recently stated that I do not believe the real terrorists of that event have been fully named or identified.  There is legitimate disagreement with the position I have taken, as well as the numerous posts and comments that state the opposite or a different view.

The inability to agree on a version of  who caused the events of 9-11-01 is partly because of Operation Mockingbird–a CIA operation that has been functioning since the 1950’s to influence, manipulate and control the major media and therefore what information we are allowed to receive. It has Nazi, communist, and globalist cartels origins, with the Nazis imported to our nation by other secret operations, such as Operation Paperclip.

Our disagreements, which could be rooted in this deliberate misinformation, result in divisions among ourselves which undermine our ability to find the truth.  This is precisely one of the goals of  a misinformation campaign…to cause division among the people.  Think of the numerous pundits who are likely participants in this mockingbird operation…Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Anderson Cooper…all coordinating their misrepresentation of the truth of 911, Obama’s eligibility, the state of our Nation.

So it is not surprising that we vehemently disagree on 911 and it does divide us. And the media-instigated labels of  ‘911 truthers’, or ‘birthers’ for that matter,  further marginalize anyone who seeks the truth about our invaded government. What ranks equally if not more disturbing is that the Bush family as well as other prominent individuals, lawmakers, media moguls, defense officials, university professors,  and families are neck-deep in facilitating the Operation.

Continue reading ‘Mocking is part of the Operation-update’

The Loose Ends

©2011 drkate

You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to know that something is wrong with the official version of the events of 9-11-01. Rather than a single event of a single day in history, its development was decades in the making.  If a research stops at 2001, not digging any further, then the other signs are missed, including the explosion of TWA flight 800, the first ‘botched’ bombing of the WTC under Clinton’s watch, the emerging ‘muslim terrorism’ under Carter’s watch, shepherded by Brzezinski, and the links to the current occupier of the White House, the lying Obama.

(video h/t Tenacity)

That Bin Ladin was killed again under Obama’s watch; that the witnesses, aka Seal Team 6, were also murdered, and that the CIA and U.S. Military appear to be at odds and running counter operations against each other is no laughing matter and is far from being a ‘conspiracy theory’.  For what reason is Obama gunrunning?  Why is Obama missile-running?

There are wars going on all around us, and within our country, and this most certainly will affect how–and if–we are able to secure our Constitution and our Nation.

Open thread.

In Honor of Americans

©2011 drkate

Words cannot express the pain of the losses suffered a decade ago at the hands of terrorists as yet unnamed or unmasked.

I honor all those who lost their lives on 911 and since that time…seeking the grace of God and his peace that passeth all understanding.

Psalm 23

  1. The lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.
  2. He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters
  3. He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his names sake.
  4. Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; they rod and thy staff they comfort me.
  5. Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.
  6. Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord forever.

Running as a Lie

©2011 drkate

“A weak, ineffectual blowhard”


Obama’s Thursday speech was a negative, blaming, angry, rant…enough to once again raise Obama’s inherent disability under the Twenty-fifth Amendment.  Lyndon LaRouche, among others, calls for his immediate removal from office.

While the mood of public disgust with British puppet President Barack Obama has become more and more visible over recent weeks, the number of political leaders who have been willing to come forward to demand the ouster of the President—the chief obstacle to a real economic recovery starting with Glass-Steagall—can be counted on the fingers of one hand. The notable exception is the six LaRouche Democratic Congressional candidates, who are calling for Obama’s removal from office.

Who among the republican presidential candidates will dare call Obama out on his criminal, racist, unconstitutional behavior?  And who will manage that herd of cats named congress that will do nothing but whine?

Fire Ben Bernake?  How about arresting him?

Open thread.

Exposing the Sixteenth Amendment

©2011 drkate

(Update:  I am republishing this 2009 post as background for tonight’s  (9/8/11) Revolution Radio show, where Sharon Rondeau guest hosts and interviews Red Beckman on the fraudulent 16th Amendment.  Our current presidential candidates have come down this way:  Bachman was an IRS/Tax attorney; Romney says everyone should pay; hairplugs-barbarian Biden believes paying taxes is patriotic; and Obama never saw a tax increase he didn’t like.  The current congress plays games either being for or against taxes, without addressing the real truth–income taxes have always been unconstitutional.)

A nation of intelligent people will not trust government with their rights, wealth, and future.  They will secure their inalienable rights by maintaining an efficient, honest, and powerless servant government.   A nation of people, who believe politicians’ lies, will be forced to pay for an inefficient, corrupt and authoritarian government that will confiscate rights, wealth and mortgage the future. –Red Beckman, “Walls in our Minds”

My assessment of this statement is that we have moved from a ‘nation of intelligent people’ to a nation that ‘believes politicians’ lies’.  This has happened over many years, and over many administrations and  generations of Americans…much damage to the Constitution was done between 1860 and 1920; between 1933 and 1950; with increasing frequency of course since then.

A First Big Wall Exposed

One of the biggest lies is that the 16th Amendment to the Constitution is a valid amendment, and that we are required to pay income taxes–taxes on our labor.  The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is the agency that was created to terrorize the people by making war on anyone who resists or refuses to pay taxes.

There are dozens of people in jail right now–many of them former IRS investigators, CPAs, and staffers.  These are people who have done the investigation and know the truth–they have torn down one of the biggest walls put up in front of the people’s eyes.   Look at what happened to Sherry Peel Jackson, a former IRS employee. These people would be America’s political prisoners.

They are convicted by juries of the people who do not know that they can judge the law and the facts. Evidence proving the 16th Amendment was never ratified is seldom allowed into evidence by judges and prosecutors. And why would they?  Being paid of of taxpayers money, isn’t there just a slight conflict of interest? 😕

When and if the U.S. Supreme Court takes this up, they will dismiss it and say its a ‘political question‘?

The 16th Amendment

Philander Knox, the U.S. Secretary of State at the time, falsely declared the 16 Amendment ratified on February 3, 1913:


Passed by Congress July 2, 1909.

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Before describing Bill Benson and Red Beckman’s historic work on the 16th Amendment, the concept of laying taxes on income was rejected in Pollock v. Farmers’Loan & Trust Company:


In distributing the power of taxation, the Constitution retained to the State the absolute power of direct taxation, but granted to the Federal government the power of the same taxation upon condition that, in its exercise, such taxes should be apportioned among the several States according to number, and this was done in order to protect to the States, who were surrendering to the Federal government so many sources of income, the power of direct taxation, which was their principal remaining resource.

It is the duty of the court in this case simply to determine whether the income tax now before it does or does not belong to the class of direct taxes, and if it does, to decide the constitutional question which follow accordingly, unaffected by considerations not pertaining to the case in hand.

Taxes on real estate being indisputably direct taxes, taxes on the rents or income of real estate are equally direct taxes.

Taxes on personal property, or on the income of personal property, are likewise direct taxes.

The tax imposed by sections twenty-seven to thirty-seven, inclusive, of the act of 1894, so far as it falls on the income of real estate and of personal property, being a direct tax within the meaning of the Constitution, and therefore unconstitutional and void became not apportioned according to representation, all those sections, constituting one entire scheme of taxation, are necessarily invalid.

These cases were decided on the 8th of April, 1895, 157 U. S. 157 U.S. 429.

So Congress had tried to impose a direct tax on income without regard to apportionment, which was not within its enumerated powers.  The law was ruled unconstitutional.

But they kept trying, and reintroduced the same bill in 1909.  It took nearly the entire Taft administration to try and ratify it.

How Some States did Not Legally Ratify the 16th Amendment

Bill Benson’s findings, published in “The Law That Never Was,” make a convincing case that the 16th amendment was not legally ratified and that Secretary of State Philander Knox was not merely in error, but committed fraud when he declared it ratified in February 1913. What follows is a summary of some of the major findings for many of the states, showing that their ratifications were not legal and should not have been counted.


Knox had received responses from 42 states when he declared the 16th amendment ratified on February 25, 1913. Knox acknowledged that four of those states (Utah, Conn, R.I. and N.H.) had rejected it, and he counted 38 states as having approved it.


Twelve other states, besides Tennessee, violated provisions in their constitutions requiring that a bill be read on three different days before voting on it. This is not a trivial requirement. It allows for a cooling off period; it enables members who may be absent one day to be present on another; it allows for a better familiarity with, and understanding of, the measure under consideration, since some members may not always read a bill or resolution before voting on it (believe it or not!). States violating this procedure were: Mississippi, Ohio, Arkansas, Minnesota, New Mexico, West Virginia, Indiana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Colorado, and Illinois. Now the number is reduced to 21 states legally ratifying the amendment..further review would make the list dwindle down much more, but with the number down to 20, sixteen fewer than required, this is a suitable place to rest, without getting into the matter of several states whose constitutions limited the taxing authority of their legislatures, which could not give to the federal government authority they did not have.

So, Philander(er) Knox falsely declared the 16th amendment ratified, knowing it was short by 16 states.  What was the rush?

Just let this sink in a bit.

The power that the income tax has over people is enormous…and it is laced in fear.  The government needs ‘tax protesters’ to accomplish their mission of creating a fear of questioning “the law that never was.”   Why don’t we hear about the cases where juries are returning ‘not guilty’ verdicts in tax cases?  Could it be that the IRS has everyone by the shorthairs?

And Congress uses this extra money to exact behavior out of states by withholding funding if a state refuses to comply.  When your senator or representative brings home the bacon, what did we give up for it?

Redress and the Grand Jury

The CC2009 prepared a report on this issue; the issue has been petitioned under the First Amendment right of redress, and you can still participate in WTP’s petition here; and is a fundamental tool needed to return our government to Constitutional governance.

It is critical to understand the power that individuals have with their votes in the Grand jury.  Jury nullification of bad law can occur but only in the context of fully informed citizen jurors.  Think of the heartache and disaster to thousands of people from losing their homes, cars, businesses, and lives to federal tax liens or confiscation.

Think about the jurors–your fellow citizens–who didn’t know that they could judge the law and the facts.  How can  you violate a ‘law that never was’?

Think about how helpful your local sheriff could be, as a constitutional officer, in protecting  your neighbor from IRS confiscation, arrest, or harassment.

Its time to awaken fully and get to work!

Democrats and Racism

©2011 drkate

Ok democrats. YOUR party is responsible for:

  • Jim Crow laws
  • Violence and attacks on the Civil Rights movement
  • Segregation
  • Destruction of the black family
  • Deplorable housing projects, like Obama’s Chicago
  • Chronic unemployment in the black community
  • Murder of black children through ‘abortion’
  • Voting for the unqualified, ineligible, lazy, racist, usurper Obama just because he is ‘black’
  • Infiltration of the muslim brotherhood into all agencies of the American government
  • Inciting violence based on race

Can you prove to America you are not racists?  I doubt it.  And don’t ask that colon, Powell, to hold it up for you.

September 2011
« Aug   Oct »

Recent Comments

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Big Government

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90