The Peace Prize War Monger

©2011 drkate

Illegal war orders

Obama has waged nothing but war since he usurped the office of the Presidency on January 20, 2009.  It has been a war on Americans, America, our allies, the Constitution, and the foundations of our Nation.  As his foreign agenda has become clear, he is waging war against all Arab regimes, murdering, assassinating, and bombing innocents with the sole purpose of destabilizing whole regions of the world.

It is world-wide community organizing agitation on steroids, and to boot, run by a narcissistic dictator who knows absolutely nothing except how to murder. In the process Obama has cheapened the meaning of the “Peace Prize” and destroyed any chance at peace.

Aside from hoping to get a poll boost, or to distract from ‘fast and furious’ and his profound ineligibility for the office he now occupies, Obama’s “end” to the Iraq war has as its primary goal further destabilization of the region.  Think about it…strategically all that is left now is for Iran to move on Iraq and to join forces with the sharia dominated Libya.  Obama and Clinton’s goal now must be the destabilization of Saudi Arabia.  They will keep poking and funding the muslim brotherhood in Yemen and Syria until Saudi Arabia is completely surrounded.

And then they can have their goal of murdering Israel…with blood on their hands and dripping from their fanged teeth.

What was in Clinton’s briefcase when she went to ‘support’ the murderous muslim brotherhood in Libya, or to “meet the rebels” in Syria?  Millions of dollars and promises of American NATO bombing runs with indiscriminate killing; a ‘wish list’ of who to assassinate, and a timeline to get this done in time to help Obama stave off an overwhelming election defeat.

And there’s John McCain jumping on the bandwagon of war, shaming America again. In retrospect can you see how McCain was just a straw man that Obama set up to defeat?

This blog is fast coming to the  view that Ron Paul is our only hope now to begin to restore the Constitution.   We must lose the empire to save the Republic, and we must lose the entire Congress as not a one can be counted on to stop this.

The baby-boomers have had their day…pissing on America in the 60’s and 70’s, having wet dreams of their destruction days as OWS “grows” its crowd of flea baggers…daring to compare it with the Tea Party.

The intellectually dishonest, disingenuous, murderous, anti-American communist demon-crats…how I wish these flea baggers were jailed:

Deliver us from Obama.

177 Responses to “The Peace Prize War Monger”

  1. 1 Tenacity October 24, 2011 at 10:06 am

    Amen sister Kate! One person’s excuse for not supporting Dr. Paul was that They* would kill him if he won. I asked if they didn’t believe he knew that. Yes, Dr. Paul is putting his life on the line by representing the truth, the people and the constitution. I am ready to take a bullet for him and believe that many others in this country are willing to do the same for the cause of liberty. It is time to muster our courage and resources. God help us to stand for what is right!

    Many have been scared off. Look at what They* did to Ross Perot. After a bunch of his staff were taken out, his family was threatened. Where is Jesse Ventura today? Ask John, Bobby & Martin what happens when you go against the banksters. Today is a bit different as many more people are aware of exactly who is behind the tyranny and they can’t blame Castro or the bogeyman.

  2. 2 Tenacity October 24, 2011 at 10:35 am

    ALERT: Final Implementation Phase of Obama Formal Dictatorship has Begun

    • 3 heather October 24, 2011 at 3:42 pm

      Ten–so how do we continue to fight them back? Will our only hope be our troops coming home in Dec?

      I know they all hate Ron Paul for what he stands for and for what he tells everyone he comes in contact with. At least he has opened the can of worms and I think this is one reason the thugs are trying to move as fast as they can to finish us off. That and there are millions of people now, not just in the US, that know what these NWO and now the Pope stand for.

      There is no where to run and be safe. No where, barry now controls the freakn world.

      • 4 Tenacity October 24, 2011 at 6:28 pm

        No Heather, nothing will change when our troops come home, if they come home. They will likely be redeployed. Here are 10 things we need to do to fight back:
        1) Keep putting God at the top of the pecking order.
        2) Stop financially supporting those operating outside the constitution. That would be the whole cabal in D.C. and their banklords.
        3) Recognize we have the right to judge the law and investigate anything and anyone as a grand juror.
        4) Exercise our right to judge the law as a petit juror by acquitting on victimless crimes and unconstitutional laws like the income tax.
        5) Vote only for constitutionalists.
        6) Blog your butt off telling the truth, educating people and helping real news go viral.
        7) Work toward Sound Money legislation in your State.
        8) Hold your elected officials, especially in your State, accountable to their oath of office.
        9) Volunteer for the Ron Paul Campaign.
        10) Be prepared when enough people are educated on the truth that we no longer have a de jure government.

    • 5 Starla November 1, 2011 at 4:20 pm

      Obama Calls Murder of Children in Libya A “Success”

      “The hypocrisy of Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama bombing Libya, a war crime resulting in tens of thousands of deaths and the maiming of countless others.”

      • 6 Starla November 2, 2011 at 3:45 pm


        Tony Blankley
        November 1, 2011


        “Now is a particularly dangerous moment for American national security interests. Not just because threats are growing. Not just because the current administration is making a historic bungle from China to Iraq to Iran to Russia to Europe to Mexico to our historic allies in the Middle East — both Jewish and Muslim. All that would be bad enough.

        But the greatest threat to our national security, at the moment, is the manifest indifference of the voting public to these foreign threats — and the silence on them from our alleged leaders. It’s understandable.

        The devil has our economy by the throat, and Americans (when they think about politics) are focused on what Washington should do — or should stop doing — to defeat our domestic economic threat.

        Read More Here:

        * * * *


        Pamela Geller
        Defending The West
        WorldNetDaily Exclusive Commentary
        © 2011

        November 1, 2011


        “[…] I-N-F-I-L-T-R-A-T-I-O-N.

        The government increasingly aligns with our mortal enemies. Steel yourselves.”

        Read More Here:

        * * * *


        OBAMA’S BIRTH”

        Read More Here: “Sheriff Joe: ‘Show Me The Microfilm!’”

        An Excellent Comment Under The Above Article Is From:

        “Joyce Perdue · Niagara Falls, New York

        It is true that he is nothing but lying every time he opens his mouth. But isn’t the whole govt and every segment of our society now nothing but lies? The press and news media…including Fox News lie and lie and lie! If it were not for those telling the truth to us like WND and Alex Jones, and Rick Wiles on Trunews…all we would know would be the lies. Our great country is no longer a great country but a country that murders by the millions with our fake wars the innocent, the littlest American citizens in the wombs, the drug murders….when it is the US Govt that transports the drugs for money and profit. They murder us with the medicines we are given, the lack of care in the hospitals, and it is all about money….murdering, murdering, murdering. We have kicked Christ out of our country…..and brought in the Muslims with their evil religion which is just another murderous part of our society now…..and Eugenics in every segment of our society. Christ is no longer wanted in our country so now we have become beyond evil….and the fruit of our ways will bring vast and fierce judgment till there is nothing left. And we did it to ourselves!”

        * * * *

  3. 7 Tenacity October 24, 2011 at 11:04 am

    “A new document released on Monday by the Vatican has some people wondering if the Catholic Church is aligning itself with the Occupy Wall Street movement.”

  4. 12 Durus October 24, 2011 at 11:22 am


    • 13 heather October 24, 2011 at 4:02 pm

      Rove is a kissass and an a$$h.

    • 14 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 2:17 am

      RE: Rove

      There is little doubt left now that Rove wants O reelected. Why, we don’t know. Does he get remunerated? We don’t know. He is not stupid therefore to make a statement like that shows that he is dishonest.

      Rove has been so far successful in intimidating GOP candidates. However, it is amazing that the minor, tentative statement by Perry whipped up such storm. Maybe we are at crossroads now? Will Perry comply or does he have the courage to continue?

      Ron Paul certainly does not have the guts to stand up against Rove. And you want him Prez?

  5. 15 Durus October 24, 2011 at 11:27 am

    Weekend Reflections: Ayatollah Obama Commits Perjury.

    Barack Obama has consciously and repeatedly avoided leaving any footprints in his 49 years. His life is completely undocumented (see here).
    However, during the campaign, Obama signed two documents in which he swears (or affirms) that he is eligible for the office of the President of The United States, one from the Commonwealth of Virginia, and another from the State of Arizona.

    On the candidacy form for the Commonwealth of Virginia, date stamped, December 13, 2007, Obama made the following statement:
    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that all of the information in this Nomination Paper is true, that as to these and all other qualifications, I am qualified to hold the office that I seek, having fulfilled the United States constitutional requirements for holding said office. I further swear (or affirm) that I have fulfilled Arizona’s statutory requirement for placing my name on its Presidential Preference Election ballot.”

    Read more:

  6. 16 Voco Indubium October 24, 2011 at 11:46 am

    RE: “And there’s John McCain jumping on the bandwagon of war, shaming America again. In retrospect can you see how McCain was just a straw man that Obama set up to defeat?…”

    Michael Savage (radio) said in 2009 that “McCain’s job was to throw the election” (Exact quote.)

  7. 17 Voco Indubium October 24, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    RE: A letter on Justia’s document falsification to Drudge
    (written by a friend)

    Maybe if some of us wrote a similar letter to Drudge he would move.



    I remember a time when you were always the first to break stories like this one:

    What’s happened between then and now? Why is it that there’s no journalist or politician with the guts to break stories about the biggest scandal to hit this nation since it’s founding? If there’s any doubt about the fact that the folks in Washington know very well what the term “natural born citizen” means this little exchange which took place on Apr 3rd, 2008 in the US Senate when John McCain’s eligibility to be President was in question, this should dispel any such doubt:

    “My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied.
    “That is mine, too,” said Leahy Homeland Security Michael Chertoff and Senator Patrick Leahy, (April 03, 2008)

    Don’t these statments, along with the evidence presented above regarding the revelations present a very compelling storyline and demonstrate very clearly something with far more consequences and ominous implications than Watergate, MonicaGate, etc ever had?

    Isn’t it interesting (or far far worse) that no one thought to raise the same questions concerning Barack Obama? Instead, you and the rest of the media were happy to focus instead only on his ‘citizenship’ and ‘birth in Hawaii’ (really?). Those two pesky words ‘natural born’ never seemed to quite be germaine back then to any such discussion. I wonder why?

    Then when forced to produce a birth certificate, the one put out in pdf format, for the world to see on the White House website, the administration presented a document that could not possibly have been produced by a simple scan of a paper document (Which. itself, was supposedly a certified copy of a 50-year-old paper document from a vault in Hawaii).

    Check it out for yourself. Get the document from the website, print it out on a color printer, then scan it back into a computer and save it as a pdf file. Then examine it carefully against the original pdf file, focusing especially on places like the “BARACK” in box 1, “STANLEY” in box 13, the mother’s signature in box 18a, the birth registration number “10641” (and many other places in the image). Then ask yourself whether or not that orignal pdf file is, itself a scanned image? If it isn’t, it could not possibly have come from a 50-year-old paper document. If not, then where did it come from?

    I’ll be looking for a link to this story on your website and while I’d be very happy to see it there, I won’t hold my breath.

    Thanks for considering it at least!

    From a regular visitor to the DrudgeReport.

  8. 18 Jan October 24, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    Great article Dr. K, thank you so much

  9. 19 jane October 24, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    DO NOT FORGET to ignore cellphones, TVs, Radios, and any means of communication on Nov 9th!!!!!!! Pass the message to believers.

    I do not even recognize my country at this point.

    Is there hope? Yes, and HE is soon to come and rescue us from this evil.

  10. 22 Voco Indubium October 24, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    What do you think of the news:

    “Texas Gov. Perry doubts Obama’s birth certificate”

    I will vote for Perry if he continues it. And I think, so will, others (support him). We should let him know that. Where is Ron Paul on this? Deep silence?

    • 23 Tenacity October 24, 2011 at 1:20 pm

      Why are so many still addicted to believing lies? Perry is a Rothschild agent, an agent for the Crown. His numbers have dropped off a cliff. He did not say he doubted Obama’s eligibility. He said that Donald Trump said he doubted it. It’s double speak. Taqqiya! He will say anything to suck in a gullible vote. He’s been doing it in Texas for years. STOP BEING WILLING TARGETS of subversion.

      • 24 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 2:26 am

        RE: Perry

        I said I will vote for Perry if he continues it (eligibility). If he is silenced like all the other GOP candidates, including RP, I will not vote for him.

    • 25 cali October 24, 2011 at 2:50 pm

      Problem is Perry is a Bilderberg member,a NWO believer, who was working hard on the Texan-Transnationial corridor, but was finally defeated the past couple of Weeks.
      Sarah Palin was our only hope, but as we all know, she was aced out or threatenend by someone, and now she is no more. Fox backstabbed her as well.

      • 26 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 11:15 pm

        Re: Sarah P

        Yes, I liked Sarah. She is straightforward, down-to earth and making sense. The only thing I did not like about her that she bent to follow Rove’s instructions on the eligibility.

        In 2008, the media’s attack on her was unforgivable. We knew more about the love life of her daughter’s boyfriend than the basic facts about O. When she spoke at a rally, 10 times more people showed up than to hear her than any other GOP personality. She projected the image of good person.

        My neighbor, influenced by the media, said that he would not vote for her because she has shrill voice. So I said: She is running for a public office, not auditing as an opera singer at the Met.

        Maybe she was just tired of the media-attacks and wanted to live her life.

    • 27 Ann October 24, 2011 at 4:05 pm

      If you read the whole thing he also says it’s a non-issue and a distraction. So not so much doubt there evidentially.

    • 28 bill October 25, 2011 at 12:01 am

      Well of course Gov.Rick Perry knows Voco Indubium ! He and at least some 400
      other,so called officials know.This will explain it ,should you care to look or download it :

      • 29 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 2:31 am

        RE: Perry

        I said I will vote for Perry if he continues it (eligibility). If he is silenced like all the other GOP candidates, including RP, I will not vote for him.

        • 30 bill October 25, 2011 at 2:53 am

          Yes Voco Indubium,I understood exactly what you said and I also can understand your thinking,on this subject.Seems like you and I share the same reality. 😉

          • 31 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 10:49 pm


            Good to hear that. It seems that not too many “share the same reality” in this group.

            • 32 Another Jan October 27, 2011 at 7:12 pm

              just a humble opinion, but if this Perry person does not believe
              the Constitution is relevant,

              then he is another sham who, if voted as a president of
              this country, will continue to lead us down the garden path.
              A path filled with blackberry briars.

  11. 33 jane October 24, 2011 at 12:58 pm

    I think he’s just blowing smoke to get back into the game

      • 35 bill October 25, 2011 at 3:24 am

        I also agree,but if Rick Perry is blowing smoke,he might try blowing it out of one of his other orifices because he has known of this charade since Oct-Sept 2009 and no way on Gods green earth would I support him unless of course,he cleans up his act.

      • 36 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 5:14 pm

        RE: (Perry) “I think he’s just blowing smoke to get back into the game”

        Which politician is not blowing smoke? That is their standard MO.

        Perry is now behind Cain and Romney. Romney is the one the O wants to compete against. O thinks he is the easiest to beat. Rove favors Romney too. As a consequence, the media attacking all of them, except Romney, who is treated with some degree of respect. Both O and Rove want Romney. What does that tell us?

        Back to “smoke”: If Eligibility is the brand of the cigarette Perry smokes, I don’t mind inhaling that second hand smoke.

        • 37 drkate October 25, 2011 at 5:39 pm

          Whatever. Rove has always loved Obama, that’s why he help engineer his win in 2008. Same this year. Romney will lose to obama setting it up for jebby bush in 2016, unless jebbie will be Romney’s VP choice.

          • 38 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 11:28 pm

            I am afraid you are right about “Romney will lose to O” . I have not heard that much about promoting Jebbie lately – but I am sure you are better informed.

  12. 39 Durus October 24, 2011 at 1:38 pm

    GOP lawmakers urge Republicans to steer clear of ‘birtherism’ in 2012
    By Josh Lederman – 10/21/11 06:35 PM ET

    LAS VEGAS — Two Republican members of Congress told GOP activists Friday that questioning President Obama’s citizenship was not the path to success in 2012.

    “Birtherism” reared its head in the waning hours of the Western Republican Leadership Conference when a participant asked Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) why they weren’t pushing to impeach Obama for what he said were Obama’s falsified citizenship documents.

    There is no evidence that Obama has falsified documents or committed any impeachable offenses, but the issue has continued to follow Obama three years after it emerged during the 2008 election.

    Read more:

    • 40 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 5:37 pm

      RE: (Durus) From the link you provided: “I think the birther thing is a loser. We’re going to impeach Obama, but we’re going to do it in the voting booth,” another audience member chimed in, to the applause of Lee and Schweikert. “

      In spite of O’s approval rating, he is raking in campaign money, hand over fist. What does that tell us? That the upper classes are betting that he is reelected.

      The majority of the voters base their decision on TV-sound bites. Who will be able to afford more of that? O for sure, about $1 B.

      Lee and Schweikert may experience a rude awakening after the 2012 election.

  13. 41 Durus October 24, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    October 24, 2011
    The Hobbits March in One Year
    By Lee Cary

    There’s a quiet in the Shire these days. And in Bree in the northwest of Middle-earth, the Hobbits stay close to their Smials, their “hobbit holes.” Meanwhile, the legacy media declares their end as a powerful political force. They only wish it so.

    The legacy media has declared the Tea Party irrelevant. It no longer matters. Sure, they mattered back during the 2010 election. Even the most dedicated shills have to admit that. But that was back when the Hobbits rallied behind their favored congressional candidates, those who espoused their beliefs. And the Hobbits sent many new faces to Congress.

    Read more:

  14. 42 Jan October 24, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    It is obvious that politicians are more interested in go to DC than saving our country and our Constitution.

    Let’s show them at the ballot box what we think of the chickens. Vote out every encumbent, vote in Constitutionalists.

    For any person currently serving in Congress/Senate to state there is no proof that obat is a fraud is a blatant liar. Every single one of them have been served proof several times.
    So, the next time one of them lies, let them know their aids must be throwing valuable information in the trash can and they need to fire their aids.

  15. 43 heather October 24, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    I beg to differ with you barry–the tea party are constitutional conservatives not some radical left wing communist–with ties to the young democratic communist party of america, or the rest of their radical crap.

    Oh barry, you stirred the pot and this is what you got and if a tea partier acted like any of these sleezy slimey pigs, they would have been arrested.

    Oh yeah and barry, why don’t we the people have standing in our own courts of law against you? eh?—did you pay all the justices off?–oh but of course you did…….

    Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.

    This is our country, we have worked, slaved, fought, gave our sisters, daughters, mothers, fathers, uncles, brothers and sons to protect and defend this country that you all hate so much. Hey, barry go print some money and pass it out to each one of those radicals that you put there and a 1 one ticket out of America forever.

    • 44 Durus October 24, 2011 at 2:37 pm

      The OWS parasites are starting to discuss raising up candidates from their midst to challenge the Tea Party, in their general assemblies. Read an article about that somewhere, this past weekend.

      Their Operation Mockingbird, if you will.

  16. 46 cali October 24, 2011 at 2:53 pm

    Our Veterans planning on marching this November 2011 in DC to take back our country. Hopefully the Tea Party will march, and would demonstrate a show of force.

    • 47 SallyAl October 25, 2011 at 9:06 am

      I will be attending and we want/need EVERYBODY to participate. I think this is going to be pretty significant.

      • 48 drkate October 25, 2011 at 9:10 am

        Brava! I wish I could be there with you. I agree that this will be significant. BTW I apologize for my earlier defensive reaction to the question of how many would be coming from this blog. All the best is wished for everyone there, and God Bless the organizers, patriots, and veterans that will be there physically and in spirit. I keep thinking that the Vietnam Veterans inscribed on The Wall will lend their support.

      • 49 no-nonsense-nancy October 25, 2011 at 9:23 am

        SallyAl, I will ask Dr. Kate to give you my email address so that we may be in contact with each other regarding the march. We can then exchange phone numbers. Looking forward to hearing from you!

        • 50 Sallyal October 26, 2011 at 6:35 pm

          There has been no offense taken from anybody. I certainly understand circumstances. Even my husband can’t make this in order to continue his job. I am using the last of my precious vacation available. I could be camping with my horse. Would be much more fun!

          NNNancy, that is a great idea. I wondered how we could get together. I was going to be at the south side of the Wa Monument wearing a cowboy hat and a red carnation!

  17. 51 dabigragu October 24, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    “Disarming the highways and filling them full of jack-booted thugs demanding to see our papers is no way to make them safer. Instead, it is a great way to expand government surveillance powers and tighten the noose around our liberties.”

  18. 53 no-nonsense-nancy October 24, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    Obama literally sh*t on the Occupy Vegas brats! It came from Air Force One!

  19. 58 no-nonsense-nancy October 24, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    Does anyone else fear that this “test” of our airways on Nov. 9 may be a lie, that it will be permanent? That it may not be turned back on? They have talked about cutting off the internet and have even proposed a bill in congress. Suppose they are planning to do just that on Nov. 9th. Does that date have any historical significance? Obama seems to love to do things on dates of horrible historic events.

    We have got to:


    • 59 Jan October 24, 2011 at 9:08 pm

      Nancy, Wikipedia list many historic events on 11/9.
      I still feel that obat will leave DC on the 4th, the test is on the 9th and Patriots Union and Veterans arrive on the 11th.

      Berlin Wall came down

      Northeast power blackout happened in 1965

      • 60 drkate October 24, 2011 at 9:23 pm

        All the better the veterans will be there, in case the military tries to take over in the name of Obama’s ‘national emergency’ (i.e., ‘whoops, we forgot about…whatever)…the military has been divided and the veterans and all citizens who attend and support this rally will mean a lot. Perhaps each of us should organize in our state capitols on the same day in support of this effort.

  20. 61 heather October 24, 2011 at 8:12 pm

    who will be the the first to buy and read this? will this open eyes that are still shut tight?

    • 62 drkate October 24, 2011 at 8:33 pm

      WOW! Phew, good, Good timing, gives a year to get this out. So all of our small efforts have helped…we truly have helped to open this whole thing up. And also our particular concerns and knowing the origin of the destruction of our Constitution…hopefully in time to reach everyone.

  21. 64 no-nonsense-nancy October 24, 2011 at 8:23 pm

  22. 66 no-nonsense-nancy October 24, 2011 at 8:49 pm

    Good idea, Kate, I think I will!

  23. 68 no-nonsense-nancy October 25, 2011 at 6:17 am

    Good idea, thanks. I don’t know how to check that. i probably couldn’t get it enlarged anyway.

  24. 70 bill October 25, 2011 at 6:35 am

    Subject: Re:Request for Herman Cain donation

    Date: Tue 10/25/11 08:27 AM

    Dear sirs, I would love to help but the Supreme Court has informed
    Americans,We can’t ask questions since “We don’t have standing” So I
    would imagine you don’t have standing as well ! cheers

  25. 71 Durus October 25, 2011 at 7:10 am

    Synthesizing JustiaGate
    Posted by Ann Barnhardt – October 24, AD 2011 12:38 PM MST
    Now a quick expansion on the sedition issue. Here is what I SUSPECT happened with regards to Obama’s elevation to power. This is just my theory given the evidence. Since there is no longer any journalism in this country, people like me are left to assemble the facts as best they can, and then parse and synthesize those facts into the most likely theory. I wish I didn’t have to do this. I wish that journalists would dig for and then report the truth. But since they refuse, this is the best that we can do.

    From the get-go in 2007, Obama wanted to run against McCain. Here is a quote from an AP story dated 2/2/2008 :

    Obama advisers have said privately for months that McCain would be their preferred opponent among all those who sought the GOP nomination.

    Citation URL here:

    The thing that has ALWAYS bothered me the most about the 2008 election was NOT the ascendency of Obama himself. That is no mystery. The truly imbecilic electorate in this country was told by the media to vote for the black guy, because voting for the black guy would wash all of their sins away. Good people vote for the black guy, and to so much as ASK a question about his background or qualification is RAAACIST. And the sheep ran to the slaughter, as they were told. This is no mystery.

    Read more, article just below the videos:

  26. 72 sky October 25, 2011 at 9:09 am

    11-11-11 6 AM at the washington monument all americans needed now. This is the best and only job americans should do on this day.

  27. 74 chris October 25, 2011 at 9:43 am

    Dr Kate, I guess you give up on holding out for the candidate who is not afraid to use the ‘silver bullet’ to kick o out? You are willing to settle for Wrong Paul who is afraid he will be laughed out of congress, and who says the obama eligibility issue is irrelevant? All these talks of upholding article 2 are just talks. We the people simply have no will-power to unite against all of them – obummo, congress, justice, law enforcement, pres candidates….
    If only we all descend upon them and demand obummo show his proofs of his elig!
    If only all the candidates gang up on obummo and demand that he shows his proofs of elig!
    If only we work like there is no to-morrow to convince everyone who will listen, to vote for the one and only pres candidate, Cody Robert Judy, who is waging elig war against obummo, instead of ignoring Cody Judy because you think he will never win in the primary.
    We are no different than the pres candidates and the establishment.
    We deserve 4 more years of obummo!!!

    • 75 drkate October 25, 2011 at 9:48 am

      No, I’ve not given up at all. In fact I plan to interview Cody Judy on Revolution Radio soon. HIs main effort right now is to get on the primary ballot and its getting close to that.

      I am disappointed in ALL of them. I have lingering questions for ALL of them. No one in Congress will touch it because they will out themselves as being enablers of this. I continue to be disappointed in Ron Paul’s failure to address this. But I think Rick Perry’s throwing it out the other day is disingenuous, and he contradicted himself anyway with his statement.

      • 76 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 6:19 pm

        RE: “Rick Perry’s throwing it out the other day is disingenuous,…”

        Probably it is.

        His statement was very weak and tentative – as if he is releasing a trial-balloon. However, look at the size of the storm that followed. We don’t know if he is going to continue this line or let himself be intimated by Rove, but when a high-ranking nominee just touches the surface lightly – it helps.

        A few more incidents like this and the eligibility could become a campaign issue, in spite of all the efforts by Rove and the Establishment GOP, who are leading the GOP for a sure defeat, repeating the McCain disaster of 2008.

  28. 77 SallyAl October 25, 2011 at 10:26 am

    FYI. Ulsterman has a new “interview” with insider.

  29. 78 Tenacity October 25, 2011 at 10:47 am

    How shallow to judge a candidate on one issue, especially an issue that could keep that candidate from ever achieving the authority to do anything about that issue. Everyone should read Larkin Rose’s “The Iron Web”.

    The battle we are in is way more complex than the likes of Mr. Judy has even contemplated, much less fathomed. I have shared links here in the past to the interviews of Svali. Here is just one interview that will give you a glimpse into the gargantuan spiritual battle we face:

    What other motive might one have to promote a Judy? Ah, anything to attract attention, even a small amount of diversion away from the one candidate that gets it…that has always gotten it. It’s like the diversion away from the one true God. Lucifer would prefer you deny even his existence if it will take your attention away from Iesus. So I call you out Chris. What are your true motives? Not just who, but what are you? Perhaps one of Van Jones paid web provocateurs? Another Fogbo perhaps? Some of us here know each other and trust our motives. I frankly don’t trust yours, so how about taking off the mask. Who did you vote for in 2008? 2010? What are your goals for our republic? How do you stand on Occupy Wall Street? What is your take on Alinsky? Are you a follower of Yeshua?

    • 79 chris October 25, 2011 at 12:05 pm

      Sounds like you are in agreement with the current crop of politicians – it distracts, it is too complicated, you don’t understand that we need to avoid being stripped of power so we can stay there to get things done eventually. Going after obama’s elig issue will only get yourself removed instantly and it does no good, blah blah blah…..
      Excuses, excuses, excuses!!
      Do you think the media will destroy all the pres candidates if they all unite to challenge obama with the ‘silver bullet’? All the candidates? (Certainly the first obstacle is – we won’t work to get all of them on board)
      There is nothing to fear but fear itself.
      The usurper and his lamestream has won by instilling fear in all of us.
      From FEAR comes EXCUSES.
      Keep hiding behind this kind of excuses? Might as well give up now!

      • 80 chris October 25, 2011 at 12:10 pm

        And do you think the media will destroy all of us if we all gang up to use the ‘silver bullet’ on obama?
        But first we will never overcome our fear. Second we will never unite en masse against our true enemy the usurper!

      • 81 Tenacity October 25, 2011 at 12:21 pm

        Sounds like you don’t want to answer my questions. You have responded with pseudo-intellectual ridicule and unrealistic hypotheticals. In other words, you are trying to sh*t a sh*tter and have exposed your syllogistic ineptitude. I will waste no further time with you until you answer the questions.

        • 82 drkate October 25, 2011 at 12:58 pm

          This blog is open to all except bots and we do not pick fights or start them here either. I respectfully suggest a respectful dialogue is maintained.

          Ten, with respect, Chris is like many for whom this issue is the most blatant, obvious, easy target…and has been written about here, the silver bullet to stop all of this against our country. Failure to address it demonstrates a deep cowardice and an urgent national security risk that should never be ignored and cannot be ignored. I have openly questioned candidate’s failure to address this, even Ron Paul, who I do think is the only constitutionalist and is necessary for this country. Will Paul even stand up to karl rove’s recent blatant statement re: Obama’s eligibility? And if he can’t even say something about it–like ‘pundits who once swore to uphold the constitution trying to change the meaning of it’–then how is he going to stand up to Obama in a debate, or the NWO?

          Judy is running as a democrat to challenge obama in the primary with the sole purpose of challenging this. Because of the legal mess created in the last three years, the ONLY person who has standing to challenge obama’s credentials right now is another presidential candidate. Even if it has to wait until election day, Judy (or any other presidential candidate) could still challenge him and allege ‘harm’.

          The trouble for all of us everyone in Congress is involved. Did Ron Paul vote yes in the joint session of congress on January 8, 2009? I know he didn’t raise an objection, but did he could have voted no, or even abstained. See, they point at one person and everyone is outed. They should ALL resign. And that can’t happen because so many have just been bought…and ARE of satan!

          The only way Obama could have gotten in is that they are ALL involved–media, banks, congress, courts, college profs, hollywood, newspapers, pundits…so the forces are huge as you point out. Is Obama low-hanging fruit because of his ineligibility? They could stay in power if they’d just deal with it now…a temporary amnesty if you will before they gracefully resign (with no benefits). You can give Judy credit for this, because none of the ‘bigger names’ will take this on.

          Now, if there is a strategy, i.e., to wait until its too late for the Dems to nominate someone else, to absolutely use this, or, AFTER the election, the eventual nominee does actually legally challenge the outcome right before the electoral college vote, then there may be a way, pursuant to the Constitution (supreme court is last to hear it), for Congress to investigate and properly vote in the president-in waiting- in early Jan 2013. What candidate will promise to pursue this strategy? And when will we know?

          Everyone one here knows more than they think we know. So the signs can be subtle but there that eligibility is a constitutional issue, not a ‘political question’.

          Who knows anymore anyway? 😕

      • 83 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 6:35 pm

        RE: ” Sounds like you are in agreement with the current crop of politicians – it distracts, …..Going after obama’s elig issue will only get yourself removed instantly and it does no good, blah blah blah…..”

        That is why I don’t understand why this group is 99% behind RP. He let himself be intimidated by the Rove types. How can the “champion of the constitution” do that?

  30. 84 bill October 25, 2011 at 12:17 pm

    To whom it may concern,
    Over the past three years many a good citizen has tried everything in their
    power to find out exactly who this man ,Barack Obama is,and nothing so far
    has been met with any satisfaction.Our court system has informed everyone
    that “We have no standing” and need not ask.
    Since I can only speak for myself,I have decided to email every candidate
    and inform them,I will not send them one penny to help them nor will I
    capitulate and vote for anyone as the lesser of two evils.
    What I am speaking of here is the most precious document known to man
    after The Bible ,The United States Constitution and be advised,I will forsake
    neither.If the politicians of Our country just can’t or won’t follow their
    Oaths of Office then I am suggesting We the People find those who will.
    I am asking all concerned citizens to consider this proposal and decide
    if they will consider this as a mandate.Thank you, an American citizen.

    • 85 Tenacity October 25, 2011 at 12:40 pm

      bill, it is a deep topic and I am with you 100%. Frankly, the problem of standing or our ability to accomplish any redress of all the other constitutional grievances lies within Baron Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s 1838 statement, “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.” The reason I focus on Sound Money legislation within each state is that our proprietary ownership of our money (the fruit of our investment of capital & labor) is the only way to break the banking/taxing vortex. The banksters have bought all of our protective institutions with the wealth they have stolen via that vortex. We will not regain control of our elected officials, judiciary, information flow, educational systems, standing or even our pulpits until we break that vortex. Thus without Sound Money, elections have minimal effect.

    • 86 drkate October 25, 2011 at 1:03 pm

      I going to follow your lead Bill, thank you. Got your EM regarding certified mail to Gov Perry!

      • 87 bill October 26, 2011 at 2:38 am

        Well drkate,The EM you got could now be considered “ancient history” but unlike the Dead Sea Scrolls,there are probably several hundred Certified Mail
        Receipts held by ex American Grand Jury members floating around on their computers to other Artful Dodgers who were notified.I can’t help but believe,what
        was hidden in the dark will come to the light,and still believe it is up to God ,if asked,will offer any redemption to those of us,who have messed up and
        forgot who threw this party. 🙂

  31. 89 heather October 25, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    I heard this morning that Americans are in step with that new illegally formed national popular vote — has anyone heard anything more?

  32. 90 Starla October 25, 2011 at 4:14 pm

    “Presidential Candidate To File Multi-State Constitutional Eligibility Lawsuit Against Obama”

    * * * *

    “A Call to Action!!!!! Veterans Day – March on D.C. Video!!!!!”

  33. 91 heather October 25, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    How can they change our voting system without a constitutional amendment? They have no right to change anything and if this happens we the people better roar like the lions we have become. This is something we cannot allow them to get away with.

  34. 93 Troy October 25, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    Chris and Tenacity, both, want redress on very important issues…..The thing is that Obama’s ineligibility is just a symptom of our country being owned and controlled by the International Banksters, via the Federal Reserve…..Without our country being owned by “the shadow government” Obama would have never even made it into office.

    Both of these problems need remedy, but you have to ask yourself, “What came first, the chicken or the egg?”

    So, here’s the deal – Remove Obama on ineligibility and we still have a lawless shadow government ready to install the next puppet and possibly another usurper…..Neutralize the shadow government, via abolishing the Federal Reserve (returning to sound money backed by a precious metals) and we’ll never see another Obama coup in this country again.

    One last thing – We have to be realistic and we all know by now that nothing is EVER going to be done about Barry…..It’s just NOT!…Not as long as the country is ruled by the criminal puppet masters…..Take our money and economy away from them and the umbilical cord has been cut…..Once that is done all other chips will begin to fall in place….We would also be able to arrest, prosecute, convict and hang Barry if the newly freed court should so decide.

    • 94 heather October 25, 2011 at 7:09 pm

      Seems to me this is what Ron Paul is pushing for without coming right out and saying it. Get rid of the fed, and get out sound money system back, its the only way.

      • 95 Tenacity October 25, 2011 at 8:18 pm

        Exactly Troy & heather. My response above is still in moderation so appreciate you bringing forth a realistic viewpoint. Hanging your hat on a lightweight with a good idea and expecting this court system to miraculously grant standing is …well…doing the same thing and expecting a different result.

        • 96 Jan October 25, 2011 at 10:36 pm

          This is not for just Ten, but all of you. I received a request today to contact Congress/Senate and tell them to outlaw the mercury lightbulbs.

          My answer to this is, pack up all your mercury lightbulbs and send them to your Congress/Senate local office (if you send them to DC they will sit in the mail room for months.)
          Send a note along with them that because these are filled with mercury and are a hazard, you did not know where to throw them away. Before you mail them off, be sure to wrap them well with bubble wrap so they don’t break.
          And be sure to stock up on good old fashioned light bulbs. Also, send them UPS or FedX as the post office will not take them

    • 97 drkate October 25, 2011 at 8:44 pm

      I’ve come to the same conclusion. “You can’t always get what you want” (eligibility used as a silver bullet), “but if you try somehow, you get what you need” (a Ron Paul presidency)…

      • 98 Troy October 25, 2011 at 9:07 pm

        YES, we need to try to make that happen!

        • 99 heather October 25, 2011 at 9:33 pm

          Pray for Ron Paul to win the nomination. If he wins that he will be our 2012 potus–he has massive amounts of followers, and most of them are the younger generation!

          • 100 Paula October 26, 2011 at 1:00 pm

            I’m with ya’ll. I keep seeing young folks with Ron Paul 2012 signs. Looks promising. He was my candidate in 2008 until he bowed out or lost the primary (can’t remember which happened). He’s the only one that is viable that makes constitutional sense.

            I cannot in this election vote for someone that I know has no chance of winning even though they’re going after Obama’s eligibility.

  35. 101 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 7:12 pm


    Your above analysis (answer to Ten) is excellent. The only observation I would like to make is with regard: “strategy, i.e., to wait until its too late for the Dems to nominate someone else”. The Dems will not nominate anyone else unless they are forced by the eligibility. However, anyone counting on that strategy implicitly makes the assumption that the Dems will be forced to make such change before the election. If that assumption is wrong and O gets reelected in the meantime, in my opinion, it is too late. The regime stranglehold on the Judicial Branch and the Media will be tightened.

    If the elig-issue is not becoming a campaign issue well before the election, there will be no candidate, judge or member of congress who will dare to open his mouth even half way.

  36. 103 drkate October 25, 2011 at 7:38 pm

    Presidential candidate to file lawsuit against Obama eligibility–h/t Starla above

    • 104 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 11:59 pm

      There is an error in the press release. It says the candidate has Standing because the 9th Circuit provided Dicta. (Paraphrased.)

      Dicta are not binding. Dicta are not precedence. Remember that Alen Keyes did not have standing as a nominee?

      If their attorney is as poor as the above referenced statement, they don’t have a chance. Hopefully that is not the case.

  37. 105 Troy October 25, 2011 at 7:45 pm

    He’s probably correct.
    Glenn Beck ‘hates GOP,’ but here’s his ticket prediction
    Tells television audience: ‘That’s the way the machine works’
    Posted: October 25, 2011
    9:11 pm Eastern

    © 2011 WND

    Herman Cain, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann … you can all go home now. The Republican “machine” has settled on former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney as the 2012 GOP nominee and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio as the vice-presidential candidate, according to popular commentator Glenn Beck.

    Beck yesterday told his GBTV audience that while he’s not crazy about the prospect, that’s what it is.

    “I hate the Republicans just as much as I hate the Democrats,” he said on yesterday’s program. “I haven’t found anybody I can vote for yet. … It’s going to be Mitt Romney and Rubio. You watch. It will be. That’s the way the machine works.”

    The comments came in the middle of a program about the nationwide “Occupy” protests and how they’re being pushed, promoted and programmed by leftists.

    (Story continues below)
    Read more: Glenn Beck ‘hates GOP,’ but here’s his ticket prediction

    • 106 heather October 25, 2011 at 9:27 pm

      Since I emailed Rush 2 wks ago to stop pushing Rubio due to his ineligibility because his parents were not citizens at the time of his birth, I have not heard him speak of it again. I simply told him, that he and the rest of the radio hosts, pushed Clinton in 08 and look what we got.

      If he continued the push for Rubio (even though I like him and believe that he loves America) then the US will never follow the rule of law for anything again. So stop pushing non natural born citizens. Plain and simple because he would lose at least half of his listeners and he would be on the losing end.

      So Beck can sit down and sthu!

  38. 107 Troy October 25, 2011 at 7:47 pm

    Islam makes inroads through U.S. courts
    Many cases being decided by edicts from Muhammad
    Posted: October 25, 2011
    8:15 pm Eastern

    By Michael Carl
    © 2011 WND

    Islamic law, or Shariah, already is being applied in the U.S. court system, according to an extensive new report..

    A recent Center for Security Policy study called “Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases outlines dozens of cases in which the Islamic system of law has been applied.

    Center spokesman David Reaboi said the Islamic strictures are being carried out mostly in cases in which foreigners are the principals.

    Get your autographed copy of Pamela Geller’s “Stop the Islamization of America” directly from WND.

    “Shariah enters U.S. courts through the practice of comity to foreign law,” Reaboi explained. “This happens, for example, when a judge decides to allow the use of say, Pakistani or Saudi family law (Shariah) in a dispute between Pakistanis or Saudis.”

    He said the study only scratches the surface of Shariah’s presence in the nation.

    (Story continues below)
    Read more: Islam makes inroads through U.S. courts

  39. 108 Troy October 25, 2011 at 7:53 pm

    Farah gets it right and states it correctly.

    Confusion reigns over eligibility issue
    Posted: October 25, 2011 5:28 pm Eastern
    © 2011

    There’s a brand-new “birther” in town, the media would like you to know.

    It’s Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who suggested in an interview he’s not sure if he has seen Barack Obama’s real birth certificate – yet, he adds, has no reason to doubt his birth story.

    Why are the media so determined to smoke out high-profile skeptics on the issue of Obama’s truthfulness about his birth narrative?

    Very simple.

    Because the Big Media are engaged in a classic disinformation campaign to intimidate anyone who is serious about the Constitution and its requirements for the office of the presidency – or, for that matter, what the Constitution says about anything.

    Any serious debate about Obama’s eligibility should have ended a long time ago. He’s not eligible. It matters not where he was born – which, ironically, is still very much in doubt. What matters is that he was not born of parents who were American citizens at the time. That’s what “natural born citizen” means. It does not mean “born in the USA,” much as Obama and his protectors in the media would like you to think.

    The king of “missing records” is sitting in the White House — investigate yourself with “The Secret Life of Barack Hussein Obama”

    Not only do the media activists attempt to obscure the clear meaning of the Constitution in their breathless assertion that anyone born in the USA is “natural born,” they also, I believe, seek to attack at its root the reliance on “original intent,” which couldn’t be clearer.

    Keep in mind, the American colonies were just that – colonies of the British crown. Prior to the Magna Carta, natural born subjects were those born under the jurisdiction of the king. But that definition changed with the Magna Carta and the British Nationality Act of 1772, which declared that children born of British subjects outside the jurisdiction of the crown be natural born subjects. That would thus be the undeniable interpretation of the framers of the Constitution – substituting only the word “citizen” for “subject.”

    To underscore this point, the 1790 Uniform Naturalization Act, passed just one year after the Constitution was ratified, defined minor children of aliens as U.S. citizens only upon naturalization of the father.

    “Natural Born Citizen” was defined by an 1875 Supreme Court ruling (Minor v. Happersett) as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

    (Column continues below)

    • 109 Jan October 25, 2011 at 8:24 pm

      Just listened to a teleconference with Joe the Plumber. He is running for Congress. The second caller asked him about the birth cert and his answer was, whatever happened, we need to vote him out in 2012.
      Everything else he said was good, even referring to the Constitution.

      Do candidates have to sign a sworn document vowing to not bring up the birth issue?

      • 110 Voco Indubium October 25, 2011 at 11:47 pm

        RE; “Do candidates have to sign a sworn document vowing to not bring up the birth issue? ”

        It sure looks so, if you are part of the GOP. We need a third party badly.

        • 111 bill October 26, 2011 at 10:43 am

          Would it do any good for candidates “to sign a sworn document vowing to not bring up the birth issue? ” None of them can seem to remember their “Oaths of Office ” that they already took ! 😦

        • 112 sky October 26, 2011 at 11:54 am

          I think the reason people on capitol hill are not bringing up the treason obama is doing is because we now know about the FED,& income tax.

    • 113 Durus October 26, 2011 at 11:35 am

      Farah states at the end of his article:

      This legal principle was restated, ironically, in 2008 by the U.S. Senate in confronting concerns over the eligibility of presidential candidate John McCain. The U.S. Senate resolved by a 99-0 vote, which included one cast by Obama himself, that McCain was indeed eligible because both his parents were U.S. citizens. It mattered not that he was born in Panama. It wasn’t even an issue.

      Neither does it need to be an issue of where Obama was born.

      We need only ask ourselves one question: “Were both his parents U.S. citizens when he was born?” By Obama’s own admission, and also by the questionable documents he has provided the public, the answer is “no.” And that settles it. Obama is not eligible to be the president.

      He finally gets it, after all this time… how much money did he spend on “where’s the birth certificate” and “where’s the real birth certificate”?

      When there are those of who has been screaming all along… “It’s not about the bloody Brit’s birth certificate!”

      It has always been about the Brit owing allegiance to the foreign sovereigns of Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.

      Owing allegiance to even one foreign sovereign disqualifies a person from being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States.

  40. 114 Jan October 25, 2011 at 8:26 pm

    Jon McNaughton in the process of a new painting, captures the scene. Jon McNaughton’s latest painting, WOW!!!

  41. 117 Troy October 25, 2011 at 8:43 pm

    James O’Keefe is at it again! 🙂

  42. 118 chris October 25, 2011 at 10:19 pm

    At the risk of angering the Paul fans, here is my 2-cents.
    Rest assure I am not an obot. I have no ulterior motive but to restore our constitution, to keep our freedom, our liberty and pursuit of happiness.
    Usurpation of the presidency is a matter of national security. Obviously Ron Paul does not care about this aspect of national security.
    Ron Paul’s isolationalist ideology is the other side of the same obama coin –
    obama wants to soften them with kindness and humility; Ron Paul wants to isolate ourselves from them. The islamofascists/terrorists/jihadists sneer at and take advantage of the obama ‘kindness/humility’; they will take Paul’s retreat and isolation as invitation for their advances. Either way we cannot avoid war with them for they will simply bring the war to us! They work on principles of advancing a foot when given an inch, advancing a yard when given a foot, and are determined to annihilate anyone who is not one of them….. This is a dangerous world. They are dangerous fanatics. There is no avoiding war with them. So far we are not allowed to win the wars. If we go to war to win (and we CAN win!) we will put them in their places. Retreating or isolating ourselves won’t keep them at bay!
    With so many of these fanatics already in our country and a Ron Paul who is so sympathetic to their rights, do you really think they won’t team up with the international bankers to keep our financial system a horrid mess?
    obama welcomes the terrorists into our country.
    Ron Paul sympathizes with the terrorists and leaves them alone.
    There is not much differences!

    • 119 Troy October 25, 2011 at 11:04 pm

      Everyone is entitled to their opinion and in my humble opinion I believe that you couldn’t be more wrong…..As far as I’m concerned this country needs about 15 – 20 years of good old fashioned isolationism just to bring us back from the brink of collapse that globalism has led us to.

      I can’t understand what is wrong with taking our military the hell out of other countries and then using them to protect our borders…..Not only the borders, but our ports and airports need to be militarized also…..Dissolve the freakin’ TSA….With some of the money that will be saved we can upgrade our home defense with the latest and greatest technology and dare any foreign element, stupid enough to make the mistake, to take a shot at us…..Simply make an example out of them to the rest of the world.

      • 120 drkate October 26, 2011 at 9:01 am

        I would also put a one or two year moratorium on any immigration from anywhere in the world and get our own paperwork in order. I would change the rules for muslims coming to America…they couldn’t for a long time.

        • 121 Tenacity October 26, 2011 at 10:51 am

          Kate, with all due respect to you, I have refrained from ‘picking a fight’ but you can’t ask me to stand by and allow imbecilic lies to be spread. When someone takes the elite establishments propaganda, the mainstream medias pure unadulterated bull dung and comes here with unrealistic hypotheticals and tries to shame you and others into agreeing with their unresearched brain-soiled smear tactics, you gotta let me have at them.

      • 122 Durus October 26, 2011 at 9:30 am

        I have no doubt about President Washington being right about how the United States should have been involved in foreign policy.

        President Washington related in his farewell address:

        Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it – It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue ? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?

        In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations, has been the victim.

        So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

        As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils. Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.

        Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

        The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.

        • 123 Tenacity October 26, 2011 at 3:19 pm

          Thank you Durus! Today we operate in sound bytes. The Statesman is hardly afforded the opportunity to fully convey his thought. The liar prefers it that way as they really do not want their sound byte questioned. This is one reason the effectiveness of ridicule has been amplified.

          When an intelligent statesman speaks in concise terms, it takes someone with a relative intelligence to perceive their message. If you have little knowledge of the background or the speaker’s intent, you may easily be misled by preconceived notions (I.e.: red white & blue fever, normalized rationale or normalized repetitious lies) or controlled resistance like pseudo ‘silver bullets’. There are no silver bullets in the empire of lies. We must back out of this ambush the same way we came in. We must also return to those principles that our nation was founded upon just like those expressed by Washington above.

          We have been sucked into every war since our founding for at least 2 of 3 reasons each time and more: 1) War has been used to destroy the protestant and orthodox churches; 2) It has been used to make the elite bankers richer by financing both sides of each conflict and increasing debt, and; 3) War has always been used for population control. The conflicts after WWII have been used for all of the above reasons plus regime change, oil, and facilitating the illegal drug business owned and operated by the same bankster globalist elite.

          Dr. Paul sympathizes with no terrorist, especially the real terrorist that start the wars and steal our wealth via the banking/taxing vortex. RP has committed to securing our borders and not cutting a nickel out of our defense. He has not suggested abandoning a single ally. ANYONE who suggests Dr. Paul does not care about ANY aspect of national security must twist his words and entirely misrepresent his true position to justify their fallacy. In short, they know not of what they speak, but that will not stop them from spewing their venom.

          This is most certainly a dangerous world…made so mostly by those who believe the lies of tyrants. Hear it from the lips of one of the tryants:
          “Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
          – Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference in Evians, France, 1991

      • 125 Paula October 26, 2011 at 1:07 pm

        Well said. Wish we had more that think like you do in our government.

  43. 126 Troy October 25, 2011 at 10:50 pm

    Former Soviet Citizen Confronts Socialists at OW

    Hehehe!!!….He cleans their clocks!

  44. 127 Troy October 25, 2011 at 10:51 pm

    Straight from those who would know.

  45. 129 Troy October 25, 2011 at 11:10 pm
    Treason? Senior Communist Lobbies “Super Committee” for Defense Cuts
    October 23, 2011 – 8:27 am EST | 4 Comments

    A senior Communist Party USA activist is leading a nationwide effort to lobby the Congressional Super Committee of 12 to propose deep cuts to US defense spending. Judith LeBlanc is a leader of the Communist Party’s Peace and Solidarity Commission, the party body charged with directing the US peace movement and liaising with foreign “peace’ […]

  46. 130 bill October 26, 2011 at 3:11 am

    OT but from Sharons site ,on post about Darren Huffs conviction,It looks like the
    bottom line is “Go to Tennessee-Go directly to jail ! If there are no formal charges or proof,don’t worry,The artful dodgers will fabricate some 😦

  47. 131 jane October 26, 2011 at 5:06 am

    I am reminding you to mark your calendar for NOVEMBER 9th….around 2pm EST……do not be on your computer/TV, radio, cellphone, phone, in fact UNPLUG everything before you go to work!

    Please heed the warning……something is amiss.

    • 134 bill October 26, 2011 at 8:19 am

      Thanks heather for the post,Seems Faux news is interested in getting rid of Obama,but can’t we please,please, do it without having the rats go down with the sinking ship ? Whatever folks might think of Greta,this woman has a mind like a steel trap and for her to say “I believe the BC is valid is laughable” Well of course you do ! Tootsie ! lol

      • 135 heather October 26, 2011 at 11:20 am

        Of course Greta would say that, she has to for her job stability, but in reality non of them believe that barry is a nbc–they all know he isnt. And Greta always asks the right things, shes also the only female that dresses professionally–the rest look like street walkers with their tight, sleeveless, low cute dresses and blouses. And when did panty hose become taboo? I guess Katie Couric was the one who started that. So unprofessional. 3/4 blonde lawyers are on the staff of fox.

        Good for Trump for standing up–after all he has no one to answer to and no one can touch him!

    • 136 Jan October 26, 2011 at 12:10 pm

      Heather, thanks for posting Greta and Trump’s interview. I was watching but missed the first part.

  48. 137 Durus October 26, 2011 at 9:11 am

    JustiaGate: CEO Tim Stanley Claims Innocence After Blocking Access To Wayback Machine Snapshots Of All Supreme Court Cases Published By Justia.

    Yesterday, in a stunning development, Justia CEO Tim Stanley blocked Wayback Machine access to all US Supreme Court cases published by This is the epitome – the textbook definition even – of hypocrisy. As Dianna Cotter previously reported:

    “Justia founder Tim Stanley has for years prided himself and his companies on principles of ‘freedom of information’. On June 19th, 2008, Stanley addressed the Legislative Council Committee at the Oregon State Legislature with the following…

    ‘In the end, we both recognize the importance of providing the public with online access to our nation’s laws because such actions promote understanding, participation in and respect for our democratic institutions and legal system.’

    Read more:

  49. 138 Jan October 26, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    Gov. of Wisconsin deserves a medal, we need 49 more just like him.
    Wisconsin re-born:

  50. 139 Jan October 26, 2011 at 12:12 pm

    This is a really great article covering the Constitutional Convention, Agenda 21, the OWS, etc.
    Excerpt from article:
    ”As I’ve stated many times before, a Constitutional Convention is fraught with risks and could easily spin out of control. It would very likely be hijacked by the elitists and then we’d end up with an anti-freedom agenda and a new constitution that would totally destroy the liberties our 1787 Constitution grants us. People…this means the entire Bill of Rights could disappear! Can you just imagine who we’d end up with on a Committee of Detail today, or the delegates from each state? It is the very people we oppose and that includes the phony right-wing like McCain, McConnell, and Boehner, and Snowe and Collins, not to mention Pelosi and Reid, Feinstein, Boxer and Schumer! God help us!
    What few people understand is the fact that the right wing is pushing a Constitutional Convention as well and has been for a long time. Their tactics are subtle and disarming with the conservative sounding Balanced Budget Amendment that could easily lead to a Constitutional Convention. There has also been a desire of the leftists to eliminate the Electoral College. In doing so, the smaller states would not have a voice in elections and we’d end up having the president elected by the most leftist populated states. In the 2012 election, Obama would remain president. [Link]”
    Read full article here:

  51. 140 Tenacity October 26, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    We have talked about being dumbed down and brain-soiled, but what does that mean? It means you have been conditioned to believe what the government and mainstream media tell you is mostly factual. It means you have learned to rely upon the government to solve your problems and take care of you when you face difficulties. You believe that the wars have been necessary and that God is not. You believe that paying taxes and diversity are patriotic. You believe that unions have the individual’s best interest at heart. You believe that Judaism is a race of people mentioned in the Bible as God’s chosen. You believe that 3 lettered organizations like the FDA, CIA & IRS are working for the People. You believe that judges are public servants. You believe the government agent judge when he tells you as a juror to JUST judge the facts of the case and he will advise you on the law. You believe that foreign aid is actually benefiting the poor of the world or serving the people’s interest in foreign policy. You believe that the Patriot Act has made you safer. You believe that the world trade center, Oklahoma City bombing and the JFK assassination were the doing of fanatics & foreign enemies. You believe that the Vatican is all about world peace and that secret societies are primarily benevolent organizations with pure intentions. You believe that the federal government has any business taking control of educating our kids. You believe that preachers’ 1st Amendment rights should be regulated by the IRS. You believe that Obama wants to soften anybody with kindness and humility. You believe what They* tell you about who and what the enemies are. You refer to them as a fanatical foreign influence when Them* are the very ones feeding you the propaganda and stealing the fruits of your production. You believe Them* when they marginalize anyone that stands against them. You are addicted to believing lies and unwittingly perpetrate the lies.

  52. 143 Durus October 26, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    No Certification Without Verification

    On 10/25/11 Liberty Legal Foundation filed two simultaneous lawsuits against the Democratic Party. Both lawsuits request injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election. Without such a certification from the Party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election.

    Read more:

  53. 144 Starla October 26, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    HomeLand Security Plans to Kill USA Citizens

    “HR 8791 – Homeland Terrorism Preparedness Bill”

    Listen at the 1:38 mark: “[…] a new Bill Of Rights shall be drafted and approved by – CLASSIFIED. Having now reviewed the bill, I ask you to please cast your votes.”

    A Comment Under This Video:

    “Did you hear that at the end? “A new BILL OF RIGHTS shall be drafted and approved by classified.” IOW your right to bear arms will end, your freedom of speech will end, search and siezure only with a GJ indictment will end, the right not to incriminate yourself will end, soldiers could occupy your home without consent of lawmakers, trial by jury of peers will end, etc. etc. – signalrambo 1 year ago”

    * * * *

    • 145 Troy October 26, 2011 at 6:46 pm

      Starla, the above video is a SPOOF!….You are not the first person to mistake it as being real….The first time I saw and listened to it I almost fell for it too….They make it seem almost real.

    • 147 Jan October 26, 2011 at 8:10 pm

      Last update was January 2011, but check out this illegal. Part 1 of three

      Part 2:

      Part 3:

  54. 148 Starla October 26, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    HomeLand Security Plans to Kill USA Citizens

    “HR 8791 – Homeland Terrorism Preparedness Bill”

    Listen at the 1:38 mark: “[…] a new BILL OF RIGHTS shall be drafted and approved by – CLASSIFIED. Having now reviewed the bill, I ask you to please cast your votes.”

    A Comment Under This Video:

    “Did you hear that at the end? “A new BILL OF RIGHTS shall be drafted and approved by classified.” IOW your right to bear arms will end, your freedom of speech will end, search and siezure only with a GJ indictment will end, the right not to incriminate yourself will end, soldiers could occupy your home without consent of lawmakers, trial by jury of peers will end, etc. etc. – signalrambo 1 year ago”

    * * * *

    Barack Obama’s Martial Law Plans Revealed!!

    * * * *

  55. 156 Starla October 26, 2011 at 3:49 pm





    “Why did the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY), whose Chairman was Stephen Friedman (a Goldman Sachs board member who resigned from the New York Fed earlier this year when it was revealed that he had made $5 million by purchasing shares in GS with the knowledge that AIG would be paying counterparties at par and that Goldman would be getting a $13 billion windfall — when no one else had this information) and whose President was none other than current Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, why did this New York Fed choose to pay AIG’s counterparties 100 cents on the dollar when AIG itself had been negotiating for steep haircuts with claimants, AND why did they then pressure AIG executives to keep quiet about the decision even discouraging AIG from disclosing the ‘par-payments’ to its shareholders in required SEC filings?

    Read More Here:

    * * * *

    • 157 Starla October 26, 2011 at 4:01 pm


      From: ~~ “Politics And Religion Radio” ~~


      * * * *


      * * * *


      * * * *

  56. 158 drkate October 26, 2011 at 4:32 pm

    Sheriff Joe update:

  57. 159 Papoose October 26, 2011 at 5:51 pm

    The Nobel Peace Prize
    What a hunk of junk.

    a charade. in your face. laugh out loud as a human microphone

    Where’s that maniac Michael Moore when you want a good Mockumentary when you need it?

    falling into nostagia

    green stamps. the way we were

    before we were plastic
    when evil was evil. dangerous. threatening.
    when telOprompters didn’t dictate.

    the kooks occupying space in your head, their right to are complaining:

    “Everyone knows we give out free food and sleeping bags, and it’s a perfect opportunity for squatters.”

    funny, that.

  58. 162 usapatriots-shout October 26, 2011 at 6:46 pm

    hat Obama, the assassination usurper does is no surprise to me. It was obvious when he was running he was going to do whatever he pleased at any price to the American people.

    America was founded on a checks and balances system that was supposed to prevent a president from becoming a murdered and violating the Constitution and the Congressional procedure. Most of America was secure that system was operating effectively. Thus the classic American cry: “This is America! It could never happen here!”

    That is exactly what happened “here”. What truly shocks and outrages me is the fact that those people in power and with the power to stop him did NOTHING for what ever lame excuse. They have stood by and done nothing, denied, avoided, supported, and lied for this killler. They are equally guilty in Obama crimes and now have blood on their hands.

  59. 163 Troy October 26, 2011 at 6:55 pm

    Sheriff Joe predicts Obama investigation to be a ‘shock’
    ‘There are a couple of things … that could be a little bit exciting’
    Posted: October 26, 2011
    8:54 pm Eastern

    By Jerome R. Corsi
    © 2011 WND

    The results of a formal law-enforcement investigation into whether Barack Obama is eligible to be president of the United States could come as a “shock,” according to Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

    Tuesday night, speaking to a tea-party group in Arizona, Arpaio said, “I can’t tell you everything, but there could be a shock there somewhere that my guys came up with. I can’t talk too much about it. It’s in the process.”

    WND previously has reported that Arpaio has constituted a special five-member law enforcement posse to investigate allegations brought by members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party that the birth certificate released to the public April 27 might be a forgery.

    Today only! Lowest price ever on signed copy of Jerome Corsi’s best-selling Obama-birth blockbuster, “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” Just $4.95!

    The posse, assembled under the authority of Arpaio’s office, consists of three former law enforcement officers and two retired attorneys with law enforcement experience. Members have been examining evidence since September concerning Obama’s eligibility to be president under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, which requires a president to be a natural-born citizen.

    He referenced disputes over the Social Security number attributed to the president and said, “There are a couple of things you and nobody else here knows anything about yet that could be a little bit exciting.”

    (Story continues below)
    Read more: Sheriff Joe predicts Obama investigation to be a ‘shock’

  60. 164 no-nonsense-nancy October 26, 2011 at 7:46 pm

    MoTus today on the hugh crowds Bo is drawing!

  61. 166 no-nonsense-nancy October 26, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    This would be a good one to caption. MO with a worm from the compost pile.

  62. 168 no-nonsense-nancy October 26, 2011 at 8:00 pm

    San Francisco Chronicle—- thinks there is a Nixonian quality to the level of control, paranoia and lack of credibility in regard to this White House’s issue of the media access to BO’s fundraisers. ????

  63. 171 no-nonsense-nancy October 26, 2011 at 8:05 pm

    Sorry, couldn’t resist this one!

    PS- In the norning I am off to DC to the convention on Soros.

  64. 172 heather October 26, 2011 at 8:13 pm

    And for the highlight of this go to and see his picture holding hands with all the entitlees.

    This is disgusting and congress will not approve this–stop his EOs!

  65. 174 heather October 26, 2011 at 8:25 pm,0,5790121.story

    Yiks–!! Wasn’t it OBL who tried to warn the American people back in 01 that our country would be destroyed from the inside out through our financial system? Sounds like he knew back then what this govt planned against us.

  66. 176 Tenacity October 26, 2011 at 10:46 pm

    Troy, I really appreciate you and others bringing so much real news. It takes time to research and filter out the chaff.

  67. 177 Starla November 6, 2011 at 2:26 pm

    Alex Jones Prays For Peoples Eyes To Open To Horror Of USA Wars

    “Obama Calls Murder of Children in Libya A “Success.” The hypocrisy of Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama bombing Libya, a war crime resulting in tens of thousands of deaths and the maiming of countless others.”

Comments are currently closed.

October 2011

Recent Comments

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: