Why Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and Karl Rove want Romney: Because he Loses to Obama

©2012 drkate

(Author’s Note.  Update from reader Troy, h/t Katie:  Katie says:
January 18, 2012 at 11:28 am (Edit)

That video about Romney was put out by a Newt SuperPAC, and it’s name is based on the book Gingrich published “Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America” in May of 2006. I just verified it at Amazon, and remember when the WH came out with their WtF slogan, Hot Air was all over the stupidity of it, not least of which it plagiarized the Gingrich title.

Thanks to reader Troy, we have to consider that the whole republican field is another set-up and illusion of an election, where Romney will be the nominee and he will lose to Obama.  Please study the comments and this video, and think long-term.  The ‘surge’ of this republican or that one is just what it is: a mirage to make us think we have a choice.  While you may not like Ron Paul, I do not believe he is a part of this as are Gingrich, Santorum, Perry, and Huntsman.  Cain presented the illusion of a threat and had to be eliminated by innuendo.  Huntsman dropped out and endorsed Romney.  Will Bachman be the next traitor to show her part of this charade?  😡 )

The notion that Mitt Romney routinely makes statements lacking a factual basis should not come as a surprise to anyone who has followed the campaign. On the left, Paul Krugman has marveled that no other candidate has ever “lied so freely, with so little compunction.” On the right, The American Conservative‘s Daniel Larison wondered about why he lies, concluding that the former Massachusetts governor is “so contemptuous of the people he tells lies to that he never thinks he will be found out.” 

Sounds just like Obama…so much contempt for America that he willingly lies.

Alarm bells should be ringing in everyone’s ears when Karl Rove, the establishment RINOs, GHW Bush, and democrats ‘praise’ Mitt Romney, or in the case of Nancy Piglosi, jeer at the republicans for their infighting over him.

Mitt Romney can’t climb above 25% in public opinion polls (to the extent that those are believable, it’s actually probably less than 25%), is endorsed by losers and NDAA sponsors like John McCain, and has been running for president for five years.  He’s playing it safe, trying to ‘look presidential’ and ‘grown-up’ and demonstrates his deception with every word he speaks.  His campaign slogan is deception pure and simple: ‘let’s fight for the America we love” (?)

While trying to run as a “CEO”, and ‘someone who has been in business’, and ‘knows how to create jobs’, let’s hear about Mitt Romney’s “creative destruction” of American business and jobs (h/t Bill):

Can you hear the guffaws as Romney lied in last night’s debate saying “get rid of Obamacare”?  Like the guffaws in the film above when he said that the money in corporations goes to the people?  Can you hear the democrats focusing on Romney’s corporate savagery as a convenient distraction from Obama’s savaging of America?

There are no degrees of separation between Obama and Romney.  They both think they are entitled to the presidency, and they both have the media doing everything in their power to enable the continued destruction of the Constitution.  The rinos, dinos, Rovians all want Romney to be the nominee because he will lose to Obama….and if by some miracle he wins, so that the continued theft of America and destruction of the Constitution will escalate.

By the way, did you notice that a questioner in the South Carolina debate asked Romney about his father being born outside the United States, and segued that into a discussion of immigration?  Do you notice they will never ask what a ‘natural born citizen’ is?  How many of us tweeted that question to be totally ignored?  The media and republicans are scared to death of that subject.

C H I C K E N S.

That's a lot of chicken sh** on the national stage!

206 Responses to “Why Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and Karl Rove want Romney: Because he Loses to Obama”

  1. 1 Troy January 17, 2012 at 8:18 pm

    The Obot administration knew they were going to be running against Romney even before we did….That is why they created and endorsed the OWS movement – to go after Romney and secure a win for Barry….They are the ones who produced the above video….Now ask yourself this – How did they, so long ago, know that Romney is who they’d be going up against?…Hmmm?….How did they KNOW that?….Seems we have a problem here, doesn’t it?

    • 2 drkate January 17, 2012 at 8:23 pm

      Excellent point… once GHW Bushie came out with the endorsement it was clear to me..

      • 3 Troy January 17, 2012 at 8:41 pm

        Think about it all very carefully:

        OWS movement was created by the Soros bunch way before the GOP race began…..It’s people like who is portrayed in the above video that they despise….No one could figure out why the Dems and white house so openly endorsed the group / movement that was / is so unpopular with middle America.

        Remember Obama’s slogan a while back – “Winning the Future”
        Listen at the end of the video who it was created by….This video was made for one purpose and one purpose only – to fuel the OWS firestorm that is set to resume after winter is over with.


        We’re being set-up again.

        • 4 Troy January 17, 2012 at 8:47 pm

          Moral of the story: The Dems knew long ago that Romney is who they would be running against….How did they know that?….I’ll tell you how – it’s all effing fake!!!!….It’s all an illusion….There is no real election….They are just making it appear that there is…..It has all been decided by the elites long ago and we have NO say in it….The joke is on us AGAIN!!!

          • 5 no-nonsense-nancy January 17, 2012 at 8:55 pm

            You are right, Troy. This has been going on for lot of years. How do we break the cycle? It is the establishment dem, repub, dem, etc. The powers-that-be pick our elected officials.We need to chase them all out of Dodge.

          • 6 drkate January 17, 2012 at 9:00 pm

            Thank you Troy, I’ve just updated the post to reflect your comments. This is very, very important. 😯

            • 7 Troy January 17, 2012 at 9:30 pm

              Thanks, Dr. Kate….The video, at the end, says it was created by “Winning Our Future”…..One of Obama’s new slogans, rolled out at a gathering in Arizona, was “Winning the Future” and it was even seen on tee-shirts at that event….I believe this is a Soros backed group pushing this…..This is just a guess on my part, given the coincidence of the name of the group who put out the video….They do give a www. website to go to at the end of the video….I have not checked out that website, but I’ll be VERY surprised if it is not exactly who I think it is…..Not so much put out by the OWS movemnt, but put out by the people pushing that movement, a.k.a. Soros, for fuel to add to the fire….Someone can have a looksky and tell me if I’m wrong.

              • 8 drkate January 17, 2012 at 9:32 pm

                The event in Tucson was right after the Giffords shooting and murder of Judge Roll…

              • 9 heather January 17, 2012 at 11:28 pm

                It’s called winningourfuture.com

                • 10 Troy January 18, 2012 at 7:25 am

                  I went to the website and it says that it is a SuperPac in support of Newt Gingrich….It’s very interesting that they chose Obama’s slogan as their name….Supposedly candidates have no control over SuperPacs and are not associated with them, so it could still be the Obama crew posing as Newt supporters….I hate politics!

    • 11 heather January 17, 2012 at 11:16 pm

      Hmmm-do you think that Bush Sr has a LIST of who they want?

      Love the chickens–thinking they are called Rhode Island Reds!

      If Romney wins the nomination then we can hang it up because barry will win. Please please vote RP and pray everyone else does to.

  2. 12 Troy January 17, 2012 at 9:04 pm

    I have seen comments on several blogs inquiring about Lame Cherry….I was never an avid reader of The Lame One, but out of curiosity I went to the link http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/ and read the final post and the read the few preceding posts….It is my gut feeling that Lame Cherry said good-bye and is no longer with us / of this earth.

    Just my take from what I saw and read.

    • 13 drkate January 17, 2012 at 9:07 pm

      He has ‘dusted off his shoes” read Matthew…he is here, but my take is that he’s done writing…and/or his Mom is very ill. I wish him God Speed wherever he is.

      • 14 heather January 17, 2012 at 11:22 pm

        I said a couple of threads ago when he was asked about that I thought his mother was ill–he had been caring for her….but let’s pray he comes back and starts writing again.

      • 15 heather January 17, 2012 at 11:37 pm

        Went back and read quite a few of his last articles and it is a possibility he is no longer on this earth.

        • 16 Ann January 18, 2012 at 9:27 am

          Hear the Word of the Lord.

          I will not most likely be doing this much longer my children. If the plagiarists and intelligence structure wants for the information, they will have to pay for it as they do all things in filtering Mockingbird cash to this blog or a benefactor will be moved to step up, as it is approaching the time that I will knock the dust off my packs and cinch the saddle and then will come the time you will grope in the dark at noonday in your Limbaugh’s and Obama’s have not the Prophesies for you, that have been mocked here.

          It sounds like he/she is disgusted and has stopped blogging for free. At least that’s my take on it. I’ve never been able to fully understand the articles there so I stopped reading. Obviously I don’t have the brain power to figure out some of the obtuse writing. lol


          Scroll down to about half of the page for the full article.

  3. 17 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:08 pm

    Thanks for the new thread alert Troy.

    Romney is very scary. He is a man without a conscience. He helped write the obamadeath(care) sic. This is remniscent of Nazi Germany. Mittens is scarier than barry soetoro and that says alot.
    Check out what this doctor is saying about the death panels.

    Oh My God!

  4. 18 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:10 pm

    Did you know that Romney BRAGS about his support of the NDAA Bill that kills the bill of rights and the constitution?

  5. 19 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:18 pm

    False Flag occured by 500 paid OWS workers…..they threw smoke bombs over the WH fence while the obummers were conveniently out on the town for Moocher’s B day. No arrests were made. How convenient. News says WH is in lock down.

  6. 21 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:40 pm

    Aw (Gushing)

    Ron Paul knocked it out of the park in the debates last night.
    Love him. Hate Romney.
    NNN will love this.

  7. 22 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:44 pm

    shoot wrong vid……Here is Ron Paul at the debates last night.
    Let me try again.

  8. 23 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:44 pm


    • 24 Tenacity January 18, 2012 at 10:17 am

      The sad part of this is that some in the Tea Party are buying into the misinformation being disseminated by the establishment GOP and media. They* keep putting words in Dr. Paul’s mouth and lying about his positions, particularly on defense spending. When he mentioned a “golden rule” policy, there were two kinds of boos from the audience: establishment provocateurs and red, white & blue fever.

  9. 25 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:48 pm

    Twinkle toes the evil greedy prick Romney just kept on smiling like a school girl in love…..’can’t stand Mitt twinkle toes moron-Mass got rid of him for a reason..

  10. 26 10amendment January 17, 2012 at 9:54 pm

    Hi, Dr. Kate,

    Seems most do NOT remember , Romney was promised he would be next in line as Republican Nominee if he dropped out of the race for McCain . So it has been planned since 2008 that it would be Romney as the establishment nominee this time around .. I remember when he was convinced to drop out and what he was told . back then . So this is NO surprise to me at all.

  11. 27 Quantum Leap January 17, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    A new CNN poll once again debunks the myth that Ron Paul is not electable, showing the Congressman tied with Mitt Romney in a hypothetical head to head contest against Barack Obama.

    “The poll also indicates Paul statistically tied with Obama, with the president at 48% and the longtime congressman at 46%,” reports CNN. “But according to the poll, the president is doing better against two other Republican presidential candidates. If Rick Santorum were the GOP nominee, Obama would hold a 51%-45% advantage over the former senator from Pennsylvania. And if Newt Gingrich faced off against the president, Obama would lead the former House speaker 52%-43%.”


  12. 28 10amendment January 17, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    And I would like to add this….. IS… the way establishment GOP works, They plan the next nominee’s years in advance .

  13. 30 Jan January 17, 2012 at 10:00 pm

    When I read that Mitt had attended a Bilderberger meeting last year, I started saying he would be the pick for pres candidate. I just wonder, if the voting machines can only change votes by 5pts, what will they do?
    What excuse will the RNC give if they don’t put Paul on the ballot?

    However, with the court case in GA and the states that are now challenging obat getting on the ballot, maybe Martial Law will come sooner than we think.

  14. 31 Jan January 17, 2012 at 11:59 pm

    Ron Paul predicts from 2002 – this pretty well explains his foreign policy

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM Ron Paul predicts in 2002

  15. 33 bill January 18, 2012 at 8:00 am

    OT but sober talk by Ron Paul
    Ron Paul. Romney & Gingrich Just Woudn’t Get This. Gold, Silver & Free Market

  16. 34 Tenacity January 18, 2012 at 10:44 am

    Dr. Paul is a very wise man. The “establishment”, the bankster elite, has used the power to control money via a fiat currency issued by the privately held federal reserve to accomplish ALL of their agendas. This is the key to breaking the Luciferian cabal’s enslavement of the middle class of America. No sound money, no standing. We must attain “standing” in order to enforce all breaches of the constitution, such as eligibility. In the absence of sound money, the only alternative is physical force which is unpleasant, a great risk, morally questionable and unnecessary if people will unite and insist on a constitutional government. Dr. Paul singularly offers leadership for that united effort.

  17. 35 Troy January 18, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    Update on my theory regarding the Romney video posted by Dr. Kate.
    Katie says:
    January 18, 2012 at 11:28 am (Edit)

    That video about Romney was put out by a Newt SuperPAC, and it’s name is based on the book Gingrich published “Winning the Future: A 21st Century Contract With America” in May of 2006. I just verified it at Amazon, and remember when the WH came out with their WtF slogan, Hot Air was all over the stupidity of it, not least of which it plagiarized the Gingrich title.

  18. 37 heather January 18, 2012 at 2:43 pm

    OT- can they rub it in out faces anymore? A 10oz steak?—I can barely eat a 6 oz filet. She’s a hog.


      • 44 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 7:34 pm

        I already told you he’s a closet dem which is why Mass voted for him for governor. Someone needs to tell her to warn the Tea partiers.

        How can Nikki Haley endorse Willard? Is she stupid? Oh she got paid off and rewarded a committeee position unheard of for a Jr. Congressperson.

        Why is Sarah now endorsing Newt? Is it a secret ploy to kick Romney to the curb so Dr Paul can win? Dream on.

        Watch what they accuse Dr Paul of (i.e. he’s a libertarian when he’s not) and you’ll know what they themselevs are guilty of and hiding. (i.e. Mitt is a Democrat —–posing as a repub)

        Mitt (Willard) Romney was for it before he was against it. If he’s from Mass he’s a die hard dem and don’t you forget it.

        • 45 drkate January 18, 2012 at 8:17 pm

          Nikki Haley is a governor, not representative, Gov of SC

        • 47 drkate January 18, 2012 at 8:25 pm

          Re: Sarah Palin endorsing Newt…this seems plausible is to knock out Mitt for a Ron Paul win…because Newt’s ability to beat Obama is worse than every other candidate except Sick Rantorum.

          • 48 Troy January 18, 2012 at 11:18 pm

            I think Newt’s chances of beating Obama are far greater than Romney’s.

            RP actually has the best chance of beating Obama, as MANY young voters and black voters would be siphoned away from Barry.

            • 49 drkate January 19, 2012 at 10:32 am

              Actually you may be right. If Newt doesn’t get too arrogant he’d decimate Obama in the debates. Now we’ll see what his ex has to say.

        • 50 Troy January 18, 2012 at 11:14 pm

          Watch what they accuse Dr Paul of (i.e. he’s a libertarian when he’s not)
          RP is a fiscally conservative Libertarian and is not shy about saying so….I have no problem with that…..Too many people confuse Libertarianism with what has now become labeled as Liberalism….They are not the same thing.

      • 51 drkate January 18, 2012 at 9:33 pm

        Thank you QL–this is a terrific video. It is captured for permanent viewing on vpod————>

  19. 52 sandstone January 18, 2012 at 3:23 pm

    Just curious, is Romney even eligible to run for POTUS? Heard his father was born in Mexico.

    • 53 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 7:36 pm

      No he’s not eligible. He’s not a natural born citizen. That’s another issue besides him being a closeted democrat.

      • 54 drkate January 18, 2012 at 8:20 pm

        Check out the Obama file, Romney IS a NBC. It does us no good to go after Romney this way, as it is a distraction and undermines the efforts on Obama’s ineligibility.

      • 55 Tenacity January 18, 2012 at 8:37 pm

        The correct answer is; if his grandparents became Mexican citizens and Mitt’s (Willard) father (George) did not naturalized prior to 1947 in the U.S. as Willard’s father, George, was born in Mexico, then Willard would have been born of a Mexican father and not a natural born citizen. There is no record that George ever naturalized, but some believe he was a U.S. citizen. The record must be verified. The research that has been done indicates that Mitt’s grandfather “settled” in Mexico for over 2 decades and by law, if not by formal naturalization, became a Mexican citizen. If that is the case, then George (Mitt’s dad) was born a Mexican citizen and not subject to the U.S. George Romney served as Governor of Michigan. It may be that since George Romney’s parents had at one time been U.S. citizens, assumptions may have been made that George was born a U.S. citizen on foreign soil and was never vetted or made to naturalize. As you can see, the answer to your question is gray and not black and white. It is relevant that Mitt’s grandparents were polygamists and fled to Mexico to escape the jurisdiction of U.S. law. They were part of a missionary settlement with intent to permamently expatriate and negotiated the right to stay in Mexico on that basis. Thus there is good reason to believe that they officially became Mexican citizens.

        • 56 drkate January 18, 2012 at 8:43 pm

          Beg to differ:

          Pleae guys, this is The Obama File. It is not a general-discussion conservative website.

          I made the same mistake myself by responding to eligibility questions first surfaced about Romney, and responded thusly:

          George Romney was born in a Mormon colony in Chihuahua, Mexico, to American citizen parents which bestowed American citizenship upon him (Jus sanguinis). Although a citizen, George Romney was never a “natural born” citizen.

          When George Romney’s parents fled the United States with their children because of the federal government’s opposition to polygamy they did not lose their American citizenship.

          Gaskell Romney, George Romney’s father, was born on September, 22 1871, in St. George, Washington, Utah. He’s an American citizen by birth.

          Anna Amelia Pratt Romney, George Romney’s mother, was born on May 6, 1876, in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake, Utah. She’s an American citizen by birth and marriage — remember this is pre-19th Amendment, when a woman’s citizenship was derived from her husband’s.

          Mitt Romney’s parents were both American citizens when Mitt was born in Detroit, Michigan on March 12, 1947.

          One thing that ther Mormons get right is genealogy.

          Mitt Romney was born in the USA (jus solis) of American citizen parents (Jus sanguinis) and is eligible to serve as POTUS.

          Belive me, if he wasn’t, you’d read it here first.

          Although that analysis is correct, I made a mistake by posting it, because it has nothing to do with Obama (90% content), the political Left (5%) or Islamists and jihad (5%).

          If you wish to discuss the eligibility of Romney, Santorum, Rubio or Jindal, please visit http://www.FreeRebublic. com.

          Discussing this issue on The Obama File takes us off topic — Obama!

          In the future, all threads that delve into Non-Obama issues will be locked.

          I don’t like doing this, but I feel it is necessary to keep our focus on the enemy — Barack Obama and his friends in the political Left and jihad.

  20. 58 SallyAl January 18, 2012 at 3:46 pm

    The latest from WHI/Ulsterman will blow you away!

  21. 80 Paula January 18, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    Good stuff, Dr. Kate. Keep shining that light on the evildoers and their deceptions:o) I wish I could get all liberty loving Americans to read this blog:o)

  22. 81 Troy January 18, 2012 at 5:31 pm


    Wed Jan 18 2012 18:47:14 ET

    Marianne Gingrich has said she could end her ex-husband’s career with a single interview. Earlier this week, she sat before ABCNEWS cameras, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

    She spoke to ABCNEWS reporter Brian Ross for two hours. Her explosive revelations are set to rock the campaign. But now a “civil war” has erupted inside of the network, an insider claims, on exactly when the confession will air!

    ABCNEWS suits determined it would be “unethical” to run the Marianne Gingrich interview so close to the South Carolina Primary, a curious decision, one insider argued, since the network has aggressively been reporting on other candidates.

    A decision was tentatively made to air the interview next Monday, after all votes have been counted.


  23. 85 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    Have you all seen the vid called “Nancy Pelosi-GOP knows mitt can’t beat obama”

    She’s all giggly and if you want my oipinion this is proof that mitt was paid off to run and shut the others out. They are cehating the vote counting I’m sure but I have no proof. Mitt can’t get more than 25% support on a good day in a good year. It may not be on your tube yet but you cna google it. She makes me sick.

  24. 91 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 9:01 pm

    I think I know who insider is. He was on Billy clintons campaign and is Jewish. His name rhymes with Rick. He’s now a fat news commentator on his own and not with any network. He hates Obummer and alwys has. He’s a Clintonite.

    • 92 drkate January 18, 2012 at 9:11 pm

      Dick Morris???

      • 93 Troy January 18, 2012 at 10:00 pm

        It has always been my belief that the WH insider is James Carville.

        • 94 Troy January 18, 2012 at 10:05 pm

          When I read the insider’s words – the foul language, the figures of speech and slang, I can just hear Carville’s voice as plain as day….In fact, every time I read the next installment from Ulsterman, I automatically read the Insider’s words with Carville’s voice stuck in my head…..And that ain’t pleasant!

          • 95 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 10:11 pm

            No it’s Dick. He’s fat now. What’s his last name. Carville is not jewish. insider is Jewish.

          • 98 Troy January 18, 2012 at 10:19 pm

            Although, in this latest installment from Ulsterman, the insider did say that he was an east coaster…..Carville is a coon-ass / cajun, so that kind of throws a monkey wrench into my theory.

            • 99 Tenacity January 19, 2012 at 1:50 am

              Plus, neither Carville nor Morris worked on the Obama campaign. Whoever WHI insider is, assuming they are a real person at all, they claim to have worked on the S/Ob’s campaign. I’m beginning to believe it is Ulsterman’s 2nd or 3rd personality. Maybe its one of his Illuminati dissociated night personalities. Whoever he/she is, they are either short on class and brains or they play a good loose lipped drunk…drunk on ego if not alcohol. If they are real, they are playing Ulsterman like a fiddle. Have him begging for little morsels of stories and really don’t tell him squat. They keep baiting the hook and Ulsterman acts like a hungry grouper. Neither one of the egos have the smarts to understand Dr. Paul. If they don’t know any better or more than what they say, they don’t have a clue about much of anything except I think they’ve got the Wookie pegged.

        • 103 Ann January 20, 2012 at 10:35 pm

          Mine, too Troy!! Part 3 is now up and it’s a doozy! After you read it check out the links in the comments & you’ll see it’s real. At least I think it is.

      • 104 heather January 18, 2012 at 10:08 pm

        Good guess Dr Kate–mine too!

      • 105 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 10:32 pm


      • 107 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 11:05 pm

        Yes Dk Morris

    • 108 drkate January 18, 2012 at 9:36 pm

      Did you catch the WH insider report…sort of having the light come on re Ron Paul and the anti-war left? A set up to take it from the dinos and rinos with the strong anti-war movement…or am I dreaming?

      Another great poster idea for Ron Paul: “DON’T WANT WWIII? VOTE RON PAUL!”

      • 109 Quantum Leap January 18, 2012 at 10:08 pm

        So they can preserve their financial interests knowing the global collapse will take away their cushy lives……?

        It’s really Paul in first then Gingrich in second. The Media is making stuff up. They better get their shyt together cause they are first on the list to go to the fema camps via NDAA. It’s time they bash obummer but good.

      • 111 heather January 18, 2012 at 10:10 pm

        Yes I did…now I was thinking that TPTB want RP—that was my thought–anyone else?

        • 112 misstickly January 20, 2012 at 10:58 pm

          Well, I admit I have stumbled on some curious roadsigns lately. Signs that say there may actually be a radical, fringe middle road…


          • 113 drkate January 20, 2012 at 11:05 pm

            Hello Miss Tickly! Greetings and best wishes to you!

            I think its very interesting…perhaps TPTB need to hide for a while as they won’t make much money on an American revolution that boots them and their agents out…

            Also, interesting that WHI has an ‘a-ha’ moment on the anti-war left also putting Ron Paul in front…

            • 114 misstickly January 20, 2012 at 11:16 pm

              Ron Paul can easily beat Obama. But, what happens if we find out they walk the same road? Nothing is as it seems, Dr. Kate. It wasn’t with Obama, and it’s not with Ron Paul.

              And since I happen to like Ron Paul, am I going to be ok with that?

              (5min 37sec.)…

              • 115 drkate January 20, 2012 at 11:21 pm

                Yes, we have to be ok with that because…it is going to happen anyway, I’ve always felt that. We are the ones that must make this change…I think Paul would be a better facilitator of that change than what we have now. But it is so much bigger, even bigger than our constitution.

                • 116 misstickly January 20, 2012 at 11:28 pm

                  “We are the ones that must make this change…”

                  They aren’t going to let us. They have hijacked our election technology.

                  Follow the debossed seal and you will find where all of Obama’s friends have been hiding. They’ve been playing pretend while we pay them to hack our votes.

                  No one is sorry than I am to find that Ron Paul has as many question marks as the man who calls himself ‘Barack Obama.’

                  In 2012, I endorse your precious, sacred vote.

                  • 117 drkate January 20, 2012 at 11:32 pm

                    Agreed on the likelihood of the vote stealing–its already happened and a set up. But its something more now, even with this stealing I do believe there is an awakening that will transcend this mess…when you can share what you know I’m all ears, send to my blog at gmail…

        • 119 misstickly January 20, 2012 at 11:04 pm

          If the message is the same – there aren’t even two parties that are identical any more. There is just One.

          (5min 37sec.), (5min 37sec.), (5min 37sec.), (5min 37sec.)…

          • 120 Tenacity January 21, 2012 at 1:22 pm

            Miss Tickly, I believe the “Nothing is as it seems” with Dr. Paul is in a different direction than the “Politicians.” If you have read Larkin Rose’s book, The Iron Web, you will immediately know what I mean. Keep in mind that Dr. Paul wrote the forward to Dr. Edwin Vieira’s book, Pieces of Eight. My point is that for several decades, not only has he been 100% consistent in his voting record, but he has been conversing with some of our top constitutionalist even before it was a popular movement. I sincerely believe that Dr. Paul knows more than what he can say. We are in a serious spiritual battle and as Pat Shannan reveals in his book, Everything They* Ever Told Me Was a Lie. Dr. Paul understands the real causes of all of our historical military conflicts and precisely how we got into the economic ambush that has escalated like the frog in the pot since the founding of our republic. I understand his dilemma since I have done my research and find few immediately willing to accept the truth. If you believe a candidate like RP has been marginalized now, what do you think They* would do to a candidate that mentioned Luciferians, Magna Charta, the influence of the papacy, Nazis, NLP, CIA conditioned MPD, fraudulent ratifications of Amendments, the original 13th, or the real reasons for the war on drugs? I agree, nothing is as it seems and sometimes it has to be that way to do what is right.

  25. 121 drkate January 18, 2012 at 9:19 pm

    OT, prediction for south carolina:

    real winner, Ron Paul
    Media reporting:

    …on second thought, media will probably call it a tie between gingrich and romney, with Paul in third place but ignored as they focus on who came in fourth…

  26. 123 drkate January 18, 2012 at 10:04 pm

    OT, but topic of upcoming post



    • 124 no-nonsense-nancy January 19, 2012 at 9:30 am

      That is a very interesting article, Kate. I guess I have been bunked all these years that I have been paying for my house!

  27. 125 Quantum Leap January 19, 2012 at 1:25 am

    That’s some story at ulsterman’s huh? The site is heavily monitored.

    We have a drug addict posing as president. Just great. I hope he pops all the poppers he can get his hands on and loads his nostrils up with tons of coke. Have at it. Let him blow out his liver out by his own hands. And his supposed wife wants to tell people what to eat while her acting dope addict husband takes illegal drugs to his hearts content. We don’t deserve this charade.
    There is something that may be from FBI posted there in the comments section.
    From 934Penn..stand down. This is your only warning…….etc. posted at 1:34 Eastern time. Jan 19.

    Oh and Nightline had a great show on willard romney’s offshore accounts.
    Oh Willllllllllllard………dinner is ready…….Willard? Willard where are you? er….Who are you?

    This is getting interesting.
    It’s not our fault. We are just little people watching the show.

    Talk about the dope addict blinking alot. Willard does it too. Hmmmmmm.

    • 126 heather January 19, 2012 at 4:10 am

      Well Sarah Palin said the demands are being made that VETTING candidates are critical, as barry was never vetted. Heard that statement on Rush yesterday.

  28. 127 Tenacity January 19, 2012 at 2:00 am

    If Ulsterman and/or WHI weren’t on the take, then Ulsterman would have been followed and WHI would be found in a dumpster or suicided somewhere by now. WHI has given enough clues to have been reduced to a small number (dozen or so) of people to pick from. If he’s trying to stay anonymous, he is failing big time. If I was Bill Clinton, I guaranty you I would know exactly who WHI is by now.

  29. 128 Paula January 19, 2012 at 7:17 am

    Don’t know how helpful this is, but I’ll post this Grassfire Nation petition for helping Sheriff Arpaio in case anyone here hasn’t seen it and wants to support it:


  30. 129 Troy January 19, 2012 at 9:05 am

    Breaking: Perry dropping out and endorsing Gingrich

  31. 130 Drew January 19, 2012 at 12:54 pm

    Obama Gives Defense Secrets to Our Enemies!

    Dick MorrisTV: Lunch ALERT!

    • 131 heather January 19, 2012 at 1:09 pm

      That is treason on barrys part–we are at war in afganastan–and hes giving our top secrets away–bill clinton sold some to the chinese for 500m which he pocketed.

      If congress and the senate are so hell bent against this then it is up to them to have him arrested NOW not later.

    • 132 Quantum Leap January 19, 2012 at 10:05 pm

      Here ya go DrKate. I’m taking bets. re: insider. Dick…I don’t want to telegraph it in case he goes missing.

      Yep obummer works for Russia. Luger knows.

      Ron Paul 2012!

  32. 133 heather January 19, 2012 at 4:17 pm

    So Perry drops out today and endorses Newt. Well Perry didn’t want to be in the race to begin with it seems to me, as he entered late. Down to 4…..

  33. 134 heather January 19, 2012 at 4:19 pm

    OT–still can’t find anything on LC–been looking and there is nothing…I guess he/she has left this earth as Dr Kate mentioned.

    Will miss his writings.

  34. 135 Tenacity January 19, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    Walls In Our Minds Tonight @ 8 Central, 7 Mountain time.
    The Hidden 4th Branch

    We are joined tonight by Author Kelly Z. Mordecai. We will be discussing the 4th Branch – Grand Juries!

    Show Link: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2012/01/20/drkates-revolution-radio-walls-in-our-minds

  35. 136 heather January 19, 2012 at 8:15 pm

    Debate was great tonight–RP is still the only one who has never had to change his thoughts and agendas–he has more morals in his pinky than anyone on that stage.

    • 137 drkate January 19, 2012 at 8:18 pm

      so who do you think the media will annoint, Romney, and can they do that with a straight face tonight?

      • 138 drkate January 19, 2012 at 8:18 pm

        or will they say gingrich then paul, then romney?

        • 139 heather January 19, 2012 at 8:45 pm

          i think gingrich, romney, paul—even though RP had more interaction with the audience. RP was appauled more than any of them in my estimation. santorum is hard to tell–he’s a hot head at times. yes, he thinks before he speaks, which is a good thing but I can’t tell about him. they all make promises until they are elected then its all about them. gingrich did say that barry is a very dangerous radical, alinsky type and we cannot allow him 4 more yrs.

          hard to tell — i felt that cnn did a decent job making sure all 4 got to answer and then debate.

          i dont think romney is to well liked–the people can see through him, I believe–let’s say that, S Carolinans are humble people and RP met their morals.

          of course this is MHO only.

  36. 140 no-nonsense-nancy January 19, 2012 at 8:57 pm

    These stupid people should have known what the fraud was before they gave him so much money and forced him on all Americans. I don’t feel the least bit sorry for them. Just a little too late.


    • 141 heather January 19, 2012 at 9:02 pm

      yeah NNN i heard this tonight and LOL — maybe they are coming to terms with the 1% ers!! Do they now finally realize they are the ones who will have to pay for the entitlees! Oh crap–wth–they make millions before their movies even come out–so they can well afford a hit–but hopefully they may be waking up to the cold hard reality that not everything is a rose garden outside of hollywood!!!

      I don’t think it has anything to do with online piracy, I think they are dumbfounded that they are so dumb that they voted for him! lmao!!!

    • 142 drkate January 19, 2012 at 9:07 pm

      you know who sponsored these bills? MARCO RUBIO!

      • 143 heather January 19, 2012 at 9:32 pm

        yes he did and last night he said he refused to sign them that he decided they were bad bills. BUT he still sponsored them and that speaks volumns.

  37. 144 heather January 19, 2012 at 9:38 pm

    ot- did anyone see this or hear about this today? while the people are concentrating on the campaigns the sleezt govt is spreading disease throughout the country. this is just the first of this drop–once this gets out, who knows how many other states will allow this…….or do we already have these diseases falling on us from the chemtrails? i guess we don’t know what else are in those chemtrails do we.


    • 146 no-nonsense-nancy January 20, 2012 at 7:03 am

      Remember when theIinsider was describing the incident of Obama being dragged into a room for an hour or so in denver? Maybe he was undergoing hypnosis or mind control of some sort in order to go out on the stage and ‘perform’ like he did! Was it the CIA that the friend of Insider witnessed?

      • 147 heather January 20, 2012 at 1:34 pm

        No don’t think so–I remember the cia being outside the door and barry (?)going inside with 2 women. I wondered if it was his double—-so much for the scar that runs down the back of his head.

        • 148 heather January 20, 2012 at 1:37 pm

          Oddly enough NNN not one of them can be trusted. Not only are they liars, they cheat, rob, sneak, manipulate and he is nothing but drama. Of course I believe the drama is an added feature to distract from the massive destruction he is doing.

  38. 149 Tenacity January 19, 2012 at 9:51 pm

    This is a friend of ours being interviewed. He was a SC delegate to Continental Congress 2009.

  39. 150 drkate January 19, 2012 at 10:31 pm


  40. 151 Quantum Leap January 19, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    Obama is considering nominating Lawrence Summers, his former National Economic Council director, to lead the World Bank when Robert Zoellick’s term expires later this year, according to two people familiar with the matter.


  41. 155 Quantum Leap January 20, 2012 at 12:14 am

    It’s video freaky Friday. 😉 😀

  42. 161 Quantum Leap January 20, 2012 at 11:04 am

    Congressman Paul said Congress routinely over-spends: “It would be nice if we could just blame everything on the current administration or even the previous administration,” Paul said. “But the crisis that we are in has been building for a long period of time and it’s very bipartisan.

    “There’s been way too much cooperation in this Congress. Those who like spending cooperate and keep spending. For a long time we were able to get away with this because we were a very wealthy country. Now we’re non-productive, the good jobs are overseas and yet the spending is escalating exponentially.” He added, “You can’t solve the problem of debt by accumulating more debt.”

    Paul is taking the lead among his competitors in fighting for the interests of present and future taxpayers


  43. 162 no-nonsense-nancy January 20, 2012 at 2:09 pm

    If this lady were alive today can you just imagine how outspoken she would be concerning the state of our union?


  44. 174 no-nonsense-nancy January 20, 2012 at 3:10 pm

  45. 175 Tenacity January 20, 2012 at 3:41 pm

    “Obama has to appear in a Georgia Court next week to show his birth document and other records”

    I’ll believe this when I see it happen. On the other hand, I may not believe it even if I see it.

  46. 181 Jan January 20, 2012 at 4:00 pm

    Good one, surprise, surprise

    The AP wrote a libelous article.

  47. 184 Troy January 20, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    Just a hunch here, but I think if the judge in Georgia really does follow through with the subpoena evidence phase, then he was given the nod / order to let it happen….By who and for what purpose or outcome, I don’t know.

    • 185 Tenacity January 20, 2012 at 7:38 pm

      Very possible Troy, hard to speculate.

      • 186 Troy January 20, 2012 at 7:59 pm

        I can’t imagine it being anything more than HIGHLY likely…..After all this time we have a judge with a spine going rogue and thumbing his nose at the criminal syndicate machine?….I seriously doubt it….I smell a rat!

    • 187 drkate January 20, 2012 at 8:00 pm

      It is a set-up, imho. I’ll stick with my earlier scenario. Watch GA have some kind of ‘accident’ at a military base, or not; the judge or his family taken out; GA loses all its federal funding.

      Let’s see, Newt is from Georgia, right?

      Is the GA primary that important for Obama? No. Is it for the presidential election? No. If Obama doesn’t make it on the ballot in GA for the presidential election, so what?

      Something is up, and it has nothing to do with getting Obama out.

      In the meantime, Orly is saying ‘she won’, when the work hasn’t even begun yet. She’d better start working on her questioning onf Obama if he shows. We have won nothing yet.

      • 188 heather January 20, 2012 at 9:09 pm

        I tend to agree, this could be a set-up, but for what and why?

        • 189 heather January 20, 2012 at 9:13 pm

          Barry will not win over Newt–Newt is too slick—and knows to much. Barry will lose.

          Is this tptb way of getting rid of barry by bringing in Newt? Like QL stated above, if barry continues the destruction of our country, then there is nothing left for them—they must allow America to rise again so they can do a repeat of this in the near future. Thats MHO.

        • 190 drkate January 20, 2012 at 9:13 pm

          (1) separation of cases–so the NBC issue goes straight to the supreme court, which rules O is eligible
          (2) hearing evidence–so it is discredited finally and forever…playing on attys emotions, etc

  48. 191 Troy January 20, 2012 at 8:06 pm

    In the meantime, Orly is saying ‘she won’, when the work hasn’t even begun yet. She’d better start working on her questioning onf Obama if he shows. We have won nothing yet.
    I admire Orly VERY much, but lets face it, she is not the right person to conduct the next phases of this legal battle….I’m glad there are a couple of other attorneys, independent of her, who are also involved in the proceedings.

    I wish Orly would be smart and turn it over to Mario from this point forward.

  49. 193 uguesswhat January 20, 2012 at 8:07 pm

    RON PAUL IS THE CHOICE OF THE TROOPS! (Veterans & Active Duty march on the White House)

    • 194 drkate January 20, 2012 at 8:11 pm

      Excellent. Betcha you won’t see that corker JB Williams or patriots union there, or “General” Vallely.

    • 195 heather January 20, 2012 at 9:34 pm

      awesome,— military intervention–military coup? when will they come to save us?

      and will they count the absentee ballots and let our military voice their choice–or will they conveniently lose them again.

  50. 197 Jan January 20, 2012 at 9:25 pm

    Excellent article: Ron Paul 2012: Defeat the Elites!

    Published January 21, 2012 | By Jim O’Neill


    • 200 drkate January 20, 2012 at 10:03 pm

      The picture is that of a shattered Lame Cherry….he has been mocked, not listened to, and not taken seriously even though this person is prophetic and very well informed. He’s not going to give LImbaaugh, Levin, or the powers that be any more information. If a benefactor steps up, he may come back.

      He may have been given permission to stop writing for a while, or to care for his mother. I believe he is still here on this earth but on to better things than trying to educate those who would mock him.

      God Speed and God Bless you, Lame Cherry. You will always have friends here, and a friend in me. Thank you for the incredible learning provided by you all these years! ^5 and SALUTE

      • 201 heather January 20, 2012 at 10:08 pm

        So Dr Kate you believe that LC is still here? I hope you are right–I just love her writings–little odd and weird at times, but always right on.

        I will miss her.

  51. 202 heather January 20, 2012 at 10:19 pm

    Here is a man that I have total respect for, a hollywood actor,who is clean, who is a Christian, and has never been a druggie or alcoholic.


Comments are currently closed.

January 2012

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Logistics Monster

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: