Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency

©2012 drkate

Abdul Karim Hassan is a naturalized citizen who wishes to run for the Presidency of the United States. This even though the Constitution says “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President.” Hassan v Scott Gessler,  Colorado SoS

Business Insider reported on September 5, 2012, Abdul Karim Hassan’s series of lawsuits claiming his right to run for the Presidency have been denied in the Second, Third, and now Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.  A similar ruling was issued September 28, 2012 for the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

The significance of these rulings cannot be underestimated as they affirm that the natural born citizen clause of Article II of the U.S. Constitution has not been trumped, abrogated, or implicitly repealed by the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment nor the citizenship clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  These arguments are the same ones used by Obama’s lawyers in fending off the legitimate challenges to Barack Obama’s candidacy and presidency; by the secretaries of state to refute ballot challenges, and by the media, pundits, Congress and the academics to cover up the usurpation of the presidency by Obama/Soetoro.  Of course, the corrupt SCOTUS hears nothing, sees nothing, and says nothing.

Obama and his supporters, the Congressional eligibility deniers, and the media have been soundly defeated and Obama is still ineligible to hold or run for the office he seeks.  What is more interesting is that the legal rulings lend support to the charges of misprision of felony that all members of Congress, and all the secretaries of state face in contributing to the overthrow of the White House.

This article briefly reviews the history of this case and its rulings.

The FEC Filing 

Presidential Candidate Abdul Hassan ruled ineligible as he is not a natural born citizen

Hassan, a Guyana-born naturalized American citizen, filed papers with the Federal Election Commission to run for the presidency.  Astoundingly, the FEC ruled in September 2011 that Hassan could file papers and raise money to run for president of the United States:

But the agency also told the prospective candidate, Abdul Hassan, that his campaign may not receive federal matching funds because he was not born in America. However, the agency’s decision stopped short of addressing the constitutional issue of whether someone born outside the United States can be president.

Importantly, the FEC made clear that it was outside it’s jurisdiction to decide the constitutional merits of Mr. Hassan’s candidacy, saying that vetting was up to the States:

“This does not mean that he can go and say ‘look the FEC has said that I am a candidate, give me money, I’m official,’” said Republican Commissioner Donald McGahn. “That is not what we do here; we don’t certify you as a candidate. That’s what the states do.” (emphasis added)

Democratic FEC Commissioners had ‘trepidation’ in issuing this unanimous opinion because of how it might be perceived.  They attempted to qualify and explain their rationale:

“By saying that it is okay — it does give the impression that we don’t see a problem,” said Democratic Commissioner Steven Walther. “I think that we really need to be cognizant of how this could be misconstrued.”

To address this problem, one of the final sections added to approved opinion states:

“Notwithstanding this conclusion, the Commission expresses no opinion on Mr. Hassan’s potential liability arising out of his proposed activities under any other Federal or State law, including any laws concerning fraudulent misrepresentation. Any such issues are outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.”

“For us this is really all about what we are empowered to decide and what we are not empowered to decide,” said Democratic Commissioner Ellen Weintraub. “Nobody is saying that it is fine and nobody is saying it’s okay for this guy to be going out and raising funds.’

Ballot Access Denied in Colorado, New Hampshire

Hassan then proceeded to set up a website and attempted to get on the ballot in New Hampshire and Colorado.  When denied access by both Secretaries of State of each state, he sued.  He has filed five lawsuits which argued that:

… the Constitution’s natural-born-citizen requirement is a vestige of our less noble past, before we decided that discrimination based on national origin is a grievous wrong. (He points in his briefs to Dred Scott v. Sandford.)The lawsuits say the Constitution’s admonition that “[n]o person  except a natural born Citizen . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Hassan’s lawsuits have already been denied in the First and Second U.S. court of appeals. And the Tenth Circuit rounded out the trio on Tuesday when it too shut down Hassan’s case.

Complaint Against the FEC’s Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act

Hassan initiated other lawsuits aimed at the natural born citizen requirement based on these assumptions, and filed against the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act  (26 U.S.C. §§ 9001-9013) which provides public funding to Presidential nominees of major or minor political parties after the FEC issued an advisory opinion that Hassan did not qualify for any matching funding because he was not a natural born citizen.  Hassan argues that the Presidential Campaign Fund Act is:

(1) unconstitutional and invalid, and (2) the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution1 is irreconcilable with, and has been“trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Now this is where it gets interesting.  The FEC as defendant submitted a motion to dismiss the case based on the same premises that have been used to try to defeat challenges to Obama’s eligibility.  That is,

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), or in the alternative, for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (emphasis added)

The FEC also argued that Defendant argued that this Court should deny Plaintiff’s Application because

the Complaint fails to present an Article III case or controversy, and alternatively, because it does not present a substantial constitutional question. (emphasis added)

The government moved to dismiss the case–using the same arguments it has used to dismiss other cases against Obama–(1) failure to present a claim upon which relief can be granted, (2) lack of jurisdiction, (3) failing to present an Article III case or controversy, and (4) failure to present a substantial constitutional question.

The one argument missing from the government’s defense?  STANDING.

American Jurisprudence and Constitutional Legal Thinking

The DC circuit court dismissed Abdul Hassan’s case. The judge’s ruling denying Abdul Hassans suit against the FEC is illustrative for the process the Judge followed in making its conclusions.  As opposed to ducking jurisdiction and ducking its Article III responsibility to hear cases involving constitutional questions, the court determined:

Because subject matter jurisdiction focuses on the court’s power to hear the claim, however, the court must give the plaintiff’s factual allegations closer scrutiny when resolving a Rule 12(b)(1) motion than would be required for a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 67-68 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Thus, to determine whether it has jurisdiction over a claim, the court may consider materials outside the pleadings where necessary to resolve disputed jurisdictional facts. Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C. Cir. 1992). (emphasis added)

Regarding FRCP Rule 12 (b), the court determined:

A court need not, however, “accept inferences drawn by plaintiffs if such inferences are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint. Nor must the court accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations.” Id. In addition,“[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” (emphasis added)

In other words, the Court actually took on the issue, was legally entitled to review additional information, and ruled it did not have to accept inferences or ‘legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations’.  Every one of the Obama challenge cases was thrown out first, on standing, and second, using the measly excuses such as failure to present a case, lack of Article III jurisdiction, or the ‘political question’.

Article II Still Stands

I hope everyone who has been involved in the eligibility movement can appreciate the significance of these rulings for the Constitution, the requirements of the Presidency, and all the work we have accomplished over the last several years.  It is critical to inform your friends who are skeptical of the ‘birthers’ or disappointed in the perceived failure of the 100+ cases challenging Obama that several courts have affirmed the natural born citizen requirement of the presidency–that it still stands, and that we are right and always have been on this issue.

Significantly the FEC believes the States are responsible for the determination of eligibility, just as the Article II Superpac, the Obama Ballot Challenge, the extensive legal work of many scholars, and manymany others have indicated.  The 2009 Continental Congress recommended vetting laws at the state level were required, and the Article II Superpac will continue its efforts after this election and into 2013 to ensure a vetting process is in place at multiple levels, to make sure the usurpation of the White House by an unknown, unvetted foreign national never happens again.

Please donate to the Article II Superpac to ensure its efforts continue through and beyond the 2012 election.  The national security of our Nation is at stake.

199 Responses to “Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency”

  1. 1 drkate October 6, 2012 at 11:18 pm

    Did Hassan do us a favor, or did we just have some good judges for a change? Why did these judges have courage and the others have not?

    • 2 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 10:52 am

      Long and short of it:
      NO 14th amendment (naturalized aka statutory) citizen is a natural born citizen.
      One approach that was never pursued, because it piques absurdity but is valid: Hawaii avoided and never certified Obama’s birth-DATE in CO; i.e. if one “argues” for the sake of illumination that perhaps he was born before 1787, then if so he would be eligible for president — but if he was born after 1787 he is ineligible.
      It was always that raw distinction between “Citizen” and “natural born citizen” that proved he was ineligible, just based on the grandfather clause of Article II and the contrast between Article I’s requirement for Congress/Senate vs. Article II’s requirement for POTUS. And in terms of his Senate eligibility he needed to be a “Citizen” for 9 years; the retort would be yes, of course he was a Citizen for over 9 years, he was a Citizen since his “birth” in Hawaii thus meeting Article I’s requirement — but does being a “Citizen” even since birth, meet Article II’s requirement? Since the 14th does not cover Article II, and the 14th describes several citizens-at-birth but does NOT describe a 2-US Citizen parents/born in USA natural born citizen at all, which is the ONLY permutation missing (from the 14th and current law), this is obviously the only possible definition of a natural born citizen, which Obama fails. It’s just math.

      This Hassan dude thought he could ride the Hollywood sharia-compliant ignoramus lefty-anti-American do-nothing-about-clear-usurper Obama sentiments into sticking his foot in the door for other foreigners like himself, maybe collecting some campaign cash, mostly from fellow musloids, or to open the door for others like him to replace Obama.
      Do you notice on ALL federal forms you are only given the option of “Citizen” or “resident alien” or some other contrast, when in actuality there should be two categories of Citizen: Statutory/Naturalized or Natural Born Citizen.

    • 3 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 10:58 am

      The judges were saying, “we let Obama in, but no more foreigners”…I wonder if they realized it was better not to open the floodgates to more Obama-like-foreigners and put some meaning back into Article II.

      Hassan is just a statutory naturalized citizen thus ineligible. Obama is a US Code 1401 naturalized-at-birth statutory citizen, thus ineligible.

    • 4 sk1951 October 9, 2012 at 8:58 pm

      Because the guy is not considered black by current PC. There are not enough Muslims in the country to matter to them.

    • 5 sk1951 October 9, 2012 at 9:02 pm

      I did go to his web site and will say that I did enjoy his legal ease. It did ring with a lot of truth that has a good chance of winning in the right…er…a court that is supportive of a constitutional change for vetting. But then no one is vetting anyway so what does it really matter. They said he could run…so why not go ahead and run then make all the noise he can for popular support…just like BO did. This thought is very scarey to me.

  2. 6 A.Men October 7, 2012 at 3:31 am

    barry hussein obama has not proved his natural born qualification to hold the office of President of the USA. His photoshopped birth certificate is a fraud.

    Romney/Ryan 2012.

    • 7 sky October 7, 2012 at 7:50 am

      Is Romney against the corrupt FED? I dont think the rest of our goverment is,even maybe the military,or SECRET SERVICE, what is going on since the FED was started in 1913 by the demorat woodrow wilson put in place,by the elitist banksters.

    • 9 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 11:01 am

      But A.Men, barry never “lied” that his ostensible father BHO, Sr., was never a US Citizen. This farce was predicated on misdirection about birthplace whilst ignoring the glaring admission against interest that he was ineligible simply due to parental non-citizen status…and later we also found that Hawaii really never certified either his birthplace or his birthDATE.
      Look at his short form, it has a false seal on it, and his long form doesn’t exist.

    • 11 SUSANM October 7, 2012 at 4:28 pm


      • 12 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 6:16 pm

        Congress/Senate are either complicit or cowed, but in all cases they all know he’s ineligible and should face consequences, which history will NEVER ignore. Even Chester Arthur had the decency to lie, that his father was a US Citizen, whereas Obama openly admitted his father was never a US Citizen, and without the criminally complicit media, judiciary and Congress/Senate he would have been put on trial for fraud and treason. Obama is the ONLY president to EVER state he had a non-US Citizen parent, other than those presidents born before ratification (because they only had to be generic “Citizens”). Congress can scramble with bogus letter head drivel, hide behind some failed cases, pretend they don’t know about Arpaio, but the entire globe knows they know all about obama, and put in a lot of energy to pretend like they don’t. Their gambit is “plausible deniability”…how do they later say, “oh gee, we didn’t know”…one way is the Congressional Research Service which fall-guy-ed for them to, they hope, cover their asses when, not if, but when, the obvious nature of their misprison of treason crime becomes too much to hide any longer.

        If even one of them stepped forward before the weight of criminal prosecutions upon them was too great, they rest would all duck and cover under the “ignorance clause”. There’s no more protection for them since DC, they can no longer say a 14th-er is a NBC. Too late!!

  3. 14 no-nonsense-nancy October 7, 2012 at 6:51 am

    The courts are not in the tank for Hassan like they are for Obama. And he can’t deny that he was born in another country, whereas Obama has insisted that he was born in Hawaii. Of course, we all know that is not even the issue here. Do these judges have a better grip on what the founding fathers meant by natural born citizen? I don’t think they probably do. Hassan obviously doesn’t have big money and big names behind him where the usurper does.

    Thanks Kate, this is a very good post.

  4. 15 Troy October 7, 2012 at 7:04 am

    Those judges had “courage” because they were not dealing with Obama….They were dealing with a nobody…..Had it instead been Obama rather than Hassan the judges would have wimped out just like all the others have.

  5. 17 dualer October 7, 2012 at 7:07 am

    Florida Supreme Court decisions also support the premiss that the states decide who is eligible.

    “Eligibility for office is a judicial determination upon any challenge properly made”. (Shevin v. Stone (1972)).

    Obama’s lawyers have claimed that eligibility for POTUS is a “political question”, i.e one determined by a “sovereign” (branch of government) in the fulfillment of its constitutional duties. Thus they say that the 20th Amendment, and the electoral college (US Code 3 s. 15) provide the process for determinining eligibility.

    However, the 20th Amendment only provides the succession process AFTER the determination of “failure to qualify”. US Code 3 S. 15 (the Congressional statute for the operation of the electoral college) provides no process fopr determining eligibility, only that the electors may “submit objections”, and does not specify what those objections may be.

    Further, it has been well held in SCOTUS that the electors are NOT members of the government, and are agents of the states (SEE Mcpherson v. Blacker (pg. 35), and Fitzgerald v. Green (pg. 178)).

    My case is on appeal making these very same points that the Hassan case supports—- eligibility is a state determination.

    By the way, A2S1C4 is a self operating. No statutory provision is necessary to enforce it. The obama lawyers’ contention that the “state SOSs have no duty to determine eligibility” is of no consequence.

    “[T]he modern doctrine favors the presumption that constitutional provisions are intended to be self-operating. This is so because in the absence of such presumption the legislature would have the power to nullify the will of the people expressed in their constitution, the most sacrosanct of all expressions of the people.” Gray v. Bryant, 125 So. 2d at 851

  6. 18 usapatriots-shout October 7, 2012 at 9:06 am

    This article has been the ray of hope I’ve been waiting for the last four years. The winds of change are beginning to shift in the right direction. That right direction is the restoration of our great REPUBLIC. Now this is the hope and change America needs.

    Barry was used as the plan A block buster on the issue of NBC. He was the test. If he gets away with it, then they move to plan b. This creep was financed to establish a track record that a foreign born person could again be president. That is why he brought the issue to so many courts. Had he succeeded, it would have been the last step in successfully shredding our Constitution. The last of America would have been lost.

    This court decision opens the gate to take the step necessary to proceed with every bit of intellectual ammunition to indict and prosecute not only Obama but all those who are complicit in the conspiracy after Barry is out of the WH. Who might they be? Let’s start with The Clintons, Pelosi, Reid, Judges Roberts, Kagen, Sotomayer, Gibbs, Axelrod, Jarrett, Geitner, Holder, Bernanke, Sustein, . . . It is such a long list of treasonous traitors. Each and every one of them must be prosecuted.

    • 19 sky October 8, 2012 at 9:17 am

      Congress should be guilty of following a corrupt FED.All These Years,[A Lot Were Gone Home When It Passed 1913,FRAUD.]Audit it and get rid of it. Come up with a better plan,that works,instead of stealing.

  7. 20 Jim Baker October 7, 2012 at 10:02 am

    Does anybody know who Abdul Karim Hassan is? Who is funding his lawsuits? Is it possible that Obama is backing Mr. Hassan effort to obtain a ruling that there is no distinction between a “naturalized citizen” and a “Natural born citizen”? Is Obama trying to establish that regardless if he is a Kenya citizen or if he is a Indonesia citizenship or if he is a U.S. citizen being born in Hawaii of a U.S. citizen mother and Kenya father, he, as a naturalized citizen, meets the requirements to be president? Of course he must then only have to prove that he became a naturalized citizen because he sure cannot prove that he is a “Natural born citizen”.

  8. 22 Melvin E. Holliday October 7, 2012 at 10:06 am

    ABOVE the LAW:? If lthis isn’t proof that Obama is above the law in the leyes of our entire court system thenl I don’t know what other proof anyone needs.

    • 23 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 11:08 am

      There was no judge in the land willing to take a bullet for the constitution, other than Judge Rule, but he didn’t get a chance for his ruling that government can’t seize private property.
      If a judge had ruled for Article II then had an “accident”…their ruling would have been deified.

  9. 24 Jan Rogers October 7, 2012 at 10:31 am

    Great article, thank you Dr. K.
    MT code needs to be changed. Our Sec. of St. only relies on what the RNC, DNC and any other group behind a candidate verifies. So, if DNC says that obat is eligible, then he is on the ballot.

    • 25 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 11:16 am

      Talk about passing the buck. Could the DNC be required to show its proof of determination of eligibility on the basis of them defrauding voters?

  10. 31 Bob's Box October 7, 2012 at 11:15 am

    Doc, not sure if you should send this to Birther Report, because the Obots’ pink lace thong undies would bind up their rear ends.

  11. 32 Joe, Da Barber..Florida October 7, 2012 at 1:09 pm

    The only problem with this story is that the Judge fails to define EXACTLY what is a NBC. Most Judges are convinced that a U.S. citizen and a NBC are one and the same…which we KNOW is NOT TRUE.
    ALL NBCs are U.S. citizens…but NOT ALL U.S. citizens are Natural Born Citizens.
    Such are the cases concerning Sen. Marco Rubio AND now we learn of former Sen. Rick Santorum. BOTH their parentS were NOT U.S. citizens when they were born here in the USA.
    I pray that BOTH parties DO NOT EVER try AGAIN to pull the wool over the United States and nominate a NON-Natural Born Citizen.

    • 34 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 6:31 pm

      The law on the books US Code 1401 is derived from the 14th amendment, and it lists a one-US-Citizen parent/child born on US soil permutation as a statutory or naturalized-at-birth citizen…therefore not a natural born citizen, since no US Code 1401 citizen is a natural born citizen. Even former, freed slaves, the first generation after 1868 which were counted as citizens based on the 14th, were not counted as natural born citizens, since their parents were country-less, non-US Citizens, as the 14th was not retroactive.

      And what of the CRA1866? It’s an active, non-overturned, Act of Congress …remember the 14th was added in 1868 and the laws relating to the 14th have been added since. CRA1866 was passed twice, again in 1870.

      It says: “That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power…are declared to be citizens of the United States.”

      So per this law the only persons who were obviously “natural born citizens” were those with parents who had US Citizenship.

      US law does not even recognize dual citizenship, the naturalization oath attests to this…all who are US Citizens must abjure all other citizenships. And so even if a parent had “dual” citizenship — as in slapped on by another country due to their own laws, as long as that person still has US Citizenship, which is not lost unless actively revoked by an adult competent person at a consulate…as long as that person has US Citizenship at all, that fundamentally is all US law sees as of any meaning.

    • 35 hammer and nail October 7, 2012 at 6:36 pm

      “A natural born citizen, is what a naturalized (statutory) citizen is not.”

      Look at the laws: the only omitted permutation of finite permutations is “born incountry of citizen parents”…it’s just math.

  12. 37 roseandpeony October 7, 2012 at 1:35 pm

    It is not just both or all political parties that have tried to pull the wool over our eyes and subvert the constitution, but it is Beck, Hannity, Levin and Limbaugh that have not only helped in the usurpation by Obama but also PROMOTED and pushed people like Rubio, Jindal and Santorum – ALL ineligible under Article II requirements. The really ugly bit with those “conservative” talking mouthpieces is that all of those windbags advertise the STUDY of the constitution through Hillsdale college!! What tripe. Hillsdale, ya better make sure the people you hire to advertise on your behalf aren’t liars themselves!! Can you hear me know???

    • 38 no-nonsense-nancy October 7, 2012 at 7:17 pm

      I will check, but I very much doubt that Hillsdale hires anyone to advertise their constitution study. They advance their institution themselves.

      • 39 roseandpeony October 8, 2012 at 9:45 am

        The Hillsdale constitutional studies are advertised on the radio every day and it those talking heads that are promoting it – daily. How they can do it with a straight face is a wonder.

        • 40 no-nonsense-nancy October 8, 2012 at 11:01 am

          Well, I wouldn’t be caught dead listening to those guys, never have, never will, so you are probably right. It still doesn’t mean that Hillsdale promotes them doing it. Hillsdale is a good school and I have benifited from their constitution classes and webinars.At least they are teaching conservative values. I’m sure that my three kids who I put through college didn’t get a course on the Constitution.

          • 41 roseandpeony October 8, 2012 at 2:44 pm

            Oh I agree, my husband and I have donated to Hillsdale before, but maybe we should think better of it since the talking heads they are using are happy that the constitution was violated and they want to violate it further with more ineligibles! But I wonder why they, Hillsdale, have been silent on the NBC issue and its meaning since they are urging study of the constitution. It leaves a bitter taste in my mouth that those complicit through SILENCE on the usurpation can with one hand promote the constitution and with the other hand be NOT actually able to utter the 3 words NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, which last time I looked was printed in the constitution in Article II section I clause V. Yeah, they of the conservative talk media, cannot even say the actual words that are in the constitution!!!! If it were not so sickening it would be laughable. What a screwed up nation we have become.

    • 42 Melvin E. Holliday October 8, 2012 at 9:38 am

      Ditto, I think I got a talking mouse in my pocket. I been saying the same thing for years.

  13. 43 protectourcivilrightsfreedoms October 7, 2012 at 5:56 pm

    First Presidential Debate: Obama vs. Romney (Complete HD – Quality Audio)

    “Barack Obama and Mitt Romney discuss domestic policy in the first debate of the 2012 presidential election from Denver, Colorado.”

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Romney Debates the Empty Chair

    Carol Platt Liebau
    Oct 05, 2012 07:35 PM EST

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Happy Friday: Watch Obam-“uh” Struggle Through the Debate in 51 Seconds

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    The Empty Chair

    By Michael Ramirez – October 06, 2012

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “Round 1 – Romney Knock Out – 2012 Debate”

    By Lisa Benson – October 07, 2012

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


    By Lisa Benson

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    You Can’t Keep Kicking This Can Down The Road

    By Robert Ariail – October 05, 2012

  14. 45 usapatriots-shout October 8, 2012 at 12:01 pm

    What Do the Words F*ck and Racist Have In Common?

    The two most over used words in America today are—racist and F*ck. There once was a time both of them had real power. Now they are so common they have lost their usefulness and it suggests those who use them have limited vocabularies and maybe even limited minds.
    I am rather disappointed over that. Once upon a time “f*ck” had bite, punch and shock power. I mean the mere sound of the f-word at a ladies high social would cause them to spill their tea on themselves. Security would be called and the offender was sternly orderded to cease and desist or face a severe alternative. No decent woman would be caught using that word even when she was doing it. Then movie producers found out it increased box office tickets. From then forward its use became so common in the movies, by stand-up comedians, house wives, mothers and teen agers it lost its power. I for one am sorry to see that word’s demise into the no big deal class. Try shouting f*ck at a tea party today and they are liable to shout back “f-u”. I can no longer use the f-word to convince people I’m a bad ass.

    Martin Luther King brought the use of the word “racist” into play in the 60’s. Yes, there plenty of RACISTS, then. That one word perfectly described people who hated others merely upon the fact of their color ethnic back ground. Mr King did more to demonstrate the stupidity and cruelty of racism that anyone today. King’s blood became the seed of the cause. From that time murder forward I joyfully witnessed the decrease of the practice of racism in America. I was happy to see American blacks excel in every type career from teaching, medicine, law, entertainment, movie production, golf, and all sports, politics to art and more. Gradually and steadily the differences between black and white were dissipating. We were working together as citizens of America.

    That is not to say there are no more white racists in America since then. It is also not to say there are no racists among blacks. There are plenty in all people. However the numbers of hard core bigots had significantly decreased to a minority until the queen of black racism stepped forward—Michelle Evita Obama. Bringing back the idea of racism and dividing America was a major part of Sotoero’s campaign strategy in 2008. Repeatedly attacking people with The word “RACIST” became the whip they repeatedly used when anyone objected to any of Obama’s policies. From the beginning of Barry’s campaign to the present, we heard the word “RACIST” more times than we did the in the combined total of the past 20 years. Like the word “f*ck” the word “racist” has been used to describe anything from sex, anger, frustration, stupidity or simply to discredit any valid point the attacker has no intellectual rebuttal. They literally used the white American’s fear of being LABELED RACIST into forcing America into voting for a pretend to be black man. IT WAS HISTORICAL THEY REPEATED. THIS IS OUR CHANCE TO HAVE OUR FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT. OUR CHANCE TO SHOW THE WORLD AMERICA IS NOT RACIST. Let us not forget—Obama is also half Caucasian.

    Racists come in all colours—especially black. Since the two criminals moved into the WH, we have seen the rise and support of black hatred against white people beyond our wildest imaginations. Who would have believed there was so much suppressed hatred in black people against white? Eric Holder not only supports the Black Panthers, he PROTECTS THEM. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Michelle Obama, NAACP, Rev. Wright, the idiot Snoop Dog, Samuel E. Jackson and thousands of other don’t even have the decency to be diplomatic about it. They’re standing on the street corners, on stage and in your face shouting their hatred and threats of murder to whites and white babies as they are whipping people with the word “RACIST”. How’s that for creating a unified America? What do they want— A black only America? We all can thank the number one racist couple of America for setting back for the next ten years all the progress made since Martin Luther King. By the way, have you seen any improvement for the poor and middle class black since Obama moved into the WH? Have you also noticed how far Muslims in America have advanced since Barry usurped the presidency?

    Here’s the problem. We heard “racist” used some much— like the f-word, it has lost its power. We heard the word used incorrectly in so many ways we’ve lost respect for the user. The price America has paid with over 23,000,000 unemployed, our annual incomes decreased as much as 12% per year, 30% increase in the cost of living, massive increase in food stamp users, decrease in our national security, a major loss to our most basic Freedoms guaranteed us under the Constitution is no longer worth avoiding being called RACIST.


    • 46 no-nonsense-nancy October 8, 2012 at 1:54 pm

      usapatriotshouts, you are so right! My best friend called me a racist and I haven’t spoken to her in 6 months. If she apoligizes to me I’ll talk to her but she is such a libtard there is no use even trying to make up with her until after the election.

      • 47 usapatriots-shout October 8, 2012 at 3:03 pm


        You have no idea how many friends and relatives I have stopped associating with because of Obama and the ignorant thinking that has come forward because of him. Their supidity is harmful and dangerous.

        That is why I keep on writing. I am trying to make sense out of the nonsense. I feel lost in the wilderness.

        • 48 hammer and nail October 8, 2012 at 3:37 pm

          I know, I try to keep away from the subject matter, with a lot of energy! Most O supporters believe he’s a safety net, their fear keeps them aligned with democrats, fear of being self-sufficient, and so that false expectation needs to be crushed for them. Obama wouldn’t take care of them any better than he does his impoverished brother George.

          • 49 no-nonsense-nancy October 8, 2012 at 8:58 pm

            In the spring I joined a local Ron Paul group. they are all mad for what Romney did to RP, as I am also. They are against the GOP and won’t vote for Romney.A couple are even voting for BO! they are total idiots. they have this email thng going where it is a string of continuous email messages. When I said I was voting for Romney they really let me have it. One suggested I listen to patriotic music, one said I must be young and nieve and the one I like best, one suggested I have a lobotomy so I won’t feel so bad for romney!

            • 50 hammer and nail October 9, 2012 at 12:30 am

              The human psyche is such that once an emotional bond is formed to a candidate, that facts are reinterpreted to fit the necessary belief system…facts do not change the belief system, facts will be ignored, or or the inescapable facts will simply not be factored into action.
              This is why so many blacks both acknowledge that Obama has done them great harm yet they still will vote skin color, as the emotional connection is just too powerful.

              • 51 RacerJim October 18, 2012 at 9:27 am

                “…facts do not change the belief system, facts will be ignored, ” explains why my Obot nephew is voting for Obama despite acknowledging Obama’s ineligibility.

      • 52 hammer and nail October 8, 2012 at 4:11 pm

        Nancy, tell your friend she and all democrats should apologize for their past and current (look at Detroit, which Allen West calls the “modern day slave plantation) support of slavery…and KKK, and Jim Crow, and their being against citizenship for former slaves (democrats considered them cattle).
        Predictably she’ll regurgitate the lie about dixiecrats, which is a total mythological creation that every single person in the GOP from then until now suddenly switched party-places with the dems (what utter bull!). Google “the dixiecrat myth” … let’s see what else do they say to try to disown their evil past…they try to say that GOP “back then” was “liberal” again, trying to take credit for GOP and disown their own evil history. Don’t let their lies stand.
        Democrats should feel SHAME for their support of slavery, and frank misogyny to this day!
        LBJ said, “I’ll have those n*****s voting democrat for the next 100 years!”

  15. 54 foxyladi14 October 8, 2012 at 1:31 pm

    good post Kate thanks :).

  16. 55 hammer and nail October 8, 2012 at 3:39 pm

    So Obama deliberately REDUCED the security of the Benghazi consulate while they simultaneously and repeatedly begged for MORE security!
    No wonder he was bewildered at the debates, he wants OUT, and he best scamper off to Saudi Arabia because his oceanfront Kaialua estate is not going to suffice for the wrath of Americans when they catch on to the fact that he SET UP Benghazi for his re-election theatre, no matter who died in the process.

    • 56 hammer and nail October 8, 2012 at 4:04 pm

      I think Benghazi is what robbed O of his confidence, and I think more people will go to jail over this issue — it doesn’t seem the GOP is going to be as “fail” about discovery of the deliberate nature of Benghazi, as they were about O’s failure of Article II.
      I think Americans won’t have as difficult of a time wrapping their arms around the fact that it was all deliberate, this time, because they’ve lost trust already. Betrayal doesn’t seem so far-fetched to more and more Americans now.
      Ambassador Stevens realized at some point between Obama’s rejection of more security and removal of existing security…and being smoked out from a room in which he was hiding, before the terrorists broke the door down to torture and kill him — at some point in that context, Stevens realized that Obama had set him up, had betrayed him. It’s all so evil.

  17. 60 Tiger 7 October 8, 2012 at 8:56 pm

    Again, all of the frenetic monkey motions that the WH and SoS have made emphize the credence of a botched kidnape-rescue scheme that cost four lives for which they don’t give a rats about. Also, they gave the Amb. to the UN a bunch of lies and hung her out to dry—she should be more than somewhat pissed.
    What a bunch of sorry excuses for Americans—I’m ashamed of them and not at all sure they all are Americans.

  18. 61 Quantum Leap October 8, 2012 at 9:02 pm

    Kick the bum out.

    “This one REALLY is not from or about a dem or a rep — Read the author of the new quote on this site….

    Little by little, the subtle changes come until one day we will wake up and be in the United Socialist States of America. The election is just around the corner, so get and stay engaged as if our nation depended on it… because it does!!!!!

    U.S. Department of Justice ditches red, white, and blue stars and stripes.
    Well, how interesting!

    It seems the U.S. Department of Justice

    has changed its web site.

    Gone are the colorful red, white, and blue U.S. Flag decorations on the page,

    Replaced by stark black. Why BLACK?

    And at the top of the page, is a rather interesting quote:

    “The common law is the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people.”

    Catchy, huh? Just one tiny little (too small to be relevant obviously) point–

    The quote is from C. Wilfred Jenks, who in the 1930’s was a leading proponent of the “international law” movement, which had as its goal to impose a global common law and which backed ‘global workers’ rights.’

    Call it Marxism, call it Progressivism, call it Socialism

    Under any of those names, it definitely makes the DOJ look corrupt in their new website with Marxist accessories to match.

    See for yourself:

    How very interesting that ‘they’ couldn’t find a nice quote from one of our Founders.

    People, we ARE LOOSING our Republic!

    This is an example of the slow, methodical misuse of power our current government is doing as they lead us to socialism, and destroying our republic as we have known it.

    Get ready for November

    Bring back the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA——

    Please—–pass this on to 10 to 20+people on your e-mail list ASAP!

    Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak.
    Courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.
    Winston Churchill “

  19. 63 drkate October 8, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    OT very powerful–spread it

  20. 67 Jan Rogers October 8, 2012 at 11:17 pm

    OT – On a previous post I posted a statement about Romney backing Monsanto.
    Here is more and I’m still searching.

  21. 76 no-nonsense-nancy October 9, 2012 at 7:38 pm

    I have a comment that won’t post.

  22. 77 no-nonsense-nancy October 9, 2012 at 7:40 pm

    I’ll try again.

    Breaking news! Hearing tomorrow on Benghazi scandle. Is BO done for?

  23. 78 no-nonsense-nancy October 9, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    Hearing tomorrow.

    Breaking news! Hearing tomorrow on Benghazi scandle. Is BO done for?

  24. 82 drkate October 9, 2012 at 7:48 pm

    OT: Obama’s ‘wedding ring’–“There is no other god but Allah”

    • 83 drkate October 9, 2012 at 9:41 pm

      And, another unfolding scandal ‘donorgate’ obama being funded by foreign donations,again, only in 2012 it is China. What we got in 2008 until now is obama paying back his illegal donations from the middle east…and why we have the muslim brotherhood in charge. no god but allah indeed

    • 84 heather October 10, 2012 at 11:00 am

      imagine that–and he’s a Christian! lmao–the world is laughing at our country and the people for electing someone so dangerous and evil and continues to sit in our WH. For the longest time I have wondered what threats are being made against our congress and senators that are so bad they continue to let him RULE—well, because they are all multimillonaires, and have made their money screwing us, the cats will leap from the bags–proof that they have decieved us for all these years and the pay offs they have taken is enough to threaten them with.

      they no longer have to campaign, they just buy their votes, they no longer have to represent us, they just take payoffs and bribes from the rich and the corporations, they no longer have integrity of any kind—why would they, they have made themselves indespensable lying to all of us. their clout and power overwhelms each of us and we idiots still vote for them! we definitely need a 3rd party—a very conservative one and then watch how they beg for our votes.


    • 85 heather October 10, 2012 at 2:26 pm

      IMHO the more we “talk” about him and his thuggery ways, the more he loves it. Don’t ya think he enjoys being the center of attention!

    • 87 heather October 10, 2012 at 10:49 am

      this abuse can only continue to go on unless we the people stop flying, stop buying things, stop everything that we do to make the economy screech to a halt and they all start feeling the pinch of NO MONEY!

      yeah I know people have to travel, they have to shop, and they have to live their daily lives, but somewhere we must end this abuse that is directed at us. in order to do this we need to stop feeding them.

    • 88 Jan Rogers October 12, 2012 at 9:12 pm

      Tonight I heard on the radio that TSA wants to start using bracelets on passengers, if you mis-behave, they will zap you with elec. current.

    • 91 drkate October 10, 2012 at 10:37 am

      OT–Join us tonight for a special edition of Walls in our Minds on revolution radio: “Has the Global Bully Been Exposed”?

      Has the global bully been exposed? America finds itself as the focus of world scorn and condemnation as a global bully, along side its ‘greatest ally in the middle east’, Israel. While the cause of this reputation clearly rests with our so-called ‘elected leaders’ and policy makers, it is WE THE PEOPLE who have allowed this country to follow a false theologies that fail to put God at the top of the pecking order. The Constitution was written for a Godly, moral people and certainly we have strayed from this path greatly. Until we return to the spiritual understanding upon which this country was founded, there is no return to a Constitutional Republic. Join Red Beckman, Terry Dodd, and drkate for a discussion of the necessary tools to bring about an orderly restoration of our Constitutional Republic.

      6 pm pacific/9 pm eastern

      • 92 heather October 10, 2012 at 10:42 am

        agree 100%

      • 93 Troy October 10, 2012 at 11:16 am

        I believe the Republic is well beyond restoration…..It’s been gone for a long time, we just didn’t realize it….A new 2nd republic will have to be built from ground on up and that cannot begin until ALL of the vermin from local, state and federal levels are imprisoned…..It’s only at that time that we can have a new government…..This current poor excuse for one must be thrown off. – jmo

        • 94 heather October 10, 2012 at 2:24 pm

          I agree Troy–we the people will have no other choice if we want our republic back the way it was written and meant to be. It is now our turn to take back what we have left.

        • 95 drkate October 10, 2012 at 4:52 pm

          me too. and we won’t even get to rebuild one until we accept responsibility for the destruction of our first republic. And the foundation it must be rebuilt on is what our Founders used.

          • 96 heather October 10, 2012 at 5:54 pm

            DR.Kate, I would like to post a video that I just recieved that tore my guts to shreds. Do I have your permission to post what our military does to live animals?

            And God should bless America? I have just lost all faith in our military after watching 1 minute of it.

            • 97 drkate October 10, 2012 at 6:28 pm

              Heather, just mentioning it is enough to make my stomach turn. War is disaster and a crime against all humanity and all the kingdom of God. Please do not post this film. Thank you.

          • 99 Linda Joy Adams October 10, 2012 at 8:03 pm

            Audit the fed. the data trail will show which high level officials or the fed them selves have diverted our tax dollars that were authorirzed for legal puropses to people or entities to somewhere else. Then arrests and prosecutions can be made of just who the entrenched criminals are. WHy would any one in Congress not want this? Not everyone is corrupt. but those that are need to be borught to justice and my own fiels and records show many suspects. Maybe the new whistle blower law ewill help as we need those inside with knowledge to felel free to come forward in an era where eye witnesses are not very well accepted. Linda Joy Adams eyewitness to events of bitrh of President Obama in Topeka Ks.

      • 100 hammer and nail October 10, 2012 at 6:48 pm

        …should also have one on “constitutional ignorance” too! (NOT YOU of course)

    • 101 heather October 10, 2012 at 10:40 am

      to quote bill ayers, “guilty as hell, free as a bird”…………..will barry and hillary get away with this prior to the elections?

    • 103 drkate October 10, 2012 at 10:40 am

      Very good video!

      • 104 heather October 10, 2012 at 12:49 pm

        OT-Being that we are approaching the end of tornado season here, we are now scheduled for massive powerful storms Thursday, Friday and Saturday—and the sky has been crystal blue all day except for the massive criss cross chemtrails that have been being sprayed since early this morning. Just an update to keep a watch on the skys now.

    • 106 no-nonsense-nancy October 10, 2012 at 1:00 pm

      Most of my comment did not get posted.

      I bought the book by Bob Bard on Obama’s ineligibility. I am not very far into it yet but it is very good. Everyone should read it and spread the word around abut it. Above is the lilnk for an interview of him on the terry Lakin radio show of this week.

      I also am reading The Making of America-the substance And Meaning Of the Constitution byW. Cleon Skousen, the author of the 5000 Year Leap. It is very good also.

  25. 107 heather October 10, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    more cheating

    • 109 heather October 10, 2012 at 9:28 pm

      let’s all hope that Ryan blows biden away the same as romney did to barry tomorrow night!

      • 110 sky October 11, 2012 at 8:55 am

        Why isnt Obama,Biden,Romney,and Ryan and congress,not saying anything about the corrupt FED? They are corrupt if they dont.

        • 111 Tenacity October 11, 2012 at 9:39 am

          Absolutely! Kinda sums up who they are working for doesn’t it. Surprise!…it ain’t us.

        • 113 Linda Joy Adams October 12, 2012 at 6:12 pm

          The federal reserve has the data trail to know who has been diverting tax dollars and blatantly stealing for some time. % 4 million in my case; $ million form partner of medicare creating 17 phony medicare numbers and claims and only one day went to doctor and eh rest debited fro the Medicare trust fund and went? Only the feds know. Then there is a million dollars a head on every seriously injured federal employee for set aside monies for medial care and the Office of Inspector general has eveidence of an embezzlement ring but no allowed to investigate for almost A decade by hi govt officials. if those inside the fed are dong this then the audit will expose it, or the corrupt high level officials who can divert what is authorized by rank and file workers for legitimate purposes. all monies, whether sent to an individual or entity, form one social security check to payment for a govt defense contract is only an authorization sent to the fed reserve and they OK the monies be sent( money as to be n the bank first) if diverted to another account, only they may know. A\even monies tat got for one agency to another, like the money for OWCP goes form one agency to another through the fed each time. some estimates are trillions missing over the last couple of decades we are not broke, we have been robbed and some high level people need to go to jail and the money found and returned. People have died fighting for medial care and livelihoods over this and criminal charges needed to be brought. congress over the last couple of decades has systematically passed laws allowing for high level officials to operate with little oversight and non for govt contractors who go through the same process. Linda Joy Adams with over 5 million missing in my name and.or for me alone. A coup d’etat that started in 1983 in Dallas with step by step plan of takeover. Note, when Eric Holder started to go after some of these entities, he got in trouble over fast and furious? and the whole world went along because they believe whatever the main media says. Whether a fake bio of the president or trillions missing out of our public money.we all help create that money, even if not paying direct taxes. Linda Joy Adams

      • 114 sky October 11, 2012 at 8:57 am

        Is the govenor in ok.going overseas to look for jobs,why not in america?reddirtreporter. lot of good articals

        • 115 heather October 11, 2012 at 11:27 am

          Gov Fallon said she is not paying for the trip that the corporations were picking up the tab, and she was going to the companies that do business in OK and see if they will expand and continue to do biz in OK— that is what she said on her news conference–how true it is or how truthful she is being only time will tell.

          • 116 sky October 12, 2012 at 7:24 am

            Just like the gov.chesapeake ceo,and the chinese came to lake texoma to try and sell it to the chinese,and they said no.The CEO doing business with the Chinese in south texas.and the CEO’s buddy Boone Pekins sold 500 million shares to give to a foreign corporation.

    • 117 usapatriots-shout October 11, 2012 at 10:19 am

      I saw that and posted a comment to something like this:

      Is that so? Then why did he play over 105 games of golf and take a two billion dollar/10 day vacation to India while ignoring America’s vital issue and destroy our national security?

  26. 119 Kathy October 11, 2012 at 1:20 am

    If this shows up twice, sorry, but I think I lost the first post.

    Have you guy’s seen this? Why isn’t the main stream media all over this? Is the timing a coincidence?

  27. 122 no-nonsense-nancy October 11, 2012 at 4:27 am

    Is this what the police would do if they came into my house and saw all of my books on the constitution? We are going to see a lot more of ths kind of police behavior, I’m afraid.

    Political Profiling of a “constitutionalist” turns simple domestic call into SWAT raid

    Dees Illustration
    J.G. Vibes

    Activist Post

    A farming family in Letha, Idaho recently had their house raided and were assaulted by police after a neighbor called the police when overhearing a verbal argument between the husband and wife who owned the house. In any other situation they would have had a simple knock on their door and the police would check in to make sure that no one was being hurt.

    However, Marcella Cruz and Michael Gibbons were flagged in the police department’s database as dangerous individuals because one or both of them identified as “constitutionalists”. Due to this identification their simple domestic disturbance call was met with a full on swat raid, with the officers scouring the house for evidence of Marijuana.

    The officers ripped Marcella Cruz out of the house, and had both her and Michael on the ground in handcuffs, with guns against their heads. The police found an aquaponics system that was growing tomatoes in an upstairs room of the house and celebrated, thinking that they had found a Marijuana grow operation. Much to their disappointment they were informed that it was obviously tomatoes, since after all, this was a farm house.

    In a recording that surfaced after the raid it is explicitly stated that this couple is being targeted because of their political beliefs. The recording shows the following exchange:

    “Are you familiar with these guys?” asked a deputy identified in the 911 recordings as “Officer 57.”

    “Negative,” answered another deputy designated “Officer 56.”

    “I am, and it’s affirmative, there is [sic] weapons,” continued Officer 57. “He is – or at least was – anti-law enforcement. We’ve had issues with him. He’s a Constitutionalist.”

  28. 123 Tenacity October 11, 2012 at 9:42 am

    I’ve got my popcorn ready and just might have a Red Ale in honor of uncle Joe. They should carry tonight’s debate on the Comedy Channel.

    • 124 Tenacity October 11, 2012 at 9:46 am

      If I’m laughing tonight, it will be to keep from crying. Actually, it will be masking my thorough disgust for the farce that this whole election is. Time to water the tree of liberty.

  29. 128 Jan Rogers October 11, 2012 at 4:08 pm

    Wow, Dr. K, Terry and Red, just finished the archived program from last night, FANTASTIC job.
    Thank you

  30. 129 heather October 11, 2012 at 8:10 pm

    biden–what a joke…nasty old winner from him.

  31. 138 heather October 11, 2012 at 8:50 pm

    here’s his video

  32. 139 heather October 11, 2012 at 8:56 pm

    I find this very interesting since they are naming george kaiser of OK–as part of this and 2 yrs ago biden was invited to kaisers home for a fund raiser—for barrys campaign.

  33. 140 Dabigragu October 11, 2012 at 10:27 pm

    An ad using the VP ‘Debate’

    • 141 heather October 12, 2012 at 7:11 am

      Excellent usage of that pathetic debate!

      • 142 usapatriots-shout October 12, 2012 at 7:38 am

        Biden ‘s laughter was a matter of folowing orders. Remember who prepped Biden for this debate. Axeldouche–the 100% follower of the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky. Among his rules that Barry’s cabal have used most often is RIDICULE.

        Biden was a disgrace to himself, to the Dems and America last night. He was out of control, angry, hostile, and out classed. His continuous Chesser cat grin and laughter was so out of place it suggested insanity while on the verge of a nervous breakdown. His actions were of a man who was told–“You better win this debate, or else.”

        Biden’s perfomance last night may well be a fore funner of what we can expect from B. Hussein next Tuesday. Barry and his cabal are beaten–defeated. They more so than anyone know they CANNOT WIN THIS ELECTION UNLESS THEY RESORT TO EVERY BIT OF ELECTION FRAUD THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH. Biden’s actions in that debate were that of a very frightened man. He was fighting for his political life!

  34. 143 Jan Rogers October 11, 2012 at 11:21 pm

    OT but if you take pics with your phone and then post them, watch this news article

  35. 146 Tiger 7 October 12, 2012 at 7:38 am

    The debates seem to typify the administration’s position—bho cannot discuss his real aimes for the country and biden just laughs all the issues off .
    We have a pretty clear picture, kids.

      • 148 Tenacity October 12, 2012 at 8:54 am

        Can Biden open his mouth without lying? The guy fakes his way through life by twisting almost everything…habitual…maybe pathological.

        • 149 hammer and nail October 12, 2012 at 9:05 am

          Lying without a blink is a pre-admission requirement to the upper echelons of politics, lying audaciously gets one ahead of the game, lying while totally effing millions of people over is high level (you have to pass the bill to know what’s in the bill), lying while getting people killed and still smiling and risking millions more is top tier (we didn’t know Benghazi embassy wanted more security).

          C’mon, it’s a GAME to these people, push the envelope of “how stupid are Americans?” and “what are they gonna do about it if we lie anyway”” and “we have the media covering out butts anyhow”…

          so the Achilles Heel is to go after the media.

  36. 150 Voco Indubium October 12, 2012 at 10:09 am

    Mike Huckabee interviewed Dick Morris this morning. Aside from the opinion on last night’s debate (that Ryan should have been more aggressive, calling the Benghasi affair a cover up and outright lie by the administration), Dick brought up a very interesting point. How O will tax the US, even if he loses the election, thought the UN.

    If someone has a link it would be a good thing to spread.

    (This is not an endorsement of Mike or Dick, so please hold your comments in that regard.)

  37. 155 heather October 12, 2012 at 6:07 pm

    This should alert every American to what barry is and has done and how he feels about capitalism. This also shows the lack of votes he will be getting this time.

    He’s the kind of man that every employee would love to have.

    • 157 heather October 12, 2012 at 7:27 pm

      RP is right, there is very little difference in any of them. Then again RP has said this for years.

      I’m disappointed that he didn’t get the nomination but we have to get barry out in Nov. We can only pray for God to set this record straight and bless America so we can prosper once again.

      Rush played a speech on his show today from JFK back in 1962 explaining how the govt does their budgeting, tax cuts and tax increases and what a speech it was. No wonder he was murdered–he told it like it was.

      • 158 heather October 12, 2012 at 7:35 pm

        Here’s the JFK speech

      • 159 sky October 13, 2012 at 7:32 am

        I had A Dream,Arrest OBAMA now,Get Riid of the FED.Now,everything nullified that obama did,treason,and Woodrow Wilson Treason,if this doesnt happen goverment is corrupt and everyone defending it,also is corrupt of treason going on since 1913,Its time to clean up this treason.What is the punishment of treason,this should be asked to everyone in congressman,Romney,Obama,and the military now.Signs go up now.

  38. 163 Jan Rogers October 12, 2012 at 8:55 pm

    All of our courts are 100% corrupted
    Once Sharia Law is allowed in our courts, the next step will be UN Laws

  39. 164 Jan Rogers October 12, 2012 at 8:57 pm

    All of our courts are 100-percent corrupted
    Once Sharia Law is allowed in our courts, the next step will be UN Laws

  40. 165 Jan Rogers October 12, 2012 at 10:27 pm

    OT, It is time to call all our Congress critters while they are home and tell them they are FIRED!!! Obat has made it clear for the past year that they are not needed in DC, so we should not have to pay their wages.

  41. 166 cfkerchner October 13, 2012 at 12:34 pm

    Can it all be Coincidence? Shocking Secrets & Verifiable Facts abt Barack Obama MSM Refuses to Report:

  42. 168 Jan Rogers October 13, 2012 at 1:29 pm

    Lies, lies, and more lies. Thank God for those that bring out the truth.

  43. 169 Jan Rogers October 13, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    Greta had the audacity to ask people to comment on what kind of a President Ron Paul would have been. Ignore the video, but do read the comments.

  44. 171 heather October 13, 2012 at 5:57 pm

    thanks to barry and hillary the entire middle east will be ruled by the muslim brotherhood–too bad for the people, they have no idea what they’re in for.

    I feel like we are living back in the crusades!

    • 172 heather October 13, 2012 at 5:58 pm

      btw–who authorized this so called muslim brotherhood to be complete dictators and where did this group come from.

    • 173 Jan Rogers October 13, 2012 at 6:12 pm

      That was the plan from the beginning. Hillary and Barak tried to force Honduras, they refused, so the happy couple went to the next country on the list. From the beginning of the riots in the first country, Glen Beck was yelling that the Muslim Bro would take over. Probably one of the reasons he got fired by FOX. I think the banksters are behind all this.

      • 174 heather October 13, 2012 at 7:34 pm

        I definitely remember Beck yelling about this and yes he probably was fired over it since that saudi prince bought into fox. It was right after he bought in the Beck’s show changed and he finished out his contract.

        • 175 Linda Joy Adams October 26, 2012 at 8:14 pm

          yes, I remember and its they who own the mian media and they are scared to death that the sec gen of Un will not be their puppet: thus the mian media has created a persona of the perfect candndidatee to be selected as it stime for someone from N America to have the post. amuslim with a dad for Kenya, the fake persona, is acceptable to the muslim bloc of naitons over a man born in Topeka ks with adad whose family has deep roots in the civil rights movememnt and a CHRISTIAN. The man media has known wehre Pres obmam was born, Topeka Ks and hidh it as their ‘ masters’ need to control the uN? They picked someone that has not known the truth of his orgins, thanks to his maternal grandmother that oconvinced everyone to use the fake bio as of fall of 1963. Linda Joy Adams, eye witness to birth circumstances in Topeka Ks and its getting the Truth out is the only way to do this. Unfortuanlty Glenn Beck and others who keep spreading the false bio of the president are ony aiding the banksters adn playing rightinto their hands. Pres Romney is going to not be in charge next year, Sec Gen obama is as past congresses and presidents have gradually turned all our soverignty over to them. Most have forgotten that the uN sec general is passed around by areas of the world and we have not had one yet. Bill Clinton was thought to be a viable candidiate, but he is obviously a Christian no matter how much Hillary ‘gets along’ with the Muslim nations. many have misunderstood my motives in this; its getting the TRUTH out! kRIS kOBACH HAS HAD HIS POITICAL OPEIONS FOR SOME TIME, WHY THE OPPOSITION NOW? hE HAS THE RECORDS AS SEC OF StATE OF ks AND i ASKED oRLY tAITZ TO ASK FOR COURT ORDER AND ID NOT DO SO. HE CAN;T SAY ANYTHING WITHOUT IT OR THE pRESIDENT RELEASE THEM.

          • 176 steve K (@sk1951) October 30, 2012 at 7:17 pm

            Editor’s note: This is another in a series of “WND/WENZEL POLLS” conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.

            Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.
            Ads by Google

            The results came in a groundbreaking scientific poll for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies. It was taken Oct. 22-26 and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 3.98 percentage points.

            The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

            And the big winner among Muslim-Americans in the presidential election is Barack Obama, the poll found. More than 72 percent said they are definitely supporting Obama, and another 8.5 percent are leaning that direction. Only 11 percent are for Romney.

            Nearly 55 percent of the American Muslim voters say the U.S. is on the right track, and another 13 percent are uncertain. Virtually all of the respondents (98 percent) are American citizens and 97 percent are registered to vote.

            • 177 lindajoyadams October 31, 2012 at 1:08 am

              Not so many years ago there used to be a common saying in the USA. You’ can’t legislate morality. Although we have freedom to practice ones religion in this country, its not entirely free as the secular laws can;t be broken. We used to be taught the following a an example. Ones church or faith may not recognize a divorce,, but the govt does if one gets a civil divorce in court. We have unleashed something here and it has to be stopped. All kinds of groups think they can just secede from the rule of law of the nation and states. one can get kicked out of a faith for breaking their rules, but the civil society accepts you.
              If one ants to live in the USA and be a citizen, etc. then one follows the laws of the land. In a free society, there are not going to be many rules restricting personal behavior. One may think someone;s behavior is leading straight to damnation from their faith perspective, a;Freedom of speech gives us the right to say something, but the person can say leave me alone, too. Its called free will and freedom. We don’t have to agree with everyone’s life styles, etc. but to but each needs to know if they want to live a certain way, they can do so as long as the laws of the country are not violated.
              as for the persona of being a Muslim, its part of the election for the Sec Gen of UN. There is much bigger campaign going on here. Main media knows the truth and they just decided to hide it. Some have been interviewed on TV since I began posting and admitted it. Those that own the main media are scared to death they are not going to have someone they can control in as Sec gen of UN since congresses over the last couple of decades have gradually turned over our sovereignty to the UN, step by step. Linda Joy Adams.

  45. 183 Quantum Leap October 13, 2012 at 6:22 pm

    See this

  46. 185 Jan Rogers October 13, 2012 at 6:40 pm

    OT, do any of you have the book “The Naked Communist” by Skousen?
    Does anyone have the ORIGINAL source of Skousen’s list of the 45 Declared Goals of the CPUSA? I know it was entered into the Congressional Record in 1963, but if anyone has it from the horse’s mouth, that would be even more compelling.

  47. 187 heather October 13, 2012 at 7:50 pm

    I’m about sick of this rotten bast$$d and his dirty rotten illegal tricks against all of us.

    • 188 Jan Rogers October 13, 2012 at 9:18 pm

      It appears from reading the full EO that these sanctions apply to Iran not all bank accounts, unless you are funneling money and goods back to Iran. Hum, wonder what the major banks will do?

  48. 193 tina October 21, 2012 at 1:40 pm

    thankyou Dr. Kate.

  49. 194 Jenny January 28, 2013 at 7:21 am

    He is NOT an American

  1. 1 Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency Trackback on October 7, 2012 at 9:03 am
  2. 2 Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency Trackback on October 8, 2012 at 8:28 am
  3. 3 Third Court Rules Guyana-Born Muslim Lawyer Can’t Run For US President « Creeping Sharia Trackback on October 8, 2012 at 9:36 am
  4. 4 ~~Defender of Faith~~Guardian of Truth~~ Trackback on October 8, 2012 at 11:15 am
  5. 5 Is the Obama Campaign Being Financed by Foreign Donations? | IowaDawg Speaks to Everyone Trackback on October 8, 2012 at 5:02 pm
Comments are currently closed.

October 2012
« Sep   Nov »

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90

%d bloggers like this: