Archive for the 'Threshold Constitutional Issues Series' Category

Confirmed: The Parties vs. America

©2016 drkate

Any questions?

parties v america

Well, if you still have questions about what has been exposed during this election cycle, consider this:

communists and clinton

The left wants America destroyed. Republicans want America destroyed. Democrats want America destroyed, all in the name of globalism. The parties choose the candidates and “vet” them too–that is how we got Obama, and why three constitutionally ineligible republican candidates were allowed to run–Rubio, Jindal, and Cruz.

And look at how the “parties” hide in plain site everwhere:


Our first President recognized the dangers of the parties:

“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

And finally, Americans have awaken and are in full revolt against the corruption of these middlemen.  And the middlemen and financiers hate Trump because he has exposed it all… their influence, money-minded decision making against Americans, and their betrayal of the principles which made America that “shining city on the hill”.  The gravy train built on theft from Americans is over.

He may not be perfect, but Trump is the only choice for America!  Trump knows about the false song of globalism,which is destroying us:

Open thread!

The Sixteenth Amendment and the Federal Reserve

©2012 drkate

It is no coincidence that the two major actions which have undermined the Constitution and taken control away from the people occurred during the same year, and that they are intricately related.  The Federal Reserve Act established a central banking system in the United States–not controlled by the federal government–but designed to control the federal government. The Act was passed by Congress on December 23, 1913 and  illegally granted authority to a banking cartel to issue Federal Reserve notes as legal tender.

This allowed the U.S. government to borrow these notes–money–to grow beyond the boundaries of the Constitution, and pay them back to the central banking cartel with interest.  Where would the money come from to pay back the banking cartel?

“Income taxes”, aka, the non-ratified Sixteenth Amendment.

Notice the burst of ‘federal spending’ outside the Constitutional limits–for example, creating agencies, expanding the military operations overseas, creating laws outside of the eighteen enumerated powers that expanded the government after 1913.  The government borrowed money from the FED, and earmarked Americans’ personal income to pay it back. Declaring bankruptcy in 1932, the ‘social security scheme tax’ was implemented–and promised to Americans as a safety net in their retired years. We’ve all paid into it but the politicians stole it…my mother until her last day paid taxes on that social security ‘income’ that was in fact derived from taxes on her income all the years she worked.

The book, “The Law that Never Was”, researched and written by Red Beckman and Bill Benson, provides the historic documentation that the Sixteenth Amendment was not legally ratified. This book is being offered free to the 50,000 commenter on drkatesview.

In a series of “letters to the IRS” taken from the book “Do Unto the IRS As They Would Do Unto You!”, the author advises a misdirected IRS agent attempting to collect illegal income taxes to do the research himself to verify the non-existence of the Sixteenth Amendment:

  • Read the Congressional Record to check the intent of Congress in 1909.  Who was to be taxed–the rich, the middle class, or th epoor?
  • Find the resolution passed by the Congress.  Try to find a bill passed by the Congress.
  • Get Senate Document 240 (Library of Congress 1931–Serial set 9346)
  • Look at the legislative journals for the 48 states.  Why did the 48 states suspend their rules in their consideration of the Sixteenth Amendment?
  • Did the state legislatures pass resolutions or did they pass bills?
  • Check to see if these resolutions are binding
  • Find out why the proclamation by the Secretary of State is labeled PRIVATE LAW
  • Where is the President’s signature?
  • Can a law be passed without the President’s signature?

The Freedom Law School is offering a $300,000 reward to anyone who can prove the Sixteenth Amendment was legally ratified.  If you are instead more concerned about how to deal with any current “IRS Problems” this site provides some excellent resources and guidance.

As advised by Joe Bannister on Revolution Radio’s “Walls in our Minds” recent broadcast, it is important to understand the realities of challenging this illegality thrust upon America in the last 99 years.  The awakening of the people to this fraud is why the ‘NWO’ and alien financiers are so hell-bent on controlling the world through destabilization and defeating America as we speak, as these words are written.  Notice the only candidate to mention the Sixteenth Amendment and the income tax is Dr. Ron Paul–who understands the sound money system which our country was built on, and to which our Republic must return.

When the word of the income tax fraud began to be spread via public meetings in the early 1980’s, IRS agents would show up at these public meeting places and record the license plates of attendees…with the inevitable IRS notice of audit sent along shortly thereafter.  How astounding to find in the ‘confidential’ IRS Tax Audit Guide for Special Agents the following notes:

“An individual taxpayer may refuse to exhibit his books and records for examination on the grounds that compelling him to do so might violate his right against self incrimination under the Fifth Amendment and constitute an illegal search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment”.

Tyranny in America, Part I

©2009 drkate

(Author’s Note.  This is the first of two essays discussing the strategies, tactics, and patterns of the assault on the U.S. Constitution.  This first article examines the attack on our foundational principles: individual liberty and limited government for the people.  The second article looks at the patterns common to the assault on Articles I-V of the Constitution by the Executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.)

What can we see?


The discussion on this blog related to the U.S. Constitution has been undertaken to discuss its enduring application to the problems and opportunities of today.  It is also intended to shine  an intense and relentless spotlight in that place and on those objectives now illegally occupied by Obama and enabled by the  socialist/fascist democrats and RINOs.

Stepping back from the details of the Constitution, the pattern is illuminated: the systematic attack on the Constitution, and how it is enacted through raw power, the stroke of a pen, or slam of a gavel, all the while traumatizing the citizenry.  Pure tyranny.

It is literally the Cloward-Piven tactic directed at the Constitution and government, and accelerated during this time by other captured elements, and it is one element of the strategy to destroy the basis of the Constitution.

Continue reading ‘Tyranny in America, Part I’

The ‘Political Question’

©2009 drkate

In my earlier article on the First Amendment, 912, and the Continental Congress 2009,  I suggested that Article IV, or the “Guarantee Clause”, was an important underlying principle of protecting our ‘republican form of government’, and could prevent the assault on our current Constitutional Republic by fiat or decree by Congress or the Executive.  Specifically, Article IV Section 4 states:

Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

I initially read this to mean that the Federal government cannot move this country to a socialist form of government, because it was required to ensure to each state a government that was a republic.

Continue reading ‘The ‘Political Question’’

The First Amendment, 912, and the Continental Congress 2009

©2009 drkate

At least a million people walked down Pennsylvania Avenue on September 12, stopping at the face of the Newseum, upon which the  text of the First Amendment is inscribed, in moments of profound unity and understanding.

First Amendment, Newseum Bldg, 9/12/09

First Amendment, Newseum Bldg, 9/12/09

And here’s what the First Amendment looks like in practice (h/t Logistics Monster) :

Continue reading ‘The First Amendment, 912, and the Continental Congress 2009’

The Land and Water Czars

©2009 drkate



I am compelled to discuss  further the troubling ‘czar’ development as we now have on the horizon the next step in controlling the very land, water, and air we breathe  (h/t The Dame Truth).  Instead of the czars of land and water coming in the form of individuals, this time they come in the form of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  It is cleverly disguised as “The Clean Water Restoration Act”, and would give jurisdiction of all waters of the United States, and activities that effect those waters (ahem, what doesn’t?) to the Corps and the EPA.

The management of all land, fish, wildlife and timber resources in the  United States, particularly in the west,  is the responsibility of the Department of the Interior, itself containing the U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Mines, Fish & Wildlife Service, Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Indian Affairs.  Two other major federal cabinet agencies are involved in water and land management,  including Commerce and Agriculture.  Oh, and (psst..Corps/EPA…) by the way, water in the desert is a big thing and one better know about snow, ground water, recharge, and water quality.

Continue reading ‘The Land and Water Czars’

Threshold Constitutional Issues: Article II Appointments

©2009 drkate

This is the second article in what this blog has tagged as “Threshold Constitutional Issues”, where a question is posed as to whether an action of Congress, the Executive, or the Courts meets the ‘threshold’ test of compliance with and direction from the Constitution. Yes, legal scholars, Congress, and others more skilled than I should be investigating these issues, reporting, and acting to bring the government’s actions into compliance with the Constitution. But, they’re not, so it is up to us regular citizens to do so.

The first essay in this series highlighted the threshold issue of the Executive’s eligibility per Article II, Section 1.  Because this basic threshold has not been met by the current Executive, it is likely that the other constitutional thresholds are being violated.   Relentlessly, then, every action of this administration and congress must be held up to the light of the Constitution.

This article  discusses the constitutionality of Obama’s  appointment of 44 czars, and takes its root in Article II, Section 2  of the U.S. Constitution.  Seven(7) additional positions are being proposed, including a Voter Lists czar.  Most of the czar positions require no senate confirmation, are unelected, and are accountable only to the President.

Continue reading ‘Threshold Constitutional Issues: Article II Appointments’

March 2019
« Feb    

Get Your Copy at

All Pets Haven

Blog Archives

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Since 8/15/09


Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS American Thinker

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90