Wasserman-Schultz, DNC on Notice

©2011 drkate
Civic Action update at end!

What we have going into 2012 is the experience of the fraud of 2008 and everything we have learned since then about how Article II was breached.  In order for the Democrats to run Obama again in 2012, they are going to have to cheat and commit the same fraud which we have documented fully.

Thus one of the focus areas is to knock Obama off the ballot by confronting officials of the democrat party now before they even start the paper trail of fraud.  Using the fraud statutes of your state it may be possible to to challenge anything suspect submitted by the party to the Secretary of State, whether or not the state has an eligibility statute.

In Arizona, the statute is called the fraudulent scheme and artifice statute. It reads, in pertinent part, that “[a]ny person who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud, knowingly obtains any benefit by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or material omissions” is guilty of a felony (Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-2310(A)).

breaking her oath of office

What will be submitted to your Secretary of State?  Whatever the democrats submit to the State we all know it will be fraudulent, so let’s be ready to challenge them at every step.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz –the new Chair of the DNC–needs to be hounded from day one.  She needs to (1) fail in her mission to breach Article II again, and (2) to lose re-election for Congress while she’s at it.  We don’t need any more progressives to hang around and continue to cost us our country.

I’ve drafted the following letter which I intend to send.  I invite your contributions to make this a strong letter that could also be used as a template for others…thanks in advance!  🙂

Open Letter to Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz:

Dear Congresswoman:

I would normally wish you congratulations on your selection as Chair of the Democratic National Committee, but won’t  this year because you will have to commit fraud once again against the 50 States in order to place  the name  ‘Barack Hussein Obama’ on the 2012 ballot.

The fraud will occur when you authorize the Chair of the Democratic National Convention  to affix their signature to any document that verifies Mr. Obama as constitutionally eligible to serve as President, or alternatively, that does not verify Mr. Obama as meeting the Constitutional requirements for the office yet advances his candidacy anyway.

Please allow me to explain.

In 2008, the DNC sent out two “official” nomination forms to the States for nominees Barack Hussein Obama and Joe Biden to be put on their ballots.  This may have been the first time in history that two different forms were used:

• One form was sent to 49 states and merely stated that Barack Obama/Joe Biden had been ‘duly nominated’ for the position of President/Vice President.
• The other form contained language that Barack Obama/Joe Biden were “legally qualified to serve under the Constitution.” That language was required by State law.

Both of these forms were signed under penalty of perjury by Chair Nancy Pelosi and the Vice Chair of the Convention, and both of these forms are complete fabrications.  The first because it does not verify the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama, and the second because it is a flat out lie.

According to a 2009 memorandum prepared by the Congressional Research Service, no person in Congress, in the judiciary, or the parties had seen any documentation of Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office at the time of nomination, at the electoral college vote, or when Congress confirmed the electoral college vote on January 8, 2009.

Since that time, the only additional documentation that Barack Obama has produced is a forged birth certificate, which is now the subject of a criminal complaint before the FBI.  But as you know, Mr. Obama could have been born in the Lincoln Bedroom and his dual citizenship would still make him ineligible for the Presidency.

Thus, the hurdle you face is convincing an aware public and state officials that Barack Hussein Obama meets the constitutional requirements for the office when you know that he does not.  How will you word the official nomination form?

Respectfully, it will not be possible for you to  pretend to be ‘stupid’ about this issue when so much is already known about Mr. Obama’s inability to qualify for the office he now occupies .  In fact, you and members of the DNC infrastructure could face multiple fraud charges in several states whether that state has an ‘eligibility requirement’ or not:

Many states  maintain a general criminal statute designed to punish fraud. In Arizona, the statute is called the fraudulent scheme and artifice statute. It reads, in pertinent part, that “[a]ny person who, pursuant to a scheme or artifice to defraud, knowingly obtains any benefit by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises or material omissions” is guilty of a felony (Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13-2310(A)).

I am sure you are aware that an election does not overrule Constitutional requirements for the office of the President.  That Barack Hussein Obama is now occupying that office without ever having proven his eligibility is an error originating in 2008 and does not automatically give him a ‘pass’ for 2012.  An unconstitutional act does not create precedent for another when you have the ability to correct it.   In fact, for our Constitution to remain in tact, this error must not be repeated in 2012.

If overcoming Mr. Obama’s constitutional ineligibility wasn’t enough of a hurdle, you will also have to find a way to overcome Mr. Obama’s use of a stolen social security number and his fraudulent Selective Service Registration using that stolen social security number.  As you are aware the penalties for failing to register include ineligibility for any job in the Executive Branch of government and denial of U.S. citizenship if the man first arrived in the United States before his 26th birthday.

You have a clear choice as you proceed as Chair of the DNC with the information I have presented to you. If you continue the fraud of your predecessors and defeat the Constitution of the United States by breaching Article II, you can tell your grandchildren–from your jail cell– that you had a chance to correct an error and didn’t.

If you instead are loyal to your oath to defend the Constitution, and require proof that the Democrat candidate is Constitutionally eligible for the highest office in our land, you can tell your grandchildren that you saved the country and their future.

My best advice to you is to get another candidate for President.

I will not hesitate to continue to watch your actions, to write about them and notice them in public,  and to ready myself at the state level to challenge the party’s placement of Barack Hussein Obama on the ballot.  I will also work tirelessly for your defeat in your bid for re-election to Congress.

Please consider yourself on notice as we will not allow the Democrats to destroy our country.

Sincerely yours,

Update:  Civic Action

Reader Bill put together this postcard idea which can be used with most any article or key message you want to convey.  Post card templates can be made on your computer; labels can make the job easier; and a stamped postcard makes it immediately to the person’s office.  Here is an example made by Bill for this article:

If you use one of my articles, you can sign your own name and refer back to the blog if you wish.  Bill developed the postcards for Kathleen Gotto’s Citizen Letter which are now available for download over at the site One Nation Under Fraud.

Thank you Bill!  🙂