Georgia on My Mind: Full Faith and Credit

©2012 drkate

Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to cheat his way back into the pResidency.

The stunning victory of the Constitutionalists over Barack Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah in Georgia on January 26 was also a victory for the judicial system and the rule of law.  No doubt the pressure on Georgia officials is significant so it is important to remind them of the support that exists for their courage.

Scofflaw

Defiant Obama–nothing new, of course–blows it by not showing up, but when has he ever showed up even through his lawyers?  He has dismissed all of us as just so much toilet paper, and his attack on the judiciary, the people, and the states will not stop with this positive ruling.

The Obama ballot challenge and the Article II SuperPac have had a considerable impact in beginning the process of outright removal of his name from the ballot and has the additional very important impact of raising awareness and doubt about Obama in the electorate.  Rather demoralizing for the Obots, Congress, and the media to have spent their wad, ‘credibility‘, and resources defending a fake, fraud, liar, and criminal, don’t you agree? They will stay home, not vote, and ‘blame it on Bush’.

Its time now to go on the offense and cripple Obama in the states he needs to “win” the election.  Some 130 electoral college votes are needed in the states of Pennsylvania, Florida, Texas, Ohio, and New York in order for Obama to give the appearance of  have(ing) a chance of winning the 2012 election.  Given the Georgia ruling, our next step is…get prepared…use the Constitution: (h/t slcraignbc)

U.S. Constitution Article IV Section 1.

Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.

JUDGMENTS: EFFECT TO BE GIVEN IN FORUM STATE

In General

Article IV, Sec. 1, has had its principal operation in relation to judgments. Embraced within the relevant discussions are two principal classes of judgments. First, those in which the judgment involved was offered as a basis of proceedings for its own enforcement outside the State where rendered, as for example, when an action for debt is brought in the courts of State B on a judgment for money damages rendered in State A; second, those in which the judgment involved was offered, in conformance with the principle of res judicata, in defense in a new or collateral proceeding growing out of the same facts as the original suit, as for example, when a decree of divorce granted in State A is offered as barring a suit for divorce by the other party to the marriage in the courts of State B.

The English courts and the different state courts in the United States, while recognizing “foreign judgments in personam” which were reducible to money terms as affording a basis for actions in debt, originally accorded them generally only the status of prima facie evidence in support thereof, so that the merits of the original controversy could always be opened. When offered in defense, on the other hand, “foreign judgments in personam” were regarded as conclusive upon everybody on the theory that, as stated by Chief Justice Marshall, “it is a proceeding in rem, to which all the world are parties.”

The Obama ballot challenge must move now to these states as a new State Challenge Campaign, and those readers here in those states I would hope would immediately contact the Obama Ballot Challenge and the Article II SuperPac to initiate proceedings:

A State District Court filing of a Show Cause Order asking why the State of (x) should not honor the State of Georgia’s determination under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, addressed to the State Gov., Atty Gen., SoS , and State Election Commission/Board/Agency as Respondents is a logical next step. (h/t slcraignbc).

Already ballot challenges in Illinois and Alabama are underway, for  30 more electoral votes.  If we raise enough awareness and enough challenges to make our state officials pay attention, Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to win the election.

The knowing liar

And don’t forget Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and the report due out in February.  The justice department and individuals have threatened the Sheriff with removal and death, and are finally being held accountable.  I doubt that Arizona will have an easy time of putting him back on the ballot, notwithstanding Governor Brewer’s lack of courage and membership in the usurper’s’ ‘council of governors‘.

We will not forget that everything Obama has signed as an illegal occupant of the White House has no effect in law.  Think of the tens of thousands of people, including our soldiers, that have died under this illegality.

Section 2 of Article 4 states, in part:

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

How correct it would be to have the charges against Obama in any state lead to the arrest and detainment of Obama?  Would it stop his endless campaigning?

No Enthusiasm for the Usurper

Obama has already lost the youth vote to Ron Paul.  There is no enthusiasm for the Obutt or Moose-hell anymore.  Oh, and they’ll have to arrest the OWS people first before they declare martial law, as the Patriots will be at home keeping our power dry.  And there is nothing more ugly than the left scorned.  We told you Obots, you’re the first ones to be detained under martial law.

Get out of Our White House

223 Responses to “Georgia on My Mind: Full Faith and Credit”


  1. 1 drkate January 28, 2012 at 12:03 am

    The Republicans, and sorry to say, Tea Party, seem hell bent on re-electing Obama. Romney, Gingrich, Santorum…especially if they chose Rubio (to get Florida votes) or Jindal (to be politically correct) will blow it faster than you can say ‘boo’.

    No, they won’t ‘allow’ Ron Paul to win the nomination but for the overwhelming (more than 50%) vote in the primaries and a convention hall full of Ron Paul delegates.

    Is a brokered convention our best strategy?

  2. 2 borderraven January 28, 2012 at 12:10 am

    Yes, anyone considering Jindal or Rubio for VP will lose Republican votes, and prove their ignorance of nbc and the Obama mess.

  3. 3 Tenacity January 28, 2012 at 1:32 am

    Some acquaintances of mine.

  4. 4 bill January 28, 2012 at 3:11 am

    Here ia a partial email I received,Please consider it :
    Patriots,

    There is an urgent need to send messages of support to Judge Malihi, the judge who heard the Georgia Obama Ballot Challenge on 1-26-2012. We need to send Judge Malihi a note of thanks for his courage and willingness to stand for the US Constitution.

    Here is Judge Malihi’s web sitefor a better presentation that I have copied below. Send your appreciation to:

    Contact:
    Valerie Ruff for Judge Malihi
    Case Management Assistant
    vruff@osah.ga.gov
    Tel: (404) 651-7595
    Fax: (404) 818-3751

    http://www.osah.ga.gov/judges-dir-detail.aspx?StaffID=mmalihi

    Call, email respectful appreciation. Some have said it’s essential for Judge Malihi to sense that “we the people” are behind him and his action. So let’s remove any doubt the Judge might have of the strong support we’re offering.

    Harry Riley

  5. 8 slcraignbc January 28, 2012 at 6:45 am

    drkate; Thanks for the H/T and the airing of the possibility of invoking the Full Faith and Credit Provision of the Constitution, which was deemed imperative to the establishing the republican form of Guv’mnt, (Rule of Law, not of men), among the various States that were in agreement that a Union was beneficial to the each and to the whole.

    In reading the Election Laws of the Fed and various States you’ll find that a great deal of ‘preferrence’ is given to the Political Parties”, but I see no such preferencepreference within the Constitution with the only words to be pointed to is in the Bill of Rights 1st Amendment,

    “….Congress shall make no law …..abridging…. the right of the people peaceably to assemble,…..” (abridged version separating other rights and distinguishing the ONLY protection that Political Parties enjoy)…..

    But I find no Constitutional provision that invests the various Political Parties with administrative functions related to the interpretations and implementation of Constitutional imperatives beyond those that may be found as the duty of every individual ‘citizen’.

    That the Fed and/or States may have found it expedient to allow for such does not make it Constitutional.

    My point is, going forward, the Political Parties must be taken to task and divested of the ability to put forward candidates independent from ‘legal scrutiny’ of eligibility for any given office.

    (It is possible that most of the laws, rules and regulations of the Federal Election Commission are unconstitutional given that they give ‘preference to “Major Political Parties” to the detriment of any given individual ‘citizen’.)

    These observations are made in conjunction with the prospect of a ‘Full Faith and Credit” action given such a case would be based in large part on any given States “Election Laws”.

    (Also posted at “Libelous”….ooops)

    At / From WND;

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-judge-considered-default-against-obama/

    Earlier, several attorneys who previously took cases challenging Obama’s eligibility as high as the U.S. Supreme Court said Obama’s refusal to participate in the hearing was a travesty.

    “That President Obama’s attorneys didn’t show respect for the court, the citizens, the secretary of state, and the statutes of Georgia reveals the true character of the administration as being completely and utterly against state’s rights,” said attorney Leo Donofrio. “The federal government is growing out of control with every administration and this action today is a loud announcement that this administration is going to do what it likes, and you can imagine that their response to this judiciary would be exactly the same if this had been the U.S. Supreme Court.”

    He said if Georgia does decide to keep Obama off its state election ballots, he won’t appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, “because if he were to lose there, his entire administration would be void, including his appointments to the Supreme Court.”

    “If Obama were to appeal in Georgia, only this election is in play, and only as to Georgia’s ballots, but if he loses in Georgia, appealing to the SCOTUS brings in his entire eligibility, and the legitimacy of his current administration,” Donofrio warned.

    “My personal belief is that if the U.S. Supreme Court held that he was ineligible, he might simply ignore the ruling, and test the will of the nation, just as he is testing the will of the state of Georgia,” he said.

    • 9 Voco Indubium January 28, 2012 at 10:37 am

      Attn.: s l craig

      As usual, you focused on a crucial point. It is enlightening to read your comments.

      I have a friendly debate with one of my friends with regard to the events that occurred in the Georgia court room on the 26th. If you would give us your opinion we would greatly appreciate it.

      The judge asked the three attorneys if they want a summary judgment due to the fact that the defendant did not show. He actually offered it. That would have meant: O not on ballot in Georgia (unless reversed on appeal), as the SoS said that he would follow the judge’s findings.

      All three attorneys rejected the offer. If I were one of the attorneys I would have done the following: I would ask the judge to allow a short conference with my client and one with the other two attorneys. I would have proposed that one of us accept the summary judgment (as the cases are now separated) and the other two don’t.

      The summary judgment would have been an important milestone. That way, they would have achieved some results even if the judge decides to rule against the other two.

      • 10 slcraignbc January 28, 2012 at 11:22 am

        Well, the “default Judgement” that was 1st offered by the Judge would not necessarily refer to any of the allegations by the Plaintiff;s and might even Stipulate that is only the result of the lack of “defense” for being allowed on the Ballot.

        Now, even if it is still termed a “Default Judgment” it has specific ‘evidence entered into the record of the Hearing” in support of the Plaintiff’s allegations.

        In other words, there is now a record beyond just the Defendant not showing up, (which, by the way, can be presumed as a figurative invoking of the 5th whether intended or not.)

        But the bottom line is that we all need to take a deep breath and wait to see if the actual “Advisory” by the Judge is released and what is actually says and then listen carefully to what the Sec 0 State has to say by words and actions.

  6. 12 Tiger 7 January 28, 2012 at 8:01 am

    A brief blurb in the local paper said Bush Sr and Jeb Bush were meeting with bho today in the Oval Office—that might seem odd to antone who had not been following The White Hats reports recently. Hmmm11

    • 13 Katie January 28, 2012 at 10:05 am

      As much as I dislike driving traffic to Pollutico, here’s a picture.

      What a cozy threesome. HW & Jeb at the WH w/ the usurper today. (notice HW is seated in a wheelchair)

      http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/01/obama-hosts-george-hw-and-jeb-bush-at-white-house-112638.html

      • 14 Tenacity January 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

        These three meeting in the open should be of great concern. Nothing good could come from this discussion. I am confident they are not discussion the conditions of their surrender. They all answer to the same masters.

        • 15 heather January 29, 2012 at 7:03 pm

          If anything, it shows that they are all good friends and working on the same page of american destruction. Why else would the bushes be there? They have no reason to stop and drop in on barry—expecially being republicans==tells me they are all 1 in the same!

          And yeah,——-too bad for bush sr in his wheel chair–I have no sympathy for him what so ever–the evil NWO guru who should have said NO WAY to the NWO–and he is a disgrace to the military uniform–a traitor. I have 0 respect for him and his family–all of them. They helped put us where we are and GWB set the table for this financial coup in 08.

    • 16 heather January 29, 2012 at 6:54 pm

      Hmmm–yes I would love to be a fly on the wall in that meeting. I wonder if any msm will release any information…

  7. 17 bill January 28, 2012 at 8:22 am

    Well Tiger 7 ,I imagine BO would be meeting with the janitor if he thought it would help ;) There has also been an idea floated that respective States citizens should
    contact their respective SOSs and ask them to validate BO to be on the ballot.I have already done the first,and am now working on the next .I want to be a pariah just like many of the other Patriots who are standing up.cheers

  8. 20 jacqlynsmith January 28, 2012 at 10:03 am

    Once BO can not be put on the ballot’s then shouldn’t military people like Lakin take him to court again and get their honors back…..I saw where the first military guy Cook I believe passes away recently from cancer……sorry to hear that….wish he would have had some kind of compensation for standing up for the truth before he left this world……GOD BLESS ALL THE GREAT PATRIOTS WHO ARE SPREADING THE MESSAGE OF FREEDOM AND TRUTH! :)

    • 21 sky January 28, 2012 at 10:46 am

      30 little known facts about america on you tube, Does any one know why george hw bush and jeb were doing at the whitehouse?

  9. 22 Tiger 7 January 28, 2012 at 10:43 am

    The photo in Politico is interesting in that each man has a grip on their leg or the chair arm. I wonder what a body language expert would make of that??– A little insecure, maybe???

  10. 23 Michigan-Patriot January 28, 2012 at 10:53 am

    All,
    It is worth giving a listen to the Manning Report’s interview with Carl Swensson relative to his thoughts post Georgia ballot hearing. Linked below. //M-P

  11. 24 Tiger 7 January 28, 2012 at 12:15 pm

    Sky, my guess is that they were planning how to best counter the upcoming exposure of their tremendous money scams. The axe is about to fall, big time.

    • 25 drkate January 28, 2012 at 12:24 pm

      I am with Tenacity…that these three are meeting in the open is NOT a good sign. I would anticipate the following: (a) they are talking about ways to hide the $$, (b) Bush Sr is introducing the ‘brokered republican convention winner’ (Jeb). or (c) they are talking about how to blow the R election so Obama gets back in.

      Glad to see Bush Sr in a wheelchair, getting the rest he needs :wink:

    • 28 drkate January 28, 2012 at 12:25 pm

      I just can’t see the White Hats stuff ever coming true, sorry. Its been leading up and building up for so long, and then there is another ‘delay’.

      • 29 drkate January 28, 2012 at 1:14 pm

        Why republican politicians sell us out:

        http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2012/01/28/why-republican-politicians-sell-us-out/

        An excerpt:
        In other words, the spineless Republicans don’t know what the alternative is to the progressive agenda. They don’t know that Our Constitution created a Congress with limited and enumerated powers. They don’t know that the President’s powers are “carefully limited; both in … extent and …duration” 2 They don’t understand that limited civil government is morally superior to a fascist dictatorship. Since they don’t understand these things, they are buffeted here and there by winds which progressives blow.

        Spineless Republicans are “nice”. They are “patriotic”. And that’s it. But they are men of straw because they stand for nothing. They have no Standard to guide them. So they go with the flow.

        • 30 Tenacity January 28, 2012 at 1:37 pm

          Of course They* know. We must distinguish between the voters of the Republican Party (and there are factions within them) and the bankster bought off establishment (part of They*). They* are behind both parties and the media and They* know full well. They are cowards because They* operate from closed rooms with esoteric agendas, not because They* don’t know. Spineless only if you consider a thief in the night spineless. Try it sometime and doubt you will find it a spineless affair. Their* agenda and tactics are bold and without conscience…evil…deeply demented.

  12. 31 Jan January 28, 2012 at 3:08 pm

    I would suggest that if you don’t know where your state stands, or if a complaint has been registered with the SoC go to the following web site. At the very top of the page all states are listed, click on your state and see the current status of any complaints filed or the actual rules your state must follow.

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/texas

  13. 32 no-nonsense-nancy January 28, 2012 at 5:50 pm

    Today I attended a meeting of the PA GOP because the elected state committee people were voting on whether to allow the state GOP to endorse a person to each of 4 offices coming up for elections in our primary. The one important offfice is to replace Bob Casey as US Senator. This would create a closed primary, basically, because all of the GOP money would go to that person. I happen to be for Sam Roher, a very good constitutional conservative, but there are 7 very qualified peole running for tht office. A large group of us were there to make it known that we want and expect an open primary with no endorsements. govenor Tomm corbett is endorseing someone other thatn Sam, who incidently ran against Corbett in the primary for gov. two years ago. In the end they voted for endorsements which makes us very angry. I got to witness the integtity of the PA GOP.(snark)

    Anyway, I was in the hallway where they had various GOP buttons, pins, etc. for sale. I noticed a large board with pins of the presidential candidates. There were pins of Romney, Gingrich and Santorum, but NO Ron Paul pins. I ouldn’t just walk away at this autrocity. So I said to the man at the table selling the items that it isas if Ron Paul isn’t even running because there were none of his pins there. He stated tht it because Ron Paul just do not sell and that they don’t carry pins of candidates that don’t sell. I just smiled and said, “That’s going to change”.
    Can you frickin beleive it?

    • 33 Jan January 28, 2012 at 6:34 pm

      Nancy, ask to see a copy of the by-laws. I’m not sure this is something they can just change.
      If the by-laws state the GOP cannot endorse candidates in the Primary, then it sounds like they have overstepped their bounds. There should be a set of by-laws for the State GOP and also sets for each County separately.

      • 34 no-nonsense-nancy January 28, 2012 at 7:43 pm

        Jan, apparently the GOP in this state has been doing this in the primary since 2007 if I heard right today. they are very slick. They tried several inethical maneuvers today but were stopped. They tried to have a yea and nea vote and it was demanded that they have a roll call vote. With 67 counties it took forever but was worth it. It is obvious that even on such a low level office such as state committee person they don’t care what the people want. Two years ago the GOP endorded Corbett for gov. in the primary and Sam lost the primary. I think Corbett is playing payback by endorseing Sam’s opponet.

    • 35 Ann January 28, 2012 at 6:54 pm

      Acccck! That’s so wrong! The idiotic media does the same thing…just pretend he’s not there and maybe he’ll go away. Sheesh! Stupid idiots.

    • 36 sky January 28, 2012 at 7:26 pm

      Then make signs for RON PAUL show him were interested,Flyers,etc,

    • 37 heather January 29, 2012 at 8:02 pm

      Thats a lie NNN–of course they sell–they just didnt buy any……….they are terrified of RP winning–he stands for the constitution and that means no more hands in our pockets and no more corruption—and without corruption, the criminals — state and fed, can’t live high on the hog anymore!

  14. 38 no-nonsense-nancy January 28, 2012 at 5:55 pm

    Forgive all of y typos in the above comment. The print is so light and my eyes are bad making it very hard to see. I don’t have spell check on this. Need to figure out how to get it.

  15. 43 Ann January 28, 2012 at 7:06 pm

    I have a dumb question so bear with me. lol IF your State doesn’t have a law that says the POTUS candidates have to meet Constitutional eligibility, like mine, does anyone have a chance in he11 of keeping him off the ballot in those states?? I’m really disgusted that mine doesn’t and I’m sure a lot of others are the same so what do people do in that case? Since I worked for a lawyer for 24+ years I’m always looking at that angle, the legal side. Are we just spinning our wheels in other states?? Does anyone know the answer to that?

    • 44 cedartree January 28, 2012 at 7:28 pm

      It can be three levels
      1. Nothing but the candidate’s signature
      2. Proof of identity
      or
      3. Proof of Constitutional eligibility

      Obama was known to have attested to his eligibility in some states like Arizona without showing any documents, also Texas, Georgia, Hawaii and Alabama too I believe

    • 45 drkate January 28, 2012 at 9:12 pm

      Check the fraud statutes in your state. If fraudulent documents are submitted to the SoS, there may be an opportunity to intervene. We know his documents are fraudulent, and even raising this issue in a letter to the editor with the Sos would be good. Also, call up the DNC and ask them what documents they are submitting.

      In 2008 Pelosi certified to 50 states that Obama met the constitutional qualifications–this is the form they sign after the nomination at the Democratic convention. The form has to say the nominees are constitutionally qualified. There is a small window after the nomination and before the name goes on the ballot to try this angle.

      • 47 cedartree January 28, 2012 at 9:16 pm

        I don’t believe he ever showed any documentation anywhere, the very best he ever did was “attest” to being eligible or get Pelosi to certify him without any documents.

        I think they were terrified to actually link Obama with a piece of paper, it’s all had deniability, not plausible deniability, just deniability…always a distancing.

        If a reporter were to show Obama a copy of his long form birth certificate and ask him if this was his, I’m sure he’d weasel out of answering.

      • 55 Ann January 28, 2012 at 9:44 pm

        Thanks Dr. Kate! Never thought of the fraud angle. Good thinking! If I’m not mistaken, Pelosi signed 2 certifications. One with the constitutional language and one without it. No clue why but I’ve seen them both and they’re signed and notarized exactly alike. WND has a copy of them and so does the Canada Free Press. Corruption in it’s purest form!

        • 56 drkate January 28, 2012 at 10:03 pm

          And this year they will have to do the same, sign something that says these boobs are qualified. That is the moment to strike!

  16. 57 Elizabeth January 28, 2012 at 7:30 pm

    This is my opinion so I hope that it isn’t too presumptuous,
    since I feel like a voice crying in the wilderness ~~lol…

    but I do want to reiterate how magnificent a candidate Dr. Laurie
    Roth is, an Independent, and bemoan that she is being overlooked
    by everyone who should be paying attention to her platform.

    Below is the link to her message, which is on GulagBound,
    since Post&Email is still under maintenance.

    Take some time to read her thoughts. I am very much
    taken aback that this woman does not have a visible
    following nor is ever mentioned by anyone as potential
    for the presidency.

    There are none in the past decades of elections
    that I would have ever voted for as confidently as I would for
    this woman.

    She is really a” breath of fresh air” as one blogger
    put it, and maybe that is why she MOST LIKELY will not ever win
    the position of saving this country.

    Sadly, she needs more publicity and a chance to be seen and heard
    by more people than those who read Post&Email and other conservative
    boards.

    From years of watching the fallacies of presidents that were
    vociferous on all their plans to make America the best country
    in the world, and who, as time went by, became wishy-washy
    non-entities, bringing us down and leading us astray,

    (excluding Ronald Reagan and Eisenhower)

    I am betting that whoever else is elected, whether it is Ron Paul
    or one of the other so-so hopefuls,

    not one of them will ever be the answer to America’s woes.

    America will always regret whoever they elect. It is the
    destined pattern.

    Since she is a ‘dark horse’ so to speak, she may be
    overlooked, and that is a loss for America;

    she could change that fated pattern of failure.

    http://gulagbound.com/25540/obama-a-very-angry-outsider-is-coming-for-you-in-november/

  17. 58 cedartree January 28, 2012 at 7:33 pm

    Lamecherry said that blowfly was eating Reggie/Obama shared poo juice (nom nom nom)…blowflies cannot resist poo
    LOL I really miss lamecherry, what happened to him?

    • 59 drkate January 28, 2012 at 8:38 pm

      I believe LC is taking a break…

      • 60 cedartree January 28, 2012 at 9:16 pm

        I get the impression by his posted poem that his mother passed away.

        • 61 heather January 29, 2012 at 8:08 pm

          I thought so at first too, but I am beginning to think it was her. If you go to her website and read past posts LC lets it slip that she is female. Next time I find that one article I will link it but tonight I am too tired.

          • 62 drkate January 29, 2012 at 8:19 pm

            Sorry to disappoint, but LC is a ‘he’. Known for a fact. I am sure you agree that LC’s writing style has lots of hidden gems and clues…including clues to ‘throw you off’ just when you think you can identify him/her. Bottom line, it is the words of LC that are important, and what LC has been trying to tell us for a long time. Conservatives have jeered, ridiculed, and TPTB have attacked him. LC is taking leave, and I am sure the work continues in some way. Notice the site remains up as does the facebook and myspace pages. Read, re-read, and learn. :smile:

            Would the substance of those words mean something different if LC was male or female? Didn’t think so.

  18. 63 no-nonsense-nancy January 28, 2012 at 7:53 pm

    POTUS went ROGUE the other day and put up some Bushisms which Obama went ahead and read. There were 2 G-words in one sentence. Now they are in lockdown until they find the culprit who entered that on to POTUS, according to MOTUS
    http://www.michellesmirror.com.

  19. 64 sky January 28, 2012 at 8:33 pm

    financialsense.com right side column transscript for Ann Barnhardt interview,Jan 28th2012

  20. 65 Ann January 28, 2012 at 9:52 pm

    I just read that Herman Cain is endorsing Newt. Oh boy, here we go. I also read that Bachmann isn’t endorsing anyone in the GOP race. Says a lot about her IMO. I thought she was friends with Ron Paul?

    • 66 Sovereign Soul January 30, 2012 at 12:08 am

      If the Republican Party has a death wish, they will nominate Newt Gingrich as their Presidential candidate. Gingrich is a snake-oil salesman; his words are absolutely meaningless; he has the morals of an alley cat; and he will sell America’s sovereignty to an international New World Order and turn our country into a police state. Christians, of all people, should know better. Newt Gingrich? Really? Pastor Chuck Baldwin, 1/26/12

  21. 67 Michigan Gal January 28, 2012 at 10:40 pm

    Can someone help me sort this out?  I read somewhere in the past few days that if Georgia keeps Obama’s name off the ballot, that they will replace his name with the words Democratic Party.  Wouldn’t that then give democrats so many delegates or electors (primary or general election) who could in turn vote for Obama?Remember Michigan in 2008.  Obama was not on the ballot in the primary.  (He requested his name be withdrawn in protest of Michigan moving up the primary date.  I believe Hillary was suppose to withdraw also, but didn’t get around to it.)The media beat the drums steadily that a vote for “other” was a vote for Obama.  Anyway, Hillary won.  But, it was close.  So, when the DNC met to decide how to punish Michigan and Florida, they gave all those votes to Obama and also gave him some of Hillary’s delegates.Could something like this happen again?

    • 68 drkate January 28, 2012 at 10:43 pm

      only by the DNC breaking its rules. And you can’t vote for a generic democrat, so I think this may be trouble. they can always write the obutt in. Send all this stuff to the Obama ballot challenge for their examination. I am sure they will know what to do

  22. 71 Michigan Gal January 28, 2012 at 11:15 pm

    I don’t think other was the right word, but it was something like that. Anyway, there were other Democrats running in Michigan in 2008. They still determined that those votes were for Obama. Our primary is February 7th. Thank you for info about the Obama ballot challenge.

  23. 72 SirLurksAlot January 28, 2012 at 11:38 pm

    Way O/T, but I gotta do it. I’m way old but this tingled my loins…I’m gonna gird if I can….

    http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=116288

  24. 76 Papoose January 29, 2012 at 2:57 am

    a blast from the past

    RIP Ms Bhutto. i remember. iowa and you.

  25. 79 Papoose January 29, 2012 at 3:14 am

    why~

    in our own day and age. genesis

  26. 83 Mick January 29, 2012 at 7:32 am

    “At CW:

    “This is MoniQue from moniquemonicat blog. I sent requests to 50+ Secretary of State offices through the Public Records Act (PRA) requesting Obama’s original filing papers for each state and some other docs too.

    Attached is one I just got back from THE SOS IN ARIZONA.

    A NOTARIZED AND SIGNED BY OBAMA SWEARING AND CERTIFYING HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. HIS SIGNATURE IS ON THIS DOCUMENT TESTIFYING HE IS “A NATURAL BORN U.S. CITIZEN.”

    [go to link]

    http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/obama-not-eligible-obama-not-natural-born-citizen-obama-signature-on-arizona-candidate-nomination-paper-moniquemonicat-blog-did-obama-commit-fraud-did-obama-lie/

    There is a box next to the line the reads “I am a natural born Citizen,,,” that was left empty of a mark. That box is left out of this copy (photoshopped?). Obama did not pledge an oath to anything where the box was left empty. His campaign website, http://www.AttackWatch.com , paid for by Obama for America says he is an “American-born Citizen”. The lack of an “X” in that box is further evidence that he evades pledging that he is eligible, and that the Az. SOS is allowing that evasion. Obama continues to engauge in lawyerly wordsmithing, and has NEVER said he was a natural born Citizen, in plain words.

  27. 85 no-nonsense-nancy January 29, 2012 at 7:46 am

    A very good article comparing the candidates.

    http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin685.htm

  28. 86 Martha Trowbridge January 29, 2012 at 10:40 am

    “The Republicans, and sorry to say, Tea Party, seem hell bent on re-electing Obama.”

    Dr. Kate: It may be best to see what transpires over the next week re: “Obama”.

    With all that’s erupting, most likely he will not be a candidate.

    • 87 Troy January 29, 2012 at 11:08 am

      Oh yes he will be….We will have to vote him out in spite of the up coming rigged election.

    • 88 drkate January 29, 2012 at 2:45 pm

      I sure hope that would be possible, but I believe he will be a candidate no matter what. His ego is too big to withdraw, and his handlers may have lost control over him. He will not go quietly, and the Rs will refuse to put up someone who could ‘beat’ him.

      I hope I am wrong, but I don’t have that sense that he will bow out.

  29. 89 Quantum Leap January 29, 2012 at 2:31 pm

    Jan Brewer is trending today.

    Newt is nearly 70 and DR Paul is in wayyyyyyy better shape at 76. Newt looks like he shops at a thrift store…a really bad one. He is wearing bedraggled, ill-fitting clothes from the 90’s and earlier. I will throw up thinking that his 3rd wife could be First Lady. We now have a mean, drug addicted racist as first lady and that’s bad enough. To have an adulterer as first lady who thought is was okay to date a married man is sickening and I’m not a social conservative. Newton is a social conservative when it’s convenient for him-like it doesn’t apply to him. He looks sickly, gluttonous and out of shape.

    Newton Leroy “Newt” Gingrich ( /ˈnuːt ˈɡɪŋɡrɪtʃ/; born Newton Leroy McPherson; June 17, 1943)

    Just call him ‘nut’. He is very crazy. Look at this pic and tell me do people really want this guy as their president? http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/gingrich-campaign-traveling-press-own-damn-ride-014411649.html He is nuttier than a fruitcake saying

    By the end of my second term, we will have the first permanent base on the moon and it will be American,”

    Where will the funds for that come from anyway? He is a mental case.
    Newton Leroy McPherson Gingrich even envisions a moon state Saying:

    “When we have 13,000 Americans living on the moon, they can petition to become a state,” he said,

    KUCKOO!!!!!!!!!

    Cain and Sarah and others must have been paid off handsomely to endorse him and were likely promised a job in his admin for thier support.

    They kicked Cain out because of his past sexual indiscretions but not Newton? This smells.

    Ignoring Dr Paul is going to backlash. This election sounds like it’s between Romney and Newt. WHY? ’cause that way if one loses the other wins. Both are big banker puppets and NWO cronies like obama is.

    NNN. I hope you do sell Ron Paul buttons and signs. Make some extra $ while doing it too. I saw a website that let’s you order cheap super brochures. You can get 100 for around $6.00 with free shipping. Can you search it? Did I post it on the last thread or did I forget? The prices were awesome. You’d have to pass them out yourself though. No super mailer. It would be nice if Dr Paul got most of PA’s delegates.

    Newton is nasty. He kicked the press off his plane. He can’t find anyone to work with him for long. He’s not exactly what you would say “able to negotiate anything.” It’s ‘his way or the highway’. He is disgusting. Look at him. He’s a heart attack waiting to happen.

    I’m expecting a miracle for Dr Paul. His wife of 54 years would make a great first lady. She has a cookbook out called ‘The Paul cookbook’. I may buy it.

    Sorry peeps, but I can’t vote for Newton Leroy McPherson. Why’d he change his last name anyway?

    Did anyone find out why the UN building in DC was storing 30,000 pounds of cocaine? Is that the obama’s stash for their parties? For congressional parties?

    • 90 slcraignbc January 29, 2012 at 3:27 pm

      I find it interesting and, at the same time difficult, to understand how it is possible for anyone that adheres to the goal of defeating the current regime has found a way to support any of the various candidates of the broken GOP at this stage of the game.

      I would much rather that the dialog be measured as ANY vote for ANYONE other than the ‘0’ is a Vote AGAINST SOCIALISM and to forge and temper that message into hardened steel.

      Not one in the field should be allowed to consider them-selves as being elected as OUR Leader. but rather should be warned that they are to FOLLOW the will of the Constitution which serves as the Will of the People and which the People wish to FOLLOW.

      Not through a maze of new laws, rules, regulations and policies, but rather the simple and common sense 1st Principles of limited Guv’mnt with limited intrusions among the States, whose SECURITY is manifest with a diligent and vigilant Foreign Policy of restrained force among friends and preemptive self-defense among those who CHOOSE to be enemies.

      I would suggest that it would be prudent that the ‘opponent’ be termed as they ARE, SOCIALIST, and support ALL of the candidates that JOIN OUR, We the Peoples, opposition to THAT opponent.

    • 91 Katie January 29, 2012 at 3:38 pm

      Please stop repeating the falsehood that Palin “endorsed Gingrich”. She did no such thing. Just last night in two different interviews she was asked AGAIN if she was endorsing him. She said she wants this process to continue so that the vetting continues. If Romney wins, the “news” will be that’s it’s all over and as a Paul supporter, you should be cheering her on for trying to keep the game in play so the voters all learn the truth.

      She’s roaring against obama and the socialist policies, she’s roaring against the propagandists, and she’s especially roaring against the GOP/RNC machine. Her own Facebook post says very clearly:

      “But this whole thing isn’t really about Newt Gingrich vs. Mitt Romney. It is about the GOP establishment vs. the Tea Party grassroots and independent Americans who are sick of the politics of personal destruction used now by both parties’ operatives with a complicit media egging it on. In fact, the establishment has been just as dismissive of Ron Paul and Rick Santorum. Newt is an imperfect vessel for Tea Party support, but in South Carolina the Tea Party chose to get behind him instead of the old guard’s choice. In response, the GOP establishment voices denounced South Carolinian voters with the same vitriol we usually see from the left when they spew hatred at everyday Americans “bitterly clinging” to their faith and their Second Amendment rights. The Tea Party was once again told to sit down and shut up and listen to the “wisdom” of their betters. We were reminded of the litany of Tea Party endorsed candidates in 2010 that didn’t win. Well, here’s a little newsflash to the establishment: without the Tea Party there would have been no historic 2010 victory at all.”

      • 92 slcraignbc January 29, 2012 at 3:53 pm

        Yes, the way I heard and understood Sarah’s ‘endorsement’ was only for the So. Carolina Primary, i.e., “if I could vote there I’d vote for the chameleon, ahhh, errr, Newt……..”

        • 93 drkate January 29, 2012 at 3:55 pm

          Palin/West–brokered convention winners
          Paul–Treasury Secretary
          Romney–Commerce Department (?)
          Santorum–HHS
          Gingrich–??? but NOT SoS

          The FED to be abolished.

          • 94 slcraignbc January 29, 2012 at 4:15 pm

            Gingrich to the Department of Education with the Executive mandate to return control back to the States on a 3 R’s curriculum taught in English and base ALL social references to the real and moral American History………

            …as for the rest of your list……..from your keyboard to God’s ear…….

      • 95 Katie January 29, 2012 at 3:54 pm

        She mentions Ron Paul several times, and no where in this interview is there an “endorsement” of Gingrich. You’re perceptive – read between the lines. Right now she’s taking the battle to the GOP elites/RNC to stop their “chosen one”.

    • 97 no-nonsense-nancy January 29, 2012 at 6:07 pm

      QL, I can’t find the SB for the price you were saying. The cheapest I saw was $18 or $19. I would buy some for $6 or so but I just am very short of cash right now.

    • 100 drkate January 29, 2012 at 2:59 pm

      They mis-reported as usual…said there would be ‘more arguments’ Feb 5 (now Feb 1), but of course the judgment will be issued then.

  30. 101 slcraignbc January 29, 2012 at 3:41 pm

    Re: The Message……..such as this..;

    Allen West Tells Liberal Leaders To “Get The Hell Out Of The USA”

    “Take your message of equality of achievement, take your message of economic dependency, take your message of enslaving the entrepreneurial will and spirit of the American people somewhere else. You can take it to Europe, you can take it to the bottom of the sea, you can take it to the North Pole, but get the hell out of the United States of America,” Rep. Allen West (R-FL) said at the Palm Beach County Republican Party Lincoln Day dinner. West represents the district in the U.S. Congress.

    on video….. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/28/allen_west_tells_liberal_leaders_to_get_the_hell_out_of_the_usa.html

  31. 108 Troy January 29, 2012 at 6:11 pm

    Special Broadcast tonight from Las Vegas!
    Live from the CSPOA Constitutional Sheriff’s Conference at the Tuscany Hotel.

    Join Terry Dodd for a live report from the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (COSPA) Conference from Las Vegas, NV. Terry will report live from the conference.

    CSPOA mission: To educate and equip sheriffs, peace officers and public officials with the necessary information and public support to carry out their duties in accordance with their Oath of Office.

    The county sheriff is the line in the sand. The county sheriff is the one who can say to the feds, “Beyond these bounds you shall not pass.” This is not only within the scope of the sheriff’s authority; it’s the sheriff’s sworn duty. And what about the little guys; the individual police officers? It’s all about judgement calls. When you pull over a frazzled apologetic mother with a minivan full of crazed kids who has just ‘rolled’ a stop sign, do you treat her the same as you would a pack of bad-mouthed teenagers in a hot rod that smells like dope for the same offense? The people of this land would certainly hope that you would have more charity than that, and we at the CSPOA believe that you do.

    http://www.cspoa.org/intro.php

    Join us for this special broadcast of Walls In Our Minds
    Join Terry Dodd, Red Beckman, & Dr. Kate TONIGHT!

    The show runs from 8 to 9:30 p.m. Eastern Time or 6 to 7:30 p.m. Mountain, January 29th.

    Listen to the stream or join the online chat this Sunday evening at:

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/drkate/2012/01/30/revolution-radio-constitutional-sheriffs-conference-live

    Call-in Number: (347) 838-9176

  32. 109 cedartree January 29, 2012 at 6:14 pm

    Obama Attorney Knows Eligibility Hearing was Disaster for His Client

    Doug Book says though we’ll not know the outcome of the Georgia hearing regarding ballot eligibility for the nation’s number 1 undocumented worker until the first part of February, Barack Obama’s high-powered attorney apparently suffered an attack of rapid, shallow breathing just before the courtroom drama was about to unfold.

    One day prior to the scheduled hearing before Administrative Judge Michael Malihi, Obama attorney Michael Jablonski addressed both a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp AND an email, directed to the Secretary via one of the court’s hearing officers, asking Kemp to cancel the hearing.

    Georgia law allows “any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” to file an objection to that candidate’s inclusion on the State ballot. (1)

    Such objection filings go to the Secretary of State who makes a determination to either overrule or pass them along to the State Administrative Court for disposition. Michael Malihi was the Administrative Judge to whom a number of these objections were directed by the Secretary and he found them worthy of pursuing in court.

    The dozens of similar suits questioning Obama’s eligibility, filed in other venues around the nation were dismissed because the plaintiffs “lacked standing” — that is, were unable to prove direct, personal damage if Obama were to be permitted to remain in or run again for the office he holds.

    But Georgia law trumped that defense, throwing Obama and Jablonski into uncharted waters. And forced to follow the new tack of actually having to lawfully and properly PROVE Obama’s eligibility, in the weeks since the original filing, Jablonski had pretty much emptied his quiver on behalf of the acting president.

    On January 3rd his motion for an outright dismissal of the lawsuits was denied by Judge Malihi. And on Friday the 20th, his motion to quash subpoenas demanding the presence of Obama in the courtroom along with original copies of his Hawaii birth certificate and all Social Security information was denied as well.

    But what degree of audacity, arrogance, hutzpah and perhaps downright panic does it require to demand that the Georgia Secretary of State cancel arguably the most anticipated hearing in state history less than 24 hours before its scheduled start? Never mind that it was Secretary Kemp who believed the suits had enough merit to be explored in the first place!

    Jablonski’s letter alternately reads like a threat, a whine and a prayer as he misstates Georgia statute, belittles Judge Malihi, refers to irrelevant previous findings and ultimately states that because he and his revered client are not receiving the absolute acquiescence they so richly deserve at the hands of these minor Georgia officials, they will take their marbles and go home.

    Indeed, so much in a dither was the mighty mouthpiece, he actually winds up his petulant epistle by telling Secretary Kemp that he doesn’t have the legal right to inconvenience the president in the first place! “…No law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot,” writes Jablonski. “…The attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.” (2)

    It is not difficult to imagine Jablonski writing these words as he wags a finger in Kemp’s face while threatening to hold his breath until he turns blue!

    In his written reply to Jablonski, Kemp briefly corrects the attorney’s incorrect reading of Georgia statute while issuing a friendly though unmistakably direct warning: “…if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.” (3)

    Obama supporters and other useful idiots around the country are laughing at what they consider the efforts of a backward, Southern state to capture the national spotlight for its 15 minute allowance of fame.

    But rest assured that Michael Jablonski does NOT see the humor! And Americans who recognize Barack Hussein Obama for who and what he is might be a fortnight away from breaking news which even the New York Times will be forced to print.

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/152218#.TyXux1yww6E

    • 110 Quantum Leap January 29, 2012 at 10:10 pm

      Obama’s high-powered attorney apparently suffered an attack of rapid, shallow breathing just before the courtroom drama was about to unfold.

      :lol: Because HE KNOWS OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE SO HE PANICKED.

      He had a panic attack knowing obama can’t provide the docs. Not only was he required to show the original long form BC he was required to show his college transcripts to prove he didn’t attend on a foreign grant. ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah :grin:

      Administrative court makes the rules and can change them at any time. :lol:

      By not showing up for his court proceeding obama pleaded GUILTY BY DEFAULT. That’s the law. Always has been and always will be.

      Case is closed with pending sentencing…………………

      {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{SNORT}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

      Now can the punking of the people by obummer finally stop?

      Love it.

      Prove it or remove him. Do you like my slogan?

      simple

      PROVE IT OR REMOVE HIM NOW!

  33. 119 cedartree January 29, 2012 at 6:44 pm

    “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

    Full analysis of Obama eligibility hearing
    Craig Andresen says for the first time, in Georgia, the question of Obama’s eligibility to serve, became official.  No longer the stuff of speculation, no longer dismissible by liberals as something which will never be heard in court, Obama’s eligibility became a matter of an official court record. What does it mean? To answer that, one must look at the reason for the hearing to begin with. For years, Orly Taitz and the Liberty Legal Foundation along with others, have questioned Obama’s legal right to serve.  For years, that argument centered on the birth certificate and whether or not Obama was born in the United States.  What made this case and this hearing different, is that it mattered not where Obama was born rather, at the center of the stage, would be the nationality of Obama’s father.  Obama’s father was never a U. S.  Citizen and a great deal of evidence to that point was entered  into the official record Thursday morning.  Another linchpin in all of this, is the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” which one must be, by writ of the Constitution, to hold the office of President.  According to the plaintiffs in this hearing, that definition can be clearly found in the written opinion of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Minor vs Happersett from 1875.  That opinion, which by the way is backed up by several other Supreme Court opinions, states that for one to be a “Natural Born Citizen” both of one’s parents must be U. S.  Citizens.  There is no opinion offered, at any time, by the Supreme Court in conflict with this definition and as the attorneys made clear this morning, while some lower court opinions say something else, they do not override nor do they directly conflict with, the Supreme Court decision from 1875. If that definition is upheld, Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen and therefore has no standing to hold the office of President as per the Constitution. This hearing Thursday certainly didn’t end there. 
    Also entered into evidence were documents, discs and expert testimony calling into question the legitimacy of Obama’s birth certificate, his Social Security number, his father’s immigration status, his real name and indeed Obama’s own citizenship status.All of this in the effort to have Obama’s name kept off the Georgia ballot in 2012. Here is where it become even more interesting. After being subpoenaed to appear and after an endless stream of excuses as to why he shouldn’t, neither Obama nor his attorney were at the hearing. This means, all the evidence and all the expert testimony was entered into the official record without a response, a peep, or a rebuttal from Obama or his attorney. At this point, all of it remains unchallenged.  All of it. 
    This begs the question; Can a sitting President be commanded by subpoena, to appear in court? Many claim Executive Privilege prevents it. They would be wrong. While EP can be claimed and upheld in cases of National Security or where it interferes with sensitive issues of security or the military, in other actions, outside those parameters, a court can compel even a sitting President to adhere to the rule of law.
    In United States v.  Nixon (1974), the Supreme Court of the United States, citing many landmark cases, including Chief Justice Marshall’s opinions Marbury v.  Madison (1803)and United States v.  Burr, said that it was incumbent on the High Court to balance between the president’s need for confidentiality in executing his constitutional duties, on the one hand, and “the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice,” on the other.  The Court’s unanimous opinion delivered by Chief Justice Warren E.  Burger was careful to give great credence to the president’s need for complete candor and objectivity from his advisors.  The justices also recognized the need for a great degree of confidentiality for the internal deliberations of the executive branch of government.  Chief Justice Burger agreed that, if military or diplomatic secrets were at stake, the Court might reach a different conclusion.  However, given that President Nixon’s claims were based on a blanket statement of executive privilege without claiming that any state secrets were at stake, the constitutional duty of the courts is to guarantee due process of law, something that Nixon’s actions were gravely impairing, according to the Court.  The justices ruled that President Nixon had to comply with the subpoena duces tecum issued by Chief Judge John J.  Sirica of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.  Nixon immediately prepared to turn over the subpoenaed materials to Chief Judge Sirica. 

    Presidents since Nixon have continued to claim that the special place the presidency holds under America’s constitutional system demands that much of its internal deliberations remain secret and privileged.  When faced with investigations, special prosecutors, subpoenas, and impeachment proceedings, President William J.  Clinton, for example, claimed that much of what went on in the Oval Office was protected by executive privilege and executive immunity, and that he and his aides should not have to respond to subpoenas.  As was the case with President Nixon, President Clinton eventually accepted his and his office’s place under the rule of law.  Since United States v.  Nixon, executive branch claims of immunity from the normal processes of the American legal system have been tempered by the fact that the constitutional demands of due process of law and justice are likely to outweigh claims of executive immunity from subpoenas. 
    It is yet to be seen whether the court in Georgia will take action regarding Obama’s failure to appear and the failure of his attorney to participate. For those in the conservative blogosphere, this IS a story and IS newsworthy? How often is a sitting President subpoenaed? How often has a sitting President’s eligibility to appear on a state ballot been questioned in court? How often has a sitting President’s birth certificate been questioned as fake under oath? How often has a sitting President’s eligibility to hold office been testified to in court? How often has a sitting President’s nationality been testified to in court? This is news.  Regardless of what side one takes…This is news.  Never before has a sitting President’s Social Security numbers been shown by evidence and sworn testimony in court as being fraudulent.  The SS number assigned to Barack Obama is from a man born in 1890.  It was issued in Connecticut to Obama in 1977 but at that time, again according to sworn testimony and evidence in court, Obama was living in his mother’s house in Hawaii.  One witness in court testified that Obama’s SS number was run through the E-Verify system, the system used to validate a person’s citizenship, and it came back as a high degree of being fraudulent. Anyway one looks at this, it is news. 
    At the end of the 2 hour hearing, Judge Michael Malihi adjourned the hearing gathered up all the evidence and the court reporters transcript and returned to his chambers. 
     
    At this time, we wait, for how long, we don’t know, for his decision as to whether or not Obama’s name is eligible to appear on the 2012 Georgia ballot. One can easily suspect, that should he find against Obama in this hearing, a tidal wave of similar cases will be filed in other states.  Already, similar cases are pending in some states.  Orly Taitz, the Liberty Legal Foundation and others stand ready to carry forward in such cases. 
    We also await a decision as to what, if any action, might be taken regarding Obama’s failure to appear and his attorney’s decision to simply not participate under a court subpoena.  Why, if as liberals have claimed for years, all of this is folly and easily dismissed by “facts,” did Obama’s attorney not simply present those “facts” and put an end to it? It would seem that letting it all go unchallenged clearly adds fuel to the fire.  The mere presentation of evidence and sworn testimony today lends a great deal of credibility to the arguments as it is now a matter of official record.  A default judgment should be rendered and no doubt, it will be appealed but we suspect the judge will disallow Obama’s name from appearing on the Georgia ballot.  No doubt too, other states will begin to file similar complaints.  The final questions, left unanswered and unchallenged by Obama and his attorney are…Who is this guy Obama really? Who is this who by evidence presented lived in Indonesia and Hawaii at the exact same time? Who is this guy whose SS number indicates he is more than 120 years old and lived in a state in which he never lived.  Who is this guy who has been known by at least 3 different names? Who is this guy to which evidence in court indicates is a citizen of Indonesia? Who is this Obama whose birth certificate, shown in evidence and sworn testimony, has been created through layering and computer manipulation and has serial numbers out of sequence with those of others born in the claimed hospital within 24 hours of his supposed birth?
     
    Whoever he is…Whoever he really is…he now occupies the oval office. 
     http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&key=ccc2217bc2b75c4bdf5f7e57267f0464&loc=http%3A%2F%2Ftheobamafile.websitetoolbox.com%2Fpost%2FLive-thread-Ballot-challenge-hearings-(Georgia)-5679903%3Ftrail%3D100&v=1&libid=1327885976903&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thenationalpatriot.com%2F%3Fp%3D4149&ref=http%3A%2F%2Ftheobamafile.websitetoolbox.com%2Fpost%2FLive-thread-Ballot-challenge-hearings-(Georgia)-5679903&title=Live%20thread%3A%20Ballot%20challenge%20hearings%20(Georgia)%20-%20The%20Obama%20File&txt=says&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13278878115096

  34. 120 Paula January 29, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    I’ve seen it mentioned a couple of places on here that AL will not allow Obama on the ballot until a court hearing of ballot challenges. The only thing I found was something to the contrary, posted here:

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/alabama

    :o( Too bad. I hope AL has an honorable judge to deal with somewhere that will allow the people to contest this unvetted, ineligible candidate who goes by the name Obama.

  35. 121 no-nonsense-nancy January 29, 2012 at 9:34 pm

    OT–have you ever wondered where your tax money goes? Do we have to hear of this from another country?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/retailandconsumer/9048122/Agent-Provocateur-sales-boosted-by-US-First-Lady-Michelle-Obama.html

    Who is she wearing them for? Certainly not for her ‘stinky’ husband!

  36. 122 no-nonsense-nancy January 29, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    http://www.michellesmirror.com is a very good read today. Well worth your time.

    Warning: You may want to spit nails.

  37. 123 Quantum Leap January 29, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    media black out on Ron Paul not only by lamestream media but the candidates not acknowledging him.

    Newton Leroy McPherson Gingrich is banking on his “electability” :lol:
    He’s crazy. He comes in last against obama.
    Obama leads Gingrich, 54%-40%. The president’s standing against him has risen nine points since early December; Gingrich has fallen by eight.

    Gingrich fares less well than Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who trails Obama by seven points, 50%-43%, and former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum, who also trails by seven points, 51%-44%.

    “Gingrich’s efforts to win the Republican nomination have set back his efforts to win the general election,” says political scientist Larry Jacobs of the University of Minnesota. Trying to appeal to Tea Party conservatives has “moved him out of the mainstream of American politics.”

    News from On Politics

    Latest posts from USA TODAY On Politics blog

    12:14 PM Paul vows to stick with GOP race
    11:08 AM TV’s Duggars help Santorum in Florida
    10:30 AM Gingrich: Romney ‘carpet-bombing’ rivals
    9:39 AM Poll: Romney expands Fla. lead over Gingrich
    4:39 PM McCain: Send Gingrich to the moon
    Read all On Politics posts The Swing States survey focuses on the nation’s most competitive battlegrounds: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

    In Florida, which holds its primary Tuesday, Romney led Gingrich in a Marist Poll released Sunday by 15 points, 42%-27%.

    Neither Romney nor Gingrich does particularly well when asked whether they understand the problems Americans face in their daily lives: 44% of those surveyed say that applies to each.
    That’s the poll results from 737 samples and no mention of Ron Paul
    This has to stop.

  38. 129 Quantum Leap January 29, 2012 at 9:41 pm

    That’s the story BUT Ron Paul really beats obama 54% for Ron Paul and 45% for obama.

  39. 130 patriot4usa January 30, 2012 at 12:12 am

    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/28/heres-the-deal-fixing-america/ We Weren’t Going to Stay Stupid Forever

    … by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

    • 131 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 12:33 am

      With the current voters on both sides it sure looks that way. The countries of the world are begging us to vote for Ron Paul. Is anyone listening?

    • 133 Jan January 30, 2012 at 1:00 pm

      It appears the White Hats and others are finalizing their plans.
      When I first started reading some of the reports, I thought “no way” but something kept nagging so I kept following.
      The meeting with Bush Sr., Jeb, and obat the other day, I think they are getting scared sh**less.
      Watch for Hillary to become ill while she is in a foreign country where there is no extradition.
      Will obat use this to get re-elected?
      G-20 or one of those meetings demanded that obat release these funds and he went back to the US the next morning and refused to release them.
      Will he use this like the osama bin laden to put a feather in his cap? Leader of the World?

      • 134 drkate January 30, 2012 at 1:10 pm

        That is a good point, in terms of using this to get re-elected. But, I think he could not get away with betraying his handlers if he did this, because he is in it up to his big floppy ears.

    • 135 Ann January 30, 2012 at 11:06 pm

      Thanks for that link! Fantastic article and it looks like the “white hats” are real, at least that’s what I got from it. I’ve heard about the Wanta Trust for a couple of years but just figured it was some kind of conspiracy crap. Wow, that’s an eye-opener for sure.

  40. 136 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 12:18 am

    OMG gateway, hillbuzz and others are blindly going over the cliff for Newton Leroy McPherson Gingrich. Hoft says “Thousands have gathered to see Newton in FL.” (truly it’s an old folks home with just several hundred people there or less)
    Remember that he has had to cancel many campaign stops due to no one showing up??? That’s right. See how Lamestream media and now the desperate blogs are punking reality and the Ron Paul revolution.

    Why not pick a man who walks his talk serving the poor as God would have him? Why not pick a man capable of marriage fidelity and treating his wife right? Why not pick a man who is on the monetary committee in congress and if given the chance will finally be able to makes some inroads there? Why not pick a man whom Newton steals talking points from? Why not pick a man who really wants smaller government and fiscal soundness which will create more opportunity? Why not pick a man who will allow the people to run their own lives? Why not pick a man who is more brilliant than all of congress and the candidates including obama put together? Why not pick the real conservative and not the Rino’s like Romney, Rick Sanctimonious or Newton?

    Baffled.

  41. 138 patriot4usa January 30, 2012 at 12:24 am

    Here is the Obummer story…..all of it….this explains everything!!!!! Obama Eligibility: Pelosi Supplied Altered Congressional Records To The 2008 Election Commission! http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/09/17/u-s-supreme-court-confers-on-obama-eligibility-pelosi-supplying-altered-congressional-records-to-the-election-commission/ Great Read and It all comes together perfect…pitchforks in the streets next! Man have they been caught BIG time!!

    • 139 Jan January 30, 2012 at 12:52 am

      Fantastic article
      Love the pictures !!!

    • 140 Jan January 30, 2012 at 1:06 pm

      For some reason I cannot open obama state ballot challenge, this was their last message

      All Republican Presidential Candidates May be Removed from Illinois Primary Ballot Depriving Voters Ability to Vote on Them

  42. 141 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 12:29 am

    The above video is the Tea Party? Something fishy here. They are blindly going over the cliff. Repubs know better than anyone how to lose. They are so fracking dumb it’s pitiful… And the disenfranchised dems taught them how to fight? What a waste of time for the disenfranchised. Total waste. These people are dumber than doorknobs. This will be another McCain redo. Bet me. Unless they wise up they are doomed.

    Write in campaign going on around the country. Write in for Dr Paul. No if’s, and’s or but’s.

    Sarah needs to STFU. She’s about as smart as a hairpin. And that’s not saying much. Did she get hit over the head recently? Is she suffering from permanent concussion? Maybe she fell down on those skimpy high heels and hit her head.—–Sheesh. She’s supporting the corrupt RINO Newton. What a blowhard.

    I’m dreaming about Georgia now too.

  43. 142 Troy January 30, 2012 at 6:09 am

    I don’t think she is necessarily supporting the Newt as much as she is attempting to keep Romney from running away with the nomination….The only way to keep it from happening is for Newt, Ricky or Ron to catch up.

    • 143 slcraignbc January 30, 2012 at 6:34 am

      As I have expressed I have problems with all of the “professional politicians” that offer to LEAD we the People.

      Their arrogance offends me.

      And in spite of the rhetoric of RP, he too fails the smell test. He abandoned his ‘principled position’ of being an Independent in order to gain the imprimatur of ‘creditability’ as a candidate and yet will not dismiss the prospect of returning to the 3rd Party should that imprimatur be insufficient to gain him the GOP nomination.

      It is one thing to “Flip Flop” on some policy, but to flip flop matters of principle that was in large measure the source of support is a bit disconcerting.

      Then there is the issue of the “youth support’, who in large measure tag along on his stance of ‘legalization’ of drugs.

      We are engaged in a condition that resembles the “Opium Wars” of Chinese history in its engagement with ill advised policies of Great Britain and the Libertarian view is to surrender to the bases levels of immoral indulgence that cripples generations.

      That said, would I vote for RP…?….No, but I will Vote against SOCIALISM…and that means voting for whoever is on the ticket of the GOP, the only viable alternative in this election cycle.

      And I’ll do that in the hopes that whoever that candidate is has the coat-tails to carry a significant number of “Tea Party” Conservative non-professional politicians into to office with pitchforks and brooms.

      • 144 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 2:33 pm

        Good luck with that. If it takes being on the pub ticket for Paul to even get noticed so be it. Obammy is on the dem ticket but he’s a member of the “new democratic communist Party” He’s not a dem. Looking for perfection huh? Keep looking ’cause it does not exist. I refuse to hold my nose for the blowhard romney or newton. Forget it. what’s the difference? None! Willard, Newton, Bush, obammy are all the same. Why bother?

        • 145 drkate January 30, 2012 at 2:43 pm

          Well I feel the same way…voting for newt, romney,or sick rantorum is the same as voting for the obutt. And then everyone goes to sleep again. And America is over. If I have to write in Ron Paul I am going to do so.

          I am holding out for a brokered convention, with the winner to be determined by the people, forget the establishment gop.

          This year, its a now or never situation, imho.

        • 146 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 2:54 pm

          PS it’s a known fact that the youth are voting Ron Paul for their FUTURES and not some preceived notion of legalizing drugs. Ron Paul is NOT for legalizing drugs. It’s much deeper than that and about the phony “war on drugs”. Like so many others you misconstrue his true intentions.

        • 147 slcraignbc January 30, 2012 at 5:16 pm

          well, it’s just the cold hard fact that any vote for anyone other than the GOP Nominee is an unequivicable vote for Socialism…….in this ‘election cycle’……whoever the GOP Nominee is must be made aware of that and have his feet kept to the fire while the Tea Party Caucus does its work to clear the way for better choices in the mid-term and the general 4 years from now.

          ………but, all I know is that it was not my vote that put the ‘0’ in office………..

          • 148 drkate January 30, 2012 at 5:45 pm

            Also, we forget that we need to make them accountable, I think as you said earlier. But ‘socialism’ is not the only threat…it is really globalism, all of which has the ‘socialist’ mask in terms of controlling the means of production. The problem with all the R’s, except Ron Paul, is they will continue the globalism. So by saying ‘no’ to socialism, we let globalism take its place?

            • 149 kaliguy101 January 30, 2012 at 8:10 pm

              May I add what they are really shooting for is GLOBAL SOCIALISM aka worldwide slaves for them.

            • 151 slcraignbc January 31, 2012 at 6:22 am

              And therein we see the deceptive nature of the enemy we battle, when the notion that there is a distinction between the agendas of the various tentacles of the octopus.

              Do you also see a difference in the agendas of the Muslim Brotherhood and Jihadists….?

              The fact that we have Global enemies that have an alliance bent on the destruction of the U.S. requires that we recognize from where the source of their agreements resides that gives it footing in our affairs, and it is from within, the socialists within.

              • 152 drkate January 31, 2012 at 9:49 am

                No, I don’t see a difference. But I do agree, and now see, the enemy within is the socialist, with whom their agreements lie.

        • 153 Paula January 31, 2012 at 5:47 am

          Exactly right! No difference whether you vote Obama, Gringrich, Romney, or Santorum lite. They’ve all sold their principles for the love of power/money, as I see it.

  44. 154 no-nonsense-nancy January 30, 2012 at 8:43 am

    THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS IS STILL EVIL.

    This lady tell it like it is.

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Betty/Freauf208.htm

  45. 155 slcraignbc January 30, 2012 at 9:57 am

    Brief · January 30, 2012

    The Foundation
    “Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.” –George Washington

    Poisoning the well of political rhetoricPolitical Futures

    “The Republican candidates’ circular firing squad now seems to be using machine guns. Whoever the eventual ‘last man standing’ turns out to be, he may not be standing very tall or very steadily on his feet — and he may be a pushover for Barack Obama in the general election, thanks to fellow Republicans. Whether you are a Democrat, a Republican or an independent, this is a very serious and historically crucial time for the United States of America. … ‘The politics of personal destruction’ — as Bill Clinton called it, and as he himself practiced it — is not the way to solve the nation’s problems. It has already poisoned the well of political discourse this season and claimed Herman Cain as its first victim, on the basis of unsubstantiated accusations by women with checkered pasts of their own. Whether Herman Cain was good, bad or indifferent as a candidate, and whether his chances of winning the Republican nomination were substantial or non-existent is not the issue. Nor is this the issue as regards Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney or any other candidate. Poisoning the well of political discourse may be one of the reasons why we see such unsatisfactory sets of candidates for political office in both parties, not only this year but in previous election years as well. … The time is long overdue to get serious.” –economist Thomas Sowell

    Full Article; http://patriotpost.us/opinion/thomas-sowell/2012/01/26/is-anybody-serious/

  46. 156 Kritisa Baxter January 30, 2012 at 10:07 am

    He’s doing everything he can to destroy our Constitution.

  47. 157 Jan January 30, 2012 at 1:26 pm

    Forwarded from my friend:
    Oh man, this is a superb article where Betty absolutely skewers those phony talk show hosts who rule the airwaves. Ever wonder why all the local personalities have disappeared? It’s because the syndicated talking heads are all leading us down the path of destruction. The Republicans are in bed with the Democrats and have been for decades and the radio hosts and Fox News are pushing the same old communist lite filth like Newt, Willard Romney and Santorum. Ugly. Betty hit the nail on the head with this one. RON PAUL 2012
    I recommend this (http://www.newswithviews.com) article — Betty Freauf — Presidential Candidate Ron Paul An Anomaly. You should check this out at, http://www.newswithviews.com/Betty/Freauf208.htm

  48. 158 Katie January 30, 2012 at 1:30 pm

    “On this 30th day of January in the Year Of Our Lord 2012, America, it is my distinct disgust yet responsibility to announce:

    “Obama” Virtual Reality is officially, fully established.

    If you’re as sickened as I am, tonight, set your computer to the Jeff Rense Radio Program.

    Attorney Mario Apuzzo will be Jeff’s guest, discussing “Obama’s” Actual Reality. Like his Constitutional Ineligibility for The United States Presidency. The multiple Presidential Ballot Challenges to “Obama’s” eligibility – including what’s transpiring in Georgia.

    And the “Barack Obama II” Virtual Birth Certificate. The reality of which has yet to be produced.”

    Read the full, short article here:

    http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/gimme-something-real-mario-apuzzo-on-the-jeff-rense-program-tonight/

  49. 159 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 2:29 pm

    I am so sickened I could cry. That means business and jobs issues will worsen still if he gets 4 more years. The choices on the repub ticket are sickening and the way they block Dr Paul from the news makes me totally sick. The fix is in and it leaves us all breathless.

  50. 162 surfingranny35 January 30, 2012 at 4:28 pm

    There would be NO ballot challenges had not GOP Presidential Candidate John Dummett came up with the strategy to NOT attack BHO on where he was born, but on the fact that he had a British father and could NOT qualify as a natural born citizen. John Dummett filed the first Dummett’s Dictum in AZ on Oct 24, and subsequently in TN, D.C. and NH, filing the Dictum in both STATE and FEDERAL courts in two of those states. IT WAS AFTER JOHN DUMMETT DID THIS, and others saw the wisdom of his approach, that the Obama Ballot Challenge site appeared, NOT GIVING JOHN DUMMETT the credit for the strategy, which he NEEDS FOR NAME RECOGNITION TO GET ON BALLOTS IN STATES IN LIEU OF SIGNATURES. How can you refer to these as ballot challenges instead of DUMMETT’S DICTUM. WHY ARE YOU NOT GIVING CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE? If you checked the dates, you would find that the ballot challenges came AFTER the filing of John’s first Dummett’s Dictum LAWSUITS against the DNC/Pelosi/Reid/Wasserman in October 2011. You should get your facts straight before reporting on something of such importance. THERE WOULD BE NO BALLOT CHALLENGES WITHOUT DUMMETT’S DICTUM!!

    • 163 drkate January 30, 2012 at 4:45 pm

      Thank you for the information. I was not aware of this, although the idea of a ballot challenge has been presented before, in fact in 2008. I think its a good idea to forward this information to the Obama challenge so credit can be given. Thank you!

    • 164 Troy January 30, 2012 at 5:56 pm

      Ya know, this isn’t some kind of a popularity contest…..We’re in a freakin’ war to save this country from destruction from within our own White House…..This is a time for egos to be checked at the door…..It’s not about who did what first…..It’s about everybody stepping up to the plate to do whatever they can, big or small, to oust the usurper…..If anyone is fighting Obama to try to get name recognition or a feather in their cap, then they should rethink their motives….It’s ALL about saving the country and not about personal gain or recognition.

      Dummett did some great work and so have tons of other people….I’d like to think that it’s all a team effort and any due credit should go to all if credit is a requirement for saving a country.

      I don’t much care for Donofrio on a personal level, in fact I think he’s pretty much a prick, but if not for him no one like Dummett or anyone else would be taking any action based upon natural born citizenship….It was primarily Donofrio that educated the country on the NBC issue…..I wonder if Dummett or anyone else has gone out of their way to thank Leo or to bestow “credit” upon him.

      Isn’t being a patriot and fighting to save our country enough and without att-a-boys being a requirement?

      • 165 Jan January 30, 2012 at 6:15 pm

        I have seen this same kind of crap all over the Tea parties, and once they splinter they are co-opted.
        If the only reason you do a good deed is for recognition, then you should have never done it in the first place.
        I personally have been working to get obat out for over three years, before he actually got in. Big deal, there are many out there that did the research, shared the research and kept the ball rolling.
        I get ticked at World Net Daily because they interview and try to be the first to expose something that someone else dug up.
        Some of the attorneys involved do the same thing.
        There are only a couple of things all of us need to spend our energies on, one-get obat removed before he shuts our whole country down and two, where will we go from there.

      • 167 cedartree January 30, 2012 at 8:13 pm

        I agree, sheesh the “dad not US Citizen” has been discussed since 2008 by many un-named patriots.

        We don’t even know if he’s 35.

        Think about it.

      • 168 Paula January 31, 2012 at 5:54 am

        Well said Troy; Thank you.

  51. 174 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 8:18 pm

    I’m tuning in to the show in 40 mins. I hope it’s good.

  52. 175 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 9:08 pm

    ,b>Bobby Jindal recalls own Obama tarmac tiff
    It’s a staged event and all a poltical ploy by preshnidentie obammy

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/72143.html

    He does it with quite a few people cause he’s afraid to “look bad” for being stupid and lazy and not doing his job.

  53. 176 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 9:14 pm

    Obama is a fanatical, mendacious sociopath with no conscience and the candidate for worst president

  54. 177 Troy January 30, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    Rense just stated exactly what I stated above about egos needing to be checked at the door.

    • 178 drkate January 31, 2012 at 12:08 am

      Troy, very effective comment on checking egos at the door. Just amazing how much that has damaged us.

      The Apuzzo interview was good, for me it was important that he said of the possibility of X being Obama’s real father, “it doesn’t matter. Obama sr is his legal father, and that is what matters.”

      I really respect and admire Mario Apuzzo. A selfless person, perfect for the job he did!

      • 179 Quantum Leap January 31, 2012 at 2:24 am

        X is not his father. He is an Obongo for sure. I’m an accomplished artist. ‘Similiar in appearance’ doesn’t mean anything…..his obongo family tree is exact and I know what I’m talking about. It’s more than the “shape” of the head. Sure anything is possible but I assure it’s highly unlikely. Obama Sr. is his father. Obama is the spitting image of his aunt in Boston. If I could show you how then you would know. If I could demonstrate you would see.
        There I finally said it. Ann?

        • 180 Ann January 31, 2012 at 11:29 am

          You rang? lol Hey I’m the one that said you can’t go by looks to prove someone is related. As far as I’m concerned, he named O Sr. as daddy, so he owns it. Martha Trowbridge (or whatever her name is) hasn’t given one shred of evidence to her theory so as far as I (or anyone else) know it’s still a theory and a far-fetched one in my opinion. Just another distraction.

  55. 181 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 9:26 pm

    Good one

  56. 185 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 9:40 pm

    Get rid of NDAA or the firdt to go will be the jounalists and the occupiers of wall street gang. That’s no so bad is it?

  57. 192 Quantum Leap January 30, 2012 at 10:07 pm

    from 6 months ago

  58. 194 SirLurksAlot January 31, 2012 at 12:38 am

    http://www.coachisright.com/obama-attorney-knows-eligibility-hearing-was-disaster-for-the-president/#idc-container

    I realize this article has been out for a few days but what caught my eye was one of the comments by “Max Maximus”. There were only 14-15 comments and towards the bottom…I’ll paraphrase…

    ‘heard on the news this morning that a state has risen to the top for consideration for not one but two new nuclear power plants..that state is..wait for it…Georgia.’

  59. 197 SirLurksAlot January 31, 2012 at 12:59 am

    This gets wackier by the day. Are these liberal asses born this way?

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/30/sheriff-arpaios-phoenix-offices-temporarily-evacuated/

    • 198 drkate January 31, 2012 at 1:04 am

      yes, they are wacky. trying to do everything to discredit him. Sheriff Joe is in Vegas now for the constitutional sheriffs conference. Check out revolution radio archives for the two shows!

  60. 199 Quantum Leap January 31, 2012 at 2:42 am

    Nucear Power is bad stuff. Check Fukoshima. They have to be built on the shore. Trojan was a disaster and finally got shut down in 1980. It still stands ugly and bigger than the sky like a deforemed phallic symbol and has contaminated everything around it for miles and there wasn’t even an accident there. It is on the Columbia River a tributary to the mouth of the Pacific. dk knows this..
    Georgia doesn’t need these. Drill for oil. Put up solar. . Not Nuclear. Obammy is trying to bribe. That’s more proof he is full of chit. He does not have documentation and is not a legal sitting president.

    Again Malcolm is not his father anymore than VJ is his mother.

    • 200 heather January 31, 2012 at 8:53 am

      Illinois had a “steam vent” yesterday and that steam had radiation in it–was all over my local news this morning. Give me natural gas and oil!

  61. 201 Jan January 31, 2012 at 3:00 am

    Well, if you can stand to listen to Rachel MadCow, listen towards the end where the Dem party chair states that if the SOS decides to remove obat from the ballot they will sue in Fed Court

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/rachel-maddow-too-ridiculous-for-words

    • 202 drkate January 31, 2012 at 9:53 am

      rachel ‘madcow’… :grin:

      So I think I agree that they are trapped, because they will ahve to prove he is a NBC. The federal courts may destroy the GA opinion, but, it is risky for them because they can’t prove anything about obama. they’ll just have to insist that the parties rule and the states can’t say anything.

  62. 203 cedartree January 31, 2012 at 3:48 am

    yes he doesn’t have a single slip of paper in temrs of documentation, he’s never shown anythinganywhere

    and he may not be 35

    think about it…

  63. 204 jane January 31, 2012 at 12:31 pm

    The prerecorded message…IS THAT FOR REAL????????????????

    That scares me to death! Did everyone watch it??????????

  64. 210 cedartree January 31, 2012 at 2:45 pm

    Do you think the adobe layers were left “on” on purpose? Do you think one of Obama’s dumbots were being stupid or did one of them sabotage? The adobe layering was meant to make the LFBC bogus, and OBAMA NEVER SAID IT WAS HIS UNTIL he did not object to it being admitted as evidence in court, and now it is his. It’s all Obama’s now. It’s in the official court record.

    In georgia, Van Irion entered into evidence Obama’s forged long form BC with the adobe layers still active, Irion stipulated to the online Adobe-layered LFBC as Obama’s actual LFBC…AND he entered the Supreme Court precedent ruling that a natural born citizen has 2 US Citizen parents and is born on US soil (Minor v. Happersett). Obama agreed, because he did not object.

    Obama had acknowledged this court had jurisdiction over him by sending his lawyer, who at first entered a motion to quash because Obama was busy, which was denied, then he wrote a 1200 word letter saying Obama wouldn’t be coming to court, which is contempt.

    So now that forged BC is Obama’s, and the SCOTUS ruling is hardfast.

    Fail, and Fail.

    AND the SoS forewarned that if Obama did not show, off the ballot he goes.

    This means the only way out for Obama is to say that LFBC is not his BC, in order to both deny it as his forgery, and to claim he had a US Citizen father.

    But as it is now, Obama owns his LFBC, Adobe layering forgery and all, it’s his. He wanted us to accept it as his, without his owning it. The court record says he owns it.

    • 211 Quantum Leap January 31, 2012 at 3:09 pm

      I think they don’t know how to use photoshop nor how to merge layers.

      Have Fl election results come in yet?

    • 212 drkate January 31, 2012 at 3:36 pm

      And as Apuzzo said on Rense Radio, Obama sr is his LEGAL father. There IS no option for Obama right now. He needs to step down and go directly to jail.

      • 213 cedartree January 31, 2012 at 4:24 pm

        Apuzzo also said that Congress is complicit and would be too embarrassed to move, and Obama may just get away with his crimes.

        Whatever happens, it’s not happening through the Federal judiciary on up, it’s not happening through Congress, and it’s not happening through the media. All other routes are open to The People.

        • 214 slcraignbc January 31, 2012 at 6:31 pm

          This is in response to the question of the NULLIFICATION of the ACTS of a USURPER.

          It is in large measure in the hands of the Congress and Mario has a point as far as the Congress that WAS is concerned.

          We will be looking to see what the Congress that WILL BE will do.

          But the simple fact is that any person that was affected negatively by any act of the “0′ will have a “cause of action” against the U.S., and in the obverse, any person who received positive results of any act of the “0′ will be subject to claims for reimbursement.

          This raises the point that although the Congress can ‘manage’ the issue in bits and pieces in attempts to forestall public retaliation, the prudent course would be to NULLIFY all Acts, other than perfunctory and ceremonial kinds, and return all nullified legislation for new votes under new titles.

          All of the issues could/should be addressed in a prepared “Articles of Removal” with House and Senate versions reconciled and voted in a Joint Session presided over by the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS.

          The new Executive would not need to be party to the process.

          Any blood shed would be on the hands of the Usurper and would be an advisable codicile to include in the Articles of Removal.

      • 215 Jan January 31, 2012 at 4:29 pm

        The thing that bothered me about the Rense program was when it was stated that they could not just invalidate everything that obat has signed, why not?
        I would think that if I walked in to the white house and signed a bill it would be invalid if I got caught signing it.
        Is there some kind of law that states they can’t just nullify everything he has done in the past three years?

        • 216 cedartree January 31, 2012 at 4:36 pm

          Apuzzo mentioned something about an invalid officer, removing them without the entire system crumbling or something.
          I remember Edwin Vieira wrote an article about how Obama was simply null and void.
          As this would be groundbreaking epic proportion history making on the fly, I’m sure it would get ugly and violent.
          If even 40% of America thinks Obama is A-OK after all the destruction he has wrought. If even 10% think removing the usurper is simply “racist”. If even 1% think their benies that the usurper promised them are going to end….
          All hell will break loose. But that hell would be better than the certain march to dictatorship.

        • 218 heather January 31, 2012 at 7:37 pm

          I don’t think there is any such law–I think it all has to do with whoever is doing it and how much they will….like romney keeps saying, 1st he will repeal obamacare and now he will repeal parts of it….they pick and choose depending on whats in it for them.

          We dont have laws based on our constitution, we have them based on whats good for them and how much they can line their pockets.

  65. 219 heather January 31, 2012 at 3:19 pm

    “This means the only way out for Obama is to say that LFBC is not his BC, in order to both deny it as his forgery, and to claim he had a US Citizen father.”

    Well, we have a mess now don’t we—so this mean barry either owns it like he wrote it or he has to tell who his real father is—and that would include his mother as well. His wifie is head deep in this right along with him, so goes down too.

    The old saying goes, the bigger ya are the harder ya fall and wow–he’s got a long way to fall—and he will have to bring down his corrupt pals with him….

  66. 220 JJ January 31, 2012 at 5:40 pm

    I’ve been thinking:
    Why did Pelosi delete the important constitution phrase from the second document sent to Hawaii?
    Was it because the first was returned/rejected by Hawaii officials?
    Was that document rejected because Hawaii officials knew that they would be liable for signing a document when they all knew there was no vault long form birth certificate in their records?
    Why has Tim Adams not been called to testify about the truth that all officials knew there was no long form BC in their state dept records…as he worked the election committee in Hawaii and also signed an affidavit giving all this information.

    Also, I was part ot a committee in 2008–our job was to send certified information to our state electors about the ineligible Barack Obama—before the swearing in.
    We were ignored, slandered, cussed, and belittled by some of these electors.
    Culpible they were; ignorant of the facts, not so much.
    I thought for 3 years, with the number of incompetence so blatantly displayed by hundreds, that there was a detrimental threat of bombs placed all across our nation. With the behavior of Supreme Court justices, Congress, Secretary of States, Governors, and the MSM, who wouldn’t??
    I guess that would be proven wrong now.
    There aren’t enough jails to hold all guilty of sharing in this constitutional disaster.
    Peace…JayJay

  67. 221 Tenacity January 31, 2012 at 6:34 pm

    Did I hear somebody say “ego”. Heck, I just get up in the morning and thank God they didn’t no-knock me over night while I’m putting my pants on.

  68. 223 Doris McCoy February 2, 2012 at 12:21 pm

    I reposted to please support Judge… from Harry Riley. Didn’t know if I could leave his name on it because of privacy, so I didn’t.

    Maybe we could repost this request over and over in support


Comments are currently closed.



January 2012
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

PROTECT OUR LIBERTY HERE!

Get Your Copy at drkatesview@gmail.com

Blog Archive

Just follow copyright law and nobody gets hurt!

The contents of this blog are protected under U.S. Copyright Law, United States Code, Title 17. Requests for use of active and archived articles in this blog must be presented in writing in the comment section, and proper attribution is expected. Thank you in advance.

drkatesview thanks you!

Donate to DrKatesView!

Donate Now!

Since 8/15/09

  • 1,693,315 views

Listen to drkate’s Revolution Radio

RSS Atlas Shrugs

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS American Spectator

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Button 1 120 by 90
Site Build It!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 603 other followers

%d bloggers like this: