Eight Principles

©2011 drkate

• The first ‘birthers’ of America were the Founders, who insisted that the President be either a natural born citizen or a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.
• It is settled law, history, policy and practice in the United States that a natural born citizen is born in the country of two citizen parents.
• It is settled history, law, and practice that ‘a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution’ meant the original founders, the first several Presidents of the United States.  Two important principles are implicit in this particular statement of Article II:

• Recognition that being born in America of parents who were citizens of  and who had allegiance to another country would not be sufficient to ensure complete fidelity to the United States.
• Since no one in the U.S.A. was a natural born citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution–they were born British subjects and gained U.S. citizenship in April 1782 at the end of the Revolution– and since there would be no ‘natural born citizen’ that had obtained the age of 35, a provision was made to grandfather in those initial American citizens to be eligible citizens for President. Martin Van Buren was the first natural born citizen President of the United States as he was born Dec 1782 to two U.S. Citizens, who acquired their U.S. Citizenship at the end of the Revolution.

• That the  lower courts and SCOTUS have avoided ruling on any aspect of Article II during 2008-2011 means the definition of natural born citizen stands as is.
• Notwithstanding Congress’ efforts to amend the definition of natural born citizen through failed constitutional amendments or non-binding resolutions, they have not changed the definition, nor can they.
• There is no legal or constitutional authority granted to anyone to change this settled definition of natural born citizen.  Flat-earth eligibility deniers cannot parse the words in Article II, or find some magical clause in Blackstone, nor any act of law that can change this definition.
• Enabling Obama to avoid the Constitutional criteria specified in Article II is an act of treason against the Constitution.  Knowledge of this act and or failure to address this, constitutes the felony of misprision of treason.
• These are grounds for the immediate removal, resignation, and prosecution of those individuals.

Just how are they going to get Obama on the ballot?

Open thread!

Adverse Inference-update

©2011 drkate

(Update.  In light of Obama’s release of yet another obviously fraudulent certificate of live birth, with no seal and obvious photoshop effects, a reminder that(a) his father’s citizenship makes him still ineligible for the Presidency, (b) Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama, was adopted by an Indonesian national, yet the ‘certificate of live birth’ contains no amendments that reflect that real life event, which, until he releases all of his records, makes him a citizen-subject of Britain and a citizen of both Kenya and Indonesia.  He still cannot prove he is American.)

not eligible

With regard to Obama, then,  Americans are entitled to adopt a framework of  adverse inference about his American citizenship.

Adverse Inference:

• Unfavorable deduction that may be drawn by the fact-finder from the failure of a party to produce a normally expected witness or other evidence. It may be presumed that the failure to produce was because the testimony or other evidence would have been harmful to that party.
• An adverse inference generally is a legal inference, adverse to the concerned party, made from a party’s silence or the absence of requested evidence. For example, as a sanction for spoliation of evidence, a court may instruct the jury it could draw an inference that the evidence contained in the destroyed documents would have been unfavorable.

Obama and his new world order handlers, complicit democrats and republicans, the flat-earth eligibility deniers, and the media have lost their epic multi-million dollar battle to keep Obama’s illegality hidden from the American public. They have lost it because both they and Obama cannot produce any evidence that Obama is a natural born citizen, let alone American citizen.

With each day, the depth of Obama’s deception is exposed, even with the most basic element of natural born citizenship–being an American citizen.

We Write With Urgency…

©2011 drkate

Author’s Note.  As readers of this blog know I have endeavored to focus the natural born citizenship discussion on its full unified meaning…born in the United States to two American citizen parents. This is the most basic definition we can glean from the use of the term ‘natural born citizen’, rather than ‘citizen’ to describe the higher level of allegiance required for the office of the President and Commander in Chief.  Nature’s law, and the Law of Nations were the context within which major portions of our Constitution were written.  Absent a constitutional amendment or another Supreme Court decision beyond the 1874 affirmation of the definition of natural born citizen, we have no legal authority to arbitrarily separate the geographic test and the parental citizenship tests for natural born citizenship required by Article II.

It seems that when we are close to really focusing on the concept of natural born citizenship, numerous diversions constantly blur what should be a sharp discussion.  The birth certificate, social security fraud, selective service registration fraud, differing versions of the meaning of natural born citizen, Kenyan birth certificates, state nomination form fraud…all of these are important tools that would bring any ‘Al Capone’ down. These findings offer invaluable evidence of a pattern of fraud and a trail of complicit entities.  But the fundamental fraud right in front of our eyes is the failure of Barack Obama to qualify as a natural born citizen as stated in Article II of the Constitution.  Whatever tool is used to bring Mr. Obama to justice and move him out of our White House, we cannot forget that what we are talking about is the Constitution’s most fundamental protection for our nation: the office of the President and Commander in Chief of the Nation’s Armed Forces.

This essay forms the basis of a certified letter recently sent  directly to Mr. Donald Trump by drkatesview, and is this author’s attempt to capture an unencumbered, clear focus on the natural born citizen.    In this version for the blog, I have linked some, but not all of the key articles from which I have learned much.  My letter to Mr. Trump contains an annotated bibliography of the most excellent materials developed over the last two years by many fine writers and in the legal cases valiantly pursued in the last several years. Readers are welcome to share this letter with proper attribution and a link back to this blog. My greatest goal is that you build on this letter to develop your own 5 minute definition of natural born citizen.

Not a Natural Born Citizen